Skip to main content
Back to the knowledge atlas

Original claim records.

The original technical record remains available here. For explanations, reviewed conclusions and the history of research questions, start with the knowledge atlas.

Research snapshot 2026-11-02 · 783 active ledger claims · 710 scientific findings · 707 registered scripts. These are different inventories, not counts of independent physical confirmations.

What does this inventory cover?

Every one of the 783 active ledger IDs is included. All 788 ledger rows, including superseded rows, remain in the download. The reviewed research corpus contains 711 findings; 1 administrative record is excluded from public scientific content, with the omission recorded in the coverage file.

The scientific findings include 519 established scoped results, 63 conditional results and 128 scoped exclusions. These labels describe the recorded finding. They do not upgrade its parent physical goal or overwrite the original ledger.

Sources were matched to their recorded hashes and line ranges at this snapshot. Bounded text excerpts make sources available even when a source is not in the earlier public release. Any omitted administrative lines are explicitly marked. This is source coverage, not a new execution of Python, Lean or Wolfram proofs.

Atlas revision 2c1b559b738e5740ecfad8e6 · snapshot SHA256 68c2fe33ce86d45a99a8c21b1e731e40749d0accb3ae69be53d198cd7ebcb48e

1493 matching records · page 15 of 75

Original ledger status

QFT.FOCK.01

QFT.FOCK.01

SEAM FOCK-SPACE READINGS (three exact audit bridges that sharpen the QFT/topological reading of already-used objects): (1) CAR CONE COMPRESSION [I] -- the even CAR algebra of the 16 seam Majoranas has dim Lambda^even(R^16)=2^15=32768 directions (cumulant blocks C(16,4)=1820, C(16,6)=8008, C(16,8)=12870), but a quasi-free Bogoliubov transport is the second quantisation Gamma(t)|_Lambda^m=Lambda^m(t), so the whole cone is generated by the 16-dim one-particle spectrum, compression 2^15/16=2048=2^11 (the explicit count behind v161; 'the QFT cone is large but not independent'); (2) WITTEN INDEX = PLUCKER NORM 11 [I] -- the 4 mu4-corner fermions span a 2^4=16=dim S+ Fock space; QBL (degree<=2) keeps sum_{k<=2}C(4,k)=1+4+6=11=||Pl(K)||_1, discards C(4,3)+C(4,4)=5=g_car, so 11=dim S+ - g_car and the quark ratio c_u/c_d=g_car*11/(N_fam^2*Delta_Q)=55/117 reads the QBL-protected boundary state-space dimension (a topological Witten index, not a free integer); (3) AFFLECK-LUDWIG g-THEOREM RIGIDITY [I]/[L] -- c_UV=c((D5)1)+c((A3)1)=5+3=8=c_IR((E8)1), so Delta c=0 along the seam boundary RG flow; a flow needs Delta c>0 to dissipate, so Delta c=0 forces an exact isometry (no relevant/marginal perturbation), the boundary-entropy form of the v157/v158 rigid fixed point. Exact identities; readings audit

Recorded status: Identity/Lattice [I]/[L] (cone count + Witten index + central-charge conservation)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: Identity/Lattice [I]/[L]: CAR cone 2^15->2^11; Witten index 11=Plucker norm=dim S+ - g_car; g-theorem Delta c=0 rigidity

Dependencies: GATE.UWALL.06; CAR.QFREE.01; GATE.METRIC.14; v42_exterior_leg.py; v161_one_particle_reduction.py

Scripts: v174_seam_fock_readings.py

Location: tfpt_2;tfpt_5_redteam

Original CSV, line 287

Original ledger status

QFT.NETRP.01

QFT.NETRP.01

NET EXISTENCE + FULL-CONE RP DISCHARGED TO [F] (the heavy artillery; the 'three open QFT theorems' are two [F] + one irreducible [O], nothing fabricated): (1) FULL-CONE REFLECTION POSITIVITY FOR ALL m [F] -- the CAR second-quantisation functor Gamma(t)=(+)_m Lambda^m(t) of the one-particle seam contraction t acts on the COMPLETE Fock space Lambda^*(R^16) (dim 2^16=65536); by the exterior-power spectrum theorem every eigenvalue of Gamma(t) is a subset product of spec(t), verified on all 2^16 products to be in [0,1] (contraction), with eigenvalue-1 (fixed) multiplicity 2^8=256 = wedges of the rank-8 K_Sigma polarisation and sub-leading eigenvalue = the one-particle gap (2/3)^6 -- so full-cone RP/gap reduce, for ALL m (not just m<=6, v161), to the one-particle contraction (Shale-Stinespring CAR functor + quasi-free positivity); the v160 scope premise is DISCHARGED by a theorem; (2) A2 NET EXISTENCE [F] -- the (E8)1 net exists by cited theorems (16 free Majoranas -> SO(16)_1 chiral net, Buchholz-Mack-Todorov/Boeckenhauer-Evans-Kawahigashi; holomorphic c=8 lattice net = (E8)1, Frenkel-Kac-Segal/Dong-Xu/Kawahigashi-Longo; mu4 index-4 Q-system, v125), with machine-verified data: character E4/eta^8=1+248q+4124q^2+34752q^3+213126q^4+1057504q^5 (level-1=248), embedding 248=120+128, E8 Cartan even unimodular (det 1, the unique rank-8 even unimodular lattice, Minkowski-Siegel/v83); (3) BOTH COLLAPSE TO ONE [I] -- full-cone RP -> one-particle contraction, A2 -> cited net existence, both needing the SAME input: the actual seam Calderon kernel = the gapped one-particle contraction on P^1\\mu4 = QGEO.REALIZE.01 (finite half proven, v168). (4) IRREDUCIBLE PREMISE [O] -- QGEO.REALIZE.01 (seam boundary CFT = parabolic transport on P^1\\mu4) is a constructive-geometry/AQFT statement, NOT closeable by finite computation, left OPEN (needs a human constructive-QFT/geometry argument). NET: net existence + full-cone RP are [F]; the one irreducible structural premise is the seam realisation

Recorded status: Formalised/Identity [F]/[I] (all-m functoriality + verified net data) + [O] (the seam realisation)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: Formalised [F]: full-cone RP (all m, CAR functor) + (E8)1 net existence (assembled+verified); the one [O] is the seam realisation QGEO.REALIZE.01

Dependencies: GATE.METRIC.11; GATE.METRIC.13; GATE.METRIC.16; GATE.METRIC.17; QGEO.RIGID.01; QGEO.REALIZE.01; v83_e8net_holomorphic_uniqueness.py; v125_glue_qsystem.py; v161_one_particle_reduction.py

Scripts: v175_net_existence_full_cone.py

Location: tfpt_research_contracts;tfpt_5_redteam

Original CSV, line 288

Original ledger status

FR.MUONG2.01

FR.MUONG2.01

MUON g-2 SEAM VERTEX (2026-06-15, archive integration of the old muon-g2 note, re-typed for the current kernel): the carrier fixes a second-order topological defect delta_2 = B*gamma*delta_top^2 = (5/4)delta_top^2 (delta_top=Omega_adm c3^4=48 c3^4=3/256pi^4, v2/v23; B*gamma=(3/2)(5/6)=5/4 the carrier compression quotient, v51); the seam-loop projection a_mu^seam = delta_2/(2 pi) = 45/(524288 pi^9) = 2.879e-9. (1) [E] the VALUE is an exact compiler number (trace reading delta_2 = 4! Tr_{S+}(X^2) c3^8, Tr=120=5!). (2) [C] the IDENTIFICATION of delta_2/(2 pi) as a magnetic vertex correction (the 1/2pi=4c3 seam-loop projection) is a physical bridge, NOT a theorem -- so the prediction is [C]. (3) [N] 0.81 sigma vs the dispersive Delta a_mu=(2.49+-0.48)e-9. (4) [C] HONEST: lattice/CMD-3 HVP shrinks Delta a_mu (~1.5e-9), the FIXED TFPT value then sits ~1.5 sigma high -- testable against either HVP outcome, not tuned to the dispersive one. (5) [X] dated kill test: a converged Delta a_mu outside 2.879e-9 +- 0.5e-9 excludes the seam-vertex mechanism (compiler core untouched). A downstream readout, NOT a compiler power. Wolfram-mirrored (the value is exact). (6) KILL FIRED 2026-08-04 (news round): the lattice-side HVP consensus consolidated -- WP25 (Phys. Rep. 2025) adopts the lattice HVP as the SM baseline and the BMW hybrid evaluation (Nature 2026) confirms it, Experiment - SM = 0.5 sigma, i.e. Delta a_mu converged OUTSIDE 2.879e-9 +- 0.5e-9: the seam-vertex identification is excluded in its present form (the dated kill (5) fired exactly as preregistered). The bridge is dissolved; the exact compiler number (1) [E] and the compiler core are untouched -- the watchdog delivered

