Established in scope
Shared seam geometry explains numerical data through typed steps
In the question: Shared explanation of c3, P1 and P2 with recovered premise closures
Common conditional explanation within the named geometry and connection classes; no input-free selection of the full source tuple.
Read the exact result, assumptions and evidence
Result
P1 supplies the primitive oriented RP kernel with unit winding; c3 is its normalization. Four-mark geometry and the typed connection yield three cycles, five meromorphic functions and anchor(1,1,2), hence e1=4,e2=5,e3=2 and c3=1/(8pi). Physical 3+2 identification remains a separate map.
Required assumptions
- P1/P2 remain declared starting axioms
This program checks which additional source, state, event, and observable structures follow from accepted TFPT principles; it does not revoke or replace P1/P2.
- Do not identify source types
Observable algebra, OS reflection, state, collar operator, time evolution, carrier connection, family holonomy, and readout are distinct data until an original map relates them.
- Model results remain conditional
Calculations in a fixed E8 net, quotient, family packet, or readout apply only under their stated inputs and do not select those inputs.
Original evidence
- C3-P1-P2-SHARED-ORIGIN-20261105.md lines 1–91
Source checked at this snapshot
Original location and fingerprint
experiments/theory-contracts/original-paper-source-reconciliation-20261102/C3-P1-P2-SHARED-ORIGIN-20261105.md
23a2de08399056f9fe77d1e230a96c926c9fdb5dc7451a7909704bb3a1f02bf2
- 013-c3-p1-p2-origin.tex lines 1–46
Source checked at this snapshot
Original location and fingerprint
documents/tfpt_1_architecture_e8/sections/013-c3-p1-p2-origin.tex
0d62b3c8644ad807513b9468aa99ee8fbacc182662b666201d96fc36c5ba5b85
finding:shared-origin-structured-p1-c3-and-p2-are-distinct-levels