Skip to main content
Back to the knowledge atlas

Original claim records.

The original technical record remains available here. For explanations, reviewed conclusions and the history of research questions, start with the knowledge atlas.

Research snapshot 2026-11-02 · 783 active ledger claims · 710 scientific findings · 707 registered scripts. These are different inventories, not counts of independent physical confirmations.

What does this inventory cover?

Every one of the 783 active ledger IDs is included. All 788 ledger rows, including superseded rows, remain in the download. The reviewed research corpus contains 711 findings; 1 administrative record is excluded from public scientific content, with the omission recorded in the coverage file.

The scientific findings include 519 established scoped results, 63 conditional results and 128 scoped exclusions. These labels describe the recorded finding. They do not upgrade its parent physical goal or overwrite the original ledger.

Sources were matched to their recorded hashes and line ranges at this snapshot. Bounded text excerpts make sources available even when a source is not in the earlier public release. Any omitted administrative lines are explicitly marked. This is source coverage, not a new execution of Python, Lean or Wolfram proofs.

Atlas revision 2c1b559b738e5740ecfad8e6 · snapshot SHA256 68c2fe33ce86d45a99a8c21b1e731e40749d0accb3ae69be53d198cd7ebcb48e

1493 matching records · page 14 of 75

Original ledger status

QGEO.ENERGY.02

QGEO.ENERGY.02

THE ENERGY-COMMUTATOR CONTRACT (external-review proposal 2026-06-14; the NON-CIRCULAR sharpening of QGEO.ENERGY.01): the proposed premise is the operator identity [rho, Lambda_Sigma]=0 on the rank-8 Calderon polarisation -- rho the carrier clock, Lambda_Sigma the Dirichlet-to-Neumann (Calderon) energy form of the RAW RP seam double. Three sub-claims make it non-circular: (1) [E] rho is defined from the CARRIER algebra (the Coxeter element of W(A3)=S4, order 4=|mu4|, v117/HOR.CLOCK), NOT imported from the seam geometry; (2) [O] THE NON-CIRCULARITY HINGE -- Lambda_Sigma must be the DtN of the RAW RP seam (definable from RP data alone), NOT the mu4 normal-form operator; if 'raw seam' requires P^1\\mu4 assumed it is circular, if from RP data alone the commutator is a genuine rigidity statement (this is the ONE honestly open premise); (3) [E] [rho,Lambda_Sigma]=0 forces the mu4 character grading (1,2,3) on H^1, already established (QGEO.COHOM.01, eigenforms z^{k-1}dz/(z^4-1), v177). EXACT [I] consistency anchor: the induced EH coefficient k=(ln m)/(12 pi) (v150) reproduces c3/2=1/(16 pi) iff ln m=q(A3)=3/4=N_fam/|mu4| (FAMILY glue norm), and q(D5)=5/4=g_car/|mu4| (carrier) gives the WRONG k (off by g_car/N_fam=5/3) -- so the energy form MUST reproduce the family norm, NOT the carrier norm (gravity is family-geometry-induced). VERDICT: a PROOF TARGET, strictly sharper and non-circular IFF sub-claim 2 holds; if proven, QGEO.SYM.01 turns from definitional bedrock into an ENERGY-RIGIDITY THEOREM. Not a proof -- the bedrock stays [O]. Python-only (the q(A3) rigidity is exact and Wolfram-mirrored)

Recorded status: Geometric premise [O] (energy-commutator proof target; sharper, non-circular IFF sub-claim 2)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: Geometric [O]: QGEO.ENERGY.02 = [rho,Lambda_Sigma]=0 (energy commutator); non-circular proof target for QGEO.SYM.01 IFF the raw-seam DtN (sub-claim 2) is RP-definable; exact rider: the EH coefficient selects q(A3)=3/4 (family), not q(D5)=5/4 (carrier)

Dependencies: QGEO.ENERGY.01; QGEO.SYM.01; QGEO.COHOM.01; HOR.CLOCK.01; v150_replica_eh_model.py; v192_qgeo_energy_clock.py

Scripts: v193_qgeo_energy_commutator.py

Location: tfpt_research_contracts

Original CSV, line 267

Original ledger status

QGEO.DTN.01

QGEO.DTN.01

SUBCLAIM 2 OF QGEO.ENERGY.02 TACKLED -- 'the raw RP-seam DtN is RP-definable' (external-review next-lever 2026-06-14): a REDUCTION, not a closure. (1) FINITE CORE [E]: rho:z|->iz on H^1(P^1\\mu4)=<w1,w2,w3>, wk=z^{k-1}dz/(z^4-1), acts as rho* wk = i^k wk (characters i,-1,-i DISTINCT; (iz)^4-1=z^4-1 invariant) -- verified symbolically; distinct eigenvalues => any operator commuting with rho is DIAGONAL on H^1, and the harmonic structure IS rho-equivariant there (v177/COHOM core) => [rho,Lambda_Sigma]=0 on H^1 is [E]. (2) HINGE MET [I]: the DtN/transfer operator is RP-canonical -- Osterwalder-Schrader reconstruction yields T=e^{-H} from the RP state + reflection alone (no coordinates; v54/SEAM.HORIZON.01, tfpt_2 (4)) -- on a quasi-free seam state (v155: the boundary marginal of a Gaussian bulk is the compression P Gamma P, a contraction). So Lambda_Sigma is RP-definable WITHOUT choosing P^1\\mu4: subclaim 2's non-circularity hinge is essentially met at the canonical level. (3) RESIDUAL RELOCATES [O]: [rho,Lambda_Sigma]=0 on the FULL boundary L^2 (beyond the 3-dim H^1) <=> the quasi-free seam state's modular flow is GEOMETRIC (Bisognano-Wichmann) -- a named, standard (hard) AQFT property, strictly sharper than 'the seam IS P^1\\mu4 (definitional)'. CIRCULARITY WATCH: BW normally presupposes a conformal/Poincare-covariant net (part of what is derived), so the BW step must be established INTRINSICALLY (modular geometricity from RP+quasi-free alone) or it re-circulates -- that intrinsic geometricity is the irreducible analytic content. VERDICT: subclaim 2's hinge met + finite core [E] => QGEO.SYM.01 REDUCES from a definitional postulate to 'intrinsic BW geometric modular covariance of the quasi-free seam state' -- one notch sharper, STILL [O]; the last structural fog point sharpens, does NOT close to [E]. Python-only (H^1 commutation is exact Moebius-symbolic like v177; reduction is structural)

Recorded status: Geometric premise [O] (reduction: subclaim-2 hinge met, finite core [E], bedrock -> BW modular)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: Geometric [O]: subclaim 2 (raw-seam DtN RP-definability) met at the canonical OS level + finite core [E]; QGEO.SYM.01 reduces to intrinsic Bisognano-Wichmann modular covariance of the quasi-free seam state -- sharper, still [O], not closed

Dependencies: QGEO.ENERGY.02; QGEO.SYM.01; QGEO.TREE.01; SEAM.HORIZON.01; v177_seam_marking_kernel.py; v155_quasifree_boundary.py; v54_seam_horizon_keystones.py

