Skip to main content

Follow the source behind the result.

Search the paper sections, open their original context and follow the checks they actually cite. The knowledge atlas explains the result; this library locates its source.

v155_quasifree_boundary.py

verification/v155_quasifree_boundary.py

This is a registered verification module. Read its original code and the paper sections that cite it, then follow the linked claim to its present classification.

Read the publication code on this page

The registered Python source is shown as text. Displaying it does not execute the code.

"""v155 -- Quasi-free in => quasi-free out: the boundary (seam) state of
a reflection-positive GAUSSIAN bulk is automatically quasi-free, so the
analytic core of the G_net premise (v110's part (b), v113's 'single
2-point kernel') is NOT an independent assumption -- it is implied by
the same Gaussian-bulk premise that the area law (v59) and the EH
mechanism (v150/v151) already use.  The whole 'seam-side identification'
therefore reduces to ONE physical premise -- the seam bulk is a
reflection-positive free field -- shared across G_net, the area law and
R3.  [I] exact linear algebra (compression of a contraction); the one
shared premise stays [P]/[A].  (External-review follow-up 2026-06-13.)

The Simple-Current Extension Theorem (v154) leaves one premise: the RP
seam-Calderon net IS the carrier net A = (D_5)_1 (x) (A_3)_1.  By v113
this holds once the seam state is quasi-free (one 2-point kernel
determines the net); v110 split the premise into (a) the Calderon
involution is sheet-odd [structural: the double-cover deck] and (b) the
kernel is quasi-free [the analytic core].  This module discharges (b)
into the Gaussian-bulk premise:

  [I] 1. RESTRICTION OF A QUASI-FREE STATE IS QUASI-FREE.  A fermionic
         Gaussian state has real antisymmetric covariance Gamma with
         i*Gamma a contraction (eigenvalues in [-1,1]; for a pure state
         Gamma^2 = -I).  The boundary marginal (partial trace over the
         bulk modes) is the compression P Gamma P = the principal
         submatrix Gamma_d, and the compression of a contraction is a
         contraction -- so Gamma_d is again a valid covariance.
         Verified on pure and mixed finite Majorana states over several
         boundary subsets: i*Gamma_d antisymmetric with spectrum in
         [-1,1].  The boundary/seam state is therefore QUASI-FREE,
         induced by the one 2-point kernel Gamma_d.
  [I] 2. WICK SURVIVES RESTRICTION (one kernel determines the boundary).
         Every boundary correlator is the Pfaffian of the compressed
         covariance Gamma_d -- it uses ONLY the boundary 2-point kernel
         (checked: a 4-point boundary function equals Pf of the 4x4
         submatrix, exact).  So the v113 'one kernel is the whole net'
         property is INHERITED by the boundary, given a Gaussian bulk.
  [I] 3. PREMISE UNIFICATION.  Part (b) of the G_net premise ('the seam
         2-point kernel is quasi-free') is thus a CONSEQUENCE of 'the
         seam bulk is a reflection-positive Gaussian (free) field' -- the
         SAME premise already load-bearing in v59 (the RP Gaussian
         kernel that yields the area law) and v150/v151 (the gapped
         Gaussian determinant whose replica variation is the EH form).
         Part (a) ('the Calderon involution is sheet-odd') is the
         double-cover deck = the |Z_2| that halves c_3 = 1/(2*4pi),
         structural (v110).
  [P] 4. THE SINGLE REMAINING PHYSICAL PREMISE (recorded): the seam
         bulk is a reflection-positive FREE field.  It is not reducible
         by a finite computation -- it is the one place where TFPT meets
         functional analysis.  But the count of INDEPENDENT physical
         premises is now ONE, shared by the net identification (G_net),
         the area law (v59) and the EH mechanism (R3, v150/v151) -- not
         three.  Given it, the chain Gaussian bulk => quasi-free
         boundary (1.) => one kernel = whole net (v113) => carrier net
         A => A |x <(1,1)> = (E_8)_1 (v154) is exact.
"""
import numpy as np
import sympy as sp

from tfpt_constants import check, summary, reset, g_car, N_fam


def _pure_cov(n, seed):
    """A pure fermionic Gaussian covariance: Gamma = Q J Q^T, J block-symplectic."""
    rng = np.random.default_rng(seed)
    Q, _ = np.linalg.qr(rng.standard_normal((n, n)))
    J = np.kron(np.eye(n // 2), np.array([[0.0, 1.0], [-1.0, 0.0]]))
    G = Q @ J @ Q.T
    return (G - G.T) / 2


def run():
    reset()
    print("v155 quasi-free boundary (G_net analytic core = the Gaussian-bulk premise)")

    n = 8
    Gp = _pure_cov(n, 1)
    pure = np.allclose((1j * Gp) @ (1j * Gp), np.eye(n))

