Skip to main content
Back to the knowledge atlas

Original claim records.

The original technical record remains available here. For explanations, reviewed conclusions and the history of research questions, start with the knowledge atlas.

Research snapshot 2026-11-02 · 783 active ledger claims · 710 scientific findings · 707 registered scripts. These are different inventories, not counts of independent physical confirmations.

What does this inventory cover?

Every one of the 783 active ledger IDs is included. All 788 ledger rows, including superseded rows, remain in the download. The reviewed research corpus contains 711 findings; 1 administrative record is excluded from public scientific content, with the omission recorded in the coverage file.

The scientific findings include 519 established scoped results, 63 conditional results and 128 scoped exclusions. These labels describe the recorded finding. They do not upgrade its parent physical goal or overwrite the original ledger.

Sources were matched to their recorded hashes and line ranges at this snapshot. Bounded text excerpts make sources available even when a source is not in the earlier public release. Any omitted administrative lines are explicitly marked. This is source coverage, not a new execution of Python, Lean or Wolfram proofs.

Atlas revision 2c1b559b738e5740ecfad8e6 · snapshot SHA256 68c2fe33ce86d45a99a8c21b1e731e40749d0accb3ae69be53d198cd7ebcb48e

1493 matching records · page 8 of 75

Original ledger status

FLAV.PENCIL.02

FLAV.PENCIL.02

Operator-pencil geometry of (K,Q,R,L) - the anchor plane as a small area in operator space (validated review block; all in admissible classes). STRONG: [2] ANCHOR SINGULARITY THEOREM det B(K+xQ)=9x^2+21x+10=(N_fam x+|Z2|)(N_fam x+g_car)=(3x+2)(3x+5), oriented anchor area degenerates at x=-|Z2|/N_fam=-2/3 (Koide target/gap base (2/3)^6) and x=-g_car/N_fam=-5/3 (D5/A3 glue asymmetry) => 2/3 is the FIRST SINGULAR POINT of the mass<->transport anchor plane, not just a recurring fraction [I/L]; [4] buildup chain (3,7,6,4) partial sums (3,10,16,20)=(N_fam,A_Lambda,dim S+,det L), scalaron 7=A_Lambda-N_fam [I]; [6] type checker det B_Q=9=N_fam^2, det B_K=10=A_Lambda, det B_R=16=dim S+, det B_L=40=|R(D5)| [I/L]. AUDIT (exact values [I], reading decorative [P]): [3] differential spectrum D,D',D'' at -1,0,1,2 = (2,4,20,68),(1,6,29,70),(-4,14,32,50) (29=top E8 exp, 32=2^gcar, 50=A4xA4 block); [5] F4xG2 shadow det B_{R+Q}=52=dim F4, chi_[K,Q]=t^3+5t+14 (14=dim G2), |Pl_R(K)|_1=26, 248=52+14+26*7 = real E8->F4xG2 branching (52,1)+(1,14)+(26,7) - an operator shadow, not a Lie-theoretic embedding proof

Recorded status: Identity/Lattice [I]/[L] + audit [P]

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: Identity/Lattice [I]/[L] (anchor singularity, type checker) + [P] (atlas/F4xG2 shadow audit)

Dependencies: FLAV.PENCIL.01; FLAV.KQ.01; v37; v52; v74

Scripts: v80_operator_pencil_geometry.py

Location: tfpt_2

Original CSV, line 147

Original ledger status

FLAV.PENCIL.03

FLAV.PENCIL.03

The mass-transport pencil P(x)=K+xQ as a projective line with two anchor-block singularities, and the DOUBLE COVER branched over them (validated review block; all in admissible classes). CENTRAL [I/L]: det B(K+xQ)=(3x+2)(3x+5) is quadratic => y^2=det B(K+xQ) is a 2:1 cover ramified exactly over its zeros, so the Koide/gap point x=-|Z2|/N_fam=-2/3 and the carrier point x=-g_car/N_fam=-5/3 are THE TWO BRANCH POINTS of one double cover; deck involution y->-y of degree 2=|Z2|=the sheet (line-bundle reflection of the Spin(10)->SO(10) half-spinor cover the carrier lives on). Branch locus = -(spine ends 2,5)/N_fam; discriminant = 81 = N_fam^4 (perfect square => rational/split, sqrt=9=N_fam^2=det B_Q); separation = 1 = one transport period (deck-translation x->x+1 maps carrier->Koide). So 2/3 is not a recurring quotient but ONE ramification point of the mass<->transport double cover; sharper open question: why does the leptonic source-to-pole transfer renormalise onto a branch point and which sheet (y->+-) does parity select. DEEPER: the branch divisor symmetric functions ARE the core atoms - sum of branch points = -scalaron/N_fam = -7/3, product = A_Lambda/N_fam^2 = 10/9, integer labels {|Z2|,g_car}={2,5} have sum=7=scalaron, product=10=A_Lambda, diff=3=N_fam, so the scalaron is the TRACE of the branch divisor and all earlier scalaron readouts collapse to this one geometric origin; the fiber y^2=det B is A_Lambda at K and 4A_Lambda at L (transport K->L multiplies the fiber by |Z2|), and the Z2 sheet endpoint x=-1 lies between the branch points where y^2=-|Z2|<0 (the sheet lives on the imaginary cut joining Koide and carrier); the clean cover is a property of the anchor 2-plane <1,a> (the full-3-space cubic det(K+xQ) has disc -1132 with an irrational real root), so the anchor projection regularises the geometry (anchor-first). CLEARING MATRICES [I/L]: Koide C_{2/3}=3K-2Q reproduces D5+A3 glue (tr=15=dim A3, sum=45=dim D5, det=60=D_start), rank-one (forced) anchor block B(C23)=(g_car,7)^T(N_fam^2,11)=(5,7)^T(9,11), sum=240=|R(E8)|; carrier C_{5/3}=3K-5Q charge-neutral (sum=0), chi=(lam+|Z2|)(lam^2+lam+|R+A3|)=(lam+2)(lam^2+lam+6). Scalaron 7 = mixed anchor discriminant/N_fam = (det B_L - det B_K - det B_Q)/N_fam = (40-10-9)/3 (B_L=B_K+B_Q linearity; 7 is an interference area, not a leftover) [I]. c_u/c_d=55/117 diagnostic readout at sheet endpoint K-Q (Plucker v37 canonical) [I]