Scripts: v194_raw_seam_dtn_rp.py

Location: tfpt_research_contracts

Original CSV, line 268

Original ledger status

QGEO.MARKS.02

QGEO.MARKS.02

LEFSCHETZ/CHARACTER DERIVATION OF THE FOUR SEAM MARKS (external-review path 2/priority 2, 2026-06-14): instead of POSITING D4 boundary marks (the old QGEO.MARKS.01 finite core), the marks are FORCED to be a free mu4 orbit by orbit-counting plus the H^1 character. (1) [E] rho:z|->iz has order 4 and fixes EXACTLY {0,infinity}; rho^2:z|->-z also fixes only {0,infinity}; so any point off the fixed locus has a FREE order-4 orbit {z,iz,-z,-iz}. (2) [E] NO TRIVIAL CHARACTER: the carrier datum H^1=chi_1+chi_2+chi_3 (the A3 exponents (1,2,3)=Spec Q_+, v177/COHOM) has no trivial component, so no puncture sits at a rho-fixed point. (3) [E] rank H_1(P^1 minus n)=n-1=3 => n=4 punctures, all off the fixed locus => exactly ONE free order-4 orbit => the marks are a free mu4 orbit, Moebius-equivalent to {1,i,-1,-i} (cross-ratio 2). (4) [E] LEFSCHETZ CONSISTENCY: Tr(rho|H^1)=i+i^2+i^3=-1 and on closed P^1 L(rho)=Tr(H^0)+Tr(H^2)=1+1=2=#fixed points. RESIDUAL [O]: the marks no longer rest on a geometric posit (D4 marks) but on the milder representation premise 'the raw seam H^1 carries the A3-exponent rep chi_1+chi_2+chi_3' -- a carrier-algebra statement (A3 exponents are algebraic, independent of the seam geometry). So QGEO.MARKS reduces from geometry to an H^1-rep premise; less circular, still [O]. Exact; Wolfram-mirrored

Recorded status: Identity [E] (orbit/character core) + premise [O] (H^1-rep)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: Identity [E]: orbit-counting (order-4 rho fixes {0,inf}; no trivial H^1 char; rank 3 => 4 punctures) forces the marks to a free mu4 orbit; residual [O] relocates from 'seam is P^1\\mu4' to 'H^1 carries the A3-exponent rep' -- less circular

Dependencies: QGEO.MARKS.01; QGEO.TREE.01; QGEO.SYM.01; v177_seam_marking_kernel.py; v178_marks_kernel_attempt.py

Scripts: v195_marks_lefschetz_character.py

Location: tfpt_research_contracts

Original CSV, line 269

Original ledger status

QGEO.VARI.01

QGEO.VARI.01

THE E_fail VARIATIONAL FUNCTIONAL (external-review path 1, 2026-06-14): a concrete, numerically-testable sharpening of the v194/QGEO.ENERGY.02 target. E_fail(Sigma,rho) = ||[rho,Lambda_Sigma]||^2_HS + ||rho^4-1||^2 + ||Theta rho Theta - rho^{-1}||^2, with E_fail=0 <=> the QGEO.SYM.01 conditions hold (energy commutator + order-4 clock + RP-reflection twist). (1) [E] on the finite H^1 block (rho=diag(i,-1,-i), Lambda diagonal=mu4-equivariant, Theta=complex conjugation) all three terms vanish: [rho,Lambda]=0, rho^4=I, conj(rho)=rho^{-1} => E_fail=0. (2) [N] a mu4-breaking off-diagonal Lambda gives [rho,Lambda]!=0 and a non-order-4 rho gives rho^4!=I, both raising E_fail>0 => the mu4 configuration is a true minimiser (verified numerically). (3) [I] the zero locus is exactly the seam-deck conditions of QGEO.SYM.01. (4) [O] minimising E_fail over the FULL raw-seam DtN (beyond the finite H^1) is exactly the v194 statement that the quasi-free seam state's modular flow is geometric (Bisognano-Wichmann) -- so E_fail gives a discretisable variational handle on the open bedrock, a TARGET not a closure. Python-only (finite-block linear algebra; finite vanishing exact, Wolfram-mirrored)

Recorded status: Numerical/identity [N]/[I] (finite vanishing exact) + target [O] (full-operator min = BW)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: Numerical/identity [N]/[I]: E_fail=0 exactly at the mu4 config and >0 for perturbations (mu4 minimiser); full-operator minimisation = the v194 Bisognano-Wichmann residual [O] -- a concrete discretisable handle on the bedrock

Dependencies: QGEO.ENERGY.02; QGEO.DTN.01; QGEO.SYM.01; v193_qgeo_energy_commutator.py; v194_raw_seam_dtn_rp.py

Scripts: v196_seam_energy_functional.py

Location: tfpt_research_contracts

Original CSV, line 270

Original ledger status

QGEO.MODULAR.01

QGEO.MODULAR.01

CRACKING THE BEDROCK TO A STATE-INVARIANCE (2026-06-14): the v194 residual -- the full-L^2 commutator [rho,Lambda_Sigma]=0, framed as Bisognano-Wichmann geometric modular flow with a circularity worry -- is (a) made EXACT at the principal-symbol level and (b) reduced via Tomita-Takesaki to a clean state-invariance, removing the circularity. (1) PRINCIPAL SYMBOL [E]: the DtN principal symbol |k|=sqrt(-d^2/dtheta^2) (Lee-Uhlmann, v156) is diag(|n|) and the clock rho:z|->iz (rotation by pi/2) is diag(i^n) in the Fourier basis e^{in theta} -- both DIAGONAL => [rho,|k|]=0 EXACTLY on ALL of L^2 (verified on 33 modes), not just the 3-dim H^1; the leading-order commutation is FREE on the whole boundary, so the open part was never the principal symbol. (2) TOMITA-TAKESAKI [E]: the modular operator Delta_omega is INTRINSIC to (M,Omega); a state-preserving algebra symmetry (rho Omega=Omega, rho M rho*=M) commutes with Delta, hence with the modular Hamiltonian log Delta ~ Lambda_Sigma. So [rho,Lambda_Sigma]=0 FOLLOWS from omega o rho = omega, needing ONLY the state + reflection (which RP supplies) and NO conformal/Poincare covariance -- this REMOVES the v194 Bisognano-Wichmann circularity worry. (3) FINITE BLOCK [E]: on H^1 the covariance is mu4-equivariant (rho* w_k = i^k w_k, v177), so omega o rho = omega already holds there; with (1) the open part is neither the principal symbol nor the finite block. (4) IRREDUCIBLE RESIDUAL [O]: the FULL raw quasi-free seam state is rho-invariant (omega o rho = omega) <= the Gaussian bulk MEASURE is rho(deck)-invariant = the mu4 deck is a symmetry of the raw seam -- the maximally-operational, non-circular form of QGEO.SYM.01 (a STATE/MEASURE invariance, checkable, not a geometric or modular-flow statement). A foundational symmetry postulate cannot be derived from nothing (like c=const); it is now in its sharpest falsifiable form. VERDICT: bedrock cracked to omega o rho = omega -- principal symbol EXACT, Tomita-Takesaki NON-CIRCULAR, finite block invariant; NOT a full closure but the sharpest form, circularity gone. Python-only (principal-symbol Fourier commutation exact, Wolfram-mirrored; Tomita-Takesaki is a standard AQFT theorem)

Recorded status: Geometric premise [O] (bedrock reduced to a non-circular state-invariance; principal symbol exact)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: Geometric [O]: bedrock cracked to omega o rho = omega (raw seam state mu4-invariant) -- principal symbol |k| commutes exactly (Fourier diag), Tomita-Takesaki removes the BW circularity, finite block holds; the irreducible residual is the mu4-symmetry of the raw seam measure (operational QGEO.SYM.01), still [O]

Dependencies: QGEO.DTN.01; QGEO.ENERGY.02; QGEO.SYM.01; QGEO.VARI.01; v194_raw_seam_dtn_rp.py; v177_seam_marking_kernel.py

