Skip to main content

Results, with their exact scope.

The complete active claim ledger and the eligible source reviewed research findings, including conditional achievements and precise negative results. The original statement, premises and status remain attached.

Research snapshot 2026-11-02 · 783 active ledger claims · 696 scientific findings · 707 registered scripts. These are different inventories, not counts of independent physical confirmations.

What does this inventory cover?

Every one of the 783 active ledger IDs is included. All 788 ledger rows, including superseded rows, remain in the download. The reviewed research corpus contains 697 findings; 1 administrative record is excluded from public scientific content, with the omission recorded in the coverage file.

The scientific findings include 505 established scoped results, 63 conditional results and 128 scoped exclusions. These labels describe the recorded finding. They do not upgrade its parent physical goal or overwrite the original ledger.

Sources were matched to their recorded hashes and line ranges at this snapshot. Bounded text excerpts make sources available even when a source is not in the earlier public release. Any omitted administrative lines are explicitly marked. This is source coverage, not a new execution of Python, Lean or Wolfram proofs.

Atlas revision 3ddcc9643e499ce39900d9c5 · snapshot SHA256 7622b36de7ed79901ae75361b009fa423a6505076f388f4fbaf2d42e1ba7dcf5

92 matching records · page 1 of 5

Original ledger status

GATE.UWALL.04

GATE.UWALL.04

(U_wall) harmonic metric = FINITE linear algebra, NOT a transcendental Hitchin PDE: polystable point is unitary (Mehta-Seshadri) => Phi=0, harmonic metric = constant invariant form H. Explicit bundle: raw M_k non-unitary (||M^dag M-I||~0.83) but UNIQUE invariant Hermitian form H (null dim 1) is POSITIVE-DEFINITE => unitarisable; unitarised M~_k=H^{1/2}M_k H^{-1/2} unitary (1e-8), cusp class, prod=I, clean elements {0,1/2,1/sqrt2}. So v31 'transcendental Hitchin' applies only to generic Higgs locus; at the selected point R(rho) reduces to finite unitarisation + combinatorial R (closed). RESIDUAL: final c_u/c_d needs the quark leg/hexagon-site composition; not fabricated

Recorded status: Numerical (Hitchin reduced to finite)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: Numerical (Hitchin reduced to finite)

Dependencies: GATE.UWALL.03; v31; v33; Mehta-Seshadri

Scripts: v40_harmonic_metric.py

Location: tfpt_research_contracts

Original CSV, line 64

Original ledger status

SEAM.EQUIV.CONTINUUM.03

SEAM.EQUIV.CONTINUUM.03

DIRECTION A (2026-06-23): the continuum chain of SEAM.EQUIV.01 assembled theorem-by-theorem, with the residual reduced to ONE lattice-realization input tied to the seam's one-sidedness (the c3 origin). After the reverse-audit/bandwidth work showed no hidden DISCRETE lever remains, the only fundamental progress is to assemble the CONTINUUM chain -- which this does. THE CHAIN: S1 the gapped (Delta=6 ln(3/2)>0, v302) quasi-free (CAR, v155/v160) 16-Majorana collar -> S2 invertible (a gapped free-fermion 2+1D phase has no intrinsic topological order, Kitaev, v301) -> S3 the NONTRIVIAL invertible phase (c_-=8!=0), not the trivial c_-=0 one -> S4 a NON-gappable anomalous chiral edge (anomaly inflow / bulk-edge: a nontrivial invertible phase cannot have a gapped edge), so edge EXISTENCE is a CONSEQUENCE of S2+S3, NOT a separate assumption -- this directly reduces the v336/v351 'does the gapped collar HAVE a chiral edge?' residual -> S5 the edge is 16 chiral Majoranas whose chiral-CFT scaling limit is given by MMST (Morinelli-Morsella-Stottmeister-Tanimoto, v336; range rank<=c<=D = 8<=8<=16, IN range) -> S6 the order-4 mu4 clock selects the index-4 net (E8)_1 (v351) and the AQFT stack invertible->trivial center->holomorphic->(E8)_1 is cited (v297, LIT-A/B/C). [C] the MMST range; [C] edge-existence-from-invertibility (anomaly inflow); [C] chirality = one-sidedness = the c3 ORIGIN: c_-!=0 is the seam being one-sided, the SAME one-sidedness that makes c3=1/(8pi) a one-sided Gauss-Bonnet (|Z2| oint K, oint K=4pi on S^2; v58/v73); [E] the chain closes modulo S3 (the only non-theorem link); [O] the ONE remaining input -- the abstract collar realized as a genuine LATTICE chiral free-fermion invertible phase (the v297 Flat-Away). NET: SEAM.EQUIV.01 reduced to one realization input tied to the constant that DEFINES the theory; ADVANCES, does not close. SEPARATELY, Direction B (the U_wall Hitchin selector) was found ALREADY closed by v40: at the polystable point Mehta-Seshadri makes the bundle unitary, so the harmonic metric is the constant invariant Hermitian form (finite linear algebra) with Higgs Phi=0 -- NOT a transcendental PDE -- and det R=8 is read off; only the absolute amplitude U_point (an anchor) remains. No new B module was shipped (a redundant v357 was built, found to duplicate/contradict v40, and deleted).

Recorded status: Continuum chain assembly [C]/[E]/[O] (edge-existence reduced via anomaly inflow; residual = lattice realization tied to seam one-sidedness; B already closed by v40)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: [C] the MMST range + edge-existence-from-invertibility + chirality=one-sidedness=c3-origin; [E] chain-closes-modulo-S3; [O] the one lattice-realization input. A genuine assembly reducing SEAM.EQUIV.01 to one realization input tied to the seam one-sidedness; does NOT close it. Direction B found already closed by v40 (harmonic metric = finite linear algebra, not a PDE); no redundant B module shipped.

Dependencies: SEAM.EQUIV.01; v301; v302; v336; v351; v297; v58; v40

Scripts: v356_continuum_mmst_applicability.py

Location: tfpt_research_contracts

Original CSV, line 77

Original ledger status

COSMO.NSTAR.01

COSMO.NSTAR.01

N_star band -> POINT [P] (the announced 'future derivation from a reheating model' executed; demotion of N_star as a compiler output STANDS): the only compiler input is M_scal=c3^{7/2}Mbar=3.0600e13 GeV [I] (v28/v36/v80); everything downstream is imported standard physics - scalaron width Gamma=N_eff M^3/(48pi Mbar^2) with N_eff=4 (SM Higgs doublet; Starobinsky/Vilenkin/Gorbunov-Panin), reheating at H=Gamma => T_reh=(30 rho/(pi^2 g*))^{1/4}=9.55e9 GeV (g*=106.75), pivot matching with w=0 scalaron oscillations + entropy conservation on the EXACT Starobinsky potential V=(3/4)M^2 Mbar^2(1-e^{-sqrt(2/3)phi})^2. RESULT: N_star(k=0.05/Mpc)=51.44 => n_s=1-2/N_star=0.9611, r=12/N_star^2=0.00454. CROSS-CHECK: k=0.002/Mpc gives N_star=54.7 = the known R^2-reheating literature value (~54). ROBUSTNESS: channel ambiguity N_eff=1..100 moves N_star by <0.8 e-folds (log sensitivity); instantaneous-reheating upper bound N_star<=55.7. FREEZE DISCIPLINE: 51.4 lies inside the frozen registry band [50,60]; predictions_frozen.json NOT modified (v84 lock intact). HONEST TENSIONS RECORDED: (1) n_s=0.9611 is +0.90 sigma below Planck 2018 (0.9649+-0.0042) and increases the DESI-combined tension; (2) A_s COHERENCE is sharper: with M_scal fixed A_s=N^2 c3^7/(24pi^2) is also predicted, A_s(51.44)=1.764e-9 = -11.4 sigma vs Planck 2.105(30)e-9; the A_s-preferred N_star=56.20 exceeds even the instantaneous-reheating bound 55.61 by 0.59 e-folds (instantaneous gives 2.06e-9 = -1.5 sigma, compatible) => within standard physics the measured A_s REQUIRES near-instantaneous reheating and the slow Higgs-channel point is A_s-disfavoured. The [P] point is CONDITIONAL on the decay channel; the frozen band [50,60] remains the prediction surface of record. Kill criteria: robust n_s>=0.967 falsifies the reheating chain (not the [I]/[L] core); A_s already arbitrates between fast and slow reheating

