Skip to main content

Read the result in its research context.

Follow the published construction into its registered claims, then explore reviewed research questions, attempts and the connections that remain open.

Scoped exclusion

Original root-response sum also leaks from code

In the question: Historical: common source, state and event selection

Original sum and coherent profiles with unchanged moduli; no physically selected execution or code-closure theorem for arbitrary new weights. Prior complete positive-profile erasure trace gap remains separately valid. Other higher source histories are not excluded.

Read the exact result, assumptions and evidence

Result

For unchanged original unrenormalized root-input basis, Lsum=sum_beta S_beta* S_beta and <q,Lsum f0>=-2092/sqrt3 with leakage norm²>=4376464/3. All4 original family omissions give same exact witness. Independent targeted original-data check confirms35736-343776/4=-50208 for unnormalized witness. Full coherent S* S sum has additional charged cross terms, which vanish exactly in neutral q/f0 matrix element. Thus coherent profiles with |a_beta|=1 also fail code closure regardless of phases.

Required assumptions

  • Given local E8_1 vacuum representation and explicit cocycle

    Positive level-one E8 lattice vacuum representation in orthonormal D5+D3 coordinates, declared simple-root cocycle, level-one Heisenberg Ward rules and internal quarter character v=(0^5,1/2^3). Insertions are separated. No raw-P1 pullback or physical time law is assumed or derived from this representation.

  • Actual native G31 event representation

    Use the actual original Hamming/E8/J matrices and60 reflections, their four-dimensional action, characteristic P64=O2(G31), and existing S6 quotient. These are accepted mathematical core data, not a physical source derived from P1 in this round.

  • Symmetric quartic and actual erasure intertwiner

    Use Sym^4 of the native four-representation, the actual five codeword sums, and the existing one-register erasure intertwiner. The symmetric tensor rule and its physical selection are not silently inferred from the full tensor product.

  • Actual positive Cartan quartic Fock embedding

    Use original Construction-A roots with physical metric dot/2 and u_j=(h_2j-i h_2j+1)/sqrt2 as J=+i basis. Canonically embed the actual five Sym^4 code support sums as neutral grade4 Heisenberg polynomials in the given E8_1 lattice vacuum. No physical preparation follows.

  • Original neutral root-pair moment fields

    Use existing E8_1 neutral_source_response reader:64 chirally selected roots, original omission of one SU4 family weight line, B48=12T_E8+R_neut, AR=4P_A2-8P_U1. Family omission is an explicit existing input, not derived here from P1; neither it nor the R port or physical coupling is newly selected.

  • Original displayed J-equivariant root isometry

    Use existing S=_SIMPLE and T=_TARGET_SIMPLE from cartan_source._glue_deck_character_certificate: O=T S^-1/sqrt2 maps actual Construction-A roots r/sqrt2 to original Chevalley roots r/2, preserving metric and J. This is the existing concrete map, not a newly fitted embedding; physical P1 selection stays separate.

  • Original positive adjoint two-insertion response

    Compute o(W_beta), W_beta=E_beta,0 R_neut, with unchanged original real transverse v_beta. Ordered return is positive Fock Gram o(W)*o(W) between code or original trimer states without intermediate projection. Allow W=sum a_beta W_beta for arbitrary complex input coefficients; distinct lattice charges force nonnegative weights |a_beta|². Nonadjoint returns, other complex transverse fields, longer histories or physical instruments are not thereby selected.

Original evidence

  • SOURCE-ERASURE-WARD-AND-CODE-CLOSURE.md lines 111–137

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    experiments/theory-contracts/joint-native-algebra-selection-20261016/SOURCE-ERASURE-WARD-AND-CODE-CLOSURE.md

    b365eebb2d5419fdf6306d2a41d8ae40bb538b5b195e01ccec91636c1fc8cd38

finding:original-root-response-sum-also-leaks-from-code