Recorded status: Physical bridge KILLED: dated kill test [X] fired 2026-08-04 (exact value stays [E]; the [C] vertex identification is excluded in its present form -- bridge dissolved, compiler core untouched)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: Physical bridge KILLED [X] fired 2026-08-04: a_mu^seam = delta_2/(2 pi) = 45/(524288 pi^9) = 2.879e-9 stays an exact value [E], but the WP25+BMW lattice-HVP consensus (Experiment - SM = 0.5 sigma) puts the converged Delta a_mu outside 2.879e-9 +- 0.5e-9 -- the [C] vertex identification is excluded in its present form; bridge dissolved, compiler core untouched; not a compiler power

Dependencies: v2_carrier_pascal.py; v23_anchor_generator.py; v51_boundary_half_step.py

Scripts: v204_muon_seam_g2.py

Location: tfpt_4_frontier

Original CSV, line 289

Original ledger status

GRAV.XI.01

GRAV.XI.01

GRAVITATIONAL 3/4 OVER-DETERMINATION (2026-06-15, archive integration of the old Eliminating-K note): the torsion-compression ansatz kappa^2 = xi phi0/c3^2 with the Einstein limit kappa^2=8 pi G fixes xi = 8 pi c3^2/phi0 = c3/phi0 (since 8 pi c3^2 = c3), and at tree level phi_tree=1/(6 pi) this is EXACTLY 3/4. (1) [E] tree identity xi = c3/phi_tree = (1/8pi)/(1/6pi) = 3/4. (2) [E] Einstein-limit reduction 8 pi c3^2 = c3 => G drops out, G is an output not an input. (3) [E] OVER-DETERMINATION: 3/4 = q(A3) = N_fam/|mu4| = ln(m/mu) (v152 k=c3/2) -- the torsion-compression xi and the gapped EH replica are two structurally independent appearances of the same gravitational 3/4. (4) [N] with the retained seed xi=c3/phi0=0.748303 (-0.226%). (5) [C] the kappa^2=xi phi0/c3^2 ansatz is the [C] bridge; the modern derivation of 3/4 is v152/v68, xi is no new free parameter, 1/G stays the one declared anchor (v60/v153). Wolfram-mirrored (tree identity + over-determination exact)

Recorded status: Identity [E] (tree 3/4 + over-determination) + physical bridge [C] (the kappa^2 ansatz)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: Identity [E]: xi = c3/phi_tree = 3/4 = q(A3) = ln(m/mu) -- an independent route to the gravitational 3/4; the kappa^2=xi phi0/c3^2 ansatz is the [C] bridge, G is a metrology output, 1/G the one anchor

Dependencies: v152_norm_is_anchor.py; v68_seeley_dewitt_residual.py; v60_lambda_metrology_branch.py

Scripts: v205_xi_threequarter.py

Location: tfpt_4_frontier

Original CSV, line 290

Original ledger status

GRAV.H0.01

GRAV.H0.01

COSMOLOGICAL-CONSTANT BRANCH H0 = 66.5..67.1 (2026-06-15, archive integration of the tfpt-31 CC note; sharpens the qualitative H0-vs-Lambda row): the seam number delta_Sigma = m_1 e^{-2 pi alpha^-1/3} with the lowest-block m_1=Omega_adm=48. (1) [N] delta_Sigma^lead = 48 e^{-2 pi*137.036/3} ~ 1.085e-123. (2) [E] convention split M_Pl^4/Mbar^4 = (8 pi)^2 = 631.65 (unreduced vs reduced Planck density -- must be displayed). (3) [N] rho_Lambda = M_Pl^4 delta_Sigma ~ 2.4e-47 GeV^4 (observed vacuum order). (4) [N] 123-orders cross-link |log10 delta_Sigma| ~ 122.96, consistent with the v60 split 122.948. (5) [C] under the flatness closure H0^lead=66.51, H0^disc=67.10 km/s/Mpc -- 1.6..0.5 sigma BELOW Planck (67.36+-0.54), ~6 sigma below SH0ES (73.0+-1.0): HONEST, the Hubble tension is NOT relieved by raising the vacuum scale; H0 uses imported Omega_b, omega_DM (external cosmology), so it is a [C] readout, not a from-nothing output. Python-only (the (8pi)^2 ratio is on the Wolfram path via v60)

Recorded status: Numerical [N] (delta_Sigma, 123-orders) + physical bridge [C] (H0 flatness readout)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: Numerical/bridge [N]/[C]: delta_Sigma=48 e^{-2pi alpha^-1/3}~1.085e-123, (8pi)^2 convention split, |log10|~122.96 (v60 consistent); H0=66.5..67.1 below Planck, does NOT relieve the Hubble tension; [C] readout (imported Omega_b, omega_DM)

Dependencies: v60_lambda_metrology_branch.py; v55_coxeter_cycle.py

Scripts: v206_h0_lambda_branch.py

Location: tfpt_4_frontier

Original CSV, line 291

Original ledger status

GRAV.ASYMP.01

GRAV.ASYMP.01

ASYMPTOTIC SAFETY -- A SECOND [P] ROUTE TO THE METRIC SECTOR (2026-06-15, archive integration of the old Five-Problems note; NOT load-bearing, does NOT close G_metric): the current theory closes QG via the discrete seam-net/AQFT programme (v175; open premise QGEO.REALIZE.01); this records a COMPLEMENTARY continuum-FRG argument that a non-Gaussian UV fixed point exists from the same axioms. Setup d_t g = (2 + eta_R(g)) g, eta_R = -a1 g (torsion K^2 positive-definite => a1>0). (1) [E] the axion coupling is fixed and small: y^2 = 16 c3^2 = 1/(4 pi^2) = 0.025330 exactly (g_agg=-4 c3 from the cubic, scale-invariant). (2) [N] existence by IVT: 2+eta_R is +2>0 as g->0 and <0 at large g (torsion damping) => a root g_*>0 (non-Gaussian UV fixed point). (3) [N] g_*=2/a1>0 finite, Reuter-type O(1), coordinates set by {c3,phi0}+field content, no new free input. (4) [O] HONEST: a continuum-FRG ansatz the discrete-compiler theory did NOT adopt; a second plausibility route only; the primary machine-checked route stays the seam-net (v175); G_metric open either way. Python-only

Recorded status: Open/plausibility [O] (a [P]-typed second QG route; not load-bearing) + [E] (y^2=16 c3^2)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: Open/plausibility [O]: a complementary continuum-FRG argument (non-Gaussian UV fixed point exists from {c3,phi0}); y^2=16 c3^2 exact; NOT load-bearing, the seam-net (v175) stays primary, G_metric open

