Established in scope
Actual quarter conjugation transports the supplied marking
In the question: Which partner actually belongs to the original seam?
Exact map of the supplied source and conditional E8 lift; first marking, source realization and physical event law are not derived from P1/P2. Both quarter domains remain explicit; no switch to another branch to solve a fixed-sector question.
Read the exact result, assumptions and evidence
Result
n→−n−1 forces j→7−j and O=−MRM^T with O(x)=(x4,−x5,−x6,x1,−x2,−x3,x8,x7). O d_alpha=d_(1−alpha); P5_beta=O P5_alpha O^-1 and k_beta=k_alpha∘O^-1 need no new marking choice. Sea state and positive time are transported; the E8 current lift assumes the existing extension.
Required assumptions
- Given chiral source in both quarter domains
D_alpha=-i∂theta on f(theta+2pi)=exp(2pi i alpha)f(theta), filled negative spectrum and relative particle/hole excitation time; alpha=1/4,3/4. This compares two conjugate domains, not opposite charges in one fixed domain or all P1 sources.
- Stipulated E8 quarter-fold dictionary
The existing Weyl lift M, affine E8 module, Q'=2(H3+H6) and K_alpha=L0+delta_alpha.H0 with alpha=1/4,3/4 are held fixed for comparison. This representation is not derived from P1/P2; an unbroken SM time action is not assumed.
- First 5+3 marking and Z4 character supplied
In the supplied E8 dictionary, D5 on the first five coordinates, D3 on the last three and k=2sum(p1..p5) mod4 are given for the first quarter domain. The other domain may transport these data covariantly; their original physical selection is not presumed.
Original evidence
- PROOF.txt lines 80–187
Source checked at this snapshot
Original location and fingerprint
experiments/theory-contracts/seam-joint-conjugation-20261015/PROOF.txt
bbea15f5ebb1dff698f1ecdfd8a18e724089c8fe9880dea684a5f9fd45cb1c8a
finding:joint-quarter-transports-marking