Recorded status: Identity/Lattice [I]/[L] + audit [P]

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: Identity/Lattice [I]/[L] (double cover / branch locus, clearing matrices, mixed-disc scalaron) + [P] (per-entry atlas reading of clearing matrices)

Dependencies: FLAV.PENCIL.01; FLAV.PENCIL.02; v37; v52; v74; v80

Scripts: v81_singular_pencil_matrices.py

Location: tfpt_2

Original CSV, line 148

Original ledger status

FR.KOIDE.04

FR.KOIDE.04

Koide RG attractor is FORCED, not postulated [I] + ONE [P] identification (sharpens FR.KOIDE.01/02/03 via the v81 double cover): a branch-divisor-preserving Moebius map of the pencil line that fixes BOTH branch points q=2 (Koide) and q=5 (carrier) is, in the cross-ratio coordinate rho=(q-2)/(5-q), EXACTLY rho->mu*rho, hence UNIQUE once mu is fixed [I]. The multiplier is NOT a new input: mu=(2/3)^6 is the subleading eigenvalue lambda2 of the THEORY'S OWN unique gapped boundary transfer operator (v54/v56, spectrum {1,(2/3)^6,(1/3)^6}, gap 6 log(3/2)>0), and the Koide branch x=-2/3=-|Z2|/N_fam IS its cusp weight 2/3={0,1,|Z2|}/N_fam; carrier q=5 -> Koide q=2 under the deck period q->q-N_fam (shared cusp class 2/3). With mu=(2/3)^6 the unique map is the integer Moebius map F(q)=2(569q-3325)/(665q-3517), F(2)=2, F(5)=5, F'(2)=(2/3)^6<1 (Koide is the ATTRACTOR), F'(5)=(3/2)^6>1 (carrier the REPELLER), so q_n->2 i.e. x->-2/3 at the SAME rate that governs SM flavor and horizon recovery. NET: the three 'structural postulates' for a Koide derivation collapse to ONE physical identification - source->pole transfer = branch-preserving relaxation of the established transfer operator; rate, uniqueness and direction then follow. NOT a closure: the single identification stays [P]

Recorded status: Physical (conjecture sharpened) + Identity [I]

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: Identity [I] (map uniqueness + multiplier = the established transfer gap) + Physical [P] (the one source->pole identification; no closure)

Dependencies: FR.KOIDE.01; FR.KOIDE.03; FLAV.PENCIL.03; v54; v56; v81

Scripts: v82_koide_attractor_splitting.py

Location: tfpt_4

Original CSV, line 149

Original ledger status

FLAV.PENCIL.04

FLAV.PENCIL.04

Anchor-placement splitting trichotomy - the clean rational double cover is NON-GENERIC (anchor-first hardening) [I] + [P] (sector id). The splitting-type exponents (2,1,1) (= the anchor (1,1,2); v32 splitting O(-2)+O(-1)^2) placed across the three family slots give three DIFFERENT covers: (1,1,2) heavy-in-fam3 (lepton) det B(K+xQ)=(3x+2)(3x+5) disc=81=N_fam^4 -> SPLIT (individually rational branch labels {2,5}); (2,1,1) heavy-in-fam1 det B=(x+2)(9x+11) disc=49=scalaron^2 -> SPLIT; (1,2,1) heavy-in-fam2 det B=5x^2+10x+3 disc=40=|R(D5)|=det B(L) -> NON-SPLIT (Galois-conjugate IRRATIONAL branch points -1 +/- sqrt(10)/5, centered EXACTLY on the sheet x=-1 (q=3), separation 2 sqrt(A_Lambda)). The three discriminants are themselves compiler atoms (N_fam^4, scalaron^2, |R(D5)|). Negative control (cf. v81): the R-pencil disc=153 is not a square either => Koide & carrier as SEPARATE RATIONAL singularities is a special feature of the canonical anchor placement, not generic. Restates the basis-invariant core T=3 B(Q)^-1 B(K)=[[5,11/3],[0,2]] (Spec{2,5}, tr=7=scalaron, det=10=A_Lambda). The physical fermion-sector identification of the placements is NOT claimed and stays [P]

Recorded status: Identity [I] + Physical [P] (sector id)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: Identity [I] (discriminant trichotomy, non-genericity, negative control) + [P] (physical sector identification of the placements)

Dependencies: FLAV.PENCIL.02; FLAV.PENCIL.03; v32; v80; v81

Scripts: v82_koide_attractor_splitting.py

Location: tfpt_2

Original CSV, line 150

Original ledger status

REDTEAM.A.01

REDTEAM.A.01

Red Team / Stress Test Target A - adversarial attack on the (E8)_1 boundary-net identification (GATE.METRIC.03). CONFIRMS the conservative wording: central charge is NECESSARY not sufficient - (D8)_1=SO(16)_1 also has c=120/15=8 but is non-holomorphic (4 primaries 1,v,s,c), and the c=8 Narain family is positive-dimensional; (E8)_1 is the UNIQUE holomorphic c=8 net (even unimodular rank-8 lattice = E8), so HOLOMORPHY (mu-index 1) is the load-bearing extra assumption. The conformal embedding c_coset=c(E8)-c(D5)-c(A3)=8-5-3=0 is compatibility, NOT the physical subnet identification; Delta_eff>0 SUPPORTS tightness (clustering) but does not prove it; the constructive seam-Calderon->(E8)_1 map and bulk-reconstruction uniqueness are missing. VERDICT: keep 'reduced to a rigorous boundary-net identification problem', do NOT write 'metric sector closed'

Recorded status: Red-team [P] (reduced, not closed)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: Red-team verdict: reduced, not closed [P]

Dependencies: GATE.METRIC.03; v77; v76; v61

Scripts: redteam/rt_A_e8net.py

Location: tfpt_5_redteam

Original CSV, line 151

Original ledger status

REDTEAM.B.01

REDTEAM.B.01

Red Team Target B - attack on the UPSTREAM physical premise of Theorem A (the Lean arithmetic 2^g=g^2+g+2 <=> g=5 is NOT attacked; it is verified [F]). Finding: the carrier rank is selected by the Pascal RULE, not the arithmetic. Perturbing the constant 2^g=g^2+g+c gives {5} only at c=2; the truncation degree K in 2^(g-1)=sum_{k<=K} C(g,k) sets g=2K+1 (K=0->1, 1->3, 2->5, 3->7), so choosing K=2 is the physical input. Over-determined (D5 half-spinor dim S+=2^(g-1)=16 <=> g=5; family closure N_fam=(2^(g-1)-1)/g, g+N_fam=8 also pick 5) but each is itself a postulate. VERDICT: the arithmetic core stands [F]; the Pascal SELECTION must be typed [A]/[P], not [I]