Dependencies: v175_net_existence_full_cone.py; v28_gravity_fR.py

Scripts: v207_asymptotic_safety.py

Location: tfpt_4_frontier

Original CSV, line 292

Original ledger status

HOR.BHTHERMO.01

HOR.BHTHERMO.01

BLACK-HOLE THERMODYNAMICS FROM THE SEAM: modular Hawking temperature + scalaron-corrected Wald entropy (2026-06-15, archive integration of the dropped tfpt-42 stationary-horizons/compact-objects section, re-typed through the Tomita-Takesaki seam work v198/v199). (1) [E] MODULAR T_H: the modular flow Delta^{it}=e^{-2 pi t K_H} (Bisognano-Wichmann/Tomita-Takesaki) gives KMS at beta=2 pi and T_H = kappa/(2 pi); the 2 pi IS the seam unit 1/(4 c3) (1/2pi=4c3, v58), reproducing T_H=c3/M (v57); the seam<->horizon modular identification is [P] (ties to [rho,Lambda]=0, v198/v199). (2) [E] SCALARON WALD ENTROPY: with the induced f(R)=R+R^2/(6 M_s^2) (M_s=c3^{7/2} Mbar, v28), S_W=(f_R A)/(4 G)=(A/4G)(1+R_h/3M_s^2), f_R=1+R/(3M_s^2) -- leading A/4G is the c3 area law (1/4=1/|mu4|), the correction an EXACT scalaron consequence; BH application [P]. (3) [E] SdS T_H=(1/4pi r_h)(1-Lambda r_h^2), 1/4pi=2c3. (4) [E] area law S_BH=M^2/(2c3)=4 pi M^2=A/4G, same 1/(4c3)=2pi factor as the modular beta. Wolfram-mirrored (the f_R Wald identity + modular 2pi=1/4c3 are exact)

Recorded status: Identity [E] (modular 2pi=1/4c3, scalaron Wald factor, area law) + physical bridge [C] (the BH/modular identification)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: Identity/bridge [E]/[C]: T_H=kappa/2pi from modular flow (2pi=1/4c3); scalaron Wald entropy S_W=(A/4G)(1+R_h/3M_s^2) exact from v28; area law S_BH=A/4G; the BH/modular identification is [C]

Dependencies: AX.P1.01; HOR.01; v57_horizon_crosslinks.py; v28_gravity_fR.py; v198_modular_commutator_reduction.py

Scripts: v208_bh_thermodynamics.py

Location: tfpt_horizon_readouts

Original CSV, line 293

Original ledger status

HOR.BHCORE.01

HOR.BHCORE.01

BLACK HOLE AS A SEAM FIXED POINT (topological defect), NOT a singularity (2026-06-15, archive integration of the old Five-Problems BH picture; the SUPERSEDED torsion/RN-vortex metric is DROPPED -- RN-type metric superseded by Nariai/seam=horizon v101-v104/v190, cf. v203). Built from established suite atoms. (1) [E] NO SINGULARITY = SEAM FIXED POINT: the gapped attractor multiplier lambda_2=(2/3)^6=64/729 with gap Delta=6 log(3/2)>0 (v56) -- the core is a fixed point (d phi/dt=0), rho->inf replaced by phi->phi_* [P]. (2) [E] MAXIMAL BH = ANCHOR: Nariai cubic t^3-3t+2=(t-1)^2(t+2), roots (1,1,-2) = the traceless projection of the anchor a=(1,1,2) (a-(p1/3)1=-(1/3)(1,1,-2), p1=4; v101/v190). (3) [E] INFORMATION stays in the boundary field: Page recovery decays at lambda_2=(2/3)^6 per step (v54), no interior loss [P]. (4) [E] holographic remnant S_BH=A/4G, 1/4=1/|mu4|, a Planck-scale floor not a point singularity [P]. (5) [P] HONEST: a qualitative structural synthesis (reuses v54/v56/v57/v101/v190), NOT load-bearing, NOT a metric, the old RN/torsion metric NOT resurrected. Python-only

Recorded status: Open/synthesis [O] (a [P]-typed structural reading; not load-bearing) + [E] (the underlying anchor/attractor atoms)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: Open/synthesis [O]: BH = seam fixed point (no singularity, phi->phi_*), maximal BH = anchor (Nariai roots (1,1,-2)=traceless a), info via Page recovery (2/3)^6, Planck-scale floor; [P] reading, NOT load-bearing, RN metric not resurrected

Dependencies: v54_seam_horizon_keystones.py; v56_unique_attractor.py; v57_horizon_crosslinks.py; v101_horizon_anchor.py; v190_nariai_entropy_bound.py

Scripts: v209_bh_regular_core.py

Location: tfpt_horizon_readouts

Original CSV, line 294

Original ledger status

QGEO.MARKLOCAL.01

QGEO.MARKLOCAL.01

MARK-LOCAL DtN CERTIFIED ON REALISTIC STEKLOV PROFILES + AT THE STATE LEVEL (2026-06-15): a numerical SHARPENING of QGEO.SUBPRIN.01/v201, carried to the quasi-free STATE (the actual omega o rho = omega, not just [rho,Lambda]=0); NOT a closure of QGEO.SYM.01. v201 argued at the abstract mode level; here a real von-Mises curvature bump g(theta) localised at a puncture, summed over the four mu4 marks f(theta)=sum_{j=0}^3 g(theta-j pi/2), builds the Steklov DtN Lambda=|D_theta|+M_f. (1) [E] every off-(mod 4) Fourier coefficient of the REAL f vanishes to <1e-16 (exact 4-fold cancellation), although g itself has all modes. (2) [N] ||[rho,Lambda]||<1e-15 (principal |k| diagonal, v198; sub-principal M_f Z4-invariant). (3) [N] STATE INVARIANCE (the genuinely new step vs v201): the quasi-free covariance C=1/2(1+sgn H_1) satisfies rho C rho^dag = C to <1e-13 and [rho,C]<1e-13 -- the STATE, not just the operator, is clock-invariant. (4) [N] negative controls (a single off-centre bump, a Z3 3-mark source, 4 generic unequal marks) each break BOTH the operator and the state by O(1) -- specific to the mu4 orbit. (5) [N] convergence: mark-local commutator stays <1e-10 for N in {16,32,64}, the Z3 control stays O(1) -- not a truncation artefact. (6) [O] VERDICT: certifies the implication 'mark-local DtN => omega o rho = omega' for concrete Steklov profiles AND at the state level (the operational content of QGEO.SUBPRIN.01); the PREMISE that the physical seam DtN IS mark-local / conformal-deck flat stays [O] -- the narrowest definitional form of QGEO.SYM.01, NOT its closure (net existence + full-cone RP remain the [E] of v175). Python-only (numerical; the exact mark-sum identity is Wolfram-mirrored via v201)

Recorded status: Numerical certification [N] (implication on realistic profiles + state level) + premise [O] (the physical seam being mark-local)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: Numerical/premise [N]/[O]: mark-local DtN => omega o rho = omega certified for realistic von-Mises Steklov profiles AND at the quasi-free state level (rho C rho^dag = C to 1e-13); negative controls (off-centre, Z3, generic) break by O(1); the seam being mark-local stays [O], the narrowest form of QGEO.SYM.01, not a closure

Dependencies: QGEO.SUBPRIN.01; QGEO.STATE.01; QGEO.MODULAR.01; v201_seam_subprincipal_marks.py; v198_modular_commutator_reduction.py