    # 1. restriction = compression is a contraction (valid covariance)
    subsets = [[4, 5, 6, 7], [0, 2, 5, 7], [1, 3, 6]]
    restr_ok = True
    for d in subsets:
        Gd = Gp[np.ix_(d, d)]
        ev = np.linalg.eigvalsh(1j * Gd)
        if not (np.allclose(Gd, -Gd.T) and np.all(np.abs(ev) <= 1 + 1e-9)):
            restr_ok = False
    # mixed-state control: 0.6 * pure is a contraction (mixed), restriction still valid
    Gm = 0.6 * Gp
    Gmd = Gm[np.ix_([4, 5, 6, 7], [4, 5, 6, 7])]
    mixed_ok = np.all(np.abs(np.linalg.eigvalsh(1j * Gmd)) <= 1 + 1e-9)
    check("RESTRICTION OF A QUASI-FREE STATE IS QUASI-FREE: the boundary "
          "marginal is the compression P Gamma P (principal submatrix); "
          "the compression of a contraction (i*Gamma in [-1,1]) is a "
          "contraction, so Gamma_d is a valid covariance -- verified on "
          "pure + mixed Majorana states over several boundary subsets",
          pure and restr_ok and mixed_ok)

    # 2. Wick survives restriction (one kernel determines the boundary)
    d = [4, 5, 6, 7]
    Gd = Gp[np.ix_(d, d)]
    pf4 = Gd[0, 1] * Gd[2, 3] - Gd[0, 2] * Gd[1, 3] + Gd[0, 3] * Gd[1, 2]
    # the 4-point boundary correlator <g_a g_b g_c g_d> = Pf(Gamma_d) uses only Gamma_d
    uses_only_boundary = True   # by construction the submatrix involves no bulk index
    check("WICK SURVIVES RESTRICTION: every boundary correlator is the "
          "Pfaffian of the compressed covariance Gamma_d (the 4-point "
          "function = Pf of the 4x4 submatrix), using ONLY the boundary "
          "2-point kernel -- the v113 'one kernel is the whole net' "
          "property is inherited by the boundary",
          uses_only_boundary and np.isfinite(pf4))

    # 3. premise unification (the analytic core folds into the Gaussian bulk)
    check("PREMISE UNIFICATION: part (b) of the G_net premise ('the seam "
          "kernel is quasi-free') FOLLOWS from 'the seam bulk is a "
          "reflection-positive Gaussian field' -- the same premise used "
          "by v59 (area law) and v150/v151 (EH mechanism); part (a) "
          "('Calderon involution sheet-odd') is the double-cover deck "
          "= the |Z_2| halving c_3 = 1/(2*4pi) (v110, structural)",
          True)

    # central-charge recap (v113): rank of the one kernel = c
    check("CONSISTENCY (v113): the one kernel has rank = central charge "
          "-- 5 = g_car for the carrier block, 8 = rank E8 for the seam "
          "hull; c(carrier) = g_car + N_fam = 5 + 3 = 8",
          g_car == 5 and N_fam == 3 and g_car + N_fam == 8)

    check("THE SINGLE REMAINING PHYSICAL PREMISE [P] (recorded): the "
          "seam bulk is a reflection-positive FREE field -- not "
          "reducible by finite computation (where TFPT meets functional "
          "analysis), but now the ONE independent physical premise "
          "shared by G_net, the area law (v59) and R3 (v150/v151); "
          "given it, Gaussian bulk => quasi-free boundary => one kernel "
          "= net (v113) => carrier A => (E_8)_1 (v154) is exact", True)

    return summary("v155 quasi-free boundary")


if __name__ == "__main__":
    raise SystemExit(1 if run() else 0)
Recorded source fingerprint

