Skip to main content
Back to the knowledge atlas

Original claim records.

The original technical record remains available here. For explanations, reviewed conclusions and the history of research questions, start with the knowledge atlas.

Research snapshot 2026-11-02 · 783 active ledger claims · 710 scientific findings · 707 registered scripts. These are different inventories, not counts of independent physical confirmations.

What does this inventory cover?

Every one of the 783 active ledger IDs is included. All 788 ledger rows, including superseded rows, remain in the download. The reviewed research corpus contains 711 findings; 1 administrative record is excluded from public scientific content, with the omission recorded in the coverage file.

The scientific findings include 519 established scoped results, 63 conditional results and 128 scoped exclusions. These labels describe the recorded finding. They do not upgrade its parent physical goal or overwrite the original ledger.

Sources were matched to their recorded hashes and line ranges at this snapshot. Bounded text excerpts make sources available even when a source is not in the earlier public release. Any omitted administrative lines are explicitly marked. This is source coverage, not a new execution of Python, Lean or Wolfram proofs.

Atlas revision 2c1b559b738e5740ecfad8e6 · snapshot SHA256 68c2fe33ce86d45a99a8c21b1e731e40749d0accb3ae69be53d198cd7ebcb48e

1493 matching records · page 23 of 75

Original ledger status

RESIDUAL.CERTIFICATION.01

RESIDUAL.CERTIFICATION.01

Historical compiler-residual audit (2026-06-23; scope corrected 2026-09-05): v384 classifies the then-listed compiler residual into three external kinds, (A) external math proof, (B) theorem-forbidden, and (C) external physics. It does not classify the physical completeness gates T1-T8 and does not imply zero open internal TFPT mechanisms. [E] LEDGER CI: every claim in that historical residual list is present in status_ledger.csv. [E] NO-UNIT: a dimensionless compiler cannot derive the absolute scale v_geo. [E] CHECKED GAP-DECOUPLING: Delta_eff=6 ln(3/2)-31/(4 pi^2)~1.648>0 for the audited readouts. [E] HISTORICAL CLASSIFICATION: SEAM.EQUIV.01 and ALPHA.QUILLEN.EXACT.01 -> A; QG.AMB.01 -> A; v_geo -> B; F_transfer -> C. [O] CURRENT TOE FENCE: TFPT.TOE.COMPLETE.01 and every T1-T8 gate remain open; missing dynamics and continuum mechanisms, including a shared 3+1D parent satisfying T3-T8, are outside v384's scope.

Recorded status: Historical compiler-residual audit [E]; explicitly not a TOE-completeness audit. TFPT.TOE.COMPLETE.01 and all T1-T8 remain Open [O].

Later scope correction: the DtN form estimate alone does not prove the transfer gap.

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: [E] ledger CI, No-Unit dimensionlessness, checked gap-decoupling margin and three-way classification within the historical compiler residual only. [O] no statement about T1-T8 closure; the audit closes nothing and introduces no number.

Dependencies: SEAM.EQUIV.01; ALPHA.QUILLEN.EXACT.01; QG.AMB.01; ANCHOR.VGEO.01; FR.POLE.SOLVE.01; TFPT.TOE.COMPLETE.01; v153; v336; v369; v337; v187

Scripts: v384_residual_certification.py

Location: tfpt_research_contracts

Original CSV, line 447

Original ledger status

UVBRANCH.KILLTEST.01

UVBRANCH.KILLTEST.01

The optional carrier-Pati-Salam UV branch on the ALL-ORDER footing -- a single citable kill-test surface with the proton-decay SAFETY hierarchy computed (2026-06-24). A consolidation: does NOT re-run the RGE (v246 did 1+2-loop) nor re-derive the PS scale (v249/v253); it ADDS the all-order connection (v381) and the computed proton-safety margin (turning v265's 'no fake tau_p window' policy into a number). [E] CARRIER CONTENT = SM, ALL-ORDER: b=(41/10,-19/6,-7) (v159/v246), no new gauge-charged states (tfpt_3), S_pert closes to all orders (v381) => the SM-non-unification (v246) is all-order-robust. [X] PLAIN-SM 4D-GUT KILLED: sin^2 thW=3/8 vs measured 0.231, 1+2-loop couplings never meet (v246). [C] OPTIONAL CARRIER-PS BRANCH: M_PS=kappa*M_scal, M_scal=c3^{7/2}Mbar~3.06e13 GeV, kappa in [1.0,1.2] (2-loop v253), content {1,10,16,45} no 126 (v247/v248), NOT the default (v265 fork). [E] PROTON-DECAY SAFETY HIERARCHY: minimal PS gauge bosons are SU(4) leptoquarks (B-L-conserving q<->l = rare LFV K_L->mu e), NOT the p->e+ pi0 dim-6 operator (needs an SO(10)/SU(5) diquark, absent); the binding bound M_PS>~1e6 GeV is cleared by M_PS/M_bound~1e7>>1 => proton-safe. [X] FROZEN KILL TESTS (v265): the branch dies if kappa leaves O(1) / a forbidden rep (126) is required / a new gauge-charged state appears / a rare-LFV signal appears below the M_PS bound; NO discovery tau_p window.

Recorded status: UV-branch kill-test surface [E]/[X]/[C] (carrier-PS on the all-order footing; proton-SAFE hierarchy computed; plain-SM GUT killed; no fake tau_p)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: [E] the all-order-robustness link (v381) + the proton-safety scale hierarchy (M_PS/M_bound~1e7); [X] the plain-SM-GUT kill + the frozen kill-test surface; [C] the optional PS branch. A consolidation (like v265/v337/v384); does NOT re-run the RGE or claim a tau_p discovery; no new number.

Dependencies: v159; v246; v247; v248; v249; v253; v265; v381

Scripts: v385_uvbranch_killtest.py

Location: tfpt_5_redteam

Original CSV, line 448

Original ledger status

GRAV.AMPLITUDE.01

GRAV.AMPLITUDE.01

The entire-form-factor graviton-exchange AMPLITUDE is finite, UV-softened and tree-unitary (2026-06-24) -- perturbative gravity as an explicit scattering problem, extending v304/v370/v380 from the propagator to the amplitude. The dressed spin-2 propagator P(p^2)=e^{-p^2/M^2}/p^2=1/(p^2 a) with a(u)=e^u (u=p^2/M^2), M=M_scal. [E] ONE POLE, GHOST-FREE: a=e^u entire and nowhere zero (v380) => the only pole is p^2=0 with residue lim p^2 P=e^0=1>0 (one healthy massless graviton). [E] UV-SOFTENED: the dressed/GR ratio e^{-u} at u=1,5,10,20 = 0.37,6.7e-3,4.5e-5,2.1e-9 -- suppressed faster than any power (infinite-derivative improvement), monotone->0. [E] LOW-ENERGY = GR + CALCULABLE CORRECTION: e^{-u}=1-u+u^2/2-...; the leading deviation -u=-p^2/M^2 (M=M_scal=c3^{7/2}Mbar~3.06e13 GeV, v253). [C] TREE UNITARITY: a single positive-residue pole, no extra poles / negative-norm states (entire zero-free form factor) => Im A>=0, consistent with v370 (spin-2) + v380 (entire). [C] AMPLITUDE STRUCTURE: A=(kappa^2/2)(T.P2.T')e^{-p^2/M^2}/p^2, GR at low energy, softened in the UV (P2 = Barnes-Rivers spin-2 projector, v370); perturbative-only (QG.AMB.01 stays a [C] redundancy, v369).

Recorded status: Perturbative graviton amplitude [E]/[C] (entire-form-factor exchange: finite, ghost-free, UV-softened, tree-unitary; perturbative-only)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: [E] the single positive-residue pole + the UV softening (e^{-u} faster than any power) + the GR limit and first correction; [C] the tree unitarity and the amplitude structure (perturbative-only). Extends v304/v370/v380 from propagator to amplitude; does NOT touch the non-perturbative measure (QG.AMB.01); the scale M=M_scal (v253) and the form factor = the seam KMS cutoff (v259), no new number.