Scripts: v210_mark_local_dtn.py

Location: tfpt_research_contracts

Original CSV, line 295

Original ledger status

FORM.QGEO.01

FORM.QGEO.01

LEAN 4 FORMALISATION of the QGEO.SYM.01 CONDITIONAL THEOREM (2026-06-15; the algebraic core of v201/v210, machine-proved) -- AUDIT: PASS, no sorry/admit, no domain axioms (#print axioms = propext, Classical.choice, Quot.sound only; the two block-diagonality theorems even use only propext+Quot.sound). New module TfptCarrier/SeamDeckClosure.lean proves: (1) [F] geom_sum_fourth_root: for ζ:ℂ with ζ^4=1, Σ_{j<4} ζ^j = (if ζ=1 then 4 else 0) -- the 4th-root character orthogonality (finite geometric sum) that makes a μ4-mark sum vanish off mod 4; (2) [F] clock_gen_pow_four + mark_sum_residue_nonzero: the clock generator -i has order 4 and the three non-trivial residues give a vanishing mark sum, so a μ4-mark-sourced curvature is supported only on modes ≡0 (mod 4); (3) [F] markLocal_blockDiagonal: a mark-local Toeplitz symbol (support ⊆ {m : (m:ZMod 4)=0}) connects only equal clock-characters (f_{n-n'}≠0 ⇒ (n:ZMod4)=(n':ZMod4)), i.e. [ρ,M_f]=0; (4) [O] SeamDeckPremise (structure): the PHYSICAL premise that the raw seam DtN sub-principal symbol is mark-local, encoded as a typed target exactly like CalderonProjector -- consumed, NOT proved; (5) [F] SeamDeckPremise.clock_invariant: GIVEN the premise, the clock commutes with the DtN at the character level => the quasi-free covariance C=1/2(1+sgn H1) is clock-invariant => omega o rho = omega. So the IMPLICATION mark-local => omega o rho = omega is now [F] (machine-proved); the PREMISE (the physical seam IS mark-local) stays [O] -- the one fundamental seam-identification postulate, NOT closed. Complements FORM.GLUE.01/FORM.LADDER.01; mirrors v201/v210.

Recorded status: Formal [F] (conditional theorem) + [O] (the seam-deck premise)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: Formal [F]/[O]: the QGEO.SYM.01 conditional theorem (mark-local DtN => omega o rho = omega, via 4th-root orthogonality + character block-diagonality) is Lean-proved (AUDIT: PASS, clean axioms); the seam-deck premise stays [O], a typed target like CalderonProjector -- not a closure of QGEO.SYM.01

Dependencies: QGEO.MARKLOCAL.01; QGEO.SUBPRIN.01; QGEO.MARKS.01; FORM.GLUE.01

Scripts: lean4-carrier-rigidity

Location: tfpt_research_contracts

Original CSV, line 296

Original ledger status

FORM.QGEO.02

FORM.QGEO.02

LEAN 4 FORMALISATION of QGEO.UNIFORM.01 (the geometric normal form of v177; the UNIFORM node of the QGEO proof tree) -- AUDIT: PASS, no sorry/admit, no domain axioms (only propext, Classical.choice, Quot.sound). New module TfptCarrier/MobiusUniformisation.lean machine-proves the constructive uniformisation content: (1) [F] rho_pow_four: the clock rho:z->iz has rho^4=id; (2) [F] rho_order_exactly_four: rho^2 != id (rho^2(1)=-1), so the clock has order EXACTLY 4; (3) [F] sigma_invol: the reflection sigma:z->1/z is an involution; (4) [F] sigma_rho_sigma: sigma.rho.sigma = rho^{-1} (the dihedral relation => <rho,sigma>=D4 of order 8); (5) [F] orbit_scales_to_mu4: a non-fixed point a!=0 has orbit {a,ia,-a,-ia} that scales (z->z/a) exactly to mu4={1,i,-1,-i}; (6) [F] sigma_perm_mu4: sigma permutes mu4 (fixes 1,-1; swaps i,-i); (7) [F] mult_order_four_iff: a multiplier map z->zeta z has order exactly 4 (zeta^4=1, zeta^2!=1) IFF zeta=i or zeta=-i (the two primitive 4th roots; the inversion conjugates one to the other => canonical rep z->iz). Bundled as uniformisation_normal_form; signature-locked in AuditContract.lean. SCOPE: this is the constructive normal form GIVEN the four marks + clock (the [E] UNIFORM node); the RAW-seam obligation QGEO.MARKS.01 (the seam canonically producing a genus-0 four-marked D4 boundary) stays [O], NOT closed. Mirrors v177 (QGEO.UNIFORM.01); complements FORM.QGEO.01.

Recorded status: Formal [F] (uniformisation normal form) + [O] (the raw-seam marking obligation QGEO.MARKS.01)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: Formal [F]/[O]: QGEO.UNIFORM.01 (order-4 Moebius normal form z->iz, D4 relation sigma.rho.sigma=rho^{-1}, orbit->mu4, multiplier classification zeta=+-i) Lean-proved (AUDIT: PASS, clean axioms, signature-locked); the raw-seam marking obligation QGEO.MARKS.01 stays [O]

Dependencies: QGEO.TREE.01; QGEO.MARKS.01; FORM.QGEO.01; FORM.GLUE.01

Scripts: lean4-carrier-rigidity

Location: tfpt_research_contracts

Original CSV, line 297

Original ledger status

FORM.QGEO.03

FORM.QGEO.03

LEAN 4 FORMALISATION of QGEO.COHOM.01 (the character node of v177) + the MODULE reflection parity -- AUDIT: PASS, no sorry/admit, no domain axioms (only propext, Classical.choice, Quot.sound). New module TfptCarrier/CohomologyGrading.lean machine-proves: (1) [F] the three H^1(P^1 minus mu4) eigenforms omega_k = z^{k-1}/(z^4-1) (k=1,2,3) have pullback character rho* omega_k = i^k omega_k under the clock rho:z->iz -- omega1_pullback (i^1=i), omega2_pullback (i^2=-1), omega3_pullback (i^3=-i), each an exact rational-function identity (the denominator is clock-invariant, (iz)^4-1=z^4-1 since i^4=1); (2) [F] character_grading: the eigenvalues (i,-1,-i) = the characters of weights (1,2,3) = the A3 exponents = Spec(Q_+), rank 3 = N_fam; (3) [F] the MODULE reflection parity: the reflection sigma:z->1/z (pullback g(1/z)*(-1/z^2)) satisfies sigma* omega_1 = omega_3, sigma* omega_2 = omega_2, sigma* omega_3 = omega_1 (omega1_reflection/omega2_reflection/omega3_reflection) -- the integer-model parity w1<->w3, w2 fixed (v141/v146/v177); bundled cohom_grading, signature-locked in AuditContract.lean. SCOPE: this is the geometric COHOM/MODULE-parity content GIVEN the marked curve (P^1, mu4) and the clock (the [E] middle nodes); it does NOT close QGEO.MARKS.01/QGEO.KERNEL.01, and the MODULE *uniqueness* (multiplicity-free + residue normalisation) stays the symbolic v177 reading. Mirrors v177 (QGEO.COHOM.01); complements FORM.QGEO.01/02.

Recorded status: Formal [F] (COHOM character grading + MODULE reflection parity) + [O] (the raw-seam obligations)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: Formal [F]/[O]: QGEO.COHOM.01 (pullback character rho* omega_k = i^k omega_k, grading (1,2,3)=A3 exponents) + MODULE reflection parity (sigma swaps omega1<->omega3, fixes omega2) Lean-proved (AUDIT: PASS, clean axioms, signature-locked); the MARKS/KERNEL obligations and MODULE uniqueness stay [O]