Recorded status: Physical [P] (conditional on M_Star=M_scal + standard reheating)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: Physical [P]: N_star=51.4 point inside the frozen band; demotion as compiler output stands

Dependencies: GRAV.SCAL.01 (M_scal); PRED.LAYER.01; REG.FREEZE.01

Scripts: v86_nstar_reheating.py

Location: origin_theory;tfpt_2;introduction

Original CSV, line 160

Original ledger status

EM.BUDGET.02

EM.BUDGET.02

PYRATE GAUGE CROSS-CHECK (independent third-party confirmation of EM.BUDGET.01/CAR.SM.01 and an F_transfer gauge-input check): the carrier/SM field content gives, by the textbook one-loop formula in GUT normalisation, (b1,b2,b3)=(41/10,-19/6,-7) [I]; (1) THREE INDEPENDENT PATHS to b1=41/10 - carrier algebra 10 b1 = g_car 2^{g_car-2}+1 = 41 (CAR.SM.01), the SM U(1) hypercharge index sum (3/5)Y^2 over the content, and the RGE generator PyR@TE 3 (arXiv:2007.12700) which writes beta_g1 = (41/10) g1^3 verbatim - all agree; (2) the M=41 decomposition 10 b1 = 40 (fermion U(1) index = sum_{f,j} L_{f,j}) + 1 (one Higgs doublet N_Phi) reproduces tfpt_2 Gate 1 exactly [I]; (3) PyR@TE also writes beta_g2 = -19/6 g2^3, beta_g3 = -7 g3^3 and the full standard 2-loop SM gauge matrix (evidence verification/pyrate/sm_gauge_betas.txt, regenerated by verification/pyrate/reproduce.sh) [I]. SCOPE [P]: confirms the gauge sector of the F_transfer functor (its running inputs are not free knobs but follow from the carrier content); PyR@TE is the right external tool for the transfer/RGE gates (gauge running, and - with a seesaw model - the neutrino-Yukawa running behind eta_B), NOT for premise (A) (a 2d boundary-CFT question)

Recorded status: Identity [I] (one-loop coefficients exact) + [P] (F_transfer gauge inputs)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: Identity [I]: carrier content -> (41/10,-19/6,-7); PyR@TE 3 (external) reproduces them verbatim; F_transfer gauge inputs confirmed

Dependencies: EM.BUDGET.01; CAR.SM.01; v2_carrier_pascal.py; v13_open_gates.py

Scripts: v159_pyrate_gauge_crosscheck.py

Location: tfpt_2

Original CSV, line 248

Original ledger status

HIGGS.FREESEAM.01

HIGGS.FREESEAM.01

HIGGS QUARTIC FROM THE FREE SEAM (a derived boundary condition tying m_H to premise (A); validated at two loops): the seam UV is the free chiral c=8 fixed point (v157/v158, Gaussian, no relevant/marginal interactions), so the one marginal SM scalar coupling vanishes at the seam -- lambda(M_seam)=0 AND beta_lambda(M_seam)=0, the Shaposhnikov-Wetterich double-criticality, here MOTIVATED by the free seam rather than assumed. (1) FREENESS SIGNATURE [I]: integrating the PyR@TE-sourced 2-loop SM RGEs from M_Z up with the measured (m_H=125.25, m_t) gives lambda(Mbar) ~ 0.002 and beta_lambda(Mbar) ~ 0 at the reduced Planck mass -- the celebrated SM near-criticality, now EXPLAINED as a consequence of the free seam (2-loop sharpens lambda(Mbar) from ~0.022 at 1-loop to ~0.002, i.e. the BC is met to ~0.2%); (2) PREDICTION [P]: the double condition lambda=beta_lambda=0 predicts m_H ~ 129-134 GeV (band, m_t/alpha_s-sensitive) with m_t pole ~ 171-176 GeV; measured (125.25, 172.5) sits a few GeV below the stability boundary -- the known slight metastability, near-criticality realised; (3) SCALE SELECTION [I]: the same condition at the scalaron scale (c3^{7/2} Mbar ~ 3e13 GeV) gives m_H ~ 107 GeV (too low), so the free-seam BC lives at the reduced Planck scale Mbar, consistent with seam = horizon = Planck, not the lower scalaron. Fills the Higgs-sector gap (previously only N_Phi=1). Python-only (numerical 2-loop running; betas PyR@TE-sourced, sm_higgs_betas.txt)

Recorded status: Identity [I] (freeness signature + scale selection) + [P] (the m_H prediction band)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: Identity [I]: free seam => lambda(Mbar)~0=beta_lambda (SM near-criticality explained); [P] m_H ~ 129-134 predicted; seam BC at the Planck scale

Dependencies: EM.BUDGET.02; GATE.METRIC.15; v158_fixed_point_stable.py; v159_pyrate_gauge_crosscheck.py

Scripts: v166_higgs_free_seam.py

Location: tfpt_4_frontier

Original CSV, line 251

Original ledger status

CONTRACT.QFT4D.01

CONTRACT.QFT4D.01

4D LAGRANGIAN VIA THE SPECTRAL ACTION (2026-06-17): the honest CONTRACT for the Phase-3 structural gap (the 2d chiral seam net v156/v175 + its dynamics v238-v243 -> the physical 4d theory). The natural TFPT bridge is NOT a holographic guess but Connes' spectral action: a SINGLE Dirac operator whose spectral action Tr f(D/Lambda) yields gravity AND the matter (gauge+Higgs) Lagrangian. The gravity half is verified (v36: R+R^2); this types the matter half as a contract and checks the arithmetic pieces. (1) [E] carrier spinor = one generation: carrier D5(+)A3 = SO(10)xSO(6) (=SO(16) grading, v156); the SO(10) half-spinor = dim S^+ = 2^(g_car-1) = 16 = one SM generation (15 Weyl fermions + nu_R), N_fam = 3 -- the carrier carries the SM matter representation. (2) [E] SM gauge group inside the carrier: SU(3)xSU(2)xU(1) (rank 4, dim 12) in SU(5) (rank 4, dim 24) in SO(10)=D5 (rank 5, dim 45); color SU(3) also in A3=SU(4) (Pati-Salam, dim 15); rank(D5)+rank(A3)=8=rank E8. (3) [E] one Dirac operator -> gravity + matter: the Seeley-DeWitt expansion gives a2~R (Einstein-Hilbert) and a4~(R^2, Weyl^2, F_{mu nu}F^{mu nu} Yang-Mills, |D phi|^2 Higgs); gravity half machine-verified (v36), Yang-Mills a4 standard Gilkey. (4) [X] falsifiable hooks: spectral-action boundary relations g3=g2=sqrt(5/3)g1 and a Higgs-quartic relation (Chamseddine-Connes-Marcolli). (5) [O] CONTRACT.QFT4D.01 obligations: (i) the seam induces the SM Dirac operator D; (ii) the finite NCG geometry = the carrier algebra (FORM.P2.02); (iii) the spectral action of D reproduces the measured SM couplings under the v36 gravity normalisation -> then the 4d SM+gravity Lagrangian is an OUTPUT. The genuine Phase-3 target, NOT closed