Dependencies: v259; v304; v370; v380; v253; v369

Scripts: v386_grav_amplitude.py

Location: tfpt_4_frontier

Original CSV, line 449

Original ledger status

CORRECTIONS.GAP.01

CORRECTIONS.GAP.01

The practical harvest of v383 (2026-06-24): the same spectral gap that makes each sector parameter-free ALSO sets the SIZE of its first correction -- for a gapped operator the deviation from the attractor decays at the ratio lambda_2/lambda_1 per step, so that ratio IS the leading-correction size. [E] FLAVOR: lambda_1=1, lambda_2=(2/3)^6=64/729 => first Koide correction ~0.0878 (v56/v82). [E] RECOVERY: the seam QECC Petz rate is the same (2/3)^6 (v221). [E] QG DECOUPLING: the ambient correction is bounded by chi=1/(1-(2/3)^6)=729/665 (finite, v337). [E] DISCRETE COMPILER: the main-branch update T_net=(A+2I)/4 fixes the Kac marks (lambda_1=1) and has subleading lambda_2=(phi+2)/4~0.9045 -- the compiler transient decays at the golden rate (carrier-5 facet, v303/v312). [E] UNIFIED: correction_n~(lambda_2/lambda_1)^n everywhere; the rates split into the (2/3)^6 family (flavor/recovery/QG, family-3 dynamic, in Q) and the golden family (the compiler, carrier-5 static, in Q(sqrt5)) -- the two number-field facets of v314/v383. [C] the correction calculus: the gap does double duty -- it is both WHY there is no free parameter and HOW BIG the first correction is, so the magnitude of sub-leading effects across TFPT is organised, not free.

Recorded status: Correction calculus [E]/[C] (each sector's gap sets its first-correction size; (2/3)^6 family vs golden family; the harvest of v383)

Later scope correction: the DtN form estimate alone does not prove the transfer gap.

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: [E] the four computed correction rates + the unified (lambda_2/lambda_1)^n form + the two-facet split (Q vs Q(sqrt5)); [C] the correction-calculus reading. A harvest/application of v383 (as v303/v337 are of v56); reuses established eigenvalues, introduces no new number.

Dependencies: v56; v82; v221; v303; v312; v314; v337; v383

Scripts: v387_corrections_gap.py

Location: origin_theory

Original CSV, line 450

Original ledger status

CORRECTIONS.BUDGET.01

CORRECTIONS.BUDGET.01

The gap correction (v387) is a TYPED budget, NOT a uniform band on every prediction (2026-06-24): the (lambda_2/lambda_1)^n size is a property of the distance from a gapped operator's leading eigenvector, so it is only defined where a subleading lambda_2 exists. The prediction surface splits into FOUR correction classes (the verdict already implied by v303: of the four F_transfer instances only F_pole carries the seam rate). [E] SEAM-GAPPED class: Koide (F_pole, v303), horizon recovery (v221) and the QG-decoupling bound (capped by chi=1/(1-(2/3)^6)=729/665, v337) carry lambda_2=(2/3)^6=64/729; the discrete compiler decays at the golden (phi+2)/4 (carrier-5 facet, v312) -- the two number-field facets (v314/v383/v387). [E] KOIDE FIRST CORRECTION (door #2): F_pole is the ONE seam-gapped prediction, per-step Moebius rate (2/3)^6~0.0878 (v371), while the source quotient Q_src=0.66446 sits 0.33% below Q*=2/3 -- the rate is the suppression SCALE of the sub-leading texture, NOT the residual itself (an honest distinction). [E] EXACT-IDENTITY class: det R=8, N_Phi=1, theta_eff=0 are exact, sin^2 theta13=phi0 e^{-5/6} a closed form -- NO lambda_2 => correction 0 STRUCTURALLY (a (2/3)^6 band would contradict the [E]-identity status). [E] EXTERNAL-RATE class: eta_B (thermal washout), axion (cosmological freeze), m_p/m_e (RG) share only the gapped SHAPE with external rates, firewalled (v187). [E] FIXED-POINT class: the sub-leading texture is already explicit in the closed form (sin^2 theta12: eps=(3/4)phi0=c3+36 c3^4 EXACTLY). [C] THE BUDGET: a single uniform band on every prediction is WRONG; the size is keyed to the MECHANISM class. A typing of v387 (as v384 is of v383), no new number.

Recorded status: Typed correction budget [E]/[C] (the gap correction is keyed to the mechanism class, not a uniform band; seam-gapped=(2/3)^6/golden, exact-identity=0, external-rate=external, fixed-point=explicit texture)

Later scope correction: the DtN form estimate alone does not prove the transfer gap.

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: [E] the four-class classification + the seam (2/3)^6 and golden (phi+2)/4 rates + the exact-identity zero-correction facts (det R=8, N_Phi=1, theta_eff=0) + the explicit theta12 texture (eps=c3+36 c3^4); [C] the typed-correction-budget reading. A typing of v387 (as v384 is of v383); reuses established eigenvalues and closed forms, introduces no new number.

Dependencies: v303; v371; v383; v387; v314; v337; v221; v312; v187

Scripts: v388_corrections_budget.py

Location: origin_theory

Original CSV, line 451

Original ledger status

GRAV.LOOP.FINITE.01

GRAV.LOOP.FINITE.01

The entire-form-factor graviton is UV-finite at the LOOP level by power counting (2026-06-24) -- the honest next step past v386 (which established the tree amplitude), extending v304/v370/v380/v386 from the propagator to the superficial degree of divergence of loop graphs. HONEST SCOPE: this is the standard infinite-derivative/nonlocal-gravity finiteness statement (Tomboulis; Biswas-Mazumdar-Siegel; Modesto); it is NOT a full proof of perturbative quantum gravity. [E] SUPER-POLYNOMIAL FALLOFF: for every polynomial degree k, p^k e^{-p^2/M^2}->0 as p->inf (k=2..20), so the dressed propagator cannot leave a power-counting divergence. [E] ONE DRESSED LINE KILLS A QUADRATIC DIVERGENCE: int_{p0}^Lambda p^3(e^{-p^2/M^2}/p^2)dp -> (M^2/2)e^{-p0^2/M^2} (converged at 10M/20M), while the GR int p^3/p^2 dp grows quadratically. [E] SUPERFICIAL DEGREE -> -infinity: GR has a fixed degree D=4L+2V-2I per L-loop graph; the entire form factor multiplies the integrand by e^{-(#internal)p^2/M^2}, so the effective degree is -infinity at every loop order L (dressed cutoff-ratio ->1 vs GR ->4). [E] the regulator is the SEAM scale M=M_scal=c3^{7/2}Mbar~3.06e13 GeV (v253) with the seam KMS form factor e^{-u} (v259), a derived scale, not a Pauli-Villars dial. [C]/[O] LOOP UNITARITY is the subtle OPEN point: tree unitarity holds (single positive-residue pole, v386), but unitarity of a nonlocal form factor at loop level (Lorentzian continuation/macro-causality, Pius-Sen/Briscese-Modesto) is genuinely subtle and still debated -- NOT claimed solved.

Recorded status: Perturbative graviton loop UV-finiteness [E] (power counting; super-polynomial falloff, degree -> -infinity at every loop order, seam-regulated) + loop unitarity [C]/[O] (the honest open point, not claimed solved)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: [E] the Euclidean power-counting UV-finiteness at every loop order (super-polynomial falloff; one dressed line turns a quadratic divergence into a finite integral; the superficial degree -> -infinity), regulated by the derived seam scale M_scal (v253/v259); [C]/[O] full loop UNITARITY of the nonlocal form factor (the Lorentzian continuation / macro-causality, the genuinely open point), NOT claimed solved. Extends v386 from tree to loop FINITENESS only; introduces no new number.

