Follow the source behind the result.
Search the paper sections, open their original context and follow the checks they actually cite. The knowledge atlas explains the result; this library locates its source.
v94_sheet_diamond.py
verification/v94_sheet_diamond.py
This is a registered verification module. Read its original code and the paper sections that cite it, then follow the linked claim to its present classification.
Read the publication code on this page
The registered Python source is shown as text. Displaying it does not execute the code.
"""v94 -- Sheet Diamond & Winding Line (review round 2026-06-11): the flavor
operators live on ONE two-parameter surface; the winding channel and the
quark-ratio Pluecker readings are canonicalised. [I] + honest corrections.
Validated from the second review round. What is genuinely NEW (the review's
points 5, 7-9, 14-18 already exist as v74/v81/v88/v89/v92/v75 and are not
duplicated here):
[I] 1. SHEET DIAMOND. M(s,t) = R + Q diag(s,t,t) carries all four flavor
operators as distinguished points:
R = M(0,0), K = M(1,-1), L = M(2,0), F = M(1,1),
with the two global invariants
det M(s,t) = 3st^2 + 9st + 6s + t^2 + 5t + 8,
det B_M(s,t) = 6st + 12s + 3t^2 + 15t + 16.
The mass-transport pencil K + xQ is the CUT (s,t) = (1+x, x-1), on
which det B factorises as (3x+2)(3x+5) -- the v81 master cover.
[I] 2. BUILT-IN NEGATIVE CONTROLS. The factorisation is special to that
cut: the diagonal cut t = s gives 9s^2+27s+16 with disc = 153 --
the SAME non-square discriminant as the R-direction control of
v85 (anchor-first coherence) -- and the R->L cut t = 0 is linear
(degenerate direction).
[I] 3. WINDING LINE SYNCHRONISATION. On R_s = R + s*1 e_1^T:
det R_s = 8 + 2s, det B_{R_s} = 16 + 4s = 2 det R_s
for ALL s -- anchor area and torsion volume run synchronously on
the whole winding channel, not just at the endpoints. Each of the
three closure conditions alone fixes the physical value:
tr R_s = 15 = dim A3 => s = 6,
det R_s = 20 = det L => s = 6,
(R_s^T a)_1 = 30 = h(E8) => s = 6.
[I] 4. COFACTOR SEAM NORMAL (typed as repackaging: the cross product of
columns 2,3 IS the first adjugate row by construction; the content
is the integer readings). n = r_2 x r_3 = (5,-9,6) is the common
first adjugate row of R and L (columns 2,3 are winding-invariant),
n.1 = 2 = |Z2| (the per-winding determinant increment,
hence det R_s = 8 + 2s),
n^T R = (8,0,0), n^T L = (20,0,0), n.a = 8, n.(a+6*1) = 20:
the normal annihilates the stable columns and selects the first
generation as the only open torsion channel.
[I/N] 5. REALITY -- the review's "Reality Selector" CORRECTED. The
spectrum of R_s becomes real at s* ~ 2.825 (disc sign change
between s=2 and s=3), NOT at s=6: reality does not select the
winding value (the triple lock does). Honest statement: the
winding line CROSSES the reality threshold, and at the physical
s = 6 the spectrum is real positive with
disc chi_L = 39200 = 2^5 5^2 7^2 = 2 (10*14)^2.
[I] 6. F-CORNER AUDIT (extends v80's det B_F = 52): det F = 32 = 2^5,
chi_F = (lam-2)(lam^2-13lam+16), B_F = [[37,43],[53,63]] with
sum = 196 = 14^2 = (dim G2)^2, tr = 100, 43+53 = 96 = 2 Omega_adm.
Audit fingerprints, not load-bearing.
[I] 7. RIGHT-PLUECKER CANONICALISATION (load-bearing improvement): with
Pi_R(M) = minors of (M1 | Ma),
Pi_R(Q) = (0,4,5), Pi_R(K) = (12,12,-2),
Pi_R(R) = (8,12,4), Pi_R(L) = (20,30,10) = 10*(2,3,1),
the canonical quark-ratio readings become
c_u/c_d = g_car ||Pi_L(K)||_1 / (N_fam^2 Delta_Q) (11, left)
c_t/c_b = N_fam / ||Pi_R(K)||_1 (26, right)
-- BOTH ratio integers now live in the SAME operator K (left block
= flavor orientation, right block = transport propagation); the
older readings Pl(L)_13 = 26 and 2*Delta_Q = 26 become corollaries.
Sum Pi_R(L) = 60 = cascade start closes the loop to v91.
