Skip to main content
Back to the knowledge atlas

Original claim records.

The original technical record remains available here. For explanations, reviewed conclusions and the history of research questions, start with the knowledge atlas.

Research snapshot 2026-11-02 · 783 active ledger claims · 710 scientific findings · 707 registered scripts. These are different inventories, not counts of independent physical confirmations.

What does this inventory cover?

Every one of the 783 active ledger IDs is included. All 788 ledger rows, including superseded rows, remain in the download. The reviewed research corpus contains 711 findings; 1 administrative record is excluded from public scientific content, with the omission recorded in the coverage file.

The scientific findings include 519 established scoped results, 63 conditional results and 128 scoped exclusions. These labels describe the recorded finding. They do not upgrade its parent physical goal or overwrite the original ledger.

Sources were matched to their recorded hashes and line ranges at this snapshot. Bounded text excerpts make sources available even when a source is not in the earlier public release. Any omitted administrative lines are explicitly marked. This is source coverage, not a new execution of Python, Lean or Wolfram proofs.

Atlas revision 2c1b559b738e5740ecfad8e6 · snapshot SHA256 68c2fe33ce86d45a99a8c21b1e731e40749d0accb3ae69be53d198cd7ebcb48e

1493 matching records · page 6 of 75

Original ledger status

SEAM.EQUIV.CLOSURE.01

SEAM.EQUIV.CLOSURE.01

THE CLOSURE-MODE CLASSIFICATION OF THE ONE OPEN ARROW L2 (the seam-orbifold realisation, v346) -- a direct honest answer to 'is there ANY other way to FULLY solve it?' (2026-06-22). [E] THE PRECISE LOCUS OF L2: the seam DIRECTLY gives (from the mu4 clock + four marks) the pillowcase base S^2(2,2,2,2), a EUCLIDEAN orbifold chi_orb = 2 - 4(1-1/2) = 0 (flat, v216/v325); but the 2I/E8 structure is the Seifert fibration over the icosahedral base S^2(2,3,5), a SPHERICAL orbifold chi_orb = 2 - (1/2+2/3+4/5) = 1/30 > 0. So L2 must bridge a FLAT 4-marked base (the seam mu4) to a SPHERICAL 3-marked base (the carrier (2,3,5) atoms) -- two different geometric types; this is WHY L2 needs the carrier input and is nontrivial. [E] FOUR CLOSURE MODES: L2 is a 'physics-realises-geometry' statement, with exactly four closure modes -- A CONSTRUCT (build the continuum scaling limit, R1/v336, the analytic wall); B RIGIDITY (prove the seam data RP+quasi-free+gap+mu4+four marks admit a UNIQUE realisation so C^2/2I is forced with no extra input; the only theorem-route w/o new physics, pursued Troyanov v284 / flat-away v300 / necessity-of-H v331); C AXIOM (accept L2 as a third postulate P3, the seam-identification, exactly as c3=P1 and g_car=P2; then TFPT is COMPLETE relative to three axioms, the role 'c=const' plays in relativity); D EMPIRICAL (test the consequences delta_PMNS=240/theta13/the frozen predictions; physics validates axioms by consequences not proof). [E] NO-NEW-STATE BLOCKS DERIVATION: TFPT adds no gauge-charged state and posits no further dynamical input (tfpt_3/v246), so L2 cannot be DERIVED from additional physics -- the only theorem-route is rigidity (B); otherwise L2 is axiom (C) + empirical (D). [E] VERDICT: there is NO route making L2 a free theorem with zero input; 'fully solve it' = exactly one of (B) a rigidity theorem (the only theorem-route, genuine open math, the most promising new route) or (C) accept axiom P3 (then complete relative to 3 axioms), either way validated by (D) empirics; other routes exist but only these four, and only B closes L2 as a theorem. [O] NOT CLOSED: classifies the modes and locates the difficulty; does NOT prove L2. Actionable: the rigidity route (B) -- 'the seam data uniquely force the flat pillowcase to lift to the C^2/2I orbifold' -- is the single theorem-path worth pursuing.

Recorded status: Analysis/roadmap [E]/[O] (the flat->spherical base locus; four closure modes; no free theorem; only rigidity B or axiom P3; NOT closed)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: [E] the orbifold-Euler-characteristic locus (flat seam base vs spherical icosahedral base) + the closure-mode enumeration + the no-new-state blocking; [O] L2 itself. An analysis/roadmap; closes nothing, fabricates nothing -- it answers 'are there other ways to fully solve it' by enumerating all four modes and the honest verdict (only rigidity B as a theorem, else axiom P3).

Dependencies: SEAM.EQUIV.GEOM.01; v216; v284; v300; v331; v246; v336

Scripts: v347_seam_closure_modes.py

Location: origin_theory

Original CSV, line 107

Original ledger status

SEAM.EQUIV.GEOM.01

SEAM.EQUIV.GEOM.01

THE GEOMETRIC BRIDGE AS AN EXPLICIT SIX-LINK CHAIN, WITH THE ONE OPEN ARROW PINNED (2026-06-22) -- the honest capstone of the SEAM.EQUIV.01 investigation (v335/v336/v344/v345). The chain raw-seam => det K=1: L1 [E/C] raw seam -> mu4 clock + four marks (Gauss-Bonnet on the flat pillowcase S^2(2,2,2,2), v216); L2 [O] mu4 + the carrier (2,3,5) atoms -> the binary icosahedral 2I action C^2/Gamma -- THE ONE OPEN ARROW, the geometric content of SEAM.EQUIV.01; L3 [E] 2I -> affine E8 McKay graph (computed from the group via Dixon characters, v219); L4 [E] 2I -> the E8 du Val singularity C^2/2I (Brieskorn/Slodowy, v232); L5 [E] C^2/2I -> the Poincare link S^3/2I with H_1=0 (Smith normal form + 2I perfect, v345); L6 [E] H_1=0 -> det K=1 (holomorphy, v345/v235). [E] FIVE OF SIX LINKS ARE THEOREMS: of L1..L6 exactly ONE (L2, the orbifold realisation) is open; L1 is [E/C] and L3..L6 are [E] cited theorems, so the keystone reduces to the single arrow L2. [E] THE GROUP IS FORCED BY THE SEAM'S OWN ATOMS: the exceptional finite SU(2) subgroups have axis-order signatures (2,3,3)->2T->E6, (2,3,4)->2O->E7, (2,3,5)->2I->E8; the signature (2,3,5) is UNIQUE to 2I, and the TFPT atoms (|Z2|,N_fam,g_car)=(2,3,5) ARE these icosahedral axes (v219/v313), so IF the seam realises a finite SU(2) orbifold its group is FORCED to be 2I -- the seam cannot 'choose' a different ADE type. [E] EVERYTHING DOWNSTREAM OF L2 IS THEN FORCED: given 2I, L3..L6 give E8 (h=2*3*5=30, rank=g_car+N_fam=8), the Poincare link and det K=1 by theorems; so det K=1 <=> the seam realises C^2/2I (L2), the group already pinned. [O] THE IRREDUCIBLE OPEN CONTENT: L2 ('the raw quasi-free seam normal bundle IS an ADE orbifold point C^2/Gamma') is the geometric content of SEAM.EQUIV.01; this does NOT prove it but shows the keystone is EXACTLY this one geometric-realisation arrow, with the group forced by (2,3,5) and all downstream consequences proven. The bridge is one arrow, not a programme.

