Skip to main content

Explore the foundations and current research.

Follow the published construction into its registered claims, then explore reviewed research questions, attempts and the connections that remain open.

Reviewed results

519 matching reviewed results

Established in scope

Replica consistency exactly for acyclic influence structure

In the question: Observable reality: minimal conditions and counterworlds

General elementary finite deterministic theorem, mathematically reviewed twice. Arbitrary encoders, decoders and erasure are used; no general reversible two-copy theorem. Interfaces are not derived events. No novelty priority claim.

Read the exact result, assumptions and evidence

Result

For arbitrary finite alphabets/interfaces, existence under every finite joint local replica control, uniqueness under every such control, acyclic static influence and compatibility with at least one fixed total order are equivalent. A directed cycle of length m allows at most m copies with separately sensitized edges and odd XOR feedback without a solution. Acyclicity gives unique triangular recursion. No unique total order or physical time is selected.

Required assumptions

  • Finite deterministic processes with full joint replica control

    Supply finite nonempty local input/output sets and total w:product O->product I. Every finite number of coordinatewise independent replicas allows every joint deterministic map I_k^M->O_k^M at corresponding interfaces, including constants/erasure. Require at least one global solution for every such experiment; do not assume a global order.

Original evidence

  • COMPOSITION_CAUSALITY.txt lines 1–139

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    experiments/theory-contracts/foundational-process-classification-20261016/COMPOSITION_CAUSALITY.txt

    57cbb8dd7e9407cece44acd4ab5015300eb132657c3b5a255475066875009830

finding:replicated-deterministic-consistency-iff-influence-dag

Established in scope

Original Q twins are integrally conjugate before fixing the source form

In the question: Origin reverse selection, field dictionary and original P1 kernel

Exact algebraic equivalence of original unmarked pairs and covariance of full passive form transport. No claimed physical P1 symmetry, spatial mirror interpretation of detG, or independently produced source normalization. Original fixed source form and reader still distinguish marked realizations.

Read the exact result, assumptions and evidence

Result

Actual v568 pairs (U0,V0) and (U2,V2) have simultaneous GL3(Z) intertwiner G=[[1,0,0],[0,1,0],[0,2,-1]], G²=I,detG=-1, commuting with Sigma and fixing the specified winding data while sending leading vector (1,2,0) to (1,2,4). All simultaneous intertwiners are tG. The fixed theta(A)=Sigma A^T Sigma is not preserved and its reflected word gives4/8; transporting the entire form gives4/4. Explicit linear intertwiners connect the original three-rate clock to both Qplus/3, so rates alone do not select a twin.

Required assumptions

  • Do not identify source types

    Observable algebra, OS reflection, state, collar operator, time evolution, carrier connection, family holonomy, and readout are distinct data until an original map relates them.

Original evidence

  • GENESIS-RECURSION-AND-TWIN-TRANSPORT-20261102.txt lines 1–119

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    experiments/theory-contracts/tfpt-unified-source-derivation-20261029/aps_source_review/GENESIS-RECURSION-AND-TWIN-TRANSPORT-20261102.txt

    7968a3ad96a9cb0e288f1c606b78bbbd00248f6ad5ec0ef26de699baa0be7f61

  • check_genesis_twin_transport_20261102.py lines 1–62

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    experiments/theory-contracts/tfpt-unified-source-derivation-20261029/aps_source_review/check_genesis_twin_transport_20261102.py

    93490c0f6cc891812413934c9d5723695c4df8659608478337fe2b49bf7285c8

finding:r097-original-q-twins-are-integrally-conjugate-before-fixed-source-form

Established in scope

Periodic zero modes distinguish original covariance and Slater choice

In the question: Origin reverse selection, field dictionary and original P1 kernel

Exact finite original case. No nonexistence of B_N, selected continuum state or E8 refutation. Previous energy test uses twist1 without zero modes and is unchanged. Numerical norm diagnostics normal and -OO byte-identical; independent proof review and rerun accepted.

Read the exact result, assumptions and evidence

Result

On unchanged v988 Nx16 Ny6 M1, explicit integral boundary zero vectors, modular ranks over F65537 and exact sign pairing prove ranks190/192/192/192. Periodic counts are95 negative,95 positive,2 zero; other twists96/96/0. Original covariance C=Pminus+Pi0/2 differs from pure occ_frame projector P=Pminus+Q with rankQ1 in the nullspace: norm(C-P)HS²=1/2 and norm(C-C²)HS²=1/8. Both original functions are valid and deliberately distinct. A state-preserving microscopic dictionary cannot silently exchange these periodic states.

