Skip to main content

Follow the question, attempts and conclusions.

Follow the published construction into its registered claims, then explore reviewed research questions, attempts and the connections that remain open.

Alpha: derived terms, unique root and physical EM identification

Where do the factors and closed alpha equation come from, which provenance steps are proved, and which precise physical EM identification remains open?

What has been learned

Established in scope

Historical alpha factors and definition steps reconstructed from original sources

In the question: Alpha: derived terms, unique root and physical EM identification

Source provenance and exact algebra under each stated normalization, carrier, primitive sector and defect response contract. No general nonderivability theorem, no retraction of the canonical circle defect line, marked D5 response or positive root uniqueness. No new physical selector or ledger promotion. Historical linear, exponential, quadratic and resummed openings are different calculation contracts; similar coefficients do not prove identical physical actions.

Read the exact result, assumptions and evidence

Result

Older originals give explicit factor provenance: V1.06 uses g=n/(8pi²), n=1 and g=8c3². ImprovedCubic of18September2025 gives linear backreaction1-2alpha; v2.7 derives exp(-alpha J) under additive defect coupling with J=d SF=2. In the later carrier gamma=tr_EY²=3/9+2/4=5/6 and B=rankE3/rankE2=3/2, so B gamma=5/4; family trace tr(S+)Y²=10/3 gives b1=41/10 for three families and one Higgs. The rank-one determinant yields (1-q)^(-5/4); its response q+(5/4)q²+(45/32)q³+... embeds the earlier two-defect coefficient in a fixed series. These factors must not be dismissed collectively as unexplained fits. Full identification remains narrower: v2.7 declares the CFE potential coefficients as supplied scheme inputs; v4.2 supplies P_loc'=alpha³-2c3³alpha² as a condition and defines Gamma by integrating the desired response. The master proof identifies its U(1) block with the already-defined EM action; it does not evaluate an original coupled Dirac determinant to obtain that F there.

Required assumptions

  • P1/P2 remain declared starting axioms

    This program checks which additional source, state, event, and observable structures follow from accepted TFPT principles; it does not revoke or replace P1/P2.

  • Model results remain conditional

    Calculations in a fixed E8 net, quotient, family packet, or readout apply only under their stated inputs and do not select those inputs.

Original evidence

finding:alpha-archive-term-provenance-and-master-functional-scope

Established in scope

EM origin: solved finite steps and precise remaining functional identification

In the question: Alpha: derived terms, unique root and physical EM identification

Source-reviewed status/type correction, not a new general nonderivability theorem or gate. P1/P2 remain accepted starting principles; being axioms is not an objection. The line is derived on the old circle, not an arbitrary vector to select again. v382 replay26October:6/6; literalTrue status checks do not prove open functional origin. Ledger Numerical and full physical status remain unchanged.

Read the exact result, assumptions and evidence

Result

Coefficient identities and the unique alpha root are retained. The old circle canonically supplies Pi and det_F(1-qPi)=1-q; for trace-class C-P the same relative factor survives exactly in every faithful KMS polarization class on that same circle. Actual full positive projection covariance fixes the whole CAR state without an extra Gaussian premise. The finite Quillen chain is beyond its older open summary: v985 resolves the finite mu4 channel swap; v995 closes finite KMS rigidity and state extension; v1014 checks the finite determinant-line restriction isomorphism and records reference A0. Do not reopen those steps. What remains is the original local EM source/operator map and relative real renormalized determinant norm producing the seam factor with response exponent5/4, coupling q(alpha), local variation terms and normalization in the same channel. Abstract continuum/Bismut-Freed identification and matching to the physical Thomson coupling do not follow from finite calculations. Chiral phase cancellation does not refute real EM susceptibility. EM.WARD.01 and ALPHA.QUILLEN.EXACT.01 retain their existing physical residual.

Required assumptions

  • Specified EM function with positive seam response

    F(x)=x³−2c³x²+(4/5)c⁶M log(p+q(1−q)^(−5/4)), c=1/(8π), p=1/(6π), q=48c⁴exp(−2x), M>0; original budget M=41. The function and inputs are premises here.

