TFPT scientific source excerpt
Original repository path: experiments/theory-contracts/original-local-source-variable-background-20261102/LATER-SOURCE.txt
Original file SHA-256: 2b61eee3d0dd557a1b428184c6978c78efa7d05630503f45084258a86c2381ac
Inclusive original lines: 201-226
Line numbers below refer to the original source.
This bounded excerpt is source evidence; it is not a new proof/checker run.
Conversation metadata and personal execution details are omitted where indicated.

000201 | 
000202 | Accordingly, use its reconstruction route in its original conditional
000203 | scope; do not count it as a second explicit same-S geometric marginal
000204 | producer, and do not make constructing an ambient measure a new universal
000205 | gate when the chosen route works on the already given boundary source.
000206 | 
000207 | 6. WHAT THIS CHANGES FOR THE CURRENT EXISTENCE QUESTION
000208 | 
000209 | The conclusion is positive and narrower than 'the measure is missing':
000210 | the later original constructs a complete common lattice state and
000211 | dynamics, with all bounded multitime words and compatible full local
000212 | restrictions. It therefore removes any supposed necessity of proving
000213 | exact finite bare Gibbs marginal equations before source existence.
000214 | 
000215 | For the presently pursued full original caller, the useful application
000216 | question is the actual identification of its retained field insertions
000217 | and interaction with this common source, or the already provided exact
000218 | effective blocking route being audited in sibling BLOCKING-PATH. The
000219 | existing theorem does not itself establish its controlled IR universality
000220 | or a common physical light cone; those remain the original mandatory
000221 | physical application conditions. A lattice-spacing continuum limit is
000222 | not made mandatory, and no earlier G reference conclusion is reopened.
000223 | 
000224 | No new code harness, chosen measure, field potential, averaging rule or
000225 | physical selection condition was introduced. The20 G controls were not
000226 | repeated, and the v1013 numeric witness was not mistaken for this proof.