Skip to main content

Explore the foundations and current research.

Follow the published construction into its registered claims, then explore reviewed research questions, attempts and the connections that remain open.

Reviewed results

519 matching reviewed results

Established in scope

Full G0 lift cocycle trivialized by explicit cochain

In the question: Active mathematical program: marked seam monodromies and lattice lifts

Full cocycle and global trivialization on G0 only; no splitting decision for full G31 or W(E8).

Read the exact result, assumptions and evidence

Result

For actual G0=<J,R>=C4×C2 the full8×8factor table of the original ordered lattice lift is computed. Its Hom(L,F2) class vanishes: b=(0,86,6,80,136,223,142,217), ordered1,R,J,JR,J²,J²R,J³,J³R, satisfies b(g)+g.b(h)+c(g,h)=b(gh) on64pairs. All512cocycle triples checked.

Required assumptions

  • Existing even E8 lattice, Gaussian J and sign lifts

    Given existing even unimodular E8 with actual J(x0,x1,...)=(-x1,x0,...) and J²=-I, and the original ordered sign lattice cocycle. Sign automorphisms have kernel Hom(L,F2). Retain original integral ordered basis and generator phases; no enlargement to U1 characters except explicitly defined scalar pushouts.

  • Actual clock/complex-reflection subgroup and native quartic space

    R=diag(-1,1,1,1) on Gaussian C4 is the complex reflection of root line(1+i)e0; G0=<J,R>=C4×C2. P5 is the existing five-dimensional symmetric quartic subspace in Sym4(V4), W6=exterior²V4. R is not a real codim1 E8 Weyl reflection; P5 is not the full fourth tensor power.

Original evidence

  • THEORY.txt lines 252–284

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    experiments/theory-contracts/marked-seam-monodromy-20261023/THEORY.txt

    83f6f464aff89acb5cc4194244a5636d4a4ff62600cdf5ee3c33ded4410f963a

finding:native-clock-reflection-full-factor-cocycle-trivialization

Established in scope

Nontrivial central quotient class and all subgroup restrictions

In the question: Active mathematical program: marked seam monodromies and lattice lifts

Central quotient extension with trivial coefficient action, distinct from split noncentral extension over<J> and the G0 factor.16classes describe the Z-induced family, not all H2(F2^5,U1).

Read the exact result, assumptions and evidence

Result

Z(Gamma)=F2^5 and Gamma/Z=F2^5, with full central cocycle kappa((u,e),(a,f))=(ea,ef). Restriction vanishes exactly on subgroups in e=0; otherwise a nontrivial square obstructs an order2 lift.32central characters yield16marked U1 classes,15nonzero: pure clock carry is a U1 coboundary, other classes are distinguished by commutators.

Required assumptions

  • Existing even E8 lattice, Gaussian J and sign lifts

    Given existing even unimodular E8 with actual J(x0,x1,...)=(-x1,x0,...) and J²=-I, and the original ordered sign lattice cocycle. Sign automorphisms have kernel Hom(L,F2). Retain original integral ordered basis and generator phases; no enlargement to U1 characters except explicitly defined scalar pushouts.

Original evidence

  • THEORY.txt lines 117–168

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    experiments/theory-contracts/marked-seam-monodromy-20261023/THEORY.txt

    83f6f464aff89acb5cc4194244a5636d4a4ff62600cdf5ee3c33ded4410f963a

finding:quarter-lift-central-quotient-class-and-all-subgroup-restrictions

Established in scope

Complete quarter-clock sign-lift classification with526336classes

In the question: Active mathematical program: marked seam monodromies and lattice lifts

Complete only for declared ordered quarter-clock/sign-lift stratum under Gamma conjugation; not full G31/W(E8) reflection moduli or additional equivariant structures.

Read the exact result, assumptions and evidence

Result

Gamma=F2^8 semidirect C4 has order1024. Peripheral classes C_u over J are indexed by F2^4. Four ordered classes admit product1 iff sum ui=0. Normal forms(x,y) modulo translation(u1+u0,u2+u0) give256classes for diagonal profiles,128otherwise. Total526336;4096orbits size16 with stabilizer C4×C2^4 and522240size32 with stabilizer C2^5. Image-order census4:16,8:720,16:14880,32:80640,64:430080; no surjection.