Recorded status: Red-team [F]+[A] (survives, narrowed)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: Red-team verdict: survives; Pascal selection now typed [A]/[P]

Dependencies: FORM.CAR.01; CAR.UNIQ.01; v2; v14

Scripts: redteam/rt_B_pascal.py

Location: tfpt_5_redteam

Original CSV, line 152

Original ledger status

REDTEAM.C.01

REDTEAM.C.01

Red Team Target C - dimensional firewall on k=c3/2. The reduced coefficient k_red=c3/2=1/(16pi) is dimensionless; the only legal chain is k_phys=k_red/G, S=4pi k_phys A_phys=A_phys/(4G). The forbidden form k_phys=c3/2 is dimensionally false (legal only at G=1 / Planck units). Firewall scan of v67/v68/v73: 28 'c3/2' mentions, ZERO naked dimensionful identities, each file establishes the reduced/seam-unit/G=1 context; the firewall's teeth are verified against a synthetic violation. VERDICT: safe as worded (reduced coefficient); the absolute 1/G (UV-sensitive, Sakharov/Connes) stays the one dimensionful anchor

Recorded status: Red-team [I]+[A] (survives)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: Red-team verdict: survives as worded (reduced coefficient)

Dependencies: SEAM.AREACOEFF.01; SEAM.AREACOEFF.02; v67; v68; v73

Scripts: redteam/rt_C_kc3.py

Location: tfpt_5_redteam

Original CSV, line 153

Original ledger status

REDTEAM.D.01

REDTEAM.D.01

Red Team Target D - stress test of the U_point->v_geo bijection (FLAV.UPOINT.01). For positive reals (ratios,product) <=> (individuals) is a bijection and the TFPT sectors satisfy it (positive rational c, odd size 3=N_fam). Counterexamples off-assumption: even sector size leaves a SIGN ambiguity ({2,3} vs {-2,-3} share ratio 3/2 and product 6); complex amplitudes leave an n-th-root BRANCH ambiguity ({1,1,1},{w,w,w},{w^2,w^2,w^2}, w=e^{2pi i/3}, share all ratios and product 1); a zero amplitude is degenerate. GENUINE RESIDUAL: the bijection fixes amplitude MAGNITUDES only - CP phases delta_CKM/PMNS are complex and are NOT folded into v_geo. VERDICT: holds for TFPT once four hypotheses (real, positive, fixed branch, no zeros / odd sector size) are made EXPLICIT (they are silent in v75). NARROWED (2026-07-29, T177/v561): the magnitude data carry EXACTLY ZERO phase on the TFPT sectors -- arg(prod c) = 0 exactly for both the lepton and the up-quark triple, so the CP residual is not hidden in the product -- and the branch-group blindness is the statement that the branch ORDER divides N_fam = 3 (a mu4 branch already shifts the product phase by -pi/2). The residual is a FIBER datum (the hexagonal CM unit), not a magnitude datum -- a narrowing of the residual, no upgrade.

Recorded status: Red-team [I]+[A] (survives, narrowed)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: Red-team verdict: survives; four hypotheses now explicit; CP-phase residual, narrowed to a FIBER datum: arg(prod c)=0 exactly on both sectors, branch blindness = order divides N_fam=3 (T177/v561)

Dependencies: FLAV.UPOINT.01; v75; v20; v24

Scripts: redteam/rt_D_upoint.py, v561_cp_channel_identities.py

Location: tfpt_5_redteam

Original CSV, line 154

Original ledger status

REDTEAM.E.01

REDTEAM.E.01

Red Team Target E - single-scale audit of v_geo (ANCHOR.VGEO.01). The closed compiler + protected IR readouts all reduce to (pure number) x v_geo: M_scal=c3^(7/2) Mbar, f_a=(c3/|mu4|)^(7/2) Mbar, masses=(pi/sqrt2) c_f phi0^k v_geo, and 1/G shares the same anchor (v68/v75). The audit SURFACES non-pure-reduction candidates: the seam cutoff Lambda (only an identification seam=Planck collapses it to v_geo), the electroweak matching scale, the reheating temperature, and the leptogenesis scale - all frontier [P]/[A] inputs that must NOT be silently absorbed into v_geo. VERDICT: v_geo is the unique dimensional floor of the CERTIFIED tiers (true by dimensional analysis); full single-scale-ness is conditional on the flagged identifications staying honestly typed

Recorded status: Red-team [I]+[A] (survives, narrowed)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: Red-team verdict: floor of certified tiers; frontier scales must stay typed

Dependencies: ANCHOR.VGEO.01; FLAV.UPOINT.01; v78; v68; v60

Scripts: redteam/rt_E_vgeo.py

Location: tfpt_5_redteam

Original CSV, line 155

Original ledger status

GATE.METRIC.04

GATE.METRIC.04

Red-team Target A residual 1 CLOSED [L] (holomorphy is necessary AND sufficient to pin (E8)_1): at level 1 the number of primaries = det(Cartan) = |fundamental group|, giving A3=4, D5=4, D8=4, E8=1. So holomorphy (single vacuum sector = mu-index 1 = det 1) excludes the SAME-c rival (D8)_1=SO(16)_1 (c=120/15=8 but 4 primaries 1,v,s,c) - equal central charge is necessary not sufficient - AND is sufficient: a holomorphic c=8 chiral CFT is the lattice theory of an even unimodular rank-8 lattice, of which there is exactly ONE, E8, by the Minkowski-Siegel mass formula (mass=1/|W(E8)|=1/696729600=1/(2^14*3^5*5^2*7), and |Aut(E8)|=|W(E8)| saturates it; E8 Gram even, det 1). The (D5)_1x(A3)_1 conformal embedding c=5+3=8=c(E8) is compatibility (16 primaries vs 1), NOT the subnet identification. CONSEQUENCE: with this, the constructive map need only show the seam-Calderon boundary net is holomorphic & c=8 (then E8 is automatic), so Target A drops from 3 residuals to 2: (i) boundary-net holomorphy+c=8 (Delta_eff>0 supports, not proves), (ii) bulk-reconstruction uniqueness - both still [P]/[A]

