Algebraic uniqueness under the stipulated Pascal/half-spinor exhaustion condition. Original source and proof text reviewed; no fresh Lean kernel run. AX.P2.01 remains a declared physical interface; the equation does not select itself from an original source.
Read the exact result, assumptions and evidence
Result
CarrierRankUniqueness.carrier_rank_pascal_unique states and proves for every natural g that 2^g=g^2+g+2 iff g=5. Its proof combines the small cases with pascal_growth for all g>=6. This is unbounded; PascalLadder has a separate bounded K=2 statement. For g=5, N_fam=3 and g+N_fam=8 are computed.
Required assumptions
Pascal exhaustion condition as input
g is natural; the stipulated equation is 2^g=g^2+g+2. The equation itself is the additional carrier exhaustion rule.
Conditional representation theorem without novelty claim, not efficient or local physical simulation. History/preparation dependence and growing memory are allowed; Bell, noncontextuality or resource witnesses under independently justified extra conditions are not invalidated. Protocol direction is assumed, not physical causality derived.
Read the exact result, assumptions and evidence
Result
Every finite normalized prefix-consistent response family with past marginals independent of future choices has a finite classical stochastic realization: preparation/full history as memory, conditional ratios as transitions, append the next choice/report pair. The construction also reproduces adaptive protocols. It was checked exactly on all requested D tables through horizon4. Finite sequential disturbance and order dependence alone do not exclude unrestricted classical history models.
Supply finite preparation/action/report sets, finite horizon and nonnegative normalized sequential probability tables. Summing out the last report recovers prefixes and earlier marginals do not depend on future choices. Impose no memory, locality, stationarity or preparation-noncontextuality bounds on the representation.
Standard residual representation consequence and explicit counterexamples, not a new ontology. Distinguishability, repeatability, context reproduction and serial availability are separate assumptions. Separate L1/L2 from L3.
Read the exact result, assumptions and evidence
Result
The separate benchmark assumptions give at least two continuation-distinguishable classes and preserve the selected report label under uninterrupted repetition. This largely restates the substantive repeatability premise rather than explaining physical origin. A test can preserve its report while incrementing a separately readable modulo3 counter; result repetition therefore forces no complete idempotence, preservation of all correlations, metric time or eternal material memory. Possible reports alone select no numerical weights.
Required assumptions
Explicit repeatable-distinction benchmark
Recognizable reports, reproducibility of a declared context and available serial continuations are separate commitments. The sharp benchmark additionally has an immediately result-repeatable test and two preparations with different certain reports. These conditions are stronger than mere observability; probability, free erasure, re-preparation, replica control or physical time are not assumed to follow.
Three countermodels, not an exhaustive classification of operational worlds. I/D assume probabilities/convexity; their numbers are predictions, not new measurements or physical dimensions. All-context equality follows analytically from linearity, not the finite word check.
Read the exact result, assumptions and evidence
Result
Three explicit single-system theories satisfy the same sharp repeatability benchmark and are operationally inequivalent: R has two classes without mixing, I a classical simplex, D a square with nonunique decompositions. XZX preserves the first X report with probability1 in I and1/2 in D; D identifies both diagonal mixtures under all generated protocols while I distinguishes them by parity. All30 X/Z words through length4 were checked exactly. D has a classical hidden two-bit implementation of its generators; not all classical models are excluded.
Required assumptions
Explicit repeatable-distinction benchmark
Recognizable reports, reproducibility of a declared context and available serial continuations are separate commitments. The sharp benchmark additionally has an immediately result-repeatable test and two preparations with different certain reports. These conditions are stronger than mere observability; probability, free erasure, re-preparation, replica control or physical time are not assumed to follow.
Three explicit operational countermodels
R has deterministic preparation/read traces and continued partial-identity branches only, no primitive mixing or internal re-preparation. I is the classical two-bit simplex with probabilities and nondisturbing joint access. D is the square with explicit positive X/Z branches, square symmetries, preparations, mixtures and finite serial/adaptive closure. These selected rules define counterworlds rather than necessary physics.
Refinement of already reviewed diagnosis and explicit counterworld comparison of new classes; no refutation of all TFPT and no closure of a physical goal.