Recorded status: Contract [O] (with [E] arithmetic + [X] hooks)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: [E] carrier half-spinor = one SM generation (16), SM gauge group embeds in the carrier, one Dirac operator gives gravity (v36) + matter (Gilkey); [X] unification + Higgs hooks; [O] CONTRACT.QFT4D.01: the spectral action of the seam Dirac operator = 4d SM+gravity Lagrangian -- the Phase-3 target, not closed

Dependencies: FORM.P2.02; QG.G2.01; DHR.SECTORS.01

Scripts: v244_spectral_action_contract.py

Location: tfpt_research_contracts

Original CSV, line 330

Original ledger status

QFT4D.MATTER.01

QFT4D.MATTER.01

SPECTRAL-ACTION MATTER CONTENT (2026-06-17): the computable core of CONTRACT.QFT4D.01 (v244) -- the NCG matter representation, discharging the representation-theory + tree-relation core to [E] and leaving only the seam->Dirac realisation and the measured-coupling reproduction as the open residual. The carrier half-spinor is the SO(10) 16 (dim S^+ = 2^(g_car-1) = 16). One generation = SO(10) 16 = SU(5)(10+5bar+1) = SM: Q=(3,2)_{1/6}, u^c=(3bar,1)_{-2/3}, e^c=(1,1)_{1}, L=(1,2)_{-1/2}, d^c=(3bar,1)_{1/3}, nu^c=(1,1)_{0}. (1) [E] 16 = one generation: SM multiplet dims sum to 6+3+1+2+3+1 = 16 = dim S^+, N_fam=3 (15 SM Weyl fermions + a right-handed neutrino). (2) [E] electric charges Q=T3+Y are exactly the SM values (quarks +2/3,-1/3; anti-quarks -2/3,+1/3; leptons 0,-1; e^c +1; nu^c 0) -- the hypercharges are forced by the SO(10) embedding. (3) [E] anomaly-free: all four gauge anomalies cancel exactly over the 16: sum Y = 0, sum Y^3 = 0, [SU(2)]^2 U(1) = 0, [SU(3)]^2 U(1) = 0. (4) [E] spectral-action unification: sin^2 th_W = (sum T3^2)/(sum Q^2) = 3/8 at the spectral scale, i.e. g3=g2=sqrt(5/3)g1 (Chamseddine-Connes-Marcolli). (5) [E] Higgs = the (1,2)_{1/2} off-diagonal part of the finite Dirac operator (inner fluctuation), one SM doublet. (6) [O] residual: (i) the seam induces the Dirac operator D and (iii) the spectral action reproduces the MEASURED couplings after RG running -- still a contract, now with its rep-theory core verified

Recorded status: Numerical (exact rep theory) [E]/[O]

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: [E] SO(10) 16 = one anomaly-free SM generation with correct hypercharges/charges; sin^2 th_W = 3/8 (g3=g2=sqrt(5/3)g1); Higgs = (1,2)_{1/2} inner fluctuation. [O] the seam->Dirac realisation + measured-coupling reproduction stay the open contract

Dependencies: CONTRACT.QFT4D.01; FORM.P2.02

Scripts: v245_spectral_matter_content.py

Location: tfpt_research_contracts

Original CSV, line 331

Original ledger status

PS.E8BRANCH.01

PS.E8BRANCH.01

E8 HULL FORBIDS THE 126 (2026-06-17): the E8 audit hull supplies exactly {1,10,16,45} for SO(10) -- turning the scalaron-match '16-Higgs over 126-Higgs' selection into an algebraic statement. The carrier D5(+)A3 = SO(10)xSU(4) is a rank-8 subalgebra of E8 via SO(16); the adjoint 248 branches as (45,1)+(1,15)+(10,6)+(16,4)+(16bar,4bar) = 45+15+60+64+64 = 248 (SO(16) split: 120 adjoint + 128 spinor = spinor_SO10 (x) spinor_SO6). (1) [E] ranks 5+3=8=rank E8. (2) [E] dims sum to 248. (3) [E] the SO(10) reps in the hull are exactly {1,10,16,45}; the 126 (dim 126) is ABSENT -> the renormalisable 126_H is algebraically forbidden if fields are E8-hull reps, and 10+16+45 is E8-supplied, not fitted. (4) [E] MULTIPLICITY CAVEAT: only ONE (45,1) and ONE (1,15) in the 248 -> the minimal E8-allowed content (one 45) is proton-MARGINAL, a sharp falsifiable constraint. (5) [O] the field-content principle ('TFPT fields are E8-hull reps') + the NCG inner-fluctuation complement (v250).

Recorded status: Lattice/rep theory [E]

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: [E] E8->SO(10)xSU(4) branching: SO(10) content {1,10,16,45}, 126 absent (126_H forbidden), only one 45/15 (proton-marginal); [O] the field-content principle

Dependencies: E8.GLU.01; QFT4D.MATTER.01

Scripts: v247_e8_branching_no126.py

Location: tfpt_research_contracts

Original CSV, line 333

Original ledger status

PS.RGTEST.01

PS.RGTEST.01

CARRIER-NATIVE PATI-SALAM/SO(10) UNIFICATION KILL-TEST + NEGATIVE CONTROLS (2026-06-17): the suite claim-check of experiments/gauge-unification. Two-step M_Z->(SM)->M_PS->(PS)->M_GUT (SO(10): a4=a2L=a2R), matching a4=a3, a2L=a2, a2R^-1=(5/3)a1^-1-(2/3)a3^-1. (1) [E] matching holds and a valid 1-loop unification solution exists (M_PS < M_GUT < M_Pl). (2) [X] NEG: pure SM running does NOT unify (residual spread ~8.8 at 2e16 GeV, the universal non-SUSY gap). (3) [C] SCALE COINCIDENCE: the unifying M_PS lands on the scalaron scale M_s=c3^(7/2)Mbar -- M_PS/M_s = 1.0-1.7 at 1-loop (experiment 2-loop shrinks to ~1.0-1.2); two independent TFPT scales (gauge unification + gravitational scalaron) coincide. (4) [X] NEG: 126-type (10,1,3) content (large SU(2)_R, b2R>0) yields NO scalaron-matched solution (1-loop unphysical / 2-loop ~33x) -- match lost; 126 also E8-forbidden (v247). (5) [X] NEG: proton decay selects content -- minimal 16-Higgs M_GUT~2e15 -> tau_p < Super-K (2.4e34 yr) EXCLUDED; +(15,1,1) [E8-allowed 45] raises M_GUT proton-safer. (6) [O] residuals: the gauging fork, the exact kappa in M_PS=kappa M_s (now ~1.0-1.2), the one-45 E8 marginality (v247).

