Skip to main content
Back to the knowledge atlas

Original claim records.

The original technical record remains available here. For explanations, reviewed conclusions and the history of research questions, start with the knowledge atlas.

Research snapshot 2026-11-02 · 783 active ledger claims · 710 scientific findings · 707 registered scripts. These are different inventories, not counts of independent physical confirmations.

What does this inventory cover?

Every one of the 783 active ledger IDs is included. All 788 ledger rows, including superseded rows, remain in the download. The reviewed research corpus contains 711 findings; 1 administrative record is excluded from public scientific content, with the omission recorded in the coverage file.

The scientific findings include 519 established scoped results, 63 conditional results and 128 scoped exclusions. These labels describe the recorded finding. They do not upgrade its parent physical goal or overwrite the original ledger.

Sources were matched to their recorded hashes and line ranges at this snapshot. Bounded text excerpts make sources available even when a source is not in the earlier public release. Any omitted administrative lines are explicitly marked. This is source coverage, not a new execution of Python, Lean or Wolfram proofs.

Atlas revision 2c1b559b738e5740ecfad8e6 · snapshot SHA256 68c2fe33ce86d45a99a8c21b1e731e40749d0accb3ae69be53d198cd7ebcb48e

1493 matching records · page 21 of 75

Original ledger status

QGEO.MODHAM.01

QGEO.MODHAM.01

BEDROCK omega o rho = omega VIA AN EXPLICIT MODULAR HAMILTONIAN (2026-06-21, TOE attack point 2): the next concrete step on the open bedrock QGEO.SYM.01. [E] NON-CIRCULAR upstream: marks=2 chi(S^2)=4 (Gauss-Bonnet, v216) and the order-4 clock z->iz from cross-ratio 2 / j=1728 (v214/v267), so mu4 is DERIVED, not assumed (rho^4=I). [E] for the thermal quasi-free covariance C=1/(1+e^{H1}) the one-particle modular Hamiltonian K=log((1-C)/C) recovered from C round-trips to the seam operator H1 (machine precision). [E] rho C rho^dag=C AND [rho,K]=0 <=> omega o rho = omega, because mu4 curvature couples only modes n-n' in 4Z (i^{n-n'}=1). [E] NEG: a non-mu4 (period-2/Z2) curvature breaks the invariance. [O] residual: the RAW RP-collar C is intrinsically this clock-invariant thermal quasi-free state (Bisognano-Wichmann intrinsicality). Sharpens v198/v210; does NOT close QGEO.SYM.01.

Recorded status: Reduction [E]/[O] (modular bedrock)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: [E] the non-circular marks+clock assembly + the explicit modular-Hamiltonian round-trip + [rho,K]=0 state invariance + the Z2 negative control; [O] the Bisognano-Wichmann intrinsicality of the raw collar. The sharpest single open theorem made explicit; NOT a closure.

Dependencies: QGEO.SYM.01; v198; v210; v214; v216

Scripts: v309_modular_bedrock.py

Location: tfpt_research_contracts

Original CSV, line 407

Original ledger status

CAR.SM.ANOM.01

CAR.SM.ANOM.01

THE CARRIER HALF-SPINOR IS ONE ANOMALY-FREE SM GENERATION + THE SM RG (2026-06-21, TOE attack point 3): connects the discrete compiler to constructive 4D QFT, closing the spectrum+anomaly+beta sub-question exactly. [E] 16=Lambda^even(C^5)=1+10+5; SU(5) c SO(10): 10+5bar+1 = one SM generation (Q,u^c,d^c,L,e^c,nu^c), 16 Weyl states. [E] ANOMALY-FREE: sum Y=0, sum Y^3=0, [SU2]^2U1=0, [SU3]^2U1=0 (exact Fraction arithmetic). [E] one-loop RG from the carrier content (3 gen + 1 Higgs): (b1,b2,b3)=(41/10,-19/6,-7); b1 numerator 41 = the EM-budget integer (v3/v159), b3=-(11-2 n_f/3) with n_f=2 N_fam. [E] NEG: dropping nu^c leaves an incomplete 15!=16 multiplet; a 4th family shifts b1 off 41/10 (N_fam=3 pins the RG). [C]/[O] the full Epstein-Glaser interacting S-matrix (v269/v271/v273) and the Yukawa sector stay open. Closes the spectrum/anomaly/beta layer; not the interacting S-matrix.

Recorded status: Identity [E] (spectrum+anomaly+RG) + [C]/[O] (S-matrix)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: [E] the 16=1+10+5 decomposition + the four exact anomaly cancellations + the one-loop (b1,b2,b3)=(41/10,-19/6,-7) + the N_fam=3 RG-pinning negative controls; [C]/[O] the full EG interacting S-matrix + Yukawa. A genuine closure of the carrier->anomaly-free-SM+RG sub-question; does NOT close the interacting theory.

Dependencies: CAR.SM.01; QFT4D.SPERT.03; v273; v159

Scripts: v310_carrier_sm_anomaly.py

Location: tfpt_research_contracts

Original CSV, line 408

Original ledger status

QGAMB.CLUSTER.01

QGAMB.CLUSTER.01

THE PHYSICAL QG MEASURE AS A GAP-DECOUPLED, CLUSTERING OBJECT (2026-06-21, TOE attack point 4): the honest statement in place of an over-claimed 4D measure for QG.AMB.01/G_metric. [E] the seam transfer spectrum {1,(2/3)^6,(1/3)^6} gives geometric clustering of the connected correlator at rate (2/3)^6, correlation length xi=1/Delta=1/(6 ln(3/2)). [E] finite susceptibility sum (2/3)^{6n}=1/(1-(2/3)^6)=729/665<inf => a well-defined admissible-sector thermodynamic limit (unique vacuum). [E] gap-decoupling (v76): Delta-31/(4pi^2)~1.648>0, the gap survives metric dressing so the physical sector is DECOUPLED from the un-built ambient. [E] NEG: an ungapped transfer (2nd eig->1) sends xi,chi->inf (no clustering). [C] spectral-action dictionary a2=EH, a4=R^2/72 (v36) + KMS beta=1 (v259). [O] the FULL ambient measure QG.AMB.01 is not built -- gap-decoupled and inert, so the physical sector does not need it.

Recorded status: Reduction [E]/[C]/[O] (gap-decoupled measure)

Later scope correction: the DtN form estimate alone does not prove the transfer gap.

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: [E] the geometric clustering at rate (2/3)^6 + finite correlation length/susceptibility + the v76 decoupling margin + the ungapped negative control; [C] the spectral-action low-energy dictionary; [O] the full ambient measure (gap-decoupled, inert). Shows the physical sector is a convergent object; does NOT construct QG.AMB.01.

Dependencies: QG.AMB.01; GATE.METRIC.01; QG.GAPDEC.01; v36; v76; v259

Scripts: v311_gap_decoupled_measure.py

Location: tfpt_research_contracts

Original CSV, line 409

Original ledger status

HYP.INJECT.01

HYP.INJECT.01

THE HYPERGRAPH SUBSTRATE SHARPENED -- WHAT A REWRITE MUST INJECT (2026-06-21, TOE attack point 5): turns the open rewrite-to-full-structure question into a precise list. [E] the affine-E8 Kac marks (1,2,3,4,5,6,4,2,3) are the Perron eigenvector (A.marks=2 marks, top eigenvalue 2) -- the Coxeter skeleton is graph-spectral (v298/v299). [E] the subleading eigenvalue is exactly 2cos(pi/5)=golden ratio phi (the icosahedral (2,3,5)/5-fold signature; spectrum {+-2,+-phi,+-1,+-1/phi,0}). [E] HONEST NEGATIVE: the recovery rate (2/3)^6 is NOT any eigenvalue of A (the lazy-update rate (phi+2)/4=0.9045 != 2/3), so the family-recovery dynamics (gap 6 ln(3/2)) is carried by the cusp weights {0,1/3,2/3}, NOT the adjacency. [E] HONEST NEGATIVE: phi0=1/(6pi)+48c3^4 is analytic, not a rational edge fraction (v298). [O] CONCLUSION: a full-structure rewrite must inject exactly two non-graph-spectral data -- the cusp weight 2/3=|Z2|/N_fam and the analytic seed phi0; the open question is precisely delimited, not closed (NOT a derivation of P1/P2).

