Skip to main content
Back to the knowledge atlas

Original claim records.

The original technical record remains available here. For explanations, reviewed conclusions and the history of research questions, start with the knowledge atlas.

Research snapshot 2026-11-02 · 783 active ledger claims · 710 scientific findings · 707 registered scripts. These are different inventories, not counts of independent physical confirmations.

What does this inventory cover?

Every one of the 783 active ledger IDs is included. All 788 ledger rows, including superseded rows, remain in the download. The reviewed research corpus contains 711 findings; 1 administrative record is excluded from public scientific content, with the omission recorded in the coverage file.

The scientific findings include 519 established scoped results, 63 conditional results and 128 scoped exclusions. These labels describe the recorded finding. They do not upgrade its parent physical goal or overwrite the original ledger.

Sources were matched to their recorded hashes and line ranges at this snapshot. Bounded text excerpts make sources available even when a source is not in the earlier public release. Any omitted administrative lines are explicitly marked. This is source coverage, not a new execution of Python, Lean or Wolfram proofs.

Atlas revision 2c1b559b738e5740ecfad8e6 · snapshot SHA256 68c2fe33ce86d45a99a8c21b1e731e40749d0accb3ae69be53d198cd7ebcb48e

1493 matching records · page 19 of 75

Original ledger status

SCALE.OVERDET.01

SCALE.OVERDET.01

THE SINGLE MASS ANCHOR IS OVER-DETERMINED; NO DERIVABLE ABSOLUTE SCALE IS A THEOREM (2026-06-18): sharpens the No-Unit theorem (v153). [E] one anchor: every dimensionful output is a pure number x M_bar^d (rho_Lambda/M_bar^4 = (3/4 pi^2) e^{-2 alpha^-1} = 7.13e-121 v60/v7, M_scal/M_bar = c3^{7/2} v7, the whole mass spectrum); the absolute neutrino scale (v272) and v_geo are the SAME anchor. [N] OVER-DETERMINATION: two independent routes to M_bar agree -- Route 1 (gravity) M_bar = (8 pi G)^{-1/2} = 2.4353e18 GeV; Route 2 (cosmology) invert the compiler prediction rho_Lambda/M_bar^4 with the measured rho_Lambda^{1/4} = 2.24 meV -> M_bar = 2.438e18 GeV, agreeing to 0.11%. [E] the anchor is the gravitational unit (G), the one measured dimensionful input of all physics (modern SI fixes hbar, c exactly). [E] THEOREM not gap: the seam is a conformal c=8 chiral CFT (v157/v158), scale-invariant by construction so provably no intrinsic scale; the scale is gravitational, entering only through the ambient measure (QG.AMB.01). [A] TFPT is scale-complete up to one over-determined anchor (the Planck mass) -- maximal predictivity for a dimensionless compiler, not a missing derivation.

Recorded status: Identity [E] + over-determination [N] + re-typing [A]

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: [E] one anchor + the conformal-seam reason; [N] the two-route over-determination (gravity vs dark energy, 0.11%); [A] the re-typing of v_geo to an over-determined anchor = the Planck mass. Sharpens v153/v78.

Dependencies: ANCHOR.VGEO.02; COSMO.LAM.01; QG.AMB.01; FLAV.NUSCALE.01

Scripts: v274_scale_overdetermination.py

Location: tfpt_4_frontier

Original CSV, line 367

Original ledger status

QGAMB.ROADMAP.01

QGAMB.ROADMAP.01

OBLIGATION ROADMAP FOR QG.AMB.01 (the ambient nonperturbative QG measure), CONSOLIDATED INTO ONE MODULE (2026-06-18; QG.AMB.01 since reclassified as a DECOUPLED general QG problem, NOT a TFPT gate, v335): the (now decoupled, non-TFPT) general QG problem had no module of its own; this gives it one without claiming closure. [E] Tier A gap decoupling: Delta_eff = 6 log(3/2) - 2*248 c3^2 = 2.433 - 0.785 = 1.648 > 0 (v36/v76), so every testable low-energy readout (masses, mixings, alpha^-1, R+R^2) is independent of the un-built ambient measure -- QG.AMB.01 is gap-decoupled, not a blocker. [E]/[P] Tier B boundary-net reduction: the ambient bulk measure reduces to identifying the seam-Calderon boundary measure with the holomorphic (E8)_1 conformal net (c = 248/31 = 8 = rank E8; v77/GATE.METRIC.03), the gap giving clustering -> tightness; residual = the constructive seam-Calderon -> (E8)_1 map + bulk reconstruction (REDTEAM.A.01: reduced, not closed). [C] the perturbative layer is in hand (S_pert EG-constructible v269 + one-loop numbers v271/v273). [O] the nonperturbative interacting ambient measure (the bulk path integral / projective limit) is NOT constructed -- the one genuine structural frontier. [X] QG.AMB.01 closes IFF the seam net is identified with (E8)_1 AND the bulk reconstruction is proved; a proof that the seam net is NOT (E8)_1 or that the gap fails (Delta_eff<=0) kills the reduction.

Recorded status: Roadmap [E]/[C] + [O] open core + [X] promotion/kill

Later scope correction: the DtN form estimate alone does not prove the transfer gap.

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: [E] Tier A decoupling + the c=8 boundary-net facts; [C] the perturbative layer; [O] the nonperturbative ambient measure stays open; [X] the promotion/kill condition. A consolidation/roadmap that gives the QG.AMB.01 gate a module -- it does not close it.

Dependencies: QG.AMB.01; QG.GAPDEC.01; GATE.METRIC.03; QFT4D.SPERT.01

Scripts: v275_qgamb_roadmap.py

Location: tfpt_4_frontier

Original CSV, line 368

Original ledger status

REDTEAM.F.01

REDTEAM.F.01

RED TEAM Target F -- adversarial audit of the perturbative 4D-QFT + scale round (v269-v275), published in release 5.2. TWO attacks land and force a narrowing (now folded into v269/v274); the rest survive as typed. (1) GRAVITY S_pert NON-UNITARY: power-counting renormalizability is not unitarity -- the spectral-action R^2/Weyl^2 sector gives a 4-derivative propagator 1/(p^2(p^2+M^2)) whose massive spin-2 mode has a NEGATIVE residue (the Stelle ghost), so S_pert is unitary for the matter+gauge sector only; the gravity perturbative S-matrix carries the ghost, which is exactly why the nonperturbative QG.AMB.01 (asymptotic safety v207 / boundary (E8)_1 net) is the real frontier, not a new gap. (2) OVER-DETERMINATION CONDITIONAL: v274 Route-2 inverts rho_Lambda/M_bar^4=(3/4pi^2)e^{-2 alpha^-1} = LAMBDA.BRANCH.01 [C], so the 0.11% gravity-vs-cosmology agreement is conditional on the Lambda-branch (the gravity route is unconditional). Already-honest: J_PMNS (v270) inherits delta's [C] provenance (assembled mu6/triality phase, not an M_nu output); the nu-scale (v272) is [O] with the NO floor Sigma m_nu=0.0586 eV as the one kill test. FIREWALL HOLDS: no positive-claim doc carries an unscoped overclaim (the red-team paper itself is excluded as it quotes forbidden phrases to forbid them). Verdict: SURVIVES (narrowed).

Recorded status: Red-team [P] (survives, narrowed)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: Red-team verdict: the v269-v275 round survives as typed; two narrowings folded into v269 (gravity-sector Stelle ghost -> S_pert unitary for matter+gauge only) and v274 (over-determination conditional on the Lambda-branch). The perturbative gravity ghost IS the QG.AMB.01 frontier.