Dependencies: v253; v259; v304; v370; v380; v386

Scripts: v389_grav_loop_finiteness.py

Location: tfpt_4_frontier

Original CSV, line 452

Original ledger status

COXETER.PRIME2.01

COXETER.PRIME2.01

The prime-2 facet of the order-30 Coxeter clock, completing v383 (2026-06-24). The clock 30=2*3*5=h(E8) had two named number-field facets (the golden phi in Q(sqrt5), prime-5/carrier; (2/3)^6 in Q, prime-3/family); this names the prime-2 facet and identifies it with structure ALREADY in the theory: the Gaussian field Q(i), i.e. the CM point tau=i and the order-4 mu4=Z/4 square seam deck (v282/v288/v333). [E] THE CLOCK FACTORS INTO THREE PRIMES: h(E8)=30=2*3*5 (exactly three prime factors). [E] ONE QUADRATIC FACET FIELD PER PRIME, EACH RAMIFIED AT ITS PRIME: disc Q(i)=-4 (2 ramifies), disc Q(sqrt-3)=-3 (3 ramifies), disc Q(sqrt5)=5 (5 ramifies); ramified primes {2,3,5}, product 2*3*5=30=h(E8). [E] THE PRIME-2 (GAUSSIAN) FACET = the Z/4 seam deck: min poly of i is x^2+1, tau=i has j(i)=1728=12^3 and is fixed by the modular S of order 4=2^2 (S^2=-I); |mu4|=4=2^2 (v288) -- the static, even, seam-orientation facet (previously unnamed). [E] THE PRIME-5 (GOLDEN) FACET (v383): phi=(1+sqrt5)/2, min poly x^2-x-1, 2cos(pi/5)=phi (pentagon), carrier-5. [E] THE PRIME-3 (FAMILY) FACET (v383/v220): the dynamic rational (2/3)^6 in Q (family-3) with the Eisenstein zeta_3 (j=0, delta_CKM=pi/3, hexagonal CP) the prime-3 CM point. [C] COMPLETION: the three primes of the Coxeter clock now each carry a number-field facet -- Gaussian(2)/Eisenstein(3)/golden(5)=square/hexagon/pentagon=seam/CP/carrier; the prime-2 facet was the previously-unnamed one, and the prime set {2,3,5} is forced by h(E8)=30, not chosen.

Recorded status: Prime-2 facet of the Coxeter clock [E]/[C] (h(E8)=30=2*3*5; one quadratic facet field per prime, ramified at it; the prime-2/Gaussian/Z4-seam facet completes v383's golden and family facets)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: [E] the exact arithmetic (h(E8)=30=2*3*5; discriminants -4,-3,5; ramified-prime set {2,3,5} with product 30; j(i)=1728=12^3; 2cos(pi/5)=phi); [C] the completion/identification reading. A synthesis (like v383); reuses the three smallest CM/real-quadratic fields, tau=i (v282) and the Z/4 deck (v288), introduces no new number.

Dependencies: v220; v282; v288; v314; v333; v383; v387

Scripts: v390_prime2_facet.py

Location: origin_theory

Original CSV, line 453

Original ledger status

FORM.SPECTRALGAP.01

FORM.SPECTRALGAP.01

LEAN 4 FORMALISATION of the SCALAR CORE of the universal spectral-gap principle (door #4, 2026-06-24) -- new module TfptCarrier/SpectralGapAttractor.lean, lake build OK (target TfptCarrier.SpectralGapAttractor; aggregator TfptCarrier rebuilt, 3364 jobs), no sorry, only the three standard kernel axioms. It formalises the meta-theorem of v303/v383/v387 at the one-dimensional reduction: the affine gap contraction iter(r,x*,x0) with multiplier r=lambda_2/lambda_1. [F] iter_sub: the deviation has the closed form iter_n - x* = r^n (x0 - x*) (general n, induction). [F] iter_tendsto: 0<=r<1 (the spectral gap) => iter_n -> x* (the unique attractor), via Mathlib tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_of_lt_one. [F] starts_agree: two starts a,b differ by r^n (a-b) -> 0, so the attractor is INDEPENDENT of the initial state (parameter-freeness). [F] no_gap_no_forget: r=1 (no gap) => iter_n - x* = x0 - x* is CONSTANT (the start is a free parameter) -- the gap r<1 is exactly what removes it. [F] seam_rate_lt_one: (2/3)^6 in [0,1) (prime-3/family facet); golden_rate_lt_one: (5+sqrt5)/8=(phi+2)/4 in [0,1) (prime-5/carrier facet). FINITE-DIM EXTENSION (the multi-dimensional case, reduced to the scalar core): component_tendsto (a non-dominant eigencomponent |r|<1 decays r^n c -> 0); deviation_tendsto (with the dominant eigenvalue normalised to 1, the deviation vector -- all non-dominant components -- tends to 0, so the iterate converges to the dominant eigendirection = the unique attractor, for any start); deviation_unique (two starts give deviation vectors both -> 0 => the selected eigendirection is independent of the start = parameter-freeness); flavor_deviation_tendsto (concrete instance on the cusp-transfer spectrum {1,(2/3)^6,(1/3)^6}, v56/v82/v383). HONEST SCOPE: the scalar reduction PLUS the finite-dimensional diagonalisable case; the general non-diagonalisable / infinite-dimensional Perron-Frobenius statement stays the cited theorem.

Recorded status: Formal [F] (Lean kernel; no extra axioms) -- the scalar core + the finite-dimensional diagonalisable case of the spectral-gap meta-theorem (v383): gap => unique attractor + geometric decay => parameter-free

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: Formal: iter_sub (closed form r^n), iter_tendsto (gap => attractor), starts_agree (parameter-freeness), no_gap_no_forget (gap is essential), seam/golden rates in [0,1); PLUS the finite-dim case (component_tendsto, deviation_tendsto = convergence to the dominant eigendirection, deviation_unique = parameter-free, flavor_deviation_tendsto on {1,(2/3)^6,(1/3)^6}); the general non-diagonalisable / infinite-dim PF stays cited

Dependencies: DYNAMICS.UNIVERSAL.01; CORRECTIONS.GAP.01; FR.DYNAMICS.01

Scripts: lean4-carrier-rigidity (SpectralGapAttractor.lean)

Location: origin_theory

Original CSV, line 454

Original ledger status

ALPHA.QUILLEN.PROGRESS.01

ALPHA.QUILLEN.PROGRESS.01

An HONEST attempt at the external target ALPHA.QUILLEN.EXACT.01 (door #5, 2026-06-24): it REDUCES the open step to a sharper named sub-target via a solvable model, but does NOT close it -- the status of ALPHA.QUILLEN.EXACT.01 stays [O] (external math, type A, v384). [E] SOLVABLE MODEL: det_zeta(-d^2/dtau^2 + m^2) on a circle of circumference beta = (2 sinh(beta m/2))^2 (textbook); its m-variation is the closed form beta*coth(beta m/2) = 2/m + (beta^2/6)m - (beta^4/360)m^3 + ... an exact heat-kernel/Laurent series (the m^3 coefficient -beta^4/360 = -1/360 verified). [E] ZETA-DET VARIATION = HEAT-KERNEL DATA: the variation is governed entirely by closed heat-kernel coefficients, so a zeta-determinant's coupling-variation is STRUCTURED anomaly data, not a free constant -- hence v382's counterterm 8 b1 c3^6 (a Gauss-Bonnet heat-kernel power, c3=1/(8 pi)) is the RIGHT KIND of object. [E] THE v382 SPLIT re-verified at alpha^-1=137.0359992 (8 b1=(4/5)*41 a U(1) index, c3^3/c3^6 heat-kernel powers). [E] THE REDUCTION: the open step now reduces to the named sub-target 'the seam U(1) operator's Seeley-DeWitt coefficient = 8 b1 c3^6 (with a_0,a_1 vanishing on the mu_4 seam moduli)' -- a heat-kernel computation, sharper than 'prove the functional identity'. [O] NOT CLOSED: computing the actual seam-operator zeta-determinant (not the toy) and showing its variation = the cubic is the from-first-principles AQFT/zeta proof (stays [O]); SEAM.EQUIV.01 continuum existence (MMST, v336) likewise stays the other external [O]; the value alpha^-1 stays [E].

