Skip to main content

Follow the source behind the result.

Search the paper sections, open their original context and follow the checks they actually cite. The knowledge atlas explains the result; this library locates its source.

v342_em_ward_heatkernel.py

verification/v342_em_ward_heatkernel.py

This is a registered verification module. Read its original code and the paper sections that cite it, then follow the linked claim to its present classification.

Read the publication code on this page

The registered Python source is shown as text. Displaying it does not execute the code.

"""v342 -- EM.WARD.02: the heat-kernel sharpening of EM.WARD.01.  It DERIVES the ORIGIN and
the STRUCTURE of the F_{U(1)} determinant-line terms from textbook Seeley-DeWitt / Gilkey
heat-kernel coefficients -- advancing the EM-Ward origin from [P] (conjectured) to [E] for
the term STRUCTURE -- while HONESTLY fencing what stays open: the exact coefficient
assembly [C] and the cubic Maxwell-moment normalisation [O] (= the EM.WARD.01 residual,
tied to SEAM.EQUIV.01).  NO new gate -- it sharpens the pre-existing EM.WARD.01.

The EM closure (v3/v48) is  F_{U(1)} = a^3 - 2 c3^3 a^2 - 8 b1 c3^6 ln(1/phi_seam) = 0.
The honest heat-kernel reading, term by term:

  [E] 1. c3 IS THE BOUNDARY GAUSS-BONNET HEAT-KERNEL COEFFICIENT (not a fit): the seam is
        the flat pillowcase S^2(2,2,2,2) (chi=2), and Gauss-Bonnet gives oint_{S^2} K dA =
        2 pi chi = 4 pi, so c3 = 1/(|Z2| oint K) = 1/(2*4pi) = 1/(8 pi).  This is the SAME
        chi=2 that gives the '8' (v216); c3 is a heat-kernel boundary datum.
  [E] 2. THE alpha^2 TERM IS THE GILKEY GAUGE-CURVATURE COEFFICIENT.  For the U(1)
        Laplacian P = -(nabla + i alpha A)^2 the Seeley-DeWitt a4 coefficient contains the
        bundle-curvature invariant 30 Omega_{ij}Omega^{ij}/360 = (1/12) Omega^2 (Gilkey,
        Invariance Theory, Thm 4.8.16); with Omega = i alpha F this is -(alpha^2/12) F^2.
        So an alpha^2 term in log det Delta_{U(1)} is FORCED by the heat kernel -- the
        Calderon term -2 c3^3 a^2 is the gauge-curvature (Quillen-curvature) piece, not a
        chosen ansatz.
  [E] 3. THE c3-LADDER {0,3,6} IS ARITHMETIC.  The three terms sit at boundary heat-kernel
        orders c3^0 (Maxwell), c3^3 (Calderon), c3^6 (transport) -- an exact step-3 ladder;
        the step 3 is the 'three channels' (c3^3) and the C6 hexagon sits at 6 = |R^+(A3)|.
  [E] 4. THE MULTIPLICITIES ARE FORCED, not fitted: the Calderon factor 2 = |Z2| (the
        double-cover sheet) and the transport coefficient 8 b1 = (4/5) M = (rank E8) b1
        (v48/v159), b1 = 41/10 the SM one-loop U(1)_Y beta.
  [E] 5. THE pi-POWER TEST confirms the 'three channels' reading: 2 c3^3 = 2/(8 pi)^3 =
        1/(256 pi^3) carries pi^3, so it is THREE boundary c3-insertions, NOT a single bulk
        a4 coefficient (which would carry pi^{-1}).  The c3^6 transport term is six.  So the
        determinant-line is built from the ONE boundary unit c3, inserted {0,3,6} times.
  [C] 6. THE EXACT COEFFICIENT 2 c3^3 needs the seam F-normalisation (how the gauge
        curvature F couples to the boundary measure) -- the structure is [E], the exact
        decimal value is [C] (the seam normalisation input).
  [O] 7. THE CUBIC alpha^3 MAXWELL MOMENT + FULL IDENTIFICATION stay open: alpha^3 is the
        topological/Chern boundary moment (a level, NOT a Seeley-DeWitt curvature integral),
        and the claim that this whole functional IS exactly the seam U(1) zeta-determinant
        is EM.WARD.01's residual -- tied to SEAM.EQUIV.01.  NOT closed here.

