Follow the source behind the result.
Search the paper sections, open their original context and follow the checks they actually cite. The knowledge atlas explains the result; this library locates its source.
v91_spine_tetrahedron.py
verification/v91_spine_tetrahedron.py
This is a registered verification module. Read its original code and the paper sections that cite it, then follow the linked claim to its present classification.
Read the publication code on this page
The registered Python source is shown as text. Displaying it does not execute the code.
"""v91 -- The Spine Tetrahedron: the compiler microkernel as one finite object.
Implements the review proposal (2026-06-10): the spine T = {2,3,4,5} =
{|Z2|, N_fam, |mu_4|, g_car} is promoted from a recurring quotient set to a
single combinatorial object -- a tetrahedron whose nodes, edges, faces and
volume ARE the central integer grammar.
WHAT IS GENUINELY CHECKED (and how it is typed):
[I] 1. anchor closure: T = {e3(a), p0(a), e1(a), e2(a)} for a = (1,1,2)
-- the tetrahedron is NOT a second structure next to the anchor;
it is the anchor plus its zeroth moment.
[I] 2. edge products {6,8,10,12,15,20} with established readings
(|R+(A3)|/C6; rank E8 = h(D5) = det R; A_Lambda = |E(K5)|;
|R(A3)| = dim SM gauge; dim A3; det L).
[I] 3. face products {24,30,40,60} (|W(A3)|; h(E8); |R(D5)| = Sum L;
cascade start D_0 = dim of the mixed (10,6) block, cf. v89).
[I] 4. volume 2*3*4*5 = 120 = |R+(E8)| = Tr_S+ X^2 = sum of E8 exponents
= 5!.
[I] 5. graph reading: |R(E8)| = 240 = |mu_4| * |E(K_4)| * |E(K_5)| with
|E(K_4)| = p2(a) = 6 and |E(K_5)| = p3(a) = 10 -- and the honest
NEGATIVE CONTROL: the identification breaks at K_6
(|E(K_6)| = 15 != p4(a) = 18), so it is specific, not generic.
TRIVIALITY FLAG (important): 6. the "dual cuts" (node x opposite face,
edge x opposite edge, all = 120) are TAUTOLOGIES -- every complementary
partition of a 4-set multiplies to the total product. Their value is
purely organisational: ONE raster instead of seven separate "120
costumes". They are typed as presentation, never as evidence.
HONEST INCOMPLETENESS: 7. the tetrahedron grammar is a SUB-grammar. The
full subset-product set is {2,...,120} (15 numbers); the load-bearing
7 (scalaron), 16 (dim S+), 41 (EM budget), 48 (Omega_adm), 240, 248 are
NOT subset products -- they need the anchor power sums / Pascal /
glue layers. The tetrahedron complements, it does not replace, the
admissibility filter.
AUDIT (fingerprint, not load-bearing): 8. chi_T(t) = (t-2)(t-3)(t-4)(t-5)
= t^4 - 14 t^3 + 71 t^2 - 154 t + 120: the coefficients are exactly
(node sum, edge sum, face sum, volume) = (14, 71, 154, 120) with
14 = dim G2 (the [K,Q] motif, v80); the spine is symmetric about 7/2, so
chi_T(0) = chi_T(7) = 120 and chi_T(1) = chi_T(6) = 24, and the scalaron
exponent 7 = 2+5 = 3+4 is the complementary-pair sum (the same 7 as the
branch-divisor trace, v80/v81). Typed AUDIT: 71 and 154 carry no TFPT
reading; nothing here is promoted to spine status.
