Skip to main content

Results, with their exact scope.

The complete active claim ledger and the eligible source reviewed research findings, including conditional achievements and precise negative results. The original statement, premises and status remain attached.

Research snapshot 2026-11-02 · 783 active ledger claims · 696 scientific findings · 707 registered scripts. These are different inventories, not counts of independent physical confirmations.

What does this inventory cover?

Every one of the 783 active ledger IDs is included. All 788 ledger rows, including superseded rows, remain in the download. The reviewed research corpus contains 697 findings; 1 administrative record is excluded from public scientific content, with the omission recorded in the coverage file.

The scientific findings include 505 established scoped results, 63 conditional results and 128 scoped exclusions. These labels describe the recorded finding. They do not upgrade its parent physical goal or overwrite the original ledger.

Sources were matched to their recorded hashes and line ranges at this snapshot. Bounded text excerpts make sources available even when a source is not in the earlier public release. Any omitted administrative lines are explicitly marked. This is source coverage, not a new execution of Python, Lean or Wolfram proofs.

Atlas revision 3ddcc9643e499ce39900d9c5 · snapshot SHA256 7622b36de7ed79901ae75361b009fa423a6505076f388f4fbaf2d42e1ba7dcf5

230 matching records · page 1 of 12

Original ledger status

EM.FP.01

EM.FP.01

alpha^-1 = 137.0359992168 unique root of F_U1=0 (existence + uniqueness + interval-arithmetic + ablation)

Recorded status: Numerical

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: Numerical

Dependencies: AX.P1.01; EM.BUDGET.01

Scripts: v3_em_alpha.py

Location: tfpt_1

Original CSV, line 11

Original ledger status

SM.RG.01

SM.RG.01

dimensionful EW/QCD masses (m_W; m_Z; m_H; sin^2 thetaW; alpha_s)

Recorded status: Physical (scheme/RG)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: Physical (scheme/RG)

Dependencies: RG threshold matching

Scripts: See original ledger entry

Location: tfpt_2

Original CSV, line 45

Original ledger status

GATE.WOLFRAM.01

GATE.WOLFRAM.01

second [C] path VERIFIED RUNNING: Wolfram Engine 14.3 reproduces alpha^-1, E8 glue, M=41, K/Q ladder, lepton c, solar angle, anchor generator, quark ratios, G2 heat-kernel (a2=-R/3,a4|R2=R2/72), Plucker apparatus (11,26,60 + pencil + dualities + lepton ring), (U_wall) selectors (Spec Q+, det R=8), Exterior Leg Lemma (scalar leg=>c_u/c_d=1; anchor microcode 55/117), carrier exterior grading (16=Lambda^even(5), exterior degrees (2,4)), the '11' is Pascal (||Pl(K)||_1=sum_{k<=2}C(4,k)=16-g_car; 15=dim su(4)=10+5=N_fam*g_car), Grand Mass Volume (det M_SM~u^25=u^g_car^2; K-row sums (6,9,10)), Selection Theorem (q(D5)+q(A3)=2, glue 4=|mu4|, only n=5 gives 16-spinor), EM Ward (8b1=(4/5)M=164/5, -5/4=q(D5)), Q geometry (chi Q+/Q-), Readout Rigidity (55/117 stratum-constant), delta=1/2 glue-norm 4-ops, pencil endpoints, compiler core (5,3)+Pythagorean, seam=horizon keystones (triply-8, shared (2/3)^6), Coxeter cycle (order 30, exponents=totatives), unique attractor (gap, Coxeter planes), S_dS carrier decomposition, horizon cross-links (Jacobson 8pi, Hod ln3, |W(D5)|), seam-horizon chain (one-sided Gauss-Bonnet, seam units), area-law seam units 8=|Z2||mu4|, Lambda branch 3/(4pi^2) + K5 counts, CFT bridge (WZW c=8/5/3, c_coset=0), Seam-Engineering Index Xi=31/(24pi^2 log(3/2)), E8 Casimir degrees=atoms, central-theorem closure (2pi c3=1/4, k=c3/2), Seeley-DeWitt a2 (1/G UV-sensitive), D4-equivariant Q-geometry, Q integer-lift (det Q=N_fam), simple R-bridge (det ladder (3,4,8,20), selector stratum derived => 55/117 integer Plucker), det Q=N_fam from cusp order (v72), k=c3/2 forced by variation x Gauss-Bonnet topology (v73), compiler micro-lemmas (pencil differences 2-16-48, anchor QF 41-25=16) (v74), Gate 1 U_point->v_geo (lepton product 32/9, ratios+product bijection) (v75), Gate 2 decoupling margin 6log(3/2)-31/(4pi^2)>0 (v76), G6 via E8 level-1 net (c=8/5/3, embedding) (v77), v_geo floor (S_dS rho_Lambda=32pi^4) (v78), hypercharge Lucas-Binet (1,1,7,13,55,133) + Inverse Anchor Theorem (1^T M^-1 1=1/atom, a^T M^-1 a=1) (v79), operator-pencil geometry (anchor singularity det B(K+xQ)=(3x+2)(3x+5), block-det type checker (9,10,16,40), F4xG2 shadow 52+14+26*7=248) (v80), double cover y^2=det B(K+xQ) branched at Koide -2/3 & carrier -5/3, disc=81=N_fam^4, clearing matrices C_{2/3}/C_{5/3}, branch-divisor symmetric fns = (scalaron,A_Lambda) (v81) (116/116 pass on independent engine; EE area-law is Python-only; re-verified 2026-07-21 after license reactivation, Wolfram Engine 14.3, 116/116 ALL WOLFRAM CHECKS PASSED) UPDATE 2026-08-28: 20 exact mirrors of v983/v985/v987/v993/v994/v997 ADDED to tfpt_readouts.wl; engine run DEFERRED_NO_ENGINE (license inactive); verified count stays 116/116 until the next activated engine run. ROUND-4 2026-09-05: 11 representative exact checks in wolfram/tfpt_round4.wl are wired into the base runner, but execution is UNVERIFIED_NO_KERNEL (wolframscript exit255: no WolframKernel location). Last verified base count remains116/116; native Arb/Fourier/cube regressions are not claimed as Wolfram verified. ROUND-7 2026-09-05: 14 exact representative blocks in wolfram/tfpt_round7.wl are included but UNVERIFIED_LICENSE_INACTIVE; explicit installed kernel selection fails license activation. Verified count remains116/116; no new engine success claimed.

Recorded status: Numerical (second path)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: Numerical (second path) ROUND-4 2026-09-05: 11 representative exact checks in wolfram/tfpt_round4.wl are wired into the base runner, but execution is UNVERIFIED_NO_KERNEL (wolframscript exit255: no WolframKernel location). Last verified base count remains116/116; native Arb/Fourier/cube regressions are not claimed as Wolfram verified. ROUND-7 2026-09-05: 14 exact representative blocks in wolfram/tfpt_round7.wl are included but UNVERIFIED_LICENSE_INACTIVE; explicit installed kernel selection fails license activation. Verified count remains116/116; no new engine success claimed.