Recorded status: Reduction [E]/[O] (substrate sharpening)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: [E] the marks-as-Perron + the golden-ratio subleading eigenvalue + the two honest negatives (recovery rate not graph-spectral; seed not an edge fraction); [O] the rewrite-to-full-structure question (now delimited to two injectables). Sharpens v298/v299; does NOT derive P1/P2 from a rewrite.

Dependencies: E8.NETWORK.01; HYP.0D.01; v219; v298; v299

Scripts: v312_hypergraph_substrate.py

Location: introduction

Original CSV, line 410

Original ledger status

GOLD.ATOMS.01

GOLD.ATOMS.01

THE GOLDEN RATIO IS THE g_car=5 SIGNATURE -- THE (2,3,5) ATOMS ARE THE NETWORK SPECTRAL ANGLES (2026-06-21, v312 follow-up made exact). [E] EXACT: the affine-E8 adjacency charpoly factors x(x^2-4)(x^2-1)(x^2-x-1)(x^2+x-1); the golden minimal polynomial x^2-x-1 divides it, so phi=2cos(pi/5)=(1+sqrt5)/2 is an EXACT algebraic eigenvalue (not a numerical near-value). [E] ATOMS = SPECTRAL ANGLES: the non-trivial eigenvalues are 2cos(pi/k) for exactly k in {2,3,5}={|Z2|,N_fam,g_car}: 2cos(pi/2)=0, 2cos(pi/3)=1, 2cos(pi/5)=phi, plus the second 5-fold harmonic 2cos(2pi/5)=1/phi -- the golden ratio is SPECIFICALLY the g_car=5 (5-fold) signature. [E] NEW WITNESS for g_car=5: the 5-fold spectral angle pi/5, structurally distinct from Pascal (v2)/RR (v228)/reverse glue (raises the v305 multiplicity). [E] ICOSAHEDRAL SELECTION: 1/|Z2|+1/N_fam+1/g_car=31/30>1 (spherical => finite 2I => E8); numerator 31=2^g_car-1=248/8=1+h(E8) (the v63/v76 gap-margin numerator), denominator 30=h(E8)=|Z2|*N_fam*g_car. HONEST anti-numerology (v305): the four readings of 31 are ONE anchor-derived quantity, a unification/compression NOT new independent evidence. [E] HONEST NULL: phi is NOT a TFPT phenomenological readout (structural lattice/network quantity, kept out of the data grammar). [C] DIRECTION: phi=2cos(pi/5) is the E8-quasicrystal (Elser-Sloane cut-and-project) ratio -> a candidate aperiodic substrate for the v312 question.

Recorded status: Identity/Lattice [E] (spectral) + [C] (quasicrystal direction)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: [E] the exact golden-min-poly factorisation + the (2,3,5)=2cos(pi/k) spectral-angle identification + the new g_car spectral witness + the 31/30 icosahedral-selection identity (with the honest anti-numerology framing) + the phi-not-a-readout null; [C] the E8-quasicrystal substrate direction. A new structural reading; does NOT add a physical readout and does NOT close the substrate question.

Dependencies: MCKAY.E8.01; HYP.INJECT.01; v219; v312; v63

Scripts: v313_golden_atoms_spectral.py

Location: origin_theory

Original CSV, line 411

Original ledger status

COX.COUPLE.01

COX.COUPLE.01

COUPLE OR FACTORIZE? THE ORDER-30 COXETER SECTORS COUPLE AS A CYCLOTOMIC FIELD (2026-06-21, v314 follow-up). The v314 question -- does 30=g_car*(2 N_fam)=5*6 couple the carrier (5-fold, golden, Q(sqrt5)) and family (6=2*3, rational) sectors, or just factorize? [E] GROUP FACTORIZES: gcd(5,6)=1 => Z/30 = Z/5 x Z/6 (CRT, direct product); order-5 subgroup <c^6>, order-6 <c^5> -- group-level decoupled (consistent with the v314 field obstruction). [E] EXPONENTS FACTOR: the E8 exponents = totatives(30) split as totatives(5) x totatives(6); phi(30)=phi(5)phi(6)=4*2=8=rank E8; (m mod5, m mod6) is a bijection onto {1,2,3,4}x{1,5}. [E] FIELD COUPLES: [Q(zeta30):Q]=phi(30)=8=rank E8; Q(zeta30) is the COMPOSITUM of the carrier field Q(zeta5) (contains the golden sqrt5) and the family field Q(zeta6)=Q(zeta3) (contains zeta3). [E] GALOIS = mu4 x Z2: (Z/30)^x=(Z/5)^x x (Z/3)^x=Z/4 x Z/2 (order 8, max element order 4, NOT cyclic Z/8); mu4=(Z/5)^x is the CARRIER Galois, Z2=(Z/3)^x the FAMILY Galois -- so the P2 seam clock mu4 IS the Galois group of the carrier's golden field (refines v223). [E] CARRIER GENERATOR: sqrt5=phi+1/phi=2 phi-1 (the sum of the two golden network eigenvalues) = the quadratic Gauss sum zeta5-zeta5^2-zeta5^3+zeta5^4 in Q(zeta5), g^2=5. [C] VERDICT: 30=5*6 does NOT dynamically entangle the sectors (direct product + the v314 field obstruction) -- it couples them as the cyclotomic compositum Q(zeta30), Galois mu4 x Z2, degree rank E8; the carrier (sqrt5) and family (zeta3) are conjugate sub-data of ONE cyclotomic field, bridged by GALOIS not by a dynamical map.

Recorded status: Identity/Lattice [E] (cyclotomic Galois) + [C] (verdict)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: [E] the CRT direct-product factorisation + the exponent/totative factorisation + the Q(zeta30) compositum + the Galois=mu4 x Z2 identification (seam clock = carrier-field Galois) + the Gauss-sum carrier generator; [C] the couple-vs-factorize verdict. Answers the v314 coupling question exactly (Galois compositum, not a dynamical map); does NOT add a physical readout.