Recorded status: Honest attempt / reduction [E]/[O] (a solvable-model zeta-det mechanism + the reduction of ALPHA.QUILLEN.EXACT.01 to the named sub-target 'seam a_2 = 8 b1 c3^6'; the headline target stays OPEN, not closed)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: [E] the solvable model (det_zeta(-d^2+m^2) on a circle and its closed-form heat-kernel variation), the heat-kernel-data mechanism (so 8 b1 c3^6 is the right kind of object), the re-verified v382 split, and the reduction to a named sub-target; [O] the headline ALPHA.QUILLEN.EXACT.01 stays open (NOT closed here) and SEAM.EQUIV.01 continuum existence stays the other external [O]. An honest attempt that reduces, does not close; no new number, alpha^-1 stays [E].

Dependencies: ALPHA.QUILLEN.EXACT.01; SEAM.EQUIV.01; EM.WARD.01; v336; v341; v382

Scripts: v391_alpha_quillen_progress.py

Location: tfpt_1_architecture_e8

Original CSV, line 455

Original ledger status

ALPHA.QUILLEN.PROGRESS.02

ALPHA.QUILLEN.PROGRESS.02

A SECOND HONEST step on the external target ALPHA.QUILLEN.EXACT.01 (2026-06-27, v433): it GROUNDS and CONNECTS, it does NOT close it -- ALPHA.QUILLEN.EXACT.01 stays [O] (external math, type A, v384), alpha^-1 stays [E]. [E] SOLVABLE 4D MODEL REACHES a_4: the flat Delta=-d^2+m^2 on T^4 (vol V) has Tr e^{-tD}=V/(4 pi)^2 t^-2 e^{-t m^2}, Gilkey coeffs a_0=V/(4 pi)^2, a_2=-V m^2/(4 pi)^2, a_4=V m^4/(2(4 pi)^2); the t^0/a_4 conformal-anomaly order is NON-ZERO -- the order v391's 1D circle toy (a_0,a_1 only) could not reach. [E] IT IS THE ORDER v342 USES: v342 grounds the quadratic term in the Gilkey a_4 gauge-curvature coefficient 30/360=1/12 (Omega^2/12, Gilkey Thm 4.8.16); v433 exhibits that a_4 is the operative, computable order -- unifying v391 (a zeta-det variation IS heat-kernel data) with v342 (the seam term IS the Gilkey a_4). [E] MEASURE IS c3-BUILT: (4 pi)^-2=1/(16 pi^2)=(2 c3)^2=4 c3^2 in the seam 2D-boundary normalisation c3=(1/2)(4 pi)^-1. [E] the v382 split re-verified at alpha^-1=137.0359992. [O] NOT CLOSED: the actual seam U(1) zeta-det a_4 coefficient (=8 b1 c3^6) on the mu_4 seam moduli and the origin of the cubic a^3 Maxwell/Chern moment stay open (external math, type A, v384); the exact seam F-normalisation fixing the coefficient VALUE stays [C] (v342); SEAM.EQUIV.01 continuum existence (MMST, v336) stays the other external [O]; alpha^-1 stays [E].

Recorded status: Second honest step / grounding [E]/[O] (a solvable 4D model exhibiting the nonzero a_4 conformal-anomaly order + the v391<->v342 connection; the headline target stays OPEN, not closed)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: [E] the solvable 4D model reaching the nonzero a_4 (t^0) conformal-anomaly order (the order v391's 1D circle could not reach and the very order v342 grounds via Gilkey 30/360=1/12), the v391<->v342 unification (a zeta-det variation IS heat-kernel data AT the a_4 order), the measure identity (4 pi)^-2=4 c3^2, and the re-verified v382 split; [O] the headline ALPHA.QUILLEN.EXACT.01 stays open (the actual seam a_4=8 b1 c3^6 and the cubic a^3 Chern term, v384), and the exact seam F-normalisation fixing the coefficient value stays [C] (v342). A second honest step that grounds/connects, does not close; no new number, alpha^-1 stays [E].

Dependencies: ALPHA.QUILLEN.EXACT.01; ALPHA.QUILLEN.PROGRESS.01; SEAM.EQUIV.01; EM.WARD.01; v336; v341; v342; v382; v391

Scripts: v433_alpha_quillen_heatkernel.py

Location: tfpt_1_architecture_e8

Original CSV, line 456

Original ledger status

ALPHA.QUILLEN.PROGRESS.03

ALPHA.QUILLEN.PROGRESS.03

A THIRD HONEST step on the external target ALPHA.QUILLEN.EXACT.01 (2026-06-28, v434): it settles the status of the three residuals named after v433 and shows they are NOT three independent open problems -- the target stays [O], alpha^-1 stays [E]. [E] b1 IS THE U(1) a_4 HEAT-KERNEL COEFFICIENT (the beta-function = a_4 theorem, Vassilevich): computed from the carrier hypercharge content with the standard spin weights (2/3 per Weyl fermion, 1/3 per complex scalar), sum (2/3)Y_f^2 + (1/3)Y_s^2 = 41/6 (SM normalisation) and (3/5)*that = 41/10 = b1 (GUT) -- so the b1 in the counterterm 8 b1 c3^6 is the a_4 heat-kernel coefficient of the carrier U(1)_Y content (same number as the beta, v159/v246), the SAME KIND of object as the alpha^2 Calderon a_4 (v342), NOT a fitted multiplicity. [E] the geometry factors off: 8 b1 c3^6 = b1*(rank E8)*c3^6 (rank E8=8 the chi=2 seam boundary, v216; c3^6 the six boundary insertions, v342). [C] RESIDUAL (1) 'exact a_4 = 8 b1 c3^6 on the mu_4 seam moduli' == RESIDUAL (3) 'the seam F-normalisation': with b1 and the c3-powers heat-kernel-forced, the only freedom left in the exact a_4 value is how the gauge curvature couples to the boundary measure -- ONE [C] obligation, not two. [E] RESIDUAL (2) located (not closed): a^3 - 2 c3^3 a^2 = a^2 (a - 2 c3^3), with a^2 the Gilkey gauge-curvature (Quillen/Chern) density (v342), so the leading a^3 = a*a^2 is the first MOMENT of the Chern density -- a topological level at boundary order c3^0, not a Seeley-DeWitt curvature integral; its from-first-principles (Chern-Simons-type) origin stays [O]. [E] NET REDUCTION: the EM-Ward residual is ONE [C] (residuals 1&3) + ONE [O] (residual 2), not three independent problems. [O] NOT CLOSED: the alpha^3 Chern level + the from-first-principles proof are external math (type A, v384); the seam F-normalisation stays [C]; SEAM.EQUIV.01 continuum existence (MMST, v336) stays the other external [O]; alpha^-1 stays [E].

Recorded status: Third honest step / grounding+reduction [E]/[C]/[O] (b1 = the U(1) a_4 heat-kernel coefficient via beta=a_4; residuals 1&3 collapse to one seam F-normalisation [C]; residual 2 the alpha^3 Chern level located but [O]; the headline target stays OPEN)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: [E] b1 = 41/6 (SM) = 41/10 (GUT) is the U(1)_Y a_4 heat-kernel coefficient of the carrier content (beta=a_4 theorem), grounding the counterterm's matter factor; the geometry factors as 8 b1 c3^6 = b1*(rank E8)*c3^6; the cubic factors as a^2(a-2c3^3) (a^3 = the first moment of the Chern density, a level). [C] residual (1) 'exact a_4 = 8 b1 c3^6' == residual (3) 'seam F-normalisation' (ONE obligation). [O] residual (2) the alpha^3 Chern level + ALPHA.QUILLEN.EXACT.01 stay open. A third honest step that grounds, reduces (3 residuals -> 1[C]+1[O]) and locates, it does not close; no new number, alpha^-1 stays [E].

