Overdet floor2
v436_overdet_floor2.py · registry
Read the original description and evidence links
OVERDET.FLOOR.02: HARDENS OVERDET.FLOOR.01 (v432) -- the 'is it numerology?' floor does NOT rest on v432's subjective chance assignments. [E] ASSUMPTION-MINIMAL FLOOR: the α cubic-class census (v100 layer D) is PURE COUNTING -- of N=94500 complexity-matched F_U(1) variants only 1 hits the 4e-8 CODATA window (the TFPT instance, α^-1=137.0359992), so p_α ≤ 1/94500 = 1.06e-5 ~ 4.40σ with NO subjective probability, prior or multi-observable grammar. [E] MONOTONE CONCESSION LADDER: -log10(p) full scorecard+α ~30.7 → scorecard-only ~25.8 → α-census-only ~4.98 (=4.40σ); the 'not chance (>4σ)' verdict holds at the MOST adversarial rung. [E] INDEPENDENCE: strip ALL of v432's subjective factors (0.1³×0.012×0.15=1.8e-6) and the floor is still 4.40σ -- they only sharpen it. [C] HONEST 5σ GAP: 5σ (p=5.7e-7) is crossed by the census times exactly ONE more independent factor ≤0.054 (the input-'8' four-fold over-determination or one foreign witness), stated openly. [C] FIREWALL: bounds numerology only, not the physics bridge (v187). Python-only (imports the v100 census live), deliberately NOT Wolfram-mirrored (a counting bound, not an identity).
Read the original Python source- Linked claims