Skip to main content
Back to the connections

Follow a result back to its evidence.

Choose a result, inspect its assumptions, then run the calculation that supports it. Each check answers a specific question. The original status and the scope of that answer stay attached.

Start with the E₈ construction.

The first module builds the lattice explicitly. It checks the glue, constructs its 240 roots and tests the lattice basis. You can read the source before running it.

Question
Does the explicit construction give the even, unimodular E₈ lattice?
What is tested
Shared ℤ₄ discriminant data; glue norms 5/4 + 3/4 = 2; 240 roots of squared length 2; an integral, even basis with determinant 1.
Read the Python source

Python runs in your browser using Pyodide. The first run downloads the runtime. Its output appears in the existing verification viewer, including any failure and the local reproduction command.

This is a mathematical lattice check. Identifying that lattice with a physical system requires additional arguments and retains its own status.

Find the source behind a check.

Search all 707 registered Python modules by subject, filename, claim or source section. This catalogue records source presence and links. It does not report a new execution or a passing result for every module.

1 matching module · showing 1–1

Clear filters

Celestial wp5e delta2 tensor ledger

v511_celestial_wp5e_delta2_tensor_ledger.py · frontier

Read the original description and evidence links

CELEST.WP5E.DELTA2.01: WP5e-delta-2 of the celestial-holographic research contract CELEST.SEAM.01 -- 'the full-tensor ledger', the named escape route of the v508 exchange no-go, executed (intermediate verdict, exact): does the FULL adjoint tensor structure of e8 (non-Cartan external legs, higher-arity vertices) open a sphere-axion channel to the rigid 32 T3 residual of the Atiyah-Bott ledger (A_fix = (9, -30, -15, 0, 32) in (P1, P2, P3, T5, T3), v505 S3.7)? The collapse is CONFIRMED full-tensorially, but one cubic door opens. Exact integer-scaled weight multisets + Kostant/Weyl alternating sums + sympy/Fraction, no floats (41 checks, ~4 s). [E] STRUCTURE: g0 = d5 (+) a3 is SEMISIMPLE with NO u(1) factor (the 52 class-0 roots split 40 + 12 into pure D5 + pure A3 roots, root span rank 8 = rank E8); the twisted sectors factorise multiplicity-free into minuscule Weyl orbits g1 = (16_s, 4), g2 = (10, 6), g3 = (16_c, 4bar) = (g1)^*, each an irreducible g0-module (64, 60, 64); INNERNESS THEOREM: h = (2,2,2,2,2;0^4) lies in the CARTAN OF g0, so every g0-invariant tensor automatically carries total sector charge 0 mod 4 -- the v508 collapse is a full-tensor statement AND holds across arities (all 15 non-neutral sector triples: Hom = 0). [E] HOM TABLES: bilinear dim Hom_{g0}(g_j x g_j') nonzero ONLY at j' = -j (dims 2/1/1/1, Killing blocks); trilinear neutral multisets {0,0,0}: 3 (= 1 sym + 2 antisym), {0,1,3}: 2, {0,2,2}: 2, {1,1,2}: 1, {2,3,3}: 1 -- ALL cross-sector trilinears are pure brackets (antisymmetric in the repeated legs); the ONLY totally symmetric survivor on all of e8 is the su(4) d-symbol (so(10) has no cubic Casimir: Inv(S^3 45) = 0 protects T5). [E] THE NEW CHANNEL: the quartic projection of the d-symbol exchange is Q_dd = (0, 0, -1/240, 0, 1/60) = (1/60)(T3 - P3/4), computed by TWO independent routes (Killing-propagator contraction, 2 h_vee = 60 verified from the roots; hand route |x^2 - (tr x^2/4) 1|^2/60); Phi_T3(Q_dd) = 1/60 != 0 -- v508's master-kill functional does NOT annihilate the trilinear exchange (the product theorem covers quadratic vertices only); brackets, tadpoles and mixed d x f die exactly; no T5 analogue. [E] NEW CERTIFICATE: M = [E13, E22, E00, Q_dd] has rank 3, augmented rank 4 -- the pairing in the charge reading remains OBSTRUCTED, but with the WEAKER certificate {Phi_T5, psi = Phi_P - Phi_T3/4}, psi(A_fix) = 72 - 8 = 64; the RELAXED reading becomes EXACTLY solvable: A_fix = -u + 8v + 2w + 1920 Q_dd (residual 0) -- where v508 found T5 = T3 = 0 persisting even relaxed, the d-channel closes the T3 gap with small integer coefficients. [C] number fences: 64 = dim g1 = 2^6; 1920 = |W(D5)| = 2^7 x 3 x 5 = 8 x 240. [O] the arity >= 4 ledger; the physical justification of the cubic GS term (c_d = 1920 under the e8-Killing propagator); ch2-naturalness for CUBIC vertices UNDECIDED (no canonical geometric datum for a cubic vertex); the burden on delta-1 (twisted BCOV contact terms) is SHARPENED: it must supply either the psi = 64 slice or the selection-rule relaxation. [E] NEGATIVE CONTROLS: (a) Killing control = v508 replication (A_fix, E13 = (16, -96, 144, 0, 0), E22 = (16, 32, 16, 0, 0), E00 = 225 E22); (b) SO(16)/D8: bilinears (1, 0, 1), trilinears (1, 0, 1, 0), Inv(S^3 adj_d8) = 0 -- no symmetric cubic, no odd sectors, no A3 block: the delta-2 channel cannot even be posed (E8/mu4 doubly special); (c) false g0 = d5+a2+u(1): (5, 2, 2) != (2, 1, 1) and Inv(S^3 g0) = 6 != 1; false sector content (16_s, 4bar) kills every pairing. SEAM.EQUIV.01 stays [O]; NO marker moves. Exact (sympy/Fraction).