Dependencies: QFT4D.SPERT.01; QFT4D.SPERT.02; QFT4D.SPERT.03; FLAV.PMNS.03; FLAV.NUSCALE.01; SCALE.OVERDET.01; QGAMB.ROADMAP.01

Scripts: redteam/rt_F_qft4d.py

Location: tfpt_5_redteam

Original CSV, line 369

Original ledger status

QGEO.SYM.03

QGEO.SYM.03

FLAT PILLOWCASE CLOSES THE MODULAR COMMUTATOR TO ALL ORDERS (2026-06-18): collapses the bedrock QGEO.SYM.01 to ONE geometric postulate (does NOT prove the premise). For a quasi-free seam state QGEO.SYM.01 = (omega o rho = omega) <=> [rho,C]=0 <=> [rho,H]=0 (C=(1+e^H)^-1, v258). [E] ISOMETRY=>COMMUTATOR: if H=f(Delta_flat) (the DtN of a flat metric, no curvature corrections) and the order-4 deck rho (z->iz) is a flat-tau=i isometry, then [rho,Delta]=0 => [rho,H]=[rho,f(Delta)]=0 EXACTLY to all orders -- verified numerically on the discretised square torus (rho^4=I, [rho,Delta]=0, [rho,sqrt(-Delta)]=0; a generic non-isometry permutation fails). [E] this UPGRADES the leading-order results v198 (principal symbol |k| commutes) and v201 (subprincipal block-diagonal) to the FULL operator H. [C] tau=i is forced by the order-4 requirement (cross-ratio 2 <=> j=1728, the unique order-4 CM by Z[i]; hexagonal tau=omega has j=0, order-6, excluded; v214/v267). [O] QGEO.SYM.01 therefore collapses to the single geometric statement 'the raw RP seam state is the flat tau=i pillowcase quasi-free state (H=sqrt(-Delta_flat))' -- everything downstream [E]; this one statement is the bedrock, needs a human constructive-QFT proof or stays an honest axiom. Sharpest non-circular form.

Recorded status: Reduction [E] (flat => commutator all orders) + [C] (tau=i forced) + [O] (one geometric postulate)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: [E] the isometry=>commutator closure (numerically verified, all orders) + the all-orders upgrade of v198/v201; [C] tau=i forced by order-4; [O] the one geometric postulate (raw seam = flat tau=i pillowcase) stays open. Narrows QGEO.SYM.01 to a single flat-geometry statement; does NOT close it.

Dependencies: QGEO.SYM.01; QGEO.SYM.02; QGEO.MODULAR.01; QGEO.SUBPRIN.01; QGEO.PILLOW.01; PS.DIRAC.03

Scripts: v276_qgeo_flat_closes_commutator.py

Location: tfpt_research_contracts

Original CSV, line 370

Original ledger status

QGAMB.TIERB.01

QGAMB.TIERB.01

SEAM-CALDERON -> (E8)_1 MATCHING CERTIFICATE (2026-06-18): the concrete Tier-B step of QG.AMB.01 (v275) -- computes the full (E8)_1 matching target and pins the residual to ONE bit (does NOT close it; the rt_A 'reduced, not closed' verdict stands). [E] c=8 (Sugawara, c((E8)_1)=248/31=8=g_car+N_fam), matching the seam (v77), but c=8 alone does not pin the net. [E] THE DISCRIMINATOR IS HOLOMORPHY: det Cartan(E8)=1 (one primary/anyon, holomorphic) vs the c=8 counterexample det Cartan(D8=SO(16))=4 (four primaries 1,v,s,c, non-holomorphic) -- same c, different det, so the single discriminator is |det K|=1. [E] THE (E8)_1 CHARACTER: the unique holomorphic c=8 character E4/eta^8=j^{1/3}=q^{-1/3}(1+248q+4124q^2+...) has a SINGLE primary and exactly 248=dim E8 weight-1 currents (the affine E8 current algebra; 240 roots from Theta_E8=E4). [E] EQUIVALENCE CHAIN (v234/v235): holomorphic <=> det Cartan 1 <=> E8 the unique even unimodular rank-8 lattice (v83) <=> seam link a homology 3-sphere (|Gamma^ab|=1) <=> |det K|=1 (Chern-Simons) -- all Tier-B faces are ONE condition. [C] SEAM-SIDE MATCH: the seam is pinned to the flat tau=i pillowcase (v276) and one Kummer/K3 carries seam+carrier-16+E8 (v260), so the boundary chiral data matches (E8)_1 on every computable invariant. [O] RESIDUAL = the single holomorphy bit (det K=1 / mu-index 1 / single sector); reduced to one bit, NOT closed.

Recorded status: Reduction [E] (full (E8)_1 match + discriminator) + [C] (seam-side) + [O] (one holomorphy bit)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: [E] the full (E8)_1 matching target (c=8, det 1, 248 currents, single primary) + the explicit D8 counterexample isolating holomorphy as THE discriminator; [C] the seam-side match via v276/v260; [O] the single holomorphy bit stays open. Reduces QG.AMB.01 Tier-B to one checkable condition; does NOT close it.

Dependencies: QGAMB.ROADMAP.01; GATE.METRIC.03; REDTEAM.A.01; QGEO.SYM.03; ARCH.K3.01; GATE.HOLO.02

Scripts: v277_seam_calderon_e8_match.py

Location: tfpt_4_frontier

Original CSV, line 371

Original ledger status

QFT4D.SPERT.04

QFT4D.SPERT.04

S_pert -> S_phys LSZ BRIDGE + ONE-LOOP UNITARITY (2026-06-18): connects the EG perturbative S-matrix (v269/v271/v273) to the physical asymptotic S-matrix (S_phys = LSZ on the OS-reconstructed Wightman functions, v240); the three-layer S-matrix is now S_top (v243) | S_pert (v269) --LSZ--> S_phys (v240). [E] LSZ BRIDGE: S_phys matrix elements = (amputate external legs)(on-shell residue sqrt(Z)) of the connected time-ordered correlators, and the EG time-ordered products of S_pert ARE those correlators (the OS Wick-rotation of the seam Wightman functions), so the perturbative amplitudes feed S_phys. [C] MASS GAP: Delta=6log(3/2)>0 (v64/v240) gives isolated one-particle states, so Haag-Ruelle scattering theory constructs the in/out asymptotic states and LSZ is valid. [E] ONE-LOOP UNITARITY (optical theorem): the s-channel one-loop bubble B(s)=int_0^1 dx ln(m^2-x(1-x)s-i eps) has discontinuity Im B(s)/pi = x_+ - x_- = sqrt(1-4m^2/s) for s>4m^2 EXACTLY -- the two-body phase-space factor -- so 2 Im M = sum_int dPi |M|^2 (cutting rule) holds at one loop: S_pert is unitary order by order for the matter+gauge sector. [E] THRESHOLD: Im B=0 for s<4m^2, turning on exactly at the physical two-particle threshold s=4m^2 (no spurious thresholds). [O] GRAVITY CAVEAT (rt_F): the R^2/Weyl^2 gravity sector has a negative-residue massive spin-2 mode (the Stelle ghost), so the gravity perturbative S-matrix is NOT unitary -- S_phys for gravity is the nonperturbative QG.AMB.01 frontier. [C] FIELD-STRENGTH Z: the EG scheme gives finite Z so the LSZ reduction is well-defined.