Dependencies: RATE.TRANSLATE.01; COX.TOTATIVE.01; v314; v223; v55

Scripts: v315_coxeter_coupling.py

Location: origin_theory

Original CSV, line 412

Original ledger status

GALOIS.READOUT.01

GALOIS.READOUT.01

DOES THE GALOIS mu4 x Z2 (v315) ORGANIZE THE PHYSICAL READOUTS? YES -- THE CP PHASES (2026-06-21, v315 follow-up to phenomenology). [E] FAMILY FACTOR: the hexagonal CP unit rho=zeta_6=zeta_30^5 is the order-6=2 N_fam factor c^5 of v315 (5=30/6); the carrier is zeta_5=zeta_30^6 (order 5=g_car, c^6) -- the CP phase lives in the FAMILY factor, not the carrier. [C] CP PHASES (inherits v231/v233): delta_CKM,lead=pi/3=arg(zeta_6), delta_PMNS=4pi/3=arg(zeta_6^4) (the power 4=|mu4|, the seam clock). [E] SHEET FLIP: zeta_6^4=-zeta_6 (rho^3=-1), so delta_PMNS=delta_CKM+pi (the |Z2| sheet); mu6=mu3 x mu2 (family x sheet), zeta_6=-zeta_3^2. [E] GALOIS Z2 = CP CONJUGATION: Gal(Q(zeta_6)/Q)=(Z/6)^x={1,5}=Z2, sigma: zeta_6->zeta_6^5=conj(zeta_6) (delta->-delta) -- the FAMILY Galois factor of mu4 x Z2 IS the physical CP-conjugation symmetry. [E] CARRIER STATIC: zeta_5=zeta_30^6 (the golden sqrt5) carries NO phase readout -- mu4=(Z/5)^x organizes the lattice/spectrum, not a CP phase. [E] HONEST SEPARATION: the magnitudes (sin^2 theta12=1/3-phi0/2, phi0=1/(6pi)+48c3^4 transcendental) are NOT in any Q(zeta_n) -- Galois organizes PHASES (cyclotomic), the magnitudes are the analytic seed. [C] VERDICT: the v315 Galois coupling reaches SM phenomenology through the FAMILY (order-6) factor -- the CP phases are its cyclotomic data (rho=zeta_6=zeta_30^5, mu6=mu3 x mu2, Gal Z2=CP conjugation); the carrier (mu4/golden) factor is static; the magnitudes are the analytic seed (v314 field split).

Recorded status: Identity/Lattice [E] (cyclotomic CP) + [C] (physical identification)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: [E] the family-factor placement of the CP unit zeta_6=zeta_30^5 + the sheet flip + the Galois-Z2 = CP-conjugation identification + the carrier-static fact + the magnitude/seed separation; [C] the identification with the physical delta_CKM/delta_PMNS (inherits v231/v233). Bridges the v315 Galois coupling to SM phenomenology (the phase sector); does NOT upgrade the CP-phase typing.

Dependencies: COX.COUPLE.01; CP.TRIALITY.01; v315; v231; v233

Scripts: v316_galois_readout.py

Location: origin_theory

Original CSV, line 413

Original ledger status

GALOIS.FAMILY.01

GALOIS.FAMILY.01

ARE THE 3 GENERATIONS A mu3/GALOIS ORBIT? YES (mu3), REFINED 1+2 BY GALOIS (2026-06-21, v316 follow-up to the generation structure). [E] GENERATIONS = CUBE ROOTS: the 3 cusp weights {0,1/3,2/3} (Spec(Q+)=3a+1={1,2,3}=A3 exponents) map under w->e^{2 pi i w} to the 3rd roots of unity {1,zeta_3,zeta_3^2}. [E] mu3 ORBIT (transitive): the cyclic family symmetry w->w+1/3 mod 1 permutes them cyclically -- ONE transitive Z/3=mu3 orbit (the family IS the cube-root orbit). [E] RECOVERY: the transfer eigenvalues (1-w)^6={1,(2/3)^6,(1/3)^6} attach to the weights; the attractor (eigenvalue 1, the stationary law, v56) is the w=0 weight. [E] GALOIS REFINEMENT 1+2: Gal(Q(zeta3)/Q)=Z2, sigma: zeta_3->zeta_3^2 acts on weights by w->2w mod 1, FIXING w=0 (rational) and SWAPPING w=1/3<->w=2/3 -- so the Galois orbit is 1 (fixed) + 2 (pair), NOT transitive. [E] FIXED = ATTRACTOR: the Galois-fixed w=0 <-> transfer eigenvalue 1 (the law); the Galois-conjugate pair w=1/3,2/3 <-> the decaying modes (2/3)^6,(1/3)^6 (the hierarchy) -- selection = the rational generation. [E] SAME Z2 AS CP CONJUGATION (v316): sigma: zeta_3->zeta_3^2=conj(zeta_3). [E] COUNTS: N_fam=3=|mu3|=#weights=|Spec(Q+)| (A3 exponents {1,2,3}). [C] VERDICT: the 3 generations ARE a single mu3 (cyclic family) orbit {1,zeta_3,zeta_3^2}; the Galois group refines it to 1 (rational=the recovery attractor) + 2 (conjugate pair=the hierarchy), that Z2 = the v316 CP conjugation; the family STRUCTURE is arithmetic, the mass MAGNITUDES stay the analytic seed (NOT derived).

Recorded status: Identity/Lattice [E] (mu3+Galois orbit) + [C] (verdict)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: [E] the cusp-weights = cube-roots identification + the transitive mu3 orbit + the recovery-eigenvalue attachment + the Galois 1+2 refinement (fixed=attractor, pair=hierarchy) + the same-Z2-as-CP-conjugation + the counts; [C] the verdict. Shows the family STRUCTURE is the same arithmetic (mu3 orbit, Galois-refined) as the CP phase; does NOT derive the mass magnitudes (analytic seed).

Dependencies: GALOIS.READOUT.01; COX.COUPLE.01; v316; v315; v56

Scripts: v317_galois_family.py

Location: origin_theory

Original CSV, line 414

Original ledger status

ARITH.CAPSTONE.01

ARITH.CAPSTONE.01

THE CAPSTONE: THE SM STRUCTURAL SECTOR IS Q(zeta30) + GALOIS mu4 x Z2, COMPLETE INPUT {a, pi, v_geo} (2026-06-21, synthesis of the v313-v317 arc). [E] ARITHMETIC SKELETON: the SM STRUCTURAL sector (3 generations, 2 CP phases, the orbit/hierarchy ordering) lives in the cyclotomic field Q(zeta30): [Q(zeta30):Q]=phi(30)=8=rank E8, 30=|Z2|*N_fam*g_car=h(E8), Galois (Z/30)^x=mu4 x Z2 (order 8) -- carrier mu4=(Z/5)^x (golden sqrt5, v313/v315), family/sheet Z2=(Z/3)^x (zeta3=CP conjugation, v316); the 3 generations = the mu3 cube-root orbit (v317), the 2 CP phases = the zeta6 family-factor data (v316). [E] RIGIDITY: forced by the anchor atoms {|Z2|,N_fam,g_car}={2,3,5}=elementary-symmetric data of a=(1,1,2); 30=2*3*5 -- no freedom in the skeleton. [E] MAGNITUDE REDUCTION: the seed phi0=(|mu4|/N_fam)c3+Omega_adm c3^4=(4/3)c3+48 c3^4 (c3=1/(8pi)) is a PURE function of pi (no free parameters), coefficients anchor-derived (4/3=|mu4|/N_fam, 48=Omega_adm=N_fam*dim_Splus); so the magnitudes (sin^2 theta12=1/3-phi0/2) are {a,pi}-determined, transcendental (NOT cyclotomic) but NOT free. [E] FREE INVENTORY: dimensionless free parameters = 0 (everything is {a,pi}); pi the unique transcendental primitive (ARCH.CORE.01/v53); v_geo the unique dimensionful input (No-Unit Theorem v153/v78) -- complete input = {a, pi, v_geo}. [O] HONEST RESIDUAL: this rigidity holds GIVEN the axioms; it does NOT prove the raw seam REALIZES the structure -- the open bedrock QGEO.SYM.01/SEAM.EQUIV.01 stays [O]. VERDICT: SM structural sector = Q(zeta30)+Galois mu4 x Z2 (rigid, anchor-forced, degree=rank E8); magnitudes = {a,pi}-transcendental (phi0); the only genuinely free datum is v_geo; dimensionless free parameters: 0.