[I] 8. FIREWALL REJECTION (honest): the review's rule "all small rational
factors must be adjacent spine quotients" is FALSE as stated --
the load-bearing 16/7, 7/6 (lepton c's), 5/6 (gamma_car), 8/7
(m_mu/m_tau prefactor) are not adjacent quotients of (2,3,4,5).
The adjacent-quotient ladder stays what v74 typed it as: an exact
observation on the recurring glue/misalignment factors, NOT a
hard admissibility filter.
"""
import sympy as sp
from tfpt_constants import check, summary, reset
s, t, x, lam = sp.symbols('s t x lambda')
R = sp.Matrix([[1, 3, 0], [1, 5, 2], [2, 5, 3]])
Q = sp.Matrix([[3, 1, 0], [3, 2, 0], [3, 2, 1]])
SIG = sp.diag(1, -1, -1)
K = R + Q * SIG
L = R + Q * (sp.eye(3) + SIG)
F = R + Q
ONE = sp.Matrix([1, 1, 1])
A = sp.Matrix([1, 1, 2])
def anchor_block(M):
return sp.Matrix([[(ONE.T * M * ONE)[0], (ONE.T * M * A)[0]],
[(A.T * M * ONE)[0], (A.T * M * A)[0]]])
def pi_left(M):
blk = sp.Matrix.vstack((ONE.T * M), (A.T * M))
return [blk[:, [i, j]].det() for i, j in ((0, 1), (0, 2), (1, 2))]
def pi_right(M):
blk = sp.Matrix.hstack(M * ONE, M * A)
return [blk[[i, j], :].det() for i, j in ((0, 1), (0, 2), (1, 2))]
def run():
reset()
print("v94 sheet diamond & winding line (review 2026-06-11, validated subset)")
# 1. the diamond and its two global invariants
M = R + Q * sp.diag(s, t, t)
check("diamond corners: R=M(0,0), K=M(1,-1), L=M(2,0), F=M(1,1)",
M.subs({s: 0, t: 0}) == R and M.subs({s: 1, t: -1}) == K
and M.subs({s: 2, t: 0}) == L and M.subs({s: 1, t: 1}) == F)
check("det M(s,t) = 3st^2+9st+6s+t^2+5t+8 (exact)",
sp.expand(M.det() - (3*s*t**2 + 9*s*t + 6*s + t**2 + 5*t + 8)) == 0)
dB = sp.expand(anchor_block(M).det())
check("det B_M(s,t) = 6st+12s+3t^2+15t+16 (exact)",
sp.expand(dB - (6*s*t + 12*s + 3*t**2 + 15*t + 16)) == 0)
check("mass-transport pencil = the cut (s,t)=(1+x,x-1): det B -> "
"(3x+2)(3x+5) (the v81 master cover)",
sp.factor(sp.expand(dB.subs({s: 1 + x, t: x - 1})))
== (3*x + 2)*(3*x + 5))
# 2. built-in negative controls
diag_cut = sp.expand(dB.subs(t, s))
check("NEGATIVE CONTROL: diagonal cut t=s gives 9s^2+27s+16, disc = 153 "
"non-square -- the SAME control discriminant as v85's R-direction",
diag_cut == 9*s**2 + 27*s + 16
and sp.discriminant(diag_cut, s) == 153
and not sp.sqrt(153).is_rational)
check("NEGATIVE CONTROL: R->L cut t=0 is linear 12s+16 (degenerate "
"direction, no cover)", sp.expand(dB.subs(t, 0)) == 12*s + 16)
# 3. winding line synchronisation + triple lock
Rs = R + s * ONE * sp.Matrix([[1, 0, 0]])
check("winding line: det R_s = 8+2s AND det B_{R_s} = 16+4s = 2 det R_s "
"for ALL s (anchor area / torsion volume synchronised)",
sp.expand(Rs.det() - (8 + 2*s)) == 0
and sp.expand(anchor_block(Rs).det() - 2*Rs.det()) == 0)
check("triple lock: tr=15=dim A3, det=20=det L, (R_s^T a)_1=30=h(E8) "
"EACH alone give s=6=|R+(A3)|",
sp.solve(Rs.trace() - 15, s) == [6]
and sp.solve(Rs.det() - 20, s) == [6]
and sp.solve((Rs.T * A)[0] - 30, s) == [6])
# 4. cofactor seam normal
n = R[:, 1].cross(R[:, 2])
check("cofactor seam normal n = (5,-9,6) = first adjugate row of R AND "
"of L (columns 2,3 winding-invariant)",
list(n) == [5, -9, 6] and R.adjugate()[0, :].T == n
and L.adjugate()[0, :].T == n)
check("n.1 = 2 = |Z2| (the per-winding determinant increment); "