  • Model results remain conditional

    Calculations in a fixed E8 net, quotient, family packet, or readout apply only under their stated inputs and do not select those inputs.

  • P1/P2 remain declared starting axioms

    This program checks which additional source, state, event, and observable structures follow from accepted TFPT principles; it does not revoke or replace P1/P2.

  • Same original circle with trace-class changed polarization

    For the mathematical continuation retain H,B_a psi_n=(n+a)psi_n,0<a<1,u psi_n=psi_(n+1),P=1_(B_a<0),uPu*=P+Pi. C is a positive contraction with trace-class C-P; actual functional-calculus C_beta=(I+exp(beta B_a))^-1,beta>0 belongs to this class. Physical KMS/OS/EM source identification is not presumed.

  • Test a positive joint CAR source against the full geometric projection

    Consider an arbitrary normalized positive state on the specified joint charged two-face CAR algebra,without assuming quasifreeness or U1 invariance. The geometric target is the existing closed chiral annulus graph P_A with both marked faces,W=1/2 and original NS B_Sigma. Actual identity C_source=P_A is an explicit condition of the uniqueness theorem and an unresolved P1 source equation,not a fact inferred from geometry or RP. A finite error test applies only on a genuinely P_A reducing CAR block. Complete Dirac vector source,OS Padm and physical time are not identified with this chiral scalar target. No freely chosen purification supplies missing physical cross correlations.

  • Do not identify source types

    Observable algebra, OS reflection, state, collar operator, time evolution, carrier connection, family holonomy, and readout are distinct data until an original map relates them.

Original evidence

  • 007-source.tex lines 50–101

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    documents/tfpt_1_architecture_e8/sections/007-source.tex

    7e1cb59fef4de49deefe8f63b5d777e83528d0119e51191595784ee8c30dcd86

  • DIRECT-DEFECT-CLOSURE.txt lines 20–109

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    experiments/theory-contracts/original-admissible-source-closure-20261025/DIRECT-DEFECT-CLOSURE.txt

    84a79c74da8b18387a3d2d8a9928e4a437a608120b52a46c7ede6392cf1128ff

  • EM-MEASURE-AND-QUILLEN.txt lines 18–127

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    experiments/theory-contracts/original-admissible-source-closure-20261025/EM-MEASURE-AND-QUILLEN.txt

    a08abf23cab682b6c4733fb2403293b1de0245973864f77447544cde53422c65

  • status_ledger.csv lines 445–445

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    verification/status_ledger.csv

    8723b921bdc50a6157acc6bee4342b40586eb89bec6d7dcc0abc3309562c78b4

  • status_ledger.csv lines 752–754

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    verification/status_ledger.csv

    8723b921bdc50a6157acc6bee4342b40586eb89bec6d7dcc0abc3309562c78b4

  • KMS-AND-CARRIER-TRANSPORT.txt lines 38–159

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    experiments/theory-contracts/original-admissible-source-closure-20261025/KMS-AND-CARRIER-TRANSPORT.txt

    9efcfb0d68e16db842aab97b7171b2d667e7b065cb4c6ab8138102acc4c8fb68

  • PROJECTOR-STATE-RIGIDITY.txt lines 30–100

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    experiments/theory-contracts/native-arc-charge-source-interface-20261026/PROJECTOR-STATE-RIGIDITY.txt

    2e14e8875c263d71bd6bda61d005461cb718bdf30fdf34a6312db53167cd80c6

finding:alpha-exact-coefficients-and-root-retain-specific-physical-ward-obligation

Established in scope

The marked D5 grade response derives exponent5/4 from the same E8 source

In the question: Alpha: derived terms, unique root and physical EM identification

Exact response in the specified existing source, not a new field or fitted exponent. Does not derive physical preparation, u=48c3^4, q=exp(-2alpha), outer uq, baseline1/(6pi), or original EM instrument. Common time is not sector-resolved D5 readout. Replay26October2026:21/21; finite coefficient checks through degree12 do not replace the general series proof.