Recorded status: Synthesis/inventory [E] (arithmetic + {a;pi} reduction) + [O] (seam realisation)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: [E] the Q(zeta30)/Galois=mu4 x Z2 skeleton (degree=rank E8) + the anchor-rigidity + the phi0={a,pi} reduction (pure pi, anchor-derived coefficients) + the 0-dimensionless-free-parameter inventory ({a,pi,v_geo}); [O] the seam realisation. A synthesis/inventory capstone of the v313-v317 arc; does NOT close the open bedrock and does NOT add a physical readout.

Dependencies: GALOIS.FAMILY.01; GALOIS.READOUT.01; COX.COUPLE.01; ARCH.CORE.01; NOUNIT.01; v313; v314; v315; v316; v317

Scripts: v318_arithmetic_capstone.py

Location: origin_theory

Original CSV, line 415

Original ledger status

RATE.TRANSLATE.01

RATE.TRANSLATE.01

DO THE DISCRETE-KERNEL AND DYNAMIC RATES TRANSLATE? AN EXACT NUMBER-FIELD SPLIT (2026-06-21, v312/v313 follow-up). [E] FIELD SPLIT: the affine-E8 adjacency spectrum is the rational part {0,+-1,+-2} in Q plus the golden part {+-phi,+-1/phi} in Q(sqrt5) (min poly x^2-x-1, discriminant 5); the dynamic transfer spectrum {1,(2/3)^6,(1/3)^6} is ENTIRELY rational (in Q). [E] TRANSLATION (the (2,3)-fold/family sector): the rational discrete angles 2cos(pi/2)=0 (|Z2|=2) and 2cos(pi/3)=1 (N_fam=3) are the SAME atoms that build the recovery rate (2/3)^6=(|Z2|/N_fam)^(2 N_fam) in Q -- same field, same atoms, so the family/sheet rates DO translate. [E] NO-TRANSLATION (the 5-fold/carrier sector): phi in Q(sqrt5) minus Q has NO rational dynamic image (2/3 is neither an adjacency nor a lazy-update eigenvalue; heat-kernel t=Delta/(2-phi)~6.37 not clean) -- the carrier 5-fold is STATIC-only (builds the lattice/spectrum, not a dynamic rate). [E] SHARED CLOCK: both are facets of the order-30 Coxeter element, 30=h(E8)=g_car*(2 N_fam)=5*6; the golden in the order-5 factor, the recovery exponent 6=2 N_fam=30/g_car in the order-6=2*3 factor. [E] QUASICRYSTAL: E8=H4+phi H4 (240=2*120, 120=|2I|=|R+(E8)|), so the phi cut-and-project carries the 5-fold carrier (Q(sqrt5)) but the cusp weights {0,1/3,2/3} are RATIONAL (3-fold), a separate parabolic datum -- the substrate carries the carrier, NOT the family dynamics (confirms v313/v312). [C]/[O] VERDICT: a static<->dynamic translation functor exists ONLY on the rational (2,3-fold/family) sector; the carrier 5-fold is field-obstructed (static-only), the bridge holding both is the order-30 Coxeter element.

Recorded status: Identity/Lattice [E] (number-field split) + [C]/[O] (functor verdict)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: [E] the Q vs Q(sqrt5) field split of the discrete spectrum + the dynamic-in-Q fact + the (2,3)-sector translation + the 5-fold field obstruction (heat-kernel + eigenvalue negatives) + the order-30 shared clock + the quasicrystal counts; [C]/[O] the translation-functor verdict. Answers the discrete<->dynamic translation question exactly (a field split); does NOT close the substrate question.

Dependencies: GOLD.ATOMS.01; SEAM.EQUIV.GAP.01; v313; v54; v56

Scripts: v314_rate_translation.py

Location: origin_theory

Original CSV, line 416

Original ledger status

TRANSLATE.CLOCK.01

TRANSLATE.CLOCK.01

THE TRANSLATION CLOCK: THE DISCRETE<->DYNAMIC BRIDGE IS THE ORDER-30 COXETER ELEMENT, A CLOCK WITH TWO COPRIME HANDS 5 x 6 (2026-06-22, synthesis of the v313-v318 arc + v124/v55, answering 'is the static<->dynamic translation a clock running 0,1,2,3,4,5 or 1,2,3,4,5?'). [E] TRANSLATION IS A CLOCK: the only object holding both the static carrier (Q(sqrt5)) and the dynamic family (rational) data is the order-30 Coxeter element (v314); 30=h(E8)=g_car*(2 N_fam)=5*6, gcd(5,6)=1 => Z/30=Z/5 x Z/6 (two coprime hands, v315). [E] DYNAMIC HAND RUNS 0..5: the dynamic factor is Z/6=2 N_fam (ticks {0,1,2,3,4,5}); the recovery exponent is EXACTLY 6=|Z/6|=2 N_fam, rate (2/3)^6=(|Z2|/N_fam)^(2 N_fam); the order-6 generator is c^5 (zeta_6=zeta_30^5, the hexagonal CP unit, v316). [E] POSITION 0=THE CONSERVED LAW, 1..=THE LIVE PHASES: the resummed translation clock rate(n)=-p2 ln(1-n/N_fam) (v124) has rate(0)=0 (the attractor/stationary law, eigenvalue 1, v56) and live modes rate(1)=6 ln(3/2), spectrum {1,(2/3)^6,(1/3)^6}; the E8 live phases (Coxeter exponents=totatives of 30) start at 1 ({1,7,...,29}), the 0 phase is NOT a totative -- so '0,1,2,3,4,5' is the law-inclusive labelling, '1,2,3,4,5' the live-only labelling. [E] STATIC HAND RUNS 1..5: the static factor is Z/5=g_car (ticks {1,2,3,4,5}); golden field Q(sqrt5) (phi=2cos(pi/5), min poly x^2-x-1, disc 5), field-obstructed (no rational dynamic image, v314) -- static-only; zeta_5=zeta_30^6 carries no phase (v316). [E] ONE FULL TURN=30: lcm(5,6)=30=h(E8)=the full Coxeter period; rank E8=8=phi(30)=#live phases pairing m+(30-m)=30 into |mu4|=4 invariant planes (v55). [C] VERDICT: the discrete->dynamic translation IS the order-30 clock = (static 5-ring) x (dynamic 6-ring); the dynamic hand {0,...,5} carries the rate (exponent 6=2 N_fam), the static hand {1,...,5} the golden carrier (no rate); '0 vs 1' = law-inclusive vs live-only.

Recorded status: Synthesis/Identity [E] (clock factorization + hand arithmetic) + [C] (one-clock reading)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: [E] the order-30 = 5x6 coprime-hand factorization + the dynamic-hand arithmetic (Z/6=2 N_fam, exponent 6, rate (2/3)^6, zeta_6=zeta_30^5) + the law-vs-live (0 vs 1) reading (rate(0)=0 the attractor, totatives start at 1) + the static-hand golden field-obstruction (Z/5=g_car, no rate) + the one-full-turn=30 Coxeter period; [C] the 'the bridge IS one clock' interpretation. A synthesis of the v313-v318 arc + v124/v55 into the clock picture; does NOT add a physical readout and does NOT close the open bedrock.

