Established in scope
Both finite W-bridge premises are derived
In the question: Shared explanation of c3, P1 and P2 with recovered premise closures
QWZ2+1D times regular mu4 module; Bismut-Freed and continuum identification are not established thereby. AX.P2.01 remains declared.
Read the exact result, assumptions and evidence
Result
v1014 closes P-anch by the winding/triple lock; v1015 closes P-dem in the finite factorized abelian collar with r=(1,1,1), zero residual at sizes12,16 and countercontrols. Finite axiom core is zero modulo externalized MMST identification.
Required assumptions
- P1/P2 remain declared starting axioms
This program checks which additional source, state, event, and observable structures follow from accepted TFPT principles; it does not revoke or replace P1/P2.
- Do not identify source types
Observable algebra, OS reflection, state, collar operator, time evolution, carrier connection, family holonomy, and readout are distinct data until an original map relates them.
- Model results remain conditional
Calculations in a fixed E8 net, quotient, family packet, or readout apply only under their stated inputs and do not select those inputs.
Original evidence
- v1015_axiom_core_closure.py lines 1–37
Source checked at this snapshot
Original location and fingerprint
verification/v1015_axiom_core_closure.py
ff1db6a6cde86bbea64ef04c6e56d3bc799bf6d676b8a820b2f35632acd59229
- 019-source.tex lines 243–279
Source checked at this snapshot
Original location and fingerprint
documents/tfpt_research_contracts/sections/019-source.tex
bc848971a13fc0618e7d1b3431e68ec78b6c7b34709b008dc84695f9a2f81a2f
finding:shared-origin-finite-w-bridge-closed-with-continuum-fence