Read the exact result, assumptions and evidence
Result
The checked origin attempts leave operation alphabet, state/correlation family and intervention rule unspecified. This motivates a methodology change but does not prove global underdetermination of all complete P1/P2 models: scalar/matrix comparisons change A, while A, state and time belong to the full source tuple. The four independent classes force neither a five-direction carrier,3+2,E8,quartic nor TFPT clocks. Compare TFPT only after their characterization.
Required assumptions
TFPT for later comparison only
The explicit research reset studies independent starting classes. E8, five,3+2, SM algebra, Yukawa data, Hilbert space, complex amplitudes and TFPT clocks are not inputs. Preserve existing TFPT results. After at most three failed origin attempts on unchanged premises change at least one fundamental premise or direction; coding bugs do not count. State assumptions, necessary consequences and newly explained properties.
Separate classes with separate premises, no shared physical derivation. Exact poset/endofunction censuses through size4 and elementary structural claims checked. Cycles do not select a canonical phase origin.
Read the exact result, assumptions and evidence
Result
Event posets provide ideal states and possible histories but do not generally select growth weights. Supplied finite updates give cycles/transients and closed record cells relative to errors/observation; sink SCCs count maximal separated record cells, not necessarily exhaustive invariant record functions. Transformation monoids allow stable sectors, periodic steps and visible classical noncommutativity together; action and effects remain inputs. Counterworlds show these properties do not follow from composition or information alone.
Required assumptions
Finite event order as starting data
A finite strict partial order is supplied as event/precedence structure without metric, space, rates or probability. Order is an input in this class.
Supplied finite update, observation and errors
Finite X, deterministic step f and observation o, optionally error support T, are inputs. A record-cell system is a family of disjoint nonempty forward-closed observationally distinguishable sets, not automatically an exhaustive invariant partition.
Supplied finite operational action and effects
A transformation monoid acts on finite X; effects define operational distinguishability. Composition, action, effects and any selected time generator are separate starting data.
Complete bounded classification of three binary interfaces; no particle/generation/dimension interpretation. One-shot consistency does not force a fixed order.
Read the exact result, assumptions and evidence
Result
Of 4096 no-self-influence candidates,744 are uniquely consistent under all64 local one-shot contexts.488 are acyclic; each of the remaining256 has an explicit reversible local two-copy control with zero or two fixed points (128 each). All744 process/order entries and256 witnesses were independently reproduced. The488 positive cases analytically work for all replica counts and arbitrary joint deterministic controls.
Required assumptions
Finite deterministic processes with full joint replica control
Supply finite nonempty local input/output sets and total w:product O->product I. Every finite number of coordinatewise independent replicas allows every joint deterministic map I_k^M->O_k^M at corresponding interfaces, including constants/erasure. Require at least one global solution for every such experiment; do not assume a global order.
General elementary finite deterministic theorem, mathematically reviewed twice. Arbitrary encoders, decoders and erasure are used; no general reversible two-copy theorem. Interfaces are not derived events. No novelty priority claim.
Read the exact result, assumptions and evidence
Result
For arbitrary finite alphabets/interfaces, existence under every finite joint local replica control, uniqueness under every such control, acyclic static influence and compatibility with at least one fixed total order are equivalent. A directed cycle of length m allows at most m copies with separately sensitized edges and odd XOR feedback without a solution. Acyclicity gives unique triangular recursion. No unique total order or physical time is selected.
Required assumptions
Finite deterministic processes with full joint replica control
Supply finite nonempty local input/output sets and total w:product O->product I. Every finite number of coordinatewise independent replicas allows every joint deterministic map I_k^M->O_k^M at corresponding interfaces, including constants/erasure. Require at least one global solution for every such experiment; do not assume a global order.
Exact algebraic equivalence of original unmarked pairs and covariance of full passive form transport. No claimed physical P1 symmetry, spatial mirror interpretation of detG, or independently produced source normalization. Original fixed source form and reader still distinguish marked realizations.
Read the exact result, assumptions and evidence
Result
Actual v568 pairs (U0,V0) and (U2,V2) have simultaneous GL3(Z) intertwiner G=[[1,0,0],[0,1,0],[0,2,-1]], G²=I,detG=-1, commuting with Sigma and fixing the specified winding data while sending leading vector (1,2,0) to (1,2,4). All simultaneous intertwiners are tG. The fixed theta(A)=Sigma A^T Sigma is not preserved and its reflected word gives4/8; transporting the entire form gives4/4. Explicit linear intertwiners connect the original three-rate clock to both Qplus/3, so rates alone do not select a twin.