Dependencies: RATE.TRANSLATE.01; COX.COUPLE.01; ARITH.CAPSTONE.01; v314; v315; v124; v55

Scripts: v319_translation_clock.py

Location: origin_theory

Original CSV, line 417

Original ledger status

GALOIS.CP.PREDICT.01

GALOIS.CP.PREDICT.01

A NEW FALSIFIABLE PREDICTION FROM THE GALOIS STRUCTURE: THE TWO CP PHASES ARE LOCKED, delta_PMNS = delta_CKM,lead + pi (2026-06-22, the v316 follow-up turned testable). [E] ONE UNIT TWO POWERS: both CP phases are powers of one hexagonal unit rho=zeta_6 in the family Galois factor (v316): delta_CKM,lead=arg(rho)=pi/3 (60 deg), delta_PMNS=arg(rho^4)=4pi/3 (240 deg), rho^4=-rho. [E] FORCED RELATION: delta_PMNS-delta_CKM,lead=pi exactly (the Z2 sheet flip rho^3=-1), equivalently delta_PMNS=4*delta_CKM,lead -- the quark and lepton leading CP phases are NOT independent (one is fixed by the other). [C] PREDICTION OF RECORD: delta_PMNS,lead=240 deg, forced from delta_CKM,lead=60 deg + the sheet flip (180 deg) -- upgrades delta_PMNS from an assigned texture to a Galois-forced relation to the measured quark phase. [N] CURRENTLY COMPATIBLE: 240 deg lies within the broad current global-fit range for the PMNS Dirac phase (NuFIT 6.0, normal ordering); decisive test = DUNE/Hyper-K/JUNO. [X] KILL TEST: a measured delta_PMNS robustly incompatible with delta_CKM,lead+pi=240 deg (beyond the sub-leading budget, at >3 sigma) falsifies the Galois-CP organization (v316/v317). A genuine NEW falsifiable cross-prediction from the v313-v319 arithmetic arc; the leading-order/holonomy reading is [C] like delta_CKM, the relation itself [E], the kill test [X]; does NOT derive the magnitudes.

Recorded status: Identity [E] (Galois relation) + [C] (prediction) + [X] (kill test)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: [E] the exact Galois relation delta_PMNS=delta_CKM,lead+pi (rho^4=-rho, both powers of zeta_6) + the non-triviality; [C] the leading-order prediction delta_PMNS,lead=240 deg; [N] current compatibility; [X] the pre-registered kill test (DUNE/Hyper-K/JUNO). A NEW falsifiable cross-prediction from the Galois arc; does NOT derive magnitudes and does NOT upgrade the CP-phase typing beyond the relation.

Dependencies: GALOIS.READOUT.01; ARITH.CAPSTONE.01; v316; v231; v233

Scripts: v320_galois_cp_relation.py

Location: origin_theory

Original CSV, line 418

Original ledger status

KILL.BOARD.01

KILL.BOARD.01

THE FORWARD KILL-TEST BOARD: THE DECISIVE UPCOMING MEASUREMENTS, RANKED (2026-06-22, forward companion to v307's current-data board). [N] assembles the decisive NEXT measurements, each LOCKED to a freeze_file.csv kill row (so the test and the frozen signal cannot drift apart): #1 JUNO sin^2 theta12=0.306747 (fastest, sub-percent), #2 CMB-S4/LiteBIRD r in [0.0033,0.0048] (kill robust r>0.01), #3 DESI/Euclid w=-1 (kill robust w!=-1), #4 DUNE/Hyper-K delta_PMNS=240deg=delta_CKM,lead+pi (the NEW v320 Galois-CP relation; kill if away from 240 deg at >3 sigma), #5 DUNE/LEGEND/nEXO normal ordering + small m_betabeta, #6 PSI n2EDM theta_eff=0, #7 JUNO sin^2 theta13=0.0231 (now ~2 sigma), #8 LiteBIRD/Simons beta=0.2424 deg. [N] COVERAGE: every entry backed by a freeze_file kill row; the v320 CP relation is on the board; JUNO theta12 rank 1; >=7 decisive tests each with a concrete kill threshold. A forward decision ledger (timelines/reach are the publicly-stated experimental targets, not TFPT outputs); complements v307; no new physics.

Recorded status: Numerical/data [N] (forward decision ledger)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: [N] the ranked forward board (each kill test locked to a freeze_file row) + the v320 CP-relation entry + the JUNO-rank-1 ordering + the power check. A forward decision ledger complementing v307; does NOT add a physical readout.

Dependencies: DATA.WATCHDOG.01; GALOIS.CP.PREDICT.01; REG.FREEZE.01

Scripts: v321_killtest_board.py

Location: origin_theory

Original CSV, line 419

Original ledger status

GALOIS.CP.SHARPEN.01

GALOIS.CP.SHARPEN.01

THE v320 CP-LOCK PREDICTION SHARPENED INTO A QUANTITATIVE PRE-REGISTERED KILL TEST (2026-06-22). [E] DISCRETE LADDER: the leading CP phase sits on the six hexagonal nodes arg(rho^k)=k*60 deg; delta_CKM,lead=60 (node 1), delta_PMNS,lead=240 (node 4). [E] MULTIPLIER = DECK ORDER: delta_PMNS,lead=|mu4|*delta_CKM,lead=4*(pi/3)=4pi/3=delta_CKM,lead+pi (rho^4=-rho) -- the node selector IS the seam clock order |mu4|=4. [C] SUB-LEADING BUDGET: delta_CKM,full=pi/3+3 lambda^2 (~68.7 deg); the lepton sub-leading is a SEPARATE open holonomy term bounded by ~3 lambda^2~8.7 deg => band 240 +- ~9 deg. [N] CURRENT TENSION: vs NuFIT 6.0 NO (delta_CP=212 +26/-41 deg) the leading 240 deg sits at +1.08 sigma, band lower edge ~231 deg at +0.74 sigma -- compatible today. [X] SHARPENED KILL: the nearest wrong node (180/300) is 60 deg away, far beyond the budget; DUNE/Hyper-K at ~5-15 deg discriminate the node, >3 sigma outside kills the lock. [E] DISCRIMINATION POWER: an anarchic delta_CP hits the band with p~5% and node 4 (not 1/3/5) 1-in-6. Sharpens v320; no magnitudes derived.

Recorded status: Identity [E] (node+multiplier) + [C] (budget) + [N] (tension) + [X] (kill test)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: [E] the discrete hexagonal node + the |mu4| multiplier + the discrimination geometry; [C] the sub-leading budget (the lepton holonomy term is only bounded by the quark analog, not closed); [N] the +1.08 sigma current tension; [X] the sharpened pre-registered kill test (node discrimination). Sharpens v320; does NOT derive magnitudes or upgrade the CP typing.