Scripts: v198_modular_commutator_reduction.py

Location: tfpt_research_contracts

Original CSV, line 271

Original ledger status

QGEO.STATE.01

QGEO.STATE.01

ATTACKING omega o rho = omega DIRECTLY ON THE RAW SEAM (work package A, external-review priority 1, 2026-06-14): a further localising reduction, not a closure. (1) SETUP NON-CIRCULAR [E]: rho is the carrier clock = the Coxeter element of W(A3)=S4 (order 4, rho^4=1, v117), an automorphism of the RAW CAR algebra (16 Majoranas = the carrier net, v156/v175); both rho and the algebra are defined from the CARRIER side with NO seam geometry, so 'rho preserves the seam state' is a genuine, non-circular question. (2) GROUND-STATE REDUCTION [E]: for a quasi-free RP state the covariance is the positive-frequency projection C_Sigma=1/2(1+sgn H_1) of the one-particle Hamiltonian H_1 (~ the DtN), so omega o rho=omega <=> rho preserves C_Sigma <=> [rho,H_1]=0. (3) CHARACTER-BLOCK-DIAGONAL CRITERION [E]: rho has order 4, so the one-particle space splits into the four mu4-character classes {n=r mod 4}; [rho,H_1]=0 <=> H_1 is block-diagonal in these classes -- verified numerically (a character-block-diagonal H commutes, an off-character entry breaks it). (4) [E] the principal symbol |k|=diag(|n|) is diagonal, hence trivially character-block-diagonal, so [rho,|k|]=0 exactly (v198). (5) SHARPENED RESIDUAL [O]: what remains is purely 'the BOUNDED sub-principal symbol of the raw seam DtN has NO off-character (mod 4) matrix elements' -- a bounded, finite-character-class operator condition, not a diffuse geometry; holds on the finite H^1 block (mu4-eigenforms, v177), open on the continuum. VERDICT: omega o rho=omega is confirmed non-circular and reduced to a bounded character-block-diagonal residual; NOT a closure (the foundational symmetry persists), but the sharpest typed form. Python-only

Recorded status: Identity [E] (non-circular setup + reduction) + premise [O] (bounded sub-principal residual)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: Identity/premise [E]/[O]: omega o rho=omega is non-circular (rho a carrier automorphism, raw CAR algebra) and reduces to [rho,H_1]=0 <=> H_1 is mu4-character-block-diagonal; residual = the bounded sub-principal symbol has no off-character matrix elements; not a closure

Dependencies: QGEO.MODULAR.01; QGEO.SYM.01; QGEO.DTN.01; v198_modular_commutator_reduction.py; v177_seam_marking_kernel.py

Scripts: v199_seam_state_invariance.py

Location: tfpt_research_contracts

Original CSV, line 272

Original ledger status

QGEO.SUBPRIN.01

QGEO.SUBPRIN.01

THE v199 BEDROCK RESIDUAL REDUCED ONE GENUINE STEP FURTHER (2026-06-15): block-diagonality of the sub-principal symbol is NOT an independent postulate. (1) [E] the seam DtN is Lambda=|k|+M_f, M_f = multiplication by a curvature function f(theta) on the seam circle (standard Steklov sub-principal structure), so <n|M_f|n'>=f_{n-n'}. (2) [E] M_f is mu4-character-block-diagonal <=> f has Fourier support only on modes ≡0 (mod 4) <=> f is Z4-invariant (the principal |k| already commutes, v198). (3) [E] a mu4-MARK SUM f(theta)=sum_{j=0}^3 g(theta-2pi j/4) has f_m=4 g_m [m≡0 mod 4] for ANY profile g, automatically Z4-invariant, so (v195 marks=mu4 orbit) FORCES the sub-principal symbol block-diagonal. (4) [E] negative controls: 3 equally-spaced marks (Z3) and 4 generic unequal marks both break the commutator -- specific to mu4. (5) [O] NEW RESIDUAL: omega o rho=omega reduces to 'the DtN sub-principal symbol is MARK-LOCAL (seam flat away from the mu4 marks = the conformal-deck structure, v177)'; given it, (v195 marks=mu4 orbit) => Z4-invariant sub-principal => block-diagonal => [rho,H_1]=0 => omega o rho=omega. A genuine reduction; the residual is now structurally definitional (conformal-deck flatness), the narrowest form yet of QGEO.SYM.01. Python-only (exact mark-sum Fourier identity + block-diagonal criterion; Wolfram-mirrored)

Recorded status: Identity [E] (block-diagonality = image of the mu4 marks) + premise [O] (mark-local DtN residual)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: Identity/premise [E]/[O]: the v199 sub-principal block-diagonality is FORCED by the v195 mu4-mark orbit under a mark-local DtN (a mark-sum over mu4 points is Z4-invariant => Fourier support on modes ≡0 mod 4 => block-diagonal); residual reduces to DtN mark-locality (conformal-deck flatness), the narrowest form of QGEO.SYM.01; not a closure

Dependencies: QGEO.STATE.01; QGEO.MARKS.02; QGEO.SYM.01; v199_seam_state_invariance.py; v195_marks_lefschetz_character.py; v198_modular_commutator_reduction.py

Scripts: v201_seam_subprincipal_marks.py

Location: tfpt_research_contracts

Original CSV, line 273

Original ledger status

QGEO.PILLOW.01

QGEO.PILLOW.01

PILLOWCASE REDUCTION OF QGEO.SYM.01 (2026-06-15): the two separately-tracked open QGEO residuals -- QGEO.ISO.01 (v180; the carrier clock is an order-4 ISOMETRY of the seam metric) and QGEO.SUBPRIN.01 (v201; the DtN sub-principal symbol is MARK-LOCAL, the seam flat away from the mu4 marks) -- are ONE statement: 'the seam carries the uniformising flat orbifold (pillowcase) metric'; and the order-4 clock is DERIVED from cross-ratio 2 (v168), not assumed. (1) [E] EUCLIDEAN ORBIFOLD: chi_orb(S^2 with four order-2 cone points)=2-4(1-1/2)=0 => flat (Troyanov cone-metric uniformisation, unique up to scale); Gauss-Bonnet four cone deficits pi sum to 4pi=2pi chi(S^2) => int K_smooth=0 (flat away from the marks = the v201 conformal-deck residual). (2) [E] NEW LINK cross-ratio 2 => j=1728: j(lambda)=256(l^2-l+1)^3/(l^2(l-1)^2); j(2)=1728 and all six harmonic cross-ratios {2,-1,1/2} give 1728, so the square modulus (hence the order-4 clock) is a CONSEQUENCE of the cross-ratio 2 that v168 already proved. (3) [E]/[L] j=1728 <=> tau=i (square torus) <=> CM by Z[i] <=> Aut=Z/4; the only other exceptional modulus j=0 (tau=rho) gives Z/6, generic moduli only Z/2. (4) [E] explicit order-4 CM: on y^2=x^3-x the map (x,y)->(-x,iy) negates the defining polynomial (same zero locus) and has order 4 = the z->iz isometry. (5) [E] NEGATIVE CONTROL: a generic cross-ratio lambda=3 gives j=21952/9 not in {0,1728} => Aut=Z/2, no order-4 clock -- specific to mu4. (6) [I] UNIFICATION: 'seam = uniformising flat pillowcase metric' implies BOTH v201 mark-locality (flat away from marks) AND v180 QGEO.ISO.01 (z->iz isometric, from the square modulus), so the two open residuals collapse to ONE canonical-metric statement. (7) [O] does NOT close QGEO.SYM.01: the premise 'RP seam metric = the uniformising constant-curvature representative of its conformal class' stays open -- milder and more canonical than the bare isometry premise, and it SUBSUMES v201; net existence + full-cone RP remain v175's [E]. Wolfram-mirrored (chi_orb=0, cross-ratio 2 => j=1728, harmonic orbit, lemniscatic CM order 4, neg control); Klein-J modular values mpmath-numerical

Recorded status: Identity/Lattice [E]/[L] (cross-ratio 2 => j=1728 => order-4 CM clock) + premise [O] (canonical constant-curvature metric)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: Identity/Lattice [E]/[L] + premise [O]: cross-ratio 2 (v168) => j=1728 => square modulus => order-4 CM clock (DERIVED, not assumed); unifies the two open QGEO residuals (v180 ISO + v201 SUBPRIN) into ONE canonical flat-pillowcase-metric statement; does NOT close QGEO.SYM.01 (the constant-curvature representative choice stays open, milder/more canonical than the bare isometry premise)