Required assumptions

  • Existing even E8 lattice, Gaussian J and sign lifts

    Given existing even unimodular E8 with actual J(x0,x1,...)=(-x1,x0,...) and J²=-I, and the original ordered sign lattice cocycle. Sign automorphisms have kernel Hom(L,F2). Retain original integral ordered basis and generator phases; no enlargement to U1 characters except explicitly defined scalar pushouts.

  • Four ordered punctures with fixed quarter-clock projection

    X is CP1 minus ordered(1,i,-1,-i), positive meridians product1, fixed rho(gamma_i)=J. Classify all sign lifts into full preimage Gamma of<J>, modulo simultaneous Gamma conjugation with optional prescribed peripheral conjugacy classes. No mapping-class, puncture permutation or additional spatial reflection-equivariance quotient.

Original evidence

  • THEORY.txt lines 169–251

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    experiments/theory-contracts/marked-seam-monodromy-20261023/THEORY.txt

    83f6f464aff89acb5cc4194244a5636d4a4ff62600cdf5ee3c33ded4410f963a

finding:quarter-clock-sign-lift-complete-four-puncture-classification

Established in scope

Marked-seam category and full character-valued lift factor formula

In the question: Active mathematical program: marked seam monodromies and lattice lifts

Declared definitions and derived standard extension/gluing algebra, not a classification of all object groups.

Read the exact result, assumptions and evidence

Result

Marked lattice transport functors with explicit reflection/clock markings define a category, products and boundary gluing under inverse-conjugate holonomies. Ordered generator phase eta gives the full factor c(g,h)(y)=eta_h(x)eta_g(hx)/eta_gh(x), x=(gh)^-1y. It is Hom(L,F2)-valued with coefficient action, not generally scalar or central.

Required assumptions

  • Active purely mathematical marked-seam program

    Within the stated mathematical scope, marked pairs, lattice transport systems, reflections, clocks and cohomology are independent mathematical objects. Earlier origin/completion tasks are historical, not active. Distinguish new definitions, derived theorems and optional markings.

  • Existing even E8 lattice, Gaussian J and sign lifts

    Given existing even unimodular E8 with actual J(x0,x1,...)=(-x1,x0,...) and J²=-I, and the original ordered sign lattice cocycle. Sign automorphisms have kernel Hom(L,F2). Retain original integral ordered basis and generator phases; no enlargement to U1 characters except explicitly defined scalar pushouts.

Original evidence

  • THEORY.txt lines 15–116

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    experiments/theory-contracts/marked-seam-monodromy-20261023/THEORY.txt

    83f6f464aff89acb5cc4194244a5636d4a4ff62600cdf5ee3c33ded4410f963a

  • source_manifest.json lines 1–20

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    experiments/theory-contracts/marked-seam-monodromy-20261023/source_manifest.json

    b93771ee5416083bbd53c4458b6b651f646b4ff2ac42681b895dfec18a768f8c

finding:marked-seam-category-and-character-valued-full-lift-factor

Established in scope

Glue elements, two orbits, spinor swap and halfway stage are explicitly formalized

In the question: Formal carrier core: unbounded Pascal uniqueness and finite glue

The concrete element/orbit and arithmetic statements are available. No fresh kernel run, nor a newly checked single Lean theorem about all abstract subgroups or lattice isomorphisms. The general subgroup conclusion also uses finite group theory; concrete E8 basis embedding and physical carrier selection are separate.

Read the exact result, assumptions and evidence

Result

In Fin4 x Fin4 with qZ=(5x^2+3y^2) mod8, named Lean declarations classify all six isotropic elements and four odd-coordinate isotropic generators. Explicit orbit identities give H1 and H2; klein_not_isotropic gives the nonisotropic Klein witness, spinor_swap_exchanges swaps the two orbits, and unique_halfway_stage classifies the only nonzero isotropic order-two element (2,2). Index and sector arithmetic are additional separate declarations.

