A registered result in its source context
Original ledger classification: Koide source->pole: standard QED running EXCLUDED (wrong sign) -- the transfer is the non-QED 53/54 operator/Moebius generator [E]/[C]
Recorded statement: Track 3 (2026-06-23, F_transfer): the Koide source->pole transfer as a TYPED solver -- promotes experiments/ftransfer/koide_source_to_pole into the ledger with a kill test. Does NOT re-prove the 53/54 operator factor (v183, [E]) or Q*=2/3…
Statement, assumptions and sources
Paper context: Frontier and open physical interfaces
The exact identifier, original classification and full claim are available below.
The source wording and classification below are preserved as recorded. A paper link, shared script or authored topic relation does not upgrade the claim or report a new proof run. Read later reviewed findings separately.
Read the exact registered claim and its dependencies
FR.POLE.SOLVE.01
Original ledger classification: Koide source->pole: standard QED running EXCLUDED (wrong sign) -- the transfer is the non-QED 53/54 operator/Moebius generator [E]/[C]
Original claim text
Track 3 (2026-06-23, F_transfer): the Koide source->pole transfer as a TYPED solver -- promotes experiments/ftransfer/koide_source_to_pole into the ledger with a kill test. Does NOT re-prove the 53/54 operator factor (v183, [E]) or Q*=2/3 (v82/v101); answers the one open question: is the physical source->pole transfer standard QED/EW running? A clean NEGATIVE. [E] Q_pole=Koide(PDG poles)=2/3 to 3e-6; Q_src(phi0-ladder, v93)=0.6644638 (0.33% below 2/3). [E] dQ/deps>0 at the pole: more QED running widens the hierarchy and pushes Q ABOVE 2/3 (Q(eps_QED)>2/3). [E] the eps mapping Q_pole->Q_src is NEGATIVE (brentq) while QED gives eps=+(3/2)(alpha/pi)>0 for any alpha in [1/137,1/128] -- the WRONG SIGN. [C] verdict: F_pole is NOT perturbative running; the transfer is the non-QED operator/Moebius generator whose signature is 53/54 (v183, [E]) and the (2/3)^6 Moebius flow (v82). Stays [C], sharper -- plain running is the kill (excluded).
Original classification detail
[E] the Koide coincidence + the QED-wrong-way sign + the negative required eps (PDG poles + exact ladder ratios, no fit); [C] the verdict that the true transfer is the non-QED generator. A typed solver with a kill test; does NOT promote Q_pole to [E].
Dependencies as recorded
FR.POLE.01; v183; v82; v93; v101
Open the original ledger source, row 83Location recorded in the ledger
These document locations are recorded directly on the ledger row. They are document level navigation, rather than a newly inferred section citation.
- Frontier and open physical interfaces
Sections that explicitly cite this claim
A literal claim identifier is present in these paper sections. The section and its premises determine what the citation supports.
- 2026-06-23 (Track 3 — the [formula in source] functor promoted from contracts to TYPED runnable solvers with kill tests: Koide source [formula in source] pole ( v371), [formula in source] Boltzmann ( v372), axion finite- [formula in source] relic ( v373), [formula in source] uncertainty budget ( v374))Research changelog; TFPT — Introduction and reading guide
Navigation through a shared verification script
These sections cite a script associated with the claim. This is a source navigation join, rather than an explicit citation of the claim or a theorem equivalence.
- Status: what is now written out, and what is honestly leftStandard Model and flavor structure
- Closing computations and proofstfpt 2 standard model
- The closure ledger: what is done, and what genuinely remainsTFPT — Introduction and reading guide
- Status: what is now written out, and what is honestly lefttfpt 2 standard model
- 2026-06-23 (Status propagation: the v365– v380 [formula in source] FORM.SEAM.MMST.01 status carried into the remaining papers, the README and the Zenodo description)Research changelog; TFPT — Introduction and reading guide
- 2026-06-24 (Typed correction budget: v388 the gap correction is keyed to the mechanism class, not a uniform band)Research changelog; TFPT — Introduction and reading guide
- -1.2cm TFPT — Research Contracts for the Remaining Interfaces:\\v_ geo [formula in source] G_ net [formula in source] F_ transfer [formula in source] (U_ wall) [formula in source] (G_ metric) [formula in source] [formula in source] / _1/ _2/ _3 [formula in source] next)tfpt research contracts
- The hard reduction: the live residual as typed interfacesTFPT — Introduction and reading guide
All 19 linked sections
- The honest open-items list
- 2026-06-25 (F_pole external: the Koide source [formula in source] pole transfer is one-loop EM: v420)
- 2026-06-23 (Bird's-eye synthesis: two new structural patterns — v383 the universal spectral-gap principle and v384 the residual is certification, not construction)
- Front matter / support
- The honest open-items list
- The honest open-items list
- Summary
- Front matter / support
- Closing computations and proofs
- -1.2cm TFPT — Research Contracts for the Remaining Interfaces:\\v_ geo [formula in source] G_ net [formula in source] F_ transfer [formula in source] (U_ wall) [formula in source] (G_ metric) [formula in source] [formula in source] / _1/ _2/ _3 [formula in source] next)
- Front matter / support
Registered verification modules
- v371_ftransfer_pole.pyRegistered verification module · frontier
Read the description recorded in the module registry
Track 3 (F_transfer): the Koide source->pole transfer as a typed solver -- promotes the experiments/ftransfer solve into the ledger with a kill test (does NOT re-prove 53/54 v183 or Q*=2/3 v82/v101). [E] Q_pole=Koide(PDG poles)=2/3 to 3e-6, Q_src(phi0-ladder)=0.66446 (0.33% below). [E] QED runs the wrong way: dQ/deps>0 pushes Q ABOVE 2/3; the eps mapping Q_pole->Q_src is NEGATIVE while QED gives eps=+(3/2)(alpha/pi)>0 -- wrong sign for any alpha in [1/137,1/128]. [C] verdict: F_pole is NOT standard QED running; the transfer is the non-QED 53/54 operator / (2/3)^6 Moebius generator (v183/v82). Stays [C], plain running excluded as the kill.
A registered module is a source reference. Its presence does not assert that the module was executed in this snapshot.