Dependencies: QGEO.TREE.01; QGEO.MARKS.01; FORM.QGEO.01; FORM.QGEO.02

Scripts: lean4-carrier-rigidity

Location: tfpt_research_contracts

Original CSV, line 298

Original ledger status

DM.AXION.SPINE.01

DM.AXION.SPINE.01

AXION DM SPINE-ANGLE BRANCH theta_i = pi N_fam/g_car = 3 pi/5 = 108 deg (2026-06-15): an ALTERNATIVE, more ROBUST misalignment angle than the determinant-line hilltop theta_i ~ 170 deg (FR.DM.03/v185, which over-produces Omega_a h^2 ~ 0.66 ~ 5.5x). (1) [I] RATIONAL MOTIVE: theta_i = pi N_fam/g_car = 3 pi/5 = 108 deg EXACTLY (the central spine quotient 3/5 = N_fam/g_car, a rational multiple of pi, NOT tuned to the relic). (2) [N] ON TARGET: the v185 converged finite-T solver (normalised theta=1 -> Omega_a h^2 ~ 0.03) reaches Omega_DM h^2 = 0.12 at theta ~ 106 deg; the spine angle 108 deg sits essentially there (~2 deg away), harmonic estimate 0.03 theta^2 = 0.107 confirms the order, a mild anharmonic factor lifts to ~0.12. (3) [C] ROBUST (the genuine advantage over v185): 108 deg lies 62 deg BELOW the 170 deg hilltop, in the MILD-anharmonic regime, so the relic is NOT exponentially sensitive -- a far more robust landing on Omega_DM; IF theta_i is the spine quotient, the determinant-line axion is ALL of dark matter without hilltop tuning. (4) [O] HONEST -- AN ALTERNATIVE ANSATZ: theta_i = 3 pi/5 (spine motive) and theta_i = pi(1-phi_seam) ~ 170 deg (seam-value motive, v185) are MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE readings of the same angle; neither is forced -- the full finite-T solver decides. A sharper SCENARIO, not a derivation; abundance is cosmology, never a compiler output. (5) [X] KILL TEST: a full finite-T solve at theta_i = 3 pi/5, f_a = M_scal/128, N_DW = 1 -- Omega_a h^2 outside ~[0.08,0.16] demotes the spine branch (compiler core untouched; the no-WIMP E8 scan is independent). Python-only. POST-INFLATIONARY REFRAMING [C] (2026-07-10, FR.DM.02): given H_inf/f_a~66>1 (R^2 branch) a FIXED pre-inflationary spine angle carries CDM isocurvature >> Planck beta_iso<0.038; in the natural POST-INFLATIONARY scenario theta_i is a HORIZON AVERAGE, NOT observable -- so 108 deg = 3 pi/5 is retained as a STRUCTURAL RATIONAL (3/5=N_fam/g_car), NOT a relic prediction; the relic follows from f_a + N_DW=|C|=1 (v470/v472). The [X] angle kill test is SUPERSEDED by the post-inflationary reading (angle not measurable).

Recorded status: Physical [C] (spine angle = structural rational / NOT observable post-inflationary; relic from f_a + N_DW=1; reframed by FR.DM.02)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: Physical [C]: theta_i = pi N_fam/g_car = 3 pi/5 = 108 deg (spine quotient) lands on Omega_DM ~106 deg ROBUSTLY (mild-anharmonic, far below the 170 deg hilltop) -- a more robust DM branch than v185; an alternative ansatz, the full solver decides; kill test outside ~[0.08,0.16] demotes the branch

Dependencies: FR.DM.01; FR.DM.02; FR.DM.03; v185_axion_relic_solver.py

Scripts: v211_axion_spine_angle.py

Location: tfpt_4_frontier

Original CSV, line 299

Original ledger status

DM.AXION.PENTAGON.01

DM.AXION.PENTAGON.01

THE 'UNMAPPED' ICOSAHEDRAL/GOLDEN E8 STRUCTURE SURFACES IN THE ONE EXTERNAL COSMOLOGICAL INPUT theta_i (2026-06-26, v429): a geometric re-reading answering the parsimony question 'why does so much idle E8 structure exist?' for the one case where the idle structure has a job. [E] THETA_I = g_car-GON INTERIOR ANGLE: because N_fam = g_car-2, the spine quotient theta_i = pi N_fam/g_car = (g_car-2)pi/g_car is EXACTLY the interior angle of the regular g_car-gon; for g_car=5 the PENTAGON, theta_i = 3 pi/5 = 108 deg (the carrier polygon, not a bare rational multiple of pi). [E] COS IS GOLDEN: cos(3 pi/5) = (1-sqrt5)/4 = -1/(2 phi), partner 2 cos(2 pi/5) = 1/phi = phi-1, phi = 2 cos(pi/5) = (1+sqrt5)/2 -- the golden ratio v354 called 'unmapped' (and v313/GOLD.ATOMS.01 named the g_car=5 signature) IS theta_i's angular data. [E] GOLDEN CHARACTER UNIQUE TO g_car=5: among small regular n-gons only n=5 has an irrational interior-angle cosine (n=3,4,6 give 1/2,0,-1/2, all rational); so theta_i is golden BECAUSE the carrier is 5 (P2). [C] BRIDGE (NO STATUS CHANGE): connects E8.REVERSE.AUDIT.01/GOLD.ATOMS.01 (phi = the unmapped g_car=5 signature) to DM.AXION.SPINE.01/v211 (theta_i = 3 pi/5 the one external input); REFINES v354 from 'phi in NO physical readout' to 'phi touches ONLY the [C] spine misalignment angle' (conditional, branch-level, never a frozen prediction); a geometric MOTIVE for the spine over the hilltop theta_i ~ 170 deg (whose cosine is not a clean pentagon value), consistent with -- not replacing -- the finite-T solver that decides the branch (v185/v211). Does NOT derive theta_i, does NOT upgrade DM.AXION.SPINE.01 (stays [C]), closes no gate. Wolfram-mirrored, Python (sympy)

Recorded status: Identity [E] (theta_i = regular g_car-gon interior angle; cos = -1/(2 phi); golden character unique to g_car=5) + [C] bridge re-reading (no status change)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: Identity [E]: theta_i = 3 pi/5 is the regular g_car-gon (pentagon) interior angle, cos theta_i = -1/(2 phi), and the golden character is unique to g_car=5 -- so the 'unmapped' golden/icosahedral E8 structure (v354/v313) is the geometry of the one external cosmological input theta_i (v211); [C] a re-reading that refines v354 and gives a geometric motive for the spine branch, but does NOT upgrade DM.AXION.SPINE.01 (stays [C]) or close any gate

Dependencies: DM.AXION.SPINE.01; E8.REVERSE.AUDIT.01; GOLD.ATOMS.01

Scripts: v429_axion_pentagon_phi.py

Location: tfpt_4_frontier

Original CSV, line 300

Original ledger status

FR.ETAB.04

FR.ETAB.04

LEPTOGENESIS SCALARON-DECUPLE BRANCH (2026-06-15): BOTH Boltzmann inputs share the decuple A_Lambda = 10 = |E(K5)| -- M_1 = M_scal phi0^2/A_Lambda ~ 8.65e9 GeV and m~1 = m_3/A_Lambda ~ 5 meV. A cleaner [C] route than FR.ETAB.03/v184's M_1 = M_R phi0^4, which only RELOCATED the free input to the un-pinned seesaw scale M_R. (1) [I] SHARED DECUPLE: A_Lambda = 10 = |E(K5)| (action-grammar atom) divides BOTH inputs -- M_1 = M_scal phi0^2/A_Lambda, m~1 = m_3/A_Lambda; leptogenesis = scalaron reheating dressed by two seed insertions (phi0^2), over the pair sector (A_Lambda). (2) [N] HEAVY MASS in the window: M_1 = M_scal phi0^2/A_Lambda = 8.65e9 GeV (M_scal = c3^{7/2} Mbar ~ 3.06e13 GeV, phi0 ~ 0.053172), inside the natural thermal window [3e9, 3e10] GeV (v169) and above the Davidson-Ibarra floor ~1e9 GeV. (3) [N] WASHOUT anchor: m~1 = m_3/A_Lambda ~ 5 meV (m_3 ~ sqrt(dm2_atm) ~ 0.05 eV), K = m~1/m_* ~ 4.6 (strong washout, m_* ~ 1.08 meV) -- the SAME A_Lambda = 10 as M_1. (4) [N] eta_B LANDS: Davidson-Ibarra eps_1 = (3/16 pi) M_1 m_3/v^2 ~ 8.5e-7; with kappa_f ~ 0.15 (strong washout) and sphaleron 28/79, eta_B ~ 0.96e-2 eps_1 kappa_f ~ 1.2e-9 -- O(1e-9), bracketing the observed 6.1e-10 (v169 band), no tuning. (5) [C] HONEST: unlike v184's M_1 = M_R phi0^4 (relocates the free input to the un-pinned M_R), here M_1 uses ONLY {M_scal, phi0, A_Lambda} -- no hidden seesaw scale, both inputs share A_Lambda; but the coupling MECHANISM (why M_1 = M_scal phi0^2/A_Lambda) is posited, not derived, and kappa_f is washout-dependent -- so eta_B stays [C], a sharper scenario, not a derivation. (6) [X] KILL TEST: a precise flavored-Boltzmann/RGE solve at M_1 = M_scal phi0^2/A_Lambda, m~1 = m_3/A_Lambda -- an eta_B outside the observed band falls the ROUTE, not the theory (Route A / Omega_b is independent, FR.ETAB.01). Python-only

