TFPT scientific source excerpt Original repository path: experiments/theory-contracts/original-admissible-source-closure-20261025/RELATIVE-PAIRING-REVIEW.txt Original file SHA-256: ef280950f70a108ecff5dde9f57c67d097494e3824fdd65aea2ca176b5b83a34 Inclusive original lines: 192-263 Line numbers below refer to the original source. This bounded excerpt is source evidence; it is not a new proof/checker run. Conversation metadata and personal execution details are omitted where indicated. 000192 | 4. The actual Quillen norm and the different positive-pair candidate 000193 | --------------------------------------------------------------------- 000194 | 000195 | For a chiral Fredholm family D_z^+, a relative determinant-line section s_z 000196 | has a Hermitian Quillen norm. With the convention that its squared norm is 000197 | given by the zeta determinant of the positive Laplacian, the elementary 000198 | identity is 000199 | 000200 | Delta log ||s_z/s_0||_Q 000201 | =(1/2) Delta log det_zeta((D_z^+)^*D_z^+). (5) 000202 | 000203 | For the actual cancelling pair, multiplicativity gives 000204 | 000205 | Det(R)=Det(R_+) tensor Det(R_-) 000206 | =Det(1-z) tensor Det((1-z)^(-1)) congruent C, (6) 000207 | 000208 | and its Quillen norm is 000209 | 000210 | ||s_R||_Q=|1-z| |1-z|^(-1)=1. (7) 000211 | 000212 | Equivalently, the positive operators associated with the two inverse relative 000213 | sections have reciprocal determinant ratios. Formula (5) therefore gives zero, 000214 | not Log(1-z). The same conclusion holds for complex z after the inverse phase 000215 | is included: the full determinant-line section is canonically the product of a 000216 | line and its dual. 000217 | 000218 | A different positively adding pair could be written abstractly as 000219 | 000220 | R_pos(z)=diag(1-z,1-z), 000221 | det R_pos(z)=(1-z)^2. (8) 000222 | 000223 | For real 0<=z<1 its Quillen norm would be 1-z, since the norm is the 000224 | square root of the squared norm. But R_pos is not R. It replaces the reflected 000225 | inverse update by a second copy of the same oriented update. The factor one 000226 | half is then only the standard conversion from norm squared to norm of this 000227 | different object. It is not a normalization that can be applied to the 000228 | cancelling pair. 000229 | 000230 | The required original identification is absent at three exact points: 000231 | 000232 | 1. The v42 master functional writes 000233 | 000234 | Re log det_zeta,Padm(D_xi^2+mu^2) 000235 | +(1/2) eta_Sigma,Padm(D_xi) 000236 | 000237 | with coefficient one on the positive determinant, not one half: 000238 | 000239 | documents/archive--paper-latex--tfpt-42/sections/ 000240 | 027-subsection-primitive-completion-from-the-boundary-kernel.tex: 000241 | 229-248. 000242 | 000243 | That source does not define D_xi as the covariance-pair deformation. 000244 | 000245 | 2. The active Quillen contract defines the continuum line from a chiral 000246 | family D_b^+ and requires a future comparison of its metrics and 000247 | connections with the occupied Berry line. It writes the proposed 000248 | functional with log det_zeta Delta_U(1), while explicitly retaining the 000249 | continuum comparison and first-principles response identity as open: 000250 | 000251 | documents/tfpt_research_contracts/sections/020-source.tex:180-240, 000252 | 296-318. 000253 | 000254 | 3. The already reviewed direct-defect contract records as open the equality 000255 | between the original electromagnetic logarithmic response and the 000256 | directed relative covariance determinant. Replacing that determinant by 000257 | a Quillen norm changes the candidate but does not prove the missing source 000258 | map. 000259 | 000260 | Thus neither the Quillen metric nor Delta eta turns the actual inverse pair 000261 | into the single factor. To use (8), the source must first construct a positive 000262 | pair family and then identify its electromagnetic observable with that norm. 000263 |