Publication history: 2026-08-20
Original publication entries retain their wording and recorded status. Follow the current research history for later findings and revisions.
20 Aug 2026
1 update- Seam & QGEOCXIThe externalization contracts — the two open non-RH kind-(A) external-math targets
SEAM.EQUIV.01andALPHA.QUILLEN.EXACT.01packaged as short, self-contained EXTERNALIZATION CONTRACTS for outside specialist mathematicians (conformal nets/VOA/AQFT for the seam; determinant lines/\eta-invariants/index theory for alpha), added as two new sections at the end oftfpt_research_contracts(before “Certifiability and recommended order”), plus a one-sentence pointer in the head keybox; DOCUMENTATION ONLY — no module touched, no number changed, no status marker moved, no gate closed or narrowed, NO RH claimSummary
The
SEAM.EQUIV.01contract states the minimal theorem (the scaling limit of the gapped \mu_4-equivariant CAR collar exists in local-net topology; the index-4 simple-current extension functor commutes with the limit; the OS reconstruction is the holomorphic (E_8)_1 lattice net) broken into the four review-named lemmata L1 (uniform energy/nuclearity bounds — honestly typed: NO uniform nuclearity estimate exists in the corpus), L2 (convergence of local algebras, the cited Osborne–Stottmeister scaling-limit theorem with the \mu_4-equivariant structure retained), L3 (crossed product commutes with the limit; the finite index-4 Q-system is explicit,v125/v154/v469) and L4 (uniqueness of the holomorphic c=8 reconstruction; \det K=1 vs the same-c rival SO(16)_1), with the complete typed hypothesis list (12 PROVEN-FINITE rows citingv302/v113/v155/v160/v356/v366/v367/v368/v461/v376/v377/v378/v379/v125/v154/v216/v286, 5 CITED-CLASSICAL rows, 1 OPEN target), the runnable finite models, the HONEST Lean axiom surface (SeamScalingLimit.leankernel-proves only the arithmetic hypotheses bydecide; the analytic content is named cited axioms over opaqueProps; nosorry; explicitly flagged: L1–L4 have ZERO Lean content beyond the composition audit), five must-fail controls (MF-S1: c=8 alone must NOT suffice — the red-team point; MF-S2: index-2 glue must yield SO(16)_1; MF-S3: the trivial M=3 collar must give no chiral limit; MF-S4: non-order-4 clock breaks the marks; MF-S5: thev286import firewall) and four acceptance tests;Key points
- 1The
SEAM.EQUIV.01contract states the minimal theorem (the scaling limit of the gapped \mu_4-equivariant CAR collar exists in local-net topology; the index-4 simple-current extension functor commutes with the limit; the OS reconstruction is the holomorphic (E_8)_1 lattice net) broken into the four review-named lemmata L1 (uniform energy/nuclearity bounds — honestly typed: NO uniform nuclearity estimate exists in the corpus), L2 (convergence of local algebras, the cited Osborne–Stottmeister scaling-limit theorem with the \mu_4-equivariant structure retained), L3 (crossed product commutes with the limit; the finite index-4 Q-system is explicit,v125/v154/v469) and L4 (uniqueness of the holomorphic c=8 reconstruction; \det K=1 vs the same-c rival SO(16)_1), with the complete typed hypothesis list (12 PROVEN-FINITE rows citingv302/v113/v155/v160/v356/v366/v367/v368/v461/v376/v377/v378/v379/v125/v154/v216/v286, 5 CITED-CLASSICAL rows, 1 OPEN target), the runnable finite models, the HONEST Lean axiom surface (SeamScalingLimit.leankernel-proves only the arithmetic hypotheses bydecide; the analytic content is named cited axioms over opaqueProps; nosorry; explicitly flagged: L1–L4 have ZERO Lean content beyond the composition audit), five must-fail controls (MF-S1: c=8 alone must NOT suffice — the red-team point; MF-S2: index-2 glue must yield SO(16)_1; MF-S3: the trivial M=3 collar must give no chiral limit; MF-S4: non-order-4 clock breaks the marks; MF-S5: thev286import firewall) and four acceptance tests; - 2The
ALPHA.QUILLEN.EXACT.01contract states the two-step theorem T1 (gap-stable continuum limit c_1(\det D_{\mathrm{finite}})\to c_1(\det_\zeta D_{\mathrm{seam}}) under norm-resolvent convergence with the Fermi gap uniformly open over the twist torus — the Dai–Freed section has no zero; finite side computed,v472) and T2 (\delta_\tau(\log\det_\zeta\Delta_{U(1)}+8b_1c_3^6\log\varphi_{\mathrm{seam}})=0 = Bismut–Freed curvature = inflow response with the exact corpus coefficients k_0=|C|=1, k_Y=5/3, b_1=41/10, c_3=1/(8\pi), exponent -5/4=-q(D_5)), the two named open faces (the analytic diagonal-\zeta/multiplicity facev484/v485and the topologicalEM1lemmav48/v435), the typed hypothesis list (10 PROVEN-FINITE rows citingv3/v48/v341/v382/v434/v470/v435/v342/v367/v472/v484/v485/v391/v433, 5 CITED-CLASSICAL rows, 1 OPEN target), the runnable finite models, the HONEST Lean statement (there is NO Lean formalisation of this target — stated plainly), four must-fail controls (MF-A1: no experimental \alpha anywhere in the construction; MF-A2: deck/carrier/Chern-level ablations must destroy the CODATA match; MF-A3: M=3\Rightarrow C=0, M=-1\Rightarrow C=-1; MF-A4: the \{0,3,6\} \pi-power/metric-independence partition) and the review's three acceptance tests verbatim (no experimental \alpha input; unique physical fixed point 137.0359992168; ablations destroy the hit) plus one structural test; - 3The website paper mirror of
tfpt_research_contracts(papers.ts) gains one section entry covering both contracts;tfpt_research_contracts.pdfandchangelog.pdfrecompiled and mirrored viabash build.sh website; maps andchangelog.tsregenerated viabash build.sh gen;bash build.sh audit\to AUDIT OK; manifests regenerated LAST. Both targets stay [O]; NO RH claim anywhere
- 1