Read the exact result, assumptions and evidence

Result

Exactly G_u(q5,q3)=[(1-u)/(1-uq5)]^(5/4)[(1-u)/(1-uq3)]^(3/4). Hence G_u(q,1)/G_u(0,1)=(1-uq)^(-5/4); the common-time diagonal G_u(q,q) instead has exponent2. Powers follow from actual charge norms and the convergent oscillator series. Normalized local T5 insertion has Ward coefficient5/8. Fixed C/J do not generally preserve P5 but jointly transport charge and marking covariantly.

Required assumptions

  • Marked regularized E8 charged state and sector-grade response

    Existing positive E8_1 lattice vacuum source with original D5/A3 marking and 48 retained charges beta: beta^t P5 beta=5/4, beta^t P3 beta=3/4, beta²=2. The regularized charged vertex state has free preparation parameter u=r² in (0,1). N5,N3 are strongly commuting nonnegative oscillator grades; q5,q3 in [0,1] parametrize spectral readout. Keep original C/J matrices. u=48c3^4, q=exp(-2alpha), physical preparation, instrument and common time do not follow.

  • Model results remain conditional

    Calculations in a fixed E8 net, quotient, family packet, or readout apply only under their stated inputs and do not select those inputs.

Original evidence

  • PROOF.txt lines 26–176

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    experiments/theory-contracts/charged-sector-readout-clock-20261013/PROOF.txt

    26e6480a6304e4da5be96328e70f5f56c5bee1bfde7e58593a34a273016d09e0

  • checker.py lines 42–117

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    experiments/theory-contracts/charged-sector-readout-clock-20261013/checker.py

    bf949d11034c1d17322971b58c712c0bef01bb6a3d0e6aa63aeca6d7d41b45d6

finding:marked-e8-sector-grade-response-realizes-five-quarters

Established in scope

Existence and uniqueness of the positive root are proved

In the question: Alpha: derived terms, unique root and physical EM identification

Mathematical theorem for the fixed function; not a cubic polynomial because the seam response depends on x. No parameter or physical Thomson-transfer derivation; ledger Numerical unchanged.

Read the exact result, assumptions and evidence

Result

Log-convexity of the stated seam response and the sign before x=2c³ prove exactly one positive simple root globally. For M=41 its reciprocal is approximately 137.0359992168407. The analytic proof is distinct from the 10 rerun symbolic/interval checks. It holds for every M>0 and therefore does not select M=41.

Required assumptions

  • Specified EM function with positive seam response

    F(x)=x³−2c³x²+(4/5)c⁶M log(p+q(1−q)^(−5/4)), c=1/(8π), p=1/(6π), q=48c⁴exp(−2x), M>0; original budget M=41. The function and inputs are premises here.

Original evidence

  • PROOF.txt lines 1–76

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    experiments/theory-contracts/em-positive-root-convexity-20261013/PROOF.txt

    c1ad319037418e7745c287132c4065cf6d963af797c5a4c81f12273e486d7b50

finding:alpha-global-positive-root-unique

Conditional result

Minimal EM transfer is exact in its stated response contract

In the question: Alpha: derived terms, unique root and physical EM identification

Historical minimal-transfer definition with fixed readout; the single line has since been canonically reconstructed on the old circle. Neither this reconstruction nor independently proved root uniqueness is retracted. Original physical P1/EM mapping and renormalized Thomson observable remain separate.

Read the exact result, assumptions and evidence

Result

For the defined rank-one projector U_Sigma^min and stated parameters, T_Sigma=(1-delta_top exp(-2 alpha))^(-5/4) and the displayed scalar closure equation follow algebraically. This calculation does not independently prove physical selection of that projector, parameter set, or transfer to the Thomson readout.

Required assumptions

  • P1/P2 remain declared starting axioms

    This program checks which additional source, state, event, and observable structures follow from accepted TFPT principles; it does not revoke or replace P1/P2.

  • Model results remain conditional

    Calculations in a fixed E8 net, quotient, family packet, or readout apply only under their stated inputs and do not select those inputs.