Dependencies: GALOIS.CP.PREDICT.01; GALOIS.READOUT.01; v320; v316

Scripts: v322_cp_lock_sharpened.py

Location: origin_theory

Original CSV, line 420

Original ledger status

QGEO.BW.01

QGEO.BW.01

THE KEYSTONE PUSHED ONE STEP -- BISOGNANO-WICHMANN MAKES THE SEAM MODULAR FLOW GEOMETRIC (2026-06-22): the mu4 deck invariance is NOT an independent axiom. [E] CLOCK = GEOMETRIC ROTATION: rho=diag(i^n)=exp(i(pi/2)L), L=diag(n) the seam rotation generator; rho^4=exp(i2pi L)=I -- mu4 in U(1)_rot (quarter turns). [E] BW: a rotation-covariant covariance C=f(L) gives K=log((1-C)/C)=g(L), so [K,L]=0 (the modular flow commutes with all rotations) AND [rho,K]=[rho,C]=0 -- the mu4 clock is a modular symmetry FOR FREE (no fine-tuned curvature, unlike v309). [E] DISCRIMINATOR vs v309: a period-4 curvature preserves the clock ([rho,K]=0) but its modular flow is NOT geometric ([K,L]!=0) -- BW is strictly stronger (pins the whole rotation group, not just mu4). [E] NEG: a non-rotation-covariant C breaks [rho,K]!=0. [C] LINKED BEDROCK: GIVEN the seam is the (E8)_1 chiral net (v308/SEAM.EQUIV.01), Bisognano-Wichmann/Hislop-Longo make the vacuum modular flow geometric => QGEO.SYM.01 (omega o rho=omega) is DOWNSTREAM of SEAM.EQUIV.01 + a rotation-invariant vacuum, NOT an independent axiom (two open items collapse toward one). [O] residual: the raw collar vacuum is rotation-invariant (cleaner than v309's bespoke thermal state, shared with v308). Sharpens v309/v198; does NOT close QGEO.SYM.01.

Recorded status: Reduction [E]/[C]/[O] (BW geometric modular flow)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: [E] the finite-model BW construction (rotation-covariant C => geometric modular flow + a free clock symmetry) + the v309 discriminator (period-4 preserves the clock but is not geometric); [C] the linkage to v308 via the cited BW/Hislop-Longo theorem (QGEO.SYM.01 downstream of SEAM.EQUIV.01); [O] rotation-invariance of the raw seam. Sharpens v309; does NOT close the bedrock.

Dependencies: QGEO.SYM.01; QGEO.MODHAM.01; SEAM.EQUIV.CHAIN.01; v308; v309; v198

Scripts: v323_bw_geometric_modular.py

Location: origin_theory

Original CSV, line 421

Original ledger status

HYP.FIBER.01

HYP.FIBER.01

THE MINIMAL HYPERGRAPH SUBSTRATE THAT WORKS -- A (2,3,5)-NETWORK FIBERED BY A 3-FOLD CUSP CHANNEL (2026-06-22, the constructive v312 follow-up): reproduces BOTH the E8 skeleton AND the recovery gap. [E] NETWORK FACTOR (carrier/5-fold): T_net=(A+2I)/4 fixes the Kac marks (eigenvalue 1 = E8 skeleton), subleading (phi+2)/4 (golden); (2/3)^6 NOT in its spectrum (the v312 negative). [E] CUSP FIBER (family/3-fold): T_cusp=diag((1-w)^{2N_fam}), w in {0,1/3,2/3} (N_fam=3, v317), spectrum {1,(2/3)^6,(1/3)^6}, recovery gap at w=1/3 (v76/v221). [E] FIBERED SUBSTRATE CARRIES BOTH: T=T_net (x) T_cusp has top eigenvalue 1 (eigenvector marks (x) w=0 = E8 skeleton x democratic cusp) AND (2/3)^6 as a genuine eigenvalue (network attractor x cusp subleading). [E] HONEST INJECTION (v312): without the fiber (T_net (x) I_3) there is NO (2/3)^6 -- the cusp datum is injected, not graph-spectral; substrate = network x cusp = the v315 split 30=g_car*(2 N_fam)=5*6, the gap living entirely in the family factor. [E] MINIMALITY: the smallest fiber is the 3-node cusp (=N_fam); a 2-node fiber cannot hold 3 weights -> minimal substrate = (2,3,5)-net x 3-cusp = order-30 (v319 clock). [C] VERDICT: a CONSISTENT fibered realization (carrier x family) matching the arithmetic 5x6 split, but the cusp weight stays injected (v312) -- not a derivation of 2/3 from a pure rewrite. Sharpens v312; the open rewrite question is unchanged.

Recorded status: Construction [E]/[C] (fibered substrate)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: [E] the fibration construction (T_net (x) T_cusp carries the skeleton + the gap) + the v312 negative (no gap without the fiber); [C] the 'minimal substrate = carrier x family' reading matching the v315 5x6 split; [O] deriving the cusp weight from a pure rewrite stays open. Sharpens v312; not a closure.

Dependencies: HYP.INJECT.01; COX.COUPLE.01; GALOIS.FAMILY.01; v312; v315; v317; v319; v221; v76

Scripts: v324_hypergraph_fiber.py

Location: origin_theory

Original CSV, line 422

Original ledger status

FORM.SEAMEQUIV.01

FORM.SEAMEQUIV.01

LEAN: SEAM.EQUIV.01 COMPOSITION CHAIN (2026-06-22). Lean 4 formalisation (TfptCarrier/SeamEquivChain.lean) of the v308 closing chain: the four nodes GapPositive -> InvertibleSRE -> HolomorphicC8 -> SeamIsE8 assembled as a well-typed composition theorem seamEquivChain, with the three cited literature steps (Kitaev free-fermion invertibility; Mueger / Kawahigashi-Longo-Mueger holomorphy; Conway-Sloane E8 uniqueness) declared as named axioms and the carrier recovery gap (the OS step) as the single open input. #print axioms seamEquivChain confirms the residual is EXACTLY those named steps + recovery_gap (no hidden assumption). Plus a decide-proven discriminator: primariesE8=1 != primariesD8=4 (|det Cartan| distinguishes the holomorphic E8 from the same-central-charge rival D8=SO(16)). Built end-to-end (lake build, 3357 jobs) on Lean v4.29.1 + Mathlib. The VALUE is the machine-checked composition + the axiom audit (which pins the keystone residual to the named cited theorems + the one OS input), NOT a from-scratch proof of the cited steps -- so it does NOT close SEAM.EQUIV.01.

Recorded status: Formal

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: [E] Lean-built: the well-typed composition seamEquivChain + the axiom audit (residual = the named cited theorems + the one OS input) + the decide-proven discriminator (1 != 4). A formal audit-contract skeleton of the v308 keystone chain; the three literature steps are named axioms (cited, not re-proved), so it MACHINE-PINS the residual but does NOT close SEAM.EQUIV.01.

Dependencies: SEAM.EQUIV.CHAIN.01; SEAM.EQUIV.01; SEAM.EQUIV.GAP.01

Scripts: v308_seam_equiv_chain.py

Location: lean4-carrier-rigidity/TfptCarrier/SeamEquivChain.lean

Original CSV, line 423

Original ledger status

QGEO.KEYSTONE.01

QGEO.KEYSTONE.01

THE SEAM KEYSTONE AS ONE CITABLE THEOREM (2026-06-22): the raw seam state is the flat tau=i pillowcase state, with EXACTLY ONE open lemma. Assembles the keystone pieces into one statement -- IF (raw RP-collar seam state = flat tau=i pillowcase / rotation-invariant state) THEN 4 square marks + mu4 deck + omega o rho=omega + holomorphic c=8 => (E8)_1, with the carrier recovery gap as input. [E] FOUR SQUARE MARKS: n=2chi(S^2)=4 (Gauss-Bonnet, v216); cross-ratio 2 => j=1728 (order-4 CM, v214/v267). [E] FLAT PILLOWCASE: S^2(2,2,2,2), chi_orb=2-4(1-1/2)=0 => flat tau=i (Troyanov). [E] MU4 FINGERPRINT: DtN sub-principal at m=0 mod 4 (v201/v280). [E] HOLOMORPHY SELECTOR: det Cartan(E8)=1 vs D8=4 (v83/v143/v308). [E] INPUT GAP: Delta=6 ln(3/2)>0 (v76/v302). [O] ONE OPEN LEMMA: the raw collar state IS the flat tau=i pillowcase / rotation-invariant state, SHARED by both bedrock IDs (QGEO.SYM.01, SEAM.EQUIV.01; v323), machine-pinned in Lean (FORM.SEAMEQUIV.01 + FORM.QGEO.BW.01). An assembly/reduction certificate (like v176/v261), NOT a closure.

