Follow the source behind the result.

The registered Python source is shown as text. Displaying it does not execute the code.

"""v371 -- FR.POLE.SOLVE.01 (Track 3, F_transfer): the Koide source->pole transfer as a TYPED
solver -- promotes the experiments/ftransfer/koide_source_to_pole solve into the ledger with a
kill criterion.  It does NOT re-prove the 53/54 operator factor (v183, [E]) or the Q*=2/3
attractor (v82/v101, [E]); it answers the one honest question those leave open: is the PHYSICAL
source->pole transfer ordinary QED/EW running?  Answer (a clean NEGATIVE): NO.

Source (TFPT phi0-ladder ratios, v93): m_e:m_mu:m_tau = 16/7 phi0^5 : 4/3 phi0^3 : 7/6 phi0^2
=> Q_src = 0.6644638 (0.33% BELOW 2/3).  Pole (PDG 2024): Q_pole = 0.6666645 (= 2/3 to 3e-6).
RG-resummed QED freezes the high-scale mass ratios to m_i ~ M_i^(1+eps), eps = (3/2)(alpha/pi),
so the whole running family is the one-parameter curve Q(eps) with Q(0) = Q_pole.

  [E] 1. THE FAMOUS COINCIDENCE.  Q_pole = Koide(PDG poles) = 2/3 to 3e-6; the phi0-ladder
        source sits 0.33% BELOW (Q_src = 0.66446).
  [E] 2. QED RUNS THE WRONG WAY.  dQ/deps > 0 at the pole -- more QED running WIDENS the
        hierarchy and pushes Q ABOVE 2/3 (Q(eps_QED) > 2/3), away from the source.
  [E] 3. THE REQUIRED eps IS NEGATIVE.  the eps that maps Q_pole -> Q_src is NEGATIVE
        (brentq), while QED gives eps = +(3/2)(alpha/pi) > 0 -- the WRONG SIGN, for any
        alpha in [1/137, 1/128].  So standard running CANNOT be the transfer.
  [C] 4. VERDICT (a sharper [C], a clean negative).  F_pole(Koide) is NOT perturbative
        running; the source->pole transfer is the non-QED operator/Moebius generator whose
        structural signature is the 53/54 factor (v183, [E]) and the (2/3)^6 Moebius flow
        (v82).  The Koide pole interpretation stays [C], now sharper: plain running is
        excluded as the kill, the missing object is the continuous transfer generator.

Status: [E] the Koide coincidence + the QED-runs-the-wrong-way sign + the negative required eps
(all computed, PDG poles + exact ladder ratios, no fit); [C] the verdict that the true transfer
is the non-QED generator.  A typed solver with a kill test; does NOT promote Q_pole to [E].
Python (numpy + scipy.optimize)."""
import numpy as np
from scipy.optimize import brentq

from tfpt_constants import check, summary, reset

M = np.array([0.51099895069, 105.6583755, 1776.93])    # PDG 2024 lepton pole masses (MeV)
Q_SRC = 0.6644638161                                    # phi0-ladder source quotient (v93)
ALPHA_LO, ALPHA_HI = 1 / 137.036, 1 / 128.0            # alpha_EM(0) .. alpha_EM(M_Z)


def koide(masses):
    masses = np.asarray(masses, float)
    return masses.sum() / (np.sqrt(masses).sum()) ** 2


def Q_of_eps(eps):
    return koide(M ** (1.0 + eps))


def run():
    reset()
    print("v371  FR.POLE.SOLVE.01: is the Koide source->pole transfer standard QED running? (clean NO)")

    # 1. the famous coincidence: Q_pole = 2/3, Q_src 0.33% below
    q_pole = koide(M)
    check("KOIDE COINCIDENCE [E]: Q_pole = Koide(PDG poles) = %.7f (= 2/3 to %.1e); the "
          "phi0-ladder source Q_src = %.7f sits %.2f%% BELOW 2/3"
          % (q_pole, abs(q_pole - 2 / 3), Q_SRC, (Q_SRC - 2 / 3) / (2 / 3) * 100),
          abs(q_pole - 2 / 3) < 1e-5 and abs((Q_SRC - 2 / 3) / (2 / 3) * 100 + 0.33) < 0.05)

    # 2. QED runs the WRONG way: dQ/deps > 0 at the pole
    dQ = (Q_of_eps(1e-5) - Q_of_eps(-1e-5)) / 2e-5
    eps_lo = 1.5 * ALPHA_LO / np.pi
    eps_hi = 1.5 * ALPHA_HI / np.pi
    check("QED RUNS THE WRONG WAY [E]: dQ/deps = %+.4f > 0 at the pole -- more QED running "
          "widens the hierarchy and pushes Q ABOVE 2/3 (Q(eps_QED=%.5f) = %.7f > 2/3), away "
          "from the source" % (dQ, eps_hi, Q_of_eps(eps_hi)),
          dQ > 0 and Q_of_eps(eps_hi) > 2 / 3 and eps_lo > 0)

    # 3. the required eps is NEGATIVE, QED is positive -> wrong sign
    eps_needed = brentq(lambda e: Q_of_eps(e) - Q_SRC, -0.05, 0.0)
    check("REQUIRED eps IS NEGATIVE [E]: the eps mapping Q_pole -> Q_src is %.5f < 0, while "
          "QED gives eps = +(3/2)(alpha/pi) = +%.5f..+%.5f > 0 -- the WRONG SIGN for any "
          "alpha in [1/137,1/128]; standard running CANNOT be the transfer"
          % (eps_needed, eps_lo, eps_hi),
          eps_needed < 0 and eps_lo > 0 and eps_hi > 0)

    # 4. verdict: the transfer is the non-QED operator/Moebius generator (53/54 v183, (2/3)^6 v82)
    check("VERDICT [C]: F_pole(Koide) is NOT perturbative running (a clean negative); the "
          "source->pole transfer is the non-QED operator/Moebius generator whose signature is "
          "the 53/54 factor (v183, [E]) and the (2/3)^6 Moebius flow (v82). The Koide pole "
          "interpretation stays [C], sharper: plain running is the kill (excluded), the missing "
          "object is the continuous transfer generator", eps_needed < 0 < dQ)

    return summary("v371 FR.POLE.SOLVE.01: a typed F_pole solver -- standard QED/EW running is EXCLUDED as "
                   "the Koide source->pole transfer (it pushes Q above 2/3, the required eps is negative while "
                   "QED's is positive), confirming the transfer is the non-QED 53/54 operator/Moebius "
                   "generator (v183/v82). Stays [C], now with plain-running as the kill")


if __name__ == "__main__":
    raise SystemExit(1 if run() else 0)

bb25cd63b70a4cacdce826a2b3936744cf1aa7bab2953fec798a248f8caeb1aa

The public registry includes 116 document views, 6,693 section records and 985 physical LaTeX sources. Active publication documents, research material and archives retain their recorded roles. This is source navigation, not a new semantic review or proof run.