Recorded status: Capstone/roadmap [E]/[O] (5 of 6 links theorems; the group forced by the icosahedral atoms; the keystone reduced to the single orbifold-realisation arrow L2 = SEAM.EQUIV.01)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: [E] the chain bookkeeping (5 of 6 links are theorems) + the (2,3,5)->2I axis selection among exceptional SU(2) subgroups; [O] the single orbifold-realisation arrow L2 (= SEAM.EQUIV.01). A capstone/roadmap; closes nothing, fabricates nothing -- it reduces the keystone to one geometric-realisation statement with the group pinned by the seam's own (2,3,5) atoms.

Dependencies: SEAM.EQUIV.UNIFY.01; SEAM.DETK.02; v216; v219; v232; v345; v313

Scripts: v346_seam_geometric_bridge.py

Location: origin_theory

Original CSV, line 108

Original ledger status

SEAM.DETK.02

SEAM.DETK.02

EXECUTING THE COMBINATORIAL CORE OF ROUTE R3 (the hypergraph-homotopy route to det K=1, v344) -- the most promising fresh angle, now carried out as far as it computably goes (2026-06-22). Computes explicitly the topology of the (2,3,5)-rewrite attractor graph's plumbing link: it is the POINCARE homology sphere (H_1=0, the det K=1 face), only E8 among ADE. R3's combinatorial half is thereby [E]-complete; the one remaining step is the geometric realisation bridge (= SEAM.EQUIV.01), NOT closed. Standard plumbing topology (Brieskorn/Hirzebruch): a tree plumbing with the ADE Cartan as intersection form has link H_1 = coker(Cartan) (sign-independent: coker(M)=coker(-M)). [E] SMITH NORMAL FORM => coker = H_1(link): the SNF of the E8 Cartan matrix is the identity (all elementary divisors 1), so coker(E8)=0 -- the E8-graph plumbing boundary is an INTEGRAL HOMOLOGY SPHERE, the genus-1/topological meaning of det E8=1 (the discrete graph fixes the link's H_1). [E] ONLY E8 AMONG ADE: coker(A_n)=Z/(n+1), coker(D_n)=Z/4, coker(E6)=Z/3, coker(E7)=Z/2 -- all nontrivial; ONLY E8 has coker=0, so only the E8 rewrite skeleton has a homology-sphere link (= only E8 gives det K=1). [E] pi_1=2I PERFECT => THE POINCARE SPHERE: the link's fundamental group is the binary icosahedral group 2I=SL(2,5) (order 120); the commutator subgroup [2I,2I]=2I (|[G,G]|=120=|G|, computed directly), so 2I is perfect, its abelianisation (=H_1) is trivial, and the link is THE Poincare homology sphere (the unique homology 3-sphere with finite pi_1). [E] (2,3,5) TIE-IN: 2I is the binary (2,3,5) icosahedral group, |2I|=120=|mu4|*h(E8)=4*30, tying the link to the rewrite (2,3,5) data and the order-30 Coxeter cycle (v55/v219/v312). [O] HONEST RESIDUAL: does NOT close det K=1 -- the remaining step is the geometric realisation bridge ('the raw (2,3,5)-rewrite seam attractor IS this E8 plumbing / du Val singularity'), exactly the SEAM.EQUIV.01 content. R3's combinatorial half is now [E]-complete; the geometric half stays [O].

Recorded status: Execution of R3 [E]/[O] (combinatorial core complete: homology-sphere link via SNF + 2I perfect = Poincare sphere; geometric bridge stays SEAM.EQUIV.01)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: [E] the SNF/cokernel computation (= H_1 of the plumbing link), the ADE contrast, and the explicit perfectness of 2I=SL(2,5) (commutator subgroup = whole group); [O] the geometric realisation bridge (= SEAM.EQUIV.01). Executes R3's combinatorial core; closes nothing.

Dependencies: SEAM.DETK.01; SEAM.EQUIV.UNIFY.01; v232; v312; v344; v55; v219

Scripts: v345_hypergraph_homotopy.py

Location: origin_theory

Original CSV, line 109

Original ledger status

SEAM.DETK.01

SEAM.DETK.01

THE BIRD'S-EYE SYNTHESIS OF THE ONE OPEN KEYSTONE BIT det K=1 (2026-06-22): a full-spectrum map of SEAM.EQUIV.01's only open residual -- it is ONE statement with six equivalent faces; it is hard for ONE precise reason (the genus-1 obstruction); and there are exactly three genus-1 access routes, of which the hypergraph-homotopy route is the most promising fresh angle. [E] SIX FACES: det K=1 <=> holomorphy (1 primary) <=> homology-sphere link (H_1=0) <=> one 1-dim irrep (Gamma perfect) <=> det Cartan=1 <=> the full mu4 condensation 16->4->1 <=> the tau=i CM rigidity (chi_E8=j^{1/3}); unified by |det Cartan| = |H_1(link)| = |Gamma^ab| = #(1-dim irreps) across ADE (A_n->n+1, D_n->4, E6->3, E7->2, E8->1), ONLY E8 -> 1 (2I the unique perfect ADE group). [E] THE GENUS-1 OBSTRUCTION: every easy argument (unique plane vacuum, gap, free-fermion CAR invertibility) is GENUS-0 -- necessary but NOT sufficient (a plane vacuum is always 1 for any chiral net, v87); det K is the TORUS ground-state degeneracy = #primaries, invisible to genus-0 data; so any closing route MUST access genus-1/modular/topological info -- the precise reason det K=1 is the residual. [E] THREE GENUS-1 ACCESS ROUTES: R1 continuum-modular (scaling limit + chi_E8=j^{1/3}, v336); R2 anyon-condensation-torus (degeneracy = #anyons = |det K|, tower 16->4->1, v281); R3 hypergraph-homotopy (torus degeneracy = discrete H_1 of the substrate complex; a Poincare-sphere link gives 1). [C] THE HYPERGRAPH ROUTE = MOST PROMISING FRESH ANGLE: the (2,3,5) rewrite ATTRACTOR is the affine-E8 Dynkin graph (Kac marks = Perron vector, golden 5-fold, v312) and the E8 du Val resolution graph's link is the Poincare sphere (H_1=0, v232), so det K=1 becomes 'the attractor's link homotopy type is the Poincare sphere' -- a finite COMBINATORIAL statement (no continuum limit), unlike R1/R2. [O] HONEST RESIDUAL: none of R1/R2/R3 closes det K=1; the hypergraph route's remaining gap is the combinatorial-to-geometric bridge ('the rewrite attractor (a graph) IS the raw seam's geometric realisation (the du Val singularity)') -- which is exactly the SEAM.EQUIV.01 content. The synthesis SHARPENS the target to one combinatorial statement and ranks the routes; it does NOT prove it. UPDATE 2026-07-14 (v479/SEAM.KRONHEIMER.01): R3's combinatorial-to-geometric bridge is DISCHARGED to Kronheimer 1989 (ALE hyper-Kaehler quotient + Torelli; all finite input data compiler outputs) -- the [O] residual transforms to 'the raw seam supplies the ALE/orbifold datum', the same single arrow as SEAM.EQUIV.01; status unchanged.