Required assumptions

  • Specified finite carrier discriminant form

    The model is El=Fin4 x Fin4 with componentwise addition modulo4 and qZ(x,y)=(5x^2+3y^2) mod8. Its identification with a concrete physical carrier is not inferred without premises.

Original evidence

  • GlueUniqueness.lean lines 34–132

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    experiments/lean4-carrier-rigidity/TfptCarrier/GlueUniqueness.lean

    51e98673e96f4344fec729c2874a947dcc1f31f5787983af3267e113fd329df2

  • 005-source.tex lines 166–182

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    documents/tfpt_1_architecture_e8/sections/005-source.tex

    2de406bb3e912bb795eca44e8552d11040413587aba14b3924e07b145b91bdcd

finding:finite-carrier-glue-elements-orbits-and-halfway

Established in scope

Pascal condition has exactly the solution five for all natural g

In the question: Formal carrier core: unbounded Pascal uniqueness and finite glue

Algebraic uniqueness under the stipulated Pascal/half-spinor exhaustion condition. Original source and proof text reviewed; no fresh Lean kernel run. AX.P2.01 remains a declared physical interface; the equation does not select itself from an original source.

Read the exact result, assumptions and evidence

Result

CarrierRankUniqueness.carrier_rank_pascal_unique states and proves for every natural g that 2^g=g^2+g+2 iff g=5. Its proof combines the small cases with pascal_growth for all g>=6. This is unbounded; PascalLadder has a separate bounded K=2 statement. For g=5, N_fam=3 and g+N_fam=8 are computed.

Required assumptions

  • Pascal exhaustion condition as input

    g is natural; the stipulated equation is 2^g=g^2+g+2. The equation itself is the additional carrier exhaustion rule.

Original evidence

finding:pascal-carrier-rank-unique-unbounded-source-proof

Established in scope

Finite sequential data admit a classical history realization

In the question: Observable reality: minimal conditions and counterworlds

Conditional representation theorem without novelty claim, not efficient or local physical simulation. History/preparation dependence and growing memory are allowed; Bell, noncontextuality or resource witnesses under independently justified extra conditions are not invalidated. Protocol direction is assumed, not physical causality derived.

Read the exact result, assumptions and evidence

Result

Every finite normalized prefix-consistent response family with past marginals independent of future choices has a finite classical stochastic realization: preparation/full history as memory, conditional ratios as transitions, append the next choice/report pair. The construction also reproduces adaptive protocols. It was checked exactly on all requested D tables through horizon4. Finite sequential disturbance and order dependence alone do not exclude unrestricted classical history models.

Required assumptions

  • Finite prefix-consistent sequential response tables

    Supply finite preparation/action/report sets, finite horizon and nonnegative normalized sequential probability tables. Summing out the last report recovers prefixes and earlier marginals do not depend on future choices. Impose no memory, locality, stationarity or preparation-noncontextuality bounds on the representation.

Original evidence

  • OBSERVABILITY.txt lines 236–315

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    experiments/theory-contracts/foundational-process-classification-20261016/OBSERVABILITY.txt

    5253c7df5f3347129e2eb5d8e6bb161d09d9fa19ae64a456ca967eebc7439468

  • observability_models.py lines 218–270

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    experiments/theory-contracts/foundational-process-classification-20261016/observability_models.py

    bc57e8c166f9b4ccd43d7cebd60202f0b7ef0e847e469c86503eb0e24ee7c5ee

finding:finite-sequential-data-admit-classical-history-realization

Established in scope

Report repeatability is not complete state stability

In the question: Observable reality: minimal conditions and counterworlds

Standard residual representation consequence and explicit counterexamples, not a new ontology. Distinguishability, repeatability, context reproduction and serial availability are separate assumptions. Separate L1/L2 from L3.

Read the exact result, assumptions and evidence

Result

The separate benchmark assumptions give at least two continuation-distinguishable classes and preserve the selected report label under uninterrupted repetition. This largely restates the substantive repeatability premise rather than explaining physical origin. A test can preserve its report while incrementing a separately readable modulo3 counter; result repetition therefore forces no complete idempotence, preservation of all correlations, metric time or eternal material memory. Possible reports alone select no numerical weights.

