Skip to main content

Explore the foundations and current research.

Follow the published construction into its registered claims, then explore reviewed research questions, attempts and the connections that remain open.

What has been tried, and what follows

Insufficient for the goal

Use holomorphic KMS uniqueness as microscopic charged generator

CitedtheoremalreadyassumesB/definesomegaasitsrestriction.GroupaverageandlocallyrepairedTakesakistepdonotgeneratemissingfields.

For a new attempt: Firstderiveactualchargedlocalalgebra/fielddictionaryfromoriginaloperations;thenapplyKMS/modulartransport.Donotuseglobalrotationonfixedintervalaslocalmodulartime.

Read the question and its evidence

Scoped exclusion

Locally repair global odd-spinor Phi by KMS or global parity

FullSOURCE-W1/Cartanfourword+I/-Iandthermaltwo-edgeresponsedistinguishunchangedoperators.Total-evenretainsodd/odd;LEFT-evenremovesSOURCE-W1.

For a new attempt: ConstructoriginallyjustifiedchangedCartan/statistics/netmapwithchargedfieldcarrier,fullwords,timeandprimitivewindingcomparison.Nospectral/KMSclaimasasubstitute.

Read the question and its evidence

Insufficient for the goal

Derive existing parity-Gauss rule only from original P1 definitions

Forward source comparison identifies a concrete insertion/localization definition gap. The seed already takes the local net as input; no inverse selection of the gauge net or full P1 compatibility of both models is proved.

For a new attempt: Build no further extension. A later decision needs the originally defined local insertion/sector map with Padm/Gx, state, time, reflection and primitive winding identification. State this gap and stop.

Read the question and its evidence

Reusable result

Reuse original minimality and domain audit

The specific proof steps are audited; generic bound0 is refuted and replaced by correct conditional hypotheses. The source inverse still needs an actual defined local reconstruction.

For a new attempt: Continue only with a precise source map, complete correlators or newly proved symbol/domain bounds. A freely chosen helper model does not replace these conditions.

Read the question and its evidence

Scoped exclusion

Parallelity as a silent axiom

The 2+2/3+1 comparison excludes only under explicit common parallelity and irreducibility. These are additional premises, not accepted TFPT axioms.

For a new attempt: Derive an original common covariance/transport rule before rejecting a packet.

Read the question and its evidence

Scoped exclusion

Reuse the sign-only dynamics obstruction

The fixed sign projector loses |H|; a=2 and a=3 yield the same rho_0 and C.

For a new attempt: Proceed only with complete transfer or faithful KMS covariance.

Read the question and its evidence

Reusable result

Reuse full-transfer/KMS reconstruction

Injectivity holds exactly under the named faithfulness and completeness conditions.

For a new attempt: Still supply physical identification of the TFPT channel.

Read the question and its evidence

Reusable result

Use complete two-face reconstruction

This inverse is analytically settled; do not repeat Hamiltonian search when complete G is supplied.

For a new attempt: For source selection supply the actual original graph kernel, fiber comparison and normal length; G generated from a guessed B is not a provenance derivation.

Read the question and its evidence

Reusable result

Reuse the existing GKLS q interval

The specified source proof is available and need not be searched for again as a missing derivation.

For a new attempt: A different starting equation or physical realization requires its own justification.

Read the question and its evidence

Scoped exclusion

Do not repeat homogeneous GKSL time search for the fixed M4 channel

The all-branch proof also excludes every positive integer power.

For a new attempt: Time-dependent execution or a larger justified source is a different comparison class, not a repair of the same homogeneous M4 generator.

Read the question and its evidence

Reusable result

Reuse the ratio, keep the absolute anchor open

The discrete ratio is closed, while U_f* remains a separate open source-selection task.

For a new attempt: Continue only with the absolute scale.

Read the question and its evidence

Insufficient for the goal

Numerical root as origin proof

An exact root confirms only the chosen equation and inputs; it does not select them.

For a new attempt: Derive the missing input and readout selector independently.

Read the question and its evidence