Recorded status: Bridge [E] (LSZ structure + one-loop optical theorem) + [C] (gap/Z) + [O] (gravity ghost)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: [E] the LSZ bridge structure + the one-loop optical theorem (exact: cut = two-body phase space) + the threshold analyticity; [C] the gap->asymptotic-states link + finite Z; [O] the gravity ghost (-> QG.AMB.01). Connects S_pert to S_phys and verifies one-loop unitarity for matter+gauge.

Dependencies: QFT4D.SPERT.01; QFT4D.SPERT.02; DYN.GNS.01; DHR.SMATRIX.01; REDTEAM.F.01

Scripts: v278_lsz_bridge_unitarity.py

Location: tfpt_research_contracts

Original CSV, line 372

Original ledger status

QGEO.OBLIG.01

QGEO.OBLIG.01

QGEO.SYM.01 AS ONE PRECISE CONSTRUCTIVE-QFT LEMMA + PROOF-TREE COMPLETENESS (2026-06-18): the formal write-up of the one human math obligation (does NOT close it). LEMMA (constructive-QFT form): let Sigma = P^1 minus mu_4 carry the free c=8 RP/OS quasi-free state omega_Sigma with DtN Lambda_Sigma; PREMISE (the one open input, QGEO.SYM.01): the raw seam carries the FLAT tau=i pillowcase metric g_flat (the Troyanov-unique constant-curvature representative, cone angles pi, of the conformal class fixed by the order-4 deck), so Lambda_Sigma = sqrt(-Delta_{g_flat}); CONCLUSION: omega_Sigma o rho = omega_Sigma (the carrier clock is a symmetry of the seam STATE) -> mark-locality -> metric-sector inclusion -> E8. [E] PROOF-TREE COMPLETENESS: the reduction DAG from 'free RP seam' (v155/v175 -> marks v195/v216 -> conformal class tau=i v214/v267 -> Troyanov flat -> commutator all orders v276/Lean -> state-invariance v198/v201/SeamDeckClosure -> mark-locality v210/v264 -> E8 v154/v277) has EXACTLY ONE un-discharged leaf: 'the raw seam state IS the flat g_flat state' (Lambda_Sigma = sqrt(-Delta_flat)). [E] the GEOMETRIC SIDE is fixed (flat DtN diagonal in Fourier modes, rho commutes with any spectral function to all orders, Lean FORM.QGEO.04), so the obligation is STATE-IDENTIFICATION not geometric ambiguity. [C] two proof routes: (i) RP-state uniqueness on the flat tau=i orbifold, (ii) Troyanov + OS reconstruction. [O] one constructive-QFT statement closes QGEO.SYM.01.

Recorded status: Obligation lemma [E] (proof-tree complete) + [C] (routes) + [O] (one residual)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: [E] the precise lemma + proof-tree completeness (exactly one open leaf) + the fixed geometric side; [C] the two proof routes; [F] the all-orders step in Lean; [O] the one constructive-QFT residual. The formal obligation write-up; does NOT close QGEO.SYM.01.

Dependencies: QGEO.SYM.01; QGEO.SYM.02; QGEO.SYM.03; FORM.QGEO.04; QGEO.MARKLOCAL.01; QGEO.PILLOW.01

Scripts: v279_qgeo_obligation_lemma.py

Location: tfpt_research_contracts

Original CSV, line 373

Original ledger status

FORM.QGEO.04

FORM.QGEO.04

FLAT-METRIC ALL-ORDERS CLOSURE FORMALISED IN LEAN (2026-06-18): TfptCarrier/SeamDeckClosure.lean (theorems diagonal_commutesClock, flat_all_orders_clock) machine-proves the v276 all-orders step -- any SPECTRAL FUNCTION g of the Fourier-diagonal flat Laplacian (specFun g d) commutes with the carrier clock rho=diag(i^n) (CommutesClock), i.e. given the flat tau=i metric the DtN modular Hamiltonian H=g(Delta_flat) is clock-invariant to ALL orders, not merely the principal (v198) and sub-principal (v201) orders. Upgrades the conditional block-diagonality (markLocal_blockDiagonal / SeamDeckPremise.clock_invariant) to the full operator. Only the standard axioms {propext, Classical.choice, Quot.sound}, no sorry; full lake build green (3356 jobs), listed in AxiomCheck.lean. The premise (the seam IS flat) stays the [O] QGEO.SYM.01 input. QA NOTE (2026-08-08, round 36, v878_ledger_integrity.py): claim_id RENAMED FORM.QGEO.03 -> FORM.QGEO.04 -- the id FORM.QGEO.03 was double-booked on 2026-06-18 (it had been assigned to the CohomologyGrading formalisation on 2026-06-15): a primary-key violation found by the round-36 ledger audit; every flat-closure reference (papers, scripts, registry, website) updated to FORM.QGEO.04; the CohomologyGrading row keeps FORM.QGEO.03. The claim content is UNCHANGED.

Recorded status: Formal [F] (Lean theorem, all-orders closure)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: Formal [F]: the v276 flat-metric all-orders commutator closure is a Lean theorem (SeamDeckClosure.flat_all_orders_clock), standard axioms only, no sorry, full build green.

Dependencies: FORM.QGEO.01; FORM.QGEO.02; QGEO.SYM.03

Scripts: lean4-carrier-rigidity

Location: tfpt_research_contracts

Original CSV, line 374

Original ledger status

QGEO.STEKLOV.01

QGEO.STEKLOV.01

FLAT tau=i PILLOWCASE DtN EXPERIMENT (2026-06-18): a direct numerical experiment on the actual seam orbifold, realising the QGEO chain on the geometric side (does NOT prove the premise). [E] the pillowcase = the Z2-even sector of the flat torus T^2=C/(Z+iZ) modulo z->-z; the 4 cone points are the 2-torsion fixed points (deficit pi each, sum 4pi=2pi*2 Gauss-Bonnet). [E] the order-4 deck rho (z->iz) descends to the pillowcase ([rho,Z2]=[rho,P_even]=0) and permutes the 4 cone points as 2 fixed + 1 swapped pair (the order-4 mark structure). [E] the geometric chain is numerically EXACT: [rho,Delta]=0 => [rho,H]=0 (H=sqrt(-Delta)) => [rho,C]=0 (C=(1+e^H)^-1) => omega o rho = omega -- the v276/v279 all-orders closure realised on the real orbifold. [C] the Steklov/DtN is positive self-adjoint, fixed by the flat metric alone (numerical evidence for QGEO.OBLIG.01 route (i), RP-state uniqueness). [O] confirms the conclusion GIVEN the flat geometry; the premise (the raw seam state IS this flat pillowcase state) stays the one open QGEO.SYM.01 input.

Recorded status: Numerical experiment [E] (geometric chain) + [C] (RP-state) + [O] (premise)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: [E] the pillowcase orbifold + order-4 orbit + the exact geometric chain omega o rho = omega numerically realised; [C] the RP-state is metric-determined (route-(i) evidence); [O] the premise stays open. A self-investigable numerical experiment on the real flat tau=i pillowcase.

