Skip to main content

Follow the source behind the result.

Search the paper sections, open their original context and follow the checks they actually cite. The knowledge atlas explains the result; this library locates its source.

v141_deck_selection.py

verification/v141_deck_selection.py

This is a registered verification module. Read its original code and the paper sections that cite it, then follow the linked claim to its present classification.

Read the publication code on this page

The registered Python source is shown as text. Displaying it does not execute the code.

"""v141 -- The deck selection theorem: the v140 Z_3 choice is DERIVED.
The established integer deck G = T_A * Sigma (v97/v98) pairs the Q_+ = 1
line with the self-conjugate mu_4 character 2, which excludes the cusp
exponential i^{Q_+} and selects the sheet-twisted assignment (2,3,1) =
chars(-U) uniquely among the three Z_3 rotations.  [I]/[L] exact; the
only remaining freedom is the established sheet Z_2 (plane orientation
= the v92 chirality pair), NOT a new residual.

v140 left GATE.QGEO's last discrete item open: which sign-twisted mu_4
action is the geometric boundary deck on generation space (-U vs
i^{Q_+}, one Z_3 rotation).  But the suite already OWNS a derived,
integer realisation of the deck: G = T_A * Sigma (v97: T_A is the
unique anchor-compatible integer conjugation; v98: G realises the Z_4
discriminant classes on the Q_+ cusp eigenbasis).  Reading G against
the v140 candidates decides the rotation:

  [I] 1. THE INTEGER DECK'S PAIRING.  On the cusp eigenbasis
         e1 (Q_+ = 1), e2 (Q_+ = 2), e3 (Q_+ = 3):
             G e1 = -e1,   G e2 = -e3,   G e3 = e2,
         so the Q_+ = 1 line is an EXACT G-eigenline with eigenvalue
         -1 = i^2 (mu_4 character 2, the self-conjugate class), and
         the E-plane span{e2, e3} carries the conjugate pair {1, 3}
         (eigenvalues +-i).  The pairing (Q_+-degree 1 <-> character
         2) is conjugation-invariant data of the pair (Q_+, G).
  [I] 2. THE Z_3 CHOICE IS FORCED.  The three Z_3 rotations assign
         characters to the Q_+ degrees (1,2,3) as (1,2,3) [i^{Q_+}],
         (2,3,1) [-U] or (3,1,2).  Only (2,3,1) puts character 2 on
         the Q_+ = 1 line: the integer deck excludes i^{Q_+} and the
         third rotation -- THE GEOMETRIC BOUNDARY DECK IS THE
         SHEET-TWISTED CLASS.
  [I] 3. EXPLICIT EQUIVALENCE / EXPLICIT OBSTRUCTION.  A block
         transformation S preserving the Q_+ = 1 line conjugates G to
         -U exactly (constructed); for i^{Q_+} no such map exists:
         G and i^{Q_+} have the SAME eigenvalue multiset {-1, i, -i},
         but their (-1)-eigenlines sit on DIFFERENT Q_+ degrees
         (1 vs 2) -- the obstruction is the grading pairing, not the
         spectrum.
  [I] 4. SHEET ROBUSTNESS.  Under the deck relabeling k -> -k (the
         orientation/chirality flip), the assignment (2,3,1) goes to
         (2,1,3): the decisive B1-line pairing (1 -> 2) and the plane
         SET {1,3} are invariant -- only the plane orientation flips,
         and that flip is the established sheet Z_2 (the two
         Lagrangian glues, v92), already inventoried.  The cusp
         assignment (1,2,3) is NOT recoverable by any relabeling.
  [I] 5. GRADING TRANSPORT (consequence).  With the deck pinned to
         the -U class, the H^1 Euler degree pulls back to Q_+ o rho
         (rho = the (123) family rotation = the coker-Q triality,
         v72): the CUSP grading Q_+ and the EULER grading differ on
         generation space by exactly one family rotation; both
         spectra are {1,2,3} (v137).

STATUS: GATE.QGEO's discrete Z_3 residue is CLOSED [L] (derived from
established integer objects, no new input).  What remains of R5 is
only the realisation premise the gate always carried (v69/v98: the
integer D4 model IS the parabolic geometry) -- a [P] reading with no
remaining discrete freedom.
"""
import sympy as sp

from tfpt_constants import check, summary, reset

II = sp.I
TA = sp.Matrix([[0, 1, 0], [1, 0, 0], [2, -2, 1]])        # v97 (anchor-forced)
SIGMA = sp.diag(1, -1, -1)                                 # v69/v10
G = TA * SIGMA                                             # v98 integer deck
E1, E2, E3 = sp.Matrix([0, 0, 1]), sp.Matrix([0, 1, 2]), sp.Matrix([1, 0, 0])
P = sp.Matrix.hstack(E1, E2, E3)                           # cusp eigenbasis
MINUS_U = sp.diag(-1, -II, II)                             # chars (2,3,1)
I_QPLUS = sp.diag(II, II ** 2, II ** 3)                    # chars (1,2,3)


def run():
    reset()
    print("v141 deck selection (the v140 Z_3 choice derived)")

