Established in scope
Complete answers determine the minimal process quotient
In the question: Future quotient and positive GNS reconstruction
Applies exactly relative to the declared experiment alphabet and complete answer functional; no absolute ontology or physical TFPT source claim.
Read the exact result, assumptions and evidence
Result
For a fixed experiment alphabet and complete answer functional r, u~v exactly when r(uw)=r(vw) for every allowed continuation w. The quotient is the minimal distinguishable process state relative to those answers; by itself it yields neither complex amplitudes, the Born rule, continuous time, a metric, nor E8.
Required assumptions
- Declared complete answer functional
A fixed set of allowed experiments and the answer functional r for every finite experiment sequence are additional operational inputs; they define the future quotient only relative to that experiment alphabet.
Original evidence
- RESULTS.md lines 109–144
Source checked at this snapshot
Original location and fingerprint
experiments/theory-contracts/universalraum-primitive-source-audit-20260915/RESULTS.md
ae9880339326e402dee9783185defc0671bdec430a777d961d54e7636335aa80
finding:future-equivalence-minimizes-declared-answer-process