Dependencies: QGEO.SYM.01; QGEO.SYM.03; QGEO.OBLIG.01; QGEO.PILLOW.01; QGEO.MARKS.03

Scripts: v280_pillowcase_steklov.py

Location: tfpt_research_contracts

Original CSV, line 375

Original ledger status

QGAMB.MODULAR.01

QGAMB.MODULAR.01

MODULAR-DATA / ANYON-CONDENSATION LAYER OF THE Tier-B HOLOMORPHY BIT (2026-06-18): complements v277 (det+character) with the anyon/modular-data view. [E] #anyons = |det Gram|: E8 -> 1 (holomorphic, single sector), D8=SO(16)_1 -> 4 (anyons 1,v,s,c), carrier D5(+)A3 -> det(D5)*det(A3)=4*4=16. [E] the anyon-condensation tower D5(+)A3 (det 16) -> D8 (det 4) -> E8 (det 1), each step condensing a Lagrangian Z2 boson (|det|/4=2^2 per step), the Kitaev E8 quantum-Hall endpoint (v92/v235). [E] Gauss-Milgram for the D8 anyons (topological spins 0,1/2,1,1): (1/sqrt|A|) sum_a e^{2pi i h_a} = e^{2pi i c/8} recovers c=8 mod 8 (the chiral central charge = the modular anomaly). [E] E8 is the unique holomorphic c=8 net (1 anyon <=> det 1 <=> even unimodular rank-8 = E8); SO(16)_1 has the SAME c=8 but 4 anyons, so holomorphy (det 1) is THE discriminator (matches v277). [O] the open Tier-B bit: does the seam-Calderon net condense to the det-1 holomorphic endpoint (|det K|=1)? Reduced to one bit, not closed.

Recorded status: Reduction [E] (modular data + condensation tower + Gauss-Milgram) + [O] (one bit)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: [E] #anyons=|det Gram| + the condensation tower 16->4->1 + Gauss-Milgram c=8 + E8 the unique holomorphic point; [O] the single holomorphy bit. The modular-data view of QG.AMB.01 Tier-B; complements v277. Exact core mirrored in Wolfram.

Dependencies: QGAMB.TIERB.01; GATE.HOLO.02; QGAMB.ROADMAP.01; E8.GLU.01

Scripts: v281_holomorphy_modular_data.py

Location: tfpt_4_frontier

Original CSV, line 376

Original ledger status

QGAMB.UNIFY.01

QGAMB.UNIFY.01

THE E8-AT-tau=i UNIFICATION: TWO OBLIGATIONS -> ONE OBJECT (2026-06-18): the candidate simplification. The (E8)_1 character as a modular function of the seam torus modulus tau is chi_E8(tau)=Theta_E8/eta^8=E4/eta^8=j(tau)^{1/3} (since j=E4^3/eta^24=(E4/eta^8)^3=chi_E8^3). [E] tau=i is the order-4 CM point (cross-ratio 2 <=> j=1728 <=> tau=i, unique order-4 CM by Z[i], v214/v267) -- the flat tau=i pillowcase geometry of QGEO.SYM.01. [E] chi_E8 = j^{1/3} (verified chi^3 = q*j as a q-series), so chi_E8(i)=1728^{1/3}=12 -- the (E8)_1 partition function at the SAME modulus tau=i, the holomorphy of QG.AMB.01. [E] ONE OBJECT, TWO FACES: tau=i is simultaneously the order-4 conformal CM point (QGEO.SYM.01, flat geometry) and the modulus at which the holomorphic (E8)_1 character is the seam partition function (QG.AMB.01, holomorphy). [C] OBLIGATION COUNT 2->1: prove the single statement 'the raw seam state is the (E8)_1 holomorphic CFT at tau=i' and BOTH QGEO.SYM.01 (flat tau=i, order-4 CM) AND QG.AMB.01 (E8 holomorphic, det K=1) follow -- the flat geometry IS the CM modulus, the holomorphy IS the E8 algebra. [O] the single unified premise stays open (it IS the seam-identification) but is now ONE object, not two separate premises -- a genuine reduction of the open count, not a closure.

Recorded status: Unification [E] (chi_E8=j^{1/3}, tau=i shared) + [C] (count 2->1) + [O] (one premise)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: [E] tau=i the order-4 CM point + chi_E8=j^{1/3} (chi_E8(i)=12) + the one-object identification; [C] the obligation count drops 2->1; [O] the single unified premise stays open. The candidate simplification of the two math obligations. Exact core mirrored in Wolfram.

Dependencies: QGEO.SYM.03; QGEO.OBLIG.01; QGAMB.TIERB.01; QGAMB.MODULAR.01; QGEO.PILLOW.01

Scripts: v282_e8_tau_i_unification.py

Location: tfpt_research_contracts

Original CSV, line 377

Original ledger status

PRED.LIVE.01

PRED.LIVE.01

LIVE KILL-TEST SCORECARD OF THE RECENT ROUND'S COMPUTABLE PREDICTIONS (2026-06-18): a data-confrontation consolidation (confronts, does not add physics), each row tagged with the decisive near-term experiment. [N] PMNS angles: sin^2 th12=1/3-phi0/2=0.30675 vs NuFIT 0.303(12) [+0.31 sigma]; sin^2 th13=phi0 e^{-5/6}=0.02311 vs 0.02225(59) [+1.45 sigma]; sin^2 th23=0.5 maximal (octant-ambiguous) -- decisive JUNO/Daya-Bay/DUNE. [C] leptonic CP: J_PMNS=-0.0297 (J_max 0.0342 vs NuFIT 0.0332 ~3%), delta=240 vs NuFIT ~232(30) -- decisive DUNE/Hyper-K. [X] Sigma m_nu NO floor=0.0586 eV vs Planck+BAO<0.12, DESI~<0.072 (consistent at the edge; Sigma<0.0586 excludes the NO m1~0 spectrum) -- decisive DESI/CMB-S4. [X] proton decay tau_p(p->e+pi0)=1.55e35 yr for the E8-allowed +(15,1,1) content vs Super-K>2.4e34 (safe); minimal 16-Higgs 4.4e33 EXCLUDED -- decisive Hyper-Kamiokande (reach ~1.4e35). [N] closed readouts alpha^-1=137.0359992 (1.9 sigma known offset), Omega_b=(1-1/4pi)phi0=0.04894, birefringence beta=phi0/(4pi)=0.2424 deg -- decisive CMB birefringence. [N] all confronted rows consistent < 2 sigma; 2 sharp near-term kill tests (Sigma m_nu floor, proton decay).

Recorded status: Data confrontation [N]/[C] + [X] (two near-term kill tests)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: [N]/[C] data confrontation (pulls vs current bounds) + [X] the two sharp near-term kill tests. A consolidation/scorecard, not new physics.

Dependencies: FLAV.TH13.01; FLAV.PMNS.03; FLAV.NUSCALE.01; PS.PROTON.02; EM.FP.01

Scripts: v283_live_killtest_scorecard.py

Location: tfpt_4_frontier

Original CSV, line 378

Original ledger status

QGEO.ROUTEI.01

QGEO.ROUTEI.01

ROUTE (i) (RP-STATE UNIQUENESS) LEMMA DECOMPOSITION (2026-06-18): turns Route (i) from one hard target into a 6-lemma chain with 5 lemmas discharged [E]/[F] and exactly one open lemma isolated (does NOT prove the open premise). L1 [E] RP data define the raw DtN intrinsically (v194 QGEO.DTN.01, OS on the quasi-free state). L2 [E] the four branch marks force the pillowcase conformal class (v195 QGEO.MARKS.02 Lefschetz/character + v216 QGEO.MARKS.03 n=2chi=4 + v214 QGEO.PILLOW.01). L3 [E] the flat orbifold Steklov/DtN operator = sqrt(-Delta_flat): the DtN principal symbol is |xi|=sqrt(-Delta_bdry) (Lee-Uhlmann) with no curvature correction for a flat metric (flat-strip DtN(k)/k->1; v280). L4 [E] the quasi-free covariance is determined by the DtN, C=(1+e^H)^-1 with H=log-DtN (v258 PS.DIRAC.03). L5 [E]/[F] mu4-invariance follows: [rho,Delta]=0 => [rho,H]=0 => [rho,C]=0 => omega o rho = omega (v276 QGEO.SYM.03 + Lean FORM.QGEO.04 + v280). TROYANOV REDUCTION [C]: 4 cone points of angle pi => chi_orb = 2-4(1-1/2) = 0 => the unique constant-curvature representative is flat = the tau=i square (j=1728), so the residual reduces to 'the raw seam is the constant-curvature geometric state'. THE ONE OPEN LEMMA [O]: the raw RP seam state is the constant-curvature/geometric state (Lambda = sqrt(-Delta_g) for constant-curvature g) -- the state-identification theory-selection step; proving it closes Route (i).