Required assumptions

  • Explicit repeatable-distinction benchmark

    Recognizable reports, reproducibility of a declared context and available serial continuations are separate commitments. The sharp benchmark additionally has an immediately result-repeatable test and two preparations with different certain reports. These conditions are stronger than mere observability; probability, free erasure, re-preparation, replica control or physical time are not assumed to follow.

Original evidence

  • OBSERVABILITY.txt lines 1–92

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    experiments/theory-contracts/foundational-process-classification-20261016/OBSERVABILITY.txt

    5253c7df5f3347129e2eb5d8e6bb161d09d9fa19ae64a456ca967eebc7439468

  • OBSERVABILITY.txt lines 213–235

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    experiments/theory-contracts/foundational-process-classification-20261016/OBSERVABILITY.txt

    5253c7df5f3347129e2eb5d8e6bb161d09d9fa19ae64a456ca967eebc7439468

finding:repeatable-reports-do-not-imply-full-state-stability

Established in scope

Repeatable distinctions select no unique response geometry

In the question: Observable reality: minimal conditions and counterworlds

Three countermodels, not an exhaustive classification of operational worlds. I/D assume probabilities/convexity; their numbers are predictions, not new measurements or physical dimensions. All-context equality follows analytically from linearity, not the finite word check.

Read the exact result, assumptions and evidence

Result

Three explicit single-system theories satisfy the same sharp repeatability benchmark and are operationally inequivalent: R has two classes without mixing, I a classical simplex, D a square with nonunique decompositions. XZX preserves the first X report with probability1 in I and1/2 in D; D identifies both diagonal mixtures under all generated protocols while I distinguishes them by parity. All30 X/Z words through length4 were checked exactly. D has a classical hidden two-bit implementation of its generators; not all classical models are excluded.

Required assumptions

  • Explicit repeatable-distinction benchmark

    Recognizable reports, reproducibility of a declared context and available serial continuations are separate commitments. The sharp benchmark additionally has an immediately result-repeatable test and two preparations with different certain reports. These conditions are stronger than mere observability; probability, free erasure, re-preparation, replica control or physical time are not assumed to follow.

  • Three explicit operational countermodels

    R has deterministic preparation/read traces and continued partial-identity branches only, no primitive mixing or internal re-preparation. I is the classical two-bit simplex with probabilities and nondisturbing joint access. D is the square with explicit positive X/Z branches, square symmetries, preparations, mixtures and finite serial/adaptive closure. These selected rules define counterworlds rather than necessary physics.

Original evidence

  • OBSERVABILITY.txt lines 93–212

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    experiments/theory-contracts/foundational-process-classification-20261016/OBSERVABILITY.txt

    5253c7df5f3347129e2eb5d8e6bb161d09d9fa19ae64a456ca967eebc7439468

  • observability_models.py lines 280–401

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    experiments/theory-contracts/foundational-process-classification-20261016/observability_models.py

    bc57e8c166f9b4ccd43d7cebd60202f0b7ef0e847e469c86503eb0e24ee7c5ee

finding:three-inequivalent-repeatable-observation-countermodels

Established in scope

Workflow reset without global TFPT impossibility claim

In the question: Observable reality: minimal conditions and counterworlds

Refinement of already reviewed diagnosis and explicit counterworld comparison of new classes; no refutation of all TFPT and no closure of a physical goal.

Read the exact result, assumptions and evidence

Result

The checked origin attempts leave operation alphabet, state/correlation family and intervention rule unspecified. This motivates a methodology change but does not prove global underdetermination of all complete P1/P2 models: scalar/matrix comparisons change A, while A, state and time belong to the full source tuple. The four independent classes force neither a five-direction carrier,3+2,E8,quartic nor TFPT clocks. Compare TFPT only after their characterization.

