Skip to main content
Back to the connections

Follow a result back to its evidence.

Choose a result, inspect its assumptions, then run the calculation that supports it. Each check answers a specific question. The original status and the scope of that answer stay attached.

Start with the E₈ construction.

The first module builds the lattice explicitly. It checks the glue, constructs its 240 roots and tests the lattice basis. You can read the source before running it.

Question
Does the explicit construction give the even, unimodular E₈ lattice?
What is tested
Shared ℤ₄ discriminant data; glue norms 5/4 + 3/4 = 2; 240 roots of squared length 2; an integral, even basis with determinant 1.
Read the Python source

Python runs in your browser using Pyodide. The first run downloads the runtime. Its output appears in the existing verification viewer, including any failure and the local reproduction command.

This is a mathematical lattice check. Identifying that lattice with a physical system requires additional arguments and retains its own status.

Find the source behind a check.

Search all 707 registered Python modules by subject, filename, claim or source section. This catalogue records source presence and links. It does not report a new execution or a passing result for every module.

1 matching module · showing 1–1

Clear filters

Celestial wp5e eps1 axion slot

v514_celestial_wp5e_eps1_axion_slot.py · frontier

Read the original description and evidence links

CELEST.WP5E.EPS1.01: WP5e-epsilon-1 of the celestial-holographic research contract CELEST.SEAM.01 -- 'the O(-2) bulk-axion slot', executed (verdict B): build the s = 0 tower field explicitly, pin lambda~ = 6 as a residue with explicit factor bookkeeping on PT/Z4, and take the first honest back-reaction step (Gibbons-Hawking A3). Exact sympy/Fraction, no floats (34 checks, ~4 s). [E] EQUIVARIANT O(-2) SLOT: pushforward ledger pi_* O(-2) on PT' = tot(O(1)+O(1) -> P^1): per spacetime degree d exactly (d+1)^2 = nullspaces of the wave operator (1, 4, 9, 16, 25, 36 for d = 0..5); the v492 action on the fibre coordinates (mu1, mu2) -> (i mu1, i^-1 mu2), incidence forces column weights (+1, +1, -1, -1); the equivariant bookkeeping closes BLOCK BY BLOCK (all d <= 6, all 4 characters); character series P_0 = 1 + 3t^2 + 15t^4 + 21t^6 + 45t^8 + ..., P_1 = P_3 = 2t + 8t^3 + 18t^5 + ..., P_2 = 6t^2 + 10t^4 + 28t^6 + ...; the d = 0 slot has multiplicity (1, 0, 0, 0) -- THE BULK AXION SURVIVES THE PROJECTION; Molien invariant ring = (1 - t^8)/((1 - t^4)^2 (1 - t^2)) -- Z in O(2), X, Y in O(4), relation degree 8 = the a0 weight (v492/v493 bridge); E3 bijection sharpened: twisted characters {i, -1, -i} with minimal content (2t, 6t^2, 2t) and NO degree-0 mode = the Coxeter eigenvalues on H^2(ALE), det(A-1) = -4; graviton control: the O(+2) slot starts invariant only at fibre degree 4 with multiplicity 3 = {X, Z^2, Y} (the cohomological form of v505 X = -2 != +2 = Y). [E] LAMBDA~ = 6 TRIPLY PINNED: (1) Okubo: Tr_adj X^4 = 36<x,x>^2 = (6<x,x>)^2 on the 240 glue roots, 36 = h_vee + 6, lambda~ = 6 = |Z2| N_fam; (2) measure cancellation: mu = 1/4 enters three times (vertex^2 mu^2, propagator 1/mu, anomaly mu) and cancels EXACTLY -- lambda~_eff^2 = 36 for ARBITRARY mu; wrong bookings quantified and excluded: anomaly-only => lambda~ = 3, missing propagator renormalisation => lambda~ = 12; (3) flux: minimal CPS quantum N = 1, a single exchange channel exactly at k = 1 (#primaries), (kappa/c3)^2 = 36/3 = 12 exact. [E] GH/A3 BACK-REACTION STEP: invariant 4-centre configurations = exactly 2 branches (axis^4 or ONE free mu4 orbit); free orbit => prod(Z - i^p z0) = Z^4 - z0^4 => XY = Z^4 + a0 with a0 = -z0^4 (the v493 family RE-DERIVED from the geometry); monodromy a0 -> e^{2 pi i} a0 = one clock step; the GH point of charge k is EXACTLY R^4/Z_k (k = 4 => seam boundary S^3/Z4); periods int omega = 4 pi (x_q - x_p), free orbit: Pi_j = 4 pi t0 (i-1)(1, i, i^2), |Pi_j| equal (LOCKSTEP, counter-check of v509); the Coxeter clock FROM THE GEOMETRY (A^4 = 1, det(A-1) = -4, Pi.A = i Pi); the CPS 'N log' analogue = source charge 4 = |mu4| (flux -4 pi per centre); HONEST SHARPENING: for the Ricci-flat ALE the asymptotic log coefficient is EXACTLY 0 (EH: u K' = sqrt(u^2 + a^4), det g = 1) -- the log lives at the exceptional locus; Burns contrast (K = u + N log u => det g != 1, only scalar-flat); bonus: multipole selection rule m = 0 mod 4, first symmetry-breaking multipole (4, +-4) carries -a0 with amplitude (35/16) sin^4 th. [E] NEGATIVE CONTROLS: so8 (lambda~^2 = 12 irrational; perfect squares in the Deligne series only {9, 36} = {sl3, e8}); diag(i, i) (Veronese, 5 generators, no hypersurface, the bijection collapses); k = 2 (three channels; honest: lambda~^2 = 36 is k-independent, the kill is the closure dial). [C] conditional on Costello's flat-PT matching lambda_g^2 E = A. [O] the quantised BCOV one-loop coefficient on PT/Z4; the twisted channels (32 T3) are not covered by the bulk axion -- M1-M3 preregistered VERBATIM: M1 the A3 Omega_N on PT/Z4 (success: (2 pi i)^2 periods with lockstep phases; kill: unequal fluxes => the v509 dial dies); M2 the twisted KS measure (success: bulk 36 + sphere axions cancel 32 T3; kill: a leftover T3); M3 the a0 uplift of the (4, +-4) multipole (success: log correction prop 4 = |mu4|; kill: decoupling from the centre count). No marker moves anywhere.