Recorded status: Data confrontation (kill-test) [X]/[O]

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: [E] matching+unification-exists; [X] SM-only fails, 126 breaks the match, proton decay selects content; [C] M_PS=scalaron coincidence; [O] gauging fork + exact kappa + one-45 marginality

Dependencies: PS.ALGEBRA.01; QFT4D.RGTEST.01

Scripts: v249_ps_unification.py

Location: tfpt_research_contracts

Original CSV, line 335

Original ledger status

CONTRACT.QFT4D.DIRAC.01

CONTRACT.QFT4D.DIRAC.01

THE SPECTRAL-TRIPLE CONTRACT (2026-06-17): the object that would turn 'carrier is gauged' from a fork into a theorem (Reviewer-A Theorem 3 + the sigma=scalaron identification). Target: a real even almost-commutative triple (A,H,D,J,gamma) with A_F = PS algebra (v248), H_F = 3x16, D_F = D_M (x) 1 + gamma_5 (x) D_F(R,L,phi0,Majorana). (1) [E] H_F = N_fam x dim S^+ = 3x16 = 48 (three generations of the SO(10) spinor); A_F acts on it. (2) [E] the charged-fermion Yukawas are ALREADY fixed (FLAV.QUARK.01/v18), so the open test is NCG CONSISTENCY of D_F, not 'nice Yukawas' (Reviewer A). (3) [O] the 7 NCG obligations: reality J, grading gamma, KO-dimension (6 mod 8), the FIRST-ORDER CONDITION (the historic SO(10)-NCG obstruction), orientability, Poincare duality, no-junk forms. (4) [O] sigma=SCALARON HYPOTHESIS: the Chamseddine-Connes-Mukhanov singlet sigma (rescues first-order + gives nu_R Majorana) is conjectured to BE the R+R^2 scalaron (supported by M_PS=kappa M_s, v249); CAVEAT: the scalaron<->nu_R nu_R coupling is NOT automatic and must be proven. (5) [O] inner fluctuations Omega^1_D -> Higgs content 10+16+45 not 126 (NCG complement of v247). (6) [C] verdict: reduces the '4d QFT' residual to ONE constructive object (the triple) + the finite NCG checks; gauge group (v248), matter rep (v245), Yukawas (v18) and unification corridor (v249) already in place -- what is missing is D_F + its axioms.

Recorded status: Contract [O] (with [E] finite facts)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: [E] H_F=3x16=48, Yukawas already fixed (test is NCG consistency); [O] the 7 NCG axioms (first-order condition the hard one), sigma=scalaron, inner-fluctuation Higgs content -- reduces 4d QFT to one spectral triple

Dependencies: PS.ALGEBRA.01; CONTRACT.QFT4D.01

Scripts: v250_dirac_triple_contract.py

Location: tfpt_research_contracts

Original CSV, line 336

Original ledger status

PS.NCG.FLUCT.01

PS.NCG.FLUCT.01

INNER FLUCTUATIONS Omega^1_D -> SM HIGGS DOUBLET (no 126, no junk) + sigma (2026-06-17): closes the open obligation v250 #5 (Higgs content, NOT 126), the NO-JUNK obligation, and fixes the sigma quantum numbers (v250 #4 rep-theory half). Inner fluctuation D -> D + A + eps' J A J^-1 with A = sum pi(a)[D_F,pi(b)] in Omega^1_D = span{pi(a)[D_F,pi(b)]}. Because D_F is purely chirality-odd (Yukawa L<->R + Majorana), every 1-form is odd, so the FINITE fluctuations are SCALARS (gauge bosons come from the continuum [D_M,a]). (1) [E] Omega^1_{D_F} purely chirality-odd, gauge part 0. (2) [E] NO JUNK / NO 126: for the SM algebra C(+)H(+)M_3 every 1-form has support exactly inside the Higgs-doublet pattern (chirality-odd, colour-diagonal, no quark<->lepton mixing) = the single SM Higgs doublet (1,2)_{1/2}; no colour/weak triplet, no (10,1,3)/126-type scalar (0 junk entries, machine-checked). (3) [E] sigma NEEDS BEYOND FIRST ORDER: with the SM algebra the sigma (nu_R nu_R^c Majorana) direction is NOT generated by Omega^1_D (consistent with first order HOLDING, v252) but with the Pati-Salam algebra it IS generated -- sigma is precisely the Chamseddine-Connes-van Suijlekom beyond-first-order scalar (v251/v252). (4) [E] sigma quantum numbers: SM singlet (1,1,0) with B-L=2 (nu_R has B-L=-1, so sigma*(nu_R nu_R) is gauge invariant only for B-L(sigma)=+2), giving the nu_R Majorana mass and breaking B-L (the PS (4,1,2)->SM step). (5) [C] sigma=scalaron: sigma is a real SM-singlet scalar at the B-L/PS scale, consistent in quantum numbers and scale with the R+R^2 scalaron (M_PS=kappa M_s, v249/v253); the gravitational coupling proper remains [C]/[O].

Recorded status: Numerical (NCG inner fluctuations) [E]/[C]

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: [E] finite fluctuations = SM Higgs doublet (no junk/no 126) + sigma beyond first order + sigma B-L=2 singlet; [C] sigma=scalaron; closes v250 #5 + no-junk obligation + sigma QN

Dependencies: PS.DIRAC.02; PS.DIRAC.01

Scripts: v254_inner_fluctuations.py

Location: tfpt_research_contracts

Original CSV, line 340

Original ledger status

PS.SPECACT.01

PS.SPECACT.01

SPECTRAL-ACTION HEAT-KERNEL EXPANSION (a0,a2,a4) + EXPLICIT kappa(f2/f0) (2026-06-17): closes the open obligation v252 #11 (spectral-action expansion) and makes the kappa-dependence on the cutoff moments explicit (v253 #5). The bosonic spectral action S = Tr f(D/Lambda) has the Seeley-DeWitt expansion S ~ 2 f4 Lambda^4 a0 + 2 f2 Lambda^2 a2 + f0 a4 (f4,f2 moments, f0=f(0)). (1) [E] expansion structure: a0=cosmological (N int sqrt g), a2=Einstein-Hilbert + Higgs mass, a4=Yang-Mills + Weyl^2 + R^2 + Higgs quartic + R|H|^2, with N=dim H_F=96 (Gilkey/Chamseddine-Connes). (2) [E] trace inputs a=Tr(Y+Y)=2.96, b=Tr((Y+Y)^2)=2.92, b/a^2=0.333=1/3 (top-Yukawa dominated, the Chamseddine-Connes value). (3) [E] gauge normalisation: the a4 Yang-Mills term fixes g3=g2=sqrt(5/3)g1, sin^2 thetaW=(sum T3^2)/(sum Q^2)=3/8 (cross-check v245). (4) [C] Higgs quartic: lambda(Lambda) ~ g^2 b/a^2 = g^2/3; with the sigma ingredient present (v254) this is the famous ~125 GeV (vs ~170 GeV without sigma) Higgs-mass prediction after RG running (m_H vs 125.25 GeV); exact coefficient + running cited. (5) [E] scalaron from R^2: the gravitational a4 carries a Weyl^2 + R^2 term with coefficient ~ f0 N; the R^2 spin-0 mode IS the Starobinsky scalaron, M_s its mass (R+R^2 gravity emerges from the spectral action). (6) [C] kappa made explicit: a2 carries f2 (Einstein-Hilbert), a4 carries f0 (R^2/scalaron + gauge), so kappa=M_PS/M_s=sqrt((f2/f0) c_PS/c_grav) is an explicit ratio of the two moments x traces over H_F; the RG value kappa~1.3 (v253) fixes f2/f0 to O(1). (7) [O] the exact kappa decimal and exact lambda(Lambda) need the cutoff function f fixed -- the last genuinely open input.

Recorded status: Numerical (spectral action) [E]/[C]/[O]

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: [E] Seeley-DeWitt expansion structure + trace inputs (b/a^2=1/3) + sin^2 thetaW=3/8 + scalaron from R^2; [C] Higgs quartic ~125 GeV + explicit kappa(f2/f0); [O] cutoff moments; closes v252 spectral-action obligation

Dependencies: PS.DIRAC.02; PS.KAPPA.01; CONTRACT.QFT4D.01

Scripts: v255_spectral_action_expansion.py

Location: tfpt_research_contracts

Original CSV, line 341

Original ledger status

PS.THRESHOLD.02

PS.THRESHOLD.02

EXPLICIT PATI-SALAM THRESHOLD MODEL (2026-06-18): the two-step carrier-native PS chain made explicit for the two E8-allowed contents -- minimal 16-Higgs (M_PS~4.2e13=scalaron, M_GUT~2.4e15) and +(15,1,1) (M_GUT~5.9e15) -- realising the PS.THRESHOLD.01 policy with concrete reps-at-scales and M_PS on the scalaron scale. Decides branch B together with PS.PROTON.02.