Dependencies: QGEO.ISO.01; QGEO.SUBPRIN.01; QGEO.RIGID.01; v168_qgeo_rigidity.py; v180_clock_is_mobius.py; v201_seam_subprincipal_marks.py

Scripts: v214_seam_pillowcase.py

Location: tfpt_research_contracts

Original CSV, line 274

Original ledger status

QGEO.KILL.01

QGEO.KILL.01

BEDROCK AS A FALSIFIABLE KILL-TEST (2026-06-15): QGEO.SYM.01 (omega o rho = omega) is recast as four independently-falsifiable predictions about the raw seam DtN, NOT a proof (a foundational symmetry cannot be derived from nothing, v181/v153; Bisognano-Wichmann would presuppose the very covariance it should produce). Non-circular reduction (v198/v199/v201): omega o rho=omega <=> [rho,C]=0 for the quasi-free covariance C=1/2(1+sgn H_1); the principal symbol |k|=diag(|n|) commutes with rho=diag(i^n) exactly, so the whole residual is the bounded sub-principal M_f, and [rho,M_f]=0 <=> f has Fourier support only on modes ≡0 (mod 4); measure form = the raw Gaussian bulk quadratic form A is mu4-deck-invariant. FOUR LEVERS (carrier-side [E] green, seam-side [O] deferred): K1 EXACTLY 4 MARKS (the order-4 clock = Coxeter of W(A3)=S4 has free orbit mu4, and rank H^1 = #marks-1 = 3 = N_fam => #marks = 4 = |mu4| = e1(a); KILL if #marks!=4, b1!=3); K2 SQUARE CONFIG (cross-ratio(mu4)=2 => j=1728, Aut=Z/4; only j in {0,1728} give Aut>Z2, and clock order h(A3)=4 selects Z/4 NOT the j=0 Z/6; a generic mark set (cross-ratio 3 -> j=21952/9) has only Z/2; KILL if non-square); K3 MOD-4 SUB-PRINCIPAL SUPPORT (a mu4-mark sum has f_m=4 g_m[m≡0 mod4] => M_f block-diagonal => [rho,M_f]=0; off-character breaks it; KILL if a first-principles seam DtN has off-character weight above noise); K4 TRANSFER GAP (cusp weights {0,1/3,2/3} => transfer eigenvalues (1-w)^6={1,(2/3)^6,(1/3)^6}, gap (2/3)^6=64/729; KILL if gap!=64/729). FREEZE-BOUND: freeze_file.csv row 'seam_deck_symmetry' names the four levers (prediction+test locked, v84/v100 discipline). The DECISIVE kill is DEFERRED (QGEO.REALIZE.01): the raw P1 seam-collar DtN must yield exactly 4 square marks WITHOUT inputting them; no first-principles raw-seam construction exists yet (deferred, like axion_DM 'no test possible until the scale is closed'). Carrier-side K1-K4 are green regression guards; a KILL-TEST, NOT a closure of QGEO.SYM.01. Python-only (falsification layer like v65/v100; exact sub-parts j=1728 + gap (2/3)^6 already Wolfram-mirrored via v214/v54/v56)

Recorded status: Open (falsifiable kill-test; carrier-side K1-K4 [E], seam-side emergence deferred [O])

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: Open / falsifiable: bedrock omega o rho=omega recast as four levers (exactly 4 square marks, mod-4 sub-principal support, transfer gap (2/3)^6), freeze-bound via seam_deck_symmetry; carrier-side [E] regression guards, decisive emergence test deferred to QGEO.REALIZE.01; not a closure and not a Bisognano-Wichmann proof

Dependencies: QGEO.SYM.01; QGEO.PILLOW.01; QGEO.SUBPRIN.01; v168_qgeo_rigidity.py; v201_seam_subprincipal_marks.py; v214_seam_pillowcase.py

Scripts: v215_seam_deck_killtest.py

Location: tfpt_research_contracts

Original CSV, line 275

Original ledger status

QGEO.MARKS.03

QGEO.MARKS.03

THE FOUR MARKS EMERGE FROM GAUSS-BONNET (2026-06-15; executes the K1 lever of QGEO.KILL.01): an independent Euclidean-orbifold derivation of the seam-mark structure. (1) [E] MARK COUNT = 2 chi: Z2 branch points (cone angle pi, deficit pi) on a flat sphere (chi=2) give n*pi = 2pi*chi(S^2) = 4pi => n = 2 chi = 4 = |mu4| = e1(a) = N_fam+1; the SAME chi=2 that supplies the 8 in c3 = 1/(|Z2| 2pi chi) = 1/(8pi). (2) [E] the Euclidean sphere 2-orbifolds (chi_orb = 2-sum(1-1/m_i) = 0) are exactly (2,3,6),(2,4,4),(3,3,3),(2,2,2,2) (n<=4 since sum 1/m_i = n-2 <= n/2). (3) [E] ALL-ORDER-2 (= the |Z2| sheet branch) selects (2,2,2,2) uniquely. (4) [E] N_fam=3 selects it: rank H^1 = #marks-1 = 3 only for (2,2,2,2); the three 3-mark orbifolds give 2 families => the three generations pick the 4-mark square over the 3-mark hexagonal (3,3,3); family count and mark count are ONE fact (N_fam = #marks-1). (5) [E] the free order-4 deck selects it: only (2,2,2,2) admits a free order-4 rotation of the marks ((2,4,4) order-4 FIXES its order-4 cone points, (3,3,3)=Z3, (2,3,6)=Z6) -- three independent criteria converge. (6) [O] residual: (2,2,2,2) carries a 1-parameter modulus (the mark cross-ratio); the SQUARE (cross-ratio 2 => j=1728, v214) is selected by the order-4 carrier clock (the one irreducible, over-determined as |mu4|=h(A3)=N_fam+1). So K1 (mark count + equality) is now DERIVED; only the square modulus stays input -- does NOT close QGEO.REALIZE.01, but removes the mark COUNT from the inputs. Exact (sympy); Wolfram-mirrored

Recorded status: Identity/Lattice [E] (Gauss-Bonnet count + Euclidean-orbifold uniqueness) + premise [O] (square modulus)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: Identity/Lattice [E] + premise [O]: the mark COUNT (4 = 2 chi) and EQUALITY (all order-2) are DERIVED from Gauss-Bonnet + Z2 branch + flatness (three independent selectors: all-order-2, N_fam=3, free order-4); only the square modulus (cross-ratio 2, the order-4 clock) stays the carrier input; executes K1 of QGEO.KILL.01, does NOT close QGEO.REALIZE.01

Dependencies: QGEO.MARKS.02; QGEO.PILLOW.01; QGEO.KILL.01; AX.P1.01; v195_marks_lefschetz_character.py; v214_seam_pillowcase.py

Scripts: v216_marks_gauss_bonnet.py

Location: tfpt_research_contracts

Original CSV, line 276

Original ledger status

QGEO.EMERGE.01

QGEO.EMERGE.01

NUMERICAL EMERGENCE SCAN (2026-06-15; the numerical sibling of QGEO.MARKS.03, as v210 is to v201): with the NUMBER of marks n AND their POSITIONS free, the 4-equally-spaced (square) configuration is the joint minimiser of {clock-invariance + 3-family cohomology + transfer gap (2/3)^6} on the actual seam DtN/state. (1) [N] n=4 equally-spaced marks give a clock-invariant quasi-free state ||rho_4 C rho_4^dag - C|| ~ 1e-14. (2) [N] family count selects n=4: scanning n in {2..8}, only n-1 = 3 = N_fam (n=3 -> 2 families = the hexagonal alternative, excluded; n=5 -> 4) -- the number is not input. (3) [N] the gap: a mu4-equivariant operator is forced diagonal in the cusp basis (deck-average off-diagonal ~1e-16 for V=diag(i,-1,-i)), cusp weights {0,1/3,2/3} => transfer (1-w)^6 = {1,(2/3)^6,(1/3)^6}, gap (2/3)^6 = 64/729. (4) [N] position scan: among 4-mark configs the square minimises the defect (square ~1e-14 vs off-square ~0.4) -- the operator-level v200 theta=pi/2. (5) [N] negative controls: n=3 (Z3/hexagonal) -> 2 families + breaks the order-4 clock; n=5,6 wrong count. (6) [O] numerically confirms the emergence on the real DtN (number scanned, positions free); selector = the 3-family/gap-(2/3)^6 structure (carrier input); executes K1 numerically but does NOT close QGEO.REALIZE.01 (the order-4/N_fam input stays irreducible, v153/v181); complements v216. Python-only

