Resonance uniqueness
v116_resonance_uniqueness.py · registry
Read the original description and evidence links
RESONANCE THEOREM (the v115 [N] findings promoted to [I] by a LINEAR computation — the anticipated Gröbner step was unnecessary): TWISTED-AVERAGE LEMMA [I] — at infinity the equivariant system reads dY/dw = −(1/w)(B₀ + B₁w + …)Y with B_m = Σₖ i^{km} Uᵏ A₀ U⁻ᵏ; the twisted μ₄ averages collapse to B₀ = 4 diag(A₀) and B₁ = 4a₁₂E₁₂ + 4ā₁₃E₃₁ (only the eigenvalue-ratio −i cells survive); RESONANCE THEOREM [I]: the anchor exponents diag(2,1,1) have resonance gap 1, the level-1 gauge equation is singular exactly on cells {(2,1),(3,1)} where B₁ = (0, 4ā₁₃), higher levels non-resonant, formal monodromy = 1 ⇒ M∞ = 1 ⟺ a₁₃ = 0 — the transcendental Riemann–Hilbert condition collapses to ONE linear equation; UNIQUENESS COROLLARY [I]: a₁₃ = 0 + the (8,0,5)/144 moduli + diagonal gauge ⇒ THE FLAT ANCHOR LOCUS IS EXACTLY ONE GAUGE ORBIT = the exact A₀* — within the μ₄-equivariant anchor class the U_wall bundle datum is ALGEBRAICALLY unique; FALSIFICATION CONTROL [N]: ‖M∞ − 1‖ ≈ 8.5|a₁₃| (sharp), 1.6e−10 at A₀*; honest scope: residue side [I], holonomy values (harmonic diagonal) remain [N]
Read the original Python source- Linked claims