Skip to main content

Explore the foundations and current research.

Follow the published construction into its registered claims, then explore reviewed research questions, attempts and the connections that remain open.

Historical attempts

Original experiment and contract metadata. A reported PASS is a historical verdict, not an independently reviewed result. Only explicit Atlas links are used when filtering by research area.

569 matching attempt records

ccc crossover discnull (SMICA pass): no top-hat disc excess above the Gaussian LCDM null battery; well-powered at the frozen radius band; replication legs not needed for a null

Original historical attempt metadata. A reported PASS is not a reviewed theorem, a fresh run or physical completion.

  • README.md lines 1–111

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    experiments/ccc-crossover-disc/README.md

    c8b0a0195c5e9b645eaf211446dd6f33a77c39bc0dd9e6efc4447873c7e16093

  • results.json lines 1–69

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    experiments/ccc-crossover-disc/results/results.json

    1d533df663c8042a99ea852f22a1f4c1bd3958757169e7d459e6271a495e5fa3

experiment:ccc-crossover-disc

cmb birefringence seedconsistent with the seed line: one frozen phi0 fits beta and Omega_b and the line Omega_b/beta_rad = 4pi-1 holds within errors (NOT validated -- beta errors are wide and the joint covariance is unmodelled)

Original historical attempt metadata. A reported PASS is not a reviewed theorem, a fresh run or physical completion.

  • README.md lines 1–155

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    experiments/cmb-birefringence-seed/README.md

    20e1dd01177032a78414c830e499f123d54b985a93199e341ad2079c9563f76d

  • results.json lines 1–224

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    experiments/cmb-birefringence-seed/results/results.json

    0e7f222138055e5a512e76ca1c8df6f8eb2d1667d25d4869b0fb35ddeae0e6d8

experiment:cmb-birefringence-seed

cmb eb logcombnull

Original historical attempt metadata. A reported PASS is not a reviewed theorem, a fresh run or physical completion.

  • README.md lines 1–86

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    experiments/cmb-eb-logcomb/README.md

    24c6125ea3b0328186daf8267e50f80b83aab5b7e5cbb7786450f4144cdbfa70

  • results.json lines 1–182

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    experiments/cmb-eb-logcomb/results/results.json

    3bddfc938318673a9fa798d9c0731fdbf819d896d3f513b776cb7299a97fa8e1

experiment:cmb-eb-logcomb

cmb inflation scalaronn_s point 0.9611: consistent with Planck, tension with the DESI-combined value; r point 0.0045 below BK18 (sharp future falsifier at CMB-S4); A_s point is -11.3 sigma -> the measured A_s requires faster reheating (N_star ~ 56.1). All [C]: N_star is an input, M_scal and R+R^2 are [E].

Original historical attempt metadata. A reported PASS is not a reviewed theorem, a fresh run or physical completion.

  • README.md lines 1–63

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    experiments/cmb-inflation-scalaron/README.md

    0f5bb0db293c266e00d01e734330c7406b0ecc40d15a91b201c488a06e34ea46

  • results.json lines 1–174

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    experiments/cmb-inflation-scalaron/results/results.json

    0fcabcc96c9633517aa1b65cd934a28e068f25d3b74171617627019c4093893b

experiment:cmb-inflation-scalaron

cmb primordial logcombdata_limited

Original historical attempt metadata. A reported PASS is not a reviewed theorem, a fresh run or physical completion.

  • README.md lines 1–103

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    experiments/cmb-primordial-logcomb/README.md

    b3cc2a7156f7c4e29a31dbed44c3be40d08603825212b9299a2f583a6aa64cec

  • results.json lines 1–60

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    experiments/cmb-primordial-logcomb/results/results.json

    ca3db47e57aa88936e7d1f45c7ac040f8f318c2abafe79555fc58784792497d8

experiment:cmb-primordial-logcomb

comb meta limitVerdict not recorded

Original historical attempt metadata. A reported PASS is not a reviewed theorem, a fresh run or physical completion.