Recorded status: Lemma decomposition [E] (5/6 discharged) + [C] (Troyanov) + [O] (one open lemma)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: [E] 5/6 Route-(i) lemmas discharged + the L3 flat-DtN verification; [C] the Troyanov reduction (constant curvature -> flat tau=i); [O] the one constant-curvature/geometric-state lemma. Decomposes Route (i) and isolates its single open lemma; does NOT close it.

Dependencies: QGEO.SYM.01; QGEO.OBLIG.01; QGEO.DTN.01; QGEO.MARKS.03; PS.DIRAC.03; QGEO.SYM.03; QGEO.STEKLOV.01

Scripts: v284_route_i_rp_uniqueness.py

Location: tfpt_research_contracts

Original CSV, line 379

Original ledger status

QGAMB.ROUTEII.01

QGAMB.ROUTEII.01

ROUTE (ii) (SEAM-NET CONDENSATION) LEMMA DECOMPOSITION + ROUTE-COINCIDENCE (2026-06-18): a 4-lemma chain with 3 discharged and the open lemma shown to COINCIDE with Route (i)'s (the v282 unification at the lemma level; does NOT prove the open premise). M1 [E] no nontrivial abelian sector <=> |det K|=1 <=> holomorphic (mu-index 1) (v234 GATE.HOLO.01: #(1-dim irreps)=|Gamma^ab|=|H1|=1 <=> E8; v235 GATE.HOLO.02 Chern-Simons det K=1). M2 [E] holomorphic c=8 <=> (E8)_1 the unique even unimodular rank-8 lattice; the c=8 counterexample SO(16)_1 has |det|=4 (v277 QGAMB.TIERB.01 + v281 QGAMB.MODULAR.01 #anyons=|det Gram|). M3 [E] the condensation tower D5(+)A3 (det 16) -> D8 (4) -> E8 (1) is the unique mu4-Lagrangian glue (v92 GATE.METRIC.07 + v281 + v235). THE DISCRIMINATOR [E]: det 1 (E8, holomorphic) vs det 4 (SO(16)) at the same c=8. ROUTE COINCIDENCE [E]: Route (i)'s L_open ('raw seam = constant-curvature flat tau=i state', v284) and Route (ii)'s M_open ('the free RP seam condenses the mu4-Lagrangian glue' = QGEO.SYM.01) are the SAME lemma -- both 'the raw seam IS the (E8)_1-at-tau=i object' (v282); proving EITHER route closes BOTH. THE UNIFIED OPEN LEMMA [O]: construct a canonical equivalence between the raw seam KMS/DtN state and the holomorphic (E8)_1 net at tau=i -- the state-identification step.

Recorded status: Lemma decomposition [E] (3/4 discharged + route coincidence) + [O] (unified lemma)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: [E] 3/4 Route-(ii) lemmas discharged + the discriminator + the route-(i)/(ii) coincidence; [O] the unified open lemma (canonical seam<->(E8)_1 equivalence). Decomposes Route (ii), isolates its single open lemma, and shows it coincides with Route (i)'s -- confirming v282 at the lemma level. Does NOT close it.

Dependencies: QGEO.SYM.01; GATE.HOLO.01; GATE.HOLO.02; QGAMB.TIERB.01; QGAMB.MODULAR.01; QGAMB.UNIFY.01; QGEO.ROUTEI.01

Scripts: v285_route_ii_seam_condensation.py

Location: tfpt_research_contracts

Original CSV, line 380

Original ledger status

SEAM.EQUIV.01

SEAM.EQUIV.01

THE SEAM EQUIVALENCE CONTRACT (2026-06-18): concentrates the whole open structure on ONE named arrow (does NOT prove it). THE NAMED THEOREM: the raw reflection-positive seam state (gap, chirality, carrier clock) reconstructs canonically the SAME state as the holomorphic (E8)_1 boundary net at the tau=i pillowcase, respecting the DtN, KMS modular flow, mu4 deck, Q-system extension, det K=1 and the (E8)_1 character (short: the raw seam is (E8)_1 at tau=i). [E] four objects (RawRPSeam, FlatTauIPillowcaseDtN, HolomorphicE8Net, SREKitaevE8Phase). [E] six arrows: 2 closed (Route i: FlatDtN->omega o rho=omega, v276/v280/v284; Route ii: SRE->HolomorphicE8Net, v235/v277/v281), 1 conditional (FlatDtN<->HolomorphicE8Net at tau=i, v282), 2 open premises (RawRPSeam->FlatDtN and RawRPSeam->SRE, the SAME lemma per v284/v285), 1 Gral (RawRPSeam->HolomorphicE8Net = SEAM.EQUIV.01). [E] IMPORT FIREWALL (anti-circularity): no Route-i module (v276/v280/v284) imports any Route-ii module (v277/v281/v285) or vice versa, verified by scanning the sources -- the routes converge ONLY through this contract, killing the 'E8 smuggled into the geometry and pulled back out' attack. [E] exact-label taxonomy {Formal Exact (Lean), Numerical Exact (reproducible experiment), Conditional Exact (standard theorem under a stated premise), Open Selection (theory-selection premise)}. [O] the one open arrow: free Gaussian RP bulk => holomorphic single-sector boundary net. Writes seam_equivalence.json. NOT closed by this: v_geo (metrology primitive), F_transfer (downstream), QG.AMB.01 (nonperturbative ambient measure). ROUTE SPLIT (2026-07-22; ID restructuring after the external review, NO status change in substance): the target statement now carries two named routes -- SEAM.EQUIV.MMST.01 (the conditional scaling-limit route: closed modulo cited existence theorems) and SEAM.EQUIV.TWISTOR.01 (the open Costello-Li construction). PARENT LOGIC (the claim text of this row): closed if MMST.01 OR TWISTOR.01 closes; currently: MMST conditional-closed modulo cited theorems, TWISTOR open => parent stays [O] as an unconditional claim. UPDATED 2026-08-27 (v973): the route narrowing -- the MMST route's cited-theorem coverage is carved into COVERED (bilinear half) vs NOT-COVERED (the named N1-N4 list, headed by the mu4/GSO net extension), the twistor route's declared measure is unique on the computable sector up to exactly ONE named flat direction, and the two routes provably share the executable OS skeleton 5/5 with all divergences control-typed (NEW row SEAM.EQUIV.SKELETON.01 [E]) -- the open structure of the parent is now concentrated on the SAME named extension question from both sides (N1/N4 on the MMST side, the global quantisation + OS bridge on the twistor side), with the executable levels verified to agree. Parent logic unchanged: closed if MMST.01 OR TWISTOR.01 closes; both stay [O]; parent stays [O].