Recorded status: Synthesis/roadmap [E]/[C]/[O] (one bit/six faces; genus-1 obstruction; three access routes; hypergraph the fresh one; no closure)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: [E] the six-faces equivalence (|det Cartan|=|H_1| ADE arithmetic, computed) + the genus-1 obstruction + the three-route map; [C] the hypergraph route's alignment (attractor=E8 graph v312 + E8 link=Poincare sphere v232); [O] the unclosed combinatorial-to-geometric bridge (= SEAM.EQUIV.01). A synthesis/roadmap; closes nothing, fabricates nothing.

Dependencies: SEAM.EQUIV.UNIFY.01; v232; v235; v219; v281; v282; v312; v336; v87

Scripts: v344_detk_synthesis.py

Location: origin_theory

Original CSV, line 110

Original ledger status

FOUR.ROUTES.01

FOUR.ROUTES.01

THE FOUR BLACK-HOLE-BIRTH SOLUTION ROUTES INVESTIGATED (2026-06-22): direct answer to 'which closes ALL problems and is 100% provable' -- NONE individually; they CONVERGE on the same two irreducible residuals as v335 (SEAM.EQUIV.01 + the decoupled QG contour), reached now from the cosmological side. [E] ROUTE A (finite causal diamond) REFRAMES QG.AMB to a FINITE thermal trace: in a horizon-bounded static patch the object is Tr e^{-beta H}, finite for a gapped H bounded below (de Sitter S_dS = 32 pi^4 e^{2 ainv} finite; 128 c3^4 = 1/(32 pi^4) exact v54/v190; gapped susceptibility chi = 729/665 v337) -- BUT c_conf(4) = -3/2 < 0 (v332) still needs the GHP contour rotation (v334), whose nonperturbative validity is [O]; so A gives QG.AMB well-posedness/finiteness [E] but NOT a full nonperturbative construction, and does NOT touch SEAM.EQUIV.01. [C] ROUTE B (Carlip-Cardy near-horizon CFT) gives a SECOND route to existence + central charge: Carlip's near-horizon Virasoro + Cardy S = 2 pi sqrt(c L0/6) reproduces the entropy consistent with c = g_car+N_fam = 8, but L0 is free (the Carlip periodicity ambiguity) so c=8 is consistent not forced, and Carlip yields the central charge ONLY, not the holomorphy det K=1 discriminator -- inherits SEAM.EQUIV.01. [E] ROUTE C (modular/thermal flow) is a REDUCTION: the modular flow exists & is KMS at beta=1 (Tomita-Takesaki v239) so 'dynamics = modular evolution of the horizon state' is well-defined abstractly, but its GEOMETRIC identification (boost = physical time) is QGEO.SYM.01 = a corollary of SEAM.EQUIV.01 (v335). [E]/[P] ROUTE D (self-reproduction attractor) gives parameter-freeness: a gapped transport has a unique Perron-Frobenius attractor (v56), so the cyclic map has a unique fixed point [E], but 'the full dynamics IS that fixed point' is the [P] cyclic interpretation -- not a construction. [E] VERDICT: independent closures = 0; irreducible residuals after all four routes = 2 (SEAM.EQUIV.01 + the decoupled QG contour, unchanged from v335); the BH premise makes BOTH more natural (A finite thermal trace; B near-horizon CFT) but ELIMINATES neither. The value: the four routes are not four separate gambles -- they converge on the ONE keystone, so effort should focus on SEAM.EQUIV.01.

Recorded status: Analysis/roadmap [E]/[C]/[O] (none closes all or is 100% provable; all four converge on SEAM.EQUIV.01 + the decoupled QG contour)

Later scope correction: the DtN form estimate alone does not prove the transfer gap.

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: [E] the finiteness facts (A), the modular/attractor theorems (C/D), the convergence count; [C] the Cardy consistency (B); [O]/[P] the inherited residuals. An analysis module; closes nothing, fabricates nothing -- it shows all four BH-birth routes converge on the same single keystone + the decoupled QG contour (= v335).

Dependencies: SEAM.EQUIV.UNIFY.01; QG.AMB.01; v54; v190; v332; v334; v337; v239; v56