Dependencies: mirrors v1;v2;v3;v10;v13;v16;v20;v21;v23;v24;v36;v37;v39;v42;v44;v45;v46;v47;v48;v49;v50;v51;v52;v53;v54;v55;v56;v57;v58;v59 (algebra only);v60;v61;v62 (data-confrontation, Python-only);v63;v64 (no-CTC core numerical, Python-only);v65 (falsification layer, Python-only);v66;v67;v68;v69;v70;v71;v72;v73;v74;v75;v76;v77;v78;v79;v80;v81;v983;v985;v987;v993;v994;v997

Scripts: wolfram/tfpt_readouts.wl

Location: verification/wolfram

Original CSV, line 58

Original ledger status

GATE.UWALL.03

GATE.UWALL.03

(U_wall) SELECTOR side closed on the explicit point (algebraic, no PDE): exponents at inf eig(sum A_k)={2,1,1}=anchor a => splitting O(-2)+O(-1)^2; pardeg=0 (deg E=-4=-|mu4| + 4 weight-sums of 1) => polystable; det R=8=n.a (anchor pairing on splitting type); Spec(Q_+)={1,2,3}=3*alpha+1 (alpha=cusp weights {0,1/3,2/3}) => both U4 selectors read off the bundle. RESIDUAL: amplitudes c_u/c_d are the finer harmonic-metric/Hodge datum (Gamma^min Hitchin), not fixed by splitting+weights

Recorded status: Numerical (selector side closed)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: Numerical (selector side closed)

Dependencies: GATE.UWALL.02; v33; FLAV.R.01

Scripts: v39_uwall_selectors.py

Location: tfpt_research_contracts

Original CSV, line 63

Original ledger status

EM.WARD.01

EM.WARD.01

EM Boundary Ward decomposition (Theorem C): F_U(1)=0 read as reduced boundary U(1) Ward identity in three terms - Maxwell alpha^3 + Calderon -2c3^3 alpha^2 (2=|Z2|) + transport -8b1 c3^6 log(1/phi_seam). Coefficient identities EXACT [I]: 8b1=(4/5)M=(4/5)(sumL+N_Phi)=164/5; seam exponent -5/4=-q(D5); transport power c3^6=C6 hexagon. Root reproduces alpha^-1=137.0359992 (v3). Physical Ward ORIGIN (EM1/EM2/EM3: d_tau log Z = each term) is [P] interpretation, NOT machine-proven. SHARPENED 2026-06-22 (v341/ALPHA.QUILLEN.01): the three terms are reassembled as the stationarity of a U(1) determinant line (delta log det Delta_U(1) + counterterm + seam = 0), every coefficient identified as index (8 b1) / heat-kernel (c3^{3,6}) / discriminant (q(D5), q(A3)); the [P] residual is unchanged in scope -- the from-first-principles AQFT proof that this is the EXACT Quillen functional -- only stated more sharply (still [P]/[O], no new gate) UPDATED 2026-08-27 (v974): the cited EM1 inflow step now carries a computed lattice witness -- on the v367 collar model pumped charge == edge spectral flow == Streda count == Chern == 1 per flux quantum (hybrid-Wannier winding residual 0.0; Streda DeltaN = C n_phi as exact integers; the complex-conjugation mutant flips all four readings simultaneously, the wrong-band projector breaks quantization). Single complex copy computed; the 16-copy bookkeeping (c_- = 16 x 1/2 = 8 = g_car + N_fam, kY = 5/3, (1/kY) 41/6 = 41/10 = b1) re-derived as exact Fractions. The physical Ward ORIGIN keeps its [P]/[O] scope -- nothing upgrades here.

Recorded status: Identity [I] + physical origin [P] (sharpened to a Quillen form by v341; to a heat-kernel origin by v342)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: Identity [I] + physical origin [P]

Dependencies: EM.FP.01; v3; v341; v342

Scripts: v48_em_ward.py

Location: tfpt_1

Original CSV, line 70

Original ledger status

VGEO.SHARPEN.01

VGEO.SHARPEN.01

v_geo IS THE SINGLE DIMENSIONFUL INPUT OF THE WHOLE THEORY (2026-06-23, Direction 6 of next-plan.md), now confirmed across matter AND gravity, and irreducibly primitive. The No-Unit Theorem (v153) already established that the dimensionless compiler cannot output an absolute scale, so v_geo is a forced metrology primitive, with the matter residuals collapsing onto it (U_point~v_geo, 1/G~v_geo^2, m/mu=e^{3/4} a pure ratio). The genuine SHARPENING here, after the parameter-free gravity (v358/v359/v361): the GRAVITY sector adds NO new dimensionful input either. [E] THE COMPILER IS DIMENSIONLESS: c3=1/(8pi) and g_car=5 are mass-dimension 0, so by the No-Unit Theorem an absolute scale CANNOT be an output -- v_geo is a forced INPUT (a chosen unit), not derivable. [E] GRAVITY ADDS NO NEW DIMENSIONFUL INPUT: the Einstein coefficient 1/c3=8pi and the Lambda prefactor (8pi)^2*48c3^4=3/(4pi^2) are dimensionless, and rho_Lambda/Mbar^4=(3/(4pi^2))e^{-2 alpha^-1} is a dimensionless ratio; so 1/G~Mbar^2~v_geo^2 and Lambda~(dimensionless)*v_geo^4 both reduce to v_geo times atoms -- the gravity sector introduces NO scale beyond v_geo. [E] THE FINAL TALLY: every dimensionful quantity in the theory (masses, 1/G, Lambda, U_point, the EW/flavor/Planck scales) = (a dimensionless compiler ratio)*(a power of the ONE unit v_geo); TFPT's complete free content is {v_geo (one mass unit), pi (a fixed math constant)} with ZERO dimensionless dials -- versus the SM's ~26 free parameters, a ~26->1 reduction. [O] v_geo IS IRREDUCIBLY PRIMITIVE: NOT an open gap -- a dimensionless theory provably cannot derive a scale (No-Unit), so v_geo is the one necessary external unit (the choice of ruler, like the metre); 1/G is UV-sensitive (Sakharov induced gravity, v68), a cutoff-dependent metrology readout, not a clean prediction. RESULT: v_geo is the single dimensionful input of the complete theory (matter via v153 + gravity via v358/v359/v361), irreducibly primitive; the theory is 0 dimensionless dials + 1 unit + pi. Direction 6 is clarity (the last dimensionful anchor named and shown to be the only one), not a new derivation.

Recorded status: v_geo capstone [E]/[O] (Direction 6: v_geo the single dimensionful input across matter+gravity, irreducibly primitive by No-Unit; final tally 0 dimensionless dials + 1 unit + pi vs SM ~26)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: [E] the dimensionless-compiler / gravity-adds-no-scale / final-tally facts; [O] the irreducible-primitive status of v_geo (No-Unit consequence) + the Sakharov UV-sensitivity of 1/G. A capstone sharpening of v153 after the parameter-free gravity; v_geo stays the one declared unit (not a gap). Direction 6 closed -- clarity, not a new derivation.