Recorded status: Lattice [L] (residual 1 closed) + [P]/[A] (residuals 2-3 open)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: Lattice [L]: holomorphy => (E8)_1 unique (residual 1 closed); residuals 2 (constructive map) + 3 (bulk uniqueness) remain [P]/[A]

Dependencies: REDTEAM.A.01; GATE.METRIC.03; v77; v66; v1

Scripts: v83_e8net_holomorphic_uniqueness.py

Location: tfpt_5_redteam

Original CSV, line 156

Original ledger status

CAR.PASCAL.01

CAR.PASCAL.01

Red-team Target B residual REDUCED [I]/[L]: the carrier 'K=2 Pascal truncation' flagged by the red team as a free postulate is NOT free. K=(g-1)/2 is the Pascal-row MIDPOINT: sum_{k<=(g-1)/2} C(g,k) = 2^(g-1) for every odd g (verified g=3,5,7,9), i.e. the half-spinor split of the 2^g Dirac spinor. Equivalently the carrier is the even Clifford half-spinor Lambda^even(C^g_car): C(5,0)+C(5,2)+C(5,4)=1+10+5=16=2^(g_car-1)=dim S+. So Target-B's residual is not 'why K=2' but the single standard input 'carrier = half-spinor of Spin(2 g_car)', already used in the D5+A3 glue (v1/v15); the Lean arithmetic 2^g=g^2+g+2<=>g=5 stays [F]

Recorded status: Identity/Lattice [I]/[L] (B residual reduced to the half-spinor input)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: Identity/Lattice [I]/[L]: K=(g-1)/2 is the half-spinor midpoint, not a free truncation; B residual reduced to the standard half-spinor carrier

Dependencies: REDTEAM.B.01; FORM.CAR.01; CAR.UNIQ.01; v2; v44

Scripts: v83_e8net_holomorphic_uniqueness.py

Location: tfpt_5_redteam;tfpt_1

Original CSV, line 157

Original ledger status

REG.FREEZE.01

REG.FREEZE.01

Blind-prediction registry FROZEN 2026-06-09, machine-enforced (review point: pre-registration before JUNO/CMB-S4/LiteBIRD/DESI). predictions_frozen.json freezes every dimensionless prediction of record at 25 significant digits; v84 re-derives each decimal from the two axioms {c3,g_car} on every run, so formula and frozen value are locked together (changing either alone FAILS the suite; the file is covered by manifest.sha256). Registry layers: core [N] (alpha^-1, lambda_C, s23/s13 CKM, sin^2 th13, lepton + quark mass ratios), conditional [N]/[P] with the hypothesis NAMED (th12 seed via seam-misalignment, beta_rad, Omega_b, delta_CKM leading, M_scal/Mbar, rho_Lambda/Mbar^4 branch), assigned (delta_CP^nu=240deg, th23=0.5), conditional BANDS for r and n_s at the declared external N_star in [50,60]. THETA12 FREEZE ENFORCED: exactly ONE prediction of record = seed 1/3-phi0/2 = 0.306747357245; the seam (0.306808) and nonlinear (0.307020) values are typed as derived variants of the SAME texture and may NOT appear as predictions (look-elsewhere ambiguity machine-excluded)

Recorded status: Numerical [N] (registry lock) + typing discipline

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: Numerical [N] (registry lock)

Dependencies: EM.FP.01; FLAV.TH12.01; PRED.LAYER.01; freeze_file.csv

Scripts: v84_frozen_registry.py

Location: verification;tfpt_2;introduction

Original CSV, line 158

Original ledger status

FLAV.PENCIL.05

FLAV.PENCIL.05

MASTER-COVER THEOREM (answers next.txt P3; resolves P6 negatively; types P4) [I]/[L]: the anchor-block determinant is GL(2)-COVARIANT on the pencil plane span{K,Q} - det B((aK+bQ)+x(cK+dQ)) = (gamma x+alpha)^2 * p_KQ(moebius_G(x)) exactly (symbolic identity), with disc = 81*det(G)^2 = N_fam^4 x square. CONSEQUENCE: there is exactly ONE anchor-block double cover up to Moebius reparametrisation of the line, the master cover y^2=(3x+2)(3x+5) of v81; the whole disc-81 family observed in next.txt P3 (branch {-8/3,-5/3} for L+xQ, {-5/8,-2/5} for K+xL, {-3/2,-3/5} for Q+xK) is its GL(2) orbit, and the conspicuous rung -8/3 = -rank(E8)/N_fam is the carrier branch point shifted by ONE transport period (rank E8 = g_car+N_fam: -(g_car+N_fam)/N_fam = -g_car/N_fam - 1), i.e. no new structure. NEGATIVE CONTROLS (anchor-first hardened): leaving the anchor plane in the R-direction gives non-square discriminants 153 (R+xQ) and 201 (K+xR) - non-split, no rational cover. P6 HONEST NEGATIVE: the natural 4-sheet candidate det B(K+xQ)*det B(L+xQ) factors through the forced square (3x+5)^2, so mu4=Z4 does NOT act as a genuine 4:1 cover of the pencil line; the transport tower generates a LADDER of double covers (rung n: branch {-2/3-n,-5/3-n}) with second level w^2=(3x+2)(3x+8) (disc 324=18^2) connecting Koide to rank E8 at branch separation 2=|Z2|. P4 TYPED: the branch-divisor trace -7/3=-scalaron/N_fam fixes only the SCALE exponent (M_scal=c3^{7/2}Mbar); n_s=1-2/N_star and r=12/N_star^2 are functions of the external N_star alone, so the cover cannot promote the tilt from [P]. Physical readings (Koide branch <-> physical Koide, sheet <-> half-spinor) stay [P] as in v81/v82

Recorded status: Identity/Lattice [I]/[L] (GL(2) covariance + family classification) + [P] physical readings

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: Identity/Lattice [I]/[L]: one master cover; family = GL(2) orbit; mu4 not a 4:1 cover; tilt stays [P]