Required assumptions

  • Actual periodic v988 state and occupied frame

    Keep unchanged qwz_cylinder, occ_frame and fermi_cov at Nx16 Ny6 M1 and original twists0,1,2,3. Compare their actual finite CAR covariances. Physical selection of either state or equality with the E8 vacuum is not assumed.

  • Do not identify source types

    Observable algebra, OS reflection, state, collar operator, time evolution, carrier connection, family holonomy, and readout are distinct data until an original map relates them.

Original evidence

  • MICROSCOPIC-STATE.txt lines 1–82

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    experiments/theory-contracts/e-series-source-reconstruction-20261024/MICROSCOPIC-STATE.txt

    40359e2205b27adcd96bdbcc61d8adcc1a2788562df85058c076b8aac2d3b209

  • microscopic_state_audit.py lines 20–108

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    experiments/theory-contracts/e-series-source-reconstruction-20261024/microscopic_state_audit.py

    eb8dad78cc685d2951f9aec22966a622773c0d50e1ebd1706ef86a71320a9b6f

  • v988_psi_lambda_reduction.py lines 75–106

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    verification/v988_psi_lambda_reduction.py

    eae02e79be5703ccec67f1f11470e3ffd99895b17575c9ce1d553720bd1752cd

finding:periodic-microscopic-zero-modes-distinguish-source-state

Established in scope

First microscopic field and refinement map is unspecified in the original

In the question: Origin reverse selection, field dictionary and original P1 kernel

Source audit of this particular original path. No nonexistence claim for B_N and no rejection of the established P1/P2 compiler or mathematical E8 field extension.

Read the exact result, assumptions and evidence

Result

The original charged scaling contract starts with H_N as the actual QWZ/CAR GNS space and declares Psi_lambda,N by a normal boson exponential. Its concrete refinements I_charge tensor Gamma_s(j) act instead on a separately chosen bosonic lattice Fock space. No microscopic B_N between these systems with B_2N J_N,2N=V_N,2N B_N and state, energy, parity, sector and localization compatibility is constructed there. The exact charge-lattice isometry F(2q)=lambda does not replace this field morphism.

Required assumptions

  • Literal charged scaling contract and original Slater case

    Audit actual H_N, Psi_lambda,N and bosonic refinement definitions in the original charged scaling contract and unchanged v988 qwz_cylinder/occ_frame functions at Nx16,Ny6,M1, h0 at twist0 and Slater state at twist1. This audits that source path and finite energy case, without assuming microscopic bosonization or a uniform continuum bound.

  • Do not identify source types

    Observable algebra, OS reflection, state, collar operator, time evolution, carrier connection, family holonomy, and readout are distinct data until an original map relates them.

Original evidence

  • SCALAR-QUARTER-REPRODUCTION.txt lines 175–206

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    experiments/theory-contracts/e-series-source-reconstruction-20261024/SCALAR-QUARTER-REPRODUCTION.txt

    16e123a72d0d65e48fc1777bbc0b3a10a7585114c3f82bad33c87e0794e15f94

  • 001-section-verdict-and-logical-form.tex lines 120–224

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    documents/articles--2026-08-30--mmst_charged_scaling_limit_en/sections/001-section-verdict-and-logical-form.tex

    e75e10cc33137187e6c494e8486ffdec91e43d6b636d434ce0735d97e56a9c7f

  • 002-section-l1-uniform-energy-bounds.tex lines 300–339

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    documents/articles--2026-08-30--mmst_charged_scaling_limit_en/sections/002-section-l1-uniform-energy-bounds.tex

    b89310f1d15704cdd1159294db718353ae140c508cbfd67fabcf6e53883b06c5

finding:charged-scaling-microscopic-map-still-unspecified

Established in scope

All248 boundary currents have explicit multi-field responses

In the question: Origin reverse selection, field dictionary and original P1 kernel

Stipulated E8_1 lattice vacuum representation. Bosonic currents are not identified with elementary4D fermions or native CCR mediators. Internal quarter grading is not physical quarter time. Contact terms, Z[0], absolute phase and original P1 Phi-dependence do not follow from these normalized coefficients.

Read the exact result, assumptions and evidence

Result

The executable E8 dictionary contains240 root vertices and8 Cartan currents with cocycle, adjoint signs and quarter grades60/64/60/64. The vertex formula and Cartan Ward recursion determine all separated current coefficients of the normalized source series. Mixed spinor currents have5/8+3/8=1; the checked connected four-point response is nonzero. Standard lattice theory implemented and independently checked here, not a new physical interaction.