Required assumptions

  • TFPT for later comparison only

    The explicit research reset studies independent starting classes. E8, five,3+2, SM algebra, Yukawa data, Hilbert space, complex amplitudes and TFPT clocks are not inputs. Preserve existing TFPT results. After at most three failed origin attempts on unchanged premises change at least one fundamental premise or direction; coding bugs do not count. State assumptions, necessary consequences and newly explained properties.

Original evidence

  • PROOF.txt lines 1–44

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    experiments/theory-contracts/foundational-process-classification-20261016/PROOF.txt

    c478329caf5bfa8bbf69bf066745e9bbb9908d4652d52a428e04b6992bc385fa

  • PROOF.txt lines 228–256

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    experiments/theory-contracts/foundational-process-classification-20261016/PROOF.txt

    c478329caf5bfa8bbf69bf066745e9bbb9908d4652d52a428e04b6992bc385fa

finding:reset-diagnosis-not-global-tfpt-underdetermination

Established in scope

Independent order, information and composition classes

In the question: Observable reality: minimal conditions and counterworlds

Separate classes with separate premises, no shared physical derivation. Exact poset/endofunction censuses through size4 and elementary structural claims checked. Cycles do not select a canonical phase origin.

Read the exact result, assumptions and evidence

Result

Event posets provide ideal states and possible histories but do not generally select growth weights. Supplied finite updates give cycles/transients and closed record cells relative to errors/observation; sink SCCs count maximal separated record cells, not necessarily exhaustive invariant record functions. Transformation monoids allow stable sectors, periodic steps and visible classical noncommutativity together; action and effects remain inputs. Counterworlds show these properties do not follow from composition or information alone.

Required assumptions

  • Finite event order as starting data

    A finite strict partial order is supplied as event/precedence structure without metric, space, rates or probability. Order is an input in this class.

  • Supplied finite update, observation and errors

    Finite X, deterministic step f and observation o, optionally error support T, are inputs. A record-cell system is a family of disjoint nonempty forward-closed observationally distinguishable sets, not automatically an exhaustive invariant partition.

  • Supplied finite operational action and effects

    A transformation monoid acts on finite X; effects define operational distinguishability. Composition, action, effects and any selected time generator are separate starting data.

Original evidence

  • PROOF.txt lines 45–83

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    experiments/theory-contracts/foundational-process-classification-20261016/PROOF.txt

    c478329caf5bfa8bbf69bf066745e9bbb9908d4652d52a428e04b6992bc385fa

  • PROOF.txt lines 150–226

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    experiments/theory-contracts/foundational-process-classification-20261016/PROOF.txt

    c478329caf5bfa8bbf69bf066745e9bbb9908d4652d52a428e04b6992bc385fa

finding:independent-poset-information-composition-consequences

Established in scope

Complete binary three-interface classification

In the question: Observable reality: minimal conditions and counterworlds

Complete bounded classification of three binary interfaces; no particle/generation/dimension interpretation. One-shot consistency does not force a fixed order.

Read the exact result, assumptions and evidence

Result

Of 4096 no-self-influence candidates,744 are uniquely consistent under all64 local one-shot contexts.488 are acyclic; each of the remaining256 has an explicit reversible local two-copy control with zero or two fixed points (128 each). All744 process/order entries and256 witnesses were independently reproduced. The488 positive cases analytically work for all replica counts and arbitrary joint deterministic controls.

Required assumptions

  • Finite deterministic processes with full joint replica control

    Supply finite nonempty local input/output sets and total w:product O->product I. Every finite number of coordinatewise independent replicas allows every joint deterministic map I_k^M->O_k^M at corresponding interfaces, including constants/erasure. Require at least one global solution for every such experiment; do not assume a global order.

Original evidence

  • PROOF.txt lines 84–148

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    experiments/theory-contracts/foundational-process-classification-20261016/PROOF.txt

    c478329caf5bfa8bbf69bf066745e9bbb9908d4652d52a428e04b6992bc385fa

  • classify_composable.py lines 1–63

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    experiments/theory-contracts/foundational-process-classification-20261016/classify_composable.py

    7e6cbf827c6367cd88b0f75340175729274dc15ae64177f287df2846a5ebbc72

finding:three-binary-processes-two-copy-reversible-classification