Recorded status: Contract [E] (typing + firewall + taxonomy) + [O] (the named theorem)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: [E] the four-object/six-arrow typing + the import firewall (routes non-circular) + the exact-label taxonomy + the single-open-arrow certificate; [O] the named Seam Equivalence Theorem stays open. A contract concentrating the open structure on one arrow; does NOT prove it. Route split 2026-07-22: closed if SEAM.EQUIV.MMST.01 OR SEAM.EQUIV.TWISTOR.01 closes; currently MMST conditional-closed modulo cited theorems, TWISTOR open => parent stays [O] as an unconditional claim.

Dependencies: QGEO.SYM.01; QGEO.OBLIG.01; QGAMB.UNIFY.01; QGEO.ROUTEI.01; QGAMB.ROUTEII.01; SEAM.EQUIV.MMST.01; SEAM.EQUIV.TWISTOR.01

Scripts: v286_seam_equivalence_contract.py

Location: tfpt_research_contracts

Original CSV, line 381

Original ledger status

SEAM.EQUIV.A01

SEAM.EQUIV.A01

ROUTE A (AQFT) DEPENDENCY CHECKER (2026-06-18): for the open Gral arrow 'free Gaussian RP bulk => holomorphic single-sector boundary net', types the 5-lemma AQFT chain and isolates the ONE missing standard theorem (does NOT prove the arrow). L1 [E] RawRPSeam --OS--> CAR/quasi-free boundary system (v155 quasi-free boundary, v160 Gaussianity from the Pfaffian, v240 GNS/OS, v175 net existence + full-cone RP). L2 [E] gap + chirality => gapped chiral bulk (gap Delta=6log(3/2)>0 v64; c=8 chiral net v156/v157). L3 [O] invertible/SRE gapped Gaussian bulk => single-sector boundary (mu-index 1) -- THE ONE MISSING STANDARD THEOREM: an invertible (SRE) gapped bulk has no bulk topological order, hence a single-sector boundary net; the AQFT form of det K=1, to be imported/proved externally. L4 [E] mu-index 1 + c=8 => holomorphic (v234 holomorphy<=>1 sector). L5 [E] holomorphic c=8 => (E8)_1 (v83/v277/v281, unique even unimodular rank-8; SO(16) the det-4 non-holomorphic counterexample). VERDICT: 4/5 lemmas discharged, so Route A reduces SEAM.EQUIV.01 to ONE cited standard theorem (invertibility => single-sector), not a diffuse programme.

Recorded status: Dependency checker [E] (4/5 discharged) + [O] (the one external theorem)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: [E] the AQFT chain typing + the four discharged steps (L1/L2/L4/L5) + the single-missing-theorem isolation (L3); [O] the one external theorem 'invertible Gaussian bulk => single-sector boundary'. A dependency checker, not a proof.

Dependencies: SEAM.EQUIV.01; QFT.NETRP.01; GATE.HOLO.01; QGAMB.TIERB.01; QGAMB.ROUTEII.01

Scripts: v287_free_rp_bulk_to_holomorphic_boundary.py

Location: tfpt_research_contracts

Original CSV, line 382

Original ledger status

SEAM.EQUIV.B01

SEAM.EQUIV.B01

ROUTE B (DtN) FULL-L^2 SUB-PRINCIPAL Z4 BLOCK-DIAGONALITY (2026-06-18): proves (numerically, on the full Toeplitz operator) the advisor's 'probably provable' step, lifting v201/v284 from the finite H^1 block to the full L^2 operator. Setup: the seam DtN Lambda = |D_theta| + M_f with <n|M_f|n'> = f_{n-n'} (boundary curvature f), rho = diag(i^n). [E] CHARACTER ORTHOGONALITY: a mark-sourced curvature f(theta)=sum_{j<4} g(theta - j pi/2) has Fourier coefficient f_m = g_m sum_{j<4}((-i)^m)^j = 4 g_m [4|m], so support ONLY on modes m==0 (mod 4) (verified nonzero modes {0,+-4,+-8,+-12}). [E] FULL-L^2 BLOCK-DIAGONALITY: on the full mode range -50..50 the Toeplitz M_f connects only equal clock-characters, so Lambda commutes with rho, ||[rho,Lambda]||~2e-15 -- the all-orders statement on L^2, lifting the finite block (v201/v284). [E] NEGATIVE CONTROL: a generic (non-mark-local) curvature gives ||[rho,Lambda]||=4.44>0. [E] LEAN CONSISTENCY: the operator form of SeamDeckClosure.geom_sum_fourth_root + markLocal_blockDiagonal. [O] THE SHARPER RESIDUAL: why is the raw seam sub-principal term mark-local (a sum of mu4-orbit sources)? -- the curvature-locality half of SEAM.EQUIV.01.

Recorded status: Reduction [E] (full-L^2 lift, lifts v201/v284) + [O] (mark-locality residual)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: [E] character orthogonality + the full-L^2 Z4 block-diagonality (lifts v201/v284 to the full operator) + the negative control + Lean consistency; [O] the one sharper residual (raw sub-principal mark-locality). Real progress on Route B; does NOT close the premise.

Dependencies: SEAM.EQUIV.01; QGEO.SUBPRIN.01; QGEO.ROUTEI.01; FORM.QGEO.04; QGEO.MODULAR.01

Scripts: v288_full_l2_subprincipal_z4.py

Location: tfpt_research_contracts

Original CSV, line 383

Original ledger status

MARKLOCAL.RAW.01

MARKLOCAL.RAW.01

RAW MARK-LOCALITY DECOMPOSITION (2026-06-18): decompose the ONE remaining Route-B residual after v288 ('why is the raw seam sub-principal term mark-local?') into an explicit 5-lemma chain, discharge the four standard/established lemmas and isolate the single open analytic lemma (Flat-Away). The best closing lever for Route B; does NOT close mark-locality. CHAIN (raw RP seam => mark-local sub-principal term): L1 [C] CONIC PARAMETRIX -- the Steklov/DtN of a conic surface splits as Lambda = |D_theta| (principal) + M_f (sub-principal = multiplication by boundary curvature f) + delta-sources at the cone points (b-calculus/conic parametrix, Melrose; imported). L2 [O] FLAT-AWAY -- THE ONE OPEN ANALYTIC LEMMA: reflection positivity + the mass gap + the four branch marks force the seam curvature to VANISH away from the four marks (the flat-pillowcase realisation, the curvature-locality heart of SEAM.EQUIV.01). L3 [E] ORBIT-SOURCE -- the four marks form a single mu4 orbit {0,pi/2,pi,3pi/2} (v195 Lefschetz/character marks + order-4 clock; v216 Gauss-Bonnet 4 cone points deficit pi). L4 [E] FOURIER-SUPPORT -- a curvature sourced on the mu4 orbit has discrete Fourier support ONLY on modes m==0 mod 4 (v264/v288; verified by FFT, with a non-orbit negative control showing the ORBIT structure, not just '4 marks', gives mark-locality). L5 [E] FULL-OPERATOR -- hence M_f is Z4 block-diagonal and [rho,Lambda]=0 on the full L^2 (v288), so omega o rho = omega (Tomita-Takesaki, v198). VERDICT: 4/5 discharged (L1 conditional-by-literature, L3/L4/L5 exact); Route B reduces to exactly L2 (Flat-Away) -- if L2 falls, Route B closes and SEAM.EQUIV.01 needs only the holomorphy half (Route A).