Dependencies: FLAV.PENCIL.04; v80; v81; v82

Scripts: v85_master_cover.py

Location: verification;next.txt

Original CSV, line 159

Original ledger status

COSMO.NSTAR.01

COSMO.NSTAR.01

N_star band -> POINT [P] (the announced 'future derivation from a reheating model' executed; demotion of N_star as a compiler output STANDS): the only compiler input is M_scal=c3^{7/2}Mbar=3.0600e13 GeV [I] (v28/v36/v80); everything downstream is imported standard physics - scalaron width Gamma=N_eff M^3/(48pi Mbar^2) with N_eff=4 (SM Higgs doublet; Starobinsky/Vilenkin/Gorbunov-Panin), reheating at H=Gamma => T_reh=(30 rho/(pi^2 g*))^{1/4}=9.55e9 GeV (g*=106.75), pivot matching with w=0 scalaron oscillations + entropy conservation on the EXACT Starobinsky potential V=(3/4)M^2 Mbar^2(1-e^{-sqrt(2/3)phi})^2. RESULT: N_star(k=0.05/Mpc)=51.44 => n_s=1-2/N_star=0.9611, r=12/N_star^2=0.00454. CROSS-CHECK: k=0.002/Mpc gives N_star=54.7 = the known R^2-reheating literature value (~54). ROBUSTNESS: channel ambiguity N_eff=1..100 moves N_star by <0.8 e-folds (log sensitivity); instantaneous-reheating upper bound N_star<=55.7. FREEZE DISCIPLINE: 51.4 lies inside the frozen registry band [50,60]; predictions_frozen.json NOT modified (v84 lock intact). HONEST TENSIONS RECORDED: (1) n_s=0.9611 is +0.90 sigma below Planck 2018 (0.9649+-0.0042) and increases the DESI-combined tension; (2) A_s COHERENCE is sharper: with M_scal fixed A_s=N^2 c3^7/(24pi^2) is also predicted, A_s(51.44)=1.764e-9 = -11.4 sigma vs Planck 2.105(30)e-9; the A_s-preferred N_star=56.20 exceeds even the instantaneous-reheating bound 55.61 by 0.59 e-folds (instantaneous gives 2.06e-9 = -1.5 sigma, compatible) => within standard physics the measured A_s REQUIRES near-instantaneous reheating and the slow Higgs-channel point is A_s-disfavoured. The [P] point is CONDITIONAL on the decay channel; the frozen band [50,60] remains the prediction surface of record. Kill criteria: robust n_s>=0.967 falsifies the reheating chain (not the [I]/[L] core); A_s already arbitrates between fast and slow reheating

Recorded status: Physical [P] (conditional on M_Star=M_scal + standard reheating)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: Physical [P]: N_star=51.4 point inside the frozen band; demotion as compiler output stands

Dependencies: GRAV.SCAL.01 (M_scal); PRED.LAYER.01; REG.FREEZE.01

Scripts: v86_nstar_reheating.py

Location: origin_theory;tfpt_2;introduction

Original CSV, line 160

Original ledger status

GATE.METRIC.05

GATE.METRIC.05

Red-team Target A residual (ii) CONDITIONALLY CLOSED [L] -> Target A = ONE residual: bulk-reconstruction uniqueness is NOT independent of residual (i). By the AQFT classification of full 2D CFTs over a chiral net (Longo-Rehren 1995; Kawahigashi-Longo-Mueger 2001; Bischoff-Kawahigashi-Longo-Rehren arXiv:1405.7863) the possible bulks = haploid commutative Q-systems = physical modular invariants of Rep(A); for a HOLOMORPHIC net Rep(A)=Vect so the bulk pairing is UNIQUE. MACHINE-CHECKED CONTRAST: the same-c rival SO(16)_1 (discriminant category Z2xZ2 of D8, q=(0,1/2,1,1), mu-index=4, S/T built explicitly, S^2=I, (ST)^3=I) admits exactly SIX modular invariants (Z>=0 integer, Z_00=1, [Z,S]=[Z,T]=0, entries<=2): diagonal, s<->c swap, BOTH E8-extension invariants |chi_0+chi_{s,c}|^2 (= the lattice glue E8=D8 u (D8+s): h_s=1 bosonic/condensable, index 2, det=4/4=1 even unimodular, cf v1/v83) and two twisted pairings => without holomorphy the c=8 bulk is MULTIPLY ambiguous; with one primary trivially Z=(1) unique. CONSEQUENCE: the whole of Target A reduces to the SINGLE theorem 'seam-Calderon boundary net is holomorphic with c=8' - then (E8)_1 (v83/GATE.METRIC.04) AND the unique bulk (this row) follow; the hypothesis stays [P]/[A]. Honest scope: nothing here proves the seam net IS holomorphic

Recorded status: Lattice [L] (classification + machine contrast) + [P]/[A] (the one remaining hypothesis)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: Lattice [L]: bulk uniqueness rides on holomorphy; Target A = ONE residual

Dependencies: GATE.METRIC.04; REDTEAM.A.01; v83; v77

Scripts: v87_bulk_uniqueness_reduction.py

Location: tfpt_5_redteam

Original CSV, line 161

Original ledger status

FLAV.CP.01

FLAV.CP.01

Red-team Target D follow-up: CP-phase residual QUANTIFIED [N] (not closed; freeze respected): frozen leading reading delta_CKM=pi/3+3 lam^2=1.198232 rad=68.654 deg (registry DELTA_CKM_RAD untouched) gives J=3.327e-5 [I]. Clean phase probe gamma_PDG=65.7+-3.0 deg: pull +0.98 sigma => leading reading SURVIVES. AUDIT (recorded, explicitly NOT promoted): the data central value sits 0.07 deg from the ALTERNATIVE coefficient reading pi/3+2 lam^2 (|Z2| instead of N_fam) - the residual is -1.02 lam^2; textbook look-elsewhere trap, the registry keeps coefficient N_fam=3 (REG.FREEZE.01/v84 forbid silent switching). DECISION THRESHOLD: the two readings differ by lam^2=2.884 deg => 3-sigma distinguishable once sigma_gamma<=0.96 deg (LHCb upgrade / Belle II). Kill both ways: |gamma-68.65deg|>3sigma at sigma_gamma<1deg kills the N_fam coefficient; gamma->68.65 retires the |Z2| shadow. CAVEAT: J-inversion residual -3.15 lam^2 is magnitude-contaminated (TFPT source-scale s23=0.0434 vs PDG M_Z 0.0408; J pull +1.76 sigma recorded); gamma is the clean probe. Target-D typing unchanged: phases remain outside v_geo [P]

