The holomorphic restriction of E₈ invariants
Original ledger classification: Symbolic [PROOF] mu4-orbit vanishing + [E] G31 invariance/independence/mirror census + [E, kill] complex-structure controls + [cited] Chevalley basic-invariant theorem (exact arithmetic; Python-only per GATE.WOLFRAM.02).
Recorded statement: The quartic invariant restriction (review contract E8.QUARTIC.HALF.01) -- is G31 the holomorphic mu4 shadow of the E8 Coxeter compiler? ALIVE, with the honest split (one module, 22 checks, ~1 s, exact Gaussian-integer/Fraction arithmetic,…
Statement, assumptions and sources
Paper context: Architecture, E8 and the electromagnetic fixed point
The exact identifier, original classification and full claim are available below.
The source wording and classification below are preserved as recorded. A paper link, shared script or authored topic relation does not upgrade the claim or report a new proof run. Read later reviewed findings separately.
Read the exact registered claim and its dependencies
E8.QUARTICHALF.01
Original ledger classification: Symbolic [PROOF] mu4-orbit vanishing + [E] G31 invariance/independence/mirror census + [E, kill] complex-structure controls + [cited] Chevalley basic-invariant theorem (exact arithmetic; Python-only per GATE.WOLFRAM.02).
Original claim text
The quartic invariant restriction (review contract E8.QUARTIC.HALF.01) -- is G31 the holomorphic mu4 shadow of the E8 Coxeter compiler? ALIVE, with the honest split (one module, 22 checks, ~1 s, exact Gaussian-integer/Fraction arithmetic, no floats; discovery probe quartic_half_probe.py 22/22, verdict QUARTIC-HALF-ALIVE). THE VANISHING HALF [PROOF, typed honest]: {2,14,18,30} is TRUE but TRIVIAL -- W(J alpha) = -i W(alpha) for all 240 roots => every J-orbit contributes t^d (1 + (-i)^d + (-1)^d + i^d) = 0 for every d != 0 mod 4 (holds for 6, 10, 22, 26 too: mu4 orbit factor, NOT degree-list-specific); degrees 4/6 vanish on ANY q-isotropic subspace (f_4 = 576 q^2, f_6 = 1920 q^3 symbolically); F_4| has all 35 monomial coefficients = 0 exactly (the first G31-consistency point: mod-4 alone would allow F_4 != 0). THE LOAD-BEARING CONTENT [E, central]: F_8|, F_12|, F_20|, F_24| are G31-invariant (60/60 hermitian reflections + clock generators, exact), ALGEBRAICALLY INDEPENDENT (exact Jacobian != 0 off the mirrors), degrees (8,12,20,24) Molien-unique with product 46080 = |G31| => by Chevalley [cited] a system of BASIC INVARIANTS: the holomorphic restriction of the W(E8) invariant ring generates the FULL G31 invariant ring; the Jacobian carries the 60 mirror lines (deg Jac = 60 = sum(d_i - 1), on-mirror vanishing point-verified 60/60; the full factorization = cited standard theorem, NAMED residual). MUST-FAIL CONTROLS [E, kill]: J' = RJR^T (orthogonal, NOT root-preserving) breaks the informative half {14,18,22,26,30} while the trivial isotropy layers persist; the root-preserving J'' keeps the full pattern (the theorem is about the W(E8)-conjugacy class of compiler-compatible J); a random non-isotropic 4-space breaks even F_2; honest negative: signed-permutation J-conjugates canNOT serve as controls (they stay in W(D8)). No marker move. [2026-08-03 LI: formally verified -- the mu4-orbit vanishing mechanism (orbit factor 1 + (-i)^d + (-1)^d + i^d = 0 iff d != 0 mod 4, per-pair weight law, the full vanishing half incl. the trivial extras) and the quartic power sum Sum <alpha,x>^4 = 576 (Sum x_i^2)^2 over the explicit 240 roots (+ holomorphic isotropy) are kernel-checked in Lean 4 (experiments/lean4-carrier-rigidity/TfptCarrier/QuarticHalf.lean, lake build green, no sorry / native_decide); the Chevalley basic-invariant step remains CITED, not formalized.]