  • README.md lines 1–142

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    experiments/comb-meta-limit/README.md

    42ed38bc720e730ada01451a4e0810d8932131666c0853f32585711719ff64f3

  • results.json lines 1–901

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    experiments/comb-meta-limit/results/results.json

    64cf0e60969110244e6e153fda91f597d976fdacad87ead64050bd71742a4052

experiment:comb-meta-limit

cosmic dipole watchdogdata_limited

Original historical attempt metadata. A reported PASS is not a reviewed theorem, a fresh run or physical completion.

  • README.md lines 1–65

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    experiments/cosmic-dipole-watchdog/README.md

    bba54be4e2bc1e19ae85356b30137d7891044d5217aaf93e5d5f232ece0179ee

  • results.json lines 1–76

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    experiments/cosmic-dipole-watchdog/results/results.json

    ebe07b6415de60563eaf0ded02f5dad45fca68e832c59dab9db440b406640e09

experiment:cosmic-dipole-watchdog

cosmic handednessFRONTIER WATCHDOG (data_limited): the JADES excess is a ~3.3 sigma MONOPOLE, but it is most likely a Milky-Way-rotation aberration (a DIPOLE), and Galaxy Zoo found isotropy. TFPT allows only a tiny boundary remnant, so it does NOT predict a ~20% asymmetry: approximate parity is the prediction. A robust global parity monopole surviving MW-aberration + selection systematics across surveys would become a frontier parent-spin candidate -- not yet, and never the compiler core. A pure dipole is a systematic, not a signal.

Original historical attempt metadata. A reported PASS is not a reviewed theorem, a fresh run or physical completion.

  • README.md lines 1–48

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    experiments/cosmic-handedness/README.md

    65ada0db91f9bf3242e065b99d2f709b1c7d5cd0f4dd910638a822c46414cf58

  • results.json lines 1–25

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    experiments/cosmic-handedness/results/results.json

    18acb9f9841964ed8e5c843184c6fbd24738c2eb01502047f39fe48e815c2a68

experiment:cosmic-handedness

crust cooling comb8 crust-cooling episodes across 6 quasi-persistent transients (KS 1731-260, MXB 1659-29 x2, XTE J1701-462, EXO 0748-676, MAXI J0556-332 x2, Aql X-1). Every single cooling curve is RANGE-BLIND for the (3/2)^6 comb (best = 2.46 < 2.8 periods), so the phase-incoherent kernel stack has n_used=0 and cannot test omega=2.583. The superposed-epoch pooled stack (3.08 periods) CAN: omega=2.583 is NOT special in the superposed-epoch pooled stack (p=0.4539, 3.08 pooled comb periods). The TFPT lambda-battery is a clean NULL after look-elsewhere (Bonferroni global p=1.0); 7/8 episodes show a significant nonzero core-equilibrium floor (consistent with the TFPT protected floor, but generic crust physics). Injection on the REAL sampling: a strong comb (eps=15%) is recovered 100% and the null false-alarm is 5%, BUT the PREDICTED eps~2% is detected only 2% -> the stack is UNDERPOWERED on the intrinsic amplitude (density-poor). VERDICT: data_limited -- crust cooling has the right FLOOR-TERMINATED character but is range/density-limited for the discriminating ~2% omega=2.583 comb; it serves as an honest 2nd world only via the (low-specificity) lambda-battery NULL. FIREWALL: surface heat diffusion, not a horizon recovery -> no hit here could ever be TFPT confirmation. No claim; nothing [E].

Original historical attempt metadata. A reported PASS is not a reviewed theorem, a fresh run or physical completion.

