Skip to main content
Back to the connections

Follow a result back to its evidence.

Choose a result, inspect its assumptions, then run the calculation that supports it. Each check answers a specific question. The original status and the scope of that answer stay attached.

Start with the E₈ construction.

The first module builds the lattice explicitly. It checks the glue, constructs its 240 roots and tests the lattice basis. You can read the source before running it.

Question
Does the explicit construction give the even, unimodular E₈ lattice?
What is tested
Shared ℤ₄ discriminant data; glue norms 5/4 + 3/4 = 2; 240 roots of squared length 2; an integral, even basis with determinant 1.
Read the Python source

Python runs in your browser using Pyodide. The first run downloads the runtime. Its output appears in the existing verification viewer, including any failure and the local reproduction command.

This is a mathematical lattice check. Identifying that lattice with a physical system requires additional arguments and retains its own status.

Find the source behind a check.

Search all 707 registered Python modules by subject, filename, claim or source section. This catalogue records source presence and links. It does not report a new execution or a passing result for every module.

1 matching module · showing 1–1

Clear filters

Seam tau flag

v512_seam_tau_flag.py · core

Read the original description and evidence links

SEAM.TAU.FLAG.01: the flag-transitivity equivalence web -- the tau = i attack executed on the free RP seam circle: which ESTABLISHED seam datum excludes the free-but-non-harmonic configurations? (Test family M(delta) = {+-1, +-e^(i delta)}, delta in (0, pi/2]; NO marker moves -- the bit stays [C], QGEO.REALIZE.01 and P2.TYPING.01/AX.P2.01 text-precised only.) Exact sympy + mpmath 30 digits. [E] FALSIFICATION OF BARE TRANSITIVITY: on the free RP circle V4 = {z, -z, b/z, -b/z} acts SIMPLY TRANSITIVELY on the four marks for EVERY delta (pair-exchanging inversions; complete census: deck-commuting Moebius maps = diagonal/antidiagonal) -- the expectation 'transitivity <= v216 local equality selects tau = i' is refuted; hardening: ALL undirected per-mark data (arc-pair multiset, distance multiset, cone germ) are identical for every delta -- no local jet sees the bit. [E] THE SHARP SELECTOR: FLAG transitivity (marks AND sides) <=> delta = pi/2 <=> tau = i <=> the clock -- stabiliser jump 1 -> 2, flag/arc orbits 2 -> 1, order-4 rotation (b^2 = -1 solveset {pi/2}), mark mirror z -> 1/z <=> cos delta = 0. [E] 12-FOLD EQUIVALENCE WEB (each link exact): clock rotation, D4, mark mirror, flag transitivity, three spectral degeneracies (odd-doublet split = (2/pi) ln cot(delta/2), zero only at pi/2 -- counterwitness exactly (2/pi) ln 2; arc-Laplacian degeneracy 4/pi; the v215-K3 indicator in closed form (2 sqrt 2/pi)|ln tan(delta/2)| -- the v503 lattice curve analytically), rho-twist existence ((m^2 - n^2)(t - 1/t) = 0 <=> t = 1; Atiyah-Bott rationality is delta-BLIND -- Tr(sigma e^(t Delta)) = 1 for all delta, j_cw = 148176/25 rational non-CM: rationality does NOT select), 4-cycle implementability (H4 rigidity: V4 with orders {1,2,2,2} cannot induce the cusp 4-cycle; centraliser scalar, U^2 nonscalar => no projective involution -- projective order exactly 4, Z8-shadow consistent v510), harmonic, j = 1728. [E] NEGATIVE CONTROLS: hexagonal (not concyclic, fails the preconditions); silver (harmonic but topologically dead -- position/modulus halves independent, consistent v510); 3 marks (impossible on the free circle: 0 invariant 3-subsets vs 28 invariant 4-subsets; bare n = 3 transitivity already forces equal spacing -- '4 counts': the deck-pairing makes bare transitivity free of charge). [C] THE REST (verbatim): the last input reduces from a continuous modulus to ONE discrete symmetry-lift bit (V4 -> D4: side-indistinguishability of the four equally-decorated marks); v216 local equality does NOT deliver it (no local jet can see the side bit); its negation is now concretely measurable (odd-split (2/pi) ln cot(delta/2) != 0). Scoreboard: the counterwitness passes all 7 established unsided tests, fails all 9 clock-equivalent ones. Exact (sympy + mpmath).

Read the original Python source
Linked claims

Different evidence answers different questions.

A numerical calculation, a formal theorem and an experimental comparison carry different kinds of information. Follow the source appropriate to the claim.

Python calculations
Inspect the algorithm, its inputs and its negative controls. Run a browser compatible module here, or use the repository for the complete environment.Browse Python sources
Formal mathematics
Read the actual Lean statement and its assumptions. The carrier formalization has a defined mathematical scope.Inspect the Lean formalization
Independent implementation
The Wolfram implementation checks algebraic results through a separate computational path. The recorded runs report 116/116 base checks and 603/603 extension checks. This is distinct from external experimental replication.Read the Wolfram implementation
Physical comparison
Read each prediction with its freeze, conditions and failure criterion. A passing mathematical check does not decide the experimental comparison.Open the prediction register

Run the same check on your machine.

From a checkout of the repository, install its Python requirements and run the first lattice module. The complete suite is a separate step.

Set up the repository

git clone https://github.com/sthamann/tfpt.git
cd tfpt
python3 -m venv .venv
.venv/bin/pip install -r requirements.txt

Check the E₈ lattice

.venv/bin/python verification/v1_e8_glue.py

Read the individual checks and the final pass or fail result.

Run the registered suite

cd verification
../.venv/bin/python run_all.py

The full suite uses the dependencies and source context documented in the repository.

Repository setup and maintenance instructions

Read the current claim beside its source.

The research snapshot dated 2026-11-02 includes the active ledger, reviewed findings and registered scripts. It records source coverage and stated scope; it is not a new execution of every proof or calculation.

Trace the dependencies.

Select a node to inspect its inputs, outputs, scope and verification scripts. Browser compatible checks open the same verification viewer; native certificates provide their local command.

Explore the complete dependency graph

Keep the detailed research in reach.

The script index, figures and detailed research interfaces remain available below. This older technical overview preserves its original statements; use the current result inventory to follow later scope corrections.

Open the script index, figures and research details