Recorded status: Numerical [N] (audit + thresholds) + [P] (phase mechanism open)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: Numerical [N]: leading reading survives at +0.98 sigma; residual = -1.02 lam^2 recorded; decision at sigma_gamma<1 deg

Dependencies: REDTEAM.D.01; REG.FREEZE.01; FLAV.CKM.01

Scripts: v88_cp_phase_audit.py

Location: tfpt_5_redteam;tfpt_2

Original CSV, line 162

Original ledger status

GATE.METRIC.06

GATE.METRIC.06

CARRIER INDEX LEMMA [L] - the Gate-A theorem gets an equivalent index-theoretic form (sharper as a target): by Kawahigashi-Longo-Mueger (mu_A=[B:A]^2 mu_B; lattice nets mu=|discriminant|=det Cartan) the carrier inclusion has Jones index [(E8)_1:(D5)_1x(A3)_1]=sqrt(16/1)=4=|mu_4|=|Z2|^2 - the glue-group order IS the inclusion index. The extension is the mu_4 simple-current extension at level 1: adjoint branching 248=(45,1)+(1,15)+(16,4b)+(16b,4)+(10,6)=45+15+64+64+60; the three non-vacuum glue sectors are CURRENTS (h=1 exactly: 1/2+1/2, 5/8+3/8, 5/8+3/8); 1+3=4 sectors = the same Z4 glue as the lattice construction (v1). mu-additivity: an index-4 simple-current extension of the carrier has mu=16/16=1, so HOLOMORPHY FOLLOWS from the index statement - it need not be assumed. CONSEQUENCE: (H) 'seam-Calderon net holomorphic with c=8' <=> (H') 'seam net contains the carrier net with Jones index 4 as its mu_4 simple-current extension'. Why sharper: both ends of (H') are constructed objects (v77), finite index is controllable by Longo index theory, and the gap Delta_eff>0 (v76) supports finiteness. Negative control: mu(SO(16)_1)=4!=1 (v83/v87). Honest scope: the seam-side index computation is NOT done here; the boundary-net identification stays [P]/[A]

Recorded status: Lattice [L] (index arithmetic + reframing) + [P]/[A] (seam-side identification)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: Lattice [L]: Gate A <=> index-4 mu_4 simple-current extension of the carrier net

Dependencies: GATE.METRIC.05; GATE.METRIC.04; E8.GLU.01; v77

Scripts: v89_carrier_index_lemma.py

Location: tfpt_5_redteam;tfpt_research_contracts

Original CSV, line 163

Original ledger status

SEAM.AREACOEFF.03

SEAM.AREACOEFF.03

Seam-Horizon programme: the Fursaev-Solodukhin factor 4pi is now DERIVED, not imported [I] (removes the literature import of v67): (1) smoothed-cone Gauss-Bonnet - regularising the 2D cone (opening alpha) by a tangent spherical cap (tangency alpha=cos theta0) gives Int K dA = 2pi(1-cos theta0) = 2pi(1-alpha) EXACTLY, independent of the smoothing radius (topological; GB closure Int k_g=2pi alpha, chi(disk)=1; limits: hemisphere->cylinder alpha=0, flat->plane alpha=1); (2) codim-2 lift: Int sqrt(g)R -> 2*2pi(1-alpha)A = 4pi(1-alpha)A; (3) replica definition S=-d_alpha[logZ(alpha)-alpha logZ(1)]|_1 with logZ=k_red Int sqrt(g)R gives S=4pi k_red A with the smooth part dropping out - the FS relation machine-derived; (4) k_red=c3/2 (v73/SEAM.KHALF.01) => S=2pi c3 A, and S=A/4 forces c3=1/(8pi) UNIQUELY (sympy-solved). RESIDUAL ISOLATED [A]: the single remaining step is 'replica variation of the seam determinant (gapped Calderon kernel) produces the EH form k_red Int sqrt(g) R with cutoff-independent k_red' = the Seam-Horizon Theorem proper (SEAM.THEOREM.01); steps 1-4 contain no Bekenstein-Hawking import

Recorded status: Identity [I] (chain derived) + [A] (the one isolated residual)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: Identity [I]: S=4pi k A derived; S=A/4 <=> c3=1/(8pi); residual = seam determinant => EH form

Dependencies: SEAM.AREACOEFF.01; SEAM.AREACOEFF.02; SEAM.KHALF.01; SEAM.THEOREM.01

Scripts: v90_conical_defect_chain.py

Location: origin_theory;tfpt_horizon_readouts

Original CSV, line 164

Original ledger status

ARCH.SPINE.01

ARCH.SPINE.01

SPINE TETRAHEDRON - the compiler microkernel as ONE finite object (review proposal 2026-06-10, validated and typed): the spine T={2,3,4,5}={|Z2|,N_fam,|mu4|,g_car} equals {e3(a),p0(a),e1(a),e2(a)} for the anchor a=(1,1,2), so the tetrahedron is the anchor plus its zeroth moment, not a second structure [I]. Edge products {6,8,10,12,15,20} = {|R+(A3)|/C6, rank E8=h(D5)=det R, A_Lambda=|E(K5)|, |R(A3)|=dim SM gauge, dim A3, det L} [I]; face products {24,30,40,60} = {|W(A3)|, h(E8), |R(D5)|=SumL, cascade start=dim(10,6) block (v89)} [I]; volume 120=|R+(E8)|=5!=sum E8 exponents=Tr_S+ X^2 [I]. Graph reading: |R(E8)|=240=|mu4|*|E(K4)|*|E(K5)| with |E(K4)|=p2(a)=6, |E(K5)|=p3(a)=10, plus negative control: breaks at K6 (|E(K6)|=15 != p4(a)=18) - specific not generic [I]. DISCIPLINE: the dual cuts (node x opposite face, edge x opposite edge, all =120) are TAUTOLOGIES of complementary partitions - typed as presentation raster, never as evidence; the grammar is a SUB-grammar (7, 16, 41, 48, 240, 248 are NOT subset products: the tetrahedron complements the admissibility filter, it does not replace it). chi_T=t^4-14t^3+71t^2-154t+120 (coefficients = node/edge/face sums + volume; 14=dim G2; spine symmetric about 7/2: chi(0)=chi(7)=120, chi(1)=chi(6)=24; scalaron 7=2+5=3+4 = complementary-pair sum = the same 7 as the branch-divisor trace v80/v81) typed AUDIT, not load-bearing