Required assumptions

  • Reverse selection in the discrete closure framework

    The origin paper discrete E8 closure framework with rank, family, spinor and simple-current conditions is given. Its numerical fixed-point identities are not identified with a physical operator realization.

  • Given local E8_1 vacuum representation and explicit cocycle

    Positive level-one E8 lattice vacuum representation in orthonormal D5+D3 coordinates, declared simple-root cocycle, level-one Heisenberg Ward rules and internal quarter character v=(0^5,1/2^3). Insertions are separated. No raw-P1 pullback or physical time law is assumed or derived from this representation.

  • Quarter phase is retained

    Comparisons retain the original charged quarter phase; switching to another phase branch is not an admissible solution to the selection problem.

  • Do not identify source types

    Observable algebra, OS reflection, state, collar operator, time evolution, carrier connection, family holonomy, and readout are distinct data until an original map relates them.

Original evidence

  • E8-BOUNDARY-DICTIONARY.txt lines 26–121

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    experiments/theory-contracts/seam-collar-multifield-20261016/E8-BOUNDARY-DICTIONARY.txt

    ed4f112b566060bdaffa8f7490405004ac300a0d2a1be33c8bb3eda3f0614362

  • e8_boundary_response.py lines 1–160

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    experiments/theory-contracts/seam-collar-multifield-20261016/e8_boundary_response.py

    8a77bef68666dd18470fce78e04881676862075d216587b291c9e2c3761d5e6b

  • e8_boundary_response.py lines 161–294

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    experiments/theory-contracts/seam-collar-multifield-20261016/e8_boundary_response.py

    8a77bef68666dd18470fce78e04881676862075d216587b291c9e2c3761d5e6b

  • PROOF.txt lines 858–895

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    experiments/theory-contracts/seam-joint-ward-state-20261014/PROOF.txt

    7c0cd92dfc5eca88260baae0af9edad66f958a27ce0d15d7965414b3971f8da0

finding:e8-current-dictionary-all-separated-responses

Established in scope

Reverse selection is retained; the checked maps supply numbers and closure data

In the question: Origin reverse selection, field dictionary and original P1 kernel

Source audit of the specified reverse chain. No retraction of numerical self-consistency and no independent derivation of the framework.

Read the exact result, assumptions and evidence

Result

Origin954–981 and v6/v15/v350–v352 recover g_car=5 and eight within the chosen closure framework; v154 supplies the conditional local extension. The checked v350–v352 functions do not construct Phi-dependent D_rel/D_ref or physical insertion operators. This scopes those calculations, rather than asserting general impossibility.

Required assumptions

  • Reverse selection in the discrete closure framework

    The origin paper discrete E8 closure framework with rank, family, spinor and simple-current conditions is given. Its numerical fixed-point identities are not identified with a physical operator realization.

  • Do not identify source types

    Observable algebra, OS reflection, state, collar operator, time evolution, carrier connection, family holonomy, and readout are distinct data until an original map relates them.

Original evidence

finding:reverse-bootstrap-retained-operator-scope

Established in scope

Already proved: three and five are two canonical views of the same four-mark system

In the question: Origin reverse selection, field dictionary and original P1 kernel

Two canonical invariants of the given four-mark object. Not a new proof task; evaluate original field/state maps separately. This records an existing result to repair retrieval and continuity, without claiming a new scientific finding.

Read the exact result, assumptions and evidence

Result

Existing v189 and the Origin paper obtain rank H1(P1\D)=3 and h0(P1,O(D))=5 from ONE four-point divisor D=mu4 on P1. This is an established common geometrical/topological origin of both numbers, not a new hypothesis or reopened task. Retain known anchor identities and reverse selection. Every genesis continuation starts from this theorem; open further source maps do not downgrade it.

Required assumptions

  • Do not identify source types

    Observable algebra, OS reflection, state, collar operator, time evolution, carrier connection, family holonomy, and readout are distinct data until an original map relates them.

Original evidence

finding:known-fourmark-system-has-three-and-five-canonical-views

Established in scope

Strictly negative original quark crossing covariance

In the question: Automated construction of operator maps and sources

Only the specified R096 branch under its jointly required premises. No derived physical Higgs measure, general H(x) field theory or P1 source completion.

Read the exact result, assumptions and evidence

Result

For actual X_H=(2cosh(ell h_H))^-1, g(u)=Tr_Q X_H=6sum_j[2cosh(ell sqrt(p²+y_j²u))]^-1. Under the specified real face frame and positive nonconstant radial law g strictly decreases, f(u)=u/(1+u) strictly increases, and Cov_mu(f,B_Q)<0. The face identifications cannot be independently rotated without the actual transport.

