TFPT scientific source excerpt Original repository path: experiments/theory-contracts/atlas-defect-synthesis-20261024/COVARIANT-INSTRUMENTS.txt Original file SHA-256: 858d770e27f80aadb347194c4a9d1a8c869b12163d6cfe8433e4b12b1275ab10 Inclusive original lines: 127-185 Line numbers below refer to the original source. This bounded excerpt is source evidence; it is not a new proof/checker run. Conversation metadata and personal execution details are omitted where indicated. 000127 | 000128 | After observing a, the prepared state is sigma_a(p). A second use of the 000129 | same POVM is therefore the six-state Markov chain 000130 | 000131 | Pr(b=a | a) = 5p/6, 000132 | Pr(b!=a | a) = (6-5p)/30. 000133 | 000134 | The transition matrix is doubly stochastic, so its stationary distribution 000135 | is uniform. The stationary two-step law has 000136 | 000137 | Pr(a,a) = 5p/36, 000138 | Pr(a,b) = (6-5p)/180, a!=b. 000139 | 000140 | At p=1 these numbers are 5/36 and 1/180, the same numbers obtained from the 000141 | Omega state in RELATIONAL-CHANNEL.txt. Here they arise from a separable 000142 | measure-and-prepare time sequence. Equality of these two tables is therefore 000143 | not evidence for entanglement or for a common physical preparation. 000144 | 000145 | Exact failure of state tomography 000146 | --------------------------------- 000147 | 000148 | The six effects span a six dimensional subspace of the full 25 dimensional 000149 | operator space. Repeating the instrument does not recover the missing 000150 | coherences. This is witnessed by two explicit positive states in the real 000151 | isometric H5 chart. 000152 | 000153 | Let 000154 | 000155 | X = i(|0><1| - |1><0|), 000156 | rho_+ = I5/5 + X/10, 000157 | rho_- = I5/5 - X/10. 000158 | 000159 | X is Hermitian and traceless. Both density matrices have the exact spectrum 000160 | 000161 | {1/10, 1/5, 1/5, 1/5, 3/10}, 000162 | 000163 | so they are distinct strictly positive states. Every E_a is real symmetric, 000164 | while X is imaginary antisymmetric. Therefore 000165 | 000166 | Tr(E_a X) = 0 000167 | 000168 | for all six outcomes and 000169 | 000170 | Tr(E_a rho_+) = Tr(E_a rho_-) = 1/6. 000171 | 000172 | The measure-and-prepare classification gives the probability of every finite 000173 | outcome word directly: 000174 | 000175 | Pr(a_1...a_n | rho) 000176 | = Tr(E_{a_1} rho) 000177 | product_{k=2}^n T_p[a_{k-1},a_k]. 000178 | 000179 | The two states have the same first factor, and the transition matrix is fixed 000180 | by p and the previous outcome. Induction in n proves that rho_+ and rho_- 000181 | have identical probabilities for every finite outcome word. Thus this 000182 | instrument family is not informationally complete and cannot reconstruct the 000183 | unmeasured GNS coherences or a complete GNS crossword from its outcome history. 000184 | This is an explicit counterexample, rather than a dimension-only inference. 000185 |