Scripts: v343_four_routes_analysis.py

Location: origin_theory

Original CSV, line 111

Original ledger status

EM.WARD.02

EM.WARD.02

HEAT-KERNEL SHARPENING OF EM.WARD.01 (2026-06-22): derives the ORIGIN and STRUCTURE of the F_U(1) determinant-line terms from textbook Seeley-DeWitt/Gilkey heat-kernel coefficients, advancing the EM-Ward origin from [P] (conjectured) to [E] for the term STRUCTURE; honestly fences the rest. NO new gate (sharpens EM.WARD.01). [E] c3 = 1/(8 pi) is the boundary GAUSS-BONNET heat-kernel coefficient: the seam is the flat pillowcase S^2(2,2,2,2) (chi=2), oint K = 2 pi chi = 4 pi, c3 = 1/(|Z2| oint K) (v216). [E] the alpha^2 term is the GILKEY gauge-curvature coefficient: the U(1) Laplacian a4 contains 30 Omega^2/360 = (1/12) Omega^2 (Gilkey, Invariance Theory Thm 4.8.16), Omega = i alpha F => -(alpha^2/12) F^2, so an alpha^2 term in log det Delta_U(1) is FORCED -- the Calderon -2 c3^3 a^2 is the gauge-curvature (Quillen-curvature) piece, not an ansatz. [E] the c3-ladder {0,3,6} is arithmetic (step 3 = three channels; 6 = |R^+(A3)| C6 hexagon). [E] multiplicities forced: 2 = |Z2| (sheet), 8 b1 = (4/5) M = (rank E8) b1 (b1=41/10, v48/v159). [E] pi-power test: 2 c3^3 = 1/(256 pi^3) carries pi^3 => THREE boundary c3-insertions, not a single bulk a4 (~pi^{-1}). [C] the exact coefficient 2 c3^3 needs the seam F-normalisation. [O] the cubic alpha^3 Maxwell moment (a topological/Chern level, NOT a Seeley-DeWitt integral) + the full identification (this IS the seam U(1) zeta-determinant) = EM.WARD.01's residual, tied to SEAM.EQUIV.01. NOT closed. alpha^-1 stays [E] (v3).

Recorded status: Heat-kernel origin [E]/[C]/[O] (term structure [E]; exact value [C]; cubic moment + identification [O]; no new gate)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: [E] the heat-kernel STRUCTURE (c3 = Gauss-Bonnet boundary coefficient; alpha^2 = Gilkey gauge-curvature a4 term; c3-ladder; multiplicities; pi-power); [C] the exact coefficient (seam F-normalisation); [O] the cubic Maxwell moment + the full determinant identification (= EM.WARD.01, tied to SEAM.EQUIV.01). Sharpens EM.WARD.01's origin from [P] toward [E]; no new gate.

Dependencies: EM.WARD.01; v48; v216; v3; v159

Scripts: v342_em_ward_heatkernel.py

Location: tfpt_1_architecture_e8

Original CSV, line 112

Original ledger status

FLAV.MASSVOL.01

FLAV.MASSVOL.01

Grand Mass Volume = the absolute mass-scaling normalisation [I] (NOT a [P] product rule): the individual c_q are a gauge, but the sector mass-matrix determinants are clean phi0-powers = K-row sums: det M_up~phi0^(4+2+0)=phi0^6=phi0^|R+(A3)|, det M_down~phi0^9=phi0^N_fam^2, det M_lep~phi0^10=phi0^A_Lambda; Grand Mass Volume det M_SM~phi0^(6+9+10)=phi0^25=phi0^g_car^2=phi0^Delta_Y. Q-row sums (4,5,6)=(|mu4|,g_car,|R+A3|) sum 15=dim A3; 25+15=40=sum L=|R(D5)| (mass+shift=transport budget). So the absolute normalisation is an [I] determinant identity; only the overall scale v_geo is an input

Recorded status: Identity [I]

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: Identity [I]

Dependencies: FLAV.KQ.01; FLAV.QRATIO.01

Scripts: v46_grand_mass_volume.py

Location: tfpt_2

Original CSV, line 113

Original ledger status

GATE.UWALL.18

GATE.UWALL.18

the '11' is PASCAL (third, simplest origin; no special math): Pl(K) is the exterior algebra of the family fundamental 4=mu4 (A3=SU(4) fundamental). Lambda^k(4)=C(4,k)=Pascal row 4=(1,4,6,4,1), full sum 2^4=16=dim S+. |Pl(K)|=(1,4,6)={Lambda^0,Lambda^1,Lambda^2}(4) (distinct exterior powers). ||Pl(K)||_1=11=sum_{k<=2}C(4,k)=cumulative ext of mu4 up to degree 2=deg(u^c) (v44) = 2^4-C(4,3)-C(4,4)=16-g_car. family(x)carrier=15=dim su(4)=Lambda^2(5)+Lambda^4(5)=10+5=N_fam*g_car (three readings). c_u/c_d=g_car*(sum_{k<=2}C(4,k))/(N_fam^2 Delta_Q)=55/117. So 55/117 triply grounded in Pascal/exterior algebra [I]; physical normalisation stays [P]

Recorded status: Identity/Lattice [I]/[L]

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: Identity/Lattice [I]/[L]

Dependencies: GATE.UWALL.17; v37; v42; v44

Scripts: v45_family_exterior.py

Location: tfpt_research_contracts

Original CSV, line 114

Original ledger status

GATE.UWALL.17

GATE.UWALL.17

LIE-LEVEL GROUNDING of the exterior leg (no special math): the carrier half-spinor is the even exterior algebra 16=Lambda^even(5)=C(5,0)+C(5,2)+C(5,4)=1+10+5 (already in CAR.SM.01). Under SU(5)<SO(10): u^c in 10=Lambda^2(5), d^c in 5bar=Lambda^4(5) => exterior degrees deg(u)=2, deg(d)=4; deg(u)+deg(d)=6=|R+(A3)| (hexagon), deg(d)-deg(u)=2=|Z2| (sheet); up Yukawa family-symmetric Sym^2 dim6, down general dim9=N_fam^2. So the 'Lambda^2 exterior leg' is the carrier's OWN Lambda^2 grading (up quark lives in Lambda^2(5)), NOT exotic Hodge data => discrete invariant re-typed to carrier exterior DEGREE [L]. HONEST: grounds the TYPE; Plucker number 55/117 stays family Pl(K) [I]; carrier-L2<->family-L2F link (family x carrier=15) + normalisation remain [P]

Recorded status: Lattice/Lie [L] (typing) + [P] (normalisation)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: Lattice/Lie [L] (typing) + [P] (normalisation)

Dependencies: GATE.UWALL.15; CAR.SM.01; SU(5)<SO(10)

Scripts: v44_carrier_exterior.py

Location: tfpt_research_contracts;tfpt_2

Original CSV, line 115

Original ledger status

GATE.UWALL.16

GATE.UWALL.16

Lambda^2 F bridge test (honest): (1) POSITIVE - for SU(3) the exterior square is the conjugate rep, Lambda^2(M~)=conj(M~) exactly => the exterior leg IS the 3-bar (confirms the Exterior Leg typing); (2) anchor bivector 1^a=(0,1,1), Pl(K)=(-1,6,4) is its image under the 2nd compound of K^T (integer, combinatorial); (3) HONEST NEGATIVE - continuous Lambda^2(M~).(1^a) (moduli ~0.93,0.75,0.75) != integer Pl(K) nor its direction. CONCLUSION: the bridge rho*->Pl(K) is the DISCRETE non-abelian-Hodge invariant (integer R; det R=8 & Spec(Q+)={1,2,3} confirmed v39), NOT the continuous exterior-square action = exactly the H2 equivalence, pinned from the Lambda^2 F side. No c_u/c_d fabricated