Recorded status: Identity [I] (closures + negative control) + Audit (chi_T fingerprint; dual cuts = presentation)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: Identity [I]: spine tetrahedron closures; dual cuts tautological; sub-grammar honestly typed

Dependencies: ANCHOR.GEN.01; FLAV.PENCIL.05; GATE.METRIC.06 (60=dim(10,6))

Scripts: v91_spine_tetrahedron.py

Location: tfpt_1;tfpt_3

Original CSV, line 165

Original ledger status

GATE.METRIC.07

GATE.METRIC.07

GLUE UNIQUENESS [I]/[L] - the carrier extension tower completely classified (Gate A loses its last structural freedom): extensions of the carrier net/lattice correspond to isotropic subgroups of the discriminant form (Z4xZ4, q=(5x^2+3y^2)/8; q reproduces the level-1 sector weights of v87/v89). Exhaustive enumeration of all 15 subgroups: isotropic = {1, Z2, Z4, Z4}. (a) Exactly TWO Lagrangian glues <(1,1)> and <(1,3)>, each det=16/16=1 even unimodular rank 8 => E8 (unique, Minkowski-Siegel v83); they are swapped by EITHER single spinor conjugation (D5 or A3) and fixed by the simultaneous one => the mu_4 glue is unique UP TO THE SHEET Z2 - the two chiralities, matching exactly the two E8-extension modular invariants |chi_0+chi_{s,c}|^2 of v87. (b) The UNIQUE halfway extension {(0,0),(2,2)} has H_perp/H=Z2xZ2 with induced q={0,0,0,1/2} = the D8 discriminant form => SO(16)_1 is the ONLY intermediate of the tower (and is excluded by holomorphy, mu=4!=1). TOWER: carrier (mu=16) -> SO(16)_1 (mu=4) -> (E8)_1 (mu=1, sheet pair) - nothing else exists. CONSEQUENCE: with v89 (index 4 <=> holomorphy) and this row, Gate A is the BARE index statement 'the seam-Calderon inclusion has Jones index 4'; which extension it then is carries NO freedom. Seam-side identification stays [P]/[A]

Recorded status: Identity/Lattice [I]/[L] (exhaustive classification) + [P]/[A] (seam side)

Dependencies, status detail and source

Canonical status: Identity/Lattice [I]/[L]: extension tower = carrier -> SO(16)_1 -> E8 (sheet pair); no freedom left in WHICH extension

Dependencies: GATE.METRIC.06; GATE.METRIC.05; E8.GLU.01; v83; v87

Scripts: v92_glue_uniqueness.py

Location: tfpt_5_redteam;tfpt_1

Original CSV, line 166

Open questions preserve their achieved subresults

Each research problem has its own scope. A resolved task does not close its whole physical parent. Historical tasks remain explicitly historical in the source record.

Future quotient and positive GNS reconstruction

What is determined by complete future behavior, and what additional positive word-kernel source is needed to reconstruct a cyclic operator realization?

  • Resolved in scope: Future quotient from complete rRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Conditional GNS reconstruction from supplied KRead result
  • open: Select complete K from the original source
Historical: common source, state and event selection

Outside the active mathematical research program since the user's23Oct2026 decision. Historical question: Do the original principles derive a common physical source together with its state, dynamical events, and physically observed fields?

Seam connection and family action

Does the joint discrete theorem determine a concrete connection and a family coupling compatible with the determinant seam action?

  • Resolved in scope: Separate classes from actual transportRead result
  • open: Derive the common connection from the original source
Physical time and complete transfer

Do the original reflection/projector structures determine the full physical time generator and required field transfer?

  • Resolved in scope: Reuse the sign-projector counterexampleRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Reuse conditional full-transfer reconstructionRead result
  • open: Identify the physical complete TFPT transfer
  • Resolved in scope: Reuse complete collar reconstructionRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Classify homogeneous GKLS embedding of the shared register familyRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Decide every homogeneous GKSL logarithm of the fixed M4 channelRead result
Flavor ratio and absolute amplitude scale

Which flavor quantity is fixed on the derived discrete stratum, and which requires the continuous holonomy anchor?

  • Resolved in scope: Reuse the derived flavor ratioRead result
  • open: Determine the absolute holonomy amplitude
Alpha: derived terms, unique root and physical EM identification

Where do the factors and closed alpha equation come from, which provenance steps are proved, and which precise physical EM identification remains open?

  • Resolved in scope: Separate root calculation from source selectionRead result
  • open: Derive the actual EM functional variation and Thomson identification
  • Resolved in scope: Establish the unique global positive rootRead result
Geometric flow and gravity normalization

Do common matter-only observations derive geometric horizon flow and the area response from the original gravity source?

  • Resolved in scope: Record scope of fixed original functionalRead result
  • open: Derive geometric modular response and area coefficient
Clocks and complete neutral source response

Which complete quadratic response can the actual clock images reconstruct?

  • Resolved in scope: Reconstruct all neutral quadratic matrix directionsRead result
  • open: Derive physically admissible probe access
Clock action on charge, time and quarter transition

How does the actual Gaussian J act on the complete marked source?

  • Resolved in scope: Construct original J lift with complete time/charge actionRead result
  • open: Derive physical meaning of the frame orbit
Which responses distinguish charged time action?

Which data separate sources with identical complete neutral vacuum response?

  • Resolved in scope: Determine twist blindness completelyRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Reconstruct twist from charged responsesRead result
  • open: Derive actual charged source probes
Which seam action distinguishes native opposite charges?

Can existing native charge fields produce the quarter-twist time response of the seam?

  • Resolved in scope: Check native fields and response discriminatorRead result
  • open: Derive actual marked seam/state action
Constructive seam search: operators, state and source compatibility

What does the complete phase search decide, and which additional state information prevents a false source solution?

