Follow the source behind the result.
Search the paper sections, open their original context and follow the checks they actually cite. The knowledge atlas explains the result; this library locates its source.
v584_ext_source_response.py
verification/v584_ext_source_response.py
This is a registered verification module. Read its original code and the paper sections that cite it, then follow the linked claim to its present classification.
Read the publication code on this page
The registered Python source is shown as text. Displaying it does not execute the code.
"""v584 -- DIAMOND.BIT.EXTSOURCE.01: the interacting follow-up of v572, executed:
rank-one Ext-source coupling on the Gibbs pencil SEPARATES THE 81-TWINS
DIRECTIONALLY INSIDE THE UNIT COUPLING BOX. The interacting kernel
K(s, J) = K_0 + s K_Pi + J v v^T (v_i = tr(theta(x_i) N), N an Ext
arrow E31/E32 of the shared radical row) has EXACT rational flip
thresholds J_c(s) = -1/(v^T K(s)^{-1} v) whose numerators are exactly
the v572 pencil factors:
compiler/E31: J_c = (15s^2-16s-16)/(16(s^2-s-1)), J_c(-1) = 15/16
compiler/E32: J_c = (15s^2-16s-16)/16
alt/E31: J_c = (s^2+16s+16)/(16(s+1)), J_c(0) = 1
alt/E32: J_c = -(s^2+16s+16)/16, J_c(0) = -1
THE SEPARATION: in the crossed phase s in (-1, s*] the compiler twin is
HEALED (inertia restored to the (4,0,3) pattern form) by positive
coupling J <= 15/16 < 1 through either Ext arrow, while the alt twin
cannot be flipped by ANY positive coupling in the open unit box (E31
threshold >= 1 with equality only at s = 0; E32 flips only at negative
J). Positive Ext coupling selects exactly the compiler twin --
consistent with v534's toy RP selection of positive seam coupling.
BONUS STRUCTURE: the compiler's E31 response has its pole at the golden
point s^2 - s - 1 = 0 (s = -1/phi = -0.618, next to s* = -0.629), and
the healing works because the v572 critical mode is Ext-visible.
FIREWALL: one algebraic platform (the v572 twin orders, trace Gibbs
pencil), one interaction class (rank-one Ext sources), declared
coupling box |J| <= 1; a RESPONSE-level selection (inertia
restoration), NOT an OS/RP positivity theorem -- no kernel is ever
PSD; the alignment-bit contract stays open; no marker moves. Verdict
enums (frozen): UNIT-BOX-SEPARATED, RESPONSE-BLIND, MIXED.
PROVENANCE: discovery probe ext_source_response_probe.py (2026-07-31,
8/8, UNIT-BOX-SEPARATED); v572 platform rebuilt verbatim.
Python-only, counted per GATE.WOLFRAM.02.
"""
import time
import numpy as np
import sympy as sp
from sympy.matrices.normalforms import hermite_normal_form
T0 = time.time()
FAILS = []
N_CHK = 0
def check(name, ok, detail=""):
global N_CHK
N_CHK += 1
if not ok:
FAILS.append(name.split()[0])
print("[%s] %s%s" % ("PASS" if ok else "FAIL", name,
(": " + detail) if detail else ""))
I3 = sp.eye(3)
IDX7 = ((0, 0), (0, 1), (1, 0), (1, 1), (2, 0), (2, 1), (2, 2))
SIG = sp.diag(1, -1, -1)
S_SYM = sp.symbols("s", real=True)
E31 = sp.Matrix(3, 3, lambda i, j: 1 if (i, j) == (2, 0) else 0)
E32 = sp.Matrix(3, 3, lambda i, j: 1 if (i, j) == (2, 1) else 0)
S_STAR = sp.Rational(8, 15) - 4 * sp.sqrt(19) / 15
def Qc(c):
return sp.Matrix([[3, 1, 0], [3, 2, 0], [3, c, 1]])
def hermite_basis(Q):
U, V = Q * sp.diag(1, 0, 0), Q * sp.diag(0, 1, 1)
ws, fr = [I3], [I3]
for _ in range(5):
fr = [w * G for w in fr for G in (U, V)]
ws += fr
Mrows = sp.Matrix([[w[i, j] for (i, j) in IDX7] for w in ws])
H = hermite_normal_form(Mrows.T)
mats = []
for k in range(H.cols):
Mx = sp.zeros(3, 3)
for r, (i, j) in enumerate(IDX7):
Mx[i, j] = H[r, k]
mats.append(Mx)
return mats
def theta(X):
return SIG * X.T * SIG
def inertia(K):
ev = np.linalg.eigvalsh(np.asarray(K, float))
return (int((ev > 1e-9).sum()), int((abs(ev) <= 1e-9).sum()),
int((ev < -1e-9).sum()))
def run():
global N_CHK, FAILS
N_CHK = 0
FAILS = []
print("=" * 78)
print("DIAMOND.BIT.EXTSOURCE -- Ext-source response on the Gibbs "
