A registered result in its source context
Original ledger classification: Assumption-minimal counting floor [E]/[C] (the alpha census 1/94500 = 4.40 sigma with no subjective probability; monotone concession ladder; independent of v432's subjective pieces; honest 5-sigma gap; hardens OVERDET.FLOOR.01)
Recorded statement: HARDENING THE UNCONDITIONAL FLOOR -- THE ASSUMPTION-MINIMAL COUNTING FLOOR (2026-06-29, v436): OVERDET.FLOOR.01 (v432) multiplies the counting census by SUBJECTIVE chance assignments (input-'8' independence 0.1^3, seed 0.012, kaon 0.15) a…
Statement, assumptions and sources
Paper context: Verification safeguards
The exact identifier, original classification and full claim are available below.
The source wording and classification below are preserved as recorded. A paper link, shared script or authored topic relation does not upgrade the claim or report a new proof run. Read later reviewed findings separately.
Read the exact registered claim and its dependencies
OVERDET.FLOOR.02
Original ledger classification: Assumption-minimal counting floor [E]/[C] (the alpha census 1/94500 = 4.40 sigma with no subjective probability; monotone concession ladder; independent of v432's subjective pieces; honest 5-sigma gap; hardens OVERDET.FLOOR.01)
Original claim text
HARDENING THE UNCONDITIONAL FLOOR -- THE ASSUMPTION-MINIMAL COUNTING FLOOR (2026-06-29, v436): OVERDET.FLOOR.01 (v432) multiplies the counting census by SUBJECTIVE chance assignments (input-'8' independence 0.1^3, seed 0.012, kaon 0.15) a skeptic can contest; this module shows the 'is it numerology?' verdict does NOT rest on them. [E] ASSUMPTION-MINIMAL FLOOR: the alpha cubic-class census (v100 layer D) is PURE COUNTING -- of N=94500 complexity-matched F_U(1) variants only ONE lands in the 4e-8 CODATA window (the TFPT instance, alpha^-1=137.0359992), so p_alpha <= 1/94500 = 1.06e-5 ~ 4.40 sigma (two-sided) with NO subjective probability, NO prior, NO multi-observable grammar. [E] MONOTONE CONCESSION LADDER: -log10(p) full scorecard+alpha ~30.7 -> scorecard-only ~25.8 -> alpha-census-only ~4.98 (=4.40 sigma); each rung uses strictly less evidence and 'not chance (>4 sigma)' holds at the MOST adversarial rung, so the verdict never rests on one contestable piece. [E] INDEPENDENCE: strip ALL of v432's subjective factors (1.8e-6) and the floor is still the counting census 4.40 sigma -- they only SHARPEN an already-extraordinary floor. [C] HONEST 5-SIGMA GAP: the conventional 5 sigma line (p=5.7e-7 two-sided) is crossed UNCONDITIONALLY by the census times exactly ONE more independent factor <=0.054 (the input-'8' four-fold over-determination or one foreign witness), stated not hidden. [C] FIREWALL: bounds ONLY 'is it numerology?', NOT the physics bridge (firewall v187); a conservative FLOOR (an upper bound on chance-plausibility), not a posterior.
Original classification detail
[E] the pure-counting census floor (4.40 sigma), the monotone concession ladder, and independence from v432's subjective pieces; [C] the honest 5-sigma gap (one further independent factor <=0.054) and the bounded scope (numerology only, not the physics bridge). Hardens OVERDET.FLOOR.01 (v432) -- replaces its contestable subjective assignments with an assumption-minimal counting floor; closes nothing.
Dependencies as recorded
OVERDET.FLOOR.01; v100; v305; ALPHA.QUILLEN.EXACT.01; v187
Open the original ledger source, row 101Location recorded in the ledger
These document locations are recorded directly on the ledger row. They are document level navigation, rather than a newly inferred section citation.
- Verification safeguards
Sections that explicitly cite this claim
A literal claim identifier is present in these paper sections. The section and its premises determine what the citation supports.
- Front matter / supportTFPT — Introduction and reading guide; Verification reference catalog
- 2026-06-29 ( v436 — hardening the unconditional ``is it numerology?'' floor to an assumption-minimal counting floor; plus a literature note grounding the [formula in source] Chern level)Research changelog; TFPT — Introduction and reading guide
Navigation through a shared verification script
These sections cite a script associated with the claim. This is a source navigation join, rather than an explicit citation of the claim or a theorem equivalence.
- Layer 3 — the over-determination map (multiply vs.\ compress)Verification safeguards
- Summary — the layered defenseVerification safeguards
Registered verification modules
- v436_overdet_floor2.pyRegistered verification module · registry
Read the description recorded in the module registry
OVERDET.FLOOR.02: HARDENS OVERDET.FLOOR.01 (v432) -- the 'is it numerology?' floor does NOT rest on v432's subjective chance assignments. [E] ASSUMPTION-MINIMAL FLOOR: the α cubic-class census (v100 layer D) is PURE COUNTING -- of N=94500 complexity-matched F_U(1) variants only 1 hits the 4e-8 CODATA window (the TFPT instance, α^-1=137.0359992), so p_α ≤ 1/94500 = 1.06e-5 ~ 4.40σ with NO subjective probability, prior or multi-observable grammar. [E] MONOTONE CONCESSION LADDER: -log10(p) full scorecard+α ~30.7 → scorecard-only ~25.8 → α-census-only ~4.98 (=4.40σ); the 'not chance (>4σ)' verdict holds at the MOST adversarial rung. [E] INDEPENDENCE: strip ALL of v432's subjective factors (0.1³×0.012×0.15=1.8e-6) and the floor is still 4.40σ -- they only sharpen it. [C] HONEST 5σ GAP: 5σ (p=5.7e-7) is crossed by the census times exactly ONE more independent factor ≤0.054 (the input-'8' four-fold over-determination or one foreign witness), stated openly. [C] FIREWALL: bounds numerology only, not the physics bridge (v187). Python-only (imports the v100 census live), deliberately NOT Wolfram-mirrored (a counting bound, not an identity).
A registered module is a source reference. Its presence does not assert that the module was executed in this snapshot.