Read the original Python source

Different evidence answers different questions.

A numerical calculation, a formal theorem and an experimental comparison carry different kinds of information. Follow the source appropriate to the claim.

Python calculations
Inspect the algorithm, its inputs and its negative controls. Run a browser compatible module here, or use the repository for the complete environment.Browse Python sources
Formal mathematics
Read the actual Lean statement and its assumptions. The carrier formalization has a defined mathematical scope.Inspect the Lean formalization
Independent implementation
The Wolfram implementation checks algebraic results through a separate computational path. The recorded runs report 116/116 base checks and 603/603 extension checks. This is distinct from external experimental replication.Read the Wolfram implementation
Physical comparison
Read each prediction with its freeze, conditions and failure criterion. A passing mathematical check does not decide the experimental comparison.Open the prediction register

Run the same check on your machine.

From a checkout of the repository, install its Python requirements and run the first lattice module. The complete suite is a separate step.

Set up the repository

git clone https://github.com/sthamann/tfpt.git
cd tfpt
python3 -m venv .venv
.venv/bin/pip install -r requirements.txt

Check the E₈ lattice

.venv/bin/python verification/v1_e8_glue.py

Read the individual checks and the final pass or fail result.

Run the registered suite

cd verification
../.venv/bin/python run_all.py

The full suite uses the dependencies and source context documented in the repository.

Repository setup and maintenance instructions

Read the current claim beside its source.

The research snapshot dated 2026-11-02 includes the active ledger, reviewed findings and registered scripts. It records source coverage and stated scope; it is not a new execution of every proof or calculation.

Trace the dependencies.

Select a node to inspect its inputs, outputs, scope and verification scripts. Browser compatible checks open the same verification viewer; native certificates provide their local command.

Explore the complete dependency graph

Keep the detailed research in reach.

The script index, figures and detailed research interfaces remain available below. This older technical overview preserves its original statements; use the current result inventory to follow later scope corrections.

Open the script index, figures and research details