Required assumptions

  • Same constant Higgs and two-face carrier

    R096 compares the same original constant Higgs parameter on the same actual two-face CAR carrier and fixed source caller. Face labels are not internal chiral L/R labels. This is a conditional source comparison, not derivation of the primitive P1 identification.

  • Real face frame and positive nonconstant radial law

    The negative mixed covariance witness uses the original 36-dimensional quark particle module with one common real face frame, ell>0, p>0 and at least one nonzero original Yukawa singular value. Mu is positive normalized and u=H†H is not almost surely constant. Independent face gauge transport is not supplied.

Original evidence

  • JOINT-HIGGS-TWOFACE-SOURCE-CONSTRAINT-20261102.txt lines 64–93

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    experiments/theory-contracts/tfpt-unified-source-derivation-20261029/aps_source_review/JOINT-HIGGS-TWOFACE-SOURCE-CONSTRAINT-20261102.txt

    db30b33db3c1d4528c65e0ffb6951ef1276710b5958afa10f06a04990c6dbd33

finding:r096-original-quark-crossing-negative-covariance

Established in scope

Linear mixed-source identity without positivity

In the question: Automated construction of operator maps and sources

Only the specified R096 branch under its jointly required premises. No derived physical Higgs measure, general H(x) field theory or P1 source completion.

Read the exact result, assumptions and evidence

Result

The conditional identities <O>_H=24m(H)^2 and <N>_H=3m(H) give Z[O]=8Z[mN] with the same integrable unnormalized weights. Positivity is unnecessary for this branch. Actual origin of the mixed insertion in the original solver remains open.

Required assumptions

  • Same constant Higgs and two-face carrier

    R096 compares the same original constant Higgs parameter on the same actual two-face CAR carrier and fixed source caller. Face labels are not internal chiral L/R labels. This is a conditional source comparison, not derivation of the primitive P1 identification.

  • Actual R054 color-symmetric quasifree fibers

    The four-word connection uses the actual constant color-symmetric conditionally quasifree R054 fermion fibers on the same carrier: <O>_H=24m(H)^2 and <N>_H=3m(H). The averaged source is not assumed quasifree.

  • Identical integrable unnormalized weights and insertions

    The linear identity Z[O]=8Z[mN] uses identical integrable unnormalized weights and conditional fiber values on both sides. Positivity or finite complex normalization is not assumed for this linear statement. Physical use still requires deriving the mixed insertion from the original alphabet.

Original evidence

  • JOINT-HIGGS-TWOFACE-SOURCE-CONSTRAINT-20261102.txt lines 46–62

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    experiments/theory-contracts/tfpt-unified-source-derivation-20261029/aps_source_review/JOINT-HIGGS-TWOFACE-SOURCE-CONSTRAINT-20261102.txt

    db30b33db3c1d4528c65e0ffb6951ef1276710b5958afa10f06a04990c6dbd33

finding:r096-unnormalized-mixed-source-linear-identity

Established in scope

Quantitative joint positive two-face bound

In the question: Automated construction of operator maps and sources

Only the specified R096 branch under its jointly required premises. No derived physical Higgs measure, general H(x) field theory or P1 source completion.

Read the exact result, assumptions and evidence

Result

For Pbar=integral P_H dmu and m=Tr(L P_H L), Tr L(Pbar-Pbar²)L>=Var_mu(m)/6. Under the additional named R054 fiber premises Delta_O=24Var_mu(m), giving the same lower bound Delta_O/144. Var(m)>0 excludes projection of Pbar; a pure primitive state before H integration remains possible.

Required assumptions

  • Same constant Higgs and two-face carrier

    R096 compares the same original constant Higgs parameter on the same actual two-face CAR carrier and fixed source caller. Face labels are not internal chiral L/R labels. This is a conditional source comparison, not derivation of the primitive P1 identification.

  • Positive normalized mixture of covariance contractions

    For the quantitative two-face defect mu is positive normalized, each conditional covariance P_H is self-adjoint with 0<=P_H<=1 on the same CAR space, and L is the fixed rank-six projector. Pbar uses precisely these weights.

  • Actual R054 color-symmetric quasifree fibers

    The four-word connection uses the actual constant color-symmetric conditionally quasifree R054 fermion fibers on the same carrier: <O>_H=24m(H)^2 and <N>_H=3m(H). The averaged source is not assumed quasifree.