Recorded status: Decomposition [E] (chain + L3/L4/L5) + [C] (L1 literature) + [O] (L2 Flat-Away)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: [E] the chain typing + L3 (orbit) + L4 (Fourier support) + L5 (full operator); [C] L1 (conic parametrix, literature); [O] L2 (Flat-Away), the single open analytic lemma. A finer decomposition of the v288 residual, NOT a closure.

Dependencies: SEAM.EQUIV.B01; SEAM.EQUIV.01; QGEO.ENERGY.03; QGEO.SUBPRIN.01; FORM.QGEO.04

Scripts: v289_marklocal_raw.py

Location: tfpt_research_contracts

Original CSV, line 384

Original ledger status

SEAM.ADVERSARY.01

SEAM.ADVERSARY.01

ROUTE-B RED-TEAM: Z4 BLOCK-DIAGONALITY != MARK-LOCALITY (2026-06-18). Constructs the strongest adversary against Route B -- a SMOOTH Z4-symmetric off-mark curvature f(theta)=eps*cos(4 theta) -- and shows HONESTLY (no manufactured pass): [E] the adversary is Z4-symmetric (Fourier support only on {+-4} subset 4Z) but NOT mark-local (f(pi/4)=-eps != 0), a smooth off-mark curvature rather than a sum of mu4-orbit sources; [E] it PASSES the v288 commutator test ||[rho,Lambda_adv]||=0 EXACTLY (the same pass as a genuine mark-local curvature, since i^n - i^(n+-4)=0) -- so [rho,Lambda]=0 follows from Z4-invariance, which is WEAKER than mark-locality, and the commutator alone CANNOT exclude this modulus; [E] BUT it shifts the DtN spectrum off the flat integer ladder |n| (max |dlambda|=0.155 at eps=0.3) and the heat trace Tr(e^{-t Lambda}) (delta=0.019 at t=0.5) -- the spectral zeta/heat coefficients that fix the KMS weight beta and the (E8)_1 character. [O] VERDICT: the smooth Z4 off-mark curvature is a GENUINE candidate modulus the commutator misses but the spectral data excludes, so a proof of Flat-Away (v289 L2) must invoke spectral/RP-energy/heat-kernel constraints, not just Z4-invariance. v288 proves the commutator lift; it does NOT pin off-mark flatness -- that is exactly the open Flat-Away lemma, sharpened to 'no smooth Z4 off-mark modulus survives the spectral data'.

Recorded status: Red-team [E] (adversary passes commutator, shifts spectrum/heat) + [O] (consequence)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: [E] the adversary construction + the commutator pass + the spectrum/heat shift (the discriminators); [O] the consequence that Flat-Away must use spectral input. An honest red-team test; it does NOT manufacture a pass and sharpens (not closes) the open lemma.

Dependencies: SEAM.EQUIV.B01; MARKLOCAL.RAW.01; FLATAWAY.RP.01; QGEO.SUBPRIN.01

Scripts: v290_z4_smooth_curvature_adversary.py

Location: tfpt_research_contracts

Original CSV, line 385

Original ledger status

FLATAWAY.RP.01

FLATAWAY.RP.01

THE FLAT-AWAY LEMMA AS A NAMED MINI-THEOREM (2026-06-18). States the one open link of v289 precisely and types its three proof routes (opened by the v290 red-team). LEMMA: given RawRPSeam with the mass gap, chirality and the four mu4 branch marks, the SMOOTH curvature density in the DtN sub-principal symbol VANISHES away from the branch divisor (the seam is flat away from the four marks). It is the bottleneck because v288 lifts the Z4 block-diagonality to L^2 GIVEN a mark-sourced (flat-away) sub-principal term, and v290 shows a smooth Z4 off-mark curvature passes the commutator yet shifts the spectrum -- so Flat-Away is exactly the gap and must be closed with spectral/energy/heat input. THREE ROUTES: [E] SPECTRAL-RIGIDITY -- scanning f=eps*cos(4 theta), the DtN-spectrum deviation from the flat integer ladder is 0 ONLY at eps=0 and grows with |eps|, so the forced KMS spectrum has the flat seam as its unique match (lever, conditional on pinning the spectrum); [E] HEAT-KERNEL -- the heat trace Tr(e^{-t Lambda}) deviation is 0 ONLY at eps=0, so matching the flat/(E8)_1 heat data forces the smooth curvature to vanish; [C] RP-ENERGY -- RP+gap is a Dirichlet-energy minimisation in the Troyanov conformal class with prescribed cone angles, whose unique minimiser is the constant-curvature (flat-away) metric (Troyanov; cf. v284). VERDICT: three INDEPENDENT routes to ONE lemma; closing any one closes Route B (and with Route A's holomorphy half, SEAM.EQUIV.01). All three remain open handles, not proofs.

Recorded status: Contract [O] (lemma + verdict) + [E] (spectral/heat uniqueness) + [C] (Troyanov route)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: [O] the lemma + the verdict (three open handles); [E] the spectral-rigidity + heat-kernel uniqueness demonstrations (flat is the unique match in the smooth Z4 family); [C] the RP-energy/Troyanov route. A contract turning Flat-Away into a precise, attackable mini-theorem; does NOT prove it.

Dependencies: SEAM.ADVERSARY.01; MARKLOCAL.RAW.01; SEAM.EQUIV.B01; SEAM.EQUIV.01; QGEO.ROUTEI.01

Scripts: v291_flataway_contract.py

Location: tfpt_research_contracts

Original CSV, line 386

Open questions preserve their achieved subresults

Each research problem has its own scope. A resolved task does not close its whole physical parent. Historical tasks remain explicitly historical in the source record.

Future quotient and positive GNS reconstruction

What is determined by complete future behavior, and what additional positive word-kernel source is needed to reconstruct a cyclic operator realization?

  • Resolved in scope: Future quotient from complete rRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Conditional GNS reconstruction from supplied KRead result
  • open: Select complete K from the original source
Historical: common source, state and event selection

Outside the active mathematical research program since the user's23Oct2026 decision. Historical question: Do the original principles derive a common physical source together with its state, dynamical events, and physically observed fields?

Seam connection and family action

Does the joint discrete theorem determine a concrete connection and a family coupling compatible with the determinant seam action?

  • Resolved in scope: Separate classes from actual transportRead result
  • open: Derive the common connection from the original source
Physical time and complete transfer

Do the original reflection/projector structures determine the full physical time generator and required field transfer?

  • Resolved in scope: Reuse the sign-projector counterexampleRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Reuse conditional full-transfer reconstructionRead result
  • open: Identify the physical complete TFPT transfer
  • Resolved in scope: Reuse complete collar reconstructionRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Classify homogeneous GKLS embedding of the shared register familyRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Decide every homogeneous GKSL logarithm of the fixed M4 channelRead result
Flavor ratio and absolute amplitude scale

Which flavor quantity is fixed on the derived discrete stratum, and which requires the continuous holonomy anchor?

  • Resolved in scope: Reuse the derived flavor ratioRead result
  • open: Determine the absolute holonomy amplitude
Alpha: derived terms, unique root and physical EM identification

Where do the factors and closed alpha equation come from, which provenance steps are proved, and which precise physical EM identification remains open?

  • Resolved in scope: Separate root calculation from source selectionRead result
  • open: Derive the actual EM functional variation and Thomson identification
  • Resolved in scope: Establish the unique global positive rootRead result
Geometric flow and gravity normalization

Do common matter-only observations derive geometric horizon flow and the area response from the original gravity source?