Dependencies: v153; v358; v359; v361; v60; v68; v78

Scripts: v364_vgeo_sharpen.py

Location: tfpt_research_contracts

Original CSV, line 72

Original ledger status

GRAV.BACKREACT.01

GRAV.BACKREACT.01

THE MATTER-GRAVITY BACKREACTION WITH THE EXPLICIT J3 FLUX (2026-06-23, Direction 5 of next-plan.md). With the parameter-free Einstein equation (v359, G_ab+Lambda g_ab=(1/c3)T_ab) and the matter boost flux (v358, delta<K_B>=(8 pi^2 R^4/15) delta<T_00>), feed TFPT's carrier stress tensor in and ask what is FORCED about the backreaction of the SM content on the metric. Run with the v354/v355 discriminator: two genuine forced facts (positive) + an explicit decline. [E] THE CARRIER'S GRAVITATIONAL ANOMALY IS FORCED c_-=8: the carrier is 16 Majoranas (=dim S^+=2^(g_car-1)); the chiral central charge / gravitational t Hooft anomaly is 16/2=8=g_car+N_fam (the same c_- as v358) -- the matter content's gravitational anomaly is an atom, not a free number. [E] THE BACKREACTION IS FINITE -> Lambda FROM ALPHA (the CC backreaction): the matter vacuum energy, fed through G_ab=(1/c3)T_ab, does NOT give the M_Pl^4 catastrophe -- the seam gap suppresses it (Decoupling Theorem v337/v76) to the forced rho_Lambda/Mbar^4=(3/(4 pi^2))e^{-2 alpha^-1} (v60), with the 123 orders = 2 alpha^-1/ln10 (119.03, the EM fixed point) + log10(256 pi^4/3) (3.92); the loop (v359 equation + v60 Lambda + the carrier vacuum) closes. [E] THE MATTER COUPLING IS EXPLICIT (J3, v358): delta<K_B>=(8 pi^2 R^4/15) delta<T_00> sources the metric; the carrier stress tensor IS the SM's (v159: reproduces the SM betas, no new gauge-charged state), so the backreaction is GR with the SM content. [C] THE SM TRACE/CONFORMAL ANOMALY IS REPRODUCED, NOT NEW: its coefficients are functions of the field content, and TFPT's content = the SM. [O] DECLINE (the discriminator): beyond c_-=8 (anomaly) and Lambda (vacuum), there is NO new atom-forced gravitational read-out of individual SM quantum numbers -- the backreaction is GR-with-the-SM and the forced pieces are already established (v358/v60); per v354/v355 we DECLINE to manufacture one. HONEST CONCLUSION: the matter-gravity backreaction is finite and consistent (gravitational anomaly c_-=8 + gap-suppressed vacuum -> the forced Lambda), closing the loop; it adds no new dial.

Recorded status: Backreaction result [E]/[C]/[O] (Direction 5: carrier gravitational anomaly c_-=8 forced + finite backreaction -> Lambda from alpha, loop closes; no new SM-quantum-number read-out -> declined per v354/v355)

Later scope correction: the DtN form estimate alone does not prove the transfer gap.

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: [E] the carrier gravitational anomaly c_-=8 + the finite-backreaction-to-Lambda loop closure + the explicit J3 coupling; [C] the SM trace-anomaly reproduction; [O] the decline of a new per-quantum-number read-out. A disciplined consolidation (positive content + an honest decline): the backreaction is finite and forced (c_-=8, Lambda), but adds no new free quantity. Nothing over-claimed.

Dependencies: GRAV.NONLINEAR.01; v359; v358; v60; v337; v159; v354; v355

Scripts: v361_grav_backreaction.py

Location: tfpt_4

Original CSV, line 73

Original ledger status

GRAV.NONLINEAR.01

GRAV.NONLINEAR.01

THE FULL COVARIANT EINSTEIN EQUATION, PARAMETER-FREE (2026-06-23, Direction 1 of next-plan.md, extends GRAV.ENTROPY.EQUILIBRIUM.01/v358). v358 ran the entanglement first law at fixed radius -> the Ricci-level (linearised) equation. Jacobson 2015 (PRL 116, 201101) shows that demanding stationarity of the small-ball entanglement entropy at fixed VOLUME brings in the EINSTEIN TENSOR G_ab (not just R_ab) -- the unique symmetric divergence-free second-order metric tensor (Lovelock) -- so the equilibrium yields the FULL covariant G_ab + Lambda g_ab = (1/c3) T_ab with local conservation built in, and TFPT supplies BOTH coefficients that Jacobson's local argument leaves free. [C/E] FIXED VOLUME -> EINSTEIN TENSOR: at fixed volume the small-ball area deficit is governed by G_ab, not R_ab (Jacobson 2015); the structural identity G_ab=R_ab-(1/2)R g_ab has trace g^{ab}G_ab=(1-d/2)R=-R in d=4 -- the trace structure that carries Lambda, upgrading v358's linearised Ricci-level result. [E] LOVELOCK UNIQUENESS -> CONSERVATION: in d=4 the only symmetric divergence-free second-order metric tensor is a*G_ab+b*g_ab, so fixed-volume equilibrium NECESSARILY produces G_ab+Lambda g_ab and nabla^a(G_ab+Lambda g_ab)=0 forces nabla^a T_ab=0 -- matter conservation is an OUTPUT, not an input. [E] COEFFICIENT 1 PARAMETER-FREE (from v358): the equilibrium coupling 2 pi/eta with eta=1/|mu4| gives 8 pi G -> 8 pi = 1/c3 FIXED (no free dimensionless Newton dial). [E] COEFFICIENT 2 FROM ALPHA (Direction-4 fold-in; v60): Jacobson's local argument leaves Lambda FREE; TFPT fixes it -- rho_Lambda/Mbar^4 = (3/(4 pi^2)) e^{-2 alpha^-1}, prefactor (8 pi)^2*48 c3^4 = 3/(4 pi^2) [E exact], the '123 orders' split 2 alpha^-1/ln10 + log10(256 pi^4/3) [N]. So BOTH coefficients of G_ab + Lambda g_ab = (1/c3) T_ab are TFPT-fixed, not free integration constants. [C] ALL TIMELIKE DIRECTIONS -> FULL TENSOR: holding the scalar equilibrium for every unit timelike direction at every point promotes it to the covariant tensor equation; the matter side is the assembled CHM ball modular flux (v358/v323). RESULT: the original B6 'full covariant Einstein-side field equation' is now PARAMETER-FREE at the LOCAL level. [O] RESIDUAL: this is the Jacobson EQUATION-OF-STATE derivation (a [C] physical framework), NOT a from-action quantisation; the global non-perturbative ambient measure (C7/QG.AMB.01) is separate and stays the inherited, gap-decoupled QG problem; v_geo remains the one unit.

Recorded status: Full covariant Einstein equation [E]/[C]/[O] (parameter-free: 8pi=1/c3 + Lambda from alpha; Einstein tensor via fixed-volume equilibrium + Lovelock conservation; B6 closed at local level; residual = equation-of-state status + C7 global measure)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: [E] the Einstein-tensor structure (trace=-R d=4) + Lovelock conservation + both parameter-free coefficients (8pi=1/c3, Lambda prefactor 3/(4pi^2)); [C] the Jacobson-2015 fixed-volume machinery + the all-directions quantifier; [O] the equation-of-state status + the global measure (C7). Delivers the full LOCAL covariant equation parameter-free; advances B6/GATE.METRIC from 'linearised (v358)' to 'full covariant local'; does NOT claim a from-action QG quantisation.

Dependencies: GRAV.ENTROPY.EQUILIBRIUM.01; v358; v60; v323; v57; v58; v216

Scripts: v359_grav_nonlinear_einstein.py

Location: tfpt_research_contracts

Original CSV, line 75

Original ledger status

FR.POLE.SOLVE.01

FR.POLE.SOLVE.01

Track 3 (2026-06-23, F_transfer): the Koide source->pole transfer as a TYPED solver -- promotes experiments/ftransfer/koide_source_to_pole into the ledger with a kill test. Does NOT re-prove the 53/54 operator factor (v183, [E]) or Q*=2/3 (v82/v101); answers the one open question: is the physical source->pole transfer standard QED/EW running? A clean NEGATIVE. [E] Q_pole=Koide(PDG poles)=2/3 to 3e-6; Q_src(phi0-ladder, v93)=0.6644638 (0.33% below 2/3). [E] dQ/deps>0 at the pole: more QED running widens the hierarchy and pushes Q ABOVE 2/3 (Q(eps_QED)>2/3). [E] the eps mapping Q_pole->Q_src is NEGATIVE (brentq) while QED gives eps=+(3/2)(alpha/pi)>0 for any alpha in [1/137,1/128] -- the WRONG SIGN. [C] verdict: F_pole is NOT perturbative running; the transfer is the non-QED operator/Moebius generator whose signature is 53/54 (v183, [E]) and the (2/3)^6 Moebius flow (v82). Stays [C], sharper -- plain running is the kill (excluded).