Recorded status: Numerical [N] (emergence confirmation on the real DtN/state) + premise [O] (selector is carrier input)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: Numerical [N] + premise [O]: free-n + free-positions scan on the actual DtN/state confirms 4-square is the unique joint minimiser of {clock-invariance, 3 families, gap (2/3)^6}; executes K1 of QGEO.KILL.01 numerically, does NOT close QGEO.REALIZE.01; Python-only

Dependencies: QGEO.MARKS.03; QGEO.KILL.01; v200_seam_variational_scan.py; v210_mark_local_dtn.py; v216_marks_gauss_bonnet.py

Scripts: v217_marks_emergence_scan.py

Location: tfpt_research_contracts

Original CSV, line 277

Original ledger status

FR.RAREKAON.01

FR.RAREKAON.01

RARE KAON SECTOR K -> pi nu nubar FROM THE TFPT CKM POINT (2026-06-15, archive integration): the kernel fixes the full CKM matrix (s12=lambda_C, s23=phi0/(1+lambda_C)=|V_cb|, s13=lambda_C^3/3, delta=pi/3+3 lambda_C^2=1.19823 rad; v18/v88) with NO flavor fit; feeding the exact point into the standard Brod-Gorbahn-Stamou short-distance formulas gives BR(K+ -> pi+ nu nubar)=9.45e-11 and BR(K_L -> pi0 nu nubar)=3.33e-11. (1) [I] the CKM point + exact apex (rhobar,etabar)=(0.1374,0.3509) and lambda_t=V_ts* V_td. (2) [C] the branching ratios -- NOT parameter-free: X_t=1.462, P_c, dP_cu, kappa_pm are external electroweak/QCD input (recomputed from the CURRENT CKM point; an earlier scaffold quoted BR(K_L)=3.47e-11 from an Im(lambda_t)/lambda^5 slip, corrected here to 3.33e-11). (3) [N] BR(K+)=9.45e-11 lands ON the NA62 full 2016-2024 combination (9.6 +1.9/-1.8)e-11 (La Thuile 2026), +0.08 sigma (the earlier 2016-2022 obs was (13.0 +3.3/-3.0)e-11, ~1.2 sigma above); a strong consistency hit for the CKM point, but an F_transfer bridge -- NOT a unique TFPT-vs-SM discriminator (the SM (8.6 +- 0.4)e-11 also sits inside the NA62 error). (4) [I] Grossman-Nir ratio BR(K_L)/BR(K+)=0.352 << 4.3 (model-independent isospin corridor). (5) [X] dated kill test: a stable NA62 BR(K+) outside [7,12]e-11, or a KOTO-II BR(K_L) off the GN-plane point, breaks the TFPT flavor bridge for this sector (compiler core untouched); the ~2 sigma delta_CKM tension (v88) makes the corridor discriminating. A downstream FLAVOR readout, guarded [C] by v187 -- NOT a compiler power. Python-only

Recorded status: Physical bridge [C] (CKM point [I], branching ratios external-SD [C], dated kill test [X])

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: Physical bridge [C]: the TFPT CKM point (no flavor fit) + standard short-distance input give BR(K+)=9.45e-11 and BR(K_L)=3.33e-11; consistent with NA62 at ~1.2 sigma; dated kill test = stable NA62 outside [7,12]e-11 or KOTO-II off the GN point; not a compiler power

Dependencies: v18_quark_yukawa.py; v88_cp_phase_audit.py

Scripts: v202_rare_kaon.py

Location: tfpt_2_standard_model

Original CSV, line 278

Original ledger status

HOR.EHT.01

HOR.EHT.01

EHT ACHROMATIC POLARIZATION-ROTATION INTERCEPT (2026-06-15, archive integration): beta_BH(r) = Q_e^eff Q_m^eff/(256 pi^4 r^2) = 16 c3^4 (Q_e Q_m / r^2) around a horizon-scale black hole. (1) [E] the coupling 16 c3^4 = 1/(256 pi^4) EXACTLY (c3=1/8pi) -- no free coupling. (2) [E] alpha-kernel cross-link: 16 c3^4 = delta_top/3 with delta_top = 48 c3^4 = 3/(256 pi^4), the SAME top-form coefficient that fixes the alpha-kernel precision-zone correction (one row from the cosmic-birefringence seed beta_rad=phi0/4pi) -- EHT polarimetry probes the same admissibility data as the alpha row, projected onto the local horizon collar. (3) [C] TFPT fixes the structured 1/r^2 profile, the achromaticity (no lambda^2 dependence), and the sign-flip under effective E.B reversal; the amplitude Q_e^eff Q_m^eff (local effective E.B structure) is an MHD/GR weight, NOT a compiler output -- so the channel is [C] (shape/sign), never a parameter-free pixel amplitude. (4) [X] dated kill test: the residual intercept chi_0^res = chi_0^obs - chi_0^GRMHD must pass THREE nulls simultaneously (frequency/achromatic, spatial 1/r^2, sign-flip under E.B reversal); a residual statistically consistent with zero after honest GRMHD subtraction, or failing any null, falsifies THIS channel -- the compiler core (the determinant-line coupling shared with alpha/beta_rad) is untouched. Scope: the old UFE closed RN-type metric (D/r^4, regular cores, shadow shift) is NOT imported -- superseded by the Nariai/seam=horizon readouts (v101-v104, v190); only the polarization signature survives. Wolfram-mirrored (the coefficient identity 16 c3^4 = 1/(256 pi^4) = delta_top/3 is exact)

Recorded status: Identity [E] (coupling 16 c3^4=1/(256 pi^4)=delta_top/3) + physical bridge [C] (1/r^2 shape, achromaticity, sign-flip) + dated kill test [X] (three nulls)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: Identity [E]: the EHT polarization coupling 16 c3^4 = 1/(256 pi^4) = delta_top/3 is the SAME compiler number as the alpha-kernel correction; the 1/r^2 shape + achromaticity + sign-flip are TFPT-fixed [C], the amplitude an MHD/GR weight; dated [X] kill test = three nulls after honest GRMHD subtraction; NOT the UFE metric (Nariai/seam=horizon supersedes it)

Dependencies: AX.P1.01; HOR.01; EM.FP.01

Scripts: v203_eht_achromatic.py

Location: tfpt_horizon_readouts

Original CSV, line 279

Original ledger status

QGEO.VARI.02

QGEO.VARI.02

THE DISCRETISED VARIATIONAL TEST (work package B, external-review, 2026-06-14): v196 showed E_fail=0 at the mu4 config on the fixed H^1 block; here the clock angle is a FREE parameter and E_fail is MINIMISED over it. (1) [N] taking rho(theta)=diag(e^{i m theta}) on the H^1 generators m=(1,2,3) and E_fail(theta)=||rho(theta)^4-1||^2 + faithfulness penalty (penalising coincident characters), a scan over theta in (0,pi) has its UNIQUE minimum at theta=pi/2 (E_fail=0): there rho^4=1 AND the three characters i,-1,-i are distinct = the (1,2,3)=A3-exponent grading. (2) [N] decoys lose: theta->0 is trivial (one character), theta->pi gives only two distinct characters (m=1,3 coincide at -1), generic pi/3 and 2pi/3 give E_fail~6 -- so argmin E_fail = the mu4 normal form, no other clock reproduces the faithful order-4 mu4 grading. (3) [E] consistent with v196/v199: theta=pi/2 is the clock z|->iz whose principal-symbol commutator vanishes (v198) and whose H^1 covariance is mu4-equivariant (v177); E_fail=0 there reproduces the v196 finite-block vanishing. (4) [O] this is a numerical sign on the finite H^1 grading, not the full operator-valued minimisation over the raw-seam DtN on the continuum (the v199 bounded-sub-principal residual); strengthens the case that the variational principle selects mu4 but does not close it. Python-only (numerical variational scan)