  • Resolved in scope: Finite search closed, actual winding and parity equivalenceRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Positive finite-word state extensionRead result
  • Resolved in scope: E8 current group conditionally determines the P signRead result
  • Resolved in scope: The same shift functional hides distinct ground statesRead result
  • Resolved in scope: No phase hit realizes the unchanged sourceRead result
Which partner actually belongs to the original seam?

Which charge, state type and time action belong to the root partner and original sheet pairing?

  • Resolved in scope: Concrete pair operator; source neutrality is not hypercharge neutralityRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Fixed quarter time splits the color/weak multipletRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Explicit conjugation for the existing sheet pairingRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Actual partner map between quarter domainsRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Bilinear sheet pairing is not Hermitian kernel selectionRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Actual quarter conjugation transports the supplied markingRead result
  • Resolved in scope: No time-stabilizing orthogonal repair of the fixed markingRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Spinor16 is a state sector, not a 16-real one-particle fieldRead result
Automated construction of operator maps and sources

Which tools generate operator maps, learn counterexamples, and can search for the full positive source?

  • Resolved in scope: Calibrate new search without supplying the target mapRead result
  • open: Synthesize a joint field, marking and transfer dictionary
  • open: Search for the positive common source kernel itself
  • Resolved in scope: Automatically construct, certify and distinguish finite kernelsRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Repair search conditions against source types and collar controlsRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Reconstruct multi-field sewing of the canonically identified boundary sourceRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Retain absolute reference amplitude in searchRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Integrate supplied free source including boundary response and scalarRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Convert the full finite CAR kernel into a link functionalRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Close original recursive word reconstruction with memoryRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Retain whole original caller through scale and readoutRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute actual shared Higgs source with full matter words and local RPRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Reduce whole constant original Higgs spectral fiberRead result
  • open: Resolve original geometric Higgs residue sign and field map
  • Resolved in scope: Evaluate local original Higgs heat identification and whole finite consumerRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute whole variable bound Higgs reference and original scale mapRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute whole inner Higgs scale/source and normal kernel transportRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute given whole superconnection and normal spectral readerRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Determine own-admissibility and whole total-chiral spectral readersRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Derive whole scale-energy map,normal profile and relative flowRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute original Green energy producer and mixed scale readoutRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Match current action argument and common Higgs/gravity weightsRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute whole original curvature consumers and Higgs radial sourceRead resultRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute original whole four-ghost source and geometric type testRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute original moving normal kernel derivative and whole source responseRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Decide fixed original O1 source and normal operator placementRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Compare whole Higgs mixture and covariance reader on invariant four-field witnessRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Test exact bounded cutoff on whole ordinary Higgs volumeRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Test whole original circle joint mode and IR Higgs normalizationRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Test original O1 mode covariance against whole Higgs-law classRead result
  • open: Reconstruct original localization from the whole process
  • Resolved in scope: Test bare native-code word compression against actual localityRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Decide original geometric local-time class and execute actual interval readerRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute actual regional two-face partner and supported charged wordRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute original color marginal, modular field law and complete class readerRead resultRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Reconstruct common Higgs law from whole original quarter source towerRead resultRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute original record action on Doily and ordered whole source responseRead resultRead resultRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Locally implement original record process and test unchanged exterior sourceRead resultRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute original elliptic insertion,whole source and causal responseRead resultRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Evaluate actual joint Higgs and color group sourceRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute whole original graph color reader with typed original center selectorRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute original color fixed source and first inherited grading testRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute actual original color-spinor CAR four-word and complete spin-sector sewingRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Decide actual color admissibility of density operations and coordinate regionsRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute actual whole seam-operation class and two-face responseRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute entire original C6 word expansion with source amplitudeRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute original collective Higgs force source and entire mean dualRead resultRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute original all-mode force with actual time and whole sourceRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Execute original local space/time force source and causal liftRead resultRead result
Origin reverse selection, field dictionary and original P1 kernel

What does reverse selection of P1/P2 give for concrete local fields and multi-field responses, and which identification with the original P1 kernel has actually been proved?

Observable reality: minimal conditions and counterworlds

Which operational conditions are independently required, which inequivalent models satisfy them, and which observable distinctions remain for selection?

Formal carrier core: unbounded Pascal uniqueness and finite glue

Which carrier and glue statements are already present in the papers and Lean sources, and which physical selection does not follow?

  • Resolved in scope: Classify the unbounded Pascal proofRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Classify the formal finite glue scopeRead result
Active mathematical program: marked seam monodromies and lattice lifts

Which marked seam/lattice transport geometries, lift classes and local-coefficient invariants arise from existing clock/reflection/quartic data? First complete case: sign lifts of fourJ representation on CP1 minusμ4.

  • Resolved in scope: Define marked seam category and factor formulaRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Completely classify quarter-clock four-puncture liftsRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Determine central class and all subgroup restrictionsRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Determine full G0 cocycle and classRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Determine native4/5/6local cohomologyRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Classify unrestricted G31 reflection monodromiesRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Determine lift class beyond G0Read result
  • open: Classify additional reflection/clock equivariance and mapping-class quotients
  • Resolved in scope: Equivariant lifting and divisibility by eightRead result
  • Resolved in scope: All62clock obstructions and central transport variantsRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Actual group comparison and central pushout exclusionRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Complete invariants and explicit collisionsRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Compare E6 and E7 slices with the actual quarter clockRead resultRead resultRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Classify original character-valued G31monodromy liftsRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Determine E7-pair action on all original lattice fieldsRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Completely connect E6/E7 cuts to the original compilerRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Compare common covers and actual clock carriersRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Prove shared representation consequence for48,4/3 and5/4Read result
  • Resolved in scope: Completely decide joint compiler-field-cover constructionRead resultRead resultRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Reconstruct canonical local compiler field source from C4Read resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Eliminate redundant sector and multiplicity assumptionsRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Classify native equivariant markingsRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Classify pure quarter clock mapping class quotientRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Determine complete cut algebra and lossless tetrahedron transformRead resultRead resultRead resultRead result
  • Resolved in scope: Completely compare scalar glue and actual native compiler classRead resultRead resultRead resultRead result
Common clock sectors, quartic geometry and operational reconstruction

Which previously separate data of the original TFPT core follow from a common clock and representation geometry, and which complete finite measurement classification follows without asserting physical source selection?

Automatic response search with original-source decision

Which additional joint response actually follows from original source equations, and which entire finite process family remains undecided without it?