Recorded status: Physical [C] (sharper scenario; both Boltzmann inputs share A_Lambda=10, no hidden seesaw scale) + [X] kill test

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: Physical [C]: M_1 = M_scal phi0^2/A_Lambda ~ 8.65e9 GeV and m~1 = m_3/A_Lambda ~ 5 meV both use the decuple A_Lambda=10 (no hidden seesaw scale) -- cleaner than v184's M_R phi0^4; eta_B brackets 6.1e-10 but stays [C] (coupling mechanism posited, not derived)

Dependencies: FR.ETAB.01; FR.ETAB.02; FR.ETAB.03; v169_etaB_boltzmann_interface.py

Scripts: v212_leptogenesis_decuple.py

Location: tfpt_4_frontier

Original CSV, line 301

Original ledger status

CONTRACT.F.01

CONTRACT.F.01

THE F_transfer FUNCTOR CONTRACT (2026-06-15): the four frontier transfers are ONE typed functor F_transfer = F_observable o F_threshold o F_RG satisfying four structural axioms, each instance a DISCRETE compiler kernel [E/I] composed with an EXTERNAL continuous solver [C/O]. This is the third research contract (alongside U_wall and G_metric), the structural complement of the v187 typing GUARD: v187 enforces the [C]/[O] markers, CONTRACT.F.01 verifies the functor structure. The four instances are F_pole (Koide, v183), F_Boltzmann (eta_B, v212), F_relic (axion, v211), F_QCD (m_p/m_e, v164/FR.MPME). (1) [I] AXIOM 1 mu4-DECK EQUIVARIANCE: the discrete kernels are carrier/deck invariants {|mu4|=4, N_fam=3, g_car=5, A_Lambda=10}; the Koide relaxation multiplier lambda_2 = (2/3)^6 = 64/729 IS the mu4-deck transfer eigenvalue (the deck map fixes the branch divisor, v82/v54), so F_pole commutes with the deck. (2) [I] AXIOM 2 PLUCKER PRESERVATION: where the observable is dimensionless the discrete readout is an Anchor-Plane Plucker reading -- Koide 53 = a^T(R+Q)1 is the F-corner reading (Pl(F)=(1,22,30)), the quark ratio uses ||Pl(K)||_1 = 11; the functor carries these integer Plucker invariants unchanged. (3) [I] AXIOM 3 POSITIVITY/STOCHASTICITY: where Boltzmann/relic densities enter the kernel is positive -- spec(T) = {1,(2/3)^6,(1/3)^6} is positive (RP/OS, v54), the washout kappa_f in (0,1), Omega_a > 0. (4) [I] AXIOM 4 EXTERNAL MODULES EXPLICIT: the continuous content of each instance is a named external module (pole transfer; flavored Davidson-Nardi-Nir Boltzmann; finite-T misalignment ODE with chi(T); non-perturbative lattice C_N), never a compiler number; b_3 = -7 is a carrier output (|b_3| = 11 - (2/3)(2 N_fam) = Omega_adm - 10 b_1 = 48 - 41 = 7). (5) [C] VERDICT: F_transfer is a typed FUNCTOR with four axioms, NOT a bag of open topics; the discrete kernels are [E]/[I] (exact compiler invariants), the external solvers [C]/[O] (standard physics). An architectural consolidation, NOT a closure -- each measured observable still needs its external solver. [2026-08-05 LXII, THE JET ROUTE CLOSES + THE FIBERED REFINEMENT (v777): the executed external-clock contract FTRANSFER.CLOCKS.01 fires its preregistered K1 kill sympy-exactly (transported Schwarzians {-Delta^2/2, -Delta^2/2, 0}; Delta = 6 log(3/2)) -- NO common continuous clock exists for the four jets; the surviving architecture is measured to be a FIBERED functor: one shared DISCRETE PGL2 base (anchor cross-ratio 4/3 exact -- symbolic AND through the frozen g_*s table at dev 6.5e-4; deck unit |Delta sigma| = 1; the deck generator is the unit parabolic translation tr^2 - 4 det = 0, the v632 lattice-explicit discrete half) + channel-specific projective connections whose obstruction is the CONSTANT seam cocycle with values EXACTLY {0, +-Delta^2/2} (antisymmetry + cocycle identity exact on all 27 triples, d/dsigma identically zero); classification matches the predeclared marker: thermal/proper-time clocks {tau, beta} -> coset -Delta^2/2, RG clock {log mu} -> coset 0, relic degenerate NOT classified; torsor difference = Delta^2/2 exactly. The contract's four functor axioms stand; the jet/continuous-clock unification demand is REPLACED by the fibered form, with the Schwarzian differences stored as the obstruction cocycle -- not fitted away. The one named proof-grade next step: derive the coset assignment from KMS/modular clock typing. The four observables stay [C]/[O]; no marker move.] Python-only UPDATE (2026-07-31, v566): a preregistered fit-free cross-ratio check is added to the contract surface -- if the four external solvers export canonical projective states (declared BEFORE evaluation), Moebius transport along the v533 disc -7 norm line forces CR(y_J, y_K; y_C, y_F) = 4/3 exactly (the universal arithmetic-progression cross-ratio; negative control: the raw determinant path gives 28/25 -- the known norm sequence cannot pass); the fourth state is forced from the first three (y_F reconstruction identity). Test design only; no solver states are exported yet; contract status unchanged. [2026-07-31: the preregistered cross-ratio check is EXECUTED on its discrete half by v571 (CR-PASSES; y_F = 53 Moebius-forced by the upstream corners); the continuous-solver half stays open; see FTR.CRDISC.01.] [2026-07-31: the continuous half of the cross-ratio check executed by v575 (UNIFLOW-DEGENERATE -- native exports cannot form four independent projective states, by the v425 single-flow theorem); both halves of the check are now executed; see FTR.CRCONT.01.] NOTE (2026-08-06, v792 -- marker UNCHANGED): the fibered refinement's clock-fiber classification is completed at theorem level -- the Schwarzian coset carried by a clock chart is a FUNCTION of its KMS/modular typing datum alone (KMS-COSET-THEOREM: modular/thermal clocks carry -Delta^2/2, autonomous RG charts carry 0), with the non-circularity of the classifier gated on its own source; see FTRANSFER.KMSCOSET.01.

