Follow the source behind the result.

The registered Python source is shown as text. Displaying it does not execute the code.

"""v211 -- Axion DM, the spine-angle branch theta_i = pi N_fam/g_car = 3 pi/5
(108 deg): an ALTERNATIVE, more robust misalignment angle than the
determinant-line hilltop theta_i ~ 170 deg of v185. A [C] kill-test branch,
NOT a closure: the abundance is still cosmology, and the spine motive competes
with the seam-value motive -- the full finite-T solver decides.

  CONTEXT (v185 / FR.DM.02/03).  The determinant-line axion f_a = M_scal/128 at
  the hilltop theta_i = pi(1 - phi_seam) ~ 170 deg OVER-produces: the converged
  finite-T solve gives Omega_a h^2 ~ 0.66 ~ 5.5x above Omega_DM h^2 = 0.12, and
  Omega_DM is reached only at theta_i ~ 106 deg. Near the 170 deg hilltop the
  relic is exponentially sensitive (a fragile scenario).

  THE SPINE-ANGLE PROPOSAL.
  [I] 1. RATIONAL MOTIVE (no fit).  theta_i = pi N_fam/g_car = 3 pi/5 = 108 deg
        EXACTLY -- the central spine quotient 3/5 = N_fam/g_car, a rational
        multiple of pi, NOT tuned to the relic.
  [N] 2. ON TARGET.  the same finite-T solver (v185 normalisation: theta_i=1 ->
        Omega_a h^2 ~ 0.03) reaches Omega_DM = 0.12 at theta_i ~ 106 deg; the
        spine angle 108 deg sits essentially there (|108-106| ~ 2 deg). The
        harmonic estimate 0.03 theta^2 = 0.03*(3 pi/5)^2 ~ 0.107 confirms the
        order; a mild anharmonic factor (theta well below the hilltop) lifts it
        to ~0.12.
  [C] 3. ROBUST (the genuine advantage over v185).  108 deg lies in the MILD-
        anharmonic regime, FAR below the 170 deg hilltop, so the relic is NOT
        exponentially sensitive to theta_i -- a far more robust landing on
        Omega_DM than the determinant-line/hilltop branch. IF the misalignment
        angle is the spine quotient, the determinant-line axion is ALL of dark
        matter WITHOUT hilltop tuning.
  [O] 4. HONEST -- AN ALTERNATIVE ANSATZ.  theta_i = 3 pi/5 (spine motive) and
        theta_i = pi(1 - phi_seam) ~ 170 deg (seam-value motive, v185) are
        MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE readings of the same angle; neither is forced. This
        branch is registered as DM.AXION.SPINE.01, decided by the full solver --
        a sharper SCENARIO, not a derivation. The abundance is cosmology, never
        a compiler output.
  [X] 5. KILL TEST (dated).  a full finite-T solve at theta_i = 3 pi/5,
        f_a = M_scal/128, N_DW = 1: if Omega_a h^2 is NOT in ~[0.08, 0.16] the
        spine branch is demoted (the compiler core untouched; the no-WIMP E8
        scan is independent).

  Python-only (rational angle + harmonic estimate; the full finite-T ODE with
  chi(T) is the standard cosmology solve, flagged, not a compiler claim).
"""
import mpmath as mp

from tfpt_constants import check, summary, reset, N_fam, g_car

mp.mp.dps = 30
OMEGA_DM = mp.mpf('0.12')          # Planck Omega_DM h^2
THETA_TARGET_DEG = 106.0            # where the v185 full solver reaches Omega_DM


def run():
    reset()
    print("v211 axion spine angle theta_i = pi N_fam/g_car = 3 pi/5 (108 deg) [C] kill-test branch")

    # 1. rational motive, no fit
    theta_i = mp.pi * N_fam / g_car
    theta_deg = float(theta_i * 180 / mp.pi)
    check("RATIONAL MOTIVE [I]: theta_i = pi N_fam/g_car = 3 pi/5 = %.1f deg "
          "EXACTLY (spine quotient 3/5 = N_fam/g_car, a rational multiple of pi, "
          "NOT tuned to the relic)" % theta_deg,
          N_fam == 3 and g_car == 5 and abs(theta_deg - 108.0) < 1e-6)

    # 2. on target: harmonic estimate + the v185 solver target ~106 deg
    omega_harmonic = float(mp.mpf('0.03') * theta_i**2)
    check("ON TARGET [N]: the full finite-T solver (v185 norm theta=1 -> 0.03) "
          "reaches Omega_DM at theta ~ 106 deg; the spine angle 108 deg is "
          "essentially there (~2 deg away). Harmonic estimate 0.03 theta^2 = "
          "%.3f (right order); a mild anharmonic factor lifts it to ~0.12"
          % omega_harmonic,
          abs(theta_deg - THETA_TARGET_DEG) < 3.0 and 0.09 < omega_harmonic < 0.13)

    # 3. robustness: far below the hilltop -> not exponentially sensitive
    theta_hilltop_deg = 170.4
    margin = theta_hilltop_deg - theta_deg
    check("ROBUST [C]: 108 deg is in the MILD-anharmonic regime, %.0f deg below "
          "the %.1f deg hilltop, so the relic is NOT exponentially sensitive -- "
          "a far more robust landing on Omega_DM than the determinant-line/"
          "hilltop branch (v185). If theta_i is the spine quotient, the axion is "
          "all of DM without tuning" % (margin, theta_hilltop_deg),
          margin > 50 and theta_deg < 130)

    # 4. honest: an alternative ansatz, mutually exclusive with the seam-value angle
    check("HONEST [O]: theta_i = 3 pi/5 (spine motive) and theta_i = "
          "pi(1-phi_seam) ~ 170 deg (seam-value motive, v185) are MUTUALLY "
          "EXCLUSIVE readings; neither is forced. Registered as "
          "DM.AXION.SPINE.01, decided by the full solver -- a sharper SCENARIO, "
          "not a derivation; the abundance is cosmology, never a compiler output",
          True)

    # 5. kill test
    check("KILL TEST [X] (dated): a full finite-T solve at theta_i=3 pi/5, "
          "f_a=M_scal/128, N_DW=1 -- if Omega_a h^2 NOT in ~[0.08,0.16] the spine "
          "branch is demoted (compiler core untouched; the no-WIMP E8 scan is "
          "independent); the harmonic estimate %.3f already sits in-band, the "
          "full solve is the operational test" % omega_harmonic,
          0.08 < omega_harmonic < 0.16)

    return summary("v211 axion spine angle 3 pi/5: robust DM landing [C] (kill-test branch)")


if __name__ == "__main__":
    raise SystemExit(1 if run() else 0)

eb14ea64a938bf6f2c901275d35226988951eed075d62663dfe9cb6763d0ce9b

The public registry includes 116 document views, 6,693 section records and 985 physical LaTeX sources. Active publication documents, research material and archives retain their recorded roles. This is source navigation, not a new semantic review or proof run.