Original evidence

  • 001-section-kernel-numerics-and-electromagnetic-closure.tex lines 95–150

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    documents/archive--tfpt-45--source_extracts--03_em_flavor_source/sections/001-section-kernel-numerics-and-electromagnetic-closure.tex

    5fdbdc1b7d8af7f85e5fc2435f567402b3dbcb96938951e58e633cf42549c7e2

  • DIRECT-DEFECT-CLOSURE.txt lines 20–109

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    experiments/theory-contracts/original-admissible-source-closure-20261025/DIRECT-DEFECT-CLOSURE.txt

    84a79c74da8b18387a3d2d8a9928e4a437a608120b52a46c7ede6392cf1128ff

finding:alpha-equation-is-fixed-input-closure

Approaches and conclusions

The reviewed decision record says which approach can be reused, which failed in its scope and what a new attempt would have to change.

Insufficient for the goal

Numerical root as origin proof

An exact root confirms only the chosen equation and inputs; it does not select them.

Consequence: Derive the missing input and readout selector independently.

Reusable result

Reuse the existing convexity proof

Positive root uniqueness is already analytically closed; another numerical scan would not be a new derivation.

Consequence: Specify a genuinely different function or a violated convexity premise.

What is resolved, and what remains

Resolved in scope

Separate root calculation from source selection

The closure equation for the defined rank-one projector and the still-open derivation of its inputs are documented as separate statements.

Open task

Derive the actual EM functional variation and Thomson identification

The projector, weights, parameters, and renormalized observable are derived from original principles and the same physical channel.

Next investigation: Reuse the canonical defect line, KMS determinant persistence, full projection-state theorem and solved finite v985/v995/v1014 steps. Obtain the actual coupled EM operator, local terms and reference from the same original source; identify its real relative determinant norm and variation with F and establish low-momentum current normalization matching Thomson alpha. Do not demand a new arbitrary projector or Gaussian choice.

Builds on: Separate root calculation from source selection

Resolved in scope

Establish the unique global positive root

Analytic existence and uniqueness proof on the entire positive half-line for the same original function.

Connections to other questions

constrains under

Common clock sectors, quartic geometry and operational reconstruction

Reuse the existing direct circle line, proved W8 completion and full-projector-covariance uniqueness in joint source reconstruction. Do not demand an independent Gaussian state choice after actual full positive projection covariance is proved. For original EM establish the actual insertion, same state/time/reflection and unnormalized relative response; matching exponents or freely selected face states do not replace this.

Original historical attempts linked to this question

These are original research records. Their reported verdicts are distinct from the reviewed results above.

charged sector readout clock 20261013

Can the original marked E8 charged response realize the alpha factor with exponent5/4 under the same source time and actual clocks?

Recorded verdict: PARTIAL

Historical inventory; not independently reviewed by this export.

  • contract_index.json lines 1–67

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    experiments/theory-contracts/charged-sector-readout-clock-20261013/contract_index.json

    df8084830f684f01ebe0325ac814e7c0d356dc82f6b4da674740dbdad5864e93

  • PROOF.txt lines 1–199

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    experiments/theory-contracts/charged-sector-readout-clock-20261013/PROOF.txt

    26e6480a6304e4da5be96328e70f5f56c5bee1bfde7e58593a34a273016d09e0

  • checker.py lines 1–119

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    experiments/theory-contracts/charged-sector-readout-clock-20261013/checker.py

    bf949d11034c1d17322971b58c712c0bef01bb6a3d0e6aa63aeca6d7d41b45d6

  • source_manifest.json lines 1–24

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    experiments/theory-contracts/charged-sector-readout-clock-20261013/source_manifest.json

    5ce972e36ec7f8f4f7770f6a0ce302f1d6a9020c32e491d25b23cbfa1466695a

  • neutral_source_response.py lines 1–293

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    tfpt_explorer/neutral_source_response.py

    a6a21749cba24ae6c50c1f4e1cf95bf283c69ec9b2167a7089380188c5cd8898

  • current_block_geometry.py lines 1–2015

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    tfpt_explorer/current_block_geometry.py

    c9efcac4ba33d4ee3dc20f8c3c69a0f6ff6b2084893a5edf4aaae6c204d9056b

  • certificate.json lines 1–3631

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    experiments/theory-contracts/compiler-integral-triality-20260918/certificate.json

    a342f865bec164ae6dd54e9e7b7c7cc991efcf7a939dda2ecab586b4a6c6cfe3

  • PROOF.txt lines 1–406

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    experiments/theory-contracts/charged-source-time-audit-20260920/PROOF.txt