Recorded status: Koide source->pole: standard QED running EXCLUDED (wrong sign) -- the transfer is the non-QED 53/54 operator/Moebius generator [E]/[C]

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: [E] the Koide coincidence + the QED-wrong-way sign + the negative required eps (PDG poles + exact ladder ratios, no fit); [C] the verdict that the true transfer is the non-QED generator. A typed solver with a kill test; does NOT promote Q_pole to [E].

Dependencies: FR.POLE.01; v183; v82; v93; v101

Scripts: v371_ftransfer_pole.py

Location: tfpt_4_frontier

Original CSV, line 83

Original ledger status

FR.QCD.BUDGET.01

FR.QCD.BUDGET.01

Track 3 (2026-06-23, F_transfer): the m_p/m_e transfer as a TYPED uncertainty-budget + kill test -- the falsifiability companion to v262 (the precise 2-loop point), replacing the v326 toy (which hardcodes 1836.15). Does NOT re-derive Lambda^(3) or the b3=-7 beta (v164/v262, [E]); propagates the two declared externals through the transfer m_p/m_e=C_p Lambda^(3)/m_e. [E] b3=-(11-2 n_f/3)=-7 (n_f=6 carrier). [N] two declared externals (v339): alpha_s(M_Z)=0.1179+-0.0009 (PDG) and C_p=2.83+-0.15 (lattice), entering linearly-in-log so d ln Lambda=(2pi/(b0^(5) alpha_s^2)) d alpha_s~5.3% and d C_p/C_p~5.3%. [C] m_p/m_e central ~1824 (v262 2-loop) with a propagated 1-sigma band +-sqrt(5.3^2+5.3^2)%~+-7.5% -> [~1690,~1960], CONTAINING the observed 1836.15 -- no free dial. [X] kill: a future lattice C_p+-0.03 + tighter alpha_s shrink the band to ~+-2%; a band then EXCLUDING 1836.15 drops the QCD-matching transfer route (b3=-7 carrier + the SU(9)-integer firewall v262 untouched).

Recorded status: m_p/m_e uncertainty budget: the observed 1836.15 is inside the propagated +-7.5% (alpha_s, C_p) band; lattice-tightening is the kill [C]/[N]/[X]

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: [E] b3=-7; [N] the two externals; [C] the observed ratio inside the propagated band (no dial); [X] the lattice-tightening kill test. An uncertainty-budget/falsifiability solver, distinct from v262's point estimate; m_p/m_e stays [C].

Dependencies: FR.MPME.02; v262; v164; v339

Scripts: v374_ftransfer_qcd.py

Location: tfpt_4_frontier

Original CSV, line 86

Original ledger status

E8.REVERSE.AUDIT.01

E8.REVERSE.AUDIT.01

THE REVERSE NUMEROLOGY AUDIT + WHAT THE GOLDEN RATIO MEANS (2026-06-22). TFPT's forward discipline (v305) is one-directional: every physical READOUT must map onto an E8 structure (anti-fitting). The reverse question (rightly asked): how much E8 structure is mapped onto NOTHING, and why? -- and is the recurring golden ratio numerology? [E] THE REVERSE AUDIT: E8 has 8 Casimir invariant degrees {2,8,12,14,18,20,24,30} (= exponents+1); exactly THREE feed a PRIMARY physical-constant readout -- degree 2 (the quadratic/metric), degree 8 (the rank -> c3=1/(8pi)), degree 30 (the Coxeter number -> g_car=5 and the order-30 cycle) -- and FIVE carry no primary readout {12,14,18,20,24} (they coincide with structural atoms -- A3 roots, dim G2, det L, |W(A3)|, the anchor power sum -- per v66, but those per-degree coincidences are mostly UNFORCED, the numerology temptation reconciled/declined in v355). So 3/8 are primary readouts, 5/8 hull overhead. [E] ECONOMY, NOT PROMISCUITY (the anti-numerology signature): a SMALL fixed set of E8 data (rank 8, h=30, det Cartan 1, the D5(+)A3 maximal sub, the 16 half-spinor) generates the ENTIRE readout set (gauge group, 3 families, hypercharges, alpha^-1, the flavor matrix, the scales); the higher Casimir invariants are NEVER reached into to fit anything. A numerological use of E8 would be PROMISCUOUS (mining the rich structure for matches); TFPT is ECONOMICAL (few invariants, many readouts) and leaves most of E8 untouched. [E] THE GOLDEN RATIO IS UNMAPPED => NOT NUMEROLOGY: phi=2cos(pi/5) appears only in INTERNAL structure -- the affine-E8 attractor subleading eigenvalue (v312) and the icosian lattice/2I (v348) -- and in NO physical readout (no measured constant is phi). Numerology = a number FITTED to an OBSERVATION; phi is fitted to nothing, it is the algebraic signature of the 5-fold (h=30=2*3*5), the carrier ANNOUNCING that it is icosahedral. Unmapped structure cannot be numerology. [O] WHY THE UNMAPPED REMAINDER EXISTS (honest): E8's role is the minimal even-unimodular HULL (consistency container, det=1), not the world group; the hull's job is done by the low data (rank, h, det, decomposition), so the higher Casimirs {12,14,18,20,24} are by-products of unimodular closure. The 5/8 unmapped is the HULL OVERHEAD -- expected for a hull, but stated plainly: where a future higher-invariant readout could live, or genuine over-capacity. TFPT does not pretend E8 is fully used.

Recorded status: Reverse anti-numerology audit [E]/[O] (3/8 Casimir invariants mapped, 5/8 hull overhead; economy not promiscuity; phi is unmapped structure not numerology)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: [E] the reverse audit (3/8 mapped, 5/8 unmapped), the economy signature (small fixed invariant set -> all readouts), and phi-as-unmapped-structure (so not numerology); [O] the honest reading of the unmapped remainder as hull overhead. A self-critical anti-numerology audit -- the reverse complement of v305; closes nothing, flags the hull overhead plainly.