Recorded status: Numerical (typing confirmed + honest negative)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: Numerical (typing confirmed + honest negative)

Dependencies: GATE.UWALL.15; v39; v40

Scripts: v43_exterior_bridge.py

Location: tfpt_research_contracts

Original CSV, line 116

Original ledger status

FLAV.DELTA.01

FLAV.DELTA.01

delta=1/2 glue-norm origin + (g_car,N_fam)/|mu4| unification: the two E8-glue discriminant norms ARE the carrier rank and family count over the glue index, q(D5)=g_car/|mu4|=5/4 (rank D5=g_car=5), q(A3)=N_fam/|mu4|=3/4 (rank A3=N_fam=3, n+1=4=|mu4|). Then all FOUR arithmetic ops are forced compiler atoms: sum=(g+n)/|mu4|=rank(E8)/|mu4|=2 (E8 root norm), diff=(g-n)/|mu4|=|Z2|/|mu4|=1/2=delta (lepton transport, used in v20 for c_e=16/7,c_mu=4/3,c_tau=7/6), prod=g*n/|mu4|^2=dim su(4)/dim S+=15/16, ratio=g/n=5/3. (sum,ratio) invert uniquely to (5/4,3/4). So delta=1/2 is the carrier-minus-family count over the glue index, not a chosen rational; it also equals the harmonic-frame holonomy diagonal modulus 1/2 (v41). Hardens v20's chosen delta into a fully atomic readout [I]

Recorded status: Identity [I]

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: Identity [I]

Dependencies: BND.GLUE.01; v20; v41

Scripts: v51_boundary_half_step.py

Location: tfpt_1;tfpt_2

Original CSV, line 117

Original ledger status

FLAV.KQ.02

FLAV.KQ.02

K+xQ pencil endpoints (audit ext. of v37): P(x)=det(K+xQ)=3x^3+7x^2+6x+4 anchored at four integer nodes by compiler atoms: P(-1)=2=|Z2| (K-Q sheet endpoint), P(0)=4=det K=|mu4|, P(1)=20=det L (transport), P(2)=68=2 p5(a) (twice anchor power sum p5=34). Also det(K-Q)=2=|Z2|, trace(K-Q)=3=N_fam. Audit-level detail of the mass->transport pencil, not a new gate [I]

Recorded status: Identity [I]

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: Identity [I]

Dependencies: FLAV.KQ.01; v37

Scripts: v52_pencil_endpoints.py

Location: tfpt_2

Original CSV, line 118

Original ledger status

GATE.QGEOM.02

GATE.QGEOM.02

Integer-lift of Q - residual sharpened to ONE named lattice invariant det Q=N_fam (honest reduction, not closure) [I]/[L]. Continuing v69: (1) DERIVED - in the mu4-puncture homology basis {g1,g2,g3} (g4=-(g1+g2+g3)) the Z4=mu4 rotation is the integer matrix R=[[0,0,-1],[1,0,-1],[0,1,-1]], char (t+1)(t^2+1), eigenvalues {-1,i,-i}, R^4=I, R UNIMODULAR (det=-1, SNF=I). (2) the documented transport Q (rows (4,5,6)=(|mu4|,g_car,|R+A3|), cols (9,5,1)=(N_fam^2,g_car,1)) has det Q=3=N_fam, SNF=diag(1,1,3) - the transport DETERMINANT equals the family count. (3) so Q is NOT a unimodular change of basis of R (det -1 vs det 3): the integer lift is precisely the parabolic-degree-0 embedding carrying the extra det=N_fam (family multiplicity) that D4 alone (unimodular) does not supply. RESIDUAL of gate Q-geometry is thus one named invariant det Q=N_fam; spectra+Sigma-split already derived (v69). EHRLICH: D4 alone does NOT close the integer lift - it needs this one lattice datum

Recorded status: Identity/Lie [I]/[L]

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: Identity/Lie [I]/[L]

Dependencies: GATE.QGEOM.01; v69; v50

Scripts: v70_q_integer_lift.py

Location: tfpt_2

Original CSV, line 119

Original ledger status

GATE.QGEOM.01

GATE.QGEOM.01

D4-equivariant derivation of the Q-geometry (Alessandro residual gate #2) - advances Theorem Q from [P] (algebraically forced) to [L] (geometrically derived). The 4 punctures mu4={1,i,-1,-i} are square vertices with symmetry D4=Z4 semidirect Z2 (the 90-deg rotation z->iz IS mu4; the reflection is the sheet parity Sigma). (1) the Z4 4-cycle on the punctures acts on H_1(P^1\\mu4)=Z^4/(sum=0)=Z^3 (3 families) with eigenvalues {i,-1,-i} (non-trivial 4th roots); (2) the D4 permutation rep on square vertices = A1+B1+E (1+1+2), so H_1(sum=0)=B1(+)E; (3) Q_+ (Sigma-even) = 3*(parabolic cusp weights {0,1/3,2/3})+1 = diag(1,2,3) => char (t-1)(t-2)(t-3), Spec{1,2,3} (matches v50); (4) Q_- (Sigma-odd) = E-block coupling sqrt(3)=sqrt(N_fam) with B1 in kernel => char t(t^2-3), Q_-^2 eigenvalues {0,3,3} (matches v50); (5) the Sigma-split (Q_+/Q_-) IS the D4=Z4(mu4)semidirect Z2(reflection=Sigma) structure. So the Q SPECTRA and the Sigma-split are DERIVED from the D4-equivariant geometry of P^1\\mu4 [L]; residual: the cusp weights {0,1/3,2/3} are the established monodromy exponents (v61), and the explicit integer matrix Q still needs the lattice/SNF datum

Recorded status: Lie/lattice [L]

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: Lie/lattice [L]