Dependencies: ALPHA.QUILLEN.EXACT.01; ALPHA.QUILLEN.PROGRESS.01; ALPHA.QUILLEN.PROGRESS.02; EM.WARD.01; EM.WARD.02; v159; v216; v246; v341; v342; v382; v433

Scripts: v434_alpha_quillen_betafunction.py

Location: tfpt_1_architecture_e8

Original CSV, line 457

Original ledger status

ALPHA.QUILLEN.PROGRESS.04

ALPHA.QUILLEN.PROGRESS.04

A FOURTH HONEST step on the external target ALPHA.QUILLEN.EXACT.01 (2026-06-29, v435): it attacks the SINGLE remaining [O] left after v434 -- residual (2), the cubic alpha^3 Chern/Maxwell moment -- and SHARPENS it with a verifiable test plus a conditional typing, it does NOT close it; the target stays [O], alpha^-1 stays [E]. [E] pi-POWER / METRIC-INDEPENDENCE TEST: the three EM-closure coefficients carry pi-powers exactly {0,3,6} = their c3-orders -- Maxwell k0=1 -> pi^0/c3^0, Calderon -2 c3^3 = -1/(256 pi^3) -> pi^3, transport -8 b1 c3^6 = -41/(327680 pi^6) -> pi^6 -- so the Maxwell a^3 is the UNIQUE pi^0/c3^0 (metric-INDEPENDENT) term. A heat-kernel boundary coefficient ALWAYS carries the (4 pi)^{-d/2} measure (c3=1/(8 pi)); a metric-independent term carries none -- the defining signature of a TOPOLOGICAL term (a Chern-Simons/eta level does not see the metric, a curvature integral does). So the test PARTITIONS the closure into ONE topological level (a^3) + TWO heat-kernel boundary terms, confirming v342/v434's 'a^3 is a level, not a Seeley-DeWitt curvature integral' typing from a TEST rather than a claim. [E] DUAL LADDER: coupling power (3-n) at c3-order 3n for n=0,1,2 (the n=2 transport carries log(1/phi) in place of a^1); a^3 is the n=0 rung -- maximal coupling power, ZERO boundary insertions, the only bulk/topological rung. [C] CONDITIONAL LEVEL QUANTISATION: IF a^3 is the seam U(1) Chern-Simons/eta boundary level (the EM1 reading, v48 -- a [P] input, NOT proven here), large-gauge invariance (Dirac quantisation of the U(1) level on the closed seam 3-boundary) forces the level into Z, and k0=1 is the UNIT (minimal nonzero) level -- a topological integer, NOT a tunable real; this converts 'the coefficient happens to be 1' into 'the coefficient is an integer level and 1 is the unit'. [O] NOT CLOSED: the EM1 lemma itself (the from-first-principles proof that d_tau log Z_Maxwell = a^3 IS the seam U(1) CS/eta level -- the genuine Chern-Simons-boundary computation) stays external math (type A, v384); the seam F-normalisation stays the one [C] (residuals 1&3, v434); SEAM.EQUIV.01 continuum existence (MMST, v336) stays the other external [O]; alpha^-1 = 137.0359992 stays [E].

Recorded status: Fourth honest step / metric-independence test + conditional level typing [E]/[C]/[O] (the pi-power test isolates a^3 as the unique pi^0/c3^0 metric-independent topological rung; conditional on the CS/eta reading the a^3 coefficient is an integer level, =1 the unit; the EM1 CS-boundary proof and the headline target stay OPEN)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: [E] the pi-power/metric-independence test isolates a^3 as the UNIQUE pi^0/c3^0 (metric-independent) term -- the signature of a topological level, NOT a Seeley-DeWitt curvature integral (the other two carry pi^3, pi^6); plus the dual ladder (coupling 3-n at c3-order 3n). [C] conditional on the CS/eta reading (EM1, v48) the a^3 coefficient is an integer level, =1 the unit level, not a free real. [O] the EM1 CS-boundary derivation + ALPHA.QUILLEN.EXACT.01 stay open; seam F-norm stays the one [C] (v434); alpha^-1 stays [E]. A fourth honest step that sharpens the only remaining [O]; no new number, Python-only.

Dependencies: ALPHA.QUILLEN.EXACT.01; ALPHA.QUILLEN.PROGRESS.01; ALPHA.QUILLEN.PROGRESS.02; ALPHA.QUILLEN.PROGRESS.03; EM.WARD.01; EM.WARD.02; v48; v342; v382; v384; v433; v434

Scripts: v435_alpha_quillen_chernlevel.py

Location: tfpt_1_architecture_e8

Original CSV, line 458

Original ledger status

SEAM.S3.SCALINGLIMIT.01

SEAM.S3.SCALINGLIMIT.01

An HONEST attack on the one open lemma of SEAM.EQUIV.01 -- the continuum scaling-limit existence (2026-06-24). It does NOT close v336 (the abstract existence is the cited MMST theorem); it STRENGTHENS the case with the existence-relevant observable v376 did not test: that the finite-size data CONVERGE (a divergent/drifting sequence would have no continuum limit). [E] MULTI-SIZE CONVERGENCE: the Calabrese-Cardy correlation-matrix EE slope c1(L) at L=66,130,258,386,514 is a monotone sequence approaching 1, with |c1(L)-1| strictly decreasing from 4.6e-4 to 7.1e-6. [E] RICHARDSON EXTRAPOLATION: a 1/L fit gives c1(inf)~0.9999, so the 16-Majorana (=8 complex mode) collar has c=8*c1(inf)~7.9993~8=g_car+N_fam -- the (E8)_1/SO(16)_1 continuum value reached IN the limit. [E] CAUCHY SIGNATURE: the successive differences |c1(L_{k+1})-c1(L_k)| are themselves strictly decreasing and tiny -- a numerical Cauchy sequence (necessary, not sufficient, for existence). [O] convergent finite-size DATA are strong evidence but NOT a proof that the continuum limit exists (the cited MMST theorem, v336), and do not pin (E8)_1 over the same-c SO(16)_1 (the holomorphy det K=1 discriminator, v377/v378). Strengthens the residual, does NOT close it -- SEAM.EQUIV.01 stays closed modulo the cited theorem.

Recorded status: Scaling-limit convergence evidence [E] (the finite-size central charge converges to c=8 and Richardson-extrapolates there -- the existence-relevant observable) + the abstract existence stays [O] (cited MMST v336); an honest attack that strengthens, does not close

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: [E] the multi-size convergence (monotone Cauchy-like c1(L)->1) + the Richardson extrapolation to c=8 + the decreasing successive differences (numerical evidence the scaling limit exists and gives c=8); [O] the abstract continuum existence (cited MMST v336) and the (E8)_1-vs-SO(16)_1 holomorphy discriminator (v377/v378) stay open. Extends v376 from the value (two sizes) to the convergence (five sizes); strengthens v336's residual, does not close it.

Dependencies: SEAM.EQUIV.CONTINUUM.01; v336; v367; v368; v376; v377; v378

Scripts: v392_seam_s3_scalinglimit.py

Location: tfpt_research_contracts

Original CSV, line 459

Original ledger status

CORRECTIONS.NUMERIC.01

CORRECTIONS.NUMERIC.01

The typed correction budget (v388) turned into ACTUAL first-correction magnitudes -- a computed theoretical-uncertainty surface (2026-06-24), the short-term testable harvest of v388: instead of merely TYPING each prediction's correction, this gives the NUMBER, so a parameter-free central value can be quoted as 'value +- computed first correction'. [E] FIXED-POINT band: the phi0-derived fixed points (theta12, theta13, lambda_C, beta_rad) carry the EXPLICIT phi0 puncture term as their first correction, dtop/phibase = 36 c3^4/c3 = 9/(128 pi^3) ~ 0.227% (exact, no fit); the SAME number is theta12's epsilon first-correction (eps=(3/4)phi0=c3+36 c3^4). [E] SEAM-GAPPED band: the seam-gapped class (Koide F_pole, recovery) has rate (2/3)^6=64/729 ~ 8.78%; the QG-decoupling bound is CAPPED by the susceptibility excess chi-1 = (2/3)^6/(1-(2/3)^6) = 64/665 ~ 9.62% (finite, v337). [E] EXACT-IDENTITY band = 0 STRUCTURALLY (det R=8, N_Phi=1, theta_eff=0 are exact -- a band would contradict [E]). [E] EXTERNAL-RATE band = external physics, quoted from the modules (m_p/m_e +-7.5% v374; n_s/r N* in [50,60]; eta_B ~1.07x v212; axion scenario), fenced by v187 -- NOT a seam band. [C] the assembled per-class numeric budget gives each prediction a 'central value +- computed first correction'.

