Established in scope
C0 does not hide charged intermediate sectors
In the question: Which seam action distinguishes native opposite charges?
Balanced W remain within the sector; T insertion/removal responses require Cp. No derived physical measuring instrument.
Read the exact result, assumptions and evidence
Result
η·Qtot is zero on C0. T_p enters Cp; full propagation yields ratio exp(−2tη·p). For v=Bp, conditionally η=Bᵀδ. Only the odd factor is matched.
Required assumptions
- Full original charge-field source
Finite Round20 lattice/scalar space with the original bilinear E8 cocycle, complete integer charges, onsite T and balanced W, coercive quadratic Hdiag and supplied hopping. No P1/P2 selection or local chiral field identification is presumed.
- Chemical comparison with charged intermediate sectors
Additionally supplied Hη=H+η·Qtot, C-invariant initial density in C0 and full propagation after onsite T moves C0 into Cp. η is comparison input, not a derived seam parameter.
Original evidence
- PROOF.md lines 1–178
Source checked at this snapshot
Original location and fingerprint
experiments/theory-contracts/native-charged-conjugation-20261015/PROOF.md
db1da5ce443535c1972bb93314f4478a1e0627b0a0524501d4166f41feb56024
finding:native-chemical-mark-visible-in-charged-corners