Recorded status: Numerical (two-step RG) [E]/[C]

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: [E] explicit two-step solutions (M_PS,M_GUT,alpha_GUT) for both E8-allowed contents, M_PS on the scalaron scale; [C] realises the threshold policy; selects the content via proton decay (PS.PROTON.02).

Dependencies: PS.THRESHOLD.01; PS.RGTEST.01; PS.KAPPA.01

Scripts: v266_ps_threshold_proton.py

Location: tfpt_research_contracts

Original CSV, line 358

Original ledger status

PS.PROTON.02

PS.PROTON.02

PROTON-DECAY WINDOW DECIDES BRANCH B (2026-06-18): d=6 tau_p(p->e+pi0) over the explicit thresholds -- minimal 16-Higgs tau_p~4.4e33 yr < Super-K (2.4e34) => KILLED even at the high hadronic band; +(15,1,1) [E8-allowed single 45] tau_p~1.6e35 yr > Super-K => survives now, but sits AT the Hyper-K reach (~1.4e35) => decisively falsifiable within the decade. Branch B is content-selected (must be +(15,1,1)) and Hyper-K-decisive; A (boundary-only) stays canonical. Marginal (one 45 in the hull, v247) + O(3) tau_p uncertainty.

Recorded status: Kill-test (proton decay) [X]/[C]

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: [X] minimal content killed by Super-K + Hyper-K decisive for the survivor; [C] +(15,1,1) survives now and is the only E8-allowed proton-safe content; [O] marginal (one 45) + O(3) hadronic uncertainty. Promotes branch B to a content-selected, dated-kill-test UV branch (still not the default).

Dependencies: PS.THRESHOLD.02; PS.PROTON.KILL.01; PS.E8BRANCH.01; QFT4D.FORK.01

Scripts: v266_ps_threshold_proton.py

Location: tfpt_research_contracts

Original CSV, line 359

Original ledger status

PRED.LIVE.01

PRED.LIVE.01

LIVE KILL-TEST SCORECARD OF THE RECENT ROUND'S COMPUTABLE PREDICTIONS (2026-06-18): a data-confrontation consolidation (confronts, does not add physics), each row tagged with the decisive near-term experiment. [N] PMNS angles: sin^2 th12=1/3-phi0/2=0.30675 vs NuFIT 0.303(12) [+0.31 sigma]; sin^2 th13=phi0 e^{-5/6}=0.02311 vs 0.02225(59) [+1.45 sigma]; sin^2 th23=0.5 maximal (octant-ambiguous) -- decisive JUNO/Daya-Bay/DUNE. [C] leptonic CP: J_PMNS=-0.0297 (J_max 0.0342 vs NuFIT 0.0332 ~3%), delta=240 vs NuFIT ~232(30) -- decisive DUNE/Hyper-K. [X] Sigma m_nu NO floor=0.0586 eV vs Planck+BAO<0.12, DESI~<0.072 (consistent at the edge; Sigma<0.0586 excludes the NO m1~0 spectrum) -- decisive DESI/CMB-S4. [X] proton decay tau_p(p->e+pi0)=1.55e35 yr for the E8-allowed +(15,1,1) content vs Super-K>2.4e34 (safe); minimal 16-Higgs 4.4e33 EXCLUDED -- decisive Hyper-Kamiokande (reach ~1.4e35). [N] closed readouts alpha^-1=137.0359992 (1.9 sigma known offset), Omega_b=(1-1/4pi)phi0=0.04894, birefringence beta=phi0/(4pi)=0.2424 deg -- decisive CMB birefringence. [N] all confronted rows consistent < 2 sigma; 2 sharp near-term kill tests (Sigma m_nu floor, proton decay).

Recorded status: Data confrontation [N]/[C] + [X] (two near-term kill tests)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: [N]/[C] data confrontation (pulls vs current bounds) + [X] the two sharp near-term kill tests. A consolidation/scorecard, not new physics.

Dependencies: FLAV.TH13.01; FLAV.PMNS.03; FLAV.NUSCALE.01; PS.PROTON.02; EM.FP.01

Scripts: v283_live_killtest_scorecard.py

Location: tfpt_4_frontier

Original CSV, line 378

Original ledger status

CAR.SM.ANOM.01

CAR.SM.ANOM.01

THE CARRIER HALF-SPINOR IS ONE ANOMALY-FREE SM GENERATION + THE SM RG (2026-06-21, TOE attack point 3): connects the discrete compiler to constructive 4D QFT, closing the spectrum+anomaly+beta sub-question exactly. [E] 16=Lambda^even(C^5)=1+10+5; SU(5) c SO(10): 10+5bar+1 = one SM generation (Q,u^c,d^c,L,e^c,nu^c), 16 Weyl states. [E] ANOMALY-FREE: sum Y=0, sum Y^3=0, [SU2]^2U1=0, [SU3]^2U1=0 (exact Fraction arithmetic). [E] one-loop RG from the carrier content (3 gen + 1 Higgs): (b1,b2,b3)=(41/10,-19/6,-7); b1 numerator 41 = the EM-budget integer (v3/v159), b3=-(11-2 n_f/3) with n_f=2 N_fam. [E] NEG: dropping nu^c leaves an incomplete 15!=16 multiplet; a 4th family shifts b1 off 41/10 (N_fam=3 pins the RG). [C]/[O] the full Epstein-Glaser interacting S-matrix (v269/v271/v273) and the Yukawa sector stay open. Closes the spectrum/anomaly/beta layer; not the interacting S-matrix.

Recorded status: Identity [E] (spectrum+anomaly+RG) + [C]/[O] (S-matrix)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: [E] the 16=1+10+5 decomposition + the four exact anomaly cancellations + the one-loop (b1,b2,b3)=(41/10,-19/6,-7) + the N_fam=3 RG-pinning negative controls; [C]/[O] the full EG interacting S-matrix + Yukawa. A genuine closure of the carrier->anomaly-free-SM+RG sub-question; does NOT close the interacting theory.

Dependencies: CAR.SM.01; QFT4D.SPERT.03; v273; v159

Scripts: v310_carrier_sm_anomaly.py

Location: tfpt_research_contracts

Original CSV, line 408

Original ledger status

AS.RECONCILE.01

AS.RECONCILE.01

A_s is predicted (not missing), is DIMENSIONLESS (so it does NOT define an absolute mass), and the apparent -11 sigma tension is a reheating-channel question -- reconciled with the archived old derivation (TFPT v4.5/v4.6, 2026-06-22). [E] A_s = N_star^2 (M_scal/Mbar)^2/(24 pi^2) = N_star^2 c3^7/(24 pi^2) (v86); M_scal/Mbar = c3^{7/2} = 1.2565e-5 is a PURE RATIO, so A_s carries NO absolute scale -- it pins N_star (the e-fold count), NOT M_bar => A_s does NOT define mass (No-Unit v153 stands; 'mass itself' is set by gravity M_bar = (8 pi G)^{-1/2}, the one dimensionful input). [N] the -11.4 sigma is the slow-vs-fast reheating dichotomy: slow Higgs channel N_star=51.44 -> A_s=1.764e-9 (-11.4 sigma vs Planck 2.105(30)e-9); the A_s-preferred N_star=56.2 (~ the instantaneous bound 55.6). [P] ARCHIVE COMPARISON: the old v4.5/v4.6 (07_cmb_operational_closure) used the ALGEBRAIC N_star=3/phi0-1=55.42 (+ alpha_R=(Omega_adm/4pi)e^{1/phi0}) and reported A_s=2.124e-9; at that N_star the current normalisation gives A_s=2.047e-9 (-1.9 sigma) -- consistent (~4% offset = alpha_R vs c3^7); the old clean A_s = N_star~55.4 (near-instantaneous), NOT the slow channel. [E] nothing lost: the current theory DERIVES N_star from reheating physics (more honest) and exposes that the A_s match REQUIRES fast reheating; record band N_star in [50,60] (v84). [X] decisive test: fast preheating (A_s ok, c3^{7/2} stands) OR slow reheating confirmed (exponent-7 fails).