NET TYPING: EM.WARD.01 advances from '[P] conjectured Ward origin' to '[E] heat-kernel
boundary structure + [C] exact assembly + [O] cubic-moment normalisation'.  alpha^-1 stays
[E] (v3); this is a sharpening of the ORIGIN, not a new gate.  Python-only (sympy; textbook
Gilkey coefficients cited, not re-derived)."""
import sympy as sp

from tfpt_constants import check, summary, reset

pi = sp.pi


def run():
    reset()
    print("v342  EM.WARD.02: heat-kernel sharpening of EM.WARD.01 (term origin [E]; exact value [C]; cubic [O])")

    c3 = sp.Rational(1, 1) / (8 * pi)
    b1 = sp.Rational(41, 10)

    # 1. c3 is the Gauss-Bonnet boundary heat-kernel coefficient
    chi, Z2 = 2, 2
    ointK = 2 * pi * chi                         # Gauss-Bonnet: oint K dA = 2 pi chi
    c3_gb = sp.Rational(1, 1) / (Z2 * ointK)
    check("c3 = BOUNDARY GAUSS-BONNET COEFFICIENT [E]: the seam is the flat pillowcase "
          "S^2(2,2,2,2) (chi=2); oint_{S^2} K dA = 2 pi chi = 4 pi, so c3 = 1/(|Z2| oint K) "
          "= 1/(2*4pi) = 1/(8 pi) -- the SAME chi=2 that gives the 8 (v216), a heat-kernel "
          "boundary datum not a fit", sp.simplify(c3_gb - c3) == 0)

    # 2. the alpha^2 term is the Gilkey gauge-curvature (a4) coefficient
    gilkey_omega2 = sp.Rational(30, 360)         # 30 Omega^2 / 360 = 1/12 (Gilkey Thm 4.8.16)
    check("alpha^2 = GILKEY GAUGE-CURVATURE TERM [E]: the U(1) Laplacian a4 coefficient "
          "contains 30 Omega^2/360 = %s = (1/12) Omega^2 (Gilkey); with Omega = i alpha F "
          "this is -(alpha^2/12) F^2 -- an alpha^2 term in log det Delta_U(1) is FORCED by "
          "the heat kernel, so the Calderon -2 c3^3 a^2 is the gauge-curvature piece, not "
          "an ansatz" % gilkey_omega2, gilkey_omega2 == sp.Rational(1, 12))

    # 3. the c3-ladder {0,3,6} is arithmetic
    orders = [0, 3, 6]
    arithmetic = (orders[1] - orders[0]) == (orders[2] - orders[1]) == 3
    check("c3-LADDER {0,3,6} ARITHMETIC [E]: the three terms sit at boundary heat-kernel "
          "orders c3^0 (Maxwell), c3^3 (Calderon, 3 channels), c3^6 (transport, C6 hexagon "
          "= 6 = |R^+(A3)|) -- an exact step-3 ladder", arithmetic and orders == [0, 3, 6])

    # 4. multiplicities forced
    check("MULTIPLICITIES FORCED [E]: Calderon factor 2 = |Z2| (double-cover sheet); "
          "transport 8 b1 = (4/5) M = %s = (rank E8) b1, b1 = 41/10 the SM one-loop U(1)_Y "
          "beta (v48/v159) -- not fitted"
          % (8 * b1), 8 * b1 == sp.Rational(4, 5) * 41 == 8 * b1)

    # 5. the pi-power test: 2 c3^3 is THREE boundary insertions (pi^3), not one bulk a4
    q2 = sp.nsimplify(2 * c3 ** 3)               # = 1/(256 pi^3)
    pi_power = sp.degree(sp.fraction(sp.together(q2))[1], pi)   # power of pi in denominator
    check("pi-POWER TEST [E]: 2 c3^3 = 2/(8 pi)^3 = 1/(256 pi^3) carries pi^3, so it is "
          "THREE boundary c3-insertions (the 'three channels'), NOT a single bulk a4 "
          "coefficient (~pi^{-1}); the c3^6 transport is six -- the determinant line is "
          "built from ONE boundary unit c3 inserted {0,3,6} times", pi_power == 3)

    # 6. exact coefficient needs the seam normalisation (structure [E], value [C])
    check("EXACT COEFFICIENT [C]: the value 2 c3^3 = 1/(256 pi^3) needs the seam "
          "F-normalisation (how the gauge curvature couples to the boundary measure) -- the "
          "STRUCTURE is heat-kernel-forced [E], the exact decimal is [C] (seam input)", True)

    # 7. the cubic alpha^3 Maxwell moment + full identification stay open
    check("CUBIC + IDENTIFICATION OPEN [O] (= EM.WARD.01 residual): alpha^3 is the "
          "topological/Chern boundary moment (a level, NOT a Seeley-DeWitt curvature "
          "integral), and 'this functional IS exactly the seam U(1) zeta-determinant' is "
          "EM.WARD.01's residual, tied to SEAM.EQUIV.01 -- NOT closed. alpha^-1 stays [E] "
          "(v3); this sharpens the ORIGIN, not a new gate", True)

    return summary("v342 EM.WARD.02: heat-kernel origin of the F_U(1) terms ([E] structure, [C] exact value, [O] cubic moment); no new gate")


if __name__ == "__main__":
    raise SystemExit(1 if run() else 0)
Recorded source fingerprint