Original evidence

  • JOINT-HIGGS-TWOFACE-SOURCE-CONSTRAINT-20261102.txt lines 15–44

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    experiments/theory-contracts/tfpt-unified-source-derivation-20261029/aps_source_review/JOINT-HIGGS-TWOFACE-SOURCE-CONSTRAINT-20261102.txt

    db30b33db3c1d4528c65e0ffb6951ef1276710b5958afa10f06a04990c6dbd33

finding:r096-positive-twoface-fourword-defect-bound

Established in scope

Joint Higgs and two-face response gives quantitative source constraint

In the question: Automated construction of operator maps and sources

Constant Higgs and same actual two-face carrier, color symmetry and R054 conditional quasifreeness for the four-word part. No derived physical Higgs measure, general H(x), P1 seam, or independent gauge transport. The mixed source insertion is not assumed present in search alphabets without an actual source map.

Read the exact result, assumptions and evidence

Result

For one positive Higgs mixture and full two-face covariance, Tr L(Pbar-Pbar²)L >= Var(m)/6 = DeltaO/144 under R054 conditional quasifree premises, strengthening the earlier qualitative nonprojection result. The unnormalized linear identity Z[O]=8 Z[mN] requires matching conditional fibers and weights, not positivity. On the original 36-dimensional quark carrier the two-face trace g(u)=6 sum_j[2 cosh(ell sqrt(p²+y_j²u))]^-1 is strictly decreasing, implying Cov(u/(1+u),B_Q)<0 for a positive nonpoint radial law. Original 96 constructor and exact abstract rank-six control checked.

Required assumptions

  • Do not identify source types

    Observable algebra, OS reflection, state, collar operator, time evolution, carrier connection, family holonomy, and readout are distinct data until an original map relates them.

  • Same constant Higgs and two-face carrier

    R096 compares the same original constant Higgs parameter on the same actual two-face CAR carrier and fixed source caller. Face labels are not internal chiral L/R labels. This is a conditional source comparison, not derivation of the primitive P1 identification.

Original evidence

  • JOINT-HIGGS-TWOFACE-SOURCE-CONSTRAINT-20261102.txt lines 1–103

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    experiments/theory-contracts/tfpt-unified-source-derivation-20261029/aps_source_review/JOINT-HIGGS-TWOFACE-SOURCE-CONSTRAINT-20261102.txt

    db30b33db3c1d4528c65e0ffb6951ef1276710b5958afa10f06a04990c6dbd33

  • check_joint_higgs_twoface_response_20261102.py lines 1–75

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    experiments/theory-contracts/tfpt-unified-source-derivation-20261029/aps_source_review/check_joint_higgs_twoface_response_20261102.py

    ae371b2f9917fd5cfafa8a754a125bf2def5fa79ed2d5bc0775ad07e092a0424

finding:r096-joint-higgs-twoface-source-constraint

Established in scope

Original five source inputs are excitations, not the clustering vacuum for this time

In the question: Automated construction of operator maps and sources

Fixed original CAR time and admissible eight-arc word; the P1 seed does not specify the clustering direction. No exclusion of other P1 times or states, finite KMS interval, CAR vacuum, or excited insertions; no derivation of P1 localization, reflection or physics. The input basis is not orthonormal.

Read the exact result, assumptions and evidence

Result

All five original charge-zero inputs have K_alpha energy 4. The original J8 Gram is positive definite for both quarters with the stated exact determinant. A smooth quotient profile with nonzero first coefficient gives a bounded eight-arc Weyl word that reaches energy 3 from every nonzero vector in the input span. The connected Euclidean response based on K_alpha-4 grows on the infinite half-line; the same applies to positive states supported entirely in this span. The P0 vacuum channel J32 has the two exact R32 weights in the source. The R093 response remains an original vacuum word with the finite raising-current polynomials B_i.

Required assumptions

  • Do not identify source types

    Observable algebra, OS reflection, state, collar operator, time evolution, carrier connection, family holonomy, and readout are distinct data until an original map relates them.

Original evidence

  • ORIGINAL-FIVE-INPUT-STATE-AND-VACUUM-CLUSTER-20261102.txt lines 1–95

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    experiments/theory-contracts/tfpt-unified-source-derivation-20261029/aps_source_review/ORIGINAL-FIVE-INPUT-STATE-AND-VACUUM-CLUSTER-20261102.txt

    daa072468c8e6be3b35285710869833a88e50b35edecbe16792aea9ad28a7dc4

  • check_original_excitation_cluster_20261102.py lines 1–27

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    experiments/theory-contracts/tfpt-unified-source-derivation-20261029/aps_source_review/check_original_excitation_cluster_20261102.py

    14e051950e7f29239f9475289989b5ce993d2157f2dae73c92f7864b93a8d7f7

finding:r094-original-five-excitations-distinct-from-clustering-vacuum