"pencil")
print("=" * 78)
basis = {c: hermite_basis(Qc(c)) for c in (2, 0)}
pencil, vecs = {}, {}
for c in (2, 0):
Vc = Qc(c) * sp.diag(0, 1, 1)
evs = sorted(Vc.eigenvals().keys(), key=lambda e: abs(e))
Pi = sp.eye(3)
for e in evs[:-1]:
Pi = Pi * (Vc - e * sp.eye(3)) / (evs[-1] - e)
K0 = sp.Matrix(7, 7, lambda i, j: sp.trace(theta(basis[c][i])
* basis[c][j]))
K1 = sp.Matrix(7, 7, lambda i, j: sp.trace(Pi * theta(basis[c][i])
* basis[c][j]))
pencil[c] = ((K0 + K0.T) / 2, (K1 + K1.T) / 2)
vecs[c] = {nm: sp.Matrix([sp.trace(theta(basis[c][k]) * N_)
for k in range(7)])
for nm, N_ in (("E31", E31), ("E32", E32))}
# ---- X1: the exact response formulas ---------------------------------
Jc_expect = {
(2, "E31"): (15 * S_SYM**2 - 16 * S_SYM - 16)
/ (16 * (S_SYM**2 - S_SYM - 1)),
(2, "E32"): (15 * S_SYM**2 - 16 * S_SYM - 16) / 16,
(0, "E31"): (S_SYM**2 + 16 * S_SYM + 16) / (16 * (S_SYM + 1)),
(0, "E32"): -(S_SYM**2 + 16 * S_SYM + 16) / 16,
}
all_ok = True
for (c, nm), expct in Jc_expect.items():
Ks = pencil[c][0] + S_SYM * pencil[c][1]
v = vecs[c][nm]
q = sp.simplify((v.T * Ks.inv() * v)[0])
if sp.simplify(-1 / q - expct) != 0:
all_ok = False
check("X1.1 [E, exact] the four rank-one flip thresholds "
"J_c(s) = -1/(v^T K(s)^{-1} v) are the CLOSED rational "
"functions above, and their numerators are EXACTLY the v572 "
"pencil factors: the compiler's extra factor (15s^2-16s-16) "
"prices its own Ext response, the shared factor "
"(s^2+16s+16) prices the alt twin's", all_ok)
ok_num = True
n_flips = 0
for c in (2, 0):
for nm in ("E31", "E32"):
v = np.asarray(vecs[c][nm], float).ravel()
K0n = np.asarray(pencil[c][0], float)
K1n = np.asarray(pencil[c][1], float)
Jc_f = sp.lambdify(S_SYM, Jc_expect[(c, nm)])
for sv in (-0.9, -0.7, -0.4, -0.1):
Jc_v = float(Jc_f(sv))
i_lo = inertia(K0n + sv * K1n
+ (Jc_v - 0.02) * np.outer(v, v))
i_hi = inertia(K0n + sv * K1n
+ (Jc_v + 0.02) * np.outer(v, v))
# exactly one eigenvalue crosses zero at J_c: the
# positive count goes up by one, the negative down
if not (i_hi[0] == i_lo[0] + 1 and i_hi[2] == i_lo[2] - 1):
ok_num = False
n_flips += 1
check("X1.2 [E, verified numerically] crossing J_c flips exactly "
"one eigenvalue from negative to positive at every sampled "
"temperature (%d flip events: s in {-0.9,-0.7,-0.4,-0.1}, "
"both twins, both arrows): the closed thresholds are the "
"actual flip curves" % n_flips, ok_num)
# ---- X2: the unit-box separation -------------------------------------
s_vals = [sp.Rational(-99, 100), sp.Rational(-9, 10),
sp.Rational(-4, 5), sp.Rational(-7, 10), S_STAR]
comp_ok = all(
0 <= float(Jc_expect[(2, "E31")].subs(S_SYM, sv)) <= 15 / 16
and 0 <= float(Jc_expect[(2, "E32")].subs(S_SYM, sv)) < 1
for sv in s_vals)
Jc_alt = sp.lambdify(S_SYM, Jc_expect[(0, "E31")])
alt_rigid = all(Jc_alt(sv) >= 1.0 - 1e-12
for sv in np.linspace(-0.999, 0.0, 400))
alt_e32_neg = all(
float(Jc_expect[(0, "E32")].subs(S_SYM, sp.Rational(n, 100))) < 0
for n in range(-99, 1))
check("X2.1 [E, THE CENTRAL RESULT -- UNIT-BOX SEPARATION] in the "
"crossed phase s in (-1, s*] the COMPILER twin is healed by "
"positive coupling J_c <= 15/16 < 1 through EITHER Ext arrow, "
"while the ALT twin cannot be flipped by any positive "
"coupling in the open unit box: its E31 threshold stays >= 1 "
"on the whole physical range and its E32 threshold is "
"negative throughout -- POSITIVE Ext-source coupling inside "
"|J| < 1 selects exactly the compiler twin",
comp_ok and alt_rigid and alt_e32_neg)
exact_anchors = (
sp.simplify(Jc_expect[(2, "E31")].subs(S_SYM, -1)
- sp.Rational(15, 16)) == 0
and sp.simplify(Jc_expect[(0, "E31")].subs(S_SYM, 0) - 1) == 0
and sp.simplify(Jc_expect[(0, "E32")].subs(S_SYM, 0) + 1) == 0
and sp.simplify(Jc_expect[(2, "E31")].subs(S_SYM, S_STAR)) == 0
and sp.simplify(Jc_expect[(2, "E32")].subs(S_SYM, S_STAR)) == 0)
check("X2.2 [E, exact anchors] the box constants are EXACT: "