Recorded status: Numerical sign [N] (argmin = mu4 clock) + open full minimisation [O]

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: Numerical [N]: argmin E_fail over the clock angle = theta=pi/2 (the mu4 clock z|->iz), decoys lose; a numerical sign that the variational principle selects mu4; full operator-valued minimisation stays the v199 residual [O]

Dependencies: QGEO.VARI.01; QGEO.STATE.01; v196_seam_energy_functional.py; v199_seam_state_invariance.py

Scripts: v200_seam_variational_scan.py

Location: tfpt_research_contracts

Original CSV, line 280

Original ledger status

REVIEW.MAP.01

REVIEW.MAP.01

THE FOUR EXTERNAL-REVIEW CONCERNS REDUCE TO THE TWO ALREADY-NAMED RESIDUALS + ONE DATA-ONLY ITEM (a careful 2026-06-14 review raised A mapping 2D->4D, B UV-gravity abstractness, C grammar-tuning/meta-look-elsewhere, D Koide Mobius flow; this maps them honestly): three reduce by the same discipline as v175-v181 onto {QGEO.SYM.01 (the seam realisation), F_transfer (the continuous transfer functor / missing dynamical principle)}, and the fourth is experiment-only. (A) MAPPING [I]/[C]: the readout integer is exact -- the Plucker norm 11 = sum_{k<=2}C(4,k) = 1+4+6 = dim S+ - g_car = 16-5 (the QBL-protected boundary state count, v174); the 2D->4D step is the holographic reduction (bulk measure -> seam-boundary measure, gap-decoupled G5, Delta_eff>0); so A = QGEO.SYM.01 + F_transfer, NOT a new gate. (B) UV GRAVITY [I]: the TFPT answer 'gravity is the geometric readout of the boundary' IS QGEO.SYM.01 (the seam conformal deck); B is the bedrock postulate itself, an identity not a new premise. (C) GRAMMAR TUNING [N]/[C]: the strongest honest defence -- the grammar is FROZEN pre-data (v84/REG.FREEZE.01), minimal (anchor a + pi), and OVER-DETERMINED (the same anchor a=(1,1,2) lands in >=6 mutually-independent not-selected-for structures: Nariai roots (1,1,-2) HOR.NARIAI.01; Coxeter-30=|Z2|N_fam g_car SEAM.CYCLE.01; spine tetrahedron {2,3,4,5} ARCH.SPINE.01; EM budget 41=a^T K a; seed 4/3=|mu4|/N_fam; c3=1/(2 e1(a) pi)); a look-elsewhere-resistant signature, but -- the review is correct -- the residual meta-risk falls only to out-of-sample data (JUNO/CMB-S4), never to argument. (D) KOIDE MOBIUS FLOW [I]/[C]: the Mobius nature is not arbitrary -- Aut(P^1)=PSL(2,C) is the Mobius group and the Koide/cusp flow lives on the deck P^1 minus mu4, so its generator is Mobius BY THE GEOMETRY; the non-integer flow time t~2.84 (FR.KOIDE.06) only locates the physical point; the missing QFT RG generator (the beta-function realising the orbit) IS F_transfer; so D = QGEO.SYM.01 + F_transfer, not a new gate. NET: A/B/D collapse onto {QGEO.SYM.01, F_transfer}; C is the single experiment-only meta-question. A unification of the concern structure, NOT a closure of the underlying premises (which stay [O]/[C], honestly)

Recorded status: Reduction map [I]/[C] (A/B/D reduce to the two named residuals; C is experiment-only)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: Reduction [I]/[C]: external-review concerns A/B/D reduce to {QGEO.SYM.01; F_transfer}; C is data-only (JUNO/CMB-S4)

Dependencies: QGEO.SYM.01; FR.KOIDE.06; FR.ETAB.02; AUDIT.NULLMC.01; REG.FREEZE.01; QFT.FOCK.01; HOR.NARIAI.01; SEAM.CYCLE.01

Scripts: v182_reviewer_residual_map.py

Location: tfpt_5_redteam

Original CSV, line 281

Original ledger status

FR.ETAB.02

FR.ETAB.02

ETA_B LEPTOGENESIS TRANSFER OPERATIONALISED (the Tier-3 F_transfer Boltzmann path made falsifiable; NOT a new structural class, NOT a compiler theorem): type-I thermal leptogenesis eta_B ~ 0.96e-2 eps_1 kappa_f (sphaleron a_sph=28/79) fed by TFPT's neutrino sector -- normal ordering (m2,m3 from dm2_sol,dm2_atm) and the predicted phase delta_CP=4pi/3=240deg (|sin|=0.866). (1) Davidson-Ibarra eps_1=(3/16pi)M1 m3/v^2 ~ 8.5e-7 for M1=1e10 GeV [scenario M1]; (2) efficiency kappa_f(m~1) (Buchmueller-Di Bari-Pluemacher) ~ 0.03-0.19 for m~1 in [m_*, m_atm] [scenario washout]; (3) KILL TEST: over natural M1 in [3e9,3e10] GeV and m~1 in [m_*,m_atm], eta_B spans [8.4e-11, 4.7e-9] which BRACKETS the observed 6.1e-10 -- the canonical point (M1=1e10, m~1=5e-3, delta=240deg) gives 6.0e-10 (NOT tuned). So the leptogenesis route fed by TFPT's neutrino sector REACHES the observed asymmetry; but M1 and the washout are SCENARIO inputs (not TFPT outputs), so eta_B stays [C] -- a falsifiable transfer interface, NOT promoted. If a precise Boltzmann/RGE computation excluded the window, the leptogenesis ROUTE falls, NOT the theory (the downstream Omega_b readout FR.ETAB.01 is independent and already hit). Seesaw RGE running (PyR@TE) = an O(1) correction, flagged. Python-only

Recorded status: Physical [C] (viable falsifiable scenario; M1/washout scenario inputs)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: Physical [C]: thermal-leptogenesis route viable (band brackets observed 6.1e-10); M1/washout scenario inputs, eta_B stays [C]

Dependencies: FR.ETAB.01; FLAV.RGSTAB.01; v9_neutrino_texture.py

Scripts: v169_etaB_boltzmann_interface.py

Location: tfpt_4_frontier

Original CSV, line 282

Original ledger status

E8.SLICE.01

E8.SLICE.01

E8 SLICE COMPRESSION LEMMA (the seven E8 audit slices are ONE projection of two small alphabets; anti-numerology compression, NOT new physics): (1) the anchor power sums p_n(a)=2+2^n give P=(3,4,6,10) whose K4 edge products are all carrier blocks (12=|R(A3)|, 18=N_fam|R+(A3)|, 30=h(E8), 24=|W(A3)|, 40=|R(D5)|, 60=D_start; triples 120,240,720) [I]; (2) the six Sheet-Diamond operators Q,K,R,C,L,F have determinants (3,4,8,14,20,32) summing to 81=N_fam^4 -- the total determinant charge of the flavour space [I]; (3) all SEVEN E8 248-slices (D8, D5xA3, E6xA2, E7xA1, F4xG2, A4xA4, A8) are written from P, D, Delta=p0+p3=13 and (e1,e2,dim S+) [I]; (4) one affine map row(C+sU+tV)=(7,11,13)+s(3,3,3)+t(1,2,3) generates every flavour row budget (democratic winding + A3 exponents) [I]; (5) dim E6 = 78 = p2*Delta = |R+(A3)|(N_fam+A_Lambda) [I]. The E8 atlas is thus a closed grammar over two typed alphabets, not seven trophy lists; the physical reading is AUDIT

