Follow the source behind the result.
Search the paper sections, open their original context and follow the checks they actually cite. The knowledge atlas explains the result; this library locates its source.
v146_moebius_d4.py
verification/v146_moebius_d4.py
This is a registered verification module. Read its original code and the paper sections that cite it, then follow the linked claim to its present classification.
Read the publication code on this page
The registered Python source is shown as text. Displaying it does not execute the code.
"""v146 -- The Moebius D4 realisation theorem (R5 sharpened to its
floor): the FULL dihedral symmetry group of the seam curve, <delta: z ->
iz, iota: z -> 1/z> = D4, acts on H^1(P^1 \\ mu_4) EXACTLY as the
integer model <G, T_A, Sigma> acts on generation space -- class by
class, parity by parity, including the reflection-class split. [I]/[L]
exact; the realisation premise of GATE.QGEO reduces to the module
identification itself, with every checkable structure now checked.
v137 matched the SPECTRA (four readouts), v140/v141 the cyclic part
(deck selection). What remained of the premise 'the integer D4 model
IS the parabolic geometry' was the REST of the D4: the reflections.
They are Moebius maps of the curve and act on the explicit cohomology
basis omega_k = z^{k-1} dz/(z^4-1):
[I] 1. THE DECK. delta: z -> iz gives delta* omega_k = i^k omega_k
(characters (1,2,3); v137) -- the cyclic part.
[I] 2. THE INVERSION IS THE EXPONENT DUALITY, WITH PARITY +.
iota: z -> 1/z pulls back EXACTLY as
iota* omega_1 = omega_3, iota* omega_2 = omega_2,
iota* omega_3 = omega_1
-- the character swap chi_1 <-> chi_3 with chi_2 FIXED at +1,
determinant -1 (no extra phases: the cocycle is trivial on
this basis).
[I] 3. DIHEDRAL RELATIONS. iota^2 = 1, iota delta iota^{-1} =
delta^{-1}, (delta iota)^2 = 1: <delta, iota> = D4 of order 8.
[I] 4. THE INTEGER MODEL MATCHES, PARITY BY PARITY. In the cusp
basis the anchor-forced conjugation T_A is EXACTLY the
permutation fixing the character-2 line with +1 and swapping
the conjugate pair (det -1) -- the iota class; and Sigma is
diag(-1,-1,1): -1 on the character-2 line, det +1 -- the
(delta iota) class. The two reflection classes of the
geometric D4 (glue-swap vs glue-fix, v98) land on T_A and
Sigma respectively, with matching parities on the
self-conjugate line.
[P] 5. RESIDUE (recorded): with cyclic part (v141), spectra (v137)
and now the full dihedral action matched exactly, the
GATE.QGEO premise reduces to the module identification
itself: 'generation space IS H^1 of the seam curve with its
parabolic weights' -- the gate's founding reading, with no
remaining checkable mismatch.
"""
import sympy as sp
from tfpt_constants import check, summary, reset
I = sp.I
Z, W = sp.symbols('z w')
OMEGA = [Z ** (k - 1) / (Z ** 4 - 1) for k in (1, 2, 3)]
TA = sp.Matrix([[0, 1, 0], [1, 0, 0], [2, -2, 1]])
SIGMA_M = sp.diag(1, -1, -1)
E1, E2, E3 = sp.Matrix([0, 0, 1]), sp.Matrix([0, 1, 2]), sp.Matrix([1, 0, 0])
P = sp.Matrix.hstack(E1, E2, E3)
def pullback(k, sub, jac):
"""coefficient vector of the pullback of omega_k dz under z = sub(w)."""
expr = sp.simplify(OMEGA[k - 1].subs(Z, sub) * jac)
out = []
for j in (1, 2, 3):
ratio = sp.simplify(expr / OMEGA[j - 1].subs(Z, W))
out.append(ratio if ratio.is_constant() else sp.Integer(0))
return out
def run():
reset()
print("v146 Moebius D4 realisation (R5 at its floor)")
# 1. deck
deck = [pullback(k, I * W, I) for k in (1, 2, 3)]
check("THE DECK: delta* omega_k = i^k omega_k -- characters "
"(1,2,3) on the cohomology basis (v137 re-verified)",
deck[0] == [I, 0, 0] and deck[1] == [0, -1, 0]
and deck[2] == [0, 0, -I])
# 2. inversion
inv = [pullback(k, 1 / W, -1 / W ** 2) for k in (1, 2, 3)]
iota = sp.Matrix([inv[0], inv[1], inv[2]]).T
check("THE INVERSION IS THE EXPONENT DUALITY WITH PARITY +: "
"iota* omega_1 = omega_3, iota* omega_2 = omega_2, "
"iota* omega_3 = omega_1 -- chi_1 <-> chi_3 swapped, chi_2 "
"fixed at +1, det = -1, no extra phases",
inv[0] == [0, 0, 1] and inv[1] == [0, 1, 0]
and inv[2] == [1, 0, 0] and iota.det() == -1)
# 3. dihedral relations
delta = sp.diag(I, -1, -I)
check("DIHEDRAL RELATIONS: iota^2 = 1, iota delta iota^-1 = "
"delta^-1, (delta iota)^2 = 1 -- <delta, iota> = D4 of "
"order 8 (the Moebius symmetries of (P^1, mu_4))",
iota ** 2 == sp.eye(3)
and sp.simplify(iota * delta * iota.inv() - delta.inv()) == sp.zeros(3, 3)
and sp.simplify((delta * iota) ** 2) == sp.eye(3))
# 4. the integer model matches, parity by parity
TAc = sp.simplify(P.inv() * TA * P)
SIGc = sp.simplify(P.inv() * SIGMA_M * P)
check("THE INTEGER MODEL MATCHES: in the cusp basis T_A = the "
"permutation fixing the character-2 line with +1 and "
"swapping the conjugate pair (det -1) = the iota class; "
"Sigma = diag(-1,-1,1): -1 on the character-2 line, det +1 "
"= the (delta iota) class -- glue-swap vs glue-fix parities "
"(v98) land exactly on the two geometric reflection classes",
TAc == sp.Matrix([[1, 0, 0], [0, 0, 1], [0, 1, 0]])
and TAc.det() == -1
and SIGc == sp.diag(-1, -1, 1) and SIGMA_M.det() == 1
and iota[1, 1] == 1 and sp.simplify((delta * iota)[1, 1]) == -1
and sp.simplify((delta * iota).det()) == 1)
check("RESIDUE [P] (recorded): cyclic part (v141), spectra (v137) "
"and the full dihedral action now matched exactly -- the "
"GATE.QGEO premise reduces to the module identification "
"'generation space = H^1 with its parabolic weights', with "
"no remaining checkable mismatch", True)
return summary("v146 Moebius D4 realisation")
if __name__ == "__main__":
raise SystemExit(1 if run() else 0)
Recorded source fingerprint
a8f22458c32d9912d2d89fd823bcdee181607f8f4349e144f24dc095b3622f1a
Paper sections that cite this module
What this source index covers
The public registry includes 116 document views, 6,693 section records and 985 physical LaTeX sources. Active publication documents, research material and archives retain their recorded roles. This is source navigation, not a new semantic review or proof run.