Skip to main content
Back to the connections

Follow a result back to its evidence.

Choose a result, inspect its assumptions, then run the calculation that supports it. Each check answers a specific question. The original status and the scope of that answer stay attached.

Start with the E₈ construction.

The first module builds the lattice explicitly. It checks the glue, constructs its 240 roots and tests the lattice basis. You can read the source before running it.

Question
Does the explicit construction give the even, unimodular E₈ lattice?
What is tested
Shared ℤ₄ discriminant data; glue norms 5/4 + 3/4 = 2; 240 roots of squared length 2; an integral, even basis with determinant 1.
Read the Python source

Python runs in your browser using Pyodide. The first run downloads the runtime. Its output appears in the existing verification viewer, including any failure and the local reproduction command.

This is a mathematical lattice check. Identifying that lattice with a physical system requires additional arguments and retains its own status.

Find the source behind a check.

Search all 707 registered Python modules by subject, filename, claim or source section. This catalogue records source presence and links. It does not report a new execution or a passing result for every module.

1 matching module · showing 1–1

Clear filters

Celestial wp5e eps2 level from flux

v509_celestial_wp5e_eps2_level_from_flux.py · frontier

Read the original description and evidence links

CELEST.WP5E.EPS2.01: WP5e-epsilon-2 of the celestial-holographic research contract CELEST.SEAM.01 -- 'the CPS level-from-flux dial', executed (verdict B): derive the boundary level k = 1 from flux quantisation on the lockstep spheres, following the Costello-Paquette-Sharma (CPS) Burns-holography mechanism (PRL 130, 061602; arXiv:2306.00940). Exact sympy/Fraction, no floats (28 checks, <1 s). [E] CPS SKELETON REPLICATED EXACTLY: the S^3 period of the brane backreaction 3-form int Omega_N = (2 pi i)^2 N (pullback density -sin(2 theta), phases cancel; their eq. 3.33); the exceptional-sphere Kahler flux int_{P^1} omega = 2 pi N (K = |u|^2 + N log|u|^2, flat part dies at t -> 0); boundary level magnitude 2N via the symplectic-boson double contraction (N = 1, 2, 3), normalisation Dynkin index T(so8 vector) = 1 -- the CPS formula 'level = flux quantum x Dynkin index of the boundary matter', level LINEAR in the flux. [E] PAIRING MATRIX PINNED, NOT POSTULATED: the v505 ch2 ledger (f(m) = -(C^-1)_mm/2 = (-3/8, -1/2, -3/8)) + integrality + unimodularity + effectivity pin P_mi = c1(T_m).[Sigma_i] = delta_mi by COMPLETE enumeration (row candidates 8/6/8; 48 unimodular solutions of P C^-1 P^T = C^-1; with P >= 0 exactly 2 = identity + A3 diagram flip); full c1 matrix -(C^-1)_mn; glue FLUXES F_i = (64, 60, 64) = dim g_i, total 188 = 248 - 60, flip-invariant; flux per charged root current uniformly ONE quantum through exactly one sphere. [E] LEVEL FORMULA, honest: 'level = total open-string flux' is KILLED by the lockstep test itself (k_i = (64, 60, 64) unequal -- F_i is the FLAVOUR multiplicity); what works: k = flux per adjoint current = F_i/dim g_i = (1, 1, 1), anchored non-circularly by the lattice current count (240, 0, 0, 0) for k = 1..4 (v505 S4.8) and the embedding index j(D5 in E8) = j(A3 in E8) = 1 (Killing coefficient 60 = 2 h_vee(E8)). ORD-4-VS-LEVEL-1 RESOLVED: the clock order counts FRACTIONAL flux sectors, not the level -- mu = det(D5) det(A3) = 16 = ord(monodromy)^2, the mu4 glue diagonal isotropic + Lagrangian (order 4 = sqrt 16), KLM condensation 16 -> 16/4^2 = 1 = zero residual fractional flux; NEW DIAL: #primaries((E8)_k) = (1, 3, 5, 10, 15, 27) for k = 1..6 from the affine marks -- exactly ONE sector iff k = 1 (independent of the CPS transplantation). [E] LOCKSTEP THEOREM (the lifting of v505 S4.10 'one scale => one level' to a THEOREM): clock invariance P(iZ) = P(Z) forces a3 = a2 = a1 = 0, the four branch points are ONE mu4 orbit, |Pi_j| = sqrt(2) t EQUAL on all three spheres, monodromy = pure phase i, det(A - 1) = -4 => no invariant flux vector => k1 = k2 = k3 IS A THEOREM of clock invariance; NEGATIVE PROBE (new falsifier): the clock-forbidden family Z^4 - Z (smooth, disc -27, branch points {0, 1, w, w^2} not a mu4 orbit): over ALL 24 orderings ZERO chains with three equal period moduli (1 vs sqrt 3); HONEST LIMIT: uniform flux doubling keeps the lockstep -- the theorem proves EQUALITY, not the value; the value 1 comes from the current/sector counters and the CPS minimal quantum N = 1. [E] NEGATIVE CONTROLS: k = 2 (current count 0, embedding residual 360, prefactor -31/48 != -1/3, #primaries 3 != 1 -- while the lockstep dial honestly does NOT fire); SO(16) glue (fluxes (0, 60, 0): spheres 1/3 FLUX-DARK, ch2 defect -30 != -78, condensation stops at 16/2^2 = 4 = det Cartan(D8)); A2 intersection form (det 3 != 4, glue diagonal 23/24 not integer, mu = 12 not a perfect square: NO Lagrangian subgroup, Dedekind 2/3 != 5/4, Coxeter 3 != 4). [C] the CPS dictionary itself on PT/Z4 (their geometry is the C^2 blow-up with ONE (-1)-sphere and so(8) at negative level -- not the A3 ALE). [O] the type-I B-model backreaction on PT/Z4 (twisted Kodaira-Spencer measure, the A3 Omega_N) -- the same fence as v502 S5.7/v505; delta-1/delta-2 and epsilon-1 stay open; SEAM.EQUIV.01 untouched; no marker moves. Exact (sympy/Fraction).

