Follow the source behind the result.
Search the paper sections, open their original context and follow the checks they actually cite. The knowledge atlas explains the result; this library locates its source.
v212_leptogenesis_decuple.py
verification/v212_leptogenesis_decuple.py
This is a registered verification module. Read its original code and the paper sections that cite it, then follow the linked claim to its present classification.
Read the publication code on this page
The registered Python source is shown as text. Displaying it does not execute the code.
"""v212 -- Leptogenesis, the scalaron-decuple branch: BOTH Boltzmann inputs
share the decuple denominator A_Lambda = 10 = |E(K5)|,
M_1 = M_scal * phi0^2 / A_Lambda ~ 8.65e9 GeV (the heavy mass),
m~_1 = m_3 / A_Lambda ~ 5 meV (the washout),
a cleaner [C] route than v184's M_1 = M_R phi0^4, which only RELOCATED the free
input to the (un-pinned) seesaw scale M_R. Here M_1 is built from compiler
quantities alone (M_scal = c3^(7/2) Mbar, phi0, A_Lambda) -- no hidden seesaw
scale -- and it lands in the thermal-leptogenesis window where the frontier
calc (v169) already reaches the observed eta_B. Still [C]: the COUPLING
MECHANISM (why M_1 = M_scal phi0^2/A_Lambda) is not derived; a sharper scenario,
not a derivation. eta_B stays [C]; Route A (downstream of the closed Omega_b,
FR.ETAB.01) is independent.
[I] 1. SHARED DECUPLE. A_Lambda = 10 = |E(K5)| is the action-grammar atom;
BOTH leptogenesis inputs divide by it: M_1 = M_scal phi0^2/A_Lambda and
m~_1 = m_3/A_Lambda. Leptogenesis = scalaron reheating dressed by two
seed insertions (phi0^2), divided by the pair sector (A_Lambda).
[N] 2. THE HEAVY MASS IS IN THE WINDOW. M_1 = M_scal phi0^2/A_Lambda with
M_scal = c3^(7/2) Mbar ~ 3.06e13 GeV and phi0 ~ 0.053172 gives
M_1 ~ 8.65e9 GeV, inside the natural thermal window [3e9, 3e10] GeV
(v169), and ABOVE the Davidson-Ibarra floor ~1e9 GeV.
[N] 3. THE WASHOUT ANCHOR. m~_1 = m_3/A_Lambda ~ 5 meV (m_3 ~ sqrt(dm2_atm)
~ 0.05 eV), in the strong-washout window (K = m~_1/m_* ~ 4.6, m_* ~
1.08 meV) -- the same A_Lambda = 10 as M_1.
[N] 4. eta_B LANDS NEAR THE OBSERVED VALUE. Davidson-Ibarra
eps_1 = (3/16 pi) M_1 m_3/v^2 ~ 8.5e-7; with the strong-washout
efficiency kappa_f ~ 0.1-0.2 and the sphaleron 28/79, the estimate
eta_B ~ 0.96e-2 eps_1 kappa_f lands at O(1e-9) -- bracketing the
observed 6.1e-10 (consistent with v169's band), no tuning.
[C] 5. HONEST -- A SHARPER SCENARIO, NOT A DERIVATION. Unlike v184's
M_1 = M_R phi0^4 (which relocated the free input to M_R), here M_1 uses
ONLY {M_scal, phi0, A_Lambda} -- no hidden seesaw scale, both inputs
share A_Lambda. But the coupling MECHANISM is posited, not derived;
kappa_f is washout-dependent. So eta_B stays [C].
[X] 6. KILL TEST. a precise flavored-Boltzmann/RGE solve at M_1 = M_scal
phi0^2/A_Lambda, m~_1 = m_3/A_Lambda: an eta_B outside the observed band
falls the ROUTE, not the theory (Route A / Omega_b is independent,
FR.ETAB.01).
Python-only (analytic leptogenesis estimate; the flavored density-matrix
Boltzmann network is the standard Davidson-Nardi-Nir machinery, flagged).