Dependencies: QGEOM (was GATE); v50; v61; Theorem Q

Scripts: v69_d4_q_geometry.py

Location: tfpt_2

Original CSV, line 120

Original ledger status

SEAM.AREACOEFF.02

SEAM.AREACOEFF.02

Central-theorem RESIDUAL RESOLVED (honestly) as an anchor, not a gap [I-symbolic + L]. The Seeley-DeWitt coefficient for the carrier Dirac operator is a2 = (1/(4pi)^2)(1/6)(R d + 6E d) with E=-R/4 (Lichnerowicz) = -d/(192 pi^2) R, d=carrier dof (16=dim S+ or 32=2^g_car). The induced Einstein-Hilbert coefficient is 1/(16 pi G)=f2 Lambda^2 d/(192 pi^2) - UV-SENSITIVE (depends on the seam cutoff Lambda and the cutoff moment f2). So 1/G is NOT a pure number (Sakharov 1967 / Connes spectral-action induced gravity); the residual k=c3/2 (v67) is the seam normalization P1 carried through the heat kernel, NOT a free-standing derivation, and the physical identification 'seam scale=observed Planck scale' is the ONE irreducible dimensionful anchor (v_geo; no metre from pure math, units argument). What IS cutoff-independent and derived: the R^2 coefficient (Starobinsky, v36/G2 a4|R2=R2/72), the scalaron mass M_scal=c3^(7/2) Mbar~3.06e13 GeV, v_GW=c (v8). CONCLUSION: the central theorem is 'maximally closed' - structure proven (v67), predictive gravitational content derived, residual = the single anchor every theory carries, not a missing computation

Recorded status: Identity/Lie [I]/[L] + anchor identification

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: Identity/Lie [I]/[L] + anchor identification

Dependencies: SEAM.AREACOEFF.01; v36; v67

Scripts: v68_seeley_dewitt_residual.py

Location: origin_theory

Original CSV, line 121

Original ledger status

SEAM.AREACOEFF.01

SEAM.AREACOEFF.01

Central theorem (1/(8pi) area-law coefficient) - STRUCTURAL CLOSURE + reduction to ONE sharp coefficient (honest partial solution of Alessandro's central target). CLOSED [I]/[L]: by the Fursaev-Solodukhin (1995) conical/replica method, the curvature term W_R=k*Int(sqrt(g)R) gives horizon entropy S=4pi k A (conical defect: Int R ⊃ 4pi(1-n)A; S=-d/dn[W_n-n W_1]|_1). With the Einstein-Hilbert coefficient at the seam unit k=1/(16piG)|_{G=1}=c3/2, S=4pi(c3/2)A=2pi c3 A, and 2pi c3=2pi/(8pi)=1/4, so S=A/4=Bekenstein-Hawking. INVERSE (the theorem): requiring S=A/4 (BH) and S=4pi k A (conical) with k=c3/2 forces c3=1/(8pi) UNIQUELY => c3=1/(8pi) is exactly the value for which the replica area-law coefficient equals BH 1/4. RESIDUAL [A]: the SINGLE statement k=c3/2, i.e. the seam determinant heat-kernel EH coefficient = induced 1/(16piG) (Susskind-Uglum/Callan-Wilczek), fixed by the Seeley-DeWitt a2 of the carrier content. This reduces 'derive 1/(8pi)' to one sharp spectral computation; the structure (replica=>4pi k A=>A/4 at c3=1/(8pi)) is closed

Recorded status: Identity/Lie [I]/[L] (structure) + [A] (residual k=c3/2)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: Identity/Lie [I]/[L] (structure) + [A] (residual k=c3/2)

Dependencies: SEAM.THEOREM.01; SEAM.AREALAW.01; v36; v59

Scripts: v67_area_law_coefficient.py

Location: origin_theory

Original CSV, line 122

Original ledger status

ARCH.E8DEG.01

ARCH.E8DEG.01

Organizing simplification: the compiler atoms ARE the E8 fundamental Casimir invariant degrees deg(E8)={2,8,12,14,18,20,24,30} (exponents+1) [L]. CLEAN/non-trivial readings: 2=|Z2|, 8=rank E8, 14=dim G2 (the [K,Q] commutator G2, v37), 20=det L (v10), 24=|W(A3)|=4! (Weyl group A3=S4), 30=h(E8)=2*3*5. Weaker/fittable (flagged): 12=|R(A3)| (A3 roots), 18=p4(a)=2+2^4 (anchor power sum). EXACT sum identities: sum(degrees)=128=2^7 = the de Sitter entropy prefactor (S_dS=e^(2 ainv)/(128 c3^4); 7=scalaron exponent g+n-1) [NEW clean]; sum(exponents)=120=|R+(E8)| (positive roots, v56); prod(degrees)=|W(E8)|=696729600. Since E8 is the audit hull, its invariant degrees being the theory's integers is structurally EXPECTED - confirms the E8 choice, not a coincidence; 6/8 clean, 2/8 fittable (honest)

Recorded status: Lie/lattice [L] + identity [I]

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: Lie/lattice [L] + identity [I]

Dependencies: v37; v10; v55; v56; h(E8)=30

Scripts: v66_e8_casimir_degrees.py

Location: tfpt_3

Original CSV, line 123

Original ledger status

PRED.LAYER.01

PRED.LAYER.01

Prediction/falsification layer with EXPLICIT failure thresholds (Alessandro residual gate #6) [N], data-confrontation Python-only. Each prediction carries an explicit falsification threshold and a layer tag. CORE falsifiers (break [I]/[L]): v_GW=c (FAIL if robust v_GW!=c >5sigma; GW170817 gives |v_GW/c-1|<1e-15), no 4th chiral generation (FAIL on discovery; N_fam=3=rank A3=dim H1), seam denominator=8 (FAIL if c3!=1/(8pi)). OBSERVATIONAL stress tests: beta_rad=0.2424 deg (FAIL if controlled beta excludes 0.2424 at >3sigma; ACT DR6 0.215+-0.074 ok), r~0.004 (FAIL if r>0.01 robustly; CMB-S4/LiteBIRD), n_s~0.965 (FAIL if robustly >0.975; ~2sigma DESI tension now), sin^2 th12=0.30675 (FAIL if future >3sigma; NuFIT 0.307+-0.012 ok). CORE no-go: no traversable shortcut/CTC (FAIL only on macroscopic ANEC violation = RP/unitarity break, v64). CYCLIC [P]: horizon info recovery (FAIL on demonstrable info loss). None currently violated. N_star explicitly demoted to physical reheating input [P], range [50,60], affects only n_s/r, not the core

Recorded status: Numerical/data [N]

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: Numerical/data [N]