Read the original Python source
Linked claims

Different evidence answers different questions.

A numerical calculation, a formal theorem and an experimental comparison carry different kinds of information. Follow the source appropriate to the claim.

Python calculations
Inspect the algorithm, its inputs and its negative controls. Run a browser compatible module here, or use the repository for the complete environment.Browse Python sources
Formal mathematics
Read the actual Lean statement and its assumptions. The carrier formalization has a defined mathematical scope.Inspect the Lean formalization
Independent implementation
The Wolfram implementation checks algebraic results through a separate computational path. The recorded runs report 116/116 base checks and 603/603 extension checks. This is distinct from external experimental replication.Read the Wolfram implementation
Physical comparison
Read each prediction with its freeze, conditions and failure criterion. A passing mathematical check does not decide the experimental comparison.Open the prediction register

Run the same check on your machine.

From a checkout of the repository, install its Python requirements and run the first lattice module. The complete suite is a separate step.

Set up the repository

git clone https://github.com/sthamann/tfpt.git
cd tfpt
python3 -m venv .venv
.venv/bin/pip install -r requirements.txt

Check the E₈ lattice

.venv/bin/python verification/v1_e8_glue.py

Read the individual checks and the final pass or fail result.

Run the registered suite

cd verification
../.venv/bin/python run_all.py

The full suite uses the dependencies and source context documented in the repository.

Repository setup and maintenance instructions

Read the current claim beside its source.

The research snapshot dated 2026-11-02 includes the active ledger, reviewed findings and registered scripts. It records source coverage and stated scope; it is not a new execution of every proof or calculation.

Trace the dependencies.

Select a node to inspect its inputs, outputs, scope and verification scripts. Browser compatible checks open the same verification viewer; native certificates provide their local command.

Explore the complete dependency graph

Keep the detailed research in reach.

The script index, figures and detailed research interfaces remain available below. This older technical overview preserves its original statements; use the current result inventory to follow later scope corrections.

Open the script index, figures and research details