Recorded status: Reconciliation [E]/[N]/[P]/[X] (A_s predicted+dimensionless; tension = reheating channel; archive comparison)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: [E] the dimensionless A_s formula + the no-mass-definition consequence; [N] the reheating-channel quantification; [P] the archive comparison (the old N_star=3/phi0-1 is a posited algebraic count, NOT re-promoted to [E]); [X] the test. Does NOT change the frozen band.

Dependencies: v86; v153; v84; SCALE.OVERDET.01

Scripts: v340_As_reconcile.py

Location: origin_theory

Original CSV, line 442

Original ledger status

QFT4D.EG.ALLORDER.01

QFT4D.EG.ALLORDER.01

The all-order Epstein-Glaser/BRST contract for the perturbative 4D S-matrix S_pert (2026-06-23, review Point 3): the 'all-order closing statement' for the 4D perturbative QFT leg, typing the standard causal-perturbation-theory closure for the TFPT finite interaction class -- NOT a 4D path integral and NOT a new mechanism. [E] POWER-COUNTING: every gauge+matter vertex (Yang-Mills + Dirac-Yukawa + Higgs + ghost) is a mass-dimension-4 marginal operator, so the Epstein-Glaser singular order omega<=4 and the renormalisation ambiguity is a FINITE-dimensional local space at every order (power-counting renormalisable). [E] BRST NILPOTENCY s^2=0: s c^a=-(1/2) f^{abc} c^b c^c is nilpotent iff Jacobi holds; verified EXACTLY for su(2) (residual 0) and su(3) (1e-16), the carrier weak+colour gauge content. [E] the seam gap Delta=6 ln(3/2)>0 (v302) gives the IR-safe adiabatic limit g->1 (Epstein-Glaser-Blanchard-Seneor for a mass gap). [C] IMPORTED: T_n exists to all orders by causal factorisation (Epstein-Glaser 1973 / Brunetti-Fredenhagen). [C] IMPORTED: all-order BRST invariance (Piguet-Sorella / Kugo-Ojima quantum action principle) => Slavnov-Taylor to all orders. [E] SCOPE FENCE: matter+gauge ONLY -- the R^2/Weyl^2 gravity sub-sector (Stelle ghost) is the entire-form-factor resummation v304/v370/v380, NOT a local EG vertex; S_pert is NOT the ambient non-perturbative QG measure (QG.AMB.01, a [C] redundancy v369). NET [C], prerequisites [E]; NOT [E]. Extends the S_pert skeleton v269/v271/v273 + LSZ v278 from 1-loop matter+gauge to an all-order contract.

Recorded status: All-order EG/BRST contract [C] (imported EG causal factorisation + BRST renormalisation on the TFPT finite dim-4 gauge+matter class + the seam gap); prerequisites power-counting/BRST-nilpotency/gap [E]

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: [E] the three TFPT prerequisites (dim-4 power-counting -> finite counterterm space; BRST nilpotency via Jacobi for su(2)/su(3); the seam gap -> adiabatic limit); [C] the two imported heavy legs (all-order T_n existence by causal factorisation; all-order BRST invariance / Slavnov-Taylor); NOT [E] (no in-repo formal induction), matter+gauge only (gravity fenced to v304/v370/v380; ambient QG.AMB.01 a [C] redundancy). A typed all-order contract, not a path integral.

Dependencies: v269; v271; v273; v278; v302; v304; v370; v380; v369

Scripts: v381_qft4d_eg_allorder.py

Location: tfpt_5_redteam; tfpt_2

Original CSV, line 444

Original ledger status

ALPHA.QUILLEN.INFLOW.01

ALPHA.QUILLEN.INFLOW.01

THE ALPHA^3 LEVEL = THE COMPUTED BULK CHERN INVARIANT + THE SEAM F-NORMALISATION = THE AFFINE EMBEDDING INDEX (2026-07-02, closure-route round) -- upgrades BOTH residuals left after v433/v434/v435; does NOT close ALPHA.QUILLEN.EXACT.01. [E] TARGET RE-VERIFIED: alpha^-1 = 137.0359992168 unique root; Quillen split a^3 - 2 c3^3 a^2 = 8 b1 c3^6 ln(1/phi_seam) at the root < 1e-35 (v341/v382). [E] THE INVARIANT COMPUTED: FHS Chern C(M=1) = 1, C(M=3) = 0 -- the same integers as v367/v461, here read as the quantised U(1) response of the collar phase. [C] k0 = |C| = 1 UNDER THE EM1 READING: the a^3 coefficient EQUALS the computed bulk invariant of the SAME p+ip model that realises S3 -- 'why exactly 1' is answered by COMPUTATION plus the cited inflow identification (TKNN PRL 49 (1982) / Avron-Seiler-Simon PRL 51 (1983): integer quantisation of the U(1) response; Callan-Harvey NPB 250 (1985): boundary level = bulk response; APS 1975 / Alvarez-Gaume-Della Pietra-Moore Ann. Phys. 163 (1985) / Witten RMP 88 (2016): the metric-independent part of delta log det is the eta/CS level; Quillen 1985 / Bismut-Freed CMP 106 (1986): determinant-line curvature integrality) -- REPLACING v435's minimality assumption ('1 is the unit level') by a measurement on the model. [E] k_Y = 5/3 EXACT: tr_5bar(Y^2)/tr(T3^2) = (5/6)/(1/2) = 5/3 (Ginsparg PLB 197 (1987), the string-GUT hypercharge level); (3/5) x (41/6) = 41/10 = b1 -- the 'GUT 3/5' in the closure IS the inverse embedding index, not an imported convention; carrier decomposition 41/6 = 20/3 (3 generations x 16-content) + 1/6 (Higgs doublet). [C] F-NORMALISATION RETYPED: once the seam net is (E8)_1 at level 1 (SEAM.EQUIV.01), the U(1)_Y current sits inside a level-1 current algebra and <J(z)J(w)> = k/(z-w)^2 is FIXED by the embedding index -- level-1 current-algebra rigidity, no continuous dial; the v434 [C] ('how does the gauge curvature couple to the boundary measure') has ZERO independent content: it is a face of SEAM.EQUIV.01 (consistent with the v382 typing), its value the embedding index. [E] THE STRUCTURAL UNIFICATION: the two named targets share ONE object -- the collar phase carries TWO quantised responses, gravitational c_- = 16 x 1/2 x |C| = 8 = g_car + N_fam (feeds SEAM.EQUIV.01/S3, v456) and U(1) C = 1 (feeds the a^3 level, EM1); 'the one theorem and the one number' are two faces of the SAME invertible phase, and closing R1' (v469) feeds both residuals simultaneously. [O] NOT CLOSED: the bridge lemma 'delta log det_zeta(seam) = the inflow response' stays the named cited step; the EM1 reading stays [C]; ALPHA.QUILLEN.EXACT.01 stays [O]; alpha^-1 = 137.0359992 stays [E] regardless. UPDATED 2026-08-27 (v974): the inflow step 'boundary level = bulk response' is upgraded from cited to COMPUTED on the same model (probe laughlin_pump_em1_probe 20/20, PUMP_QUANTIZED_MATCHES_CHERN): Laughlin pump +1 per flux quantum (teleport bookkeeping with exact period closure), edge spectral flow -1/+1 antisymmetric as inflow demands, Streda dN/dPhi = C/(2 pi) exact integers over n_phi = 0..3 -- all equal to the FHS Chern, with the M = 3 controls all zero. The identification of the complex-copy U(1) with the physical Majorana collar stays part of the cited EM1 reading [C]; ALPHA.QUILLEN.EXACT.01 stays [O].

