Skip to main content

Read the result in its research context.

Follow the published construction into its registered claims, then explore reviewed research questions, attempts and the connections that remain open.

Established in scope

Decoder and same native clock polynomial act differently

In the question: Historical: common source, state and event selection

This excludes exactly the stated native polynomial continuation with the fixed decoder P220, not every coherent common-clock lift. The logical decoder does not prove original physical permission for the collective intervention.

Read the exact result, assumptions and evidence

Result

The existing three-register decoder derives encoded R5 tensor I4. Substituting actual sigma20 and all four native tau20 into the same R polynomial with original decoder marking gives unitarity and the correct square but fails common erasure action. The pure input rho=(I-F_sigma5)(I+s23)/2 yields output-difference eigenvalues +1/4,+1/4,-1/4,-1/4 and16 zeros: trace distance1/2 for all four lifts.

Required assumptions

  • Actual native G31 event representation

    Use the actual original Hamming/E8/J matrices and60 reflections, their four-dimensional action, characteristic P64=O2(G31), and existing S6 quotient. These are accepted mathematical core data, not a physical source derived from P1 in this round.

  • Symmetric quartic and actual erasure intertwiner

    Use Sym^4 of the native four-representation, the actual five codeword sums, and the existing one-register erasure intertwiner. The symmetric tensor rule and its physical selection are not silently inferred from the full tensor product.

  • Original simplex and positive polar rule

    Use the actual W6 simplex and raw metric, unchanged native three-clock and original positive polar prescription at one of its three marked fixed points. The prescription and its physical selection are not derived from P1.

  • Original decoder and same native quarter polynomial

    Fix original erasure decoder D(A)=W(A tensor I4)W* and its mark P220=P2 tensor I4. Substitute actual sigma20=sigma5 tensor bar(sigma4) and all four native reflection lifts of original tau5 into the existing R polynomial. This tests that continuation, not all coherent lifts.

Original evidence

  • MARKED-CLOCK-LIFT.md lines 123–160

    Source checked at this snapshot

    Original location and fingerprint

    experiments/theory-contracts/joint-native-algebra-selection-20261016/MARKED-CLOCK-LIFT.md

    da0d56aeb94f078f496a0748911ad559fa5835d77757fc7d1879c2eb70123468

finding:original-decoder-versus-native-quarter-polynomial-erasure-test