Skip to main content
Back to the connections

Follow a result back to its evidence.

Choose a result, inspect its assumptions, then run the calculation that supports it. Each check answers a specific question. The original status and the scope of that answer stay attached.

Start with the E₈ construction.

The first module builds the lattice explicitly. It checks the glue, constructs its 240 roots and tests the lattice basis. You can read the source before running it.

Question
Does the explicit construction give the even, unimodular E₈ lattice?
What is tested
Shared ℤ₄ discriminant data; glue norms 5/4 + 3/4 = 2; 240 roots of squared length 2; an integral, even basis with determinant 1.
Read the Python source

Python runs in your browser using Pyodide. The first run downloads the runtime. Its output appears in the existing verification viewer, including any failure and the local reproduction command.

This is a mathematical lattice check. Identifying that lattice with a physical system requires additional arguments and retains its own status.

Find the source behind a check.

Search all 707 registered Python modules by subject, filename, claim or source section. This catalogue records source presence and links. It does not report a new execution or a passing result for every module.

1 matching module · showing 1–1

Clear filters

Celestial wp5b singular vector

v498_celestial_wp5b_singular_vector.py · frontier

Read the original description and evidence links

CELEST.WP5B.01: WP5b of the celestial-holographic research contract CELEST.SEAM.01 -- 'the singular vector as an operator', the second constructive milestone of WP5 (WP5a fixed the ideal's size and location; WP5b constructs the deleting object). [E] CONSTRUCTION: |s> = (E^theta_{-1})^2|0>, theta the highest root, weight 2 theta (top of the 27000), level 2 = 8 quarters = q^2 (INTEGER); Chevalley/Frenkel-Kac basis MACHINE-built (bimultiplicative 2-cocycle, asymmetry on all 57600 pairs; [e_a,e_{-a}] sign FORCED by Jacobi, SGN = -1; kappa derived, kappa(theta_vee,theta_vee) = 2; Jacobi exact on 57600 sl2-slice triples + 6000 seeded + all 496 theta-adjacent; all N_ab = +-1). [E] SINGULARITY: J^a_1|s> = 0 for ALL 248 basis elements, 0 violations; case tally 190 (first bracket) / 57 (second) / 1 (F^theta via central-term cancellation -- the ONLY case that sees k); plus J^a_2|s> = 0 (248), E^a_0|s> = 0 (120), Shapovalov norm 0 at k = 1 (4 at k = 2); affine PBW engine unit-tested on all 61504 basis pairs. [E] LEVEL DIAL: F^theta_1 coefficient = 2(1-k) -- 2 at k = 0, 0 EXACTLY at k = 1, -2 at k = 2: without the central extension the deletion object does not exist. [E] MU4 DATA: theta-grading dims (1,56,134,56,1), g0 = e7+u(1); h-adapted chamber machine-built (Cartan det 1, E8 Dynkin diagram, branch lengths [1,2,4]); <theta,h> = 5 => j(theta) = 1, height 29 = h_vee-1; |s> in class 2 (sheet-even, WP5a consistent); clock phase i^2 = -1; cross-table theta-grading x glue class consistent (rows (1,56,126,56,1), columns (52,64,60,64)); the deleting theta-sl2 sheet-odd (1,3), its square sheet-even. [E] LEVEL-2 MATCH: Mult(2 theta) = 1 in the level-2 Fock => U(g)|s> is THE 27000; direct g0-orbit BFS reproduces the Freudenthal multiplicities of V(2 theta) exactly through depth 4; quotient 31124 - 27000 = 4124; lattice reading (2theta,2theta)/2 = 4 > 2 => no 2theta state at q^2 in E4/eta^8 -- |s> IS the kernel generator of Fock -> E4/eta^8. [E] NEGATIVE CONTROLS: E^theta_{-1}|0> NOT singular (1 witness F^theta, -> -k|0>) -- the 248-current state that must remain; 4 generic level-2 states non-singular (14-33 witnesses); k-dial: at k = 2 only the CUBE is singular ((E^theta)^{k+1} mechanics = generic Kac); D8/SO(16)_1: the singular vector exists there TOO (level-1 generic) but the h = 1/2 blocks do not fuse (3 comark-1 weights, dim V(2 theta_D8) = 5304 != 14^3) vs E8 (comarks >= 2, vacuum the only level-1 primary, glue weights (0,1,1,1) integer) -- one-block closure is the E8/mu4-specific part, honestly separated. [C] Weyl complete reducibility beyond BFS depth 4; Kac mechanics beyond level 2; per-period quarter dictionary (v496). [O] HONEST LIMIT: in the twisted quarter-slot moding two C_1 modes never sum to 8 quarters (minimum 6 = q^{3/2}) -- the per-PERIOD dictionary (v496), not the per-slot identification, carries |s> to q^2; exactly the precise WP5c question (GNS limit state, kernel containing the ideal); WP5c/d/e stay [O]; SEAM.EQUIV.01 untouched. Exact (integer/Fraction).

Read the original Python source
Linked claims

Different evidence answers different questions.

A numerical calculation, a formal theorem and an experimental comparison carry different kinds of information. Follow the source appropriate to the claim.

Python calculations
Inspect the algorithm, its inputs and its negative controls. Run a browser compatible module here, or use the repository for the complete environment.Browse Python sources
Formal mathematics
Read the actual Lean statement and its assumptions. The carrier formalization has a defined mathematical scope.Inspect the Lean formalization
Independent implementation
The Wolfram implementation checks algebraic results through a separate computational path. The recorded runs report 116/116 base checks and 603/603 extension checks. This is distinct from external experimental replication.Read the Wolfram implementation
Physical comparison
Read each prediction with its freeze, conditions and failure criterion. A passing mathematical check does not decide the experimental comparison.Open the prediction register

Run the same check on your machine.

From a checkout of the repository, install its Python requirements and run the first lattice module. The complete suite is a separate step.

Set up the repository

git clone https://github.com/sthamann/tfpt.git
cd tfpt
python3 -m venv .venv
.venv/bin/pip install -r requirements.txt

Check the E₈ lattice

.venv/bin/python verification/v1_e8_glue.py

Read the individual checks and the final pass or fail result.

Run the registered suite

cd verification
../.venv/bin/python run_all.py

The full suite uses the dependencies and source context documented in the repository.

Repository setup and maintenance instructions

Read the current claim beside its source.

The research snapshot dated 2026-11-02 includes the active ledger, reviewed findings and registered scripts. It records source coverage and stated scope; it is not a new execution of every proof or calculation.

Trace the dependencies.

Select a node to inspect its inputs, outputs, scope and verification scripts. Browser compatible checks open the same verification viewer; native certificates provide their local command.

Explore the complete dependency graph

Keep the detailed research in reach.

The script index, figures and detailed research interfaces remain available below. This older technical overview preserves its original statements; use the current result inventory to follow later scope corrections.

Open the script index, figures and research details