"n^T R = (8,0,0), n^T L = (20,0,0): only generation 1 is an open "
"torsion channel",
(n.T * ONE)[0] == 2 and list(n.T * R) == [8, 0, 0]
and list(n.T * L) == [20, 0, 0])
# 5. reality, corrected
chi = sp.expand((lam * sp.eye(3) - Rs).det())
disc = sp.discriminant(chi, lam)
check("disc(s) = 17s^4-18s^3+709s^2+588s-7996; sign change between s=2 "
"and s=3 => reality threshold s* ~ 2.825, NOT 6: reality does NOT "
"select the winding value (honest correction of the review)",
sp.expand(disc - (17*s**4 - 18*s**3 + 709*s**2 + 588*s - 7996)) == 0
and disc.subs(s, 2) < 0 and disc.subs(s, 3) > 0)
check("at the physical s=6: disc chi_L = 39200 = 2^5 5^2 7^2 = "
"2(10*14)^2, spectrum real (R at s=0 is complex: disc = -7996 < 0)",
disc.subs(s, 6) == 39200 and 39200 == 2 * (10 * 14)**2
and disc.subs(s, 0) == -7996)
# 6. F-corner audit
BF = anchor_block(F)
check("F-corner audit: det F = 32 = 2^5; chi_F = (lam-2)(lam^2-13lam+16); "
"B_F = [[37,43],[53,63]], det 52 = dim F4 (v80), sum 196 = 14^2 = "
"(dim G2)^2, tr 100, 43+53 = 96 = 2 Omega_adm [AUDIT]",
F.det() == 32
and sp.factor(sp.expand((lam * sp.eye(3) - F).det()))
== (lam - 2) * (lam**2 - 13*lam + 16)
and BF == sp.Matrix([[37, 43], [53, 63]]) and BF.det() == 52
and sum(BF) == 196 and BF.trace() == 100
and BF[0, 1] + BF[1, 0] == 96)
# 7. right-Pluecker canonicalisation
check("right-Pluecker block: Pi_R(Q)=(0,4,5), Pi_R(K)=(12,12,-2), "
"Pi_R(R)=(8,12,4), Pi_R(L)=(20,30,10)=10(2,3,1), sum 60 = cascade "
"start",
pi_right(Q) == [0, 4, 5] and pi_right(K) == [12, 12, -2]
and pi_right(R) == [8, 12, 4] and pi_right(L) == [20, 30, 10]
and sum(pi_right(L)) == 60)
nL = sum(abs(v) for v in pi_left(K))
nR = sum(abs(v) for v in pi_right(K))
check("CANONICAL ratio readings: ||Pi_L(K)||_1 = 11 and ||Pi_R(K)||_1 = "
"26 -- BOTH quark-ratio integers live in the SAME operator K "
"(left = orientation, right = propagation)",
nL == 11 and nR == 26)
check("c_u/c_d = g_car*11/(N_fam^2 Delta_Q) = 55/117 and c_t/c_b = "
"N_fam/||Pi_R(K)||_1 = 3/26; Pl(L)_13 = 26 and 2*Delta_Q = 26 "
"become corollaries",
sp.Rational(5 * nL, 9 * 13) == sp.Rational(55, 117)
and sp.Rational(3, nR) == sp.Rational(3, 26)
and pi_left(L)[1] == 26 and 2 * 13 == 26)
# 8. firewall rejection (honest)
spine = [2, 3, 4, 5]
adj = {sp.Rational(spine[i], spine[i+1]) for i in range(3)} \
| {sp.Rational(spine[i+1], spine[i]) for i in range(3)}
offenders = [sp.Rational(16, 7), sp.Rational(7, 6), sp.Rational(5, 6),
sp.Rational(8, 7)]
check("FIREWALL REJECTED as a hard rule: load-bearing 16/7, 7/6 (lepton "
"c's), 5/6 (gamma_car), 8/7 are NOT adjacent spine quotients -- "
"the v74 quotient ladder stays an observation, not a filter",
all(r not in adj for r in offenders))
return summary("v94 sheet diamond")
if __name__ == "__main__":
raise SystemExit(1 if run() else 0)
Recorded source fingerprint
738b62eedd1b9687cdc5a084f95f9356c06a745b0965bf88b20b84aa17bca512
Paper sections that cite this module
What this source index covers
The public registry includes 116 document views, 6,693 section records and 985 physical LaTeX sources. Active publication documents, research material and archives retain their recorded roles. This is source navigation, not a new semantic review or proof run.