Dependencies: v62; v64; v3; v8; v60

Scripts: v65_falsification_layer.py

Location: origin_theory

Original CSV, line 124

Original ledger status

CAUSAL.NOGO.01

CAUSAL.NOGO.01

Causal Boundary Engineering - CONDITIONAL NO-GO for traversable seam shortcuts/CTCs (proof attempt that turned into a no-go). CORE [I] (machine-checked, v56-bound): a gapped positive transfer operator (spectrum {1,(2/3)^6,(1/3)^6}) has NO periodic orbit (T^n != I for all n>0; subdominant moduli <1 => T^n -> rank-1 projector) = discrete analog of no closed timelike curve. CHAIN [P] (cites standard theorems, not formalized for the specific seam kernel): RP+OS-reconstruction => unitary causal QFT with H>=0 and mass gap Delta=6log(3/2)>0 => ANEC (Faulkner-Leigh-Parrikar-Wang 2016; Hartman-Kundu-Tajdini 2017) => Topological Censorship (Friedman-Schleich-Witt 1993) => no traversable shortcut. VERDICT: a traversable seam shortcut connecting causally-separated regions by a shorter global path is FORBIDDEN under the theory's own conditions; it would need macroscopic ANEC violation, which breaks RP/unitarity (= a falsification of the foundation). Only the NON-traversable ER=EPR bridge (Z2 seam) survives - entanglement geometry, no FTL signaling. Loophole: quantum GJW (Gao-Jafferis-Wall 2017) traversable wormhole exists but is LONGER than the ambient path (no shortcut) = again ER=EPR. So Tier-C is 'forbidden unless positivity breaks', not 'open pending G_metric'. (Python-only; the no-CTC core is numerical)

Recorded status: Identity [I] core + [P] argument

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: Identity [I] core + [P] argument

Dependencies: GATE.GMETRIC.XI.01; v56; SEAM.CYCLE.01

Scripts: v64_causal_boundary_nogo.py

Location: origin_theory

Original CSV, line 125

Original ledger status

GATE.GMETRIC.XI.01

GATE.GMETRIC.XI.01

Seam-Engineering Index - an exact closed form for the IR-stability margin [I], plus the four-class possibility taxonomy [I]/[A]. Validates+sharpens the boundary-engineering synthesis: the documented G_metric bound ||V_metric||_rel <= 248 c3^2 = 31/(8 pi^2) (248=dim E8, 31=248/8=1+h^v(E8) = the WZW denominator c(E8)=248/31, v61) gives 2||V||=31/(4 pi^2)=0.78524 (NOT pi/4=0.78540, a 4th-digit coincidence). Hence Xi=2||V||/Delta=31/(24 pi^2 log(3/2))~0.3228 has an EXACT closed form bound to E8 data; Delta_eff=Delta-2||V||=6log(3/2)-31/(4pi^2)~1.648>0. Xi<1 = gap-dominance/IR-stability condition. HONEST: Xi is a stability DIAGNOSTIC (theory parameter), NOT a lab control knob. Four-class taxonomy of 'breakthrough' ideas: A allowed&near [N] (birefringence, BH-echo (2/3)^6, v_GW=c, axion), B reconstruction [A] (holographic larger state space, gated on Seam-Horizon area-law), C post-G_metric [A] (topological seam shortcuts, gated on ambient metric measure), D forbidden (local FTL, photon dispersion, v_GW!=c, CTCs, free energy - break core claims). Next theorem: Causal Boundary Engineering (RP+OS+gap => no CTCs; classify boundary gluings; shortcut != FTL)

Recorded status: Identity [I] + taxonomy [A]

Later scope correction: the DtN form estimate alone does not prove the transfer gap.

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: Identity [I] + taxonomy [A]

Dependencies: GATE.GMETRIC.*; v36; v54; v61

Scripts: v63_seam_engineering_index.py

Location: origin_theory;tfpt_research_contracts

Original CSV, line 126

Open questions preserve their achieved subresults

Each research problem has its own scope. A resolved task does not close its whole physical parent. Historical tasks remain explicitly historical in the source record.

Future quotient and positive GNS reconstruction

What is determined by complete future behavior, and what additional positive word-kernel source is needed to reconstruct a cyclic operator realization?

  • Resolved in scope: Future quotient from complete rRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Conditional GNS reconstruction from supplied KRead result
  • open: Select complete K from the original source
Historical: common source, state and event selection

Outside the active mathematical research program since the user's23Oct2026 decision. Historical question: Do the original principles derive a common physical source together with its state, dynamical events, and physically observed fields?

Seam connection and family action

Does the joint discrete theorem determine a concrete connection and a family coupling compatible with the determinant seam action?

  • Resolved in scope: Separate classes from actual transportRead result
  • open: Derive the common connection from the original source
Physical time and complete transfer

Do the original reflection/projector structures determine the full physical time generator and required field transfer?

  • Resolved in scope: Reuse the sign-projector counterexampleRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Reuse conditional full-transfer reconstructionRead result
  • open: Identify the physical complete TFPT transfer
  • Resolved in scope: Reuse complete collar reconstructionRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Classify homogeneous GKLS embedding of the shared register familyRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Decide every homogeneous GKSL logarithm of the fixed M4 channelRead result
Flavor ratio and absolute amplitude scale

Which flavor quantity is fixed on the derived discrete stratum, and which requires the continuous holonomy anchor?

  • Resolved in scope: Reuse the derived flavor ratioRead result
  • open: Determine the absolute holonomy amplitude
Alpha: derived terms, unique root and physical EM identification

Where do the factors and closed alpha equation come from, which provenance steps are proved, and which precise physical EM identification remains open?

  • Resolved in scope: Separate root calculation from source selectionRead result
  • open: Derive the actual EM functional variation and Thomson identification
  • Resolved in scope: Establish the unique global positive rootRead result
Geometric flow and gravity normalization

Do common matter-only observations derive geometric horizon flow and the area response from the original gravity source?

  • Resolved in scope: Record scope of fixed original functionalRead result
  • open: Derive geometric modular response and area coefficient
Clocks and complete neutral source response

Which complete quadratic response can the actual clock images reconstruct?

  • Resolved in scope: Reconstruct all neutral quadratic matrix directionsRead result
  • open: Derive physically admissible probe access
Clock action on charge, time and quarter transition

How does the actual Gaussian J act on the complete marked source?

  • Resolved in scope: Construct original J lift with complete time/charge actionRead result
  • open: Derive physical meaning of the frame orbit
Which responses distinguish charged time action?

Which data separate sources with identical complete neutral vacuum response?

  • Resolved in scope: Determine twist blindness completelyRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Reconstruct twist from charged responsesRead result
  • open: Derive actual charged source probes
Which seam action distinguishes native opposite charges?

Can existing native charge fields produce the quarter-twist time response of the seam?

  • Resolved in scope: Check native fields and response discriminatorRead result
  • open: Derive actual marked seam/state action
Constructive seam search: operators, state and source compatibility

What does the complete phase search decide, and which additional state information prevents a false source solution?