Recorded status: Contract [C]/[O] (typed functor: discrete kernels [E], external solvers [C]; not a closure)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: Contract [C]/[O]: F_transfer = F_observable o F_threshold o F_RG, four axioms (mu4-deck equivariant, Plucker-preserving, positive/stochastic, external-module-explicit), four instances v183/v212/v211/v164; discrete kernels [E], external solvers [C]; the third research contract alongside U_wall/G_metric, guarded by v187, NOT a closure; 2026-08-05 (v777): the jet route is closed by the executed K1 kill of FTRANSFER.CLOCKS.01 -- the surviving form is the FIBERED functor (discrete PGL2 base, constant seam obstruction cocycle {0, +-Delta^2/2}, thermal-vs-RG coset split, relic degenerate); next named step: coset assignment from KMS/modular clock typing

Dependencies: FR.KOIDE.04; FR.ETAB.04; DM.AXION.SPINE.01; FR.MPME.01; v187_ftransfer_laws.py

Scripts: v213_ftransfer_functor.py

Location: tfpt_research_contracts

Original CSV, line 302

Original ledger status

DIAMOND.AXIS.01

DIAMOND.AXIS.01

DIAMOND AXIS CURVATURE LEMMA (2026-06-15): along the two canonical axes of the centered cross (C center, U winding, V sheet, v95) the Sheet-Diamond determinant is LINEAR on the winding axis and QUADRATIC on the sheet axis: det(C+xU)=14+6x (flat, slope 6=|R^+(A_3)|), det(C+yV)=14+14y+4y^2 (2nd difference 8=rank E_8); the anchor block satisfies det B(C+xU)=28+12x=2 det(C+xU) and det B(C+yV)=28+21y+3y^2 (2nd difference 6=|R^+(A_3)|). So winding flows linearly (A_3-driven) and the sheet split curves, with curvatures (8 det, 6 anchor)=(rank E_8, |R^+(A_3)|) -- a discrete differential geometry of the diamond. Exact identity UPDATE (2026-07-31, v566, DIAMOND.PARA.SELFCODE.01): the direction operators U, V generate the full 2|1 parabolic algebra (dim 7); the anchor a = (1,1,2) is the spectrum of I + V(V-I)/2 with chi_H coefficients (4,5,2) = (flag, Levi, radical) -- the double self-code; the staircase-sum 81 is simultaneously the saturated lattice index [P_Z : Z<U,V>] = 3^4 (cokernel (Z/3)^4). Markers unchanged.

Recorded status: Identity (exact)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: [E] det(C+xU)=14+6x linear, det(C+yV)=14+14y+4y^2 quadratic; curvatures (8,6)=(rank E_8, |R^+(A_3)|)

Dependencies: v94_sheet_diamond.py; v95_centered_diamond.py

Scripts: v218_diamond_axis_geometry.py

Location: tfpt_2_standard_model

Original CSV, line 303

Original ledger status

DIAMOND.PLUCKER.01

DIAMOND.PLUCKER.01

PLUCKER TRANSFER LADDER (2026-06-15): the anchor-Plucker coordinates lift K->C->F in two exact steps: Pl(K)=(-1,6,4), Pl(C)=(0,14,14), Pl(F)=(1,22,30); Pl(C)-Pl(K)=(1,8,10)=(N_Phi, rank E_8, A_Lambda) and Pl(F)-Pl(C)=(1,8,16)=(N_Phi, rank E_8, dim S^+). Each step adds (1,8) in the first two coordinates; the third adds first the decuple A_Lambda=10 then the full spinor generation dim S^+=16. The Plucker identity is [E]; the F_transfer source->pole reading (a two-stage sheet lift in the Anchor Plane) stays [C]

Recorded status: Identity (exact)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: [E] Pl ladder K->C->F: steps (1,8,10) and (1,8,16) = decuple then full generation; transfer reading [C]

Dependencies: v94_sheet_diamond.py; v213_ftransfer_functor.py

Scripts: v218_diamond_axis_geometry.py

Location: tfpt_2_standard_model

Original CSV, line 304

Original ledger status

DIAMOND.SPECTRAL.01

DIAMOND.SPECTRAL.01

SPECTRAL RAMIFICATION LADDER (2026-06-15): for Q,K,C,F the characteristic polynomial splits as (t-r)(t^2-bt+c) with r rational, and the full cubic discriminant factors as Disc(chi)=q(r)^2 Disc(q): squares |q(r)| in {1,3,4,6}=(N_Phi,N_fam,|mu4|,|R^+(A_3)|), kernels Disc(q) in {13,48,65,105}=(Delta_Q, Omega_adm, g_car Delta_Q, N_fam g_car 7), with Delta_Q=13=b^2+s^2=|R(A_3)|+1 the carrier-split norm (v14). The missing corner F carries the kernel 105=3*5*7=family*carrier*scalaron. Exact identity. (Audit blocks in the same module: the anchor-defect spectrum Delta_a(Q,K,R,C,L,F)=(8,16,18,21,24,26) and the pair-sum atlas/determinant staircase are AUDIT fingerprints -- the 28=2 dim G_2, 52=dim F_4 labels stay audit-only, not spine; F as transfer-completion corner is a HEURISTIC, not a hard filter)

Recorded status: Identity (exact)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: [E] Disc(chi)=q(r)^2 Disc(q) for Q,K,C,F: squares (1,3,4,6), kernels (13,48,65,105); audit/heuristic blocks honestly typed

Dependencies: v14_carrier_uniqueness.py; v94_sheet_diamond.py

Scripts: v218_diamond_axis_geometry.py

Location: tfpt_2_standard_model

Original CSV, line 305

Original ledger status

MCKAY.E8.01

MCKAY.E8.01

McKAY BEDROCK (2026-06-16): WHY the three atoms are {2,3,5}. E8 is the exceptional TOP of the McKay tower of finite SU(2) subgroups (2T->affine E6 h=12, 2O->affine E7 h=18, 2I binary icosahedral order 120 -> affine E8 h=30=2*3*5). Built FROM the group, not asserted: (1) the 120 unit-quaternion icosians close to 2I with element orders {1,2,3,4,5,6,10} (it CONTAINS the 2,3,5 rotation-axis orders), 9 conjugacy classes; (2) the 9 irreducible character DEGREES from the class algebra (Dixon) are {1,2,2,3,3,4,4,5,6}, sum=30=h(E8), sum of squares=120=|R^+(E8)|; (3) the McKay adjacency A_ij=<chi_V chi_j,chi_i> from the natural 2-dim rep IS the affine E8 graph (tree, top eigenvalue 2), with Kac marks = the irrep degrees; (4) negative controls 2T->E6, 2O->E7 -- only the icosahedral (2,3,5) gives E8. A BACKWARD CERTIFICATE of the already-closed E8, NOT an independent P2 proof.

Recorded status: Lattice (McKay correspondence, exact)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: [E] 2I (order 120) irrep degrees {1,2,2,3,3,4,4,5,6} = affine E8 Kac marks, sum 30=h(E8), sum^2 120=|R^+(E8)|; the McKay graph built from the group; E8 = the (2,3,5) icosahedral top. Backward certificate [E], 'explains (2,3,5)' [C], raw-seam origin [O]

Dependencies: AX.P2.01; E8.GLU.01; ARCH.CORE.01

Scripts: v219_icosahedral_mckay.py

Location: origin_theory

Original CSV, line 306

Open questions preserve their achieved subresults

Each research problem has its own scope. A resolved task does not close its whole physical parent. Historical tasks remain explicitly historical in the source record.

Future quotient and positive GNS reconstruction

What is determined by complete future behavior, and what additional positive word-kernel source is needed to reconstruct a cyclic operator realization?

  • Resolved in scope: Future quotient from complete rRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Conditional GNS reconstruction from supplied KRead result
  • open: Select complete K from the original source
Historical: common source, state and event selection

Outside the active mathematical research program since the user's23Oct2026 decision. Historical question: Do the original principles derive a common physical source together with its state, dynamical events, and physically observed fields?

Seam connection and family action

Does the joint discrete theorem determine a concrete connection and a family coupling compatible with the determinant seam action?

  • Resolved in scope: Separate classes from actual transportRead result
  • open: Derive the common connection from the original source
Physical time and complete transfer

Do the original reflection/projector structures determine the full physical time generator and required field transfer?

  • Resolved in scope: Reuse the sign-projector counterexampleRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Reuse conditional full-transfer reconstructionRead result
  • open: Identify the physical complete TFPT transfer
  • Resolved in scope: Reuse complete collar reconstructionRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Classify homogeneous GKLS embedding of the shared register familyRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Decide every homogeneous GKSL logarithm of the fixed M4 channelRead result
Flavor ratio and absolute amplitude scale

Which flavor quantity is fixed on the derived discrete stratum, and which requires the continuous holonomy anchor?

  • Resolved in scope: Reuse the derived flavor ratioRead result
  • open: Determine the absolute holonomy amplitude
Alpha: derived terms, unique root and physical EM identification

Where do the factors and closed alpha equation come from, which provenance steps are proved, and which precise physical EM identification remains open?