Required assumptions
Do not identify source types
Observable algebra, OS reflection, state, collar operator, time evolution, carrier connection, family holonomy, and readout are distinct data until an original map relates them.
Exact finite original case. No nonexistence of B_N, selected continuum state or E8 refutation. Previous energy test uses twist1 without zero modes and is unchanged. Numerical norm diagnostics normal and -OO byte-identical; independent proof review and rerun accepted.
Read the exact result, assumptions and evidence
Result
On unchanged v988 Nx16 Ny6 M1, explicit integral boundary zero vectors, modular ranks over F65537 and exact sign pairing prove ranks190/192/192/192. Periodic counts are95 negative,95 positive,2 zero; other twists96/96/0. Original covariance C=Pminus+Pi0/2 differs from pure occ_frame projector P=Pminus+Q with rankQ1 in the nullspace: norm(C-P)HS²=1/2 and norm(C-C²)HS²=1/8. Both original functions are valid and deliberately distinct. A state-preserving microscopic dictionary cannot silently exchange these periodic states.
Required assumptions
Actual periodic v988 state and occupied frame
Keep unchanged qwz_cylinder, occ_frame and fermi_cov at Nx16 Ny6 M1 and original twists0,1,2,3. Compare their actual finite CAR covariances. Physical selection of either state or equality with the E8 vacuum is not assumed.
Do not identify source types
Observable algebra, OS reflection, state, collar operator, time evolution, carrier connection, family holonomy, and readout are distinct data until an original map relates them.
Source audit of this particular original path. No nonexistence claim for B_N and no rejection of the established P1/P2 compiler or mathematical E8 field extension.
Read the exact result, assumptions and evidence
Result
The original charged scaling contract starts with H_N as the actual QWZ/CAR GNS space and declares Psi_lambda,N by a normal boson exponential. Its concrete refinements I_charge tensor Gamma_s(j) act instead on a separately chosen bosonic lattice Fock space. No microscopic B_N between these systems with B_2N J_N,2N=V_N,2N B_N and state, energy, parity, sector and localization compatibility is constructed there. The exact charge-lattice isometry F(2q)=lambda does not replace this field morphism.
Required assumptions
Literal charged scaling contract and original Slater case
Audit actual H_N, Psi_lambda,N and bosonic refinement definitions in the original charged scaling contract and unchanged v988 qwz_cylinder/occ_frame functions at Nx16,Ny6,M1, h0 at twist0 and Slater state at twist1. This audits that source path and finite energy case, without assuming microscopic bosonization or a uniform continuum bound.
Do not identify source types
Observable algebra, OS reflection, state, collar operator, time evolution, carrier connection, family holonomy, and readout are distinct data until an original map relates them.
Stipulated E8_1 lattice vacuum representation. Bosonic currents are not identified with elementary4D fermions or native CCR mediators. Internal quarter grading is not physical quarter time. Contact terms, Z[0], absolute phase and original P1 Phi-dependence do not follow from these normalized coefficients.
Read the exact result, assumptions and evidence
Result
The executable E8 dictionary contains240 root vertices and8 Cartan currents with cocycle, adjoint signs and quarter grades60/64/60/64. The vertex formula and Cartan Ward recursion determine all separated current coefficients of the normalized source series. Mixed spinor currents have5/8+3/8=1; the checked connected four-point response is nonzero. Standard lattice theory implemented and independently checked here, not a new physical interaction.
Required assumptions
Reverse selection in the discrete closure framework
The origin paper discrete E8 closure framework with rank, family, spinor and simple-current conditions is given. Its numerical fixed-point identities are not identified with a physical operator realization.
Given local E8_1 vacuum representation and explicit cocycle
Positive level-one E8 lattice vacuum representation in orthonormal D5+D3 coordinates, declared simple-root cocycle, level-one Heisenberg Ward rules and internal quarter character v=(0^5,1/2^3). Insertions are separated. No raw-P1 pullback or physical time law is assumed or derived from this representation.
Quarter phase is retained
Comparisons retain the original charged quarter phase; switching to another phase branch is not an admissible solution to the selection problem.
Do not identify source types
Observable algebra, OS reflection, state, collar operator, time evolution, carrier connection, family holonomy, and readout are distinct data until an original map relates them.