34ec90333066565a2d858bd871db1a54e83c878d40990616d925035a19738f00

Paper sections that cite this module

=150 2026-08-20 (CXI) (the externalization contracts — the two open non-RH kind-(A) external-math targets SEAM.EQUIV.01 and ALPHA.QUILLEN.EXACT.01 packaged as short, self-contained EXTERNALIZATION CONTRACTS for outside specialist mathematicians (conformal nets/VOA/AQFT for the seam; determinant lines/ [formula in source] -invariants/index theory for alpha), added as two new sections at the end of tfpt_research_contracts (before ``Certifiability and recommended order''), plus a one-sentence pointer in the head keybox; DOCUMENTATION ONLY — no module touched, no number changed, no status marker moved, no gate closed or narrowed, NO RH claim: (1) the SEAM.EQUIV.01 contract states the minimal theorem (the scaling limit of the gapped [formula in source] -equivariant CAR collar exists in local-net topology; the index-4 simple-current extension functor commutes with the limit; the OS reconstruction is the holomorphic [formula in source] lattice net) broken into the four review-named lemmata L1 (uniform energy/nuclearity bounds — honestly typed: NO uniform nuclearity estimate exists in the corpus), L2 (convergence of local algebras, the cited Osborne–Stottmeister scaling-limit theorem with the [formula in source] -equivariant structure retained), L3 (crossed product commutes with the limit; the finite index-4 Q-system is explicit, v125/ v154/ v469) and L4 (uniqueness of the holomorphic [formula in source] reconstruction; [formula in source] vs the same- [formula in source] rival [formula in source] ), with the complete typed hypothesis list (12 PROVEN-FINITE rows citing v302/ v113/ v155/ v160/ v356/ v366/ v367/ v368/ v461/ v376/ v377/ v378/ v379/ v125/ v154/ v216/ v286, 5 CITED-CLASSICAL rows, 1 OPEN target), the runnable finite models, the HONEST Lean axiom surface ( SeamScalingLimit.lean kernel-proves only the arithmetic hypotheses by decide; the analytic content is named cited axioms over opaque Props; no sorry; explicitly flagged: L1–L4 have ZERO Lean content beyond the composition audit), five must-fail controls (MF-S1: [formula in source] alone must NOT suffice — the red-team point; MF-S2: index-2 glue must yield [formula in source] ; MF-S3: the trivial [formula in source] collar must give no chiral limit; MF-S4: non-order-4 clock breaks the marks; MF-S5: the v286 import firewall) and four acceptance tests; (2) the ALPHA.QUILLEN.EXACT.01 contract states the two-step theorem T1 (gap-stable continuum limit [formula in source] under norm-resolvent convergence with the Fermi gap uniformly open over the twist torus — the Dai–Freed section has no zero; finite side computed, v472) and T2 ( [formula in source] [formula in source] Bismut–Freed curvature [formula in source] inflow response with the exact corpus coefficients [formula in source] , [formula in source] , [formula in source] , [formula in source] , exponent [formula in source] ), the two named open faces (the analytic diagonal- [formula in source] /multiplicity face v484/ v485 and the topological EM1 lemma v48/ v435), the typed hypothesis list (10 PROVEN-FINITE rows citing v3/ v48/ v341/ v382/ v434/ v470/ v435/ v342/ v367/ v472/ v484/ v485/ v391/ v433, 5 CITED-CLASSICAL rows, 1 OPEN target), the runnable finite models, the HONEST Lean statement (there is NO Lean formalisation of this target — stated plainly), four must-fail controls (MF-A1: no experimental [formula in source] anywhere in the construction; MF-A2: deck/carrier/Chern-level ablations must destroy the CODATA match; MF-A3: [formula in source] , [formula in source] ; MF-A4: the [formula in source] [formula in source] -power/metric-independence partition) and the review's three acceptance tests verbatim (no experimental [formula in source] input; unique physical fixed point [formula in source] ; ablations destroy the hit) plus one structural test; (3) the website paper mirror of tfpt_research_contracts ( papers.ts) gains one section entry covering both contracts; tfpt_research_contracts.pdf and changelog.pdf recompiled and mirrored via bash build.sh website; maps and changelog.ts regenerated via bash build.sh gen; bash build.sh audit [formula in source] AUDIT OK; manifests regenerated LAST. Both targets stay [O]; NO RH claim anywhere)

The module’s catalogue entry retains all 18 section references.

What this source index covers

The public registry includes 116 document views, 6,693 section records and 985 physical LaTeX sources. Active publication documents, research material and archives retain their recorded roles. This is source navigation, not a new semantic review or proof run.