Recorded status: Numeric correction budget [E]/[C] (the typed budget v388 as actual first-correction magnitudes: fixed-point 0.227%, seam-gapped 8.78%/QG-capped 9.62%, exact-identity 0, external quoted -- a computed theoretical-uncertainty surface)

Later scope correction: the DtN form estimate alone does not prove the transfer gap.

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: [E] the four computed bands (fixed-point 9/(128 pi^3)~0.227%, seam-gapped (2/3)^6~8.78%, QG cap 64/665~9.62%, exact-identity 0) + the external quoted bands; [C] the assembled numeric budget. A harvest of v388 into testable numbers (theoretical error bars); reuses the phi0 puncture, (2/3)^6 and the chi cap, introduces no new number.

Dependencies: CORRECTIONS.BUDGET.01; v388; v337; v374; v212; v187

Scripts: v393_corrections_numeric.py

Location: origin_theory

Original CSV, line 460

Original ledger status

COXETER.ATOMS.01

COXETER.ATOMS.01

The clockwork coherence (2026-06-24, bird's-eye): the three Coxeter primes ARE the three anchor atoms ARE the three number-field facets, and the prime-2 seam is the common dynamical factor. A re-reading tying v390 (facets) to the anchor a=(1,1,2) and v319 (5x6 clock). [E] ANCHOR ATOMS = COXETER PRIMES: a=(1,1,2) has e3=2=|Z2|, p0=3=N_fam, e2=5=g_car, product 2*3*5=30=h(E8) -- the clock's three primes ARE the anchor's three atoms. [E] ATOMS = FACET FIELDS (v390): 2->Q(i) (disc -4), 3->Q(sqrt-3) (disc -3), 5->Q(sqrt5) (disc 5), each ramified at its prime; {atoms}={primes}={fields}. [E] QG SUSCEPTIBILITY PURE {2,3}: chi=1/(1-(2/3)^6)=729/665=3^6/(3^6-2^6), (2/3)^6=2^6/3^6, exponent 6=2*N_fam. [E] PRIME-2 COMMON DYNAMIC FACTOR: 2/3=|Z2|/N_fam (prime-2/prime-3) and (phi+2)/4=(phi+2)/|mu4| with |mu4|=4=2^2, so both dynamic rates carry prime-2 (the seam involution). [E] 30=5x6=g_car*(2 N_fam) (v319). [C] the prime-2 seam is the universal dynamical engine; prime-3 (family) and prime-5 (carrier golden) the two attractors.

Recorded status: Clockwork coherence [E]/[C] (Coxeter primes = anchor atoms = facet fields; chi=3^6/(3^6-2^6); both dynamic rates carry prime-2; 30=5x6) -- a bird's-eye re-reading, no new number

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: [E] the exact arithmetic (atoms=primes=fields; chi=3^6/(3^6-2^6); 2/3=|Z2|/N_fam; 4=|mu4|=2^2; 30=5x6); [C] the seam-as-universal-dynamic-engine reading. A re-reading of established atoms/eigenvalues (v390/v319), introduces no new number.

Dependencies: v314; v319; v383; v387; v390; v23; v53

Scripts: v394_coxeter_atoms.py

Location: origin_theory

Original CSV, line 461

Original ledger status

HYP.COUPLED.01

HYP.COUPLED.01

HYP.COUPLED.01: finite local carrier/family recursion F(m)=T_net m M^T, checked on all 27 basis inputs; full v486/v487 M has spectrum {1,2/3,1/3}. The joint Perron line is marks tensor e0. One hand is one network step and six family substeps, T_net tensor M^6, not T_micro^6. Exact even/odd conjugacy O^T M^6 O=diag(1,64/729,1/729) supplies the complete v324 readout. v299 growth is unchanged. P2 and phi0 remain inputs. No physical OS-transfer or local charged-field identification is claimed. Correction 2026-10-27: the former routine discarded its network update and its test did not call that routine; the former v327 matrix also erased the odd mode.

Recorded status: Coupled hypergraph rewrite [E]/[O] (one local rule unifies carrier x family; joint attractor marks x e0; recovery (2/3)^6 after one hand; v324 fiber emerges as cusp readout; v299 growth unchanged) -- mechanism unified, phi0 + seed remain

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: [E] finite local recursion on 27 cells, actual-function basis check, joint attractor, full three-mode basis conjugacy, and scheduled 1:6 hand; [O] P2 and phi0 inputs. No physical OS-transfer or charged-field derivation. Existing status retained; executable defect corrected 2026-10-27.

Dependencies: HYP.0D.01; HYP.FIBER.01; HYP.REWRITE.01; HYP.REWRITE.02; HYP.REWRITE.03; v299; v324; v327; v486; v487

Scripts: v395_hypergraph_coupled.py

Location: origin_theory

Original CSV, line 462

Original ledger status

HYP.PHI0.01

HYP.PHI0.01

THE phi0 LEADING TERM FROM ICOSAHEDRAL COMBINATORICS (2026-06-24, sharpening v312/v395): the tree-level retained seed phibase = 1/(6 pi) has a forced combinatorial reading on the icosahedral hypergraph; the puncture 48 c3^4 stays analytic. [E] ICO COUNTS ANCHOR-FORCED: V=12, E=30=h(E8), F=20=g_car(g_car-1), |Aut|=120=4h=|2I| (all from {g_car,N_fam}={5,3}). [E] LEADING TERM EXACT: phibase = 1/(6 pi) = (4/3) c3 = F/(4 h pi) = F/(|Aut| pi) = (F/(g_car N_fam)) c3. [E] F/h = |Z2|/N_fam (hyperedge/Coxeter = v327 survival); phibase = (F/h)/(4 pi) = c3 (g_car-1)/N_fam. [E] GAUSS-BONNET: icosahedron vertex-deficit sum = 4 pi; c3 = 1/(|Z2| 4 pi) same boundary datum (v216/v342). [E] HONEST NEGATIVE: puncture dtop = 48 c3^4 not a rational hypergraph fraction; full phi0 still has analytic piece. [C] phibase is tree-level seed = (hyperedges)/(g_car N_fam) x c3, not an independent rewrite injection; puncture stays [O].

Recorded status: phi0 leading term [E]/[C]/[O] (phibase = F/(g_car N_fam) c3 = 1/(6 pi); F/h = |Z2|/N_fam; Gauss-Bonnet consistent; puncture 48 c3^4 still analytic) -- combinatorial reinterpretation, not full phi0 closure

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: [E] exact combinatorial identities + Gauss-Bonnet + puncture negative; [C] tree-level seed reading; [O] puncture term. Sharpens v312/v395; does not close full phi0.

Dependencies: v312; v216; v342; v327; v395

Scripts: v396_phi0_icosahedral.py

Location: origin_theory

Original CSV, line 463

Original ledger status

HYP.PHI0.PUNCTURE.01

HYP.PHI0.PUNCTURE.01

NAMES THE phi0 PUNCTURE TERM AS A TRACKED [O] HEAT-KERNEL TARGET (2026-06-24, v408): dtop = Omega_adm c3^4 = 48 c3^4 = 3/(256 pi^4) IS the order-4 (|mu4|) local boundary Seeley-DeWitt contact term of the mu4 puncture divisor, summed over Omega_adm = N_fam dim S+ = 48 admissible fermion states -- the analytic complement of the icosahedral tree term phibase (v396, HYP.PHI0.01). Elevates v396's flagged puncture residual to its own citable target WITHOUT a new number (a FACE of the seam boundary analysis, not a new gate). [E] THE SPLIT IS EXACT: phi0 = phibase + dtop = 1/(6 pi) + 48 c3^4 (v396/ARCH.QUAD.01). [E] PUNCTURE COUNT = Omega_adm = N_fam dim S+ = 48, order = |mu4| = 4. [E] CLOSED FORM dtop = 3/(256 pi^4); c3 = 1/(|Z2| 4 pi) Gauss-Bonnet (v216/v342) so c3^4 is a fourth-order boundary heat-kernel power (the right KIND of object, cf. v391). [E] HONEST NEGATIVE: dtop not a rational hypergraph fraction (dtop/phibase < 1%). [O] THE TARGET: the from-first-principles heat-kernel proof that Omega_adm c3^4 IS the order-4 boundary contact term. [C] two engines, two terms: the hypergraph gives phibase, the boundary heat-kernel gives dtop -- a FACE of the seam boundary analysis (the c3 datum), not a second independent gate. No new number (reuses v396/ARCH.QUAD.01, Wolfram-mirrored under ARCH.QUAD.01/v37). UPDATE 2026-07-14 (v483/HYP.PHI0.GEOM.01): the geometric/equivariant side is EXACT (all twisted pillowcase traces t-independent rationals), so the target narrows to the ONE rule 'per-mark insertion weight = c3'; stays [O]. UPDATE 2026-07-14 (v484/SEAM.CONTACT.UNIT.01): the per-mark weight rule MERGES with ALPHA.QUILLEN.EXACT.01 into one analytic step -- the contact unit is the KMS seam unit (v239), derived for the finite cycle sector; the remaining [O] is the diagonal zeta-renormalisation + multiplicity matching (48 = Omega_adm). UPDATE 2026-07-14 (v485): the computable side is COMPLETE (the flat 48-count is the same state set as alpha's Y^2-weighted 41; diagonal zero at the KMS scale); the remaining [O] is the SEAM.EQUIV.01 face alone.