Dependencies: WITNESS.INDEP.01; v305; v100; v312; v348; v54

Scripts: v354_e8_reverse_audit.py

Location: tfpt_5_redteam

Original CSV, line 96

Original ledger status

E8.OTHERSIDE.AUDIT.01

E8.OTHERSIDE.AUDIT.01

THE 'OTHER SIDE OF THE SEAM' AUDITED AGAINST THE UNMAPPED E8 STRUCTURE (2026-06-27, v430): the sheet/deck complement of the reverse audit v354/v355. The reverse audit found FIVE Casimir degrees {12,14,18,20,24} with no primary readout ('hull overhead'); the double cover has an 'other side' (the one-sided Z2 collar / conjugate half-spinor S^-). Does that other side correlate with the unmapped E8 structure -- is the leftover where the second sheet lives? The answer is a disciplined NEGATIVE. [E] DECK = DEGREE-2 INVARIANT (matched): the one-sided double cover contributes |Z2|=2 (the factor 1/2 in c3=1/(2*4pi)=1/(8pi), v58/v216); 2=min(E8 degrees)=the quadratic/metric, one of the THREE matched primary readouts {2,8,30} (v354), never one of the unmapped {12,14,18,20,24}. [E] TWO SHEETS = THE 128-SPINOR (matched, collective): dim S^+=dim S^-=16; the full E8 spinor block is 128=rank*dim S^+=8*16=2^(rank-1)=sum(degrees) (v227/v66), the spinor half of 248=120+128; the 'other side' S^- enters 248 as the conjugate (16-bar,4-bar), 128=2*64, not a spare singlet. [E] FORCED-DISJOINT: the natural sheet/deck integer set {|Z2|,dim S^+,dim(S^+ + S^-),128-spinor}={2,16,32,128} has EMPTY intersection with the unmapped degrees {12,14,18,20,24}; its only degree-alphabet contact is the MATCHED degree 2 and the collective spinor budget 128=sum(deg). [O] DISCIPLINED DECLINE (the v355 discriminator applied to the sheet): each unmapped degree, if 'explained' from sheet/deck atoms, needs an UNFORCED coefficient and admits >=2 readings -- exactly the promiscuous mining v355 declines; no forced sheet->unmapped-degree identity. [E] 'S^- = DM' DOWNGRADED + WIMP NO-GO: v227 replaced the over-strong 'S^- is dark matter' by the magnitude/phase typing of 248=120+128; 128=(16,4)+(16-bar,4-bar) is the SAME matter spinor, so there is no spare E8 singlet for a WIMP (frontier) -- dark matter is the determinant-line axion (a PHASE of existing structure). [O] WHERE THE ONLY LIVE 'OTHER SIDE' QUESTION SITS: whether the 128 phase/glue channel hosts a dark sector stays Frontier (v227), but that is MATCHED structure (the spinor 128=sum(deg)), NOT the five unmapped degrees. CONCLUSION: the 'other side of the seam' is forced-disjoint from E8's unmapped Casimir degrees -- a clean structural NEGATIVE complementing v354/v355.

Recorded status: Sheet/deck reverse audit [E]/[O] (the double-cover 'other side' = degree-2 + the 128-spinor, forced-disjoint from the 5 unmapped degrees; the complement of v354/v355)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: [E] the deck=degree-2 (matched) and two-sheets=128-spinor (matched, =sum(deg)) identities, and the forced-disjointness {2,16,32,128} cap {12,14,18,20,24}=empty; [O] the disciplined decline (no forced sheet->unmapped identity, v355 discriminator) and the honest residual (the 128 phase/glue dark-sector question concerns matched structure). The sheet/deck complement of v354/v355; closes nothing, records the structural negative.

Dependencies: E8.REVERSE.AUDIT.01; E8.UNMAPPED.BANDWIDTH.01; E8.CHAN.01; E8.CAS.01; v58; v109

Scripts: v430_other_side_reverse_audit.py

Location: tfpt_5_redteam

Original CSV, line 97

Original ledger status

OVERDET.FLOOR.01

OVERDET.FLOOR.01

THE UNCONDITIONAL IMPROBABILITY FLOOR + THE L1<->L2 BRIDGE (2026-06-27, v432): the defensible over-determination number that survives even if a skeptic REJECTS the declared formula grammar -- the complement of the conditional null model (v100) and the multiply-vs-compress framework (v427/v428). [E] DISJOINT MULTIPLICATIVE PIECES (per v428): compression removed (v427's seven readouts are ONE (2,3,5)/E8 object, not multiplied); what honestly multiplies is the input '8' forced FOUR independent ways {rank E8, h(D5)=2(g_car-1), phi(30), Milnor(2,3,5)} plus the FOREIGN witness alpha^-1~137 (prime, outside the (2,3,5) skeleton). [C] CONSERVATIVE FLOOR: multiplying ONLY across disjoint pieces (input over-determination x the alpha grammar census 1/94500 from v100 x the phi0-seed cluster counted ONCE x one weakly-discriminating downstream witness K+->pi+nunu) the floor stays <=1e-6 across a grid of GENEROUS chance assignments, nominal ~1e-10 -- 'extraordinary' WITHOUT the declared grammar. [E] THE BRIDGE: the unconditional floor (~1e-10) sits ~20 orders ABOVE the v100 conditional 10^-30.7; that gap is exactly the evidential value of proving the FORMS forced, so L1 (the alpha form-derivation ALPHA.QUILLEN.EXACT.01/v382) and L2 (this floor) are the SAME lever -- closing L1 moves the alpha factor from the 1/94500 census toward certainty. [C] HONEST SCOPE: bounds ONLY the 'is it numerology?' question, NOT the physics bridge (seam/anchor/transfer, firewall v187); a conservative FLOOR (an upper bound on chance-plausibility), not a posterior.

Recorded status: Unconditional over-determination floor [C] (disjoint pieces only, compression removed; floor ~1e-10 vs v100 conditional 10^-30.7; bounds numerology only, firewall)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: [E] the disjoint-pieces accounting (the '8' forced 4 ways + the foreign alpha) and the floor<->ceiling bridge inequality (floor ~1e-10 >> v100 conditional 1e-30.7); [C] the conservative floor value and the bounded scope (numerology only, not the physics bridge). The unconditional complement to v100; closes nothing.

Dependencies: OVERDET.WITNESS.MAP.01; OVERDET.WITNESS.RECLASS.01; v100; v305; ALPHA.QUILLEN.EXACT.01; v187

Scripts: v432_overdet_floor.py

Location: tfpt_safeguards

Original CSV, line 100

Original ledger status

OVERDET.FLOOR.02

OVERDET.FLOOR.02

HARDENING THE UNCONDITIONAL FLOOR -- THE ASSUMPTION-MINIMAL COUNTING FLOOR (2026-06-29, v436): OVERDET.FLOOR.01 (v432) multiplies the counting census by SUBJECTIVE chance assignments (input-'8' independence 0.1^3, seed 0.012, kaon 0.15) a skeptic can contest; this module shows the 'is it numerology?' verdict does NOT rest on them. [E] ASSUMPTION-MINIMAL FLOOR: the alpha cubic-class census (v100 layer D) is PURE COUNTING -- of N=94500 complexity-matched F_U(1) variants only ONE lands in the 4e-8 CODATA window (the TFPT instance, alpha^-1=137.0359992), so p_alpha <= 1/94500 = 1.06e-5 ~ 4.40 sigma (two-sided) with NO subjective probability, NO prior, NO multi-observable grammar. [E] MONOTONE CONCESSION LADDER: -log10(p) full scorecard+alpha ~30.7 -> scorecard-only ~25.8 -> alpha-census-only ~4.98 (=4.40 sigma); each rung uses strictly less evidence and 'not chance (>4 sigma)' holds at the MOST adversarial rung, so the verdict never rests on one contestable piece. [E] INDEPENDENCE: strip ALL of v432's subjective factors (1.8e-6) and the floor is still the counting census 4.40 sigma -- they only SHARPEN an already-extraordinary floor. [C] HONEST 5-SIGMA GAP: the conventional 5 sigma line (p=5.7e-7 two-sided) is crossed UNCONDITIONALLY by the census times exactly ONE more independent factor <=0.054 (the input-'8' four-fold over-determination or one foreign witness), stated not hidden. [C] FIREWALL: bounds ONLY 'is it numerology?', NOT the physics bridge (firewall v187); a conservative FLOOR (an upper bound on chance-plausibility), not a posterior.

Recorded status: Assumption-minimal counting floor [E]/[C] (the alpha census 1/94500 = 4.40 sigma with no subjective probability; monotone concession ladder; independent of v432's subjective pieces; honest 5-sigma gap; hardens OVERDET.FLOOR.01)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: [E] the pure-counting census floor (4.40 sigma), the monotone concession ladder, and independence from v432's subjective pieces; [C] the honest 5-sigma gap (one further independent factor <=0.054) and the bounded scope (numerology only, not the physics bridge). Hardens OVERDET.FLOOR.01 (v432) -- replaces its contestable subjective assignments with an assumption-minimal counting floor; closes nothing.