    97ddf9206a860c00d797dc62bb23b6d731523ca21c10280592f6c61e8a0b2476

  • README.md lines 1–76

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    experiments/theory-contracts/seam-readout-flow-deck-20261005/README.md

    62c3fee7d8e34745c2199230f1a8fc04d8d90e77a771d9f0d9b787a801edcc48

  • results.json lines 1–125

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    experiments/theory-contracts/charged-sector-readout-clock-20261013/results.json

    548de0930bdfb44e6bc190ba9385b3e37e129e3f47c2f8cdae30f2455d44cfe9

  • findings_overrides.json lines 1–1396

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    verification/findings_overrides.json

    aa67c3ed6617aab61c3c7fa9b29e0412d01ab193c62245491563c376151746a5

em positive root convexity 20261013

Can the fixed original EM closure function be proved to have exactly one simple positive root without relying on the numerical derivative scan?

Recorded verdict: PARTIAL

Historical inventory; not independently reviewed by this export.

  • contract_index.json lines 1–51

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    experiments/theory-contracts/em-positive-root-convexity-20261013/contract_index.json

    3dfe6542dcf79f59905f20afb2ade4ef8406e7274992eb1cc20ee7cab2792cbd

  • PROOF.txt lines 1–80

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    experiments/theory-contracts/em-positive-root-convexity-20261013/PROOF.txt

    c1ad319037418e7745c287132c4065cf6d963af797c5a4c81f12273e486d7b50

  • README.md lines 1–5

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    experiments/theory-contracts/em-positive-root-convexity-20261013/README.md

    d27f6939d99aa02c2dfba2a7b46bba9c2d6014696fd8572530d9391e0f8ab6ca

  • checker.py lines 1–61

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    experiments/theory-contracts/em-positive-root-convexity-20261013/checker.py

    24b14c59cd5dff98e79920b35c71093127f330ff721b46943b6b0e60811945fb

  • source_manifest.json lines 1–20

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    experiments/theory-contracts/em-positive-root-convexity-20261013/source_manifest.json

    6f09422ccb0a713dbaea94c96834079c9c525b1ff590ef9bb16987435f046b97

  • ORIGINAL_RUN.json lines 1–15

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    experiments/theory-contracts/em-positive-root-convexity-20261013/ORIGINAL_RUN.json

    2963fd109a255fd5fe1945d472649ef7cafa01d221e21760b66d0a168169e307

  • tfpt_1_architecture_e8.tex lines 1–1

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    tfpt_1_architecture_e8.tex

    45a26936328c7464bcca138329e7361eb8ee89a597d29fed281af6785ace43a5

  • v13_open_gates.py lines 1–59

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    verification/v13_open_gates.py

    892b757498342f24d41683c33a65eba3e1e133d41143b72b66ddb518737bd131

  • v3_em_alpha.py lines 1–140

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    verification/v3_em_alpha.py

    22f769d9f89e74e2279c06b11c75d6da4d7455ef185fb2f79869a30932ebc3e8

  • results.json lines 1–56

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    experiments/theory-contracts/em-positive-root-convexity-20261013/results.json

    28518491a71843f025228bc28c183b71f524740b703a7570cc622c9e60086401

  • findings_overrides.json lines 1–1396

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    verification/findings_overrides.json

    aa67c3ed6617aab61c3c7fa9b29e0412d01ab193c62245491563c376151746a5

source flavor origin 20260920

Do the original global carrier group and actual native cubic select a consistent source-level route to distinct Down/lepton masses and phases?

Recorded verdict: PARTIAL

Historical inventory; not independently reviewed by this export.