  • README.md lines 1–117

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    experiments/crust-cooling-comb/README.md

    30f7091ef29b54bef6ca1134d83587f531243259bd2aa1d657f95c7df162dc6a

  • results.json lines 1–391

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    experiments/crust-cooling-comb/results/results.json

    f68076f5445578c3e261869924e702e431d502f71dacb8c63c3aa04598cd85fb

experiment:crust-cooling-comb

dark energy w watchdogWATCHDOG ARMED (data_limited): strongest overlap-aware exclusion of w=-1 is 4.4 sigma (< 5.0) on the frozen 2025 baseline. 2026 status: that headline is known to be calibration-inflated (DES-Dovekie: 4.2 -> 3.2 sigma; Bayesian DESI+CMB-only ln B = -0.57) -- the preference is dissolving, as TFPT's w=-1 fixed point requires; Union3-driven frequentist pulls (~3.8 sigma) remain. Not a TFPT kill.

Original historical attempt metadata. A reported PASS is not a reviewed theorem, a fresh run or physical completion.

  • README.md lines 1–83

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    experiments/dark-energy-w-watchdog/README.md

    0892d01233610a9aa92d4ca5553aa8f7ae6177f56b47a315514a5e6a3e67133f

  • results.json lines 1–68

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    experiments/dark-energy-w-watchdog/results/results.json

    c8fce738f248a1496581886dfde2bbde84e05ae3b25fa8fdf457a3bda3066f48

experiment:dark-energy-w-watchdog

double cover rh audit 2026 09 08Verdict not recorded

Original historical attempt metadata. A reported PASS is not a reviewed theorem, a fresh run or physical completion.

    experiment:double-cover-rh-audit-2026-09-08

    dsi false positive control8 real control sequences (4 aftershock cascades from USGS ComCat incl. Landers/Tohoku/Ridgecrest; 4 solar-flare sequences after large X-flares, NGDC GOES XRS), 4 clear the >= 2.8-period gate. Kernel omega=2.583 false-positive rate: frozen 0/4 (Wilson95 [0.0, 0.4899]), strict 0/4. the detector is QUIET at the kernel on every gated control (FP 0/4, Wilson95 upper 0.4899), consistent with the nominal ~5% threshold rate -> the existing TFPT-channel nulls are SPECIFIC: the kernel frequency does not fire on generic Omori/DSI-type cascades. CONTROL 1 (Efimov ladder, exactly-derived non-TFPT DSI lambda=e^(pi/s0)=22.69): measured cold-atom ratios (Cs/7Li/39K) combine to 21.331+-1.12 — Efimov-consistent (-1.22 sigma) and 8.88 sigma from the TFPT lambda=11.39 (Cs alone 7.39 sigma); the frozen detector on the gated Efimov comb fired at the kernel 0/25 seeds while detecting omega_Efimov=2.01 at 100% -> PASSED. CONTROL 2 (glass/MCT exponent spread, structural): gamma across 7 systems spans [2.2, 2.8] (std 0.2023, 4.0x the median per-system error) — the TFPT bend 2.7095 sits inside the spread but a LOCKED universal bend is rejected at chi2=43.36/7 dof (~4.87 sigma): boundary-less two-step relaxation shows no frozen bend -> PASSED. COMBINED over all 5 gated DSI controls (4 gated cascade sequences + Efimov ladder (EF.02)): kernel fired 0/5 (Wilson95 [0.0, 0.4345]). FIREWALL: controls have no TFPT mapping by construction; this calibrates detector specificity only and is NOT evidence for TFPT. No claim; nothing [E].

    Original historical attempt metadata. A reported PASS is not a reviewed theorem, a fresh run or physical completion.

    • README.md lines 1–232

      Source checked at this snapshot

      Original location and fingerprint

      experiments/dsi-false-positive-control/README.md

      ebaf131cb961c24439f7b78c1dcdb3c132e555dfe76f469bde86befb55a171e9

    • results.json lines 1–510

      Source checked at this snapshot

      Original location and fingerprint

      experiments/dsi-false-positive-control/results/results.json

      1cdcb7dc269ed2e7edbde4e1cf812f7187dacea4c2f9129be4ceab727d70bf19

    experiment:dsi-false-positive-control