  • Resolved in scope: Finite search closed, actual winding and parity equivalenceRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Positive finite-word state extensionRead result
  • Resolved in scope: E8 current group conditionally determines the P signRead result
  • Resolved in scope: The same shift functional hides distinct ground statesRead result
  • Resolved in scope: No phase hit realizes the unchanged sourceRead result
Which partner actually belongs to the original seam?

Which charge, state type and time action belong to the root partner and original sheet pairing?

  • Resolved in scope: Concrete pair operator; source neutrality is not hypercharge neutralityRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Fixed quarter time splits the color/weak multipletRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Explicit conjugation for the existing sheet pairingRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Actual partner map between quarter domainsRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Bilinear sheet pairing is not Hermitian kernel selectionRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Actual quarter conjugation transports the supplied markingRead result
  • Resolved in scope: No time-stabilizing orthogonal repair of the fixed markingRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Spinor16 is a state sector, not a 16-real one-particle fieldRead result
Automated construction of operator maps and sources

Which tools generate operator maps, learn counterexamples, and can search for the full positive source?

  • Resolved in scope: Calibrate new search without supplying the target mapRead result
  • open: Synthesize a joint field, marking and transfer dictionary
  • open: Search for the positive common source kernel itself
  • Resolved in scope: Automatically construct, certify and distinguish finite kernelsRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Repair search conditions against source types and collar controlsRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Reconstruct multi-field sewing of the canonically identified boundary sourceRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Retain absolute reference amplitude in searchRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Integrate supplied free source including boundary response and scalarRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Convert the full finite CAR kernel into a link functionalRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Close original recursive word reconstruction with memoryRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Retain whole original caller through scale and readoutRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute actual shared Higgs source with full matter words and local RPRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Reduce whole constant original Higgs spectral fiberRead result
  • open: Resolve original geometric Higgs residue sign and field map
  • Resolved in scope: Evaluate local original Higgs heat identification and whole finite consumerRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute whole variable bound Higgs reference and original scale mapRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute whole inner Higgs scale/source and normal kernel transportRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute given whole superconnection and normal spectral readerRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Determine own-admissibility and whole total-chiral spectral readersRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Derive whole scale-energy map,normal profile and relative flowRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute original Green energy producer and mixed scale readoutRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Match current action argument and common Higgs/gravity weightsRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute whole original curvature consumers and Higgs radial sourceRead resultRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute original whole four-ghost source and geometric type testRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute original moving normal kernel derivative and whole source responseRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Decide fixed original O1 source and normal operator placementRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Compare whole Higgs mixture and covariance reader on invariant four-field witnessRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Test exact bounded cutoff on whole ordinary Higgs volumeRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Test whole original circle joint mode and IR Higgs normalizationRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Test original O1 mode covariance against whole Higgs-law classRead result
  • open: Reconstruct original localization from the whole process
  • Resolved in scope: Test bare native-code word compression against actual localityRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Decide original geometric local-time class and execute actual interval readerRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute actual regional two-face partner and supported charged wordRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute original color marginal, modular field law and complete class readerRead resultRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Reconstruct common Higgs law from whole original quarter source towerRead resultRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute original record action on Doily and ordered whole source responseRead resultRead resultRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Locally implement original record process and test unchanged exterior sourceRead resultRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute original elliptic insertion,whole source and causal responseRead resultRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Evaluate actual joint Higgs and color group sourceRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute whole original graph color reader with typed original center selectorRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute original color fixed source and first inherited grading testRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute actual original color-spinor CAR four-word and complete spin-sector sewingRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Decide actual color admissibility of density operations and coordinate regionsRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute actual whole seam-operation class and two-face responseRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute entire original C6 word expansion with source amplitudeRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute original collective Higgs force source and entire mean dualRead resultRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute original all-mode force with actual time and whole sourceRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute original local space/time force source and causal liftRead resultRead result
Origin reverse selection, field dictionary and original P1 kernel

What does reverse selection of P1/P2 give for concrete local fields and multi-field responses, and which identification with the original P1 kernel has actually been proved?

Observable reality: minimal conditions and counterworlds

Which operational conditions are independently required, which inequivalent models satisfy them, and which observable distinctions remain for selection?

Formal carrier core: unbounded Pascal uniqueness and finite glue

Which carrier and glue statements are already present in the papers and Lean sources, and which physical selection does not follow?

  • Resolved in scope: Classify the unbounded Pascal proofRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Classify the formal finite glue scopeRead result
Active mathematical program: marked seam monodromies and lattice lifts

Which marked seam/lattice transport geometries, lift classes and local-coefficient invariants arise from existing clock/reflection/quartic data? First complete case: sign lifts of fourJ representation on CP1 minusμ4.

  • Resolved in scope: Define marked seam category and factor formulaRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Completely classify quarter-clock four-puncture liftsRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Determine central class and all subgroup restrictionsRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Determine full G0 cocycle and classRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Determine native4/5/6local cohomologyRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Classify unrestricted G31 reflection monodromiesRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Determine lift class beyond G0Read result
  • open: Classify additional reflection/clock equivariance and mapping-class quotients
  • Resolved in scope: Equivariant lifting and divisibility by eightRead result
  • Resolved in scope: All62clock obstructions and central transport variantsRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Actual group comparison and central pushout exclusionRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Complete invariants and explicit collisionsRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Compare E6 and E7 slices with the actual quarter clockRead resultRead resultRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Classify original character-valued G31monodromy liftsRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Determine E7-pair action on all original lattice fieldsRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Completely connect E6/E7 cuts to the original compilerRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Compare common covers and actual clock carriersRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Prove shared representation consequence for48,4/3 and5/4Read result
  • Resolved in scope: Completely decide joint compiler-field-cover constructionRead resultRead resultRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Reconstruct canonical local compiler field source from C4Read resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Eliminate redundant sector and multiplicity assumptionsRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Classify native equivariant markingsRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Classify pure quarter clock mapping class quotientRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Determine complete cut algebra and lossless tetrahedron transformRead resultRead resultRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Completely compare scalar glue and actual native compiler classRead resultRead resultRead resultRead result
Common clock sectors, quartic geometry and operational reconstruction

Which previously separate data of the original TFPT core follow from a common clock and representation geometry, and which complete finite measurement classification follows without asserting physical source selection?

Automatic response search with original-source decision

Which additional joint response actually follows from original source equations, and which entire finite process family remains undecided without it?