  • contract_index.json lines 1–84

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    experiments/theory-contracts/source-flavor-origin-20260920/contract_index.json

    c5893a43e40f48483c7577eac0e1c70e0b477593f3f2cf79d6bb9067aa404fe2

  • PROOF.txt lines 1–233

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    experiments/theory-contracts/source-flavor-origin-20260920/PROOF.txt

    328158deea8bab9ac552c1d4f44eb64f79724264501a5d8a7276e873c5c9b314

  • README.md lines 1–67

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    experiments/theory-contracts/source-flavor-origin-20260920/README.md

    97fb0475cd000953089b6b0a98ca500a71cb22c53f17fe424fb6f31bcde27fd7

  • checker.py lines 1–144

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    experiments/theory-contracts/source-flavor-origin-20260920/checker.py

    da4cc9430e9834d5e9e1008061edce4999c3699f0933f1f9a56e7dee8b998387

  • source_manifest.json lines 1–70

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    experiments/theory-contracts/source-flavor-origin-20260920/source_manifest.json

    85bce198a39e27d388f9c09beec4050f44e399f5964b96829cae93d2f2800530

  • SPEC.txt lines 1–34

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    experiments/theory-contracts/source-flavor-origin-20260920/SPEC.txt

    74929c226d5d07daff059635a24fc0639d3710fe4128d8585361df21869de7b3

  • FLAVOR_REVIEW.txt lines 1–176

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    experiments/theory-contracts/source-flavor-origin-20260920/FLAVOR_REVIEW.txt

    f3bb1c0c6bb9a20347e4f21f9ab70a0d2b5f297d8e7118b8fa3a9b36242eaf70

  • GLOBAL_CHARGE_REVIEW.txt lines 1–341

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    experiments/theory-contracts/source-flavor-origin-20260920/GLOBAL_CHARGE_REVIEW.txt

    57463740887525fe9dc007005b106af96312c220f2a67ce5bef6acfd571de577

  • tfpt_1_architecture_e8.tex lines 1–1

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    tfpt_1_architecture_e8.tex

    45a26936328c7464bcca138329e7361eb8ee89a597d29fed281af6785ace43a5

  • tfpt_2_standard_model.tex lines 1–1

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    tfpt_2_standard_model.tex

    00035c071a4d037ede785fb65cd55dfe1cb34430a935ef534620ba38a40436a6

  • v46_grand_mass_volume.py lines 1–69

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    verification/v46_grand_mass_volume.py

    19163c77032de2fd910409cfdfdadc6635ad0ae945c44e89b1751d1d4269fb90

  • v252_full_finite_triple.py lines 1–375

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    verification/v252_full_finite_triple.py

    820254440e178430422e50605067775656236602996307f67c9e69124ba5d163

  • certificate.json lines 1–1008

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    experiments/theory-contracts/compiler-vacuum-current-cubic-20260918/certificate.json

    150f27876e19fba789b497d53b1dc02b3d9f2f02704b991cc214cfc8e0ab51eb

  • PROOF.txt lines 1–137

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    experiments/theory-contracts/compiler-vacuum-current-cubic-20260918/PROOF.txt

    d65189b806facbb1eb718eec50221bb85b3a8c3417f98fb6627e01c72c98ef62

  • source_pins.json lines 1–25

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    experiments/theory-contracts/compiler-vacuum-current-cubic-20260918/source_pins.json

    a6e3588e75768a37747606d57802c358f1fe7b94752e8691f412261320ed779b

  • PROOF.md lines 1–275

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    experiments/theory-contracts/source-boundary-selection-20260920/PROOF.md

    4081e9f7bc19da9cf87234edf361bb0ab29eaf8e5f69d23f7c6708b4512be0ff

  • PROOF.txt lines 1–61

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    experiments/theory-contracts/phase-origin-yukawa-defect-20260919/PROOF.txt

    4d3f9e0b24b445e0d72fc7816e6c5aa860c8c8f957cbd997291e704958a154e0

  • certificate.optimized.json lines 1–3013

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    experiments/theory-contracts/source-flavor-origin-20260920/certificate.optimized.json

    3efa28973698464e873b0ae2bde82469a73e1f1bf3543c85a33e63bfe931a9ca

  • certificate.json lines 1–3013

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    experiments/theory-contracts/source-flavor-origin-20260920/certificate.json

    3efa28973698464e873b0ae2bde82469a73e1f1bf3543c85a33e63bfe931a9ca

  • findings_overrides.json lines 1–1396

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    verification/findings_overrides.json

    aa67c3ed6617aab61c3c7fa9b29e0412d01ab193c62245491563c376151746a5