Read the original Python source
Linked claims

Different evidence answers different questions.

A numerical calculation, a formal theorem and an experimental comparison carry different kinds of information. Follow the source appropriate to the claim.

Python calculations
Inspect the algorithm, its inputs and its negative controls. Run a browser compatible module here, or use the repository for the complete environment.Browse Python sources
Formal mathematics
Read the actual Lean statement and its assumptions. The carrier formalization has a defined mathematical scope.Inspect the Lean formalization
Independent implementation
The Wolfram implementation checks algebraic results through a separate computational path. The recorded runs report 116/116 base checks and 603/603 extension checks. This is distinct from external experimental replication.Read the Wolfram implementation
Physical comparison
Read each prediction with its freeze, conditions and failure criterion. A passing mathematical check does not decide the experimental comparison.Open the prediction register

Run the same check on your machine.

From a checkout of the repository, install its Python requirements and run the first lattice module. The complete suite is a separate step.

Set up the repository

git clone https://github.com/sthamann/tfpt.git
cd tfpt
python3 -m venv .venv
.venv/bin/pip install -r requirements.txt

Check the E₈ lattice

.venv/bin/python verification/v1_e8_glue.py

Read the individual checks and the final pass or fail result.

Run the registered suite

cd verification
../.venv/bin/python run_all.py

The full suite uses the dependencies and source context documented in the repository.

Repository setup and maintenance instructions

Read the current claim beside its source.

The research snapshot dated 2026-11-02 includes the active ledger, reviewed findings and registered scripts. It records source coverage and stated scope; it is not a new execution of every proof or calculation.

Trace the dependencies.

Select a node to inspect its inputs, outputs, scope and verification scripts. Browser compatible checks open the same verification viewer; native certificates provide their local command.

Explore the complete dependency graph

Keep the detailed research in reach.

The script index, figures and detailed research interfaces remain available below. This older technical overview preserves its original statements; use the current result inventory to follow later scope corrections.

Open the script index, figures and research details