Recorded status: Inflow level + embedding rigidity [E]/[C]/[O]: the a^3 coefficient = the COMPUTED bulk Chern |C| = 1 of the v367 collar (TKNN/ASS quantisation + Callan-Harvey inflow + APS/Witten eta=CS), replacing v435's minimality; the seam F-normalisation = the affine embedding index k_Y = 5/3 (Ginsparg 1987, (3/5)(41/6) = 41/10 = b1) -- zero independent content, a face of SEAM.EQUIV.01; one phase, two responses (c_- = 8, C = 1) feeding both named targets; ALPHA.QUILLEN.EXACT.01 stays [O]

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: -

Dependencies: ALPHA.QUILLEN.EXACT.01; ALPHA.QUILLEN.PROGRESS.02; ALPHA.QUILLEN.PROGRESS.03; ALPHA.QUILLEN.PROGRESS.04; EM.WARD.01; SEAM.EQUIV.CROSSEDPRODUCT.01; v341; v367; v382; v433; v434; v435; v456; v461

Scripts: v470_alpha_inflow_level.py

Location: tfpt_1_architecture_e8

Original CSV, line 531

Original ledger status

SEAM.CONTACT.UNIT.02

SEAM.CONTACT.UNIT.02

THE DIAGONAL CHANNEL SETTLED -- THE MERGED TARGET COLLAPSES ONTO THE KEYSTONE (2026-07-14, deep-dive round III; completes the computable side of SEAM.CONTACT.UNIT.01/v484): [E] DIAGONAL ZERO AT THE KMS SCALE: the renormalised coincident-point Green function of |D| on a circle of circumference l (zero mode removed, flat short-distance subtraction) is G_reg(0; l) = (1/pi) ln(l/2pi) EXACTLY (symbolic limit + 30-digit numeric checks at l = pi, 2pi, 4pi) -- it vanishes iff l = 2 pi = 1/(4 c3), the v239 KMS seam circumference: the seam scale is the unique zero-self-energy scheme point. [E] THE LOG IS THE SCALE CHANNEL: G_reg(0; 2 pi kappa) = (1/pi) ln kappa -- matching the functional structure: F_U(1) carries exactly ONE log term (the transport 8 b1 c3^6 ln(1/phi_seam), v3) while the phi0 split (4/3)c3 + 48 c3^4 is log-free; [C] reading: the log term is the diagonal/scale channel, the log-free terms are contact data at the KMS point. [E] CLOSED-FORM RESUMMATION (the BFK/gluing route already in the suite, v151): for a finite-rank mark potential the zeta-det ratio reduces to the 4x4 mark determinant, and with the diagonal zero the v484 expansion RESUMS exactly: det(I - u C) = (1 - 4u)(1 + 2u)^2, u = eps c3 ln2, C = circ(0,1,2,1) -- closed form to ALL orders, the linear term absent precisely because the diagonal vanishes (Tr C = 0), series = v484's Tr(C^k) = 4^k + 2(-2)^k term by term. [E] WEIGHT DICHOTOMY (the multiplicity matching): the SAME 48 = 3 x 16 admissible states (v245) carry both multiplicities -- counted FLAT they give the phi0 puncture count 48 = Omega_adm = N_fam dim S+; counted with the U(1) response weights (Y^2 with the standard loop/GUT factors) they give the alpha budget 41 = 10 b1 = 40 fermionic (Tr_16 Y^2 = 10/3 exact, nu^c = 0) + 1 Higgs (Ginsparg (3/5)(41/6) = 41/10, v470) -- one state set, two response weights, no new number. [C]/[O] CONSEQUENCE: with v484 (unit + cycle sector) EVERY finite/computable piece of the merged ALPHA.QUILLEN.EXACT.01 + HYP.PHI0.PUNCTURE.01 target is proven; the single remaining [O] is the identification of the abstract seam zeta-det with this glued mark determinant -- a face of SEAM.EQUIV.01, exactly the v382 typing, now substantiated computationally. The merged residual collapses onto the keystone; no separate analytic unknown remains. No gate closes, no marker moves; no coefficient fitted (all integers forced by the square configuration and the SM charge table). UPDATED 2026-08-27 (v974): the BFK/gluing resummation named here is now EXECUTED (probe seam_bfk_conical_det_probe 21/21, promoted as v974): C_glue = 2^-N exactly (N = 1..4 symbolic, general interval lengths, Laurent-polynomial identity), massless reassembly det'_zeta(Delta_S1) = l^2 = 2^-N prod(2 a_j) (l/N) det'(R_0) with det'(R_0) = N l / prod a_j, jump matrix = inverse mark Green matrix R(m) = (G_m|_marks)^-1 exactly, and the diagonal/scale channel reproduced exactly through log det'Delta(l) - log det'Delta(1/(4 c3)) = (1/(4 c3)) G_reg(0; l). The keystone typing is unchanged: pillowcase moduli, the 8 b1 index budget and a |D|-level BFK as an operator identity stay open with the keystone.

Recorded status: Completion of the computable side [E]/[C]/[O] (diagonal zero at the KMS scale; closed-form resummation; multiplicity dichotomy; residual = the SEAM.EQUIV.01 face alone)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: Computable side complete: diagonal = 0 at KMS scale, resummation closed-form, 48/41 = one state set under two weights; remaining [O] = the SEAM.EQUIV.01 face (v382 typing substantiated)

Dependencies: SEAM.CONTACT.UNIT.01; ALPHA.QUILLEN.EXACT.01; HYP.PHI0.PUNCTURE.01; HYP.PHI0.GEOM.01; EM.WARD.02; DYN.KMS.01; v3; v151; v239; v245; v434; v470; v483; v484

Scripts: v485_contact_diagonal_closed.py

Location: tfpt_1;origin_theory

Original CSV, line 546

Open questions preserve their achieved subresults

Each research problem has its own scope. A resolved task does not close its whole physical parent. Historical tasks remain explicitly historical in the source record.

Future quotient and positive GNS reconstruction

What is determined by complete future behavior, and what additional positive word-kernel source is needed to reconstruct a cyclic operator realization?

  • Resolved in scope: Future quotient from complete rRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Conditional GNS reconstruction from supplied KRead result
  • open: Select complete K from the original source
Historical: common source, state and event selection

Outside the active mathematical research program since the user's23Oct2026 decision. Historical question: Do the original principles derive a common physical source together with its state, dynamical events, and physically observed fields?

Seam connection and family action

Does the joint discrete theorem determine a concrete connection and a family coupling compatible with the determinant seam action?

  • Resolved in scope: Separate classes from actual transportRead result
  • open: Derive the common connection from the original source
Physical time and complete transfer

Do the original reflection/projector structures determine the full physical time generator and required field transfer?

  • Resolved in scope: Reuse the sign-projector counterexampleRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Reuse conditional full-transfer reconstructionRead result
  • open: Identify the physical complete TFPT transfer
  • Resolved in scope: Reuse complete collar reconstructionRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Classify homogeneous GKLS embedding of the shared register familyRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Decide every homogeneous GKSL logarithm of the fixed M4 channelRead result
Flavor ratio and absolute amplitude scale

Which flavor quantity is fixed on the derived discrete stratum, and which requires the continuous holonomy anchor?

  • Resolved in scope: Reuse the derived flavor ratioRead result
  • open: Determine the absolute holonomy amplitude
Alpha closure for fixed inputs

Which closure equation follows for a fixed seam projector, and which inputs still need justification?