Recorded status: Named target [E]/[O] (the phi0 puncture 48 c3^4 as the order-4 boundary Seeley-DeWitt contact term of the mu4 puncture, summed over Omega_adm=N_fam dim S+=48; a face of the seam boundary analysis, elevates v396's puncture residual to a citable target; no new gate)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: [E] the exact split phi0 = 1/(6 pi) + 48 c3^4, the puncture count Omega_adm=N_fam dim S+=48, the closed form 3/(256 pi^4), the hypergraph negative (reused from v396/ARCH.QUAD.01, machine-checked); [O] the from-first-principles heat-kernel-contact-term proof (the named target); [C] a face of the seam boundary analysis, not a second independent gate. A typing/registration of v396's puncture residual; introduces no new number.

Dependencies: HYP.PHI0.01; ARCH.QUAD.01; v396; v312; v216; v342; v391

Scripts: v408_phi0_puncture_heatkernel.py

Location: origin_theory

Original CSV, line 464

Original ledger status

RES.COXETER.SYMMETRY.01

RES.COXETER.SYMMETRY.01

CLOSED AS A STRUCTURAL LEMMA (2026-06-24, v409): prime-2 (the seam sheet involution) is NECESSARY but NOT autonomous, so no prime-2-only attractor exists -- resolving the v394 open question's falsifiable corollary. The facets are prime-2 (Q(i)/tau=i/Z4 seam deck, static) + prime-3 (Eisenstein zeta3 CP, static; (2/3)^6, dynamic) + prime-5 (golden, static; (phi+2)/4, dynamic). The prime-2 seam appears as the common FACTOR in BOTH dynamic rates (2/3=|Z2|/N_fam; (phi+2)/4=(phi+2)/|mu4|, |mu4|=2^2), NOT as a separate attractor. THE LEMMA (v409): the sheet involution sigma=diag(1,-1,-1) has spectrum {+1,-1} and projector (I+sigma)/2 spectrum {0,1} -- none in the open interval (0,1), so prime-2 supplies parity/projection, never a nonzero contraction rate; the genuine rates 2/3 and (1/3)^6 lie in (0,1) and carry prime-2 only as a FACTOR (2/3=|Z2|/N_fam needs prime-3; (phi+2)/4, |mu4|=2^2, needs the golden phi/prime-5; 30=5x6=g_car*(2 N_fam), carrier static, 2*3 dynamic). [E] So no prime-2-only attractor exists; [C] prime-2 is the universal dynamical parity factor, necessary in every sheet-paired transport, not autonomous -- dynamics begins only after coupling to family-3 or carrier-5 (mu4=2^2 the Galois bridge). This closes the falsifiable corollary and sharpens v383's 'every sector is the same gapped operator' towards 'the same SEAM-driven operator'; the full 'appears in every gap' universality stays the v383 reading.

Recorded status: Structural lemma [E]/[C] (prime-2 necessary, not autonomous: the sheet involution has spectrum {+-1} and projector {0,1}, none in (0,1), so no prime-2-only attractor; reuses established atoms, no new number) -- closes the v394 open-question corollary

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: [E] the sheet involution/projector spectra carry no contraction rate in (0,1), so no prime-2-only attractor exists; [C] prime-2 is the universal dynamical parity factor (necessary, not autonomous), dynamics needs coupling to family-3 or carrier-5. Closes the v394 open question's falsifiable corollary; the full 'appears in every gap' universality stays the v383 reading. No new number.

Dependencies: COXETER.ATOMS.01; v314; v383; v390; v394

Scripts: v394_coxeter_atoms.py, v409_coxeter_prime2_lemma.py

Location: tfpt_research_contracts

Original CSV, line 465

Original ledger status

FORM.COXETER.PRIME2.01

FORM.COXETER.PRIME2.01

LEAN 4 FORMALISATION of the RES.COXETER.SYMMETRY.01 falsifiable corollary (2026-06-24): new module TfptCarrier/CoxeterPrime2.lean machine-proves 'no prime-2-only attractor exists', upgrading the v409 Python check to a Lean theorem. [E] involution_eigenvalue: r*r=1 -> r in {1,-1}; idempotent_eigenvalue: r*r=r -> r in {0,1}; involution_not_contraction / idempotent_not_contraction: neither set meets the open interval (0,1); seam_rate_is_contraction: 2/3 in (0,1); no_prime2_only_attractor: the conjunction (parity + projection carry no contraction rate, while 2/3 does). [E] dynamical reading via the SpectralGapAttractor core: parity_eigenvalue_remembers_start (r=1 keeps the start = no attractor) vs seam_rate_has_attractor (r=2/3 converges to the attractor). Built clean (lake build, 3286 jobs); the new theorems are axiom-pure (#print axioms = propext, Classical.choice, Quot.sound only), and #check (AuditCheck) + signature-lock (AuditContract) pass. Strengthens v409/RES.COXETER.SYMMETRY.01 to the machine-proof tier.

Recorded status: Lean formalisation [E] (no prime-2-only attractor: involution eigenvalues +-1, projector {0,1}, none in (0,1), while 2/3 is a contraction rate; axiom-pure) -- machine-proves the v409 corollary

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: [E] the involution/projector eigenvalue lemmas + the no-contraction-rate corollary + the dynamical reading, machine-proved in TfptCarrier/CoxeterPrime2.lean (axiom-pure: only the three standard kernel axioms). Upgrades v409 to the Lean tier; no new number.

Dependencies: RES.COXETER.SYMMETRY.01; COXETER.ATOMS.01; v394; v409

Scripts: v409_coxeter_prime2_lemma.py

Location: tfpt_research_contracts

Original CSV, line 466

Open questions preserve their achieved subresults

Each research problem has its own scope. A resolved task does not close its whole physical parent. Historical tasks remain explicitly historical in the source record.

Future quotient and positive GNS reconstruction

What is determined by complete future behavior, and what additional positive word-kernel source is needed to reconstruct a cyclic operator realization?

  • Resolved in scope: Future quotient from complete rRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Conditional GNS reconstruction from supplied KRead result
  • open: Select complete K from the original source
Historical: common source, state and event selection

Outside the active mathematical research program since the user's23Oct2026 decision. Historical question: Do the original principles derive a common physical source together with its state, dynamical events, and physically observed fields?

Seam connection and family action

Does the joint discrete theorem determine a concrete connection and a family coupling compatible with the determinant seam action?

  • Resolved in scope: Separate classes from actual transportRead result
  • open: Derive the common connection from the original source
Physical time and complete transfer

Do the original reflection/projector structures determine the full physical time generator and required field transfer?

  • Resolved in scope: Reuse the sign-projector counterexampleRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Reuse conditional full-transfer reconstructionRead result
  • open: Identify the physical complete TFPT transfer
  • Resolved in scope: Reuse complete collar reconstructionRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Classify homogeneous GKLS embedding of the shared register familyRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Decide every homogeneous GKSL logarithm of the fixed M4 channelRead result
Flavor ratio and absolute amplitude scale

Which flavor quantity is fixed on the derived discrete stratum, and which requires the continuous holonomy anchor?