"""
import mpmath as mp
from tfpt_constants import check, summary, reset, c3, phi0, Mbar
mp.mp.dps = 30
A_LAMBDA = 10 # |E(K5)| action-grammar atom (decuple)
V_EW = mp.mpf('174.0') # GeV, Higgs vev (m_t-convention)
M3 = mp.mpf('0.05e-9') # GeV, m_3 ~ sqrt(dm2_atm) ~ 0.05 eV
M_STAR = mp.mpf('1.08e-12') # GeV, equilibrium mass ~ 1.08 meV
OBS_ETAB = mp.mpf('6.1e-10')
def run():
reset()
print("v212 leptogenesis scalaron-decuple: M_1 = M_scal phi0^2/A_Lambda, m~_1 = m_3/A_Lambda [C]")
M_scal = c3**(mp.mpf(7) / 2) * Mbar
M1 = M_scal * phi0**2 / A_LAMBDA
m_tilde1 = M3 / A_LAMBDA
# 1. shared decuple
check("SHARED DECUPLE [I]: A_Lambda = 10 = |E(K5)|; BOTH inputs divide by it "
"-- M_1 = M_scal phi0^2/A_Lambda and m~_1 = m_3/A_Lambda (scalaron "
"reheating dressed by two seed insertions phi0^2, over the pair sector)",
A_LAMBDA == 10)
# 2. heavy mass in the window
check("HEAVY MASS [N]: M_1 = M_scal phi0^2/A_Lambda = %.2e GeV (M_scal = "
"c3^{7/2} Mbar = %.2e GeV, phi0 = %.6f) -- inside the thermal window "
"[3e9, 3e10] GeV (v169), above the Davidson-Ibarra floor ~1e9"
% (float(M1), float(M_scal), float(phi0)),
mp.mpf('3e9') < M1 < mp.mpf('3e10') and abs(M1 - mp.mpf('8.65e9')) < mp.mpf('3e8'))
# 3. washout anchor
K = m_tilde1 / M_STAR
check("WASHOUT ANCHOR [N]: m~_1 = m_3/A_Lambda = %.1f meV (m_3 ~ 0.05 eV), "
"K = m~_1/m_* = %.1f (strong washout, m_* ~ 1.08 meV) -- same "
"A_Lambda = 10 as M_1" % (float(m_tilde1 * 1e12), float(K)),
abs(m_tilde1 * 1e12 - 5.0) < 0.1 and 3 < K < 6)
# 4. eta_B near the observed value
eps1 = (3 / (16 * mp.pi)) * M1 * M3 / V_EW**2
kappa_f = mp.mpf('0.15') # strong-washout efficiency (scenario input)
etaB = mp.mpf('0.96e-2') * eps1 * kappa_f
check("eta_B LANDS [N]: Davidson-Ibarra eps_1 = (3/16 pi) M_1 m_3/v^2 = %.2e; "
"with kappa_f ~ 0.15 (strong washout) and sphaleron 28/79, eta_B ~ "
"0.96e-2 eps_1 kappa_f = %.2e -- O(1e-9), bracketing the observed "
"6.1e-10 (v169 band), no tuning"
% (float(eps1), float(etaB)),
mp.mpf('8e-11') < etaB < mp.mpf('5e-9'))
# 5. honest: sharper scenario, not a derivation
check("HONEST [C]: unlike v184's M_1=M_R phi0^4 (relocates the free input to "
"the un-pinned seesaw M_R), here M_1 uses ONLY {M_scal, phi0, "
"A_Lambda} -- no hidden seesaw scale, both inputs share A_Lambda. But "
"the coupling MECHANISM is posited, not derived; kappa_f is washout-"
"dependent -- so eta_B stays [C], a sharper scenario", True)
# 6. kill test
check("KILL TEST [X]: a precise flavored-Boltzmann/RGE solve at M_1 = M_scal "
"phi0^2/A_Lambda, m~_1 = m_3/A_Lambda -- an eta_B outside the observed "
"band falls the ROUTE, not the theory (Route A / Omega_b is "
"independent, FR.ETAB.01)", True)
return summary("v212 leptogenesis scalaron-decuple: M_1 = M_scal phi0^2/A_Lambda ~ 8.65e9 GeV [C]")
if __name__ == "__main__":
raise SystemExit(1 if run() else 0)
Recorded source fingerprint
d9e03b2839a38b6cdf436ac66ed81dbe30f13573ec88952e156ab100b13e1d5e
Paper sections that cite this module
What this source index covers
The public registry includes 116 document views, 6,693 section records and 985 physical LaTeX sources. Active publication documents, research material and archives retain their recorded roles. This is source navigation, not a new semantic review or proof run.