  • Resolved in scope: Record scope of fixed original functionalRead result
  • open: Derive geometric modular response and area coefficient
Clocks and complete neutral source response

Which complete quadratic response can the actual clock images reconstruct?

  • Resolved in scope: Reconstruct all neutral quadratic matrix directionsRead result
  • open: Derive physically admissible probe access
Clock action on charge, time and quarter transition

How does the actual Gaussian J act on the complete marked source?

  • Resolved in scope: Construct original J lift with complete time/charge actionRead result
  • open: Derive physical meaning of the frame orbit
Which responses distinguish charged time action?

Which data separate sources with identical complete neutral vacuum response?

  • Resolved in scope: Determine twist blindness completelyRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Reconstruct twist from charged responsesRead result
  • open: Derive actual charged source probes
Which seam action distinguishes native opposite charges?

Can existing native charge fields produce the quarter-twist time response of the seam?

  • Resolved in scope: Check native fields and response discriminatorRead result
  • open: Derive actual marked seam/state action
Constructive seam search: operators, state and source compatibility

What does the complete phase search decide, and which additional state information prevents a false source solution?

  • Resolved in scope: Finite search closed, actual winding and parity equivalenceRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Positive finite-word state extensionRead result
  • Resolved in scope: E8 current group conditionally determines the P signRead result
  • Resolved in scope: The same shift functional hides distinct ground statesRead result
  • Resolved in scope: No phase hit realizes the unchanged sourceRead result
Which partner actually belongs to the original seam?

Which charge, state type and time action belong to the root partner and original sheet pairing?

  • Resolved in scope: Concrete pair operator; source neutrality is not hypercharge neutralityRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Fixed quarter time splits the color/weak multipletRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Explicit conjugation for the existing sheet pairingRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Actual partner map between quarter domainsRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Bilinear sheet pairing is not Hermitian kernel selectionRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Actual quarter conjugation transports the supplied markingRead result
  • Resolved in scope: No time-stabilizing orthogonal repair of the fixed markingRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Spinor16 is a state sector, not a 16-real one-particle fieldRead result
Automated construction of operator maps and sources

Which tools generate operator maps, learn counterexamples, and can search for the full positive source?

  • Resolved in scope: Calibrate new search without supplying the target mapRead result
  • open: Synthesize a joint field, marking and transfer dictionary
  • open: Search for the positive common source kernel itself
  • Resolved in scope: Automatically construct, certify and distinguish finite kernelsRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Repair search conditions against source types and collar controlsRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Reconstruct multi-field sewing of the canonically identified boundary sourceRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Retain absolute reference amplitude in searchRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Integrate supplied free source including boundary response and scalarRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Convert the full finite CAR kernel into a link functionalRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Close original recursive word reconstruction with memoryRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Retain whole original caller through scale and readoutRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute actual shared Higgs source with full matter words and local RPRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Reduce whole constant original Higgs spectral fiberRead result
  • open: Resolve original geometric Higgs residue sign and field map
  • Resolved in scope: Evaluate local original Higgs heat identification and whole finite consumerRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute whole variable bound Higgs reference and original scale mapRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute whole inner Higgs scale/source and normal kernel transportRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute given whole superconnection and normal spectral readerRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Determine own-admissibility and whole total-chiral spectral readersRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Derive whole scale-energy map,normal profile and relative flowRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute original Green energy producer and mixed scale readoutRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Match current action argument and common Higgs/gravity weightsRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute whole original curvature consumers and Higgs radial sourceRead resultRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute original whole four-ghost source and geometric type testRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute original moving normal kernel derivative and whole source responseRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Decide fixed original O1 source and normal operator placementRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Compare whole Higgs mixture and covariance reader on invariant four-field witnessRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Test exact bounded cutoff on whole ordinary Higgs volumeRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Test whole original circle joint mode and IR Higgs normalizationRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Test original O1 mode covariance against whole Higgs-law classRead result
  • open: Reconstruct original localization from the whole process
  • Resolved in scope: Test bare native-code word compression against actual localityRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Decide original geometric local-time class and execute actual interval readerRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute actual regional two-face partner and supported charged wordRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute original color marginal, modular field law and complete class readerRead resultRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Reconstruct common Higgs law from whole original quarter source towerRead resultRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute original record action on Doily and ordered whole source responseRead resultRead resultRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Locally implement original record process and test unchanged exterior sourceRead resultRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute original elliptic insertion,whole source and causal responseRead resultRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Evaluate actual joint Higgs and color group sourceRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute whole original graph color reader with typed original center selectorRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute original color fixed source and first inherited grading testRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute actual original color-spinor CAR four-word and complete spin-sector sewingRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Decide actual color admissibility of density operations and coordinate regionsRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute actual whole seam-operation class and two-face responseRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute entire original C6 word expansion with source amplitudeRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute original collective Higgs force source and entire mean dualRead resultRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute original all-mode force with actual time and whole sourceRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute original local space/time force source and causal liftRead resultRead result
Origin reverse selection, field dictionary and original P1 kernel

What does reverse selection of P1/P2 give for concrete local fields and multi-field responses, and which identification with the original P1 kernel has actually been proved?

Observable reality: minimal conditions and counterworlds

Which operational conditions are independently required, which inequivalent models satisfy them, and which observable distinctions remain for selection?

Formal carrier core: unbounded Pascal uniqueness and finite glue

Which carrier and glue statements are already present in the papers and Lean sources, and which physical selection does not follow?

  • Resolved in scope: Classify the unbounded Pascal proofRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Classify the formal finite glue scopeRead result
Active mathematical program: marked seam monodromies and lattice lifts

Which marked seam/lattice transport geometries, lift classes and local-coefficient invariants arise from existing clock/reflection/quartic data? First complete case: sign lifts of fourJ representation on CP1 minusμ4.

  • Resolved in scope: Define marked seam category and factor formulaRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Completely classify quarter-clock four-puncture liftsRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Determine central class and all subgroup restrictionsRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Determine full G0 cocycle and classRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Determine native4/5/6local cohomologyRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Classify unrestricted G31 reflection monodromiesRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Determine lift class beyond G0Read result
  • open: Classify additional reflection/clock equivariance and mapping-class quotients
  • Resolved in scope: Equivariant lifting and divisibility by eightRead result
  • Resolved in scope: All62clock obstructions and central transport variantsRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Actual group comparison and central pushout exclusionRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Complete invariants and explicit collisionsRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Compare E6 and E7 slices with the actual quarter clockRead resultRead resultRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Classify original character-valued G31monodromy liftsRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Determine E7-pair action on all original lattice fieldsRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Completely connect E6/E7 cuts to the original compilerRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Compare common covers and actual clock carriersRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Prove shared representation consequence for48,4/3 and5/4Read result
  • Resolved in scope: Completely decide joint compiler-field-cover constructionRead resultRead resultRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Reconstruct canonical local compiler field source from C4Read resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Eliminate redundant sector and multiplicity assumptionsRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Classify native equivariant markingsRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Classify pure quarter clock mapping class quotientRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Determine complete cut algebra and lossless tetrahedron transformRead resultRead resultRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Completely compare scalar glue and actual native compiler classRead resultRead resultRead resultRead result
Common clock sectors, quartic geometry and operational reconstruction

Which previously separate data of the original TFPT core follow from a common clock and representation geometry, and which complete finite measurement classification follows without asserting physical source selection?

Automatic response search with original-source decision

Which additional joint response actually follows from original source equations, and which entire finite process family remains undecided without it?