Scoped exclusion
No time-stabilizing orthogonal repair of the fixed marking
In the question: Which partner actually belongs to the original seam?
Only fixed fold time and fixed 5+3 marking. Covariant marking transport is positively constructed; other sources or dynamical dictionaries are not excluded.
Read the exact result, assumptions and evidence
Result
After actual quarter conjugation the D5 projections of the time axis have distinct squared norms 129/256 and 137/256. Hence no orthogonal T satisfies T d_beta=d_beta and T O(P5)T^-1=P5. This excludes every Weyl correction in this fixed comparison.
Required assumptions
- Given chiral source in both quarter domains
D_alpha=-i∂theta on f(theta+2pi)=exp(2pi i alpha)f(theta), filled negative spectrum and relative particle/hole excitation time; alpha=1/4,3/4. This compares two conjugate domains, not opposite charges in one fixed domain or all P1 sources.
- Stipulated E8 quarter-fold dictionary
The existing Weyl lift M, affine E8 module, Q'=2(H3+H6) and K_alpha=L0+delta_alpha.H0 with alpha=1/4,3/4 are held fixed for comparison. This representation is not derived from P1/P2; an unbroken SM time action is not assumed.
- First 5+3 marking and Z4 character supplied
In the supplied E8 dictionary, D5 on the first five coordinates, D3 on the last three and k=2sum(p1..p5) mod4 are given for the first quarter domain. The other domain may transport these data covariantly; their original physical selection is not presumed.
Original evidence
- PROOF.txt lines 153–187
Source checked at this snapshot
Original location and fingerprint
experiments/theory-contracts/seam-joint-conjugation-20261015/PROOF.txt
bbea15f5ebb1dff698f1ecdfd8a18e724089c8fe9880dea684a5f9fd45cb1c8a
finding:joint-fixed-time-marking-repair-excluded