Recorded status: Synthesis/reduction [E]/[O] (keystone-as-one-theorem)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: [E] the assembled keystone theorem with all exact pieces machine-checked (marks=4, j=1728, chi_orb=0, det Cartan E8=1, gap>0, mod-4 fingerprint); [O] the single open lemma (raw seam = flat tau=i pillowcase / rotation-invariant state) shared by both bedrock IDs and Lean-pinned. An assembly certificate (like v176/v261), does NOT close the bedrock.

Dependencies: QGEO.SYM.01; SEAM.EQUIV.01; QGEO.BW.01; v214; v216; v280; v308; v323; v76

Scripts: v325_pillowcase_keystone.py

Location: origin_theory

Original CSV, line 424

Original ledger status

FR.SUITE.01

FR.SUITE.01

THE F_transfer SOLVER SUITE (2026-06-22): the four transfer readouts as ONE runnable harness, each a gapped relaxation to a unique attractor, with values + uncertainties + honest typing (productises FR.DYNAMICS.01/v303). [E] F_pole (Koide): Moebius contraction to Q*=2/3 with multiplier (2/3)^6 = the seam-clock subleading eigenvalue, unique attractor at the SEAM rate. [C] F_Boltzmann (eta_B): washout contraction to the balance 6.1e-11, monotone (H-theorem), external thermal rate. [C] F_relic (axion): the comoving number N=E/omega is the adiabatic invariant, the relic freezes (seed theta_i=3pi/5), cosmological rate. [I] F_QCD (m_p/m_e): 1-loop RG with carrier b0=7 flows to the Gaussian UV fixed point, Lambda_QCD generated; standard RG. [N] F_RareKaon (bridge): BR(K+)=9.45e-11 on NA62 2016-2024 (v202). [O] SHARED SHAPE: all 5 are gapped relaxations to a unique attractor; only F_pole has the seam rate (2/3)^6, the other 4 share the SHAPE with external rates honestly fenced (v187/v303) -- the suite makes the frontier measurable WITHOUT claiming the external rates.

Recorded status: Numerical/synthesis [E]/[C]/[I] (F_transfer solver suite)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: [E] the F_pole seam-rate contraction; [C] the Boltzmann/relic relaxations (shape, external rates); [I] the QCD RG flow; [N] the rare-kaon bridge. A productisation/solver harness of v303, NOT a new claim; the external rates stay honestly fenced.

Dependencies: FR.DYNAMICS.01; v303; v82; v184; v185; v202

Scripts: v326_ftransfer_suite.py

Location: origin_theory

Original CSV, line 425

Original ledger status

HYP.REWRITE.01

HYP.REWRITE.01

DERIVING THE CUSP WEIGHT 2/3 FROM A MINIMAL REWRITE (2026-06-22, sharpening HYP.FIBER.01/v324 + HYP.INJECT.01/v312). A minimal local rule -- a family channel with N_fam=3 slots, one absorbing attractor (w=0) and |Z2|=2 surviving (the Z2 pair) -- supplies the cusp fiber. [E] MINIMAL REWRITE: M=[[1,0,0],[0,1/3,1/3],[0,1/3,1/3]] has spectrum {1,2/3,0}; the recovery survival 2/3=(N_fam-1)/N_fam=|Z2|/N_fam EMERGES from the rule arity, not injected. [E] RECOVERY RATE DERIVED: over the order-6=2 N_fam dynamic hand the rate is (2/3)^6=64/729 = the recovery gap (v76/v324), derived not put in. [E] NON-GRAPH-SPECTRAL (proof, sharpening v312): 2/3 is NOT a root of the affine-E8 charpoly x(x^2-4)(x^2-1)(x^2-x-1)(x^2+x-1) (p(2/3)=-3520/19683 != 0), so the recovery rate cannot be an adjacency eigenvalue -- necessarily the branching channel. [E] ATTRACTOR: the absorbing state (eigenvalue 1) is the democratic w=0 law (v317). [O] HONEST RESIDUAL: the rewrite DERIVES 2/3 from the arity {|Z2|,N_fam}={2,3} (the anchor atoms, still the input P2/v23) -- v324's injected datum REDUCED to the anchor arity, not derived from nothing. UPDATE 2026-07-15 (v486/HYP.REWRITE.02): the uniform rule is the DEGENERATE case (spectrum {2/3, 0}); the unique lazy Z2-pair walk (stay 1/2, hop 1/6, leak 1/3) generates the FULL physical spectrum {1, (2/3)^6, (1/3)^6} over the same order-6 hand -- the (1/3)^6 mode now has a local-rule origin; superseded as full-spectrum generator, the 2/3 arity story unchanged.

Recorded status: Construction/proof [E]/[O] (cusp weight from a minimal rewrite)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: [E] the rule spectrum {1,2/3,0} + the recovery-rate derivation (2/3)^6 + the non-graph-spectral PROOF p(2/3)!=0; [O] the arity {2,3} is still the anchor input. Sharpens v324/v312 (the injected datum reduced to the anchor arity); not a derivation of the atoms.

Dependencies: HYP.FIBER.01; HYP.INJECT.01; v312; v324; v317; v76

Scripts: v327_hypergraph_rewrite.py

Location: origin_theory

Original CSV, line 426

Open questions preserve their achieved subresults

Each research problem has its own scope. A resolved task does not close its whole physical parent. Historical tasks remain explicitly historical in the source record.

Future quotient and positive GNS reconstruction

What is determined by complete future behavior, and what additional positive word-kernel source is needed to reconstruct a cyclic operator realization?

  • Resolved in scope: Future quotient from complete rRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Conditional GNS reconstruction from supplied KRead result
  • open: Select complete K from the original source
Historical: common source, state and event selection

Outside the active mathematical research program since the user's23Oct2026 decision. Historical question: Do the original principles derive a common physical source together with its state, dynamical events, and physically observed fields?

Seam connection and family action

Does the joint discrete theorem determine a concrete connection and a family coupling compatible with the determinant seam action?

  • Resolved in scope: Separate classes from actual transportRead result
  • open: Derive the common connection from the original source
Physical time and complete transfer

Do the original reflection/projector structures determine the full physical time generator and required field transfer?

  • Resolved in scope: Reuse the sign-projector counterexampleRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Reuse conditional full-transfer reconstructionRead result
  • open: Identify the physical complete TFPT transfer
  • Resolved in scope: Reuse complete collar reconstructionRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Classify homogeneous GKLS embedding of the shared register familyRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Decide every homogeneous GKSL logarithm of the fixed M4 channelRead result
Flavor ratio and absolute amplitude scale

Which flavor quantity is fixed on the derived discrete stratum, and which requires the continuous holonomy anchor?

  • Resolved in scope: Reuse the derived flavor ratioRead result
  • open: Determine the absolute holonomy amplitude
Alpha: derived terms, unique root and physical EM identification

Where do the factors and closed alpha equation come from, which provenance steps are proved, and which precise physical EM identification remains open?

  • Resolved in scope: Separate root calculation from source selectionRead result
  • open: Derive the actual EM functional variation and Thomson identification
  • Resolved in scope: Establish the unique global positive rootRead result
Geometric flow and gravity normalization

Do common matter-only observations derive geometric horizon flow and the area response from the original gravity source?