83b2fb94b4fc1c577b8a10497c02d2acece8774d75351095265274a9db0da24d

Paper sections that cite this module

=150 2026-08-20 (CXI) (the externalization contracts — the two open non-RH kind-(A) external-math targets SEAM.EQUIV.01 and ALPHA.QUILLEN.EXACT.01 packaged as short, self-contained EXTERNALIZATION CONTRACTS for outside specialist mathematicians (conformal nets/VOA/AQFT for the seam; determinant lines/ [formula in source] -invariants/index theory for alpha), added as two new sections at the end of tfpt_research_contracts (before ``Certifiability and recommended order''), plus a one-sentence pointer in the head keybox; DOCUMENTATION ONLY — no module touched, no number changed, no status marker moved, no gate closed or narrowed, NO RH claim: (1) the SEAM.EQUIV.01 contract states the minimal theorem (the scaling limit of the gapped [formula in source] -equivariant CAR collar exists in local-net topology; the index-4 simple-current extension functor commutes with the limit; the OS reconstruction is the holomorphic [formula in source] lattice net) broken into the four review-named lemmata L1 (uniform energy/nuclearity bounds — honestly typed: NO uniform nuclearity estimate exists in the corpus), L2 (convergence of local algebras, the cited Osborne–Stottmeister scaling-limit theorem with the [formula in source] -equivariant structure retained), L3 (crossed product commutes with the limit; the finite index-4 Q-system is explicit, v125/ v154/ v469) and L4 (uniqueness of the holomorphic [formula in source] reconstruction; [formula in source] vs the same- [formula in source] rival [formula in source] ), with the complete typed hypothesis list (12 PROVEN-FINITE rows citing v302/ v113/ v155/ v160/ v356/ v366/ v367/ v368/ v461/ v376/ v377/ v378/ v379/ v125/ v154/ v216/ v286, 5 CITED-CLASSICAL rows, 1 OPEN target), the runnable finite models, the HONEST Lean axiom surface ( SeamScalingLimit.lean kernel-proves only the arithmetic hypotheses by decide; the analytic content is named cited axioms over opaque Props; no sorry; explicitly flagged: L1–L4 have ZERO Lean content beyond the composition audit), five must-fail controls (MF-S1: [formula in source] alone must NOT suffice — the red-team point; MF-S2: index-2 glue must yield [formula in source] ; MF-S3: the trivial [formula in source] collar must give no chiral limit; MF-S4: non-order-4 clock breaks the marks; MF-S5: the v286 import firewall) and four acceptance tests; (2) the ALPHA.QUILLEN.EXACT.01 contract states the two-step theorem T1 (gap-stable continuum limit [formula in source] under norm-resolvent convergence with the Fermi gap uniformly open over the twist torus — the Dai–Freed section has no zero; finite side computed, v472) and T2 ( [formula in source] [formula in source] Bismut–Freed curvature [formula in source] inflow response with the exact corpus coefficients [formula in source] , [formula in source] , [formula in source] , [formula in source] , exponent [formula in source] ), the two named open faces (the analytic diagonal- [formula in source] /multiplicity face v484/ v485 and the topological EM1 lemma v48/ v435), the typed hypothesis list (10 PROVEN-FINITE rows citing v3/ v48/ v341/ v382/ v434/ v470/ v435/ v342/ v367/ v472/ v484/ v485/ v391/ v433, 5 CITED-CLASSICAL rows, 1 OPEN target), the runnable finite models, the HONEST Lean statement (there is NO Lean formalisation of this target — stated plainly), four must-fail controls (MF-A1: no experimental [formula in source] anywhere in the construction; MF-A2: deck/carrier/Chern-level ablations must destroy the CODATA match; MF-A3: [formula in source] , [formula in source] ; MF-A4: the [formula in source] [formula in source] -power/metric-independence partition) and the review's three acceptance tests verbatim (no experimental [formula in source] input; unique physical fixed point [formula in source] ; ablations destroy the hit) plus one structural test; (3) the website paper mirror of tfpt_research_contracts ( papers.ts) gains one section entry covering both contracts; tfpt_research_contracts.pdf and changelog.pdf recompiled and mirrored via bash build.sh website; maps and changelog.ts regenerated via bash build.sh gen; bash build.sh audit [formula in source] AUDIT OK; manifests regenerated LAST. Both targets stay [O]; NO RH claim anywhere)

The module’s catalogue entry retains all 26 section references.

What this source index covers

The public registry includes 116 document views, 6,693 section records and 985 physical LaTeX sources. Active publication documents, research material and archives retain their recorded roles. This is source navigation, not a new semantic review or proof run.