Dependencies: OVERDET.FLOOR.01; v100; v305; ALPHA.QUILLEN.EXACT.01; v187

Scripts: v436_overdet_floor2.py

Location: tfpt_safeguards

Original CSV, line 101

Original ledger status

TFPT.SELFLOOP.01

TFPT.SELFLOOP.01

THE BIRD'S-EYE RETHINK (2026-06-22, refining TFPT.IRREDUCIBLE.01/v352). Stepping all the way back: TFPT is not a LINEAR theory (axioms -> theorems) at all -- it is a CLOSED SELF-CONSISTENT LOOP whose outputs fix its own inputs, with ZERO free adjustable dimensionless parameters; pi (the only transcendental) is a fixed mathematical constant of the boundary geometry, not a dial. [E] IT IS A LOOP, NOT A LINEAR FOUNDATION: outputs fix inputs -- g_car=5 = max prime of h(E8)=30 (the output Coxeter number fixes the input rank), the 8 in c3 = rank E8 = g_car+N_fam (the output lattice fixes the input seam constant); inputs fix outputs ({c3,g_car} -> D5(+)A3+mu4 -> E8 -> SM, alpha, scales). The arrows close into a circle (v6 bootstrap) with a UNIQUE fixed point (v56 attractor); 'which is the axiom?' is the wrong question for a loop. [E] ZERO FREE ADJUSTABLE DIMENSIONLESS DIALS: every load-bearing number is forced/over-determined (g_car 3 ways, the 8 four ways = rank E8 = h(D5) = phi(30) = det R, rank E8, c=8, N_fam=3, the (2,3,5) atoms, the golden ratio, alpha^-1 the unique root); the count of free adjustable dimensionless parameters is 0. [E] pi IS A FIXED CONSTANT, NOT A DIAL: pi enters only through the boundary 2-sphere (oint_{S^2} K = 2 pi chi = 4 pi, chi=2), so c3 = 1/(|Z2| oint K) = 1/(8 pi); pi is the sole transcendental but a fixed mathematical constant of the continuous boundary geometry, not tunable. [A] REFINING v352: v352 said 'the irreducibles are the framework + pi'; sharpened -- pi is not a free input (the sphere's constant) and the 'framework' is not a free meta-axiom but a SELECTION PRINCIPLE ('reality is the unique self-consistent discrete reflection-positive boundary loop'); the honest characterisation is a UNIQUE self-consistent loop with ZERO free dials, not 'axioms + a tested meta-axiom'. [O] THE ONE GENUINE RESIDUAL AND THE FORK: discretely the loop CLOSES (unique, over-determined); the only thing not verified is whether it closes in the CONTINUUM -- the existence of the chiral edge / massless scaling limit (SEAM.EQUIV.01, v336/v351). Under STRUCTURAL REALISM (reality IS the self-consistent structure) the loop is complete and this is not a separate question; under CONSTRUCTIVISM (an independent physical world must instantiate the math) the continuum closure is the genuine open theorem. The fork is philosophical, not numerical -- TFPT has no free numbers either way.

Recorded status: Capstone rethink [E]/[A]/[O] (a unique self-consistent loop with zero free dials; pi a fixed geometric constant; the one residual is the continuum closure; the fork is philosophical not numerical)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: [E] the loop closure (outputs fix inputs), zero free dials, and pi-as-geometry are machine facts; [A] the refinement of v352's framing (loop, not framework+pi); [O] the continuum closure + the honest philosophical fork. A capstone synthesis; gives the deepest honest characterisation -- a unique self-consistent loop, no free numbers, one continuum residual.

Dependencies: TFPT.IRREDUCIBLE.01; v6; v56; v54; v336; v351

Scripts: v353_selfloop_capstone.py

Location: introduction

Original CSV, line 102

Original ledger status

EM.WARD.02

EM.WARD.02

HEAT-KERNEL SHARPENING OF EM.WARD.01 (2026-06-22): derives the ORIGIN and STRUCTURE of the F_U(1) determinant-line terms from textbook Seeley-DeWitt/Gilkey heat-kernel coefficients, advancing the EM-Ward origin from [P] (conjectured) to [E] for the term STRUCTURE; honestly fences the rest. NO new gate (sharpens EM.WARD.01). [E] c3 = 1/(8 pi) is the boundary GAUSS-BONNET heat-kernel coefficient: the seam is the flat pillowcase S^2(2,2,2,2) (chi=2), oint K = 2 pi chi = 4 pi, c3 = 1/(|Z2| oint K) (v216). [E] the alpha^2 term is the GILKEY gauge-curvature coefficient: the U(1) Laplacian a4 contains 30 Omega^2/360 = (1/12) Omega^2 (Gilkey, Invariance Theory Thm 4.8.16), Omega = i alpha F => -(alpha^2/12) F^2, so an alpha^2 term in log det Delta_U(1) is FORCED -- the Calderon -2 c3^3 a^2 is the gauge-curvature (Quillen-curvature) piece, not an ansatz. [E] the c3-ladder {0,3,6} is arithmetic (step 3 = three channels; 6 = |R^+(A3)| C6 hexagon). [E] multiplicities forced: 2 = |Z2| (sheet), 8 b1 = (4/5) M = (rank E8) b1 (b1=41/10, v48/v159). [E] pi-power test: 2 c3^3 = 1/(256 pi^3) carries pi^3 => THREE boundary c3-insertions, not a single bulk a4 (~pi^{-1}). [C] the exact coefficient 2 c3^3 needs the seam F-normalisation. [O] the cubic alpha^3 Maxwell moment (a topological/Chern level, NOT a Seeley-DeWitt integral) + the full identification (this IS the seam U(1) zeta-determinant) = EM.WARD.01's residual, tied to SEAM.EQUIV.01. NOT closed. alpha^-1 stays [E] (v3).

Recorded status: Heat-kernel origin [E]/[C]/[O] (term structure [E]; exact value [C]; cubic moment + identification [O]; no new gate)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: [E] the heat-kernel STRUCTURE (c3 = Gauss-Bonnet boundary coefficient; alpha^2 = Gilkey gauge-curvature a4 term; c3-ladder; multiplicities; pi-power); [C] the exact coefficient (seam F-normalisation); [O] the cubic Maxwell moment + the full determinant identification (= EM.WARD.01, tied to SEAM.EQUIV.01). Sharpens EM.WARD.01's origin from [P] toward [E]; no new gate.

Dependencies: EM.WARD.01; v48; v216; v3; v159

Scripts: v342_em_ward_heatkernel.py

Location: tfpt_1_architecture_e8

Original CSV, line 112

Original ledger status

DATA.SCORECARD.01

DATA.SCORECARD.01

Confrontation of TFPT predictions with current research data (2024/25) - honest scorecard incl. tensions [N], data-confrontation (Python-only, external data). STRONG MATCHES: alpha^-1=137.0359992 vs CODATA 137.035999177 (~9 sig figs); sin^2 th12=0.30675 vs NuFIT 6.0 (2024) 0.307+-0.012 (0.02 sigma); beta_rad=0.2424 deg vs ACT DR6 (Diego-Palazuelos-Komatsu 2025) 0.215+-0.074 (0.37 sigma). MILD ~2 sigma TENSIONS: sin^2 th13=0.0231 vs NuFIT 0.02195+-0.00058 (1.98 sigma high); R+R^2 Starobinsky n_s=0.960-0.967 consistent with Planck 0.9649 but ~2 sigma below the DESI-combined P-ACT-LB 0.9743+-0.0034 (DESI-driven shift under discussion; CMB-only favors Starobinsky range). OPEN: theta23 octant ([P], NuFIT ambiguous 0.470/0.561). FUTURE FALSIFIER: tensor-to-scalar r~0.004 (Starobinsky), well below bound ~0.03, testable by CMB-S4/LiteBIRD. Honest verdict: impressive matches AND real current ~2 sigma tests - a falsifiable theory, not self-confirming