Original classification detail
QUARTIC-HALF-ALIVE: the vanishing half {2,14,18,30} proven symbolically but TRIVIAL (mu4 orbit factor, honest typing); the substance: F8/F12/F20/F24 algebraically independent G31 basic invariants (holomorphic restriction generates the FULL G31 ring, Chevalley cited); Jacobian carries the 60 mirrors (60/60 point-verified); controls fire exactly as demanded.
Dependencies as recorded
E8.ST31.01; E8.ST31DEG.01; v634; v647; v654
Open the original ledger source, row 661Location recorded in the ledger
These document locations are recorded directly on the ledger row. They are document level navigation, rather than a newly inferred section citation.
- Architecture, E8 and the electromagnetic fixed point
- Standard Model and flavor structure
- E8 audit and bootstrap
Sections that explicitly cite this claim
A literal claim identifier is present in these paper sections. The section and its premises determine what the citation supports.
- How to read this documenttfpt 1 architecture e8
- How to read this documentArchitecture, E8 and the electromagnetic fixed point
- The Sheet Diamond and the Winding Line: masses and transport from one surfacetfpt 2 standard model
- Front matter / supportStandard Model and flavor structure
- Front matter / supportE8 audit and bootstrap
- Group-theoretic audits (optional)input 5 tfpt 3 e8 audit bootstrap
- How to read this documenttfpt 1 architecture e8
- Group-theoretic audits (optional)input 5 tfpt 3 e8 audit bootstrap
Navigation through a shared verification script
These sections cite a script associated with the claim. This is a source navigation join, rather than an explicit citation of the claim or a theorem equivalence.
- Research Contract 2 — [formula in source]tfpt research contracts
- The Gaussian code bridge: [formula in source] over [formula in source] , the extended Hamming code, and a four-bit information layerE8 and the Gaussian code
- Front matter / supportTFPT — Introduction and reading guide; Verification reference catalog
- Research Contract 2 — [formula in source]tfpt research contracts
- 2026-10-18: Project separation and retained physics historyResearch changelog; TFPT — Introduction and reading guide
Registered verification modules
- v690_quartic_half.pyRegistered verification module · core
Read the description recorded in the module registry
E8.QUARTICHALF.01: die quartische Invarianten-Restriktion (Review-Vertrag E8.QUARTIC.HALF.01) — ist G31 der holomorphe μ4-Schatten des E8-Compilers? AM LEBEN, mit dem ehrlichen Split: **die Verschwinde-Hälfte {2,14,18,30} ist WAHR aber TRIVIAL (μ4-Orbitfaktor, symbolisch bewiesen: W(Jα) = −i·W(α) ⇒ jeder J-Orbit trägt t^d(1+(−i)^d+(−1)^d+i^d) = 0 für d ≢ 0 mod 4 — gilt auch für 6,10,22,26); DIE SUBSTANZ: F8|, F12|, F20|, F24| sind G31-invariant (60/60 Spiegel exakt), ALGEBRAISCH UNABHÄNGIG (exakte Jacobi-Determinante ≠ 0), Grade Molien-eindeutig mit Produkt 46080 = |G31| ⇒ per Chevalley [zitiert] BASISINVARIANTEN: die holomorphe Restriktion des W(E8)-Rings erzeugt den VOLLEN G31-Ring**; die Jacobi-Determinante trägt die 60 Spiegellinien (Grad 60 = Σ(d_i−1), punktverifiziert 60/60; volle Faktorisierung = zitierter Satz, benanntes Residual); Kontrollen: J′ = RJRᵀ bricht die informative Hälfte, das wurzelerhaltende J″ erhält alles (der Satz gilt der W(E8)-Konjugationsklasse); keine Floats; kein Marker-Move (22 Checks, ~1 s)
A registered module is a source reference. Its presence does not assert that the module was executed in this snapshot.