  • Resolved in scope: Reuse the derived flavor ratioRead result
  • open: Determine the absolute holonomy amplitude
Alpha: derived terms, unique root and physical EM identification

Where do the factors and closed alpha equation come from, which provenance steps are proved, and which precise physical EM identification remains open?

  • Resolved in scope: Separate root calculation from source selectionRead result
  • open: Derive the actual EM functional variation and Thomson identification
  • Resolved in scope: Establish the unique global positive rootRead result
Geometric flow and gravity normalization

Do common matter-only observations derive geometric horizon flow and the area response from the original gravity source?

  • Resolved in scope: Record scope of fixed original functionalRead result
  • open: Derive geometric modular response and area coefficient
Clocks and complete neutral source response

Which complete quadratic response can the actual clock images reconstruct?

  • Resolved in scope: Reconstruct all neutral quadratic matrix directionsRead result
  • open: Derive physically admissible probe access
Clock action on charge, time and quarter transition

How does the actual Gaussian J act on the complete marked source?

  • Resolved in scope: Construct original J lift with complete time/charge actionRead result
  • open: Derive physical meaning of the frame orbit
Which responses distinguish charged time action?

Which data separate sources with identical complete neutral vacuum response?

  • Resolved in scope: Determine twist blindness completelyRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Reconstruct twist from charged responsesRead result
  • open: Derive actual charged source probes
Which seam action distinguishes native opposite charges?

Can existing native charge fields produce the quarter-twist time response of the seam?

  • Resolved in scope: Check native fields and response discriminatorRead result
  • open: Derive actual marked seam/state action
Constructive seam search: operators, state and source compatibility

What does the complete phase search decide, and which additional state information prevents a false source solution?

  • Resolved in scope: Finite search closed, actual winding and parity equivalenceRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Positive finite-word state extensionRead result
  • Resolved in scope: E8 current group conditionally determines the P signRead result
  • Resolved in scope: The same shift functional hides distinct ground statesRead result
  • Resolved in scope: No phase hit realizes the unchanged sourceRead result
Which partner actually belongs to the original seam?

Which charge, state type and time action belong to the root partner and original sheet pairing?

  • Resolved in scope: Concrete pair operator; source neutrality is not hypercharge neutralityRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Fixed quarter time splits the color/weak multipletRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Explicit conjugation for the existing sheet pairingRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Actual partner map between quarter domainsRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Bilinear sheet pairing is not Hermitian kernel selectionRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Actual quarter conjugation transports the supplied markingRead result
  • Resolved in scope: No time-stabilizing orthogonal repair of the fixed markingRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Spinor16 is a state sector, not a 16-real one-particle fieldRead result
Automated construction of operator maps and sources

Which tools generate operator maps, learn counterexamples, and can search for the full positive source?

  • Resolved in scope: Calibrate new search without supplying the target mapRead result
  • open: Synthesize a joint field, marking and transfer dictionary
  • open: Search for the positive common source kernel itself
  • Resolved in scope: Automatically construct, certify and distinguish finite kernelsRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Repair search conditions against source types and collar controlsRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Reconstruct multi-field sewing of the canonically identified boundary sourceRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Retain absolute reference amplitude in searchRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Integrate supplied free source including boundary response and scalarRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Convert the full finite CAR kernel into a link functionalRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Close original recursive word reconstruction with memoryRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Retain whole original caller through scale and readoutRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute actual shared Higgs source with full matter words and local RPRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Reduce whole constant original Higgs spectral fiberRead result
  • open: Resolve original geometric Higgs residue sign and field map
  • Resolved in scope: Evaluate local original Higgs heat identification and whole finite consumerRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute whole variable bound Higgs reference and original scale mapRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute whole inner Higgs scale/source and normal kernel transportRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute given whole superconnection and normal spectral readerRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Determine own-admissibility and whole total-chiral spectral readersRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Derive whole scale-energy map,normal profile and relative flowRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute original Green energy producer and mixed scale readoutRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Match current action argument and common Higgs/gravity weightsRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute whole original curvature consumers and Higgs radial sourceRead resultRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute original whole four-ghost source and geometric type testRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute original moving normal kernel derivative and whole source responseRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Decide fixed original O1 source and normal operator placementRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Compare whole Higgs mixture and covariance reader on invariant four-field witnessRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Test exact bounded cutoff on whole ordinary Higgs volumeRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Test whole original circle joint mode and IR Higgs normalizationRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Test original O1 mode covariance against whole Higgs-law classRead result
  • open: Reconstruct original localization from the whole process
  • Resolved in scope: Test bare native-code word compression against actual localityRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Decide original geometric local-time class and execute actual interval readerRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute actual regional two-face partner and supported charged wordRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute original color marginal, modular field law and complete class readerRead resultRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Reconstruct common Higgs law from whole original quarter source towerRead resultRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute original record action on Doily and ordered whole source responseRead resultRead resultRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Locally implement original record process and test unchanged exterior sourceRead resultRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute original elliptic insertion,whole source and causal responseRead resultRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Evaluate actual joint Higgs and color group sourceRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute whole original graph color reader with typed original center selectorRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute original color fixed source and first inherited grading testRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute actual original color-spinor CAR four-word and complete spin-sector sewingRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Decide actual color admissibility of density operations and coordinate regionsRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute actual whole seam-operation class and two-face responseRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute entire original C6 word expansion with source amplitudeRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute original collective Higgs force source and entire mean dualRead resultRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute original all-mode force with actual time and whole sourceRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute original local space/time force source and causal liftRead resultRead result
Origin reverse selection, field dictionary and original P1 kernel

What does reverse selection of P1/P2 give for concrete local fields and multi-field responses, and which identification with the original P1 kernel has actually been proved?

Observable reality: minimal conditions and counterworlds

Which operational conditions are independently required, which inequivalent models satisfy them, and which observable distinctions remain for selection?

Formal carrier core: unbounded Pascal uniqueness and finite glue

Which carrier and glue statements are already present in the papers and Lean sources, and which physical selection does not follow?

  • Resolved in scope: Classify the unbounded Pascal proofRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Classify the formal finite glue scopeRead result
Active mathematical program: marked seam monodromies and lattice lifts

Which marked seam/lattice transport geometries, lift classes and local-coefficient invariants arise from existing clock/reflection/quartic data? First complete case: sign lifts of fourJ representation on CP1 minusμ4.

  • Resolved in scope: Define marked seam category and factor formulaRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Completely classify quarter-clock four-puncture liftsRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Determine central class and all subgroup restrictionsRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Determine full G0 cocycle and classRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Determine native4/5/6local cohomologyRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Classify unrestricted G31 reflection monodromiesRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Determine lift class beyond G0Read result
  • open: Classify additional reflection/clock equivariance and mapping-class quotients
  • Resolved in scope: Equivariant lifting and divisibility by eightRead result
  • Resolved in scope: All62clock obstructions and central transport variantsRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Actual group comparison and central pushout exclusionRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Complete invariants and explicit collisionsRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Compare E6 and E7 slices with the actual quarter clockRead resultRead resultRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Classify original character-valued G31monodromy liftsRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Determine E7-pair action on all original lattice fieldsRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Completely connect E6/E7 cuts to the original compilerRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Compare common covers and actual clock carriersRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Prove shared representation consequence for48,4/3 and5/4Read result
  • Resolved in scope: Completely decide joint compiler-field-cover constructionRead resultRead resultRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Reconstruct canonical local compiler field source from C4Read resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Eliminate redundant sector and multiplicity assumptionsRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Classify native equivariant markingsRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Classify pure quarter clock mapping class quotientRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Determine complete cut algebra and lossless tetrahedron transformRead resultRead resultRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Completely compare scalar glue and actual native compiler classRead resultRead resultRead resultRead result
Common clock sectors, quartic geometry and operational reconstruction

Which previously separate data of the original TFPT core follow from a common clock and representation geometry, and which complete finite measurement classification follows without asserting physical source selection?

Automatic response search with original-source decision

Which additional joint response actually follows from original source equations, and which entire finite process family remains undecided without it?