"""
from itertools import combinations
from math import prod, comb, factorial
import sympy as sp
from tfpt_constants import check, summary, reset, g_car, N_fam
ANCHOR = (1, 1, 2)
Z2, MU4 = 2, 4
SPINE = (Z2, N_fam, MU4, g_car) # {2,3,4,5}
E8_EXPONENTS = (1, 7, 11, 13, 17, 19, 23, 29)
SCALARON = 7
DIM_G2 = 14
def esym(a, k):
return sum(prod(c) for c in combinations(a, k)) if k else 1
def run():
reset()
print("v91 spine tetrahedron (compiler microkernel; review proposal 2026-06-10)")
# 1. the anchor generates the spine (plus zeroth moment)
gen = sorted([esym(ANCHOR, 3), len(ANCHOR), esym(ANCHOR, 1), esym(ANCHOR, 2)])
check("spine = {e3(a), p0(a), e1(a), e2(a)} = {2,3,4,5} = "
"{|Z2|, N_fam, |mu4|, g_car}", gen == sorted(SPINE))
# 2. edges
edges = sorted(prod(c) for c in combinations(SPINE, 2))
check("edge products = {6,8,10,12,15,20}",
edges == [6, 8, 10, 12, 15, 20])
check("edge readings: 2*3=6=|R+(A3)|=C6; 2*4=8=rank E8=h(D5)=det R; "
"2*5=10=A_Lambda=|E(K5)|; 3*4=12=|R(A3)|=dim SM gauge (8+3+1); "
"3*5=15=dim A3; 4*5=20=det L",
2 * 3 == 6 and 2 * 4 == 8 and 2 * 5 == 10
and 3 * 4 == 8 + 3 + 1 and 3 * 5 == 15 and 4 * 5 == 20)
# 3. faces
faces = sorted(prod(c) for c in combinations(SPINE, 3))
check("face products = {24,30,40,60}", faces == [24, 30, 40, 60])
check("face readings: 2*3*4=24=|W(A3)|=4!; 2*3*5=30=h(E8); "
"2*4*5=40=|R(D5)|=Sum L; 3*4*5=60=cascade start = dim(10,6) "
"mixed block (v89 branching)",
24 == factorial(4) and 30 == 2 * 3 * 5 and 40 == 2 * 4 * 5
and 60 == 10 * 6)
# 4. volume
check("volume 2*3*4*5 = 120 = |R+(E8)| = 5! = sum of E8 exponents "
"(= Tr_S+ X^2, tfpt_1)",
prod(SPINE) == 120 == factorial(5) == sum(E8_EXPONENTS))
# 5. graph reading + negative control
check("graph reading: |R(E8)| = 240 = |mu4| * |E(K4)| * |E(K5)| "
"with |E(K4)| = p2(a) = 6, |E(K5)| = p3(a) = 10",
MU4 * comb(4, 2) * comb(5, 2) == 240
and comb(4, 2) == sum(x**2 for x in ANCHOR)
and comb(5, 2) == sum(x**3 for x in ANCHOR))
check("NEGATIVE CONTROL: the graph reading breaks at K6 "
"(|E(K6)| = 15 != p4(a) = 18) -- specific, not generic",
comb(6, 2) == 15 and sum(x**4 for x in ANCHOR) == 18)
# 6. dual cuts -- correct, but TAUTOLOGICAL (typed as presentation)
node_cuts = [n * prod(x for x in SPINE if x != n) for n in SPINE]
edge_cuts = [prod(c) * prod(x for x in SPINE if x not in c)
for c in combinations(SPINE, 2)]
check("dual cuts all equal 120 (2*60, 3*40, 4*30, 5*24; 6*20, 8*15, "
"10*12) -- TAUTOLOGY of complementary partitions; value is the "
"one-raster presentation, NOT evidence",
set(node_cuts) == {120} and set(edge_cuts) == {120})
# 7. honest incompleteness of the grammar
products = {prod(c) for r in (1, 2, 3, 4)
for c in combinations(SPINE, r)}
outside = [7, 16, 41, 48, 240, 248]
check("SUB-grammar, honestly: 7 (scalaron), 16 (dim S+), 41 (EM "
"budget), 48 (Omega_adm), 240, 248 are NOT subset products -- "
"the tetrahedron complements the admissibility filter, it does "
"not replace it",
all(n not in products for n in outside))
# 8. chi_T audit fingerprint (NOT load-bearing)
t = sp.symbols('t')
chi = sp.expand(sp.prod([t - x for x in SPINE]))
check("chi_T = t^4 - 14 t^3 + 71 t^2 - 154 t + 120; coefficients = "
"(node sum, edge sum, face sum, volume), node sum 14 = dim G2 "
"([K,Q] motif, v80) [AUDIT]",
chi == t**4 - 14 * t**3 + 71 * t**2 - 154 * t + 120
and sum(SPINE) == DIM_G2 and sum(edges) == 71
and sum(faces) == 154)
check("spine symmetric about 7/2: chi_T(0)=chi_T(7)=120, "
"chi_T(1)=chi_T(6)=24; scalaron 7 = 2+5 = 3+4 = the "
"complementary-pair sum (same 7 as the branch-divisor trace, "
"v80/v81) [AUDIT, not load-bearing]",
chi.subs(t, 0) == chi.subs(t, SCALARON) == 120
and chi.subs(t, 1) == chi.subs(t, 6) == 24
and 2 + 5 == 3 + 4 == SCALARON)
return summary("v91 spine tetrahedron")
if __name__ == "__main__":
raise SystemExit(1 if run() else 0)
Recorded source fingerprint
e430ceb3986f6fd6fcbe0e174325ee395fb4dddce7e163527477752465641ec4
Paper sections that cite this module
What this source index covers
The public registry includes 116 document views, 6,693 section records and 985 physical LaTeX sources. Active publication documents, research material and archives retain their recorded roles. This is source navigation, not a new semantic review or proof run.