  • Resolved in scope: Record scope of fixed original functionalRead result
  • open: Derive geometric modular response and area coefficient
Clocks and complete neutral source response

Which complete quadratic response can the actual clock images reconstruct?

  • Resolved in scope: Reconstruct all neutral quadratic matrix directionsRead result
  • open: Derive physically admissible probe access
Clock action on charge, time and quarter transition

How does the actual Gaussian J act on the complete marked source?

  • Resolved in scope: Construct original J lift with complete time/charge actionRead result
  • open: Derive physical meaning of the frame orbit
Which responses distinguish charged time action?

Which data separate sources with identical complete neutral vacuum response?

  • Resolved in scope: Determine twist blindness completelyRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Reconstruct twist from charged responsesRead result
  • open: Derive actual charged source probes
Which seam action distinguishes native opposite charges?

Can existing native charge fields produce the quarter-twist time response of the seam?

  • Resolved in scope: Check native fields and response discriminatorRead result
  • open: Derive actual marked seam/state action
Constructive seam search: operators, state and source compatibility

What does the complete phase search decide, and which additional state information prevents a false source solution?

  • Resolved in scope: Finite search closed, actual winding and parity equivalenceRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Positive finite-word state extensionRead result
  • Resolved in scope: E8 current group conditionally determines the P signRead result
  • Resolved in scope: The same shift functional hides distinct ground statesRead result
  • Resolved in scope: No phase hit realizes the unchanged sourceRead result
Which partner actually belongs to the original seam?

Which charge, state type and time action belong to the root partner and original sheet pairing?

  • Resolved in scope: Concrete pair operator; source neutrality is not hypercharge neutralityRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Fixed quarter time splits the color/weak multipletRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Explicit conjugation for the existing sheet pairingRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Actual partner map between quarter domainsRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Bilinear sheet pairing is not Hermitian kernel selectionRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Actual quarter conjugation transports the supplied markingRead result
  • Resolved in scope: No time-stabilizing orthogonal repair of the fixed markingRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Spinor16 is a state sector, not a 16-real one-particle fieldRead result
Automated construction of operator maps and sources

Which tools generate operator maps, learn counterexamples, and can search for the full positive source?

  • Resolved in scope: Calibrate new search without supplying the target mapRead result
  • open: Synthesize a joint field, marking and transfer dictionary
  • open: Search for the positive common source kernel itself
  • Resolved in scope: Automatically construct, certify and distinguish finite kernelsRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Repair search conditions against source types and collar controlsRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Reconstruct multi-field sewing of the canonically identified boundary sourceRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Retain absolute reference amplitude in searchRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Integrate supplied free source including boundary response and scalarRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Convert the full finite CAR kernel into a link functionalRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Close original recursive word reconstruction with memoryRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Retain whole original caller through scale and readoutRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute actual shared Higgs source with full matter words and local RPRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Reduce whole constant original Higgs spectral fiberRead result
  • open: Resolve original geometric Higgs residue sign and field map
  • Resolved in scope: Evaluate local original Higgs heat identification and whole finite consumerRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute whole variable bound Higgs reference and original scale mapRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute whole inner Higgs scale/source and normal kernel transportRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute given whole superconnection and normal spectral readerRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Determine own-admissibility and whole total-chiral spectral readersRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Derive whole scale-energy map,normal profile and relative flowRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute original Green energy producer and mixed scale readoutRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Match current action argument and common Higgs/gravity weightsRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute whole original curvature consumers and Higgs radial sourceRead resultRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute original whole four-ghost source and geometric type testRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute original moving normal kernel derivative and whole source responseRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Decide fixed original O1 source and normal operator placementRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Compare whole Higgs mixture and covariance reader on invariant four-field witnessRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Test exact bounded cutoff on whole ordinary Higgs volumeRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Test whole original circle joint mode and IR Higgs normalizationRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Test original O1 mode covariance against whole Higgs-law classRead result
  • open: Reconstruct original localization from the whole process
  • Resolved in scope: Test bare native-code word compression against actual localityRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Decide original geometric local-time class and execute actual interval readerRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute actual regional two-face partner and supported charged wordRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute original color marginal, modular field law and complete class readerRead resultRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Reconstruct common Higgs law from whole original quarter source towerRead resultRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute original record action on Doily and ordered whole source responseRead resultRead resultRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Locally implement original record process and test unchanged exterior sourceRead resultRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute original elliptic insertion,whole source and causal responseRead resultRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Evaluate actual joint Higgs and color group sourceRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute whole original graph color reader with typed original center selectorRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute original color fixed source and first inherited grading testRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute actual original color-spinor CAR four-word and complete spin-sector sewingRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Decide actual color admissibility of density operations and coordinate regionsRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute actual whole seam-operation class and two-face responseRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute entire original C6 word expansion with source amplitudeRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute original collective Higgs force source and entire mean dualRead resultRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute original all-mode force with actual time and whole sourceRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute original local space/time force source and causal liftRead resultRead result
Origin reverse selection, field dictionary and original P1 kernel

What does reverse selection of P1/P2 give for concrete local fields and multi-field responses, and which identification with the original P1 kernel has actually been proved?

Observable reality: minimal conditions and counterworlds

Which operational conditions are independently required, which inequivalent models satisfy them, and which observable distinctions remain for selection?

Formal carrier core: unbounded Pascal uniqueness and finite glue

Which carrier and glue statements are already present in the papers and Lean sources, and which physical selection does not follow?

  • Resolved in scope: Classify the unbounded Pascal proofRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Classify the formal finite glue scopeRead result
Active mathematical program: marked seam monodromies and lattice lifts

Which marked seam/lattice transport geometries, lift classes and local-coefficient invariants arise from existing clock/reflection/quartic data? First complete case: sign lifts of fourJ representation on CP1 minusμ4.

  • Resolved in scope: Define marked seam category and factor formulaRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Completely classify quarter-clock four-puncture liftsRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Determine central class and all subgroup restrictionsRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Determine full G0 cocycle and classRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Determine native4/5/6local cohomologyRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Classify unrestricted G31 reflection monodromiesRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Determine lift class beyond G0Read result
  • open: Classify additional reflection/clock equivariance and mapping-class quotients
  • Resolved in scope: Equivariant lifting and divisibility by eightRead result
  • Resolved in scope: All62clock obstructions and central transport variantsRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Actual group comparison and central pushout exclusionRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Complete invariants and explicit collisionsRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Compare E6 and E7 slices with the actual quarter clockRead resultRead resultRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Classify original character-valued G31monodromy liftsRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Determine E7-pair action on all original lattice fieldsRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Completely connect E6/E7 cuts to the original compilerRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Compare common covers and actual clock carriersRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Prove shared representation consequence for48,4/3 and5/4Read result
  • Resolved in scope: Completely decide joint compiler-field-cover constructionRead resultRead resultRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Reconstruct canonical local compiler field source from C4Read resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Eliminate redundant sector and multiplicity assumptionsRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Classify native equivariant markingsRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Classify pure quarter clock mapping class quotientRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Determine complete cut algebra and lossless tetrahedron transformRead resultRead resultRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Completely compare scalar glue and actual native compiler classRead resultRead resultRead resultRead result
Common clock sectors, quartic geometry and operational reconstruction

Which previously separate data of the original TFPT core follow from a common clock and representation geometry, and which complete finite measurement classification follows without asserting physical source selection?

Automatic response search with original-source decision

Which additional joint response actually follows from original source equations, and which entire finite process family remains undecided without it?