Recorded status: Identity/Lattice [I]/[L] (exact integer/lattice identities)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: Identity/Lattice [I]/[L]: E8 atlas = projection of power-sum + determinant alphabets; audit bridge, anti-numerology

Dependencies: ARCH.SPINE.01; FLAV.KQ.01; CAR.SM.01

Scripts: v170_diamond_slice_compression.py

Location: tfpt_3

Original CSV, line 283

Original ledger status

QFT.OSMOMENT.01

QFT.OSMOMENT.01

ATOMIC OS MOMENT LEMMA + SUGAWARA GAP SAFETY (the admissible transfer sector's OS positivity as a positive moment problem, and its gap as an E8 Sugawara inequality): (1) spec(T)={1,(2/3)^6,(1/3)^6}={1,64/729,1/729} makes every scalar two-point correlator C(n)=A+B r^n+C s^n the moment sequence of the positive atomic measure A d1+B dr+C ds, so every OS Hankel matrix factorises as a Vandermonde Gram H=W diag(A,B,C) W^T => positive semidefinite (positive spectrum => moment measure => reflection positivity; a clean proof, not a numerical Gram test) [I]; (2) H=-log T gives a positive discrete Kallen-Lehmann spectrum {0, 6log(3/2), 6log3} with masses m1=2.43279, m2=6.59167 [I]; (3) the exact cluster constant 1/(1-r)=729/665 and correlation length xi=1/(6log(3/2))=0.41105 [I]; (4) SUGAWARA GAP SAFETY: 31=1+h^v(E8)=1+30 and c((E8)1)=248/31=8, so Delta_eff=6log(3/2)-31/(4pi^2)=1.64755>0 reads as |R+(A3)|log(N_fam/|Z2|) > (1+h^v(E8))/(4pi^2) -- the A3 transfer gap beats the E8 Sugawara metric budget

Recorded status: Identity [I] (moment/spectral/Sugawara exact) + [C] (declared V_metric norm)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: Identity [I]: OS positivity = positive moment problem; Sugawara gap safety 31=1+h^v(E8); cluster 729/665, xi=0.411

Dependencies: GATE.METRIC.XI.01; SEAM.CYCLE.01; GATE.METRIC.07

Scripts: v171_os_moment_cluster.py

Location: tfpt_research_contracts

Original CSV, line 284

Original ledger status

SEED.ANOMALY.01

SEED.ANOMALY.01

TRACE-ANOMALY ORIGIN OF THE SEED PREFACTOR 4/3 + the shared integer 7 (b3 = scalaron exponent): (1) the retained seed phi0=(4/3)c3+48 c3^4 has base (4/3)c3=1/(6pi); the prefactor 4/3 is the conformal Weyl anomaly of the seam CFT -- over S^2 (chi=2) the (E8)1 (c=8) trace anomaly is c*chi/6=8/3, halved by the one-sided |Z2| Moebius identification to 4/3 = dim S+/dim g_SM = 16/12; the Cabibbo seed prefactor IS the halved (E8)1 Weyl anomaly [I]; (2) the QCD one-loop coefficient |b3|=11-(2/3)N_f=7 (N_f=2 N_fam=6) equals the scalaron exponent 7=Omega_adm-10 b1=48-41 (M_scal=c3^{7/2} Mbar) -- confinement (Lambda_QCD) and inflation (scalaron) are driven by ONE integer (the carrier occupancy deficit) [I]; (3) AUDIT: the external Volkov-Wipf Nariai graviton/ghost coefficient -98/45 (v138) = -2*7^2/45 = -2 (scalaron exp)^2/dim(D5) (dim so(10)=45). Gives the seed prefactor and the QCD/scalaron integer a first-principles CFT/QFT origin, not a fit

Recorded status: Identity [I] (trace anomaly + b3 + VW factorisation exact)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: Identity [I]: seed 4/3 = halved (E8)1 Weyl anomaly on S^2; b3=7=scalaron exponent (confinement<->inflation)

Dependencies: CAR.SM.01; FR.MPME.01; ANCHOR.GEN.01; v138_vw_firewall.py

Scripts: v172_trace_anomaly_seed.py

Location: tfpt_2

Original CSV, line 285

Original ledger status

FLAV.STRONGCP.02

FLAV.STRONGCP.02

STRONG CP AS PFAFFIAN REALITY (theta_eff=0 as a model-level CAR/Pfaffian theorem; formalises the tfpt_2 structural chain): in the self-dual CAR (16-Majorana) seam model, (1) the sheet-odd Calderon involution {D_Sigma, Sigma}=0 forces the spectrum into +-lambda pairs [I] (verified: eigenvalues symmetric about 0 to 1e-15); (2) gamma5-Hermiticity D^dag=gamma5 D gamma5 makes conj(det D)=det D, so the fermion-measure Pfaffian is real, arg in {0, pi} [I] (verified: Im(det D)~1e-9); (3) a theta-term gives Z(theta)=e^{i theta}|det D|; reflection positivity (Z>0, OS axiom) excludes theta=pi (Re Z<0) and every theta not in {0,pi} (Im Z != 0), selecting theta_eff=0 [I]. So theta_eff=0 is a topological null theorem -- the antisymmetric Calderon pairing makes the Pfaffian real and RP picks the positive branch; the CAR/Pfaffian form of the polar+gamma5+sheet+RP derivation

Recorded status: Formalised [F] (machine-checked model demonstration)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: Formalised [F]: theta_eff=0 via Pfaffian reality (sheet pairing + gamma5-Hermiticity + RP positive branch)

Dependencies: FLAV.QGEO.02; CAR.QFREE.01; GATE.METRIC.13

Scripts: v173_pfaffian_cp_car.py

Location: tfpt_2

Original CSV, line 286

Open questions preserve their achieved subresults

Each research problem has its own scope. A resolved task does not close its whole physical parent. Historical tasks remain explicitly historical in the source record.

Future quotient and positive GNS reconstruction

What is determined by complete future behavior, and what additional positive word-kernel source is needed to reconstruct a cyclic operator realization?

  • Resolved in scope: Future quotient from complete rRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Conditional GNS reconstruction from supplied KRead result
  • open: Select complete K from the original source
Historical: common source, state and event selection

Outside the active mathematical research program since the user's23Oct2026 decision. Historical question: Do the original principles derive a common physical source together with its state, dynamical events, and physically observed fields?

Seam connection and family action

Does the joint discrete theorem determine a concrete connection and a family coupling compatible with the determinant seam action?

  • Resolved in scope: Separate classes from actual transportRead result
  • open: Derive the common connection from the original source
Physical time and complete transfer

Do the original reflection/projector structures determine the full physical time generator and required field transfer?

  • Resolved in scope: Reuse the sign-projector counterexampleRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Reuse conditional full-transfer reconstructionRead result
  • open: Identify the physical complete TFPT transfer
  • Resolved in scope: Reuse complete collar reconstructionRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Classify homogeneous GKLS embedding of the shared register familyRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Decide every homogeneous GKSL logarithm of the fixed M4 channelRead result
Flavor ratio and absolute amplitude scale

Which flavor quantity is fixed on the derived discrete stratum, and which requires the continuous holonomy anchor?

  • Resolved in scope: Reuse the derived flavor ratioRead result
  • open: Determine the absolute holonomy amplitude
Alpha: derived terms, unique root and physical EM identification

Where do the factors and closed alpha equation come from, which provenance steps are proved, and which precise physical EM identification remains open?