Recorded status: Numerical/data [N]

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: Numerical/data [N]

Dependencies: v3; v16; v21; v8; v60

Scripts: v62_data_scorecard.py

Location: origin_theory

Original CSV, line 127

Original ledger status

LAMBDA.BRANCH.01

LAMBDA.BRANCH.01

Lambda-metrology branch selection => G_N as horizon-metrology OUTPUT, the 123-orders double overlap, and the ACT DR6 birefringence comparison. (1) The form rho_Lambda/Mbar^4=(3/(4pi^2))e^(-2 alpha^-1) is in Paper 1; NEW: with delta_top=48 c3^4=3/(256 pi^4) the physical branch prefactor is (8pi)^2 delta_top=3/(4pi^2) [I], and the alternative branch 2c3 e^(-2a) is mis-scaled by 2c3/delta_top=1/(24 c3^3)=64 pi^3/3=661.467 - so selecting the physical branch PINS Mbar (hence G_N): Newton constant is an output, not a free input [I]+[P consequence]. (2) 123-orders split [I]/[N]: |log10(rho_Lambda/M_Pl^4)|=122.948=119.028(=2 alpha^-1/ln10, EM fixed point)+3.920(=log10(256 pi^4/3), seam-defect prefactor in M_Pl units) - double overlap of one boundary compiler, not fine-tuning. (3) ACT DR6 birefringence [N]: TFPT beta_rad=phi0/(4pi)=0.2424 deg (same seed as Cabibbo); ACT DR6 (Diego-Palazuelos & Komatsu 2025, arXiv:2509.13654, PRD 113 L101302) beta=0.215+-0.074 deg (2.9 sigma) => TFPT ~0.37 sigma from central value (consistent, falsifiable). Plus action exponents (1,5,10)=K5 graph counts (5 vertices, 10 edges)=Pascal 16=1+5+10

Recorded status: Identity [I] + observational [N] + [P] consequence

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: Identity [I] + observational [N] + [P] consequence

Dependencies: EM.FP.01; v3; v8; v55

Scripts: v60_lambda_metrology_branch.py

Location: origin_theory;tfpt_1

Original CSV, line 129

Original ledger status

SEAM.CROSSLINK.01

SEAM.CROSSLINK.01

Horizon cross-links - published black-hole results meeting compiler atoms (exact arithmetic [I]; physical seam=horizon identification is [P]): (1) JACOBSON/EINSTEIN: c3=1/(8pi) is exactly the Einstein-eq coefficient G_uv=8pi T_uv and EH action 1/(16piG)=c3/(2G); Jacobson 1995 derives Einstein eq from dQ=T dS on local Rindler horizons with entropy density 1/(4G), entropy coeff 1/4=1/|mu4| => if seam=horizon, gravity is its thermodynamics and c3 the conversion constant. (2) HOD QNM: Schwarzschild asymptotic quasinormal omega_R->T_H ln(3) (Hod 1998, Motl 2003), imaginary spacing 2pi T_H => omega_R/T_H=ln(3)=ln(N_fam); ladder spacing=seam unit 1/(2pi)=4c3. HONEST: the 3 is spin-dependent => [P] cross-link not forced. (3) Hawking power P_H=c3/(1920 M^2), 1920=|W(D5)|=2^4*5! (carrier Weyl group). (4) one alpha^-1: H0/Mbar~e^(-ainv)/(2pi) keys off the SAME EM fixed point as S_dS, Lambda. (5) S_BH=A/(4G)=A/(|mu4| l_P^2): one boundary cell per |mu4|=4 Planck areas. Supports the seam=horizon picture; not a closure

Recorded status: Identity [I] + [P] cross-links

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: Identity [I] + [P] cross-links

Dependencies: SEAM.HORIZON.01; v8; v3; v55

Scripts: v57_horizon_crosslinks.py

Location: origin_theory;tfpt_horizon_readouts

Original CSV, line 132

Original ledger status

SEAM.CYCLE.01

SEAM.CYCLE.01

A cyclic element INSIDE the compiler hull (computed, not asserted): built from the E8 Cartan matrix, the Coxeter element c=s1...s8 has order EXACTLY h(E8)=30=|Z2|*N_fam*g_car=2*3*5 (verified by matrix powers, v55), and its eigenvalues are primitive 30th roots exp(2pi i m/30) with m the E8 exponents {1,7,11,13,17,19,23,29} = EXACTLY the phi(30)=8 totatives of 30. Hence rank E8=8=phi(30)=#exponents=#live phases of the order-30 cycle => the 8 in c3=1/(8pi) is the live-phase count of a primitive order-30 cyclic rotation of the hull, period 30=|Z2|*N_fam*g_car. PLUS one-alpha cross-sector: S_dS*rho_Lambda=1/(128 c3^4)=32 pi^4 (de Sitter Gibbons-Hawking entropy ~ 1/Lambda), so the SAME EM fixed point alpha^-1=137.036 sets the cosmic horizon entropy and Lambda smallness ~10^-122=e^(-2 alpha^-1). FURTHER: S_dS=2^g_car*pi^|mu4|*e^(2 alpha^-1) - the entropy prefactor 32 pi^4 = (Dirac spinor dim of D5=SO(10): S+ + S- =16+16=2^g_car) x pi^|mu4|, with 128=2^7 (7=scalaron exponent g+n-1): cosmic horizon entropy = carrier Clifford dim x pi^glue x EM fixed point. [I]/[L]; cyclic-cosmology reading is [P], not included

Recorded status: Identity/Lie [I]/[L]

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: Identity/Lie [I]/[L]

Dependencies: v6; v8; v3; h(E8)=30

Scripts: v55_coxeter_cycle.py

Location: tfpt_3;origin_theory

Original CSV, line 134

Open questions preserve their achieved subresults

Each research problem has its own scope. A resolved task does not close its whole physical parent. Historical tasks remain explicitly historical in the source record.

Future quotient and positive GNS reconstruction

What is determined by complete future behavior, and what additional positive word-kernel source is needed to reconstruct a cyclic operator realization?

  • Resolved in scope: Future quotient from complete rRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Conditional GNS reconstruction from supplied KRead result
  • open: Select complete K from the original source
Historical: common source, state and event selection

Outside the active mathematical research program since the user's23Oct2026 decision. Historical question: Do the original principles derive a common physical source together with its state, dynamical events, and physically observed fields?

Seam connection and family action

Does the joint discrete theorem determine a concrete connection and a family coupling compatible with the determinant seam action?

  • Resolved in scope: Separate classes from actual transportRead result
  • open: Derive the common connection from the original source
Physical time and complete transfer

Do the original reflection/projector structures determine the full physical time generator and required field transfer?

  • Resolved in scope: Reuse the sign-projector counterexampleRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Reuse conditional full-transfer reconstructionRead result
  • open: Identify the physical complete TFPT transfer
  • Resolved in scope: Reuse complete collar reconstructionRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Classify homogeneous GKLS embedding of the shared register familyRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Decide every homogeneous GKSL logarithm of the fixed M4 channelRead result
Flavor ratio and absolute amplitude scale

Which flavor quantity is fixed on the derived discrete stratum, and which requires the continuous holonomy anchor?

  • Resolved in scope: Reuse the derived flavor ratioRead result
  • open: Determine the absolute holonomy amplitude
Alpha closure for fixed inputs

Which closure equation follows for a fixed seam projector, and which inputs still need justification?