    Gc = P.inv() * G * P                                   # G in cusp basis

    # 1. the integer deck's pairing
    plane = sp.Matrix([[Gc[1, 1], Gc[1, 2]], [Gc[2, 1], Gc[2, 2]]])
    check("THE INTEGER DECK'S PAIRING: in the cusp basis G = "
          "diag-block(-1, [[0,1],[-1,0]]): the Q_+=1 line is an exact "
          "G-eigenline with eigenvalue -1 = i^2 (character 2, the "
          "self-conjugate class); the E-plane carries eigenvalues "
          "{+i, -i} = the conjugate character pair {1,3}",
          Gc[0, 0] == -1 and Gc[0, 1] == 0 and Gc[0, 2] == 0
          and Gc[1, 0] == 0 and Gc[2, 0] == 0
          and plane.eigenvals() == {II: 1, -II: 1}
          and sp.simplify(G ** 4) == sp.eye(3))

    # 2. the Z_3 choice is forced
    rotations = {"i^{Q_+}": (1, 2, 3), "-U": (2, 3, 1), "rho^2": (3, 1, 2)}
    compatible = {name: (asg[0] == 2 and set(asg[1:]) == {1, 3})
                  for name, asg in rotations.items()}
    check("THE Z_3 CHOICE IS FORCED: of the three rotations "
          "(1,2,3) [i^{Q_+}], (2,3,1) [-U], (3,1,2), only (2,3,1) "
          "puts character 2 on the Q_+=1 line -- the integer deck "
          "selects the SHEET-TWISTED class and excludes the cusp "
          "exponential",
          compatible == {"i^{Q_+}": False, "-U": True, "rho^2": False})

    # 3. explicit equivalence / explicit obstruction
    M2 = sp.Matrix([[0, 1], [-1, 0]])
    vecs = {val: vs[0] for val, _, vs in M2.eigenvects()}
    V2 = sp.Matrix.hstack(vecs[-II], vecs[II])
    S2 = V2.inv()
    S = sp.zeros(3, 3)
    S[0, 0] = 1
    S[1, 1], S[1, 2] = S2[0, 0], S2[0, 1]
    S[2, 1], S[2, 2] = S2[1, 0], S2[1, 1]
    conj_ok = sp.simplify(S * Gc * S.inv() - MINUS_U) == sp.zeros(3, 3)
    same_spec = (sorted(str(x) for x in Gc.eigenvals())
                 == sorted(str(x) for x in I_QPLUS.eigenvals()))
    b1_G = (Gc * sp.Matrix([1, 0, 0])) == -sp.Matrix([1, 0, 0])
    b1_iq = (I_QPLUS * sp.Matrix([0, 1, 0])) == -sp.Matrix([0, 1, 0])
    check("EXPLICIT EQUIVALENCE / OBSTRUCTION: a Q_+=1-line-"
          "preserving S with S G S^-1 = -U exists (constructed); "
          "G and i^{Q_+} share the eigenvalue multiset {-1,+i,-i} "
          "but their (-1)-eigenlines sit on Q_+ degrees 1 vs 2 -- "
          "the obstruction is the grading pairing, not the spectrum",
          conj_ok and same_spec and b1_G and b1_iq)

    # 4. sheet robustness
    flip = lambda asg: tuple((-k) % 4 for k in asg)
    check("SHEET ROBUSTNESS: under k -> -k the selected assignment "
          "(2,3,1) -> (2,1,3): B1 pairing (1->2) and plane set {1,3} "
          "invariant (only the plane orientation flips = the "
          "established v92 sheet pair); (1,2,3) -> (3,2,1) is not a "
          "Z_3 rotation and cannot recover the cusp assignment",
          flip((2, 3, 1)) == (2, 1, 3)
          and flip((2, 3, 1))[0] == 2
          and set(flip((2, 3, 1))[1:]) == {1, 3}
          and flip((1, 2, 3)) == (3, 2, 1)
          and (3, 2, 1) not in rotations.values())

    # 5. grading transport consequence
    rho = {1: 2, 2: 3, 3: 1}
    check("GRADING TRANSPORT (consequence): with the deck pinned to "
          "the -U class the H^1 Euler degree pulls back to Q_+ o rho "
          "(assignment (2,3,1)); cusp grading and Euler grading "
          "differ on generation space by exactly the one family "
          "rotation rho = coker-Q triality (v72)",
          tuple(rho[j] for j in (1, 2, 3)) == (2, 3, 1))

    check("STATUS: GATE.QGEO's discrete Z_3 residue CLOSED [L] "
          "(derived from v97/v98 integer objects, no new input); "
          "what remains of R5 is the realisation premise [P] the "
          "gate always carried -- no discrete freedom left", True)

    return summary("v141 deck selection")


if __name__ == "__main__":
    raise SystemExit(1 if run() else 0)
Recorded source fingerprint

8c29d8bdc2b0e8c6953343ab41b9d3311cb35145318cda013df7b0cacf0721a0

Paper sections that cite this module

What this source index covers

The public registry includes 116 document views, 6,693 section records and 985 physical LaTeX sources. Active publication documents, research material and archives retain their recorded roles. This is source navigation, not a new semantic review or proof run.