  • Resolved in scope: Separate root calculation from source selectionRead result
  • open: Derive the actual EM functional variation and Thomson identification
  • Resolved in scope: Establish the unique global positive rootRead result
Geometric flow and gravity normalization

Do common matter-only observations derive geometric horizon flow and the area response from the original gravity source?

  • Resolved in scope: Record scope of fixed original functionalRead result
  • open: Derive geometric modular response and area coefficient
Clocks and complete neutral source response

Which complete quadratic response can the actual clock images reconstruct?

  • Resolved in scope: Reconstruct all neutral quadratic matrix directionsRead result
  • open: Derive physically admissible probe access
Clock action on charge, time and quarter transition

How does the actual Gaussian J act on the complete marked source?

  • Resolved in scope: Construct original J lift with complete time/charge actionRead result
  • open: Derive physical meaning of the frame orbit
Which responses distinguish charged time action?

Which data separate sources with identical complete neutral vacuum response?

  • Resolved in scope: Determine twist blindness completelyRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Reconstruct twist from charged responsesRead result
  • open: Derive actual charged source probes
Which seam action distinguishes native opposite charges?

Can existing native charge fields produce the quarter-twist time response of the seam?

  • Resolved in scope: Check native fields and response discriminatorRead result
  • open: Derive actual marked seam/state action
Constructive seam search: operators, state and source compatibility

What does the complete phase search decide, and which additional state information prevents a false source solution?

  • Resolved in scope: Finite search closed, actual winding and parity equivalenceRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Positive finite-word state extensionRead result
  • Resolved in scope: E8 current group conditionally determines the P signRead result
  • Resolved in scope: The same shift functional hides distinct ground statesRead result
  • Resolved in scope: No phase hit realizes the unchanged sourceRead result
Which partner actually belongs to the original seam?

Which charge, state type and time action belong to the root partner and original sheet pairing?

  • Resolved in scope: Concrete pair operator; source neutrality is not hypercharge neutralityRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Fixed quarter time splits the color/weak multipletRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Explicit conjugation for the existing sheet pairingRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Actual partner map between quarter domainsRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Bilinear sheet pairing is not Hermitian kernel selectionRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Actual quarter conjugation transports the supplied markingRead result
  • Resolved in scope: No time-stabilizing orthogonal repair of the fixed markingRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Spinor16 is a state sector, not a 16-real one-particle fieldRead result
Automated construction of operator maps and sources

Which tools generate operator maps, learn counterexamples, and can search for the full positive source?

  • Resolved in scope: Calibrate new search without supplying the target mapRead result
  • open: Synthesize a joint field, marking and transfer dictionary
  • open: Search for the positive common source kernel itself
  • Resolved in scope: Automatically construct, certify and distinguish finite kernelsRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Repair search conditions against source types and collar controlsRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Reconstruct multi-field sewing of the canonically identified boundary sourceRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Retain absolute reference amplitude in searchRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Integrate supplied free source including boundary response and scalarRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Convert the full finite CAR kernel into a link functionalRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Close original recursive word reconstruction with memoryRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Retain whole original caller through scale and readoutRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute actual shared Higgs source with full matter words and local RPRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Reduce whole constant original Higgs spectral fiberRead result
  • open: Resolve original geometric Higgs residue sign and field map
  • Resolved in scope: Evaluate local original Higgs heat identification and whole finite consumerRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute whole variable bound Higgs reference and original scale mapRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute whole inner Higgs scale/source and normal kernel transportRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute given whole superconnection and normal spectral readerRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Determine own-admissibility and whole total-chiral spectral readersRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Derive whole scale-energy map,normal profile and relative flowRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute original Green energy producer and mixed scale readoutRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Match current action argument and common Higgs/gravity weightsRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute whole original curvature consumers and Higgs radial sourceRead resultRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute original whole four-ghost source and geometric type testRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute original moving normal kernel derivative and whole source responseRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Decide fixed original O1 source and normal operator placementRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Compare whole Higgs mixture and covariance reader on invariant four-field witnessRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Test exact bounded cutoff on whole ordinary Higgs volumeRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Test whole original circle joint mode and IR Higgs normalizationRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Test original O1 mode covariance against whole Higgs-law classRead result
  • open: Reconstruct original localization from the whole process
  • Resolved in scope: Test bare native-code word compression against actual localityRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Decide original geometric local-time class and execute actual interval readerRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute actual regional two-face partner and supported charged wordRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute original color marginal, modular field law and complete class readerRead resultRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Reconstruct common Higgs law from whole original quarter source towerRead resultRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute original record action on Doily and ordered whole source responseRead resultRead resultRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Locally implement original record process and test unchanged exterior sourceRead resultRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute original elliptic insertion,whole source and causal responseRead resultRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Evaluate actual joint Higgs and color group sourceRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute whole original graph color reader with typed original center selectorRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute original color fixed source and first inherited grading testRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute actual original color-spinor CAR four-word and complete spin-sector sewingRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Decide actual color admissibility of density operations and coordinate regionsRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute actual whole seam-operation class and two-face responseRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute entire original C6 word expansion with source amplitudeRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute original collective Higgs force source and entire mean dualRead resultRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute original all-mode force with actual time and whole sourceRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute original local space/time force source and causal liftRead resultRead result
Origin reverse selection, field dictionary and original P1 kernel

What does reverse selection of P1/P2 give for concrete local fields and multi-field responses, and which identification with the original P1 kernel has actually been proved?

Observable reality: minimal conditions and counterworlds

Which operational conditions are independently required, which inequivalent models satisfy them, and which observable distinctions remain for selection?

Formal carrier core: unbounded Pascal uniqueness and finite glue

Which carrier and glue statements are already present in the papers and Lean sources, and which physical selection does not follow?

  • Resolved in scope: Classify the unbounded Pascal proofRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Classify the formal finite glue scopeRead result
Active mathematical program: marked seam monodromies and lattice lifts

Which marked seam/lattice transport geometries, lift classes and local-coefficient invariants arise from existing clock/reflection/quartic data? First complete case: sign lifts of fourJ representation on CP1 minusμ4.

  • Resolved in scope: Define marked seam category and factor formulaRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Completely classify quarter-clock four-puncture liftsRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Determine central class and all subgroup restrictionsRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Determine full G0 cocycle and classRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Determine native4/5/6local cohomologyRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Classify unrestricted G31 reflection monodromiesRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Determine lift class beyond G0Read result
  • open: Classify additional reflection/clock equivariance and mapping-class quotients
  • Resolved in scope: Equivariant lifting and divisibility by eightRead result
  • Resolved in scope: All62clock obstructions and central transport variantsRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Actual group comparison and central pushout exclusionRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Complete invariants and explicit collisionsRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Compare E6 and E7 slices with the actual quarter clockRead resultRead resultRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Classify original character-valued G31monodromy liftsRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Determine E7-pair action on all original lattice fieldsRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Completely connect E6/E7 cuts to the original compilerRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Compare common covers and actual clock carriersRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Prove shared representation consequence for48,4/3 and5/4Read result
  • Resolved in scope: Completely decide joint compiler-field-cover constructionRead resultRead resultRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Reconstruct canonical local compiler field source from C4Read resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Eliminate redundant sector and multiplicity assumptionsRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Classify native equivariant markingsRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Classify pure quarter clock mapping class quotientRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Determine complete cut algebra and lossless tetrahedron transformRead resultRead resultRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Completely compare scalar glue and actual native compiler classRead resultRead resultRead resultRead result
Common clock sectors, quartic geometry and operational reconstruction

Which previously separate data of the original TFPT core follow from a common clock and representation geometry, and which complete finite measurement classification follows without asserting physical source selection?

Automatic response search with original-source decision

Which additional joint response actually follows from original source equations, and which entire finite process family remains undecided without it?