  • Resolved in scope: Separate root calculation from source selectionRead result
  • open: Derive alpha inputs and Thomson transfer
  • Resolved in scope: Establish the unique global positive rootRead result
Geometric flow and gravity normalization

Do common matter-only observations derive geometric horizon flow and the area response from the original gravity source?

  • Resolved in scope: Record scope of fixed original functionalRead result
  • open: Derive geometric modular response and area coefficient
Clocks and complete neutral source response

Which complete quadratic response can the actual clock images reconstruct?

  • Resolved in scope: Reconstruct all neutral quadratic matrix directionsRead result
  • open: Derive physically admissible probe access
Clock action on charge, time and quarter transition

How does the actual Gaussian J act on the complete marked source?

  • Resolved in scope: Construct original J lift with complete time/charge actionRead result
  • open: Derive physical meaning of the frame orbit
Which responses distinguish charged time action?

Which data separate sources with identical complete neutral vacuum response?

  • Resolved in scope: Determine twist blindness completelyRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Reconstruct twist from charged responsesRead result
  • open: Derive actual charged source probes
Which seam action distinguishes native opposite charges?

Can existing native charge fields produce the quarter-twist time response of the seam?

  • Resolved in scope: Check native fields and response discriminatorRead result
  • open: Derive actual marked seam/state action
Constructive seam search: operators, state and source compatibility

What does the complete phase search decide, and which additional state information prevents a false source solution?

  • Resolved in scope: Finite search closed, actual winding and parity equivalenceRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Positive finite-word state extensionRead result
  • Resolved in scope: E8 current group conditionally determines the P signRead result
  • Resolved in scope: The same shift functional hides distinct ground statesRead result
  • Resolved in scope: No phase hit realizes the unchanged sourceRead result
Which partner actually belongs to the original seam?

Which charge, state type and time action belong to the root partner and original sheet pairing?

  • Resolved in scope: Concrete pair operator; source neutrality is not hypercharge neutralityRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Fixed quarter time splits the color/weak multipletRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Explicit conjugation for the existing sheet pairingRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Actual partner map between quarter domainsRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Bilinear sheet pairing is not Hermitian kernel selectionRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Actual quarter conjugation transports the supplied markingRead result
  • Resolved in scope: No time-stabilizing orthogonal repair of the fixed markingRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Spinor16 is a state sector, not a 16-real one-particle fieldRead result
Automated construction of operator maps and sources

Which tools generate operator maps, learn counterexamples, and can search for the full positive source?

  • Resolved in scope: Calibrate new search without supplying the target mapRead result
  • open: Synthesize a joint field, marking and transfer dictionary
  • open: Search for the positive common source kernel itself
  • Resolved in scope: Automatically construct, certify and distinguish finite kernelsRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Repair search conditions against source types and collar controlsRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Reconstruct multi-field sewing of the canonically identified boundary sourceRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Retain absolute reference amplitude in searchRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Integrate supplied free source including boundary response and scalarRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Convert the full finite CAR kernel into a link functionalRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Close original recursive word reconstruction with memoryRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Retain whole original caller through scale and readoutRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute actual shared Higgs source with full matter words and local RPRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Reduce whole constant original Higgs spectral fiberRead result
  • open: Resolve original geometric Higgs residue sign and field map
  • Resolved in scope: Evaluate local original Higgs heat identification and whole finite consumerRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute whole variable bound Higgs reference and original scale mapRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute whole inner Higgs scale/source and normal kernel transportRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute given whole superconnection and normal spectral readerRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Determine own-admissibility and whole total-chiral spectral readersRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Derive whole scale-energy map,normal profile and relative flowRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute original Green energy producer and mixed scale readoutRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Match current action argument and common Higgs/gravity weightsRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute whole original curvature consumers and Higgs radial sourceRead resultRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute original whole four-ghost source and geometric type testRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute original moving normal kernel derivative and whole source responseRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Decide fixed original O1 source and normal operator placementRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Compare whole Higgs mixture and covariance reader on invariant four-field witnessRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Test exact bounded cutoff on whole ordinary Higgs volumeRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Test whole original circle joint mode and IR Higgs normalizationRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Test original O1 mode covariance against whole Higgs-law classRead result
  • open: Reconstruct original localization from the whole process
  • Resolved in scope: Test bare native-code word compression against actual localityRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Decide original geometric local-time class and execute actual interval readerRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute actual regional two-face partner and supported charged wordRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute original color marginal, modular field law and complete class readerRead resultRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Reconstruct common Higgs law from whole original quarter source towerRead resultRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute original record action on Doily and ordered whole source responseRead resultRead resultRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Locally implement original record process and test unchanged exterior sourceRead resultRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute original elliptic insertion,whole source and causal responseRead resultRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Evaluate actual joint Higgs and color group sourceRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute whole original graph color reader with typed original center selectorRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute original color fixed source and first inherited grading testRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute actual original color-spinor CAR four-word and complete spin-sector sewingRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Decide actual color admissibility of density operations and coordinate regionsRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute actual whole seam-operation class and two-face responseRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute entire original C6 word expansion with source amplitudeRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute original collective Higgs force source and entire mean dualRead resultRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute original all-mode force with actual time and whole sourceRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute original local space/time force source and causal liftRead resultRead result
Origin reverse selection, field dictionary and original P1 kernel

What does reverse selection of P1/P2 give for concrete local fields and multi-field responses, and which identification with the original P1 kernel has actually been proved?

Observable reality: minimal conditions and counterworlds

Which operational conditions are independently required, which inequivalent models satisfy them, and which observable distinctions remain for selection?

Formal carrier core: unbounded Pascal uniqueness and finite glue

Which carrier and glue statements are already present in the papers and Lean sources, and which physical selection does not follow?

  • Resolved in scope: Classify the unbounded Pascal proofRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Classify the formal finite glue scopeRead result
Active mathematical program: marked seam monodromies and lattice lifts

Which marked seam/lattice transport geometries, lift classes and local-coefficient invariants arise from existing clock/reflection/quartic data? First complete case: sign lifts of fourJ representation on CP1 minusμ4.

  • Resolved in scope: Define marked seam category and factor formulaRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Completely classify quarter-clock four-puncture liftsRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Determine central class and all subgroup restrictionsRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Determine full G0 cocycle and classRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Determine native4/5/6local cohomologyRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Classify unrestricted G31 reflection monodromiesRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Determine lift class beyond G0Read result
  • open: Classify additional reflection/clock equivariance and mapping-class quotients
  • Resolved in scope: Equivariant lifting and divisibility by eightRead result
  • Resolved in scope: All62clock obstructions and central transport variantsRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Actual group comparison and central pushout exclusionRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Complete invariants and explicit collisionsRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Compare E6 and E7 slices with the actual quarter clockRead resultRead resultRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Classify original character-valued G31monodromy liftsRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Determine E7-pair action on all original lattice fieldsRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Completely connect E6/E7 cuts to the original compilerRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Compare common covers and actual clock carriersRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Prove shared representation consequence for48,4/3 and5/4Read result
  • Resolved in scope: Completely decide joint compiler-field-cover constructionRead resultRead resultRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Reconstruct canonical local compiler field source from C4Read resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Eliminate redundant sector and multiplicity assumptionsRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Classify native equivariant markingsRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Classify pure quarter clock mapping class quotientRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Determine complete cut algebra and lossless tetrahedron transformRead resultRead resultRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Completely compare scalar glue and actual native compiler classRead resultRead resultRead resultRead result
Common clock sectors, quartic geometry and operational reconstruction

Which previously separate data of the original TFPT core follow from a common clock and representation geometry, and which complete finite measurement classification follows without asserting physical source selection?