TFPT scientific source excerpt Original repository path: experiments/theory-contracts/atlas-defect-synthesis-20261024/COVARIANT-INSTRUMENTS.txt Original file SHA-256: 858d770e27f80aadb347194c4a9d1a8c869b12163d6cfe8433e4b12b1275ab10 Inclusive original lines: 1-200 Line numbers below refer to the original source. This bounded excerpt is source evidence; it is not a new proof/checker run. Conversation metadata and personal execution details are omitted where indicated. 000001 | COMPLETE COVARIANT INSTRUMENTS FOR THE NATIVE SIX-SIMPLEX POVM 000002 | ================================================================ 000003 | 000004 | Scope 000005 | ----- 000006 | 000007 | This theorem stays on the original native H5 and uses the six rank-one ovoid 000008 | effects and the sixty marked G31 actions already reconstructed by 000009 | doily_quartic_bridge.py. An instrument means six completely positive maps 000010 | 000011 | I_a : End(H5) -> End(H5) 000012 | 000013 | whose effects are the fixed operators E_a and which obey the actual outcome 000014 | covariance 000015 | 000016 | I_{pi_g(a)}(rho_g X rho_g^dagger) 000017 | = rho_g I_a(X) rho_g^dagger. 000018 | 000019 | The result classifies every such finite instrument. It does not add a new 000020 | carrier, select a physical value of its parameter, or turn the instrument into 000021 | physical time evolution. 000022 | 000023 | Why rank one forces measure and prepare 000024 | --------------------------------------- 000025 | 000026 | For one outcome let J_a be the positive Choi matrix of I_a. Its input 000027 | partial trace is E_a^T. Since E_a has rank one, positivity forces J_a to have 000028 | support only on 000029 | 000030 | support(E_a^T) tensor H5. 000031 | 000032 | Indeed, for x in the kernel of E_a^T, 000033 | 000034 | Tr[(|x> = 0. 000035 | 000036 | A positive matrix with zero expectation on that whole subspace has no row or 000037 | column there. Therefore there is a unique density matrix sigma_a such that 000038 | 000039 | J_a = E_a^T tensor sigma_a, 000040 | 000041 | or equivalently 000042 | 000043 | I_a(rho) = Tr(E_a rho) sigma_a. 000044 | 000045 | This is a theorem for every completely positive operation with the fixed 000046 | rank-one effect. It is not a chosen Kraus ansatz. 000047 | 000048 | Exact stabilizer commutant 000049 | -------------------------- 000050 | 000051 | Write 000052 | 000053 | P_a = (6/5) E_a. 000054 | 000055 | Each P_a is a rank-one orthogonal projector. The sixty original marked 000056 | actions are transitive on the six labels. For a fixed label a, forty marked 000057 | reflections fix a; their outcome permutations contain the ten transpositions 000058 | of the other five labels. Solving the full rational commutator system on 000059 | End(H5) gives rank 23 and hence 000060 | 000061 | dim_C Comm(Stab(a)) = 2. 000062 | 000063 | Both I5 and P_a lie in this commutant and are independent, so they form its 000064 | complete basis. Covariance makes sigma_a stabilizer invariant. Positivity 000065 | and trace one therefore give exactly 000066 | 000067 | sigma_a(p) = p P_a + (1-p)/4 (I5-P_a), 000068 | 0 <= p <= 1. 000069 | 000070 | Transitivity forces the same p for all six outcomes. Conversely the checker 000071 | verifies this family against every one of the sixty native actions. Thus the 000072 | displayed interval is the complete covariant instrument space. 000073 | 000074 | Kraus ranks and the extra minimality rule 000075 | ----------------------------------------- 000076 | 000077 | Because J_a=E_a^T tensor sigma_a, the minimal Kraus rank of one outcome is 000078 | rank(sigma_a): 000079 | 000080 | p=1: rank 1, 000081 | p=0: rank 4, 000082 | 0<1| - |1><0|), 000156 | rho_+ = I5/5 + X/10, 000157 | rho_- = I5/5 - X/10. 000158 | 000159 | X is Hermitian and traceless. Both density matrices have the exact spectrum 000160 | 000161 | {1/10, 1/5, 1/5, 1/5, 3/10}, 000162 | 000163 | so they are distinct strictly positive states. Every E_a is real symmetric, 000164 | while X is imaginary antisymmetric. Therefore 000165 | 000166 | Tr(E_a X) = 0 000167 | 000168 | for all six outcomes and 000169 | 000170 | Tr(E_a rho_+) = Tr(E_a rho_-) = 1/6. 000171 | 000172 | The measure-and-prepare classification gives the probability of every finite 000173 | outcome word directly: 000174 | 000175 | Pr(a_1...a_n | rho) 000176 | = Tr(E_{a_1} rho) 000177 | product_{k=2}^n T_p[a_{k-1},a_k]. 000178 | 000179 | The two states have the same first factor, and the transition matrix is fixed 000180 | by p and the previous outcome. Induction in n proves that rho_+ and rho_- 000181 | have identical probabilities for every finite outcome word. Thus this 000182 | instrument family is not informationally complete and cannot reconstruct the 000183 | unmeasured GNS coherences or a complete GNS crossword from its outcome history. 000184 | This is an explicit counterexample, rather than a dimension-only inference. 000185 | 000186 | Rational endpoint Choi certificates 000187 | ------------------------------------ 000188 | 000189 | The checker also represents the same native H5 as the zero-sum subspace of 000190 | Q^6. This is a redundant rational frame for the existing six rays, not a new 000191 | Hilbert space. With 000192 | 000193 | Q = I6 - (1/6) 11^T, 000194 | u_a = e_a - (1/6)1, 000195 | 000196 | one has exactly 000197 | 000198 | Gram(u_a) = Gram(q_a)/12, 000199 | E_a = u_a u_a^T, 000200 | P_a = (6/5)u_a u_a^T.