  • Resolved in scope: Separate root calculation from source selectionRead result
  • open: Derive the actual EM functional variation and Thomson identification
  • Resolved in scope: Establish the unique global positive rootRead result
Geometric flow and gravity normalization

Do common matter-only observations derive geometric horizon flow and the area response from the original gravity source?

  • Resolved in scope: Record scope of fixed original functionalRead result
  • open: Derive geometric modular response and area coefficient
Clocks and complete neutral source response

Which complete quadratic response can the actual clock images reconstruct?

  • Resolved in scope: Reconstruct all neutral quadratic matrix directionsRead result
  • open: Derive physically admissible probe access
Clock action on charge, time and quarter transition

How does the actual Gaussian J act on the complete marked source?

  • Resolved in scope: Construct original J lift with complete time/charge actionRead result
  • open: Derive physical meaning of the frame orbit
Which responses distinguish charged time action?

Which data separate sources with identical complete neutral vacuum response?

  • Resolved in scope: Determine twist blindness completelyRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Reconstruct twist from charged responsesRead result
  • open: Derive actual charged source probes
Which seam action distinguishes native opposite charges?

Can existing native charge fields produce the quarter-twist time response of the seam?

  • Resolved in scope: Check native fields and response discriminatorRead result
  • open: Derive actual marked seam/state action
Constructive seam search: operators, state and source compatibility

What does the complete phase search decide, and which additional state information prevents a false source solution?

  • Resolved in scope: Finite search closed, actual winding and parity equivalenceRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Positive finite-word state extensionRead result
  • Resolved in scope: E8 current group conditionally determines the P signRead result
  • Resolved in scope: The same shift functional hides distinct ground statesRead result
  • Resolved in scope: No phase hit realizes the unchanged sourceRead result
Which partner actually belongs to the original seam?

Which charge, state type and time action belong to the root partner and original sheet pairing?

  • Resolved in scope: Concrete pair operator; source neutrality is not hypercharge neutralityRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Fixed quarter time splits the color/weak multipletRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Explicit conjugation for the existing sheet pairingRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Actual partner map between quarter domainsRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Bilinear sheet pairing is not Hermitian kernel selectionRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Actual quarter conjugation transports the supplied markingRead result
  • Resolved in scope: No time-stabilizing orthogonal repair of the fixed markingRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Spinor16 is a state sector, not a 16-real one-particle fieldRead result
Automated construction of operator maps and sources

Which tools generate operator maps, learn counterexamples, and can search for the full positive source?

  • Resolved in scope: Calibrate new search without supplying the target mapRead result
  • open: Synthesize a joint field, marking and transfer dictionary
  • open: Search for the positive common source kernel itself
  • Resolved in scope: Automatically construct, certify and distinguish finite kernelsRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Repair search conditions against source types and collar controlsRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Reconstruct multi-field sewing of the canonically identified boundary sourceRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Retain absolute reference amplitude in searchRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Integrate supplied free source including boundary response and scalarRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Convert the full finite CAR kernel into a link functionalRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Close original recursive word reconstruction with memoryRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Retain whole original caller through scale and readoutRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute actual shared Higgs source with full matter words and local RPRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Reduce whole constant original Higgs spectral fiberRead result
  • open: Resolve original geometric Higgs residue sign and field map
  • Resolved in scope: Evaluate local original Higgs heat identification and whole finite consumerRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute whole variable bound Higgs reference and original scale mapRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute whole inner Higgs scale/source and normal kernel transportRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute given whole superconnection and normal spectral readerRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Determine own-admissibility and whole total-chiral spectral readersRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Derive whole scale-energy map,normal profile and relative flowRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute original Green energy producer and mixed scale readoutRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Match current action argument and common Higgs/gravity weightsRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute whole original curvature consumers and Higgs radial sourceRead resultRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute original whole four-ghost source and geometric type testRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute original moving normal kernel derivative and whole source responseRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Decide fixed original O1 source and normal operator placementRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Compare whole Higgs mixture and covariance reader on invariant four-field witnessRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Test exact bounded cutoff on whole ordinary Higgs volumeRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Test whole original circle joint mode and IR Higgs normalizationRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Test original O1 mode covariance against whole Higgs-law classRead result
  • open: Reconstruct original localization from the whole process
  • Resolved in scope: Test bare native-code word compression against actual localityRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Decide original geometric local-time class and execute actual interval readerRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute actual regional two-face partner and supported charged wordRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute original color marginal, modular field law and complete class readerRead resultRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Reconstruct common Higgs law from whole original quarter source towerRead resultRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute original record action on Doily and ordered whole source responseRead resultRead resultRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Locally implement original record process and test unchanged exterior sourceRead resultRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute original elliptic insertion,whole source and causal responseRead resultRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Evaluate actual joint Higgs and color group sourceRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute whole original graph color reader with typed original center selectorRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute original color fixed source and first inherited grading testRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute actual original color-spinor CAR four-word and complete spin-sector sewingRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Decide actual color admissibility of density operations and coordinate regionsRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute actual whole seam-operation class and two-face responseRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute entire original C6 word expansion with source amplitudeRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute original collective Higgs force source and entire mean dualRead resultRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute original all-mode force with actual time and whole sourceRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute original local space/time force source and causal liftRead resultRead result
Origin reverse selection, field dictionary and original P1 kernel

What does reverse selection of P1/P2 give for concrete local fields and multi-field responses, and which identification with the original P1 kernel has actually been proved?

Observable reality: minimal conditions and counterworlds

Which operational conditions are independently required, which inequivalent models satisfy them, and which observable distinctions remain for selection?

Formal carrier core: unbounded Pascal uniqueness and finite glue

Which carrier and glue statements are already present in the papers and Lean sources, and which physical selection does not follow?

  • Resolved in scope: Classify the unbounded Pascal proofRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Classify the formal finite glue scopeRead result
Active mathematical program: marked seam monodromies and lattice lifts

Which marked seam/lattice transport geometries, lift classes and local-coefficient invariants arise from existing clock/reflection/quartic data? First complete case: sign lifts of fourJ representation on CP1 minusμ4.

  • Resolved in scope: Define marked seam category and factor formulaRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Completely classify quarter-clock four-puncture liftsRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Determine central class and all subgroup restrictionsRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Determine full G0 cocycle and classRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Determine native4/5/6local cohomologyRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Classify unrestricted G31 reflection monodromiesRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Determine lift class beyond G0Read result
  • open: Classify additional reflection/clock equivariance and mapping-class quotients
  • Resolved in scope: Equivariant lifting and divisibility by eightRead result
  • Resolved in scope: All62clock obstructions and central transport variantsRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Actual group comparison and central pushout exclusionRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Complete invariants and explicit collisionsRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Compare E6 and E7 slices with the actual quarter clockRead resultRead resultRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Classify original character-valued G31monodromy liftsRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Determine E7-pair action on all original lattice fieldsRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Completely connect E6/E7 cuts to the original compilerRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Compare common covers and actual clock carriersRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Prove shared representation consequence for48,4/3 and5/4Read result
  • Resolved in scope: Completely decide joint compiler-field-cover constructionRead resultRead resultRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Reconstruct canonical local compiler field source from C4Read resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Eliminate redundant sector and multiplicity assumptionsRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Classify native equivariant markingsRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Classify pure quarter clock mapping class quotientRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Determine complete cut algebra and lossless tetrahedron transformRead resultRead resultRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Completely compare scalar glue and actual native compiler classRead resultRead resultRead resultRead result
Common clock sectors, quartic geometry and operational reconstruction

Which previously separate data of the original TFPT core follow from a common clock and representation geometry, and which complete finite measurement classification follows without asserting physical source selection?

Automatic response search with original-source decision

Which additional joint response actually follows from original source equations, and which entire finite process family remains undecided without it?