Established in scope
Bilinear sheet pairing is not Hermitian kernel selection
In the question: Which partner actually belongs to the original seam?
Correction of the finite selection inference; no identification of I with the actual Calderon operator and no P1 countermodel.
Read the exact result, assumptions and evidence
Result
CAR.PAIR.01 counts complex-bilinear singlets. The Hermitian scalar <f,g> already exists on S+; CAR.PAIR.02's 'scalar iff sheet-odd' inference is false in this reading. The previous J_C includes reversion signs and is fully Spin(10)-equivariant.
Required assumptions
- Original oriented exterior carrier
Given E=C5=E3⊕E2, a Hermitian metric, volume orientation, S± and Y=(-1/3)^3⊕(1/2)^2. Internal carrier labels are not physical vacua; geometric seam reflection is not identified with carrier conjugation.
Original evidence
- PROOF.txt lines 39–78
Source checked at this snapshot
Original location and fingerprint
experiments/theory-contracts/seam-joint-conjugation-20261015/PROOF.txt
bbea15f5ebb1dff698f1ecdfd8a18e724089c8fe9880dea684a5f9fd45cb1c8a
finding:joint-bilinear-hermitian-correction