"compiler J_c(-1) = 15/16; alt E31 J_c(0) = 1 (the rigidity "
"bound saturates exactly at infinite temperature); alt E32 "
"J_c(0) = -1; and both compiler thresholds vanish exactly at "
"the critical temperature s*", exact_anchors)
# ---- X3: the direction and the v534 resonance -------------------------
v31 = np.asarray(vecs[2]["E31"], float).ravel()
K0n2 = np.asarray(pencil[2][0], float)
K1n2 = np.asarray(pencil[2][1], float)
no_neg_heal = all(
inertia(K0n2 + sv * K1n2 - J * np.outer(v31, v31))[2] >= 4
for sv in (-0.9, -0.8, -0.7)
for J in (0.1, 0.5, 1.0))
check("X3.1 [E, the direction] NEGATIVE coupling never heals the "
"compiler in the crossed phase (inertia stays at 4 negative "
"directions for J in -[0.1, 1], s in {-0.9,-0.8,-0.7}): the "
"healing direction is strictly POSITIVE -- [C] consistent "
"with v534, where the interacting toy's RP cone also "
"selected the positive seam coupling on the twist state",
no_neg_heal)
# ---- X4: the golden pole ----------------------------------------------
pole_poly = sp.factor(sp.denom(sp.together(Jc_expect[(2, "E31")])))
golden_ok = (sp.simplify(sp.expand(pole_poly
- 16 * (S_SYM**2 - S_SYM - 1))) == 0)
s_pole = float((1 - sp.sqrt(5)) / 2)
check("X4.1 [E, observed structure] the compiler's E31 response has "
"its pole exactly on the GOLDEN polynomial s^2 - s - 1 (the "
"Fibonacci characteristic polynomial): s_pole = -1/phi = "
"%.4f, sitting 0.011 above the critical temperature s* = "
"%.4f -- an adjugate-level structure absent from the "
"determinant; typed as observed [C], no claim built on it"
% (s_pole, float(S_STAR)),
golden_ok and abs(s_pole - float(S_STAR)) < 0.02)
# ---- X5: the mechanism -------------------------------------------------
Ks_star = pencil[2][0] + S_STAR * pencil[2][1]
null = sp.simplify(Ks_star).nullspace()
Xc = sp.zeros(3, 3)
for k in range(7):
Xc += null[0][k] * basis[2][k]
ov31 = sp.simplify(sp.trace(theta(Xc) * E31))
ov32 = sp.simplify(sp.trace(theta(Xc) * E32))
check("X5.1 [E, the mechanism] the healing works because the v572 "
"critical mode is Ext-VISIBLE: the null matrix at s* has "
"nonzero pairing with both Ext arrows (tr(theta(X) E31) = %s, "
"tr(theta(X) E32) = %s) -- the rank-one source couples "
"directly to the crossing mode, which is why J_c(s*) = 0 "
"exactly" % (ov31, ov32),
len(null) == 1 and ov31 != 0 and ov32 != 0)
check("X6.1 [C, honest typing] this is a RESPONSE-level selection "
"(inertia restoration in a declared coupling box), not an "
"OS/RP positivity theorem: no kernel is ever PSD (3+ negative "
"directions persist), the interaction class is rank-one "
"sources only, and the alignment-bit contract "
"(CONTRACT.SEAM.BIT) stays open; no ledger marker moves",
True)
VERDICT = "UNIT-BOX-SEPARATED" if not FAILS else "MIXED"
print("\nVERDICT: %s -- positive Ext coupling inside |J| < 1 heals "
"exactly the compiler twin (J_c <= 15/16); the alt twin is "
"rigid (threshold >= 1 / negative); thresholds exact, "
"numerators = the v572 pencil factors" % VERDICT)
print("checks: %d, failures: %d %s" % (N_CHK, len(FAILS), FAILS or ""))
print("elapsed: %.1f s" % (time.time() - T0))
print("FIREWALL: response-level, declared box, one platform; no "
"positivity theorem; contract stays open; no marker moves")
print("--- DIAMOND.BIT.EXTSOURCE.01 Ext-source response: %d passed, "
"%d failed ---" % (N_CHK - len(FAILS), len(FAILS)))
return len(FAILS)
if __name__ == "__main__":
raise SystemExit(1 if run() else 0)
Recorded source fingerprint
5878dcdb86234f5d2ad3756ffd8f315d79dbea96bfae48f868cb726a9a44be3a
Paper sections that cite this module
What this source index covers
The public registry includes 116 document views, 6,693 section records and 985 physical LaTeX sources. Active publication documents, research material and archives retain their recorded roles. This is source navigation, not a new semantic review or proof run.