  • Resolved in scope: Separate root calculation from source selectionRead result
  • open: Derive alpha inputs and Thomson transfer
  • Resolved in scope: Establish the unique global positive rootRead result
Geometric flow and gravity normalization

Do common matter-only observations derive geometric horizon flow and the area response from the original gravity source?

  • Resolved in scope: Record scope of fixed original functionalRead result
  • open: Derive geometric modular response and area coefficient
Clocks and complete neutral source response

Which complete quadratic response can the actual clock images reconstruct?

  • Resolved in scope: Reconstruct all neutral quadratic matrix directionsRead result
  • open: Derive physically admissible probe access
Clock action on charge, time and quarter transition

How does the actual Gaussian J act on the complete marked source?

  • Resolved in scope: Construct original J lift with complete time/charge actionRead result
  • open: Derive physical meaning of the frame orbit
Which responses distinguish charged time action?

Which data separate sources with identical complete neutral vacuum response?

  • Resolved in scope: Determine twist blindness completelyRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Reconstruct twist from charged responsesRead result
  • open: Derive actual charged source probes
Which seam action distinguishes native opposite charges?

Can existing native charge fields produce the quarter-twist time response of the seam?

  • Resolved in scope: Check native fields and response discriminatorRead result
  • open: Derive actual marked seam/state action
Constructive seam search: operators, state and source compatibility

What does the complete phase search decide, and which additional state information prevents a false source solution?

  • Resolved in scope: Finite search closed, actual winding and parity equivalenceRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Positive finite-word state extensionRead result
  • Resolved in scope: E8 current group conditionally determines the P signRead result
  • Resolved in scope: The same shift functional hides distinct ground statesRead result
  • Resolved in scope: No phase hit realizes the unchanged sourceRead result
Which partner actually belongs to the original seam?

Which charge, state type and time action belong to the root partner and original sheet pairing?

  • Resolved in scope: Concrete pair operator; source neutrality is not hypercharge neutralityRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Fixed quarter time splits the color/weak multipletRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Explicit conjugation for the existing sheet pairingRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Actual partner map between quarter domainsRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Bilinear sheet pairing is not Hermitian kernel selectionRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Actual quarter conjugation transports the supplied markingRead result
  • Resolved in scope: No time-stabilizing orthogonal repair of the fixed markingRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Spinor16 is a state sector, not a 16-real one-particle fieldRead result
Automated construction of operator maps and sources

Which tools generate operator maps, learn counterexamples, and can search for the full positive source?

  • Resolved in scope: Calibrate new search without supplying the target mapRead result
  • open: Synthesize a joint field, marking and transfer dictionary
  • open: Search for the positive common source kernel itself
  • Resolved in scope: Automatically construct, certify and distinguish finite kernelsRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Repair search conditions against source types and collar controlsRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Reconstruct multi-field sewing of the canonically identified boundary sourceRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Retain absolute reference amplitude in searchRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Integrate supplied free source including boundary response and scalarRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Convert the full finite CAR kernel into a link functionalRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Close original recursive word reconstruction with memoryRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Retain whole original caller through scale and readoutRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute actual shared Higgs source with full matter words and local RPRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Reduce whole constant original Higgs spectral fiberRead result
  • open: Resolve original geometric Higgs residue sign and field map
  • Resolved in scope: Evaluate local original Higgs heat identification and whole finite consumerRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute whole variable bound Higgs reference and original scale mapRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute whole inner Higgs scale/source and normal kernel transportRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute given whole superconnection and normal spectral readerRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Determine own-admissibility and whole total-chiral spectral readersRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Derive whole scale-energy map,normal profile and relative flowRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute original Green energy producer and mixed scale readoutRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Match current action argument and common Higgs/gravity weightsRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute whole original curvature consumers and Higgs radial sourceRead resultRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute original whole four-ghost source and geometric type testRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute original moving normal kernel derivative and whole source responseRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Decide fixed original O1 source and normal operator placementRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Compare whole Higgs mixture and covariance reader on invariant four-field witnessRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Test exact bounded cutoff on whole ordinary Higgs volumeRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Test whole original circle joint mode and IR Higgs normalizationRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Test original O1 mode covariance against whole Higgs-law classRead result
  • open: Reconstruct original localization from the whole process
  • Resolved in scope: Test bare native-code word compression against actual localityRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Decide original geometric local-time class and execute actual interval readerRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute actual regional two-face partner and supported charged wordRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute original color marginal, modular field law and complete class readerRead resultRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Reconstruct common Higgs law from whole original quarter source towerRead resultRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute original record action on Doily and ordered whole source responseRead resultRead resultRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Locally implement original record process and test unchanged exterior sourceRead resultRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute original elliptic insertion,whole source and causal responseRead resultRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Evaluate actual joint Higgs and color group sourceRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute whole original graph color reader with typed original center selectorRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute original color fixed source and first inherited grading testRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute actual original color-spinor CAR four-word and complete spin-sector sewingRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Decide actual color admissibility of density operations and coordinate regionsRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute actual whole seam-operation class and two-face responseRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute entire original C6 word expansion with source amplitudeRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute original collective Higgs force source and entire mean dualRead resultRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute original all-mode force with actual time and whole sourceRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute original local space/time force source and causal liftRead resultRead result
Origin reverse selection, field dictionary and original P1 kernel

What does reverse selection of P1/P2 give for concrete local fields and multi-field responses, and which identification with the original P1 kernel has actually been proved?

Observable reality: minimal conditions and counterworlds

Which operational conditions are independently required, which inequivalent models satisfy them, and which observable distinctions remain for selection?

Formal carrier core: unbounded Pascal uniqueness and finite glue

Which carrier and glue statements are already present in the papers and Lean sources, and which physical selection does not follow?

  • Resolved in scope: Classify the unbounded Pascal proofRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Classify the formal finite glue scopeRead result
Active mathematical program: marked seam monodromies and lattice lifts

Which marked seam/lattice transport geometries, lift classes and local-coefficient invariants arise from existing clock/reflection/quartic data? First complete case: sign lifts of fourJ representation on CP1 minusμ4.

  • Resolved in scope: Define marked seam category and factor formulaRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Completely classify quarter-clock four-puncture liftsRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Determine central class and all subgroup restrictionsRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Determine full G0 cocycle and classRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Determine native4/5/6local cohomologyRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Classify unrestricted G31 reflection monodromiesRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Determine lift class beyond G0Read result
  • open: Classify additional reflection/clock equivariance and mapping-class quotients
  • Resolved in scope: Equivariant lifting and divisibility by eightRead result
  • Resolved in scope: All62clock obstructions and central transport variantsRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Actual group comparison and central pushout exclusionRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Complete invariants and explicit collisionsRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Compare E6 and E7 slices with the actual quarter clockRead resultRead resultRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Classify original character-valued G31monodromy liftsRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Determine E7-pair action on all original lattice fieldsRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Completely connect E6/E7 cuts to the original compilerRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Compare common covers and actual clock carriersRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Prove shared representation consequence for48,4/3 and5/4Read result
  • Resolved in scope: Completely decide joint compiler-field-cover constructionRead resultRead resultRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Reconstruct canonical local compiler field source from C4Read resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Eliminate redundant sector and multiplicity assumptionsRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Classify native equivariant markingsRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Classify pure quarter clock mapping class quotientRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Determine complete cut algebra and lossless tetrahedron transformRead resultRead resultRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Completely compare scalar glue and actual native compiler classRead resultRead resultRead resultRead result
Common clock sectors, quartic geometry and operational reconstruction

Which previously separate data of the original TFPT core follow from a common clock and representation geometry, and which complete finite measurement classification follows without asserting physical source selection?