Skip to main content
Guided tour · 10 steps

What TFPT claims — and how to check it

A distill-style walkthrough for curious non-specialists and skeptical physicists. Plain English first; technical depth on demand. Not a “proven TOE” pitch — an honest map of axioms, machine checks, open gates, and kill tests. Facts as of 2026-07-23.

Tip: ← / → keys move between steps · deep links look like #step-seam

01 · Two numbers

What if two numbers were enough?

Everything here starts from two axioms: c₃ = 1/(8π) and g_car = 5. No secret knobs behind the curtain.

seam constant

c₃ = 1/(8π)

carrier grade

g_car = 5

02 · The compiler

Axioms in → machine → readouts out

Think of TFPT as a discrete compiler: feed the two axioms, run the carrier algebra, audit against E₈, read off Standard-Model structure.

axiomsc₃ = 1/(8π)g_car = 5discrete compilerD₅ ⊕ A₃+ μ₄ clockaudit hullE₈readoutsSM structureα, mixings…
D5 ⊕ A3 + μ4 ⇒ E8 ⇒ SM readouts

03 · What comes out

Concrete numbers you can argue with

Among the outputs: α⁻¹, mass and mixing structure, and 27 frozen predictions — three examples below with the actual figures.

  • Fine-structure constant

    α⁻¹ = 137.0359992

    1.9σ vs CODATA — one line among many, not a fit target

  • Solar mixing angle

    sin²θ₁₂ = 0.3067

    frozen; decisive confrontation at JUNO

  • Tensor-to-scalar ratio

    r ≈ 0.004

    frozen band; CMB-S4 / next-gen B-modes

  • Plus 24 further frozen predictions in the registry — 27 total, blind-committed.

04 · Not numerology

Why this is not AI slop or curve-fitting

Predictions were frozen before decisive data; null Monte Carlos and look-elsewhere discipline are enforced; every claim carries an honest [E]/[C]/[O]/[X] grade.

  • [E]exact / machine-proven
  • [C]conditional under named hypotheses
  • [O]open / declared input
  • [X]falsifiable kill test

Empirics that returned nulls (e.g. RXTE — search target (null); NICER 0.75% / 0.93% rms — search targets, never upgraded to claims) stay search targets — never quietly promoted to theory claims.

05 · The seam

A circle, four marks, a built-in temperature

The seam is the heart of the story: a quarter-beat clock on four marks — and it carries Hawking's temperature normalisation as a measured third leg of c₃.

0123μ₄ clockT_seam = 4c₃
Four marks · quarter-beat · temperature = Hawking normalisation (third leg of c₃)

06 · Check it

You do not have to trust us

One command runs the suite. Or open the in-browser Pyodide DAG on /verification and re-derive a node yourself.

One-liner
python run_all.py

Expected terminus: ALL CHECKS PASSED (523 modules).

Open the Pyodide DAG on /verification

07 · How it dies

Committed kill tests — including one that already fired

JUNO, CMB-S4 and friends can kill published predictions. Separately, a toy-level kill (v529, straddle law) already fired — and we published it.

Toy kill · banked

v529 · straddle law

The first interacting toy model fails a preregistered kill test (straddle law). Banked openly — anti-numerology style. Status: published, not buried.

Full kill board & freeze criteria

08 · Still open

What we do not pretend to have closed

SEAM.EQUIV stays [O] unconditionally. One input bit survives ten failed derivations — that failure is the point. The interacting seam is still open.

  • SEAM.EQUIV[O]

    Unconditional seam equivalence remains open; ledger is source of truth.

  • the one input bit[O]

    10side-blind derivation attempts failed — that's the point. Now defined as the twist-class choice, in principle interferometrically readable. It remains an input.

  • Woit bridge: α / β₁ / β₂ executed at the free level; the interacting seam stays open.

09 · Two bridges

Celestial measure chain · Woit free bridge

Two research bridges toward physics: a thirty-step celestial/twistor story with a derived measure chain, and a Woit OS route with α→β₂ executed (interacting still open).

Celestial / twistor route

30 steps

thirty-step story; measure chain derived. Measure chain: derived at probe level.

Progress cue only — not a ledger upgrade.

The OS twistor bridge — WOIT.OS.TWISTOR.01

research contract · [O]

The actual bridge from compiler to physics: a global real structure Θ plus interacting reflection positivity plus OS reconstruction on the twistorial algebra. Three of its preregistered stages are executed; the contract itself stays open.

αv519

Θ exists at the free level; free RP selects the same family

β₁v522

the μ₄ clock is the euclidean rotation; gaugeable datum = the GSO ℤ₂; gauge-fixed RP holds

β₂v524

OS quotient explicit: H_phys positive definite, the clock a positive transfer operator with spectral calculus

β₃open

next — under the straddle-law constraint

Toy-level kill, honestly banked (v529). On the first genuinely interacting seam toy, Kill-Test 2 fires: reflection positivity breaks for every g > 0 following the straddle law (RP fails exactly on quartet-straddled cuts, 24/24). Fenced — one toy, one interaction class — this is a named threat and the first hard selection principle: every candidate A_hol must pass the straddle filter. No marker moves; the contract stays [O].

10 · Join in

Reproduce, review, falsify

Zero external replications yet. The